DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Open Societies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Open Societies Building Open Societies SOROS FOUNDATIONS NETWORK | 2002 REPORT Building Open Societies SOROS FOUNDATIONS NETWORK 2002 REPORT OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE 400 West 59th Street, New York, NY 10019 USA www.soros.org Building Open Societies: Soros Foundations Network 2002 Report © 2003 by the Open Society Institute 400 West 59th Street, New York, NY 10019 USA All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form. Contents Introduction 6 Expanding the Open Society Network President’s Message 12 Global Expansion, Advocacy, and a New Movement Regions 18 CENTRAL EURASIA 21 Central Eurasia Project 22 Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation–Armenia 23 Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation–Azerbaijan 25 Open Society Georgia Foundation 26 Soros Foundation–Kazakhstan 27 Soros Foundation–Kyrgyzstan 28 Mongolian Foundation for Open Society 29 Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation–Tajikistan 30 Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation–Turkey 31 Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation–Uzbekistan 34 SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE 37 Open Society Foundation for Albania 38 Open Society Fund–Bosnia and Herzegovina 39 Open Society Institute–Croatia 40 Kosova Foundation for Open Society 41 Foundation Open Society Institute–Macedonia 42 Serbia: photographed by George Georgiou 44 Soros Foundation–Moldova 45 Foundation Open Society Institute–Representative Office Montenegro 47 Fund for an Open Society–Serbia 48 CENTRAL EUROPE: EU ACCESSION COUNTRIES 51 EU Accession Monitoring Program 52 Open Society Foundation–Sofia (Bulgaria) 53 Open Society Fund–Prague (Czech Republic) 54 Open Estonia Foundation 55 Soros Foundation–Hungary 58 Soros Foundation–Latvia 59 Open Society Fund–Lithuania 60 Stefan Batory Foundation (Poland) 61 Open Society Foundation–Romania 62 Open Society Foundation–Bratislava (Slovakia) CONTENTS 3 64 RUSSIA AND UKRAINE 67 Open Society Institute–Russia 68 International Renaissance Foundation (Ukraine) 69 International Soros Science Education Program 70 Russia: photographed by Thomas Dworzak 74 SOUTHEAST ASIA 77 Burma Project/Southeast Asia Initiative 79 Burmese Refugees: photographed by Dean Chapman 80 AFRICA 83 Open Society Foundation for South Africa 84 Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa 85 Open Society Initiative for West Africa 86 Africa: photographed by Ami Vitale 90 THE AMERICAS 93 Fundacion Soros–Guatemala 94 Fondation Connaissance et Liberté (Haiti) 96 2002 Foundation Expenditures Initiatives 98 LAW, CRIMINAL JUSTICE, AND HUMAN RIGHTS 101 Open Society Justice Initiative 102 Democracy Coalition Project 103 Network Women’s Program 104 Roma Programs 107 AIDS and Stigma: photographed by Eric Gottesman 108 PUBLIC HEALTH 111 Network Public Health Programs 114 Drugs and Harm Reduction: photographed by John Ranard 118 EDUCATION 121 Network Children and Youth Programs 123 Education Support Program SOROS 124 English Language Programs FOUNDA 124 International Higher Education Support Program 125 Network Scholarship Programs TIONS 126 2002 Central European University NETWORK REPORT 4 128 INFORMATION AND MEDIA 131 Information Program 132 Network Media Program 132 Project Syndicate 133 Open Society Archives 134 Bosnia Campaign Posters: photographed by Leslie Fratkin 136 Central European University Press 139 Arts and Culture Network Program 140 East East Program: Partnership Beyond Borders 141 Economic and Business Development Program 141 International Policy Fellowships 142 Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative 144 2002 Program Expenditures U.S. Programs 146 A Year of Change 149 Justice 153 Fellowships 155 OSI–Baltimore 156 Day Labor: photographed by Jon Lowenstein 158 Youth Initiatives 160 Medicine as a Profession 162 Project on Death in America 163 Program on Reproductive Health and Rights 164 Governance and Public Policy 164 Concluded Programs 165 OSI–Washington, D.C. 166 2002 U.S. Programs Expenditures OSI Offices 170 Open Society Institute 170 Open Society Institute–Brussels 171 Open Society Institute–Budapest 172 Open Society Institute–Paris 173 Open Society Institute–Washington, D.C. Application Information 174 Directory 176 CONTENTS 5 INTRODUCTION the Expanding Open Society Network SOROS FOUNDATIONS NETWORK 2002 REPORT 6 INTRODUCTION 7 The Open Society Institute (OSI) and the Soros About Our Donor Partnerships foundations network implement a range of initia- As OSI and the Soros foundations network evolve and tives to promote open society by shaping govern- expand globally, partnerships with other donors are ment policy and supporting education, media, becoming ever more significant in making possible the public health, and human and women’s rights, work described in our annual reports. In some