Pastoral Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pastoral Review homiletic& pastoral review FEBRUARY 1995 2 Worth noting 3 Letters from our readers 8 As the seminarian, so the priest Editor By Gerald E. Murray and Charles M. Mangan Kenneth Baker, S.J. Advice to seminarians on spiritual andpersonal growth. Publisher Catholic Polls, Inc. 16 The crisis in eucharistic faith Contributing editor By Germain Grisez and Russell Shaw Msgr. Wm. B. Smith It is timefor a serious, renewedeucharistic catechesis. Assistant editor Mary M. Bolan 22 The annulment mentality: What you can do about it General manager By Clarence J. Hettinger Bernard Belson Unfounded doubtsofmarriage validity can bedetected Circulation manager Phara Vincent in the rectory. Advertising manager 33 Homilies on the liturgy of the Sundays and feasts Elizabeth Schmitz Homiletic & Pastoral Review is By Robert S. Hewes owned and published by 44 In defense of rote religion Catholic Polls, Inc., 86 Riverside Dr., New York, N.Y. 10024. By James O'Callaghan Editor, Kenneth Baker. Rote learning, piety and morality promotes more Telephone: (212) 799-2600. HPR intellectual honesty, more religious experience appears monthly, except bi monthly for August-September, and more charity. and is available on Microfilm 50 Threat to Christianity? through Xerox University By William G. Most Microfilms, Inc., 300 North Zeeb Rd., Ann Arbor, Mich. Do the Dead Sea Scrolls harm the Church? 48106. Second class postage paid 54 The forgotten sacrament for at New York, N.Y. and at By Madeleine Grace additional offices. © Catholic Polls, Inc. 1995. The life-giving power of Confession needs to be Address all correspondence to proclaimed. Kenneth Baker, S.J., 59 Memory and preaching 86 Riverside Drive, New York, N.Y. 10024. By Leo R. Sands Rates: U.S. and Possessions - Emphasis on the written wordhadled to neglect ofthe $24.00 per year; $44 for two years. oral word. Foreign-$25.00 per year; $45 for two years. Payable in U.S. funds. 62 A new look at St. Aloysius Gonzaga Single copies available at $4.00 By Clifford Stevens per copy postpaid. A renaissance prince, he abdicated his princedom and Foreign currency accepted. Postmaster: Send address changes to its powers. Homiletic & Pastoral Review, 65 My favorite priest-From banker to missionary 86 Riverside Drive, New York, N.Y. By Bernard Hwang 10024. 68 Questions answered by Wm. B. Smith 70 Book reviews Publication No. USPS 889-740 ISSN No. 0018-4268 80 How is this possible?-Editorial Volume XCV, No. 5 FEBRUARY 1995 1 In theface of the current crisis, there is obvious needfor a serious, renewed eucharistic catechesis. The crisis in eucharistic faith By Germain Grisez and Russell Shaw • Her husband having died while on an was not just a symbol? Suppose it was, Italian trip undertaken in hopes ofrestor as her Catholic friends believed, the Real inghishealth, theAmerican womanstayed Presence of JesusChrist?Then Paul'swords on for a while in Italy with business asso made altogether good sense. ciates of her late spouse. Her hosts were A few monthslater, Mrs. Elizabeth Se- devout Catholics whose devotion to the ton returned to New York, and the fol Eucharist impressed the widow, an Epis lowing year she was received into the Cath copalian. olic Church. Sometimes she attended Mass with her This incident from the life ofSaint Eliz friends, and one day a non-Catholic tour abethSetonisworthrecalling forthelight ist whispered a skeptical remark to her it sheds notonlyuponthecentrality inCath at the consecration. Shocked, she found oliclife of eucharistic faith but alsoupon herself pondering St. Paul's words in his a possible approachto restoringsuch faith First Epistle to the Corinthians: "For all among those American Catholics whose be who eat and drink without discerningthe liefintheReal Presence has notsimply grown bodyeat and drink judgment againstthem dim but, seemingly, been extinguished. selves" (1 Cor. 11:29). The point is that the New Testament and It struck her that this admonition made the whole Catholic tradition testify in un little or no senseifthe BlessedSacrament, mistakable terms to the fact that the con as her Episcopalian faith led her to be secration of the bread and wine changes lieve, were only a symbol ofChrist's pres them into the body and blood of Christ. ence. Paul would hardly have issued so Not to believethis trivializes Scriptureand dire a warning against taking a casualview the doctrine of the Church. of a symbol. But suppose the Eucharist And today, it appears, many Ameri- 16 HOMILETIC & PASTORAL REVIEW can Catholics do notbelieve it. In the gen bert Weakland, O.S.B., of Milwaukee, who eral crisis of the Church in the United called the findings "certainly an alarm bell," States, noindividual crisis ismoreserious particularly because beliefinthe RealPres and urgentthan this one. This is so not ence is thetouchstone ofbeliefin