CIES Perspectives Spring 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CIES Perspectives Spring 2021 Spring 2021 Photo Courtesy of Iveta Silova Perspectives From the Editors 2 Adaptive-Proactive Community-Engaged 29 Matthew Witenstein, Tavis D. Jules, Richard Arnold Responses To Covid-19: Stories and Reflections From the President 3 From Bhopal and Mahbubnagar, India Iveta Silova Pooja Iyengar, Srinivas Akula, Navatha Kanike, Radhika Iyengar, Matthew A Witenstein CER News 4 Bjorn H. Nordtveit SIGnatures Environmental and Sustainability Education SIG 32 Featured Board Member 5 Contemplative Inquiry and Holistic Education SIG 32 Amber Gove South Asia SIG 33 Cies Fellowship Award Winners Higher Education SIG 34 Joel Samoff 7 Monitoring and Evaluation SIG 34 Mark Ginsburg 10 Latin American SIG 35 Dan Wagner 12 New Books 36 Teaching Corner 13 Jennifer Swift-Morgan Sundry Reflections on the 65th Anniversary of the 38 Comparative and International Education Society Lended/Hybrid Teaching and Learning; 16 Erwin H. Epstein Opportunities and Challenges Araz Khajarian WCCES Update for CIES Perspectives 42 N’Dri T. Assié-Lumumba Displaced Students and CARES Act Funding 18 Archive & Records Keeping: 44 Lisa Unangst Building a Calatrava Bridge to Our Future? Utilizing the Power of a Network In Response 20 Esther E. Gottlieb To A Global Education Emergency: How the Inter-Agency In Memoriam Network For Education In Emergencies (INEE) Has Nicholas Stans Shawa 47 Responded To COVID-19 Robert A. Rhoads 49 Sarah Montgomery John Hawkins 50 When Our Own History Erases Us 22 Rich Arnold CIES Seattle 2021 52 Covid-19, Race and Racism: What Does the Field of 26 Comparative International Education have to Say? Sharon Walker www.cies.us COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY perspectives Letter from the Editors TAVIS D. JULES AND MATTHEW A. WITENSTEIN, EDITORS Tavis D. Jules Richard Arnold Matthew A. Witenstein Editor Editorial Assistant Editor Welcome to the Spring Issue of Perspectives. With so much uncertainty in the world, we are hard-pressed to always be forward-looking. But sometimes, reflection on the past is the best step towards mindfulness in a world searching for a better future. There is much for us to reflect on this year. It is 65 years since William Brickman founded what would become the Comparative and International Education Society. It is 20 years since the terrorist attacks of 9/11 upended foreign policy in the US and beyond. And, as of the publication of this issue, it is just over 1 year since massive lockdowns swept the world in the wake of COVID-19. Considering the impact of these events we invite you to reflect on what you have learned in light of the changes in the world. With the theme of reflection in mind, we invite you to read Erwin Epstein’s reflection on 65 years of the Comparative and International Education Society. We would also like to present some words from the past several recipients of the CIES fellowship award, including Mark Ginsburg, Joel Samoff, and Dan Wagner. Please take a moment to read about the lives and contributions of those we have lost in our obituaries. Special guest authors have contributed pieces on hybrid education models, historical US citizenship goals, and displaced students, among others. Finally, we have updates and an overview of the first virtual conference for CIES in April. When reflecting on his career, the philosopher Michel de Montaigne reminds us, “If I speak of myself in different ways, that is because I look at myself in different ways.” Consider the ways our world has changed, and how scholars and academics have changed in the way we look at the world. We at CIES work to provide the tools with which to do that. As you read through, consider: how do I see myself differently, as an academic, a teacher, a student, as a person? Finally, we welcome you to vCIES 2021 under the theme of Social Responsibility within Changing Contexts. Good luck with your presentations and wishing you all an engaging conference. We hope to publish in our next issues some reflections on the conference, so please send us your thoughts. SPRING 2021 2 perspectives Letter from the President IVETA SILOVA, PRESIDENT, CIES (2020-21) Although 2020 is over, its turbulent to the Biden/Harris administration, trajectory continues into 2021 — from along with a similar statement the tragic impact of the COVID‑19 issued by the World Congress of pandemic, to the widening political Comparative Education Societies division and economic inequality, to (WCCES). We have worked closely the intensifying climate crisis, just with our colleagues at the Global to name a few. 2020 has exposed Campaign for Education to serious problems with how the coordinate action in bringing this US politics, private economy, and important issue to the national entire way of living (and being) policy agenda. We believe that our have developed over the last several work is gaining some traction and decades. The COVID-19 epidemic has that the US reengagement with further compounded these problems, UNESCO is now a matter of ‘when’, revealing glaring racial and class