The Church, the Village and Its People, 1400-1500

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Church, the Village and Its People, 1400-1500 Wighton: the church, the village and its people, 1400-1500 Nicholas Andrew Trend Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of Art, Media and American Studies (AMA) September 2017 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. All Saints, Wighton from the east 2 Abstract When, how, by whom and in what circumstances were Norfolk’s medieval churches rebuilt in the long fifteenth century? Despite the importance of this extraordinary and historic burst of architectural creativity, the answers to these key questions have long proved elusive. A perceived lack of archaeological and documentary evidence has left historians largely in the dark. This thesis addresses the gap in our knowledge by focusing on a single church and village - All Saints in Wighton, near the north coast of the county. The choice of such an apparently narrow subject has allowed a sustained and intense focus on both the fabric of the building and the scattered, partial evidence which survives in the archives. And while the focus has been narrow, the approach taken has been broad and creative. It has included an analysis of masons’ marks, the counting of arch voussoirs, an unusually wide, eclectic and exhaustive collation and investigation of surviving documents, together with detailed comparisons with other churches in the vicinity. As such it aims to offer a new model for architectural and social historical research and - hopefully - it will be regarded as a success. The research has identified a reliable chronology for the nave and chancel of All Saints, estimated the cost of its construction and established the most likely model of fundraising needed to raise that money. It has reconstructed the village economy and its community in some detail and identified and profiled the individuals who were most likely to have paid for the project. Lastly, as a consequence of its investigations, it has proposed significant revisions in the date of important stained glass at All Saints and several other Norfolk churches. 3 The nave of All Saints, Wighton 4 Contents Preface .................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 9 Chapter One: the dating and construction of the fabric ..................................... 15 Chapter Two: the windows and the stained glass ................................................ 47 Chapter Three: economy and society, 1400-1500 ............................................. 101 Chapter Four: the village and the parishioners .................................................. 131 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 169 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................... 174 Bibliography ....................................................................................................... 175 Appendix One: Evidence for dating churches with shared masons’ marks ....... 194 Appendix Two: The Gigges family (1383-1506) ......................................... 198-203 Maps and plates Maps ................................................................................................................... 206 Historic images of Wighton church ................................................................... 208 The church today ............................................................................................... 210 Examples of masons’ marks ............................................................................... 212 The stained glass at Wighton ...................................................................... 214-240 5 Preface Few of our parochial country churches have any remarks or memorials left of their particular founders, or the time of their building… our ignorance in this case is owing to the great length of time since their foundation, the many alterations and additions that have been made in the churches themselves, and the great disorders and confusions that have happened since the time of their foundation, which have not only defaced and ruined the records and evidences, but even the marble stones and brasses, which would have given us a clear light. Francis Blomefield,c. 17501 On a grey September day in 2014 a funeral was held in All Saints church, Wighton, a small village three miles from the north Norfolk coast. The deceased, a man named Dennis Seaman, had been born in Little Walsingham, the next door village, in 1930. He had married a woman from Wighton and had lived there for the rest of his life. He was born before electricity came to the village, when the windmill was still standing, the local school still held classes, and at a time when tractors were rare, much of the land was still worked with horses, the crops were hoed by hand, and harvest was an event requiring the combined efforts of the entire community. In short, he was one of the last surviving villagers to have witnessed life in this part of Norfolk before the widespread industrialisation of agriculture, the growth of consumerism and the pursuit of leisure changed it fundamentally. Remarkably, he was also a member of the first generation to have witnessed a major reconstruction of the church for more than five centuries. Dennis, who worked in the building trade, had been chairman of the parish council for over 50 years, was church warden for 40 years 1 Blomefield 1805-10, vol. 6, 222. 