DOCSLIB.ORG

Sedgeford Historical and Archaeological Research Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sedgeford Historical and Archaeological Research Project Sedgeford Historical and Archaeological Research Project Eaton Barn Field NHER 11263 – Non Invasive Techniques Survey Andy Black, Megan Dennis, Peter Eyre, James Grogan, John Hensby, Gabe Moshenska, Clive Sheppard and Heather Smith. Introduction Between the 7th and 12th of August 2005 a non invasive techniques survey of the southern part of Eaton Barn Field to the east of the barn (TF 696 363, NHER 11263) was carried out by the above authors. It was self financed by the Sedgeford Historical and Archaeological Research Project (SHARP) and was carried out by the kind permission of Ken Hill Estate. The survey was carried out as a small research project and as training during the SHARP Non Invasive Techniques (NITS) course. Topography and Geology The focus of the study was a small part of Eaton Barn Field. Figure 1 – Study Area in Eaton Barn Field This field is a gentle north facing slope on the south side of the Heacham Valley. It is under pasture but the north part of the field, closer to the river is waterlogged sedge and carr woodland. The underlying geology is chalk. 1 Historical and Archaeological Background Previous research in the area was mostly carried out by the Smithdon Hundred Research Group led by local historian Janet Hammond. This research had concentrated on three main techniques – the use of early maps and field books, a molehill survey in adjoining land and observations and personal records collected over a long period of time. Early maps and field books dating the 16th century show that Eaton had a significantly different pattern of land ownership to Sedgeford from an early period. The area lies close to the parish boundary and some documentary sources record it as being within Heacham parish (notably the Lewes Priory Chartulary collated in the 15th century). The molehill survey which recovered and plotted artefacts found in molehills carried out on adjoining land found pottery which is evidence for activity from the Iron Age to the post medieval period. The personal knowledge and observations gained from Janet Hammond were invaluable for knowledge of Eaton in more recent times. Documentary Evidence A visit was made to the Norfolk Records Office in Norwich. It was an opportunity to make searches on the office records and find anything that could throw light on the Eaton area. Amongst the documents that were examined were the following - A tithe map and apportionment from 1840 for Sedgeford. An enclosure map from 1797, a 1630 Estate Map, priory records (considerable amounts of land were held by Lewes or Norwich priories), poll books. Searches at the records office produced a considerable number of documents of various kinds for example land conveyances and wills, however it was never possible to know just how useful a document might be until it arrived from the archive. When the documents were examined most were found to be indecipherable. The writing was often too elaborate to follow or else the language could not be translated. Maps were perhaps the most easy to use of all documents. Maps are obviously graphic and so the problems associated with reading archaic writing is avoided. Several books in the archive library proved a useful resource. There were books on families from the local area e.g. the Rolfes and the Le Stranges. Away from our work at the records office, we drew on information from the Smithdon Hundred Local History Forum (a group of local historians). Janet Hammond another local historian would bring more information to the groups attention later in the week, when she made a visit and talked about her work and personal knowledge of the area. Shovel Test Pits Our group decided to do shovel test pits because the field had not been ploughed and so the grass was very long and hid the ground and the soil had not been disturbed greatly and so any archaeology would still be below the soil on the surface. We felt that shovel test pits was a suitable alternative to fieldwalking, because although it was intrusive, we still dug down to a depth, which was above the depth of soil that would have been ploughed. 2 We created a grid 70 metres by 40 metres using the corner of the barn as a fixed point of reference. We placed the sticks every ten metres. We placed three sticks in line with the corner of the barn going northwards down the slope of the field, with the first stick being placed just in front of the corner of the barn. We then placed 18 more sticks going east across the field with six sticks in line with each of the first three sticks going north. Later on, we placed 7 more sticks going east, south of the first row of sticks. When we had set up our grid, we then dug a pit that was 1 cubic foot at each of the sticks we had placed in the ground. First, we removed the turf above the pit so that we could place it back over the pit when we finished. When we removed the soil from the pit, we placed it into a sieve that was above a bucket. We broke up the soil so that in went through the sieve and so we were only left with the bigger objects that could not go through the sieve. We then checked these objects, took out any artefacts and ecofacts, and placed them into bags. Finally, we passed a metal detector over the pit and our spoil to see if we missed anything. When the pit had been refilled, we placed the turf back on top. We then took our finds to the finds hut where we cleaned, identified and recorded them. This enabled us to create some distribution maps that helped us to see where there might be large areas of finds and possible archaeological sites. Figure 2 – Distribution Maps of Shovel Test Pit Finds 3 The artefacts, ecofacts, bulk finds sheets and distribution maps were then placed into the archive. 