Insecta: Coleoptera: Polyphaga) De La Argentina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Insecta: Coleoptera: Polyphaga) De La Argentina Tesis Doctoral Morfología, sistemática, filogenia y bionomía de Scirtidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Polyphaga) de la Argentina Libonatti, María Laura 2016 Este documento forma parte de la colección de tesis doctorales y de maestría de la Biblioteca Central Dr. Luis Federico Leloir, disponible en digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar. Su utilización debe ser acompañada por la cita bibliográfica con reconocimiento de la fuente. This document is part of the doctoral theses collection of the Central Library Dr. Luis Federico Leloir, available in digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar. It should be used accompanied by the corresponding citation acknowledging the source. Cita tipo APA: Libonatti, María Laura. (2016). Morfología, sistemática, filogenia y bionomía de Scirtidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Polyphaga) de la Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/tesis_n6067_Libonatti Cita tipo Chicago: Libonatti, María Laura. "Morfología, sistemática, filogenia y bionomía de Scirtidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Polyphaga) de la Argentina". Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad de Buenos Aires. 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/tesis_n6067_Libonatti Dirección: Biblioteca Central Dr. Luis F. Leloir, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Contacto: [email protected] Intendente Güiraldes 2160 - C1428EGA - Tel. (++54 +11) 4789-9293 UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental Morfología, sistemática, filogenia y bionomía de Scirtidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Polyphaga) de la Argentina Tesis presentada para optar por el título de Doctor de la Universidad de Buenos Aires en el área: CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS María Laura Libonatti Directores de tesis: Dr. Mariano C. Michat Dr. Miguel Archangelsky Consejero de estudios: Dr. Axel O. Bachmann Lugar de trabajo: Laboratorio de Entomología, IBBEA, CONICET-UBA. Buenos Aires, marzo 2016 Morfología, sistemática, filogenia y bionomía de Scirtidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Polyphaga) de la Argentina Se presenta una revisión exhaustiva de las especies de escarabajos de pantano (Insecta: Coleoptera: Scirtidae) que habitan en la Argentina. Se estudió detalladamente la morfología de la familia y de los distintos géneros, se describieron o redescribieron todas las especies halladas en el país, sobre la base de la observación de material tipo, estudiado in situ en museos o pedido en préstamo a dichas instituciones, material colectado en viajes de campaña o recibido en donación. Se incluyen ilustraciones del hábito y de los genitales masculinos y femeninos, datos actualizados sobre la distribución y una discusión taxonómica para cada especie. Además, se proponen claves para la identificación de los adultos a nivel genérico y específico, se analizan las relaciones filogenéticas de la familia incluyendo 49 géneros de Scirtidae y 62 caracteres de la morfología imaginal, y se proveen datos sobre la bionomía de la familia. Se hallaron seis géneros: Contacyphon Gozis, Ora Clark, Scirtes Illiger, Prionocyphon Redtenbacher, Pseudomicrocara Armstrong e Ypsiloncyphon Klausnitzer; estos últimos tres se registran por primera vez de la Argentina. Microcara Thomson es excluido de la Argentina porque M. fueguensis Bourgeois fue ubicada erróneamente en dicho género. Se reconocieron 41 especies, de las cuales 12 se habían citado con anterioridad en este país, 16 son especies nuevas para la ciencia y nueve se citan por primera vez para el territorio argentino (Contacyphon cadornai Pic, C. maculatus Solier, Ora atroapicalis Pic, O. bivittata Pic, O. depressa (Fabricius), O. semibrunnea Pic, Prionocyphon samueli Klausnitzer, Pseudomicrocara obliquata (Solier) y Scirtes rufobinotatus Pic). Una especie de Contacyphon, una de Ora y dos especies de Scirtes no pudieron ser identificadas. Contacyphon robusticorne Pic no pudo ser incluida en el presente estudio dado que no pudo hallarse el holotipo. Se designa un lectotipo para Ora bruchi Pic, se propone elevar al nivel de especie a Scirtes adustus diversenotatus Pic, S. brevenotatus mediolineatus Pic y S. brevenotatus wagneri Pic. Asimismo, se proponen las siguientes nuevas combinaciones: Ora mediolineata (Pic) comb. n., O. wagneri (Pic) comb. n., Pseudomicrocara antarctica (Fairmaire) comb. n., P. obliquata (Solier) comb. n. y P. patagonica (Curtis) comb. n. Las conclusiones más relevantes del análisis cladístico son: el origen polifilético de Scirtidae tal como está definida actualmente, la monofilia de Scirtinae, la relación cercana entre Contacyphon y Prionocyphon, el origen monofilético de los saltadores, la relación hermana