6 and served on the Parochial Church Council even longer. He was on the PCC when the medieval tower of All Saints collapsed in 1965 and was one of those who had overseen its reconstruction in 1975-76. This was funded by the near miraculous intervention of a Canadian businessman, Leeds Richardson, who was visiting Wighton to look for the graves of his forbears and, shocked by the stunted state of the tower, determined to pay to have it rebuilt. In his will, Dennis, a religious man, had asked that his body rest overnight in the nave on the eve of his funeral, a rare throwback to an old tradition. He was buried near the western entrance to the graveyard and, on the day before the service, warm from his work, the gravedigger talked to me volubly of the bones he had unearthed while digging. It was disconcertingly reminiscent of the opening of Act Five of Hamlet. There was no Yorick, but among others, he had found a child’s skull and he claimed to have dug through two or three earlier burials. Perhaps among those bones were the mortal remains of some of the villagers who, six centuries earlier, had witnessed the transformation of All Saints. It had, like many parish churches in England, been entirely remodelled in the fifteenth century, with a new nave and chancel, much bigger windows and a high clerestory which flooded the building with light. Little is known about the details of medieval funerals. The service for Dennis Seaman certainly owed much more to the traditions of the Victorian Church of England than to those of the fifteenth-century Church of Rome. But it was part of the same historical continuum and the extremely unusual sight of a full nave, the traditional burial in the graveyard, some 200 or 300 mourners filing out of the porch to witness the committal, and the unearthing of the bones of villagers past, was a rare moment when that continuum was explicitly highlighted. The funeral came halfway through the research for this thesis and, for me, it confirmed two key instincts which lie behind it. The first is a sense of the physical importance of the church and its graveyard to the history of the village. Wighton is now an insignificant place. Many of its houses are used as holiday accommodation and, typically, barely a dozen people turn out for church services. The time when All Saints was the fulcrum of local life - of birth, death and marriage, of holidays and festivals, of moral instruction and spiritual comfort, of shared values and communal efforts - has all but faded. Very likely the importance of the church to the village will wain further. But for the time being, it remains as the only surviving monument to an era when most people were born, lived and died in the same community and, in the case of Wighton, a time when it was one of the most prosperous and populous villages in the vicinity. The second instinct which inspired this thesis is a desire to reconnect our understanding of the fabric of such buildings with the people who originally constructed and used them. It is a connection which has long been overlooked, but which has proved to be fertile ground - both as a way of understanding a fifteenth-century Norfolk village, and the rebuilding of its church. 7 Acknowledgements For Sophie I am especially indebted to my supervisors at the University of East Anglia: Professors Sandy Heslop and Mark Bailey, whose patience and positivity have known no bounds. Many others have helped me over the last seven years including especially: Sophia Kral, Dr Anthony Smith, Dr Elizabeth Rutledge, Beatrice Rae-Smith, Dave Bescoby,
Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Monday Walks # 13
    MONTHLY MONDAY WALKS # 13 MONDAY 3RD DECEMBER 2018 Start and Finish: King William Country House Hotel, Sedgeford. The owners of the Hotel kindly allowed us to use their car park. So if you are passing, call in for a drink or a meal—food is good—staff very friendly. Weather: It was our thirteenth group walk, so of course, poured it down. We had a short sunny spell around lunch time but for the rest of the time it was very heavy rain. But it was at least it was a warm 11 degrees. Walkers: Only the hardy this month!. Gus Williams, Paul Marcus Loveday and Barnaby the Dawg, Michelle Lillie, Mike Lane, Andy Haggith, Bernie and Ann Kerrison, Malcolm Page and Phil Beaumont. I list these names as they come to mind, there is no prefer- ence over and above the fact that I am always first on the list. I am the first to admit that the weather and underfoot conditions were not ideal for walking, but we all managed to arrive at the allotted place, at, or before the allotted time. The last to arrive was again Andy Haggith, but this time he has an excuse—he was travelling in a car driven by Malcom but navigated by me! For some reason I thought we were starting the walk in Cockley Cley, and insisted that we made our way via the A47 to Francham, it was only when I saw signposts to Cockley Cley that I real- ised that I was mistaken!!!! Silly Old Gussie. So, we were the last to arrive, but Andy was the last out of the car, so again, he was last to arrive.
