2006 Annual CAPS Accomplishment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2006 Annual CAPS Accomplishment Report 2006 Annual Accomplishment Report of the Illinois Cooperative Agriculture Pest Survey (CAPS) Program This annual report outlines exotic pest detection activities conducted according to guidelines issued by the Eastern Region Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006. The document format will basically follow the outline provided in Appendix H - Annual Report Form. The approved Illinois Calendar Year 2006 CAPS Work Plan consisted of a core program that outlined specific state activities including target pest surveys and maintenance of the CAPS network. Part II of the 2006 program focused on exotic woodborer/bark beetle surveys at high-risk sites in Illinois as part of the National Exotic Woodboring/Bark Beetle Survey. Results of these funded surveys and other survey activities not requiring support are included in this report. Illinois Natural History Survey (Illinois Department of Natural Resources) and Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Illinois Department of Agriculture (IDA) United State Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) Prepared by Kelly A. Cook Illinois Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey (CAPS) State Survey Coordinator Illinois Natural History Survey Table of Contents CORE FUNDING ACTIVITIES ...............................................................................................3 Overview of Results and Accomplishments......................................................3 State CAPS Committee......................................................................................4 CAPS Meetings..................................................................................................5 CAPS Training/Outreach...................................................................................5 Diagnostics.........................................................................................................6 NAPIS DATABASE SUBMISSIONS ......................................................................................7 CORE WORK PLAN SURVEYS ...........................................................................................10 Emerald Ash Borer Survey..............................................................................10 Soybean Rust Survey.......................................................................................13 Soybean Pod Borer Survey..............................................................................15 Leek Moth Survey............................................................................................15 Sudden Oak Death Survey...............................................................................15 Exotic Snail Surveys........................................................................................15 PART II WORK PLAN SURVEYS ........................................................................................16 National Exotic Wood Borer/Bark Beetle Survey...........................................16 SURVEYS NOT REQUIRING ADDITIONAL FUNDING ..................................................18 Soybean Aphid Survey....................................................................................18 Gypsy Moth Survey.........................................................................................19 Asian Gypsy Moth Survey...............................................................................21 Pine Shoot Beetle Survey.................................................................................23 Asian Longhorned Beetle Survey....................................................................23 Karnal Bunt Survey..........................................................................................24 Kudzu Survey...................................................................................................24 Japanese Beetle Survey....................................................................................24 Giant Hogweed Survey....................................................................................25 APPENDIX ..........................................................................................................................26 A. Exotic Pests of Concern in Illinois.............................................................26 B. Instructions for Submitting Giant Hogweed Specimen..............................28 UI Plant Clinic Giant Hogweed Form.......................................................29 2 I. Core Level Funding Activities State Survey Coordinator Name: Kelly A. Cook Agency: Illinois Natural History Survey Address: 1816 S. Oak St, I-Bldg 221 Champaign, IL 61820 Phone: (217) 333-1005 FAX: (217) 265-5110 Email: [email protected] Overview of Results or Benefits Expected and Actual Accomplishments The Cooperator seeks to conduct a cooperative agricultural pest survey program that is expected to result in: 1. Designation of a new State Survey Coordinator (SSC) and restructuring of the State CAPS Committee. • SSC Cook was hired in April 2006. She assumed the role of chairing the State CAPS committee. For the time being, the committee will remain as is; addition of new members will be as needed. 