DOCSLIB.ORG

The Struggle for Power in Yemen 1918 - 1962 ( the Mandate of the Covenant Is a Model ) Pjaee, 17(6) (2020)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Struggle for Power in Yemen 1918 - 1962 ( the Mandate of the Covenant Is a Model ) Pjaee, 17(6) (2020) THE STRUGGLE FOR POWER IN YEMEN 1918 - 1962 ( THE MANDATE OF THE COVENANT IS A MODEL ) PJAEE, 17(6) (2020) THE STRUGGLE FOR POWER IN YEMEN 1918-1962 (THE MANDATE OF THE COVENANT IS A MODEL) Prof. Dr. Karim Talal Mesir College of Basic Education, Al-Mustansiriyah University, Iraq. Prof. Dr. Karim Talal Mesir , The Struggle For Power In Yemen 1918-196 (The Mandate Of The Covenant Is A Model) , Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 17(6). ISSN 1567-214x. ABSTRACT: In Yemen,Al-Zaidiyyah stipulates of imam will be a scholar, ascetic, courageous, generous. However, it made deviating from the imam a legitimate matter if it is proven that he is unfair and violates the Sharia.Or that a more qualified person demanded the position.Al-Zaidiyyahalso permitted the existence of two legitimate imams at the same time, if their respective spheres of influence are far enough apart. This opened the door to continuous wars between those claiming the Imamate and the Crown Prince, with the sanctification of these wars on the basis that they are essential to defend the faith, and based on that Sharia rule. The system followed by the Yemenis, until the reign of Imam Yahya bin Hamid al-Din (1904-1948). That the people of the solution and the contract meet at the death of the imam to choose a new imam. Those who meet the conditions of the Imamate. Whether he was the son of the deceased imam or someone else. However, the work of that system was abolished after Yemen became a powerful and powerful country.Imam Yahya sought to appoint his eldest son, Prince Ahmed, as heir fearing that the death of the Imam brings about, without having a known crown prince, of unpredictable troubles and afflictions. The problem of competition for the crown prince, one of the most important problems that faced the Zaydi Imamate regime in the modern history of Yemen, it must be noted that the competition for the crown prince in Yemen appears in its clear form, except during the reign of Imam Ahmad (1948-1962). Although the conflict is over the imamate itself. It was the hallmark of the imamate regime in Yemen. Therefore, a distinction must be made between the struggle over the imamate itself and the competition over the succession of the imamate or succession to the crown. 15997 THE STRUGGLE FOR POWER IN YEMEN 1918 - 1962 ( THE MANDATE OF THE COVENANT IS A MODEL ) PJAEE, 17(6) (2020) The First Topic: The competition for power in Yemen 1918-1962 The problem of competition and struggle for power in Yemen is considered, especially over the mandate of the Covenant, one of the most basic and main problems that faced the Zaidiyyah imamate regime in the contemporary history of Yemen, as this problem casts a shadow over the political reality in the country, which was mainly suffering from political, economic and social problems, because of the policy pursued by the system, which was headed by Imam Yahya bin Hamid al-Din (1904-1948), represented by the system of isolation. He rejected everything new or any call for reform.The exacerbation of this problem has led to continuous conflicts and disputes between members of the royal family. It had negative repercussions on the internal situation on the one hand, and Yemen’s foreign policy towards Arab countries and foreign countries on the other hand, and on the efforts made by Yemen to resist British colonialism in the south from a third party (Al-Imirah 2007, p. 39). The problem of the struggle for power began in Yemen, and especially about the mandate of the Covenant since 1923. When raised a group of scholars who applied to Imam Yahya, by assigning the mandate of the Covenant to Prince Ahmed, the oldest of his fourteen sons. Although he had reservations about announcing that officially, for violating the conditions of the Zaidiyyah school (Al-Sayyad, 1962, p 121)(Al-Zaidiyyah sect differs from the rest of the other Shiite sects in that it refuses to appoint the Imam to whoever