not ‘if’. In recent interviews, the US inequalities in access to health care Ambassador to the United Nations and economic safety nets, as well (UN), Linda Thomas-Greenfield, has as job security and wages. As the passionately argued that “we need immense impact of the pandemic Iveta Silova to be at the table” with the United continues to reverberate globally, it Nations, referring to the UN as “an affects us personally, professionally, and academically in indispensable institution for advancing peace, security, and significant ways, and it continues to claim more lives than our collective well-being.” I am excited and proud that CIES we could have ever imagined. My deepest condolences go has played such an active role in supporting efforts for the US out to the friends and colleagues who have lost their loved re-engagement with UNESCO — not only recently, but also ones and to everyone who has suffered — and continues to over the course of the CIES history (for more information, suffer — during this pandemic. please listen to an engaging podcast with our colleague Aaron Benavot, who was recently interviewed by Alexander While the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic is Draxler, a NORRAG Senior Advisor, formerly at UNESCO unlikely to change significantly over the next several and a longtime CIES member). I would like to thank all of months, some major changes are happening on the our colleagues who have been working behind the scenes to political front. With the inauguration of the Biden/Harris mobilize our academic and professional networks to further administration, we are witness to some exciting historical advance this important policy agenda. ‘firsts’ in US politics: Kamala Harris as the first female, Black American, and person of South Asian descent elected As we move forward, CIES has a tremendous opportunity Vice President; Dr. Jill Biden as the first First Lady holding and an important responsibility to continue its efforts an Ed.D. and the first one to keep her job as an English in social and policy engagement both nationally and professor at Northern Virginia Community College during internationally — as well as within its open operations Biden’s Presidency; Avril Haines as the first female national — in the face of complex and continuous challenges intelligence chief; and an all-female communications that range from the role of education in institutionalized team! Meanwhile, President Biden is moving quickly to racism and systemic social injustice to COVID-19 and the dismantle Trump’s damaging legacy by reversing course climate crisis. To address the challenges that loom ahead on immigration, climate, racial equity, and the handling and to undo the damaging legacies of the previous of the coronavirus pandemic. Just on the first day of the US administration — while simultaneously striving to Biden/Harris administration, the United States rejoined the envision radically different futures — will require hard Paris Agreement and World Health Organization, bringing work, creative energy, and collective action. I count the United States back to collective policy action on the on the CIES community to play an active role in this national and international scale! historic moment. On a related front, the CIES Statement Urging the United States to Rejoin UNESCO has been successfully delivered SPRING 2021 3 perspectives CER News BJORN H. NORDTVEIT, EDITOR Comparative Education Review Comparative Education Review’s Ethical Procedures: “CERethics” How can an Editorial Board hold itself accountable for being ethical in its decision-making? How can we ensure transparency in our decisions? These are some of the questions the Comparative Education Review (CER) editors, volunteer Advisory Board Members, and a Senior Publisher from the University of Chicago Press have examined during several meetings in 2020 and 2021. We have very rarely heard Bjorn H. Nordtveit back from authors about perceived discrimination (to my recollection, we have received written negative feedback only three times during our more than seven years of service).1 However, in addition to these three cases, we understand that other authors may have felt it difficult to speak up against an editorial decision. After much reflection and consultation, we have instituted a process for review of cases where the author(s) has/have felt our decisions were erroneous and showed an unjust or prejudicial treatment, especially on the grounds of race, color, religion, or gender. We want our editor desk reviews and subsequent double-blind peer reviews to continue being efficient and just.2 If any of our decisions can be perceived as discriminatory in any way, we want to address that. Accordingly, we have created a statement for the CER webpage: The Comparative Education Review Editors, Peer Reviewers, Managing Editors, Advisory Board Members and associated staff do not and shall not discriminate on the basis of personal characteristics, including race, color, religion, gender, gender expression, age, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, employer or job status in any of their activities.