entre Ora y Scirtes, el anidamiento de Pseudomicrocara dentro un clado de géneros australianos y la relación distante entre Ypsiloncyphon y Contacyphon. Este trabajo representa un incremento significativo del conocimiento acerca de la morfología, la diversidad, la filogenia y la bionomía de Scirtidae de la Argentina y es el primero en América del Sur en abordar profundamente esta temática. Palabras claves: Coleoptera, Polyphaga, Scirtidae, escarabajos de pantano, taxonomía, nuevas especies, nuevas combinaciones, nuevos registros, Argentina Morphology, systematics, phylogeny, and bionomics of Scirtidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Polyphaga) from Argentina A comprehensive revision of the species of marsh beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Scirtidae) inhabiting Argentina is presented. The morphology of the family and the different genera was studied in detail, all the species found in the country were described or redescribed based on examination of type material, either studied in situ in museums or borrowed from those institutions, material collected in field trips or received as donation. Illustrations of habitus of male and female genitalia, updated information about distribution, and a taxonomic discussion for each species are included. Moreover, keys for the identification of adults at generic and specific levels are proposed, the phylogenetic relationships of the family are analysed including 49 genera of Scirtidae and 62 characters of adult morphology, and bionomical data of the family are provided. Six genera were found: Contacyphon Gozis, Ora Clark, Scirtes Illiger, Prionocyphon Redtenbacher, Pseudomicrocara Armstrong and Ypsiloncyphon Klausnitzer; the latter three are recorded for the first time from Argentina. Microcara Thomson is excluded from Argentina since M. fueguensis Bourgeois was misplaced in that genus. Forty-one species were recognized, of which 12 had already been cited in this country, 17 are new species, and nine are first cited from Argentina (Contacyphon cadornai Pic, C. maculatus Solier, Ora atroapicalis Pic, O. bivittata Pic, O. depressa (Fabricius), O. semibrunnea Pic, Prionocyphon samueli Klausnitzer, Pseudomicrocara obliquata (Solier) and Scirtes rufobinotatus Pic). One species of Contacyphon, one of Ora and two species of Scirtes and could not be identified. Contacyphon robusticorne Pic could not be included since its holotype was not found. A lectotype is designated for Ora bruchi Pic. Scirtes adustus diversenotatus Pic, S. brevenotatus mediolineatus Pic and S. brevenotatus wagneri Pic are raised to species level. Additionally, the following new combinations are proposed: Ora mediolineata (Pic) comb. n., O. wagneri (Pic) comb. n., Pseudomicrocara antarctica (Fairmaire) comb. n., P. obliquata (Solier) comb. n. and P. patagonica (Curtis) comb. n. The most relevant conclusions of the cladistic analysis are: polyphyletic origin of Scirtidae as presently defined, monophyly of Scirtinae, close relationship between Contacyphon and Prionocyphon, monophyletic origin of saltatorial Scirtidae, sister group relationship between Ora and Scirtes, nesting of Pseudomicrocara within a clade of Australian genera, and distant relationship between Ypsiloncyphon and Contacyphon. This work represents a significant increase in knowledge on the morphology, diversity, and bionomics of Scirtidae from Argentina and is the first one in South America in addressing the subject thoroughly. Key words: Coleoptera, Polyphaga, Scirtidae, marsh beetles, taxonomy, new species, new combinations, new records, Argentina Índice de contenidos 1. Introducción………………………………………………………………..................... 1 1.1. Presentación………………………………………………………………………….. 1 1.2. Antecedentes históricos………………………………………………………………. 1 1.2.1. Nominación de la familia…………………………………………………………... 1 1.2.2. Estudios sistemáticos sobre la familia Scirtidae a nivel mundial…………………... 2 1.2.3. Estudios sistemáticos sobre la familia Scirtidae en el neótropico………………….. 3 1.2.4. Estudios sistemáticos sobre la familia Scirtidae en la Argentina…………………... 9 1.2.5. Estudios sobre la filogenia y la clasificación………………………………….…… 11 1.3. Objetivos……………………………………………………....................................... 11 2. Materiales y métodos.…………………………………………………………….……. 11 2.1. Área de estudio y procedencia del material………………………………….………. 11 2.2. Técnicas de colecta……………………………………………………….…………... 12 2.3. Técnicas de cría………………………………...……………………….……………. 13 2.4. Estimación del número de estadios larvales…………………………….……………. 14 2.5. Depositarios…………………………….……………………………….……………. 14 2.6. Identificación taxonómica…………………………………………….……………… 14 2.7. Técnicas de disección………………………………………………….…….……….. 18 2.8. Técnicas de ilustración…...…………….……………………...................................... 18 2.9. Descripciones…………….…………………………….……...................................... 18 2.10. Terminología………....………………………………………………………..........