succeeds him while he is in his life, and believes that the Imam must be elected by Muslims in the people of the solution and the contract. Ahmed Saleh Al-Sayyad, the authority and the opposition in contemporary Yemen). However, Prince Ahmed became known as the Crown Prince since the twenty-fourth of August 1924, that was, according to some of the Zaydi scholars, a clear violation. When it was recognized that there is no crown prince to rule and the system of government was amended to a hereditary monarchy (Al-Azazi, 1962 p. 40). Based on that legal rule in choosing an imam, the system followed by the Yemenis until the era of Imam Yahya bin Hamid al-Din 1904-1948. That the people of the solution and the contract meet on the death of the imam to choose a new imam who meets the conditions of the imam. Whether he was the son of the deceased imam or someone else. However, working with that system was abolished after Yemen became a powerful and powerful country.Imam Yahya sought to appoint his eldest son, Prince Ahmed, as heir to the throne. When the death of the imam gives birth to him without having a known crown prince, there are unpredictable problems and strife (Saeed, 1959. P. 311). This opinion came in harmony with what Imam Yahya bin Hamid al-Din was thinking of taking the pledge of allegiance to his eldest son.He was Saif Al-Islam, Prince Ahmed, Crown Prince, especially after the latter demonstrated his courage and political acumen in carrying out the tasks assigned to him (Hassan, 1947, p. 103). However, the foundations of the Al-Zaidiyyah Imamate, which did not allow the appointment of the Crown Prince, as we mentioned previously,spoke to him or pushed him to try to show the appointment issue as if it were the demand of the people of the solution and the contract. Moreover, these apparent reservations at first about the appointment of a crown prince was not final.If the Crown Prince proves his worth and deserving of this new position, provide an excuse for the imam, and for these, the committee for dissolution and contract is the legal cover for 15998 THE STRUGGLE FOR POWER IN YEMEN 1918 - 1962 ( THE MANDATE OF THE COVENANT IS A MODEL ) PJAEE, 17(6) (2020) creating the position of Crown Prince. That they adhere to the teachings of the Al-Zaidiyyah imamate. Which does not recognize the mandate of the Covenant, which is the loophole that accompanied the birth of the regime of the Crown Prince over the political system in Yemen, at the same time, the door was opened wide for those aspiring to be imamate, or the mandate of the crown from other sons of Imam Yahya and others to assume the position of the imamate even after the official appointment of the crown prince. It was the exit of Saif al-Islam Ibrahim bin Imam Yahya over the Imam’s ruling system. He joined the opposition in Aden publicly in 1946, and work to drop the symbols of the regime at the time. This marked the beginning of the struggle for power after the seventeenth of February 1948 (Al-Thor, 1968, p. 53). After Saif Al-Islam Ibrahim met his death with some of the opposition leaders Ridha, 1974, p. 35(). Some brothers of Crown Prince Ahmed, who supported the previous event, stood in the face of their older brother, these were Al-Qassem, Ismail, Al-Abbas and Yahya.In addition to his son Muhammad al-Badr, who followed Abdullah Ahmad al-Wazir as Imam of Yemen (D.K.O, 1948, p. 53). An Fonihlis (1955, . p35) referred to this, saying: “Force and brutality have been the means of Imam Ahmad since he ascended the throne in 1948,Imam Ahmad was freed in his life after becoming Imam of Yemen from five of his brothers by murder (They are: 1. Saif al-Haq Ibrahim, 2. Saif al-Islam, the purifier, and he assigned one of his followers to mix a slow poison in his food due to an accident that occurred in the special section of the harem in the imam’s palace, and when the condition worsened Saif al-Islam purified, so the imam decided to remove him from Yemen until he died Far away, and he was transported by plane to Egypt under the pretext that he wanted to be treated in one of its hospitals, and Saif al-Islam al-Mutahhar died the same day he arrived in Cairo. 