Recommended publications
  • Religious Liberty Actions Taken by Trump Administration 2017 on May
    Religious Liberty Actions Taken By Trump Administration 2017 ● On May 4, 2017, President Trump signed an executive order that ensures religious organizations are protected from discrimination. ● In October 2017, the Trump administration announced that the U.S. will provide direct assistance to persecuted Christians in the Middle East. 2018 ● On January 2, 2018, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) announced changes in federal disaster funding that would include private non-profit houses of worship. ● In January 2018, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the formation of a Conscience and Religious Freedom Division within the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR). The purpose of the division is to "restore federal enforcement of our nation's laws that protect the fundamental and unalienable right of conscience and religious freedom." ● In January 2018, the Justice Department designated a new section in the U.S. Attorney’s Manual specifically devoted to the protection of religious liberty. The section, entitled The "Associate Attorney General’s Approval and Notice Requirements for Issues Implicating Religious Liberty" will require all U.S. Attorney Offices to set up a point of contact for any civil suit involving religious freedom or liberty. ● In May 2018, President Trump signed an executive order to establish a White House Faith and Opportunity Initiative. The Initiative would "provide recommendations on the Administration’s policy agenda affecting faith based and community programs; provide recommendations on programs and policies where faith-based and community organizations may partner and/or deliver more effective solutions to poverty; apprise the Administration of any failures of the executive branch to comply with religious liberty protections under law; and reduce the burdens on the exercise of free religion." ● On July 30, 2018, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Restored Republic Via a GCR As of Jan
    Click here if you'd like to Donate to THE NEAL SHOW - THANKS !! Click here to see PAST SHOWS or get the Newsletter ~ Please share this with friends who may be interested ~ lkjlkjlj THE NEAL SHOW ~Community, Architecture and the Individual~ *** You can email me at [email protected] if you would like to be added to the list of subscribers to this newsletter. !! THE NEAL SHOW !! For the time being, I will be pre-recording shows and mounting them on the “PAST SHOWS” menu item you will see in the upper right hand corner of the "nealshow.com" website. I hope to have shows posted for you by Saturday between 1:00 and 4:00 PM. THIS IS THE TEMPORARY LINK TO ALL SHOWS FROM THIS DATE FORWARD. {{ http://www.nealshow.com/page/past_shows }} *** “My judgment is not delayed for I sit upon my throne each day and I bless and I punish, but the fullness of my wrath shall not come until the days when darkness declares itself victor and when my harvest of mercy has been a blessing unto the inhabitants of all the earth. In my hand is a cup and this means that my punishment has already been established and prepared and it will not be stayed and it will not pass. I will pour out my wrath upon the ones who seek darkness and walk therein and my wrath shall also be unto all who support the ways of 1 darkness and those who strive against light and truth. Look unto me and trust in me and understand that those who see the rainbow must also endure the storm.” ~David Nix *** Humility is the key to finding god.
    [Show full text]
  • DAILY FAVORITES from 2020: Note the Dates Are in Reverse Order with the Most Recent at the Top of the Page
    DAILY FAVORITES from 2020: Note the dates are in reverse order with the most recent at the top of the page. [December 25-31, 2020] My Daily Favorites will restart on Jan 1, 2021. [December 24, 2020] The American Mind: 1. Professor John Eastman’s Response to the Latest Manifestation of Chapman Cancel Culture - https://americanmind.org/salvo/professor-john-eastmans-response-to-the-latest- manifestation-of-chapman-cancel-culture/ 2. In Defense of Stigma - https://americanmind.org/salvo/in-defense-of-stigma/ [December 23, 2020] Gatestone Institute: 1. Drug Trafficking: The Dirtiest Little Secret - https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16874/mexico-border-drug-trafficking 2. The EU Needs to Stand Up for the Human Rights It Proclaims - https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16871/eu-human-rights-china [December 22, 2020] Manhattan Contrarian: 1. Your Christmas Present: Our Political Leaders Are Killing Off New York City - https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2020-12-21-christmas-present-our-political- leaders-are-killing-off-new-york-city 2. Our Meaningless Measure of Poverty - https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/annals-of- poverty/ [December 21, 2020] George Shultz: 1. The 10 most important things I’ve learned about trust over my 100 years - https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/12/11/10-most-important-things-ive- learned-about-trust-over-my-100-years/ 2. George Shultz: A Century of Wisdom - https://www.hoover.org/research/george-shultz- century-wisdom [December 20, 2020] Gatestone Institute: 1. China: The Conquest of Hollywood - https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16842/china- films-hollywood-censorship 2. To Europe with Love: "Diplomats" or Terrorists from Iran's Mullahs? - https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16867/iran-diplomats-terrorists-europe [December 19, 2020] The American Prospect: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the University of Baltimore School of Law‟S Center on Applied Feminism for Its Fourth Annual Feminist Legal Theory Conference