Recommended publications
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Psephenidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) Based on Larval, Pupal and Adult Characters
    Systematic Entomology (2007), 32, 502–538 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2006.00374.x Phylogeny of Psephenidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) based on larval, pupal and adult characters CHI-FENG LEE1 , MASATAKA SATOˆ2 , WILLIAM D. SHEPARD3 and M A N F R E D A . J A¨CH4 1Institute of Biodiversity, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, 2Dia Cuore 306, Kamegahora 3-1404, Midoriku, Nagoya, 458-0804, Japan, 3Essig Museum of Entomology, 201 Wellman Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A., and 4Natural History Museum, Burgring 7, A-1010 Wien, Austria Abstract. We conducted the first comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Pse- phenidae, based on 143 morphological characters of adults, larvae and pupae and coded for 34 taxa, representing three outgroups and 31 psephenid genera, including four undescribed ones. A strict consensus tree calculated (439 steps, consistency index ¼ 0.45, retention index ¼ 0.75) from the two most-parsimonious cladograms indicated that the monophyly of the family and subfamilies is supported, with the exception of Eubriinae, which is paraphyletic when including Afroeubria. Here a new subfamily, Afroeubriinae (subfam.n.), is formally estab- lished for Afroeubria. The analysis also indicated that the ‘streamlined’ larva is a derived adaptive radiation. Here, suprageneric taxonomy and the evolution of some significant characters are discussed. Keys are provided to the subfamilies and genera of Psephenidae considering larvae, adults and pupae. Introduction type specimens and the association of adults and immature stages by rearing, five new genera were proposed for Ori- Psephenidae, the ‘water penny’ beetles, are characterized by ental taxa and a well-resolved phylogenetic tree was ob- the peculiar larval body shape (Figs 4–7).
    [Show full text]
  • Banisteria, Number 20, 2002 © 2002 by the Virginia Natural History Society
    Banisteria, Number 20, 2002 © 2002 by the Virginia Natural History Society Thirteen Additions to the Known Beetle Fauna of Virginia (Coleoptera: Scirtidae, Bothrideridae, Cleridae, Tenebrionidae, Melyridae, Callirhipidae, Cerambycidae, Chrysomelidae) Richard L. Hoffman Virginia Museum of Natural History Martinsville, Virginia 24112 Steven M. Roble Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage 217 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Warren E. Steiner, Jr. Department of Systematic Biology - Entomology National Museum of Natural History, NHB-187 Smithsonian Institution Washington, D. C. 20560 INTRODUCTION SCIRTIDAE Ongoing inventories of the arthropod faunas of Ora troberti (Guérin) Virginia by our respective agencies continue to augment New northernmost and state records the lists of known resident species. Often these newly Members of this genus and the related Scirtes documented species are small and rarely collected, and resemble the chrysomelid “flea beetles” in having the hind their discovery in Virginia represents dramatic extensions femora greatly enlarged for jumping. Ora troberti is in their established areas of distribution, sometimes by listed for FL and TX (Peck & Thomas, 1998; Young, hundreds of miles. 2002a) and AL (Löding, 1945). There is a specimen We take this occasion to formally register thirteen labeled “La.” in the Casey Collection (USNM). White beetle species, most of which fall into the category just (1983) apparently used a specimen of O. troberti for his described, as native to Virginia. Eight of these species are field guide illustration of the genus. Its occurrence along resident in the southeastern Coastal Plain of the state and the Atlantic coast northward from Florida is not reported, three inhabit the Appalachians.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Coleoptera from Wisconsin
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 50 Numbers 1 & 2 -- Spring/Summer 2017 Article 2 Numbers 1 & 2 -- Spring/Summer 2017 September 2017 New Records of Coleoptera from Wisconsin Jordan D. Marché II [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Marché, Jordan D. II 2017. "New Records of Coleoptera from Wisconsin," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 50 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol50/iss1/2 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Marché: New Records of Coleoptera from Wisconsin 6 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 50, Nos. 1–2 New Records of Coleoptera from Wisconsin Jordan D. Marché II 5415 Lost Woods Court, Oregon, WI 53575 Abstract Specimens of eleven different species of beetles (one of which is identified only to genus) have been collected from and are herein reported as new to Wisconsin. These spe- cies collectively occur within seven different families: Leiodidae, Latridiidae, Scirtidae, Throscidae, Corylophidae, Staphylinidae, and Dermestidae. A majority of the specimens were collected at the author’s residence, either in pan traps or at UV lights; the others were taken at two nearby (township) parks. Although Wisconsin’s coleopteran four antennomeres. Antennal grooves may be fauna is large and diverse, new findings con- found beside the eyes (Peck 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Characters