so much leastbecause,aswe shallsee,this collapse else the Church holds dear. ("Future of ofeucharistic faith is related, as both cause Faith Worries Catholic Leaders," The New and effect, to the broader crisis. York Times, June 1, 1994) The latest evidence that many Catho Analarm bell indeed. Is anybody listen lics do not believe in the Real Presence ing? OneisremindedofFlannery O'Con was supplied last spring in a New York nor's earthy but accurate remark about Times/CBS poll. Among its findingswas the Blessed Sacrament: "Ifit's only a sym that roughly two adult Catholics out of bol, then I say the hell with it." O'Connor three in the United States think that at ofcourse possessedrobust Catholic faith Mass the bread and wine, rather than be in the Real Presence, as apparently did ing changed intoChrist's bodyandblood, most of her coreligionists as recently as serve asmere"symbolicreminders" ofhim. thirty years ago. Now many do not, and, The figurewas 70% for the two youngest asArchbishop Weakland pointsout, the col age groups surveyed (those aged 18-29 lapseoftheir faith in this centralelement and 30-44) and 58% for those in the 45- of Catholic belief signals a still broader 64 age group. crisis of faith. Even among Catholics 65 and older, What happened? The answer is com 45% held the "symbolic reminder" view plex but it is by no means obscure. ofthe Eucharist, while only 51% consid One fundamental cause lies in the per eredthe sacred species to be Christ'sbody vasive secularization of Western culture and blood. Moreover, contrary to what underwayfor the lastseveral centuries and many peoplewould expect, even the ma still continuing. Grounded in a rational jority (51%) of those who said they go ism and scientism that are themselves ideo to Mass weekly or almost weekly think logically-based rather thantruly rational, of the Eucharist as a mere symbol. this secularization process has made be Were these isolated, unrepresentative lief in anythingof a supernaturaland tran findings? Evidentlynot. Other polls have scendent nature more subjectively difficult produced similar results. Times religion for many persons than it was in earlier writer Peter Steinfels summed up the im times. It is modernity's great challenge to plications with mordant accuracy: "For religion. And even though the Catholic centuries, and especially sincethe Refor Church in the United States, without be mation, the church has insisted upon the ingfullyconscious of whatshewasdoing, actual change of the bread and wine into successfully shielded many of her mem the 'real presence' of Christ as a defining bers from its effects until well into this cen mark ofthe Mass. This emphasis on 'sac- tury, her ability to do so has diminished ramentality,' on God's life-giving action sharply(and, it seems, at an accelerating through material signs and physical acts- rate)asthe assimilationofCatholics into water,wine, layingon ofhands, allmedi a rapidly secularizing cultural mainstream atedby astructuredchurch—hasbeenthe has proceeded apace since World War II. hallmark ofthe Catholic approach to wor Factors outside the Church have been ship." Steinfels quoted Archbishop Rem- reinforcedby factors within. Back in the FEBRUARY 1995 17 1960sseveral theologians advanced theo ries of Christ's presence in the Eucharist according to which the reality of bread and wine is changed precisely because of the change in their meaning (transignifi- cation) and use (transfinalization) in the liturgy. In the encyclical Mysterium Fidei (September 3,1965) Pope Paul VI rejected these views. He wrote: As a result of transubstantiation, the species ofbreadand wineundoubtedly take on anew signification and a new finality, for they are no longer ordinary bread and wine but instead a sign of something sacred anda sign of spiri tual food; but theytake on thisnewsignifica tion, thisnew finality, precisely because they contain a new reality, which we can rightly call ontological [i.e., pertaining towhat objec tively is, independent of human thought and desire]. For what now lies beneath the afore into Christ's body and blood is accom mentioned species is not what was there be plished intheonlyway it can be, namely, fore,but somethingcompletely different; and by divine power. not just in the estimation ofChurch belief but Mysterium Fidei should have settled in reality, since once the substance or nature of the bread and wine hasbeenchanged into the matter, but it did not. Theories oftran thebodyandbloodofChrist, nothingremains signification and transfinalization have con of the bread andthe wine except for the spe tinuedto bespread by manyliturgists and cies-beneath which Christ is present whole catechists, converging in recent years with and entire in his physical reality, corporeally the encroaching Congregationalism of much present, although not in the manner in which bodies are in a place. Catholic worship which tends to view the liturgy as essentially an action ofthe wor The intrinsic difficulties with theories shiping communityand no more than that. oftransignification and transfinalization Often ofcourse the versions ofthese the as applied to the Eucharist are at least two.