2. A network of state, county, federal, and public entities to evaluate risks, conduct surveys, and manage cooperative pest programs • The Illinois State Pest Risk Analysis Committee (SPARC) is composed of United States Department of Agriculture/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA/APHIS), Department of Homeland Security/Customs and Border Protection (DHS/CBP, and State cooperators and stakeholders who identify and review biological threats, compliance/noncompliance data and emerging pest risk patterns in Illinois field operations. The committee advises USDA/APHIS and IDA of situations that have implications for policy data so APHIS, in collaboration with IDA, can identify hot zones and use data for early pest detection efforts. It also provides data analysis and options to DHS/CBP to support risk management, planning, resource allocation, and decision making pertaining to biological agent entry into Illinois. 3. Surveys for selected harmful or economically significant non-native plant pests and weeds, including exotic pests, pests of export significance, and/or pests not known to occur in the U.S. • Surveys were conducted by the Illinois CAPS program, IDA, USDA/APHIS/PPQ, and other cooperators. Results of all surveys are reported beginning on page 10. 4. Presence/absence data at county level resolution for target pests and others approved for NAPIS entry. • NAPIS data from all surveying parties was collected and sent to SSC Cook who then summarized and entered data into NAPIS. The NAPIS summary report is on page 7. 3 5. NAPIS data entry and management • NAPIS data entry for Illinois is managed by SSC Cook. 6. Attendance by designated state representatives at state, regional, and national CAPS committees. • Attended the Eastern Region CAPS meeting (page 5) 7. Public outreach, education, and communication • A summary of outreach, education, and communication activities can be found beginning on page 5. State CAPS Committee Narrative The Committee is composed of individuals from USDA/APHIS/PPQ, Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois (including plant pathology and the UI Plant Clinic), and the Illinois Department of Agriculture. Some significant changes occurred during 2006; namely, the hiring of current Illinois state CAPS coordinator (SSC) Cook in April 2006. She replaces previous SSC Helm who retired on June 30, 2005. SSC Helm had been acting in interim roles to ensure continuity of the Illinois program while a search for a new SSC was completed. The State Survey Committee is currently structured as follows: State Survey Committee Members Name Organization Discipline Kelly Cook, SSC INHS-DBEE Entomology Leellen Solter INHS-DBEE Entomology Stephen Knight, SPHD USDA-APHIS-PPQ Federal Regulatory Jeffrey Coath, PSS USDA-APHIS-PPQ Federal Regulatory Warren Goetsch IDA State Regulatory Scott Frank IDA State Regulatory Mark Cinnamon, SPRO IDA State Regulatory Nancy Pataky U of I, Plant Clinic Plant Pathology Laura Ettema-Khan USDA-APHIS-PPQ Federal Regulatory Jeffrey Davidson USDA-APHIS-PPQ Federal Regulatory SSC – State Survey Coordinator INHS-DBEE – Illinois Natural History Survey, Division of Biodiversity and Ecological Entomology USDA-APHIS-PPQ – United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine SPHD – State Plant Health Director PSS – Pest Survey Specialist SPRO – State Plant Regulatory Official IDA – Illinois Department of Agriculture U of I – University of Illinois 4 State CAPS Committee Meeting CAPS Planning Committee Meeting, Champaign, IL, June 1, 2006. Committee members present: SSC Cook (chair), SPHD Knight, SPRO Cinnamon, PSS Coath, IDA representatives Goetsch and Frank, USDA-APHIS-PPQ representative Khan, Pataky (UI Plant Clinic), and Solter (INHS-DBEE). Agenda topics included: transition of new SSC in IL CAPS program, exotic pests of concern to Illinois, roles of new SSC and PSS in CAPS, and the 2007 IL CAPS work plan. Eastern Region CAPS Meeting Illinois SSC Cook, SPHD Knight and PSS Coath participated in the Eastern Region CAPS Meeting in Raleigh, NC, November 13-16, 2005. CAPS Networking, Training, and Related Activities 1. CAPS SSC Teleconference. 5/2/06. SSC’s of states within the central plant board met to discuss CAPS survey-related issues.