    40 Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation: Final Report Leon C. Hinz Jr. and James N. Zahniser Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois 30 April 2015 INHS Technical Report 2015 (31) Prepared for: Illinois Department of Natural Resources State Wildlife Grant Program (Project Number T-88-R-001) Unrestricted: for immediate online release. Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Brian D. Anderson, Interim Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Geoffrey A. Levin, Acting Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation. Project Number: T-88-R-001 Contractor information: University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability Illinois Natural History Survey 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Project Period: 1 October 2013—31 September 2014 Principle Investigator: Leon C. Hinz Jr., Ph.D. Stream Ecologist Illinois Natural History Survey One Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL 62702-1271 217-785-8297 [email protected] Prepared by: Leon C. Hinz Jr. & James N. Zahniser Goals/ Objectives: (1) Review all SGNC listing criteria for currently listed non-mollusk invertebrate species using criteria in Illinois Wildlife Action Plan, (2) Assess current status of species populations, (3) Review criteria for additional species for potential listing as SGNC, (4) Assess stressors to species previously reviewed, (5) Complete draft updates and revisions of IWAP Appendix I and Appendix II for non-mollusk invertebrates. T-88 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • T TA /Î-T Dissertation Ij L Y L I Information Service
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advstnced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec­ tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu­ ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or in black and white paper format. * 4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro­ fiche but lack clarify on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, all photographs are available in black and white standard 35mm slide format.* *For more information about black and white slides or enlarged paper reproductions, please contact the Dissertations Customer Services Department. T TA /Î-T Dissertation i J l Y l i Information Service University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeoenvironmental Investigations Barry Taylor and Enid Allison
    CHAPTER 19 Palaeoenvironmental Investigations Barry Taylor and Enid Allison Introduction Palaeoenvironmental studies have been an integral part of research at Star Carr since Clark’s first excavations at the site (Walker and Godwin 1954). Since then, a series of increasingly detailed studies have been undertaken, which have created an incredibly precise record of the local environment throughout the time the site was occupied (Cloutman and Smith 1988; Dark 1998a). Rather than replicate this work, the current project has sought to establish in more detail the environmental conditions associated with assemblages of archaeological material in order to provide a better record of the original depositional context. By bringing this together with the results of previous work at the site, it is possible to describe in more detail the environmental context in which the inhabitation of the site took place. Previous work The first palaeoenvironmental investigations at Star Carr were carried out between 1949 and 1951 by Harry Godwin and Donald Walker, and were undertaken as part of Grahame Clark’s excavations at the site (Walker and Godwin 1954). Their work focused primarily on the analysis of the peat stratigraphy recorded in the trenches, and plant macrofossils from the archaeological horizons, which they used to establish the character of the environment contemporary with human activity. The results were brought together withpollen analysis from samples taken from Clark’s cutting II, and data from a series of cores taken through the sediments beyond the extent of the excavations to create the first environmental history of the site. By the mid-1980s developments in palaeoecological methods, and the greater availability of radiocarbon dating, allowed a more detailed study of the lake edge environments to be carried out, this time by Ed Clout- man under the auspices of the Vale of Pickering Research Trust (Cloutman and Smith 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups
    Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Final Report Prepared by: Christopher S. Hobson For: The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias Date: 15 April 2010 This report may be cited as follows: Hobson, C.S. 2010. Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups. Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. Unpublished report submitted to The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias. April 2010. 30 pages plus appendices. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12 April 2010 Contents List of Tables......................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures........................................................................................................................ iii Introduction............................................................................................................................ 1 Geology.................................................................................................................................. 2 Explanation of the Natural Heritage Ranking System..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure and Dynamics of a Water Beetle Community in a Semipermanent Wetland (Vrbenské Rybníky Nature Reserve, South Bohemia)