4 Resistivity Survey A resistivity survey of the pre-surveyed area East of the barn of 60m x 30m was performed on 10/8/2005, with the purpose of evaluating any evidence of settlement at Eaton Barn field (TF 696 363) and training NILA students. The resistivity equipment used was a fixed twin-probe array with 500mm probe separation. 1m traverses were performed and readings taken at 1m intervals. Recent weather had been showery, and conditions during the survey were mainly bright with a few light showers during the afternoon session. The soil was sandy and damp, becoming increasingly chalky with increasing depth. During the survey, the background readings averaged around 50mΩ. The highest readings were 100mΩ and the lowest 30mΩ. Figure 3 – Resistivity Plot White areas are low resistivity, dark areas have high resistivity. North is at the top of the figure and the survey was carried out over the area of the grid marked in figure 1. The most obvious features apparent on the resultant resistivity plot were: 1) A linear, low resistivity region, extending from the NW corner (B3) to halfway along the Eastern border (H2). This is consistent with a visible surface animal track. 2) A possibly linear region of high resistivity is apparent in the easternmost northern quadrant, extending from approximately E3 to G2. 5 3) There was also an area of scattered higher resistance (C1-H1) in the southern half of the plot. On the ground, this region is a level area, possibly terraced. However this higher background activity could be an artefact due to the topography. The field slopes gently towards the river valley lying to the North. This slope is more pronounced towards the NW corner. The lower resistance in this corner could therefore be the result of the soil being more waterlogged here due to the slope. Survey The area of investigation was surveyed with two methods: a) electronic distance measurer (EDM) and b) dumpy level. A bench mark datum had been marked on the south wall of the barn. This was replicated on the south east corner so that it could be sited from a position east of the barn. Electronic measuring device This instrument operates by emitting a light beam which is reflected from the measuring pole back to the instrument. The instrument calculates northing, eastings and height. The instrument was set up on the datum bench mark sited directly over the south west corner of the grid (10 m square previously set up for the shovel test pits) and now extended for the geophysics by 10m to the east. This survey was extended north to include the ditch. The south west corner (origin) was given the co-ordinates of 0,0 so that the actual grid references could be later inserted into the plan mapping. Measurements were taken along the line of the main east west ditch and a path detected during the geophysical survey. Points were taken at each side and in the centre of the ditch and on both sides of the path. The EDM was sighted on the measuring pole at each measuring station and when the reflecting mirror was in the centre of the sight the ‘measure’ button was pressed and the EDM calculated the northings, eastings and height. These were recorded and plotted on tracing paper. Dumpy level Heights relative to the barn benchmark were measured at 2m intervals by laying a cloth tape north south starting a metre north of the field fence bordering Eaton Drove Road on grid lines ‘C’ and ‘G’. the dumpy level was set up in an area where the backsight to the benchmark and foresights to the points we wanted to be measured could both be seen.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Monday Walks # 13
    MONTHLY MONDAY WALKS # 13 MONDAY 3RD DECEMBER 2018 Start and Finish: King William Country House Hotel, Sedgeford. The owners of the Hotel kindly allowed us to use their car park. So if you are passing, call in for a drink or a meal—food is good—staff very friendly. Weather: It was our thirteenth group walk, so of course, poured it down. We had a short sunny spell around lunch time but for the rest of the time it was very heavy rain. But it was at least it was a warm 11 degrees. Walkers: Only the hardy this month!. Gus Williams, Paul Marcus Loveday and Barnaby the Dawg, Michelle Lillie, Mike Lane, Andy Haggith, Bernie and Ann Kerrison, Malcolm Page and Phil Beaumont. I list these names as they come to mind, there is no prefer- ence over and above the fact that I am always first on the list. I am the first to admit that the weather and underfoot conditions were not ideal for walking, but we all managed to arrive at the allotted place, at, or before the allotted time. The last to arrive was again Andy Haggith, but this time he has an excuse—he was travelling in a car driven by Malcom but navigated by me! For some reason I thought we were starting the walk in Cockley Cley, and insisted that we made our way via the A47 to Francham, it was only when I saw signposts to Cockley Cley that I real- ised that I was mistaken!!!! Silly Old Gussie. So, we were the last to arrive, but Andy was the last out of the car, so again, he was last to arrive.