Recommended publications
  • Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition
    Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition AKA exotic, alien, non-native, introduced, non-indigenous, or foreign sp. National Invasive Species Council definition: (1) “a non-native (alien) to the ecosystem” (2) “a species likely to cause economic or harm to human health or environment” Not all invasive species are foreign origin (Spartina, bullfrog) Not all foreign species are invasive (Most US ag species are not native) Definition increasingly includes exotic diseases (West Nile virus, anthrax etc.) Can include genetically modified/ engineered and transgenic organisms Executive Order 13112 (1999) Directed Federal agencies to make IS a priority, and: “Identify any actions which could affect the status of invasive species; use their respective programs & authorities to prevent introductions; detect & respond rapidly to invasions; monitor populations restore native species & habitats in invaded ecosystems conduct research; and promote public education.” Not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that cause/promote IS intro/spread Political, Social, Habitat, Ecological, Environmental, Economic, Health, Trade & Commerce, & Climate Change Considerations Historical Perspective Native Americans – Early explorers – Plant explorers in Europe Pioneers moving across the US Food - Plants – Stored products – Crops – renegade seed Animals – Insects – ants, slugs Travelers – gardeners exchanging plants with friends Invasive Species… …can also be moved by • Household goods • Vehicles
    [Show full text]
  • Cellulosic Energy Cropping Systems Douglas L
    WILEY SERIES IN RENEWABLE RESOURCES Cellulosic Energy Cropping Systems Douglas L. Karlen Editor Cellulosic Energy Cropping Systems Wiley Series in Renewable Resources Series Editor Christian V. Stevens – Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Titles in the Series Wood Modification – Chemical, Thermal and Other Processes Callum A. S. Hill Renewables – Based Technology – Sustainability Assessment Jo Dewulf & Herman Van Langenhove Introduction to Chemicals from Biomass James H. Clark & Fabien E.I. Deswarte Biofuels Wim Soetaert & Erick Vandamme Handbook of Natural Colorants Thomas Bechtold & Rita Mussak Surfactants from Renewable Resources Mikael Kjellin & Ingegard¨ Johansson Industrial Application of Natural Fibres – Structure, Properties and Technical Applications Jorg¨ Mussig¨ Thermochemical Processing of Biomass – Conversion into Fuels, Chemicals and Power Robert C. Brown Biorefinery Co-Products: Phytochemicals, Primary Metabolites and Value-Added Biomass Processing Chantal Bergeron, Danielle Julie Carrier & Shri Ramaswamy Aqueous Pretreatment of Plant Biomass for Biological and Chemical Conversion to Fuels and Chemicals Charles E. Wyman Bio-Based Plastics: Materials and Applications Stephan Kabasci Introduction to Wood and Natural Fiber Composites Douglas Stokke, Qinglin Wu & Guangping Han Forthcoming Titles Cellulose Nanocrystals: Properties, Production and Applications Wadood Hamad Introduction to Chemicals from Biomass, 2nd edition James Clark & Fabien Deswarte Lignin and Lignans as Renewable Raw Materials:
    [Show full text]
  • International Poplar Commission
    INTERNATIONAL POPLAR COMMISSION 25th Session Berlin, Germany, 13- 16 September 2016 Poplars and Other Fast-Growing Trees - Renewable Resources for Future Green Economies Synthesis of Country Progress Reports - Activities Related to Poplar and Willow Cultivation and Utilization- 2012 through 2016 September 2016 Forestry Policy and Resources Division Working Paper IPC/15 Forestry Department FAO, Rome, Italy Disclaimer Twenty-one member countries of the IPC, and Moldova, the Russian Federation and Serbia, three non-member countries, have provided national progress reports to the 25th Session of the International Poplar Commission. A synthesis has been made by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations that summarizes issues, highlights status and identifies trends affecting the cultivation, management and utilization of poplars and willows in temperate and boreal regions of the world. Comments and feedback are welcome. For further information, please contact: Mr. Walter Kollert Secretary International Poplar Commission Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 1 I-00153 Rome Italy E-mail: [email protected] For quotation: FAO, 2016. Poplars and Other Fast-Growing Trees - Renewable Resources for Future Green Economies. Synthesis of Country Progress Reports. 25th Session of the International Poplar Commission, Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany, 13-16 September 2016. Working Paper IPC/15. Forestry Policy and Resources Division, FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/forestry/ipc2016/en/.