    Department of Ecosystem Biology Faculty of Science The University of South Bohemia České Bud ějovice The structure and dynamics of a water beetle community in a semipermanent wetland (Vrbenské rybníky Nature Reserve, South Bohemia) Bachelor Thesis Jan Kle čka Supervisor: Ing. MgA. David Boukal, Ph.D. České Bud ějovice 2008 1 Bachelor Thesis Kle čka, J., 2008: The structure and dynamics of a water beetle community in a semipermanent wetland (Vrbenské rybníky Nature Reserve, South Bohemia). BSc. Thesis, in English – 63 pp., Faculty of Science, The University of South Bohemia, České Bud ějovice, Czech Republic. Annotation In my thesis I examined the structure and dynamics of a water beetle community in a semipermanent wetland in an alder carr. The results are based on three years of my field work and processing of material collected by a light trap at the study site during five years. The thesis focuses on: 1. Comparison of selectivity and efficiency of several widely used sampling methods; 2. Seasonal dynamics and effects of environmental variables on flight acitivity; 3. Spatiotemporal dynamics and effects of habitat structure and fluctuations in water levels. General patterns and relationships are highlighted. Prohlašuji, že svoji bakalá řskou práci jsem vypracoval samostatn ě pouze s použitím pramen ů a literatury uvedených v seznamu citované literatury. Prohlašuji, že v souladu s § 47b zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. v platném zn ění souhlasím se zve řejn ěním své bakalá řské práce, a to v nezkrácené podob ě elektronickou cestou ve ve řejn ě přístupné části databáze STAG provozované Jiho českou univerzitou v Českých Bud ějovicích na jejích internetových stránkách.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Headwaters: the SCIENTIFIC BASIS for SAFEGUARDING STREAM and RIVER ECOSYSTEMS
    Protecting Headwaters: THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR SAFEGUARDING STREAM AND RIVER ECOSYSTEMS A Research Synthesis from the Stroud™ Water Research Center Small headwater streams like this one are the lifeblood of our streams and rivers. Protecting these headwaters is essential to preserving a healthy freshwater ecosystem and protecting our freshwater resources. About THE STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER The Stroud Water Research Center seeks to advance knowledge and stewardship of fresh water through research, education and global outreach and to help businesses, landowners, policy makers and individuals make informed decisions that affect water quality and availability around the world. The Stroud Water Research Center is an independent, 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. For more information go to www.stroudcenter.org. Sierra Club provided partial support for writing this white paper. Editing and executive summary by Matt Freeman. Contributors STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER SCIENTISTS AUTHORED PROTECTING HEADWATERS Louis A. Kaplan Senior Research Scientist Thomas L. Bott Vice President Senior Research Scientist John K. Jackson Senior Research Scientist J. Denis Newbold Research Scientist Bernard W. Sweeney Director President Senior Research Scientist For a downloadable, printer-ready copy of this document go to: http://www.stroudcenter.org/research/PDF/ProtectingHeadwaters.pdf. For a downloadable, printer-ready copy of the Executive Summary only, go to: http://www.stroudcenter.org/research/PDF/ProtectingHeadwaters_ExecSummary.pdf. 1 STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER | PROTECTING HEADWATERS Small headwater streams like this one are the lifeblood of our streams and rivers. Protecting these headwaters is essential to preserving a healthy freshwater ecosystem and protecting our freshwater resources. Executive Summary HEALTHY HEADWATERS ARE ESSENTIAL TO PRESERVE OUR FRESHWATER RESOURCES Scientific evidence clearly shows that healthy headwaters — tributary streams, intermittent streams, and spring seeps — are essential to the health of stream and river ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of the Reticulate Beetles of the Subfamily Cupedinae (Coleoptera: Archostemata), with a Review of the Historical Development A.G
    Invertebrate Zoology, 2016, 13(2): 61–190 © INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY, 2016 Taxonomy of the reticulate beetles of the subfamily Cupedinae (Coleoptera: Archostemata), with a review of the historical development A.G. Kirejtshuk1,2, A. Nel2, P.A. Kirejtshuk3 1 Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya emb. 1, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB - UMR 7205 – CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, Entomologie, F-75005, Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] 3 6th Linia, 49-34, St. Petersburg, 199004, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT:The paper is mainly devoted to the studies of the fossil Cupedidae from the Paleocene of Menat (Puy-de-Dôme, France) and to a preliminary generic analysis of the subfamily Cupedinae. All modern and fossil taxa of genus rank which could belong to Cupedinae are revised. The previous division of this subfamily into tribes (including Priacmini and Mesocupidini) is regarded as not advisable. An annotated list of the fossil species of the subfamily Cupedinae is compiled and revised. New keys to subfamilies of Cupedidae and to genera and subgenera of Cupedinae, and also keys for species of Cainomerga subgen.n. and Cupes found in deposits from Menat are given. As a result, several new genera and subgenera are proposed, i.e. the fossil Apriacma gen.n., from the early Cretaceous (the type species: Priacma tuberculosa Tan, Ren et Shin, 2006), Cre- tomerga gen.n., from the early Cretaceous (the type species: Priacmopsis subtilis Tan et Ren, 2006), Cupopsis gen.n.
    [Show full text]