3. Saif al-Islam Yahya, and the Imam hated him and kept lying in wait for him until he was poisoned by blood and Yahya asked his brother, Imam Hamad, to allow him to travel abroad for treatment, but the imam refused and did not allow him until after he was sure that his brother was in the last conflict, and he died in Asmara before he reaches the hospital. 4. Saif al-Islam Abdullah and al-Abbas, and the Imam ordered their slaughter by the sword for their participation in the coup of Ahmad al-Thalaya.). Imam Ahmad’s intentions have been since assuming the throne of Yemen, in the wake of the failure of the 1948 movement, which his father was assassinated. Intending to take the pledge of allegiance to the Crown Prince to his eldest son, Muhammad Al-Badr. However, his brothers’ public opposition to these intentions,pushed him to wait for a period of time (Saeed, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Culmination of Tradition-Based Tafsīr the Qurʼān Exegesis Al-Durr Al-Manthūr of Al-Suyūṭī (D. 911/1505)
    The Culmination of Tradition-based Tafsīr The Qurʼān Exegesis al-Durr al-manthūr of al-Suyūṭī (d. 911/1505) by Shabir Ally A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto © Copyright by Shabir Ally 2012 The Culmination of Tradition-based Tafsīr The Qurʼān Exegesis al-Durr al-manthūr of al-Suyūṭī (d. 911/1505) Shabir Ally Doctor of Philosophy Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto 2012 Abstract This is a study of Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī’s al-Durr al-manthūr fi-l-tafsīr bi-l- ma’thur (The scattered pearls of tradition-based exegesis), hereinafter al-Durr. In the present study, the distinctiveness of al-Durr becomes evident in comparison with the tafsīrs of al- a arī (d. 310/923) and I n Kathīr (d. 774/1373). Al-Suyūṭī surpassed these exegetes by relying entirely on ḥadīth (tradition). Al-Suyūṭī rarely offers a comment of his own. Thus, in terms of its formal features, al-Durr is the culmination of tradition- based exegesis (tafsīr bi-l-ma’thūr). This study also shows that al-Suyūṭī intended in al-Durr to subtly challenge the tradition- ased hermeneutics of I n Taymīyah (d. 728/1328). According to Ibn Taymīyah, the true, unified, interpretation of the Qurʼān must be sought in the Qurʼān ii itself, in the traditions of Muḥammad, and in the exegeses of the earliest Muslims. Moreover, I n Taymīyah strongly denounced opinion-based exegesis (tafsīr bi-l-ra’y).
    [Show full text]
  • Parker T. Hart Interviewer: Dennis J
    Parker T. Hart Oral History Interview – JFK#3, 06/10/1970 Administrative Information Creator: Parker T. Hart Interviewer: Dennis J. O’Brien Date of Interview: June 10, 1970 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 15 pages Biographical Note Hart was a member of the U.S. Foreign Service, 1938–1949; the U.S. Consul General in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, 1949–1951; Director of the Office of Near East Affairs, 1952– 1955; Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, 1955–1958; the U.S. Consul General in Damascus, Syria, 1958; Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs, 1958–1960; the U.S. Ambassador to North Yemen (1961–1962), Kuwait (1962–1963), Saudi Arabia (1961–1965), and Turkey (1965–1968); and the Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs, 1968– 1969. In this interview Hart discusses Ellsworth Bunker’s mission in Saudi Arabia; meetings between Bunker and Prime Minister Faisal; Faisal’s distrust of Gamal Abdel Nasser and Egyptian inaction in regards to the agreement reached with Bunker; difficulties with the U.S. Department of Defense over the agreement to train Saudi pilots and use American military equipment; major problems in the Middle East, 1957–1967; communications between John F. Kennedy [JFK] and Faisal; and Saudi reactions to JFK’s death and to Lyndon B. Johnson becoming President, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed October 14, 1980, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Power and Cross-Border Mobility in the Middle East