    [Show full text]
  • Recerca I Territori V12 B (002)(1).Pdf
    Butterfly and moths in l’Empordà and their response to global change Recerca i territori Volume 12 NUMBER 12 / SEPTEMBER 2020 Edition Graphic design Càtedra d’Ecosistemes Litorals Mediterranis Mostra Comunicació Parc Natural del Montgrí, les Illes Medes i el Baix Ter Museu de la Mediterrània Printing Gràfiques Agustí Coordinadors of the volume Constantí Stefanescu, Tristan Lafranchis ISSN: 2013-5939 Dipòsit legal: GI 896-2020 “Recerca i Territori” Collection Coordinator Printed on recycled paper Cyclus print Xavier Quintana With the support of: Summary Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Xavier Quintana Butterflies of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ................................................................................................................. 11 Tristan Lafranchis Moths of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ............................................................................................................................31 Tristan Lafranchis The dispersion of Lepidoptera in the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ...........................................................51 Tristan Lafranchis Three decades of butterfly monitoring at El Cortalet ...................................................................................69 (Aiguamolls de l’Empordà Natural Park) Constantí Stefanescu Effects of abandonment and restoration in Mediterranean meadows .......................................87
    [Show full text]
  • Orta Anadolu Bölgesinde Kültür Bitkilerinde Zararlı Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) Faunası Üzerine Araştırmalar1
    BİTKİ KORUMA BÜLTENİ 2005, 45 (1-4):17-44 ISSN 0406-3597 Orta Anadolu Bölgesinde Kültür Bitkilerinde Zararlı Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) Faunası Üzerine Araştırmalar1 Mustafa ÖZDEMİR2 Yasemin ÖZDEMİR2 Selma SEVEN3 Vildan BOZKURT2 SUMMARY Investigations on Pest Tortricidae Fauna (Lepidoptera) on Cultural Plants in Central Anatolia Region The aim of the present study is to gather data on species, which are pests of or can become pests of culture plants of Central Anatolia when ecological conditions are suitable, and their distributions. Larvae and adult specimens of the family Tortricidae (Lepidoptera), which are collected from cultural lands and surroundings of Afyon, Amasya, Bolu, Burdur, Düzce, Isparta, Kırıkkale, Konya and Niğde provinces during 2000-2004, and previously collected 1005 specimens that had been collected from the same region and have been kept in the collection of Plant Protection Central Research Institute Plant Protection Museum are examined. Larvae specimens are collected from the culture plants that they feed on and adult specimens are collected with the use of either light traps or by Nets. According to the field observations and literature, the identified 34 species are considered to be pests or to become pests when ecological conditions are suitable. Archips rosanus (Linnaeus, 1758) is observed to be the most common species. Each species is presented with original references, synonyms, collection data of the specimens, food plants of the larvae, and distribution in Turkey and throughout the world. Key words: Turkey, Central Anatolia, Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, pest 1 Bu proje Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Tarımsal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü tarafından desteklenen ve 2005 yılında sonuşlanan B5–00/17–1–004 nolu projenin sonuç raporunun bir bölümüdür.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Global Barcode Library for Lymantria (Lepidoptera: Lymantriinae) Tussock Moths of Biosecurity Concern
    Towards a Global Barcode Library for Lymantria (Lepidoptera: Lymantriinae) Tussock Moths of Biosecurity Concern Jeremy R. deWaard1,2*, Andrew Mitchell3, Melody A. Keena4, David Gopurenko5, Laura M. Boykin6, Karen F. Armstrong6, Michael G. Pogue7, Joao Lima8, Robin Floyd8, Robert H. Hanner8, Leland M. Humble1,9 1 Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2 Entomology, Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 3 Entomology, Australian Museum, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 4 Northern Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture, Hamden, Connecticut, United States of America, 5 Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Industry & Investment NSW, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, 6 Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand, 7 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., United States of America, 8 Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 9 Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada Abstract Background: Detecting and controlling the movements of invasive species, such as insect pests, relies upon rapid and accurate species identification in order to initiate containment procedures by the appropriate authorities. Many species in the tussock moth genus Lymantria are significant forestry pests, including the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar L., and consequently have been a focus for the development of molecular
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding and Forest Biosecurity L.M