    [Show full text]
  • Return of Result of Uncontested Election
    RETURN OF RESULT OF UNCONTESTED ELECTION North Norfolk Election of Councillors for Aldborough and Thurgarton on Thursday 7 May 2015 I, Sheila Oxtoby, being the Returning Officer for the of ALDBOROUGH AND THURGARTON at an Election of Councillors for the said report that the latest time for delivery of notices of withdrawal of candidature, namely Thursday 9 April 2015, having passed, the persons whose names appear in the accompanying list stood validly nominated and were duly elected without a contest. Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) BAILLIE The Bays, Chapel Road, Tony Thurgarton, Norwich, NR11 7NP ELLIOTT Sunholme, The Green, Paul Martin Aldborough, NR11 7AA GALLANT Spring Cottage, The Green, David Peter Aldborough, NR11 7AA WHEELER 4 Pipits Meadow, Aldborough, Jean Elizabeth NR11 7NW WORDINGHAM Two Oaks, Thurgarton Road, Peter Aldborough, NR11 7NY Dated Thursday 16 April 2015 Sheila Oxtoby Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Electoral Services, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, Norfolk, NR27 9EN RETURN OF RESULT OF UNCONTESTED ELECTION North Norfolk Election of Councillors for Antingham on Thursday 7 May 2015 I, Sheila Oxtoby, being the Returning Officer for the of ANTINGHAM at an Election of Councillors for the said report that the latest time for delivery of notices of withdrawal of candidature, namely Thursday 9 April 2015, having passed, the persons whose names appear in the accompanying list stood validly nominated and were duly elected without a contest. Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) EVERSON Margra, Southrepps Road, Graham Fredrick Antingham, North Walsham, NR28 0NP JONES The Old Coach House, Antingham Independent Graham Hall, Cromer Road, Antingham, N.
    [Show full text]
  • The 150Th Anniversary of the Royal Hospital for Neuro-Disability, Putney
    426 HISTORY OF MEDICINE Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.2003.017350 on 14 July 2004. Downloaded from Caring for ‘‘incurables’’: the 150th anniversary of the Royal Hospital for Neuro-Disability, Putney G C Cook ............................................................................................................................... Postgrad Med J 2004;80:426–430. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2003.017673 The Royal Hospital for Incurables (RHI), now known as the care of these unfortunate individuals. This fact had been made clear in Household Words in 1850. Royal Hospital for Neuro-Disability and situated on West This weekly journal, with Charles Dickens Hill, Putney, was founded by Andrew Reed DD exactly 150 (1812–70) as its editor, considered: years ago. The RHI was thus the pioneer in modern times of long stay institutions for the sick and dying. It became one ‘‘It is an extraordinary fact that among of the great Victorian charities, and remained independent innumerable medical charities with which this country abounds, there is not one for the help of the National Health Service, which was introduced in of those who of all others [that is, the 1948. Originally the long stay patients suffered from a ‘‘incurables’’] most require succour …’’. multiplicity of diseases; in recent years chronic neurological disease has dominated the scenario. This institution has It is probable that Dickens was merely reflect- ing (as he often did) the popular opinion of the also become a major centre for genetic and trauma- time. In any event, Dickens took a keen interest associated neurological damage, and rehabilitation. in Reed’s initiative and presided at the first two ........................................................................... charity dinners, the prime object of which was to raise much needed funds for this unique venture.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Share Report
    PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS For period ended 30th September 2019 SUMMARY OF PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS BY DEANERIES Dean Amount % Deanery Share Received for 2019 % Deanery Share % No Outstanding 2018 2019 to period end 2018 Received for 2018 received £ £ £ £ £ Norwich Archdeaconry 06 Norwich East 23,500 4.41 557,186 354,184 63.57 532,380 322,654 60.61 04 Norwich North 47,317 9.36 508,577 333,671 65.61 505,697 335,854 66.41 05 Norwich South 28,950 7.21 409,212 267,621 65.40 401,270 276,984 69.03 Norfolk Archdeaconry 01 Blofield 37,303 11.04 327,284 212,276 64.86 338,033 227,711 67.36 11 Depwade 46,736 16.20 280,831 137,847 49.09 288,484 155,218 53.80 02 Great Yarmouth 44,786 9.37 467,972 283,804 60.65 478,063 278,114 58.18 13 Humbleyard 47,747 11.00 437,949 192,301 43.91 433,952 205,085 47.26 14 Loddon 62,404 19.34 335,571 165,520 49.32 322,731 174,229 53.99 15 Lothingland 21,237 3.90 562,194 381,997 67.95 545,102 401,890 73.73 16 Redenhall 55,930 17.17 339,813 183,032 53.86 325,740 187,989 57.71 09 St Benet 36,663 9.24 380,642 229,484 60.29 396,955 243,433 61.33 17 Thetford & Rockland 31,271 10.39 314,266 182,806 58.17 300,933 192,966 64.12 Lynn Archdeaconry 18 Breckland 45,799 11.97 397,811 233,505 58.70 382,462 239,714 62.68 20 Burnham & Walsingham 63,028 15.65 396,393 241,163 60.84 402,850 256,123 63.58 12 Dereham in Mitford 43,605 12.03 353,955 223,631 63.18 362,376 208,125 57.43 21 Heacham & Rising 24,243 6.74 377,375 245,242 64.99 359,790 242,156 67.30 22 Holt 28,275 8.55 327,646 207,089 63.21 330,766 214,952 64.99 23 Lynn 10,805 3.30 330,152 196,022 59.37 326,964 187,510 57.35 07 Repps 0 0.00 383,729 278,123 72.48 382,728 285,790 74.67 03 08 Ingworth & Sparham 27,983 6.66 425,260 239,965 56.43 420,215 258,960 61.63 727,583 9.28 7,913,818 4,789,282 60.52 7,837,491 4,895,456 62.46 01/10/2019 NORWICH DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LTD DEANERY HISTORY REPORT MONTH September YEAR 2019 SUMMARY PARISH 2017 OUTST.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Tax Rates 2020 - 2021
    BRECKLAND COUNCIL NOTICE OF SETTING OF COUNCIL TAX Notice is hereby given that on the twenty seventh day of February 2020 Breckland Council, in accordance with Section 30 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, approved and duly set for the financial year beginning 1st April 2020 and ending on 31st March 2021 the amounts as set out below as the amount of Council Tax for each category of dwelling in the parts of its area listed below. The amounts below for each parish will be the Council Tax payable for the forthcoming year. COUNCIL TAX RATES 2020 - 2021 A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H NORFOLK COUNTY 944.34 1101.73 1259.12 1416.51 1731.29 2046.07 2360.85 2833.02 KENNINGHALL 1194.35 1393.40 1592.46 1791.52 2189.63 2587.75 2985.86 3583.04 NORFOLK POLICE & LEXHAM 1182.24 1379.28 1576.32 1773.36 2167.44 2561.52 2955.60 3546.72 175.38 204.61 233.84 263.07 321.53 379.99 438.45 526.14 CRIME COMMISSIONER BRECKLAND 62.52 72.94 83.36 93.78 114.62 135.46 156.30 187.56 LITCHAM 1214.50 1416.91 1619.33 1821.75 2226.58 2631.41 3036.25 3643.49 LONGHAM 1229.13 1433.99 1638.84 1843.70 2253.41 2663.12 3072.83 3687.40 ASHILL 1212.28 1414.33 1616.37 1818.42 2222.51 2626.61 3030.70 3636.84 LOPHAM NORTH 1192.57 1391.33 1590.09 1788.85 2186.37 2583.90 2981.42 3577.70 ATTLEBOROUGH 1284.23 1498.27 1712.31 1926.35 2354.42 2782.50 3210.58 3852.69 LOPHAM SOUTH 1197.11 1396.63 1596.15 1795.67 2194.71 2593.74 2992.78 3591.34 BANHAM 1204.41 1405.14 1605.87 1806.61 2208.08 2609.55 3011.01 3613.22 LYNFORD 1182.24 1379.28 1576.32 1773.36 2167.44 2561.52 2955.60 3546.72
    [Show full text]
  • Sheringham Carnival Post Offices in Aylsham and Holt