    IPS0010.1177/0192512118759902International Political Science ReviewTsourapas 759902research-article2018 Article International Political Science Review 2018, Vol. 39(3) 400 –416 Authoritarian emigration states: © The Author(s) 2018 Reprints and permissions: Soft power and cross-border sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118759902DOI: 10.1177/0192512118759902 mobility in the Middle East journals.sagepub.com/home/ips Gerasimos Tsourapas University of Birmingham, UK Abstract Can labor emigration form part of a state’s foreign policy goals? The relevant literature links emigration to states’ developmental needs, which does not explain why some states choose to economically subsidize their citizens’ emigration. This article explores for the first time the soft power importance of high-skilled emigration from authoritarian emigration states. It finds that the Egyptian state under Gamal Abdel Nasser employed labor emigration for two distinct purposes linked to broader soft power interests: first, as an instrument of cultural diplomacy to spread revolutionary ideals of Arab unity and anti-imperialism across the Middle East; second, as a tool for disseminating development aid, particularly in Yemen and sub-Saharan Africa. Drawing on Arabic and non-Arabic primary sources, the article identifies the interplay between foreign policy and cross-border mobility, while also sketching an evolving research agenda on authoritarian emigration states’ policy-making. Keywords Soft power, diasporas, Egypt, Middle East, authoritarianism, migration, case study, Arab–Israeli conflict Introduction Can labor emigration serve a state’s foreign policy goals? In particular, how do authoritarian states use labor emigration in their foreign policy-making? The emerging academic literature on the poli- tics of international migration has yet to fully explore this phenomenon as a separate field of inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastward Drift of Arabs and Iranians
    Schwanitz Report Review Article 30 September 2015, 1-9 Updated Webversion 9-2015 Eastward Drift of Arabs and Iranians Ferris on Soviet Arabs, American Arabs, and Islamists in the Cold War It should have taken five weeks, but it lasted five years. Yet, Abd an-Nasir's intervention in Arabia's North Yemen—the South of which was in British hands, and securing access to the Sues Canal played a major role in all considerations—didn't come out of the blue. In his first book, Jesse Ferris wants to show how Egyptian troops in Yemen became a part of president Abd an-Nasir's defeat by Israel in the war of June 1967. He uncovers how the interven- tion accelerated the demise of Nasirism. Most recently, all of this became popular in Cairo again. A civilian-military axis deposed the "Muslim Brotherhood's president," Muhammad Mursi, in the 2013 "coupvolt," a merger of coup d'état and revolt. The new "1/3 Sues Canal" was finished a year later. And the Egyptians debated sending troops to Yemen to help the Sunni Saudi coalition, and Cairo guards with its navy ships the Bab al-Mandab to stop Shia Iranian deliveries of weapons in the battles against the al-Huthis. Suez Canal Authority Press Ismailia In this light the author, who works at the Israel Democracy Institute of Jerusalem, wrote a highly topical book. I will name the chapters, discuss the key thesis and add notes, also on basic German insights which may lead to a more global view on the research and methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Eksistensi Khawarij Menurut Pemikiran Fazlur Rahman
    EKSISTENSI KHAWARIJ MENURUT PEMIKIRAN FAZLUR RAHMAN SKRIPSI Diajukan Untuk Melengkapi Tugas-tugas dan Memenuhi Syarat-syarat Guna Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Agama Islam (S.Ag). Dalam Ilmu Ushuluddin Oleh: IDWIN SAPUTRA NPM: 1531010041 Prodi: Aqidah Filsafat Islam FAKULTAS USHULUDDIN DAN STUDI AGAMA UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI RADEN INTAN LAMPUNG 1440 H / 2019 M ABSTRAK EKSISTENSI KHAWARIJ MENURUT PEMIKIRAN FAZLUR RAHMAN Oleh: Idwin Saputra Khawarij adalah sekelompok orang yang keluar dari barisan Ali Ibn Abi Thalib, di karenakan mereka tidak menerima atas tahkim (arbitrse) yang diterima oleh Khalifah Ali Ibn Abi Thalib dengan Mu’awiyah dalam perkara Khilafah (pemimpin). Dan orang-orang Khawarij ini dicirikan dengan watak yang keras, karena asal usul mereka dari masyarakat