    [Show full text]
  • River Restoration and Chalk Streams
    River Restoration and Chalk Streams Monday 22nd – Tuesday 23rd January 2001 University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB Organised by the River Restoration Centre in partnership with University of Hertfordshire Environment Agency, Thames Region Report compiled by: Vyv Wood-Gee Countryside Management Consultant Scabgill, Braehead, Lanark ML11 8HA Tel: 01555 870530 Fax: 01555 870050 E-mail: [email protected] Mobile: 07711 307980 ____________________________________________________________________________ River Restoration and Chalk Streams Page 1 Seminar Proceedings CONTENTS Page no. Introduction 3 Discussion Session 1: Flow Restoration 4 Discussion Session 2: Habitat Restoration 7 Discussion Session 3: Scheme Selection 9 Discussion Session 4: Post Project Appraisal 15 Discussion Session 5: Project Practicalities 17 Discussion Session 6: BAPs, Research and Development 21 Discussion Session 7: Resource Management 23 Discussion Session 8: Chalk streams and wetlands 25 Discussion Session 9: Conclusions and information dissemination 27 Site visit notes 29 Appendix I: Delegate list 35 Appendix II: Feedback 36 Appendix III: RRC Project Information Pro-forma 38 Appendix IV: Project summaries and contact details – listed 41 alphabetically by project name. ____________________________________________________________________________ River Restoration and Chalk Streams Page 2 Seminar Proceedings INTRODUCTION Workshop Objectives · To facilitate and encourage interchange of information, views and experiences between people working with projects and programmes with strong links to chalk streams and activities or research that affect this environment. · To improve the knowledge base on the practicalities and associated benefits of chalk stream restoration work in order to make future investments more cost effective. Participants The workshop was specifically targeted at individuals and organisations whose activities, research or interests include a specific practical focus on chalk streams.
    [Show full text]
  • South-D-1971-Phd-Thesis-Vol Ii.Pdf
    1V1 THE RECENT SEDIMENTOLOGY OF THE VEST NORFOLK COAST Derek South VOLUME II 1 8 CONTENTS VOLUME I vae_ Abstract 2 Acknowledgments 11 Chapter 1 Introduction 12 I The general setting of the area 12 II The Imperial College Research Project 12 III The present study 15 IV Previous research 16 1. The physiography and the sediments 16 2. The Fauna 17 3. The Flora 18 Chapter 2 The Geological and Geographical . Background of the Study Area 19 I The Geological setting 19 II L summary of the coastal physiography 22 III The geological history 24 IV The development of the region in recent times 27 1. The barrier coastline 27 a) Changes at Holme 27 b) Cliff recession at Hunstanton 31 2. The transitional area - the gravel ridge south of Hunstanton 31 3. The inner Wash area 32 a) Reclamations 32 b) The Great Ouse 34 4. The offshore area 37 5. General conclusions 37 Chapter 3 Research Techniques 39 I Field surveys-. 39 II Sampling of the sediments 39 1. The intertidal zone 39 a) Bulk samples 39 b) Undisturbed sediment samples 40 2. The offshore zone 41 III Other field techniques 41 1. Tidal current measurements 41 2. Sediment tracer tests. 41 190 IV Laboratory analysis of the sediments 43 1. Grain size techniques 43 a) The preliminary treatment of samples 43 Sieve analysis 44 Size classification 44 d) Errors in the aperture size of British Standard sieves 48 The pipette method 57 The calculation of results 57 2. The analysis of sediment composition 59 a) Laboratory procedure 59 b) Feldspar content 62 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Abstraction