instances, as well as social, legal, and economic reform. these partnerships involve explicit agreements with other donors to share costs. At other times, they take place The goal is to transform closed societies into open informally when another donor determines to support a ones and to protect and expand the values of project we initiated or, conversely, when we build upon existing open societies. another donor’s initiative. In a relatively small number Open societies are characterized by the rule of of cases, other donors contribute directly to one of the law; respect for human rights, minorities, and Soros foundations in support of a particular project. minority opinions; democratically elected govern- Our donor partners include: ments; market economies in which business and ½ Intergovernmental bodies such as the World Bank, the government are separate; and thriving civil societies. World Health Organization (WHO), UNAIDS, UNICEF, OSI was created in 1993 by investor and philan- the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe thropist George Soros to support his foundations in (OSCE), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the Council of Europe, and the European Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Commission; Union. Soros established these foundations, starting ½ National government aid agencies, including the in 1984, to help the countries in the region in their United States Agency for International Development transition to democracy. (USAID), Britain’s Department for International The activities of the Soros foundations network Development (DFID), the Swedish International have expanded to other areas of the world where the Development Agency (SIDA), the Canadian International transition to democracy is of particular concern. Development Agency (CIDA), the Dutch MATRA program, The network encompasses more than 50 countries the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, the with initiatives in Africa, Central Asia and the German Foreign Ministry, and a number of Austrian government agencies, including the ministries of educa- Caucasus, the Middle East, Latin America and the tion and foreign affairs, that operate bilaterally; Caribbean, and Southeast Asia, as well as in Haiti, ½ American private foundations Mongolia, and Turkey. OSI also supports programs such as Ford, MacArthur, Bill and Melinda Gates, Annie E. Casey, Charles Stewart in the United States and selected projects elsewhere Mott, American Austrian, and Atlantic, the Irene in the world. Diamond Fund, Carnegie Corporation, and the German To foster open society on a global level, OSI aims Marshall Fund; to bring together a larger Open Society Network of ½ European private foundations such as the Robert Bosch other nongovernmental organizations, international Foundation, the King Baudouin Foundation, the Rausing institutions, and government agencies. At the heart Trust, the European Cultural Foundation, and the German of this growing Open Society Network are the Soros political party-affiliated foundations; foundations, OSI, and the many organizations with ½ European and American institutions that administer which OSI has formed partnerships. assistance funds obtained from their governments such as the Swedish Helsinki Committee, Press Now (Dutch), 8 Vera Institute of Justice NOVIB (Dutch), the British Council, Norwegian People’s ½ for its innovative efforts to Aid, MedienHilfe (Swiss), Freedom House (American), pursue criminal justice reform programs in such coun- the International Research and Exchanges Board or IREX tries as Russia, South Africa, and the United States; (American), the National Endowment for Democracy ½ Global Witness for its investigations of the connections (American), the Eurasia Foundation (American), and the between resource exploitation, corruption, the arms trade, International Nazi Persecutee Relief Fund (American, and severe abuses of human rights; French, and British); ½ Center for Public Integrity for promoting transparency ½ And national governments in several countries that in government and for exposing corruption; cofund programs sponsored by our foundations in those ½ local chapters of Transparency International for their countries, especially in education. work with Soros foundations on anticorruption measures; We also want to acknowledge the Baltic-American ½ Médecins Sans Frontières, the AIDS Foundation East- Partnership Fund and the Trust for Civil Society in Central West, Doctors of the World, and Partners in Health for their and Eastern Europe. OSI is not only a donor to these efforts in addressing crucial public health emergencies initiatives, but also a partner of both. that are often connected to abuses of human rights; The Open Society Institute and the Soros foundations in different parts of the world are deeply grateful to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Businessmen V. Investigators: Who Is Responsible for the Poor Russian Investment Climate?