badawi dan gurun pasir yang tandus. dan menurut mereka orang yang tidak sepaham dengan mereka dianggap Kafir, baik itu pelaku dosa besar maupun kecil. Karena menurut mereka yang paling benar adalah apa yang sudah ditentukan oleh Allah dan apa yang di dalam Al-qur’an sesuai dengan apa yang menjadi semboyan mereka yakni : La HukmaIlaAllah“ tidak ada hukum kecuali hukum Allah,”. Khawarij ini sebenarnya sudah hilang sesuai dengan sejarah, hanya golongan Al- Ibadiyah yang masih ada sampai saat ini terletak di bagian Zanzibar, Afrika Utara, Omman dan Arabiah Selatan. Kemudian Khawarij ini juga ada yang ekstrem dan yang moderat. Menurut Fazlur Rahman nama Khawarij tak berimplikasi bid’ah dari segi doktrin, melainkan sebatas pemberontak atau pelaku revolusi. Adapun rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah: Bagaimana eksistensi khawarij saat ini. Bagaimana Khawarij menurut pemikiran Fazlur Rahman. Adapun tujuan penelitan ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimaman eksistensi Khawarij saat ini dan bagaimana Khawarij Menurut pemikiran Fazlur Rahman.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Lo Ndo N Soas the Umayyad Caliphate 65-86
    UNIVERSITY OF LONDON SOAS THE UMAYYAD CALIPHATE 65-86/684-705 (A POLITICAL STUDY) by f Abd Al-Ameer 1 Abd Dixon Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philoso] August 1969 ProQuest Number: 10731674 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10731674 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 2. ABSTRACT This thesis is a political study of the Umayyad Caliphate during the reign of f Abd a I -M a lik ibn Marwan, 6 5 -8 6 /6 8 4 -7 0 5 . The first chapter deals with the po litical, social and religious background of ‘ Abd al-M alik, and relates this to his later policy on becoming caliph. Chapter II is devoted to the ‘ Alid opposition of the period, i.e . the revolt of al-Mukhtar ibn Abi ‘ Ubaid al-Thaqafi, and its nature, causes and consequences. The ‘ Asabiyya(tribal feuds), a dominant phenomenon of the Umayyad period, is examined in the third chapter. An attempt is made to throw light on its causes, and on the policies adopted by ‘ Abd al-M alik to contain it.
    [Show full text]
  • SYRIA the Constitution and Other Laws And
    SYRIA The constitution and other laws and policies protect religious freedom; however, the government imposed restrictions on this right. While there is no official state religion, the constitution requires that the president be Muslim and stipulates that Islamic jurisprudence is a principal source of legislation. The constitution provides for freedom of faith and religious practice so long as religious rites do not disturb the public order; however, the government restricted full freedom of practice on some religious matters, including proselytizing. Although the government generally enforced legal and policy protections of religious freedom for most Syrians, including the Christian minority, it continued to prosecute individuals for membership in the Muslim Brotherhood, Salafist groups, and other faith communities that it deemed to be extreme. The Syrian government outlaws not only Muslim extremist groups, but also Jehovah's Witnesses. In addition the government continued to monitor the activities of all organizations, including religious groups, and to discourage proselytizing, which it deemed a threat to relations among and within different faiths. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the government during the reporting period. There were reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. There were occasional reports of tensions among religious groups, some of which were attributable to economic rivalries but exacerbated by religious differences. Muslim converts to Christianity were sometimes forced to leave their place of residence due to societal pressure. The U.S. government discusses religious freedom with civil society, religious leaders, and adherents of religious groups as part of its overall policy to promote human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Radicalization of Faith Concept in the School of Islam: Study of Khawarij and Muktazilah