    WRMP 2019 Technical Document: Sustainable Abstraction December 2019 Introduction PR14 NEP WFD No Option Selection Forward Look Invasive and Fish and Eel Article 4.7 Schemes Deterioration non-native species Passage This is a technical report that supports our WRMP submission. Anglian Water is committed to achieving sustainable levels of abstraction. This report provides an overview of our approach to sustainable abstraction in the 2019 WRMP, including our obligations under the Water Industry National Environment Programme (WINEP) and Water Framework Directive (WFD). 2 Introduction PR14 NEP WFD No Option Selection Forward Look Invasive and Fish and Eel Article 4.7 Schemes Deterioration non-native species Passage Contents Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 5 • 1.1 The Water Resources Management Plan 5 • 1.2 Overview 6 2. PR14 NEP Schemes 7 • 2.1 Coston Fen 7 • 2.2 River Wensum 7 • 2.3 North Norfolk Coast 7 3. WFD No Deterioration 8 • 3.1 Time Limited Licences 9 • 3.2 Permanent Licences 9 • 3.3 Abstraction Incentive Mechanism 9 4. Option Selection 10 • 4.1 Options Appraisals Approach 10 • 4.2 Customer Support 11 • 4.3 Future Exports 12 • 4.4 Sustainability Changes 12 • 4.5 Mitigation Options 18 5. Forward Look 19 • 5.1 Investigations and Options Appraisals 19 • 5.2 AMP8 Mitigation Schemes 19 • 5.3 Ants Broads and Marshes 19 6. Invasive and non-native species 20 • 6.1 Supply Side Options 20 • 6.2 Current Operations 20 7. Fish and Eel Passage 21 8. Article 4.7 21 3 Introduction PR14 NEP WFD No Option Selection Forward Look Invasive and Fish and Eel Article 4.7 Schemes Deterioration non-native species Passage Executive summary Anglian Water is committed to achieving sustainable the allowance for cessation of abstraction from levels of abstraction through a combination of our groundwater source near Catfield Fen in 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions 1986
    ^ t TRANSACTIONS of THE NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Vol. 27 Part 3 May 1986 ) TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY ISSN 0375 7226 Volume 27 Part 3 (May 1986) Editor A. G. Irwin OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY 1985-1986 President: Dr O. Rackham Vice-Presidents: P. R. Banham, A. L. Bull, K. B. Clarke, E. T. Daniels, K. C. Durrant, Dr E. A. Ellis, R. Jones, M. J. Seago, J. A. Steers, E. L. Swain, F. J. Taylor-Page Chairman: Dr G. D. Watts, Barn Meadow, Frost’s Lane, Gt. Moulton NR15 2HG Secretary: Dr R. E. Baker, 25 Southern Reach, Mulbarton NR14 8BU Asst. Secretary: R. N. Flowers, Heatherlands, The Street, Brundall Treasurer: D. A. Dorling, 6 New Road, Hethersett, Norwich NR9 3HH Asst. Treasurer: M. J. Woolner, 45 Gurney Road, Norwich NR5 OHH Membership Committee: R. Haney {Chairman), Miss J. Wakefield (Secretary Programme Committee: A. L. Bull {Chairman), Mrs J. Robinson {Secretary) Publications Committee: R. Jones {Chairman), Dr A. G. Irwin, M. J. Seago, R. Haney Research Committee: Dr A. J. Davy {Chairman), Mrs A. Brewster {Secretary) Hon. Auditor: J. E. Timbers, The Nook, Barford. Elected Members of Council: (Retiring 1986) Miss R. Carpenter, C. Dack, Mrs J. Geeson, R. Robinson (Retiring 1987) N. S. Carmichael, R. Evans, Mrs L. Evans, C. Neale (Retiring 1988) F. Farrow, A. Johnson, A. Scowen, Miss R. Walby Co-opted and Representative Members of Council: Dr Davy {University) and Dr Irwin {Museum) serve as officers. R. Hobbs {Norfolk Naturalists Trust), H. Ginn {Nature Conservancy Council) ORGANISERS OF PRINCIPAL SPECIALIST GROUPS Birds (Editor of the Report): M.