    DNA barcoding and forest biosecurity L.M. Humble, J.R. deWaard, R. Hanner and P.D.N. Hebert Introduction Biosurveillance (cont’d) The ability to distinguish non-indigenous Results species (NIS) from native species is critical to The identification engine in the Barcode of Life the success of any surveillance program. database (BOLD-ID) was used to obtain initial Unfortunately there are numerous problems identifications for the 925 specimens (Fig. 3). Figure 4. Argyresthia pruniella (left) and inherent with detection of NIS including: Dichelonia histrionana (right) • ~190 species clusters with a 3% sequence • large samples needed to detect NIS when divergence cut-off (Hebert et al. 2003) they are present at low levels Identification of • immature life stages often intercepted but • 124 clusters assigned to species, 61 to usually cannot be fully identified genus using BOLD-ID (all species immature life stages assignments were also confirmed • often inadequate knowledge of native fauna morphologically) Eggs, larvae or pupae are the most frequently We provide examples from forest bio- intercepted life stages of many quarantine • 66 remaining clusters were identified surveillance in Canada showing how these organisms. They usually cannot be fully morphologically (the only step in the problems can be circumvented by the identified to species’. identification process that required application of DNA barcoding (DNAB) for taxonomic specialists) • DNA barcodes are invariant during a species identification. species development; any life stage can be identified from its DNA sequence What is DNA barcoding? European poplar shoot borer, Gypsonoma aceriana, was first reported from North • DNAB uses the sequence variation in a America in 2001 short, standardized DNA fragment to identify organisms • barcoding of adults in museum collections confirmed its long-term presence in • DNA fragment used for animals is a 658 western Canada (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition
    The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition D.W. Emley 2014 Staffordshire Biological Recording Scheme Publication No. 22 1 The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition By D.W. Emley 2014 Staffordshire Biological Recording Scheme Publication No. 22 Published by Staffordshire Ecological Record, Wolseley Bridge, Stafford Copyright © D.W. Emley, 2014 ISBN (online version): 978-1-910434-00-0 Available from : http://www.staffs-ecology.org.uk Front cover : Beautiful Plume Amblyptilia acanthadactyla, Dave Emley Introduction to the up-dated and revised edition ............................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................... 2 MICROPTERIGIDAE ...................................................................................................................................... 3 ERIOCRANIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 3 NEPTICULIDAE .............................................................................................................................................. 4 OPOSTEGIDAE .............................................................................................................................................. 6 HELIOZELIDAE .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Forests, Wood Products and Wood Biotechnology of Iran and Germany - Part III
    In the year 2008 the research activities in the project “Deutsch-Arabisch/Iranischer Hochschuldialog” between the Research Institute for Forests and Rangelands, Teheran Ali Reza Kharazipour, Christian Schöpper, and the University of Göttingen were successfully continued. The project was financed Cora Müller and Markus Euring (Eds.) by the Department of Foreign Affairs in the context of the „Europäisch/Islamischen Kulturdialog“ (EIK) supervised by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). Now, like in the two years before, the present book gives again an overview of the Review of Forests, Wood Products common research themes in which the Iranian and German young scientists and and Wood Biotechnology of Iran and senior scientists of both countries works are summarised. The themes cover a wide variety in the research fields of forestry, mircobiology, forest zoology, wood science Germany - Part III and wood biotechnology. Kharazipour/Schöpper/Müller/Euring (Eds.) Review of Forests III Forests of Review (Eds.) Kharazipour/Schöpper/Müller/Euring ISBN 978-3-940344-72-4 Universitätsdrucke Göttingen Universitätsdrucke Göttingen Ali Reza Kharazipour, Christian Schöpper, Cora Müller, Markus Euring (Eds.) Review of Forests, Wood Products and Wood Biotechnology of Iran and Germany - Part III Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License erschienen in der Reihe der Universitätsdrucke im Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2009 Ali Reza Kharazipour, Christian Schöpper, Cora Müller and Markus Euring (Eds.) Review of Forests, Wood Products and Wood Biotechnology of Iran and Germany – Part III Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2009 Bibliographische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliographie; detaillierte bibliographische Daten sind im Internet über <http://dnb.ddb.de> abrufbar.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrant Tortricidae: Holarctic Versus Introduced Species in North America