    BUSINESSMEN V. INVESTIGATORS: WHO IS ReSPONSIBLE FOR THE POOR RUSSIAN INVESTMENT CLIMATE? Dmitry Gololobov, University of Westminster (London, UK) This article aims to examine the extent to which Russian investigations into economic and financial crimes are influenced by such factors as systemic problems with Russian gatekeepers, the absence of a formal corporate whistle-blowing mechanism and the continuous abuse of the law by the Russian business community. The traditional critical approach to the quality and effectiveness of Russian economic and financial investigations does not produce positive results and needs to be reformulated by considering the opinions of entrepreneurs. The author considers that forcing Russian entrepreneurs, regardless of the size of their business, to comply with Russian laws and regulations may be a more efficient way to develop the business environment than attempting to gradually improve the Russian judicial system. It is also hardly possible to expect the Russian investigatory bodies to investigate what are effectively complex economic and financial crimes in the almost complete absence of a developed whistle-blowing culture. Such a culture has greatly contributed to the success of widely-publicised corporate and financial investigations in the United States and Europe. The poor development of the culture of Russian gatekeepers and the corresponding regulatory environment is one more significant factor that permanently undermines the effectiveness of economic investigations and damages the investment climate. Key words: Russia; investigation; economic crime; gatekeepers; whistleblowing. 1. Introduction The aim of this article is to analyse the ongoing conflict between Russian investigators and the Russian business community, and to make one more attempt at answering the long-standing question regarding how a satisfactory balance between the interests of effective investigation and the protection of the business community can be reached.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis
    Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 4 Spring 2005 Freedom or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr Recommended Citation Hannibal Travis, Freedom or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq, 3 Nw. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 1 (2005). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol3/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2005 Northwestern University School of Law Volume 3 (Spring 2005) Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights FREEDOM OR THEOCRACY?: CONSTITUTIONALISM IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ By Hannibal Travis* “Afghans are victims of the games superpowers once played: their war was once our war, and collectively we bear responsibility.”1 “In the approved version of the [Afghan] constitution, Article 3 was amended to read, ‘In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam.’ … This very significant clause basically gives the official and nonofficial religious leaders in Afghanistan sway over every action that they might deem contrary to their beliefs, which by extension and within the Afghan cultural context, could be regarded as
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Alliance for Open Society
    INTRODUCTION A Global Alliance for Open Society The goal of the Soros foundations network throughout the world is to transform closed societies into open ones and to protect and expand the values of existing open societies. In pursuit of this mission, the Open Society Institute (OSI) and the foundations established and supported by George Soros seek to strengthen open society principles and practices against authoritarian regimes and the negative consequences of globalization. The Soros network supports efforts in civil society, education, media, public health, and human and women’s rights, as well as social, legal, and economic reform. 6 SOROS FOUNDATIONS NETWORK | 2001 REPORT Our foundations and programs operate in more than ࡯ national government aid agencies, including the 50 countries in Central and Eastern Europe, the former United States Agency for International Soviet Union, Africa, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Development (USAID), Britain’s Department for the United States. International Development (DFID), the Swedish The Soros foundations network supports the concept International Development Cooperation Agency of open society, which, at its most fundamental level, is (SIDA), the Canadian International Development based on the recognition that people act on imperfect Agency (CIDA), the Dutch MATRA program, the knowledge and that no one is in possession of the ultimate Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation truth. In practice, an open society is characterized by the (SDC), the German Foreign Ministry, and a num- rule of law; respect for human rights, minorities, and ber of Austrian government agencies, including minority opinions; democratically elected governments; a the ministries of education and foreign affairs, market economy in which business and government are that operate bilaterally; separate; and a thriving civil society.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Political Briefing: Bulgarian President Rumen Radev Will Run for a Second Term Evgeniy Kandilarov
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 37, No. 1 (BG) February 2021 Bulgaria political briefing: Bulgarian President Rumen Radev will run for a Second Term Evgeniy Kandilarov 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Bulgarian President Rumen Radev will run for a Second Term One of the most significant political events in the last few weeks in Bulgaria was the announcement of the President Roumen Radev, on Februaty 1st, that he and the Vice President Iliana Yotova will run for a second term in office at the presidential elections scheduled for this fall. This became clear during a press conference at which the head of state reported on what had been done over the past four years. “Our candidacy at this time is an honest move for citizens and political figures,” he said in an hour-long speech, hailing his own presidency as a voice of reason during the last few years. President Rumen Radev took the office after winning a second round of voting in 2016 – against GERB candidate Tsetska Tsacheva. Radev and Iliana Yotova took the oath as president and vice president in the parliament on January 19, 2017.Three days later, on January 22, they officially took the office. Under the constitution, the presidential couple's term expires in January 2022. Elections for a new head of state will be in the fall but it is not yet clear whether they will be in October or November.