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Management Plan Anglian River Basin District
    River Basin Management Plan Anglian River Basin District Annex D: Protected area objectives Contents D.1 Introduction 2 D.2 Types and location of protected areas 3 D.3 Monitoring network 12 D.4 Objectives 19 D.5 Compliance (results of monitoring) including 22 actions (measures) for Surface Water Drinking Water Protected Areas and Natura 2000 Protected Areas D.6 Other information 118 D.1 Introduction The Water Framework Directive specifies that areas requiring special protection under other EC Directives and waters used for the abstraction of drinking water are identified as protected areas. These areas have their own objectives and standards. Article 4 of the Water Framework Directive requires Member States to achieve compliance with the standards and objectives set for each protected area by 22 December 2015, unless otherwise specified in the Community legislation under which the protected area was established. Some areas may require special protection under more than one EC Directive or may have additional (surface water and/or groundwater) objectives. In these cases, all the objectives and standards must be met. Article 6 requires Member States to establish a register of protected areas. The types of protected areas that must be included in the register are: • areas designated for the abstraction of water for human consumption (Drinking Water Protected Areas); • areas designated for the protection of economically significant aquatic species (Freshwater Fish and Shellfish); • bodies of water designated as recreational waters, including areas designated as Bathing Waters; • nutrient-sensitive areas, including areas identified as Nitrate Vulnerable Zones under the Nitrates Directive or areas designated as sensitive under Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (UWWTD); • areas designated for the protection of habitats or species where the maintenance or improvement of the status of water is an important factor in their protection including 1 relevant Natura 2000 sites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church, the Village and Its People, 1400-1500
    Wighton: the church, the village and its people, 1400-1500 Nicholas Andrew Trend Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of Art, Media and American Studies (AMA) September 2017 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. All Saints, Wighton from the east 2 Abstract When, how, by whom and in what circumstances were Norfolk’s medieval churches rebuilt in the long fifteenth century? Despite the importance of this extraordinary and historic burst of architectural creativity, the answers to these key questions have long proved elusive. A perceived lack of archaeological and documentary evidence has left historians largely in the dark. This thesis addresses the gap in our knowledge by focusing on a single church and village - All Saints in Wighton, near the north coast of the county. The choice of such an apparently narrow subject has allowed a sustained and intense focus on both the fabric of the building and the scattered, partial evidence which survives in the archives. And while the focus has been narrow, the approach taken has been broad and creative. It has included an analysis of masons’ marks, the counting of arch voussoirs, an unusually wide, eclectic and exhaustive collation and investigation of surviving documents, together with detailed comparisons with other churches in the vicinity. As such it aims to offer a new model for architectural and social historical research and - hopefully - it will be regarded as a success.
    [Show full text]
  • Babingley Catchment 8 Key Successes 2.1 Babingley Catchment – the Place 8 • 730 Followers on Twitter @9Chalkrivers
    9 Chalk River Project Community Engagement Report Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens “can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has. Margaret Mead ” Contents Summary of key engagement successes for the 9 Chalk Summary of key engagement successes for the 9 Chalk Rivers Project 1 Summary of river enhancements and community work 2 Rivers Project 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE 9 CHALK RIVERS PROJECT 4 Key issues 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Why the project was undertaken and the role of local communities 4 Lack of access to rivers, increased development, loss of green 1.3 Overall management of the project 5 space, pollution in the river, loss of habitat and a need for people to 1.4 The project team 5 get out into the wider countryside to learn about the local environ- 1.5 Location of rivers 6 ment, health of the rivers and their wildlife and how these could be 1.6 How community engagement has been measured through the project 6 improved, water quality, continued support for farming to maintain 1.7 Structure of this report 6 profitable production, silt, localised flooding and better understand- ing of the rivers and their catchments. 2. THE RIVERS 7 2. Babingley catchment 8 Key successes 2.1 Babingley catchment – The place 8 • 730 followers on Twitter @9ChalkRivers. 2.2 The community 9 2.3 Practical work to the river 9 • Over 500 people subscribed to the 9 Chalk 2.4 Events in the Babingley catchment 9 Rivers Project newsletter. 2.5 Results of engagement and future for the river 10 • Over 70 public events held covering all 9 river 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Roles and Status of Women in a Norfolk Small Market Town Heacham 1276-1324 Ca
    1 Jacques Beauroy CNRS-PARIS Social Roles and Status of Women in a Norfolk small market Town Heacham 1276-1324 ca. In contrast with other medieval serial sources concerned mostly with men English manorial court rolls recorded a high proportion of women appearing in court as plaintiffs or defendants in various misdemeanours and trespasses, in cases of conflicts with neighbours or the lord’s bailiffs. The court sessions showed women litigating about credit and debt, selling and buying land, paying merchet and heriot fines, etc. The publication, in 1996, of Medieval Society and the Manor Court emphazized the unique wealth of manorial court rolls for the study of legal and demographic history and other facets of the social structure of medieval rural society 1. Studies on the roles of women in medieval society have relied especially on the use of manorial court rolls2 . The 43 Heacham annual Leet court sessions, on which this paper is based, between 1276 and 1324, listed the women selling ale and bread on the market, paying the licensing taxes due to the Prior of Lewes, lord of the «soke» of Heacham, for the assize of bread and ale. They also listed chief pledges and elected manorial officials, tenants of the manor, who upheld the manor court proceedings and the 1Zvi Razi and Richard Smith (eds.), Medieval Society and the Manor Court, Oxford Un. Press, Oxford, 1996 . 2 Judith M. Bennett, Women in the Medieval English Countryside, Gender & Household in Brigstock before the Plague, Oxford, O.U.P., 1987 ; Marjorie K. McIntosh, Autonomy & Community The Royal Manor of Havering 1200-1500, vol.1, Cambridge Un.