    insects Article Immigrant Tortricidae: Holarctic versus Introduced Species in North America Todd M. Gilligan 1,*, John W. Brown 2 and Joaquín Baixeras 3 1 USDA-APHIS-PPQ-S&T, 2301 Research Boulevard, Suite 108, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA 2 Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA; [email protected] 3 Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, Carrer Catedràtic José Beltran, 2, 46980 Paterna, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 August 2020; Accepted: 29 August 2020; Published: 3 September 2020 Simple Summary: The family Tortricidae includes approximately 11,500 species of small moths, many of which are economically important pests worldwide. A large number of tortricid species have been inadvertently introduced into North America from Eurasia, and many have the potential to inflict considerable negative economic and ecological impacts. Because native species behave differently than introduced species, it is critical to distinguish between the two. Unfortunately, this can be a difficult task. In the past, many tortricids discovered in North America were assumed to be the same as their Eurasian counterparts, i.e., Holarctic. Using DNA sequence data, morphological characters, food plants, and historical records, we analyzed the origin of 151 species of Tortricidae present in North America. The results indicate that the number of Holarctic species has been overestimated by at least 20%. We also determined that the number of introduced tortricids in North America is unexpectedly high compared other families, with tortricids accounting for approximately 23–30% of the total number of moth and butterfly species introduced to North America.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Western Washington Pheromone-Trap Delimiting Survey
    2001 Entomology Project Report - WSDA PUB 061 (N/12/01) Laboratory Services Division, Pest Program Washington State Department of Agriculture December 27, 2001 2001 Western Washington Pheromone-trap Delimiting Survey and Field Observations for European Poplar Shoot Borer, Gypsonoma aceriana (Duponchel) (Lepidotpera: Tortricidae), an Old World Poplar Pest New to North America) Eric H. LaGasa1, Patrik Hertzog2, Dan Barshis2 , Kelley Turner2, and Hannah Smith2 Background Figure 1. 1998 – 1999 European Poplar Shoot Borer Collection Sites in Western Washington In 1998 and 1999, three male adults of European poplar shoot borer (EPSB), Gypsonoma aceriana (Duponchel), were collected, as non-target captures in various exotic pest surveys, in western Washington State. The first EPSB was found in the Seattle port area, in a mercury vapor light trap. Another specimen emerged inside a cage placed over leaf litter beneath hybrid poplars at the Washington State University Research Station near Puyallup, in Pierce Co. (T. Murray, collector). A third was found at a tree nursery near Roy, also in Pierce Co., in a trap baited with European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana [D. & S.], lure. (Figure 1.) EPSB is a notable pest of many poplar species, Populus spp. (Salacaceae), as well as hybrids in plantations and nurseries in Europe, where infestation of up to 93.7% of growing tips has been recently reported (Georgiev and Velcheva 1999). Young larvae mine leaves and older larvae bore into terminal shoots, often causing gall-like swellings (Bradley et al. 1979). Figure 2. Adult Gypsonoma aceriana (Duponchel) In exterior appearance, adults of G. aceriana (Kuznetsov 1987) (Figure 2.) are very similar to those of the North American cottonwood twig borer, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on a Tri-Trophic System
    Effects of habitat fragmentation on a tri-trophic system: Silene latifolia, Hadena bicruris and its parasitoids Elzinga, Jelmer Anne Effects of habitat fragmentation on a tri-trophic system: Silene latifolia, Hadena bicruris and its parasitoids / Elzinga J.A. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht, Faculteit Biologie, 2005 Thesis Utrecht University – with ref. – with a summary in Dutch Printed by Ponsen & Looijen BV, Wageningen ISBN 90-393-3904-X © 2005 J.A. Elzinga Front cover: female flowers of Silene latifolia with egg of Hadena bicruris, caterpillar of H. bicruris, and the parasitoids (from above): Microplitis tristis, Eurylabus tristis, Bracon variator and Ophion pteridis. Effects of habitat fragmentation on a tri-trophic system: Silene latifolia, Hadena bicruris and its parasitoids De effecten van habitatfragmentatie op een tritrofisch systeem: Silene latifolia, Hadena bicruris en haar parasitoïden (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, Prof. Dr. W.H. Gispen, ingevolge het besluit van het College voor Promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 24 januari 2005 des middags te 4.15 uur door Jelmer Anne Elzinga geboren op 17 juni 1976 te Leeuwarden Promotor: Prof. Dr. Jos M.M. van Damme Faculteit Biologie, Universiteit Utrecht Nederlands Instituut voor Ecologie (NIOO-KNAW) Cenrum voor Terrestrische Ecologie, Heteren Co-promotores: Dr. Arjen Biere Dr. Jeffrey A. Harvey Nederlands Instituut voor Ecologie (NIOO-KNAW) Centrum voor Terrestrische Ecologie, Heteren The research presented in this thesis was conducted at the Department of Plant Population Biology at the Centre for Terrestrial Ecology from the Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW) in Heteren, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]