    Issue 420 Free Fortnightly 1st Mar 2019 The Holt www.holtchronicle.co.uk Salthouse Mallard Photograph: Heather Hipson Serving Holt, Sheringham, Wells, Fakenham and surrounding villages From Holt Consulting Rooms Bowen Technique - Springtime, Birds and Buds THE HOLT CHRONICLE Springtime is approaching fast. The birds are singing, buds are budding and the The deadline for Issue 421 is garden is calling. Make Bowen part of your warm up for springtime gardening; Noon on Tuesday 3rd March along with the weather you need to warm up too and take care not to overdo it. I speak from experience as last year around springtime I treated many backs, Please send articles for publication, forthcoming event shoulders, necks and knees resulting from over-enthusiastic digging, pruning and details, ‘For Sale’ adverts, etc. by e-mail to info@ weeding. holtchronicle.co.uk or leave in our collection box in You maintain your garden equipment... you clean it, oil it, replace broken bits... your body needs the same general maintenance. You may have acquired a small Feeney’s Newsagents , Market Place, Holt. injury from last season which Bowen may help to realign giving you the benefit Your Editor is Jo who can be contacted on 01263 821463 . of movement. We can also arrange DELIVERY OF LEAFLETS - delivery Top tips: starts at just 3p per insertion of an A4/A5 sheet. 1. Do a quick warm up – Always begin with a warm up, a brisk walk to get your Advertising in THE HOLT CHRONICLE could promote heart pumping and blood flowing your business way beyond your expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • River Glaven State of the Environment Report
    The River Glaven A State of the Environment Report ©Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative ©Evelyn Simak and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence Commons Licence © Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this C reative ©Oliver Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence Commons Licence Produced by Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service Spring 201 4 i Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service (NBIS) is a Local Record Centre holding information on species, GEODIVERSITY , habitats and protected sites for the county of Norfolk. For more information see our website: www.nbis.org.uk This report is available for download from the NBIS website www.nbis.org.uk Report written by Lizzy Oddy, March 2014. Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank the following people for their help and input into this report: Mark Andrews (Environment Agency); Anj Beckham (Norfolk County Council Historic Environment Service); Andrew Cannon (Natural Surroundings); Claire Humphries (Environment Agency); Tim Jacklin (Wild Trout Trust); Kelly Powell (Norfolk County Council Historic Environment Service); Carl Sayer (University College London); Ian Shepherd (River Glaven Conservation Group); Mike Sutton-Croft (Norfolk Non-native Species Initiative); Jonah Tosney (Norfolk Rivers Trust) Cover Photos Clockwise from top left: Wiveton Bridge (©Evelyn Simak and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); Glandford Ford (©Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); River Glaven above Glandford (©Oliver Dixon and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence); Swan at Glandford Ford (© Ashley Dace and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence). ii CONTENTS Foreword – Gemma Clark, 9 Chalk Rivers Project Community Involvement Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • Marchoness of Townshend
    The Marchioness of Townshend Alexander Walker /E Amin strathspey A min G Amin /G ¢ ¢ œ. œ. c j œ. œ œ. œ. œ œ œ. œ œ. œ œ œœ. œ . & œœœ. œ œ. œ. œ œ œ. œœœ œ Amin G œ. Aminœ /G J j œ. j œ /E Amin œ œ ¢ £ œ. œ œ œ. œ œ. œ. œ œ. œ œ. œ œ. j œ œ œ. œ œ. œ œ. œ œ œœœ œ. œ. œ œ œ œ œ œœ œ. œ Amin G Amin C j /G /E Amin œ j . œ ¢ . œ j œ œ œ œ œ œ. œ. œ œ. œ œ œ. œ œ . œœ œ œ. œ œ. œ œ. œ. œ œ œ œœ œ œ œ œ J MARCHIONESS OF TOWNSHEND, THE. œ. Walker: A Collection of Strathspeys, Reels, Marches, &c., 1866; No. 30, pg. 12. Scottish, Strathspey. A Minor, AAB. i. Gordon Coté, cassette, c.1994. The Marchioness referred to in this tune is Anne Elizabeth Clementina (née