    Submission to the University of Baltimore School of Law‟s Center on Applied Feminism for its Fourth Annual Feminist Legal Theory Conference. “Applying Feminism Globally.” Feminism from an African and Matriarchal Culture Perspective How Ancient Africa’s Gender Sensitive Laws and Institutions Can Inform Modern Africa and the World Fatou Kiné CAMARA, PhD Associate Professor of Law, Faculté des Sciences Juridiques et Politiques, Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, SENEGAL “The German experience should be regarded as a lesson. Initially, after the codification of German law in 1900, academic lectures were still based on a study of private law with reference to Roman law, the Pandectists and Germanic law as the basis for comparison. Since 1918, education in law focused only on national law while the legal-historical and comparative possibilities that were available to adapt the law were largely ignored. Students were unable to critically analyse the law or to resist the German socialist-nationalism system. They had no value system against which their own legal system could be tested.” Du Plessis W. 1 Paper Abstract What explains that in patriarchal societies it is the father who passes on his name to his child while in matriarchal societies the child bears the surname of his mother? The biological reality is the same in both cases: it is the woman who bears the child and gives birth to it. Thus the answer does not lie in biological differences but in cultural ones. So far in feminist literature the analysis relies on a patriarchal background. Not many attempts have been made to consider the way gender has been used in matriarchal societies.
    [Show full text]
  • CREC-2021-02-08.Pdf
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2021 No. 23 House of Representatives The House met at 2 p.m. and was forward and lead the House in the ganizational meeting on Thursday, February called to order by the Speaker. Pledge of Allegiance. 4, 2021. Sincerely, f Mr. MOONEY led the Pledge of Alle- giance as follows: PETER A. DEFAZIO, PRAYER Chair. I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the RULE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS The Chaplain, Reverend Margaret United States of America, and to the Repub- (a) Applicability of House Rules.— lic for which it stands, one nation under God, Grun Kibben, offered the following (1) In General.—The Rules of the House are indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. prayer: the rules of the Committee and its sub- Eternal God, into Your hands we f committees so far as applicable, except that commend this day, a great American a motion to recess from day to day, and a statesman, George Schultz. His patri- MOMENT OF SILENCE IN REMEM- motion to dispense with the first reading (in otism and unwavering principles serve full) of a bill or resolution, if printed copies BRANCE OF THE HONORABLE are available, are non-debatable privileged as an example of a life lived in response RON WRIGHT to Your calling. Remind us that this is motions in the Committee and its sub- committees. a calling to which You call each one of The SPEAKER.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Conditions in Cameroon: the Narratives Of
    PRISON CONDITIONS IN CAMEROON: THE NARRATIVES OF FEMALE INMATES by HELEN NAMONDO FONTEBO submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF LITERATURE AND PHILOSOPHY in the subject SOCIOLOGY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR ME RABE JUNE 2013 SUMMARY PRISON CONDITIONS IN CAMEROON: THE NARRATIVES OF FEMALE INMATES This study explores and critically analyses the lived experiences of female inmates in six selected prisons in Cameroon. The study contributes to the available knowledge regarding prison conditions from the perspectives of female inmates– a subject which has been under researched globally and has received little attention from researchers in Cameroon. The Cameroon Penitentiary Regulation (CPR) professes to be gender neutral and, therefore, it ignores the special needs of female inmates. The central research question is: How do the national policies and laws on prison conditions in Cameroon relate to the lived and narrated experiences of female inmates? The study is informed by two major frameworks, namely, Foucault’s analytical framework from his seminal work Discipline and Punish (1977) and a feminist analytical framework, standpoint feminism, which fills the gap in Foucault’s thesis that is largely devoid of gender analysis. The study is qualitative, using in-depth interviews and observations. It involved a sample of 38 research participants, comprising 18 female inmates, 18 prison staff members and two NGO representatives. The findings reveal that both international and national ratified policies are merely “paperwork”, lacking effective implementation in the prisons selected for this study. There is a general lack of infrastructural facilities in prisons and this prevents classification as suggested by the CPR 1992 and ratified international instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • 'We All Believe in the Same God'