    Asian Social Science; Vol. 14, No. 7; 2018 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Radicalization of Faith Concept in the School of Islam: Study of Khawarij and Muktazilah Ramli Nur1 1 Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia Correspondence: Ramli Nur, Jl. Willem Iskandar Pasar V Medan Estate, North Sumatera, Indonesia. E-mail: [email protected] Received: April 29, 2018 Accepted: June 2, 2018 Online Published: June 22, 2018 doi:10.5539/ass.v14n7p77 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n7p77 Abstract The Radicalism is an idea or school that pursues revolution or social and political reforms in a tough or drastic way. The school of khawarij and muktazilah (two groups) have marked the history of Islamic thought about the concept of faith. The coloration shown tends to represent extremes in understanding the concept of faith. In general, it makes charitable deeds or branch teachings (furu') as part of the nature of faith. That leads to them getting caught in judging faith based on it being black or white between mukmin and kafir. Therefore the perpetrators of the great sins are punished out of Islam. Not merely categorization, but they also fighting and justifying of Muslims whom they consider to have abandoned the teachings of birth or violated something prohibited on the teaching of birth. Such as of these understandings have mutated in the long history of the Muslims into the various nisbat mentions and often manipulate the religious as legitimacy for destructive radical actions. That is why this idea is quite dangerous not only at the beginning of its appearance but also in the current era to watch out for.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran and Yemen; Study the Reflection of the Islamic Revolution of Iran on Yemen and Its Results
    Iran and Yemen; Study the Reflection of the Islamic Revolution of Iran on Yemen and Its Results Amir Reza Emami¹, Fatemeh Zare² ¹,2 Graduate of Political Science (International Relations), Department of Law and Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Yazd, Yazd University, Iran. Abstract The Islamic Revolution of Iran took place in 1789 and was the first successful revolution inspired by Islam. Undoubtedly, this revolution had repercussions on the peripheral and semi-peripheral countries of Iran, and among the semi-peripheral countries of Iran, which was affected by the Iranian revolution, was Yemen. In the following years, with the beginning of the Arab Spring (Islamic Awakening), this country underwent changes and protest movements were formed in it, the content of which was very close to the foundations of the Islamic Revolution of Iran in 1789. These protests and anti-government movements in Yemen at the time led to the revolution and ultimately to the victory of the Yemeni Houthis and the Ansarullah movement. But what could be the consequences of this event in Yemen? Do these results include the system of the Islamic Republic of Iran? In fact, the main question of this research is what are the results of the reflection of the Islamic Revolution of Iran on Yemen. Therefore, this study seeks to first examine the reflection of the Islamic Revolution in Yemen and then explain its results. The method of the present research is qualitative and based on descriptive-analytical and the method of collecting data and information is based on documentary studies, libraries and reputable research and extension science journals and various statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prospects of Political Islam in a Troubled Region Islamists and Post-Arab Spring Challenges