Duff), who married John Villiers Stuart Townshend, 5th Marquess Townshend on 17 October 1865. Anne Elizabeth Duff (b. 16 Aug 1847, d. 31 Dec 1925) was the second daughter of James Duff, 5th Earl Fife and Lady Agnes Georgiana Elizabeth Hay. Her brother Alexander William George Duff, 1st Duke married Louise Victoria Alexandra Dagmar Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, Princess Royal of the United Kingdom, and Queen Victoria’s daughter. The Marquess of Townshend is a title in the Peerage of Great Britain held by the Townshend family of Raynham Hall in Norfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List Of
    County Town Title Film/Fiche # Item # Norfolk Benefices, List of 1471412 It 44 Norfolk Census 1851 Index 6115160 Norfolk Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It 1 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1811-1825 375230 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1825-1839 375231 Norfolk Marriage Allegations Index 1839-1859 375232 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1715-1734 1596461 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1734-1749 1596462 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1770-1774 1596563 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1774-1781 1596564 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1790-1797 1596566 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1798-1803 1596567 Norfolk Marriage Bonds 1812-1819 1596597 Norfolk Marriages Parish Registers 1539-1812 496683 It 2 Norfolk Probate Inventories Index 1674-1825 1471414 It 17-20 Norfolk Tax Assessments 1692-1806 1471412 It 30-43 Norfolk Wills V.101 1854-1857 167184 Norfolk Alburgh Parish Register Extracts 1538-1715 894712 It 5 Norfolk Alby Parish Records 1600-1812 1526778 It 15 Norfolk Aldeby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 6 Norfolk Alethorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Arminghall Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Ashby Church Records 1725-1812 1526786 It 7 Norfolk Ashby Parish Register Extracts 1646 894712 It 5 Norfolk Ashwell-Thorpe Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Aslacton Census 1841 438851 Norfolk Baconsthorpe Parish Register Extracts 1676-1770 894712 It 6 Norfolk Bagthorpe Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Bale Census 1841 438862 Norfolk Bale Parish Register Extracts 1538-1716 894712 It 6 Norfolk Barmer Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barney Census 1841 438859 Norfolk Barton-Bendish Church Records 1725-1812 1526807 It
    [Show full text]
  • The Cromer Moraine
    THE CROMER MORAINE - A STUDY OF ITS PROGRESSIVE RECLAMATION ELIZABETH LANGTON ProQuest Number: 10097240 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10097240 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ilBSTRAGT The Cromer Moraine forms a distinctive geographical region near the coast of the northern part of the County of Norfolk. A pro­ nounced characteristic of this region is the vridespread cover of heatb-land, far less extensive than in former times. This heathland appears in its turn to have developed from an original woodland cover which was destroyed by the depredations of man and his domesticated animals . It has been necessary first to delimit the region as accurately as possible and this has been accomplished by means of a detailed study of local topography and of well-sections. The earliest evidence of the location of heathland comes from tlie Domesday Survey and this has been confirmed by references to heathland in various other documents dovm to 1750. By the middle of the eighteenth century the new developments in agriculture^ or ’Norfolk Husbandry’ as it was called, became widely known and practised, resulting in this region in a greatly accelerated reclama­ tion of heathland; so that by the time of the Tithe Survey (183S-42) less than a hundred years later over 4000 acres of heath had been reclaimed.
    [Show full text]