    [Show full text]
  • HOMECOMING 2011 • CHRISTIAN BORLE ’91 President’S Message DEAR SHADY SIDE ACADEMY of Talented Student Musicians, COMMUNITY: Singers, Actors and Artists
    WINTER 2011-2012 INSIDE: HOMECOMING 2011 • CHRISTIAN BORLE ’91 preSIDeNt’S Message DEAR SHADY SIDE ACADEMY of talented student musicians, COMMUNITY: singers, actors and artists. We are also lucky to have such an In November, I attended the Senior incredible facility, the Hillman School’s fall drama production, an Center for Performing Arts. adaptation of Shakespeare’s Romeo thanks to the tremendous work and Juliet. Classic Shakespearean lines of executive Director Sarah York were interspersed with contemporary Rubin, we see not only wonderful vernacular, and the result was a student performances at the thoughtful, humorous and evocative Hillman, but also an impressive performance. In fact, an extra show had schedule of performances by to be added to satisfy the demand for world-class professional artists. tickets. Led by first-year theater teacher One of my other favorite places is Dana Hardy-Bingham, Shady Side the Benedum Visual Arts Center, students participated in the writing of the an incredible space that originally play; the acting, of course; the live music; housed the Senior School’s and all of the behind-the-scenes work. power plant. At any given time, It was a fantastic way to harness the many visitors to the BVAC can observe feedback from our community to help talents of our students and make the show students sketching architectural designs, shape Shady Side’s next strategic plan, it a true SSA community production. exploring painting techniques or throwing has been rewarding to find that the arts is A few days earlier, I attended the a ceramic pot, with our accomplished now perceived as one of our strengths.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy 2013 Human Rights Report
    ITALY 2013 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Italy is a multi-party parliamentary democracy with a bicameral parliament consisting of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate. The constitution vests executive authority in the Council of Ministers, headed by a prime minister, whose official title is President of the Council. The President of the Republic, who is the head of state, nominates the prime minister after consulting with the leaders of all political parties in parliament. International observers considered the national parliamentary elections February 24-25 free and fair. The law requires the government maintain civilian control over all security forces. Civilian authorities failed at times to maintain effective control over the security forces, and there were some reports security forces committed human rights abuses. Principal human rights problems included substandard living conditions in detention centers for undocumented mixed migrant populations, governmental corruption, societal prejudice, and municipal government policies permitting the mistreatment of Roma, which exacerbated their social exclusion and restricted their access to education, health care, employment, and other social services. Other human rights problems included excessive and abusive use of force by police in some cases, overcrowded prisons, the continued incarceration of pretrial detainees with convicted criminals, an inefficient judicial system that did not always provide speedy justice, violence, and harassment against women, sexual exploitation of children, and anti-Semitic vandalism. Trafficking for sexual and labor exploitation occurred. Observers also reported cases of violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons and labor discrimination based on sexual orientation. Child labor and labor exploitation of irregular workers were also problems, especially in the service sector and the southern agricultural region.
    [Show full text]
  • Burma's Long Road to Democracy
    UNITED STATES InsTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 1200 17th Street NW • Washington, DC 20036 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT Priscilla Clapp A career officer in the U.S. Foreign Service, Priscilla Clapp served as U.S. chargé d’affaires and chief of mission in Burma (Myanmar) from June 1999 to August 2002. After retiring from the Foreign Service, she has continued to Burma’s Long Road follow events in Burma closely and wrote a paper for the United States Institute of Peace entitled “Building Democracy in Burma,” published on the Institute’s Web site in July 2007 as Working Paper 2. In this Special to Democracy Report, the author draws heavily on her Working Paper to establish the historical context for the Saffron Revolution, explain the persistence of military rule in Burma, Summary and speculate on the country’s prospects for political transition to democracy. For more detail, particularly on • In August and September 2007, nearly twenty years after the 1988 popular uprising the task of building the institutions for stable democracy in Burma, public anger at the government’s economic policies once again spilled in Burma, see Working Paper 2 at www.usip.org. This into the country’s city streets in the form of mass protests. When tens of thousands project was directed by Eugene Martin, and sponsored by of Buddhist monks joined the protests, the military regime reacted with brute force, the Institute’s Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention. beating, killing, and jailing thousands of people. Although the Saffron Revolution was put down, the regime still faces serious opposition and unrest.