    The Prospects of Political Islam in a Troubled Region Islamists and Post-Arab Spring Challenges Editor Dr. Mohammed Abu Rumman The Prospects of Political Islam in a Troubled Region Islamists and Post-Arab Spring Challenges Editor Dr. Mohammed Abu Rumman 1 The Hashemite Kingdom Of Jordan The Deposit Number at The National Library (2018/2/529) 277 AbuRumman, Mohammad Suliman The Prospects Of Political Islam In A Troubled Region / Moham- mad Suliman Abu Rumman; Translated by William Joseph Ward. – Am- man: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2018 (178) p. Deposit No.: 2018/2/529 Descriptors: /Politics//Islam/ يتحمل المؤلف كامل المسؤولية القانونية عن محتوى مصنفه وﻻ ّيعبر هذا المصنف عن رأي دائرة المكتبة الوطنية أو أي جهة حكومية أخرى. Published in 2018 by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Jordan & Iraq FES Jordan & Iraq P.O. Box 941876 Amman 11194 Jordan Email: [email protected] Website:www.fes-jordan.org Not for sale © FES Jordan & Iraq All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publishers. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are solely those of the original author. They do not necessarily represent those of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung or the editor. Translation: William Joseph Ward Cover and Lay-out: Mua’th Al Saied Printing: Economic Press ISBN: 978-9957-484-80-4 2 The Prospects of Political Islam in a Troubled Region Islamists and Post-Arab Spring Challenges Contributed Authors Dr. Mohammed Abu Rumman Dr. Khalil Anani Dr. Neven Bondokji Hassan Abu Hanieh Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Together - Volume 6 Yemen: the Happy Land M.M.Ninan
    FLYING TOGETHER - VOLUME 6 YEMEN: THE HAPPY LAND M.M.NINAN San Jose, CA, 94123 2015 FLYING TOGETHER - VOLUME 6 YEMEN: THE HAPPY LAND M.M.NINAN CONTENTS I HISTORY OF YEMEN 1 II THOMAS CHRISTIANITY IN YEMEN AND NAJRAN MASSACRE 12 III THE LAND OF YEMEN 22 IV RELIGION IN YEMEN 35 V KHAT CHEWING IN YEMEN 41 VI THE UNIVERSITY OF SANA’A 45 VII INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF YEMEN AND THE MALAYALEE HOUSE FELLOWSHIP 51 VIII MOTHER TERESA OF CALCUTTA 55 IX JIBLA HOSPITAL 58 X SANA'A ART FESTIVAL 60 XI INDIAN/MALAYALEE ASSOCIATION 62 Xii AT HOME 66 XIII KODAIKANAL INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL 75 XIV BANGALORE 81 XV THE FINAL CONFLICT 90 Bab al Yemen - The Door of Yemen FLYING TOGETHER - YEMEN: THE HAPPY LAND M.M.NINAN I HISTORY OF YEMEN This was the Arabia Felix ("happy land") of the classical geographers, a region, its inhabitants boasted, "the very dust of which was gold, and whose men were the healthiest, and whose women gave birth without pain." 1 FLYING TOGETHER - YEMEN: THE HAPPY LAND M.M.NINAN Yemen Origins Yemenies were not really Arabs in the sense that they are descendants of Ismael. They are Semites but not the children of Abraham. They descent from Jokthan another son of Shem.Sheba (Saba) was descended from Joktan (Qahtan). Adnan descended from Ismail (one of the twelve sons of Ismail, the son of Abraham) became the father of all the Arabs, . Adnan sired Maad, who had a son called Nizar, both of whose names have been found in the archaeological record as large tribes of central Arabia.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Nationalism in Interwar Period Iraq: a Descriptive Analysis of Sami Shawkat’S Al-Futuwwah Youth Movement Saman Nasser
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Fall 2018 Arab nationalism in interwar period Iraq: A descriptive analysis of Sami Shawkat’s al-Futuwwah youth movement Saman Nasser Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the Intellectual History Commons, Islamic World and Near East History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Nasser, Saman, "Arab nationalism in interwar period Iraq: A descriptive analysis of Sami Shawkat’s al-Futuwwah youth movement" (2018). Masters Theses. 587. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/587 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Arab Nationalism in Interwar Period Iraq: A Descriptive Analysis of Sami Shawkat’s al- Futuwwah Youth Movement Saman Nasser A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the degree of Master of Arts Department of History December 2018 FACULTY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair: Dr. Shah Mahmoud Hanifi Committee Members/Readers: Dr. Timothy J. Fitzgerald Dr. Steven W. Guerrier Dedication To my beloved parents: Rafid Nasser and Samhar Abed. You are my Watan. ii Acknowledgements My sincere personal and intellectual gratitude goes to my thesis director, Professor Shah Mahmoud Hanifi. Professor Hanifi’s ‘bird-eye’ instructions, care, encouragement, patience and timely football analogies (to clarify critical points) made the production of the thesis possible.
    [Show full text]