Recommended publications
  • 'It Is Bread and It Is Christ's Body Too': Presence and Sacrifice in The
    ‘It is Bread and it is Christ’s Body Too’: Presence and Sacrifice in the Eucharistic Theology of Jeremy Taylor Paul Andrew Barlow PhD, MA, BSc, PGCE A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dublin City University Supervisor: Dr Joseph Rivera School of Theology, Philosophy and Music July 2019 ii I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy is entirely my own work, and that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ID No.:15212014 Date: 15th July 2019 iii iv And yet if men would but do reason, there were in all religion no article which might more easily excuse us from meddling with questions about it than this of the holy sacrament. For as the man in Phaedrus that being asked what he carried hidden under his cloak, answered, it was hidden under his cloak; meaning that he would not have hidden it but that he intended it should be secret; so we may say in this mystery to them that curiously ask what or how it is, mysterium est, ‘it is a sacrament and a mystery;’ by sensible instruments it consigns spiritual graces, by the creatures it brings us to God, by the body it ministers to the Spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation Is Perhaps the Most Well Received Teaching When It Comes to the Application of Greek Philosophy
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2010 The aC tholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation: An Exposition and Defense Pat Selwood Bucknell University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Selwood, Pat, "The aC tholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation: An Exposition and Defense" (2010). Honors Theses. 11. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/11 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My deepest appreciation and gratitude goes out to those people who have given their support to the completion of this thesis and my undergraduate degree on the whole. To my close friends, Carolyn, Joseph and Andrew, for their great friendship and encouragement. To my advisor Professor Paul Macdonald, for his direction, and the unyielding passion and spirit that he brings to teaching. To the Heights, for the guidance and inspiration they have brought to my faith: Crescite . And lastly, to my parents, whose love, support, and sacrifice have given me every opportunity to follow my dreams. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………..………………………………………………1 Preface: Explanation of Terms………………...………………………………………......5 Chapter One: Historical Analysis of the Doctrine…………………………………...……9
    [Show full text]
  • The Active Role of Christ and the Holy Spirit in the Sanctification of the Eucharistic Elements Edward J
    Theological Studies 45(1984) THE ACTIVE ROLE OF CHRIST AND THE HOLY SPIRIT IN THE SANCTIFICATION OF THE EUCHARISTIC ELEMENTS EDWARD J. KILMARTIN, S.J. University of Notre Dame URING THE LAST two decades several bilateral ecumenical commis­ D sions of Christian churches have issued agreed statements on the subject of the Eucharist. In general they display a striking conformity in the way they speak about how Christ's sacramental presence is realized. In this essay all examples derive from commissions which have Roman Catholic participants and, in individual cases, representatives of the Anglican, Lutheran, Orthodox, or Reformed traditions. Besides the pas­ sages quoted from bilateral commission documents, relevant sections of the Faith and Order Commission's "Lima text" of 1982 are included. This document is the product of the collaboration of representatives of nearly all major Christian denominations along with the five churches mentioned above. The content of these texts is analyzed and compared with the tradi­ tional theologies of these churches. At least superficially, the way of describing the sanctification of the Eucharistie elements corresponds to the language and theological viewpoint of the Orthodox and Reformed Churches. It is less at home with the Anglo-Catholic, Lutheran, and Roman Catholic traditional theologies. This raises the question about the extent to which an ecumenical agreement has actually been attained, particularly between Orthodox and Roman Catholic theologies; for if the latter theologians can use the same language as the Orthodox and, in turn, do accept the same concept of essential change of bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ as the Orthodox, it would seem that full agreement on the theology of the sanctification of bread and wine is in sight.