    Wageningen University and Research Centre Department of Social Sciences M.Sc. Thesis Sociology of Development and Change ‘We all believe in the same god’ Urban youth perceptions on boundaries between religious groups in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Imme Widdershoven August 2020 931021969130 Programme: M.Sc. International Development Studies Supervisor: Dr. Gemma van der Haar Specialization: Sociology of Development and Change - Second examiner: Dr. Lotje de Vries Conflict, development and disaster Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor dr. Gemma van der Haar for her excellent guidance and feedback. As the writing process has been long and wavering, I am also very grateful for your patience and flexibility. Thanks to the Wageningen Writing Lab for facilitating a little writing club, and thanks to my club members for each morning’s motivation. I thank my parents, Merel and Wolf for bearing with me throughout the entire thesis writing process – it has been four years and yet you still love me! I want to thank everyone who contributed to making my research in Cameroon possible. I owe a lot to Dupleix Kuenzob, who facilitated my stay in Cameroon, introduced me to his colleagues and made sure I was invited to all meetings and events he thought could be useful for my research. I also thank dr. Ndi Richard Tanto for his warm welcome at the airport and his kind help and company during the months I spent in the lodging facilities of his organisation. A special thanks goes out to Cédric and his friends for their support and translations during the interviews with motor taxi drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Spies of Mississippi to the Eyes of the White House: Surveilling and Obstructing Antiracist Work in the U.S
    The Professional Educator 2021, © 2021 Kamden K. Strunk, Leslie Ann Locke, Jin Chang, Peter W. Clancy, & Logan Drake Advance Online Publication https://doi.org/10.47038/tpe.44.01.03 From the Spies of Mississippi to the Eyes of the White House: Surveilling and Obstructing Antiracist Work in the U.S. Kamden K. Strunk Leslie Ann Locke Jin Chang Peter W. Clancy Logan Drake Auburn University University of Iowa University of Iowa University of Iowa University of Iowa We write this editorial at the end of the Trump described neo-Nazi demonstrators as “very fine presidential administration. There is much to be written people” (Phelps, 2019, para. 1), was widely interpreted about this period in U.S. government and public life. as being supportive of white supremacist militia groups As of this writing, the current U.S. president and his like the Proud Boys (Aleem, 2019) and rejected an lawyers continue pursuing ill-destined litigation to opportunity to denounce them during a presidential attempt to overturn an election result that saw him debate, called antiracist demonstrators during the ousted from office (Landau et al., 2020). The U.S., and summer of 2020 “thugs” (Wise, 2020, para. 9), most of the world, remain embroiled in the worst public dispatched federal agents to violently suppress protests health crisis in over a century (Freire-Paspuel et al., in several U.S. cities (Zimmerman, 2020), and 2020). The onslaught of police violence against people deployed teargas outside of a church in order to clear and communities of Color continues (Hayes et al., clergy and protestors to enable a presidential 2000), as do mass protest movements and efforts to photoshoot (Schake, 2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Revokes Trump's 'Patriotic Education' Order, Will Shield DACA
    Biden Revokes Trump’s ‘Patriotic Education’ Order, Will Shield DACA By Andrew Ujifusa — January 20, 2021 Joe Biden departs a news conference after introducing his nominees and appointees to economic policy posts Dec. 1 in Wilmington, Del. Andrew Harnik/AP President Joe Biden moved to “preserve and fortify” executive action that shields certain undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as young children, said in an executive order that laws that prohibit sex discrimination also prohibit discrimination against gender identity, and in another executive order initiated a government-wide push to emphasize racial equity on his first day as president. Biden also revoked an executive order from outgoing President Donald Trump that created a commission to promote “patriotic education” in schools and elsewhere. That group, the 1776 Commission released a report Monday that lamented what it called the role of identity politics and the progressive movement in historical studies; it was criticized by many historians for how it treated slavery and other elements of American history. Biden took these and several other executive actions Wednesday, when he was inaugurated as the nation’s 46th president. For months, Biden has pledged to reverse Trump administration actions on a variety of fronts, including on hot-button education issues. Wednesday’s raft of executive orders accomplished that goal, and also demonstrated his administration’s early priorities. “These actions are bold, begin the work of following through on President-elect Biden’s promises to the American people, and, importantly, fall within the constitutional role for the president,” Biden’s transition team said in a statement Wednesday.