    [Show full text]
  • Caspian Pipeline Consortium, Bellwether of Russia's Investment
    Caspian Pipeline Consortium, Bellwether of Russia’s Investment Climate? Adrian Dellecker June 2008 Russia/NIS Center Ifri is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debates and research activities. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ alone and do not reflect the official views of their institutions. Russia/NIS Center © All rights reserved – Ifri – Paris, 2008 ISBN IFRI IFRI-Bruxelles 27 RUE DE LA PROCESSION RUE MARIE-THERESE, 21 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15 – FRANCE 1000 BRUXELLES TEL. : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 TEL. : 32(2) 238 51 10 FAX : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 FAX : 32 (2) 238 51 15 E-MAIL : [email protected] E-MAIL : [email protected] WEBSITE : www.ifri.org A. Dellecker / Caspian Pipeline Consortium Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an electronic collection dedicated to Russia and the other new independent states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan). Written by leading experts, these policy-oriented papers deal with strategic, political, and economic issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Secrecy in an Open Society Nicholas A
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2011 Secrecy in an Open Society Nicholas A. Poli Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Poli, Nicholas A., "Secrecy in an Open Society" (2011). Honors Theses. 1045. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/1045 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Secrecy in an Open Society By Nick Poli ********* Submitted in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for Honors in the Departments of Political Science and Philosophy UNION COLLEGE June, 2011 i Abstract POLI, NICK Secrecy in an Open Society. Departments of Political Science and Philosophy, June 2011 Advisors: Tom Lobe and Leo Zaibert This thesis explores the difficult task of finding a balance of secrecy and openness in America. The common notion is that America is an open society; however, with an intelligence community predicated upon secrecy, an imbalance of power between the Executive and Congress, a media which does not always report objective news, and a complacent American public, openness ultimately becomes more difficult to maintain. To find a balance, I propose a hypothetical spectrum of openness in which there is a straight line with two endpoints- one endpoint representing complete secrecy, the other complete openness. I argue that both ends of the spectrum are extreme and undesirable and that America’s goal should be to err on the side of more openness while maintaining responsible secrecy.
    [Show full text]
  • Javakheti After the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia
    Javakheti after the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia Hedvig Lohm ECMI Working Paper #38 April 2007 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) ECMI Headquarters: Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor) D-24939 Flensburg Germany +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 Internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper #38 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Marc Weller Copyright 2007 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in April 2007 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) ISSN: 1435-9812 2 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................4 II. JAVAKHETI IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC TERMS ...........................................................5 1. The Current Socio-Economic Situation .............................................................................6 2. Transformation of Agriculture ...........................................................................................8 3. Socio-Economic Dependency on Russia .......................................................................... 10 III. DIFFERENT ACTORS IN JAVAKHETI ................................................................... 12 1. Tbilisi influence on Javakheti .......................................................................................... 12 2. Role of Armenia and Russia ............................................................................................. 13 3. International
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin's United Russia
    VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVICH PUTIN’S UNITED RUSSIA: THE HOW AND WHY OF RUSSIA’S NEW PARTY OF POWER THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Daniel James Sell, B.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2008 Thesis Committee: Approved By Professor Trevor Brown, Adviser _____________________________ Adviser Professor David Hoffmann Slavic and East European Studies Graduate Program Copyright by Daniel James Sell 2008 ABSTRACT This paper serves to study the new ‘party of power,’ United Russia, that has emerged in the Russian Federation with Vladimir Vladimorovich Putin as the head of this party. It will look at what exactly a party of power is, and how Putin was able to solidify power in the country in the office of the president and transfer this power to United Russia. This paper looks at factors, such as the fact that Russia has a hybrid regime in place, which made it possible for the party of power to emerge, thus providing a small roadmap on how to create a party of power. Finally, this paper shows areas where Putin and his party of power could lose strength and what might possibly happen in regards to the political situation in the country if this were to happen. ii Dedicated to my father iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my advisor, Trevor Brown, for support, encouragement, enthusiasm, flexibility in working long-distance on this project, and patience. Without his help, this thesis would not have been possible. I would also like to thank David Hoffmann, who so graciously agreed to serve on my thesis defense committee.
    [Show full text]