    [Show full text]
  • Mysterium Fidei the Eucharist, the Church, and Vatican II Paul Mcpartlan
    Mysterium Fidei The Eucharist, the Church, and Vatican II Paul McPartlan It is a great pleasure to address this 2015 National Meeting of Diocesan Liturgical Commissions, and I am very grateful for the kind invitation. The overall theme this year is ‘The Church at Prayer: Faith Received, Fostered and Formed,’ and I am particularly delighted to have been asked to reflect with you on the relationship between the Eucharist and the Church. As we know, all of the Church’s prayer centers on the Eucharist. This weekly, and even daily, celebration is, indeed, the focal point of the Church’s life, the place where the Church is regularly renewed, re-forged, we might even say. We can see this from many angles. The Church is the body of Christ, as St Paul teaches, and in the Eucharist we receive the body of Christ. St Augustine invited the early Christians to reflect on the significance of St Paul’s words to the Corinthians: ‘Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread’ (1Cor 10:17) — one bread, one body. If you are the body of Christ, he said, then it is your mystery that is there on the Lord’s table and that you receive. You hear it said, ‘The Body of Christ,’ and you reply ‘Amen’; well then, ‘be a member of the body of Christ,’ he said, ‘in order to make that Amen true.’ ‘Be what you see, and receive what you are.’1 Receive what you are: famous and wonderful words! If, in the Eucharist, we receive what we are, then this surely is the celebration by which the Church lives; the Eucharist is the Church’s lifeline.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eucharist: a Short Commentary on Some New Trends
    THE EUCHARIST: A SHORT COMMENTARY ON SOME NEW TRENDS INTRODUCTION THE importance of the Eucharist in both Catholic Theology and liturgi­ cal piety needs no new stressing. This importance, maybe, together with the special dignity which has always been ascribed to this most holy Sacrament, may easily inspire an amount of unwholesome timidity in the believer who hears about new controversies, new viewpoints, or new interpretations which lead to substitute new words for the time­ hallowed term: transubstantiation. To allay similar suspicions I intended to publish a translation of Fr. E. Schillebeeckx' s article: 'Transubstantiation, Transignification and Transfinalisation'. Unfortunately Fr. Schillibeeckx could not allow the public ation of the translation of his article because that article no longer represents his views on transubstantiation or on the Eucharist in gene­ ral. However, one feels that our local clergy, who read with pleasure Melita Theologica and Pastor, should be given some sort of introduction to this difficult subject in, at least, one of the Reviews which they consider their own. CONTROVERSIES HAVE ALWAYS EXISTED AND WILL ALWAYS BE It is important to note that controversies, even about the most im­ portant points of our belief, have always existed in the Church. There were various opinions on the Eucharist before Trent. And although the definitions of that Council have limited the scope of these controver­ sies, still, many points relating to the Eucharistic dogmas have been left open. One may recall such debated items as the 'activity' of the accidents after transubstantiation has taken place. Should this activity be explain­ ed by recurring to an atomistic or to a dynamistic theory? Again one may refer to the distinction between the annihilation theory and the conversion theory when speaking about the outgoing substance of the bread and the wine.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