    [Show full text]
  • I Appreciate the Spirit of the Rule Change, and I Agree That We All
    From: Javed Abbas To: stevens, cheryl Subject: Comment On Proposed Rule Change - 250.2 Date: Saturday, March 27, 2021 8:42:43 PM Attachments: image002.png I appreciate the spirit of the rule change, and I agree that we all likely benefit by understanding the fundamental ways in which we are all connected, and that our society will either succeed or fail primarily based on our ability to cooperate with each other and treat each other fairly. However, I do not support the rule change because I do not think it will have the effect of making us more inclusive because of the ways humans tend to react when forced to do things. There will inevitably be push back from a group of people who do not support the spirit of the rule, that push back will probably be persuasive to people who don’t have strong feelings about the ideas one way or the other but will feel compelled to oppose the ideas because it will be portrayed as part of a political movement that they are inclined to oppose, and ultimately the Rule that is supposed to help us become more inclusive will actually help drive us further apart. I do think it’s a great idea to offer these CLEs and let them compete on equal footing in the marketplace of ideas. Rule Change: "Rule 250.2. CLE Requirements (1) CLE Credit Requirement. Every registered lawyer and every judge must complete 45 credit hours of continuing legal education during each applicable CLE compliance period as provided in these rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith-Inspired Organizations and Global Development Policy a Background Review “Mapping” Social and Economic Development Work
    BERKLEY CENTER for RELIGION, PEACE & WORLD AFFAIRS GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY 2009 | Faith-Inspired Organizations and Global Development Policy A Background Review “Mapping” Social and Economic Development Work in Europe and Africa BERKLEY CENTER REPORTS A project of the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs and the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University Supported by the Henry R. Luce Initiative on Religion and International Affairs Luce/SFS Program on Religion and International Affairs From 2006–08, the Berkley Center and the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service (SFS) col- laborated in the implementation of a generous grant from the Henry Luce Foundation’s Initiative on Religion and International Affairs. The Luce/SFS Program on Religion and International Affairs convenes symposia and seminars that bring together scholars and policy experts around emergent issues. The program is organized around two main themes: the religious sources of foreign policy in the US and around the world, and the nexus between religion and global development. Topics covered in 2007–08 included the HIV/AIDS crisis, faith-inspired organizations in the Muslim world, gender and development, religious freedom and US foreign policy, and the intersection of religion, migration, and foreign policy. The Berkley Center The Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs, created within the Office of the President in March 2006, is part of a university-wide effort to build knowledge about religion’s role in world affairs and promote interreligious understanding in the service of peace. The Center explores the inter- section of religion with contemporary global challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Administration Allies Have Burrowed Into 24 Critical Civil Service Positions and 187 Last-Minute Appointments
    Trump Administration Allies Have Burrowed Into 24 Critical Civil Service Positions And 187 Last-Minute Appointments SUMMARY: Following the outgoing administration’s “quiet push to salt federal agencies with Trump loyalists,” an Accountable.US review has found that, as of February 22, 2021, at least 24 Trump administration political appointees have “burrowed” into long-term civil service jobs in the new Biden administration. This includes at least four figures in the national security apparatus, nine figures with environmental regulators, three figures in the Department of Justice, two figures in the embattled Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and at least six other appointees elsewhere who have refused to step down in the transition. Burrowing of this sort is not treated lightly, as officials who transfer from political appointments to career positions must undergo scrutiny by federal personnel overseers for a full five years—and some of these cases have been found to violate federal laws and have drawn congressional scrutiny. However, there is a much wider slate of concerning Trump administration appointments that are not subject to such strict oversight: During the Trump administration’s waning days following the 2020 election, it announced 187 last-minute appointments to various boards, commissions, and councils that don’t require Senate confirmation. While some of these appointments have already drawn alarm for going to campaign staffers, megadonors, and top administration allies, Accountable.US has unearthed even more troubling names in Trump’s outgoing deluge. Similar to how early Trump administration personnel picks were directly conflicted against the offices they served, many of these late Trump appointments are woefully underqualified or have histories directly at odds with the positions to which they were named—and they are likely to stay in long into the Biden administration.
    [Show full text]