    [Show full text]
  • North West Norfolk Catchment Management Plan
    NORTH WEST NORFOLK CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIRST ANNUAL REVIEW November 1995 - November 1996 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY - ANGLIAN REGION PLANNING AND CUSTOMER SERVICES (CENTRAL AREA) JUNE 1997 North West Norfolk CMP - Annual Review June 1997 If you have any views or require any further information, please contact: Brian Elsdon Planning and Customer Services Manager The Environment Agency - Anglian Region Central Area Bromholme Lane Brampton Huntingdon Cambs PE18 8NE Telephone: (01480) 414581 Fax : (01480) 435193 Other publications available in this series: The North West Norfolk CMP Consultation Report (March 1995). The North West Norfolk CMP Action Plan (November 1995). Page 1 North West Norfolk CMP - Annual Review June 1997 Page No CONTENTS Draft Mission Statement 4 Vision Statement 4 1.0 Introduction 5 1.1 The Role of the Environment Agency 5 1.2 Catchment Management Planning 5 1.3 The Development of LEAPS 6 1.4 Monitoring the Plan 6 1.5 The Purpose of the Annual Review 7 2.0 Catchment Overview 8 2.1 Catchment Area Map 3.0 Development and Planning 10 3.1 Development Plans 10 3.2 Environmental Planning 10 3.3 Housing and Economic Development 11 3.4 Roads 12 3.5 Other Proposed Development 12 4.0 Summary of Progress 12 4.1 Notable Occurrences and Achievements 12 4.2 Notable Disappointments 12 5.0 Waste Issues 13 5.1 Operational Landfill Sites 15 5.2 Undeveloped Landfill Sites 16 5.3 Landfill Sites where Operations have Ceased 16 5.4 Closed Landfill Sites 16 5.5 Licensed/Exempt Scrap Yards 16 5.6 Licensed Transfer Stations 16 6.0 Integrated
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Water Quality and Wastewater Treatment
    Creating the environment for business 6. Water Quality and Wastewater Treatment 6.1 Introduction This section considers the capacity of the water environment to receive wastewater discharges without detrimental effects, or non compliance with environmental standards, and assesses the capacity of the existing wastewater infrastructure to collect and treat wastewater in relation to the proposed housing growth. Anglian Water Services (AWS) is the statutory (but not sole) provider for wastewater in the Borough of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk. There are 24 WwTWs serving the Borough of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk (Figure 6.13). Three WwTWs also serve areas outside the Borough: West Walton WwTW serving Wisbech in Fenland District, and Sculthorpe and Barton Bendish WwTWs serving rural areas to the east of the study area. Future housing development in the wider Wisbech area means that this growth also needs to be considered in the assessment of West Walton WwTW. The Sculthorpe and Barton Bendish WwTW catchments cover rural areas outside the Borough boundary and are, therefore, not considered further in this assessment. Figure 6.1 also shows the catchment areas of the WwTWs which indicates that some areas of the Borough are outside the sewered catchments and properties in these areas are, therefore, assumed to be served by cesspits and septic tanks. The assessment presented in the Section is focussed on the WwTWs listed in Table 6.1. Wastewater from a large proportion of the planned growth will be served by King’s Lynn, Downham Market, Heacham and West Walton WwTWs. Several WwTWs have exceeded their current consented Dry Weather Flows and, therefore, have no capacity to receive additional flows unless the consent is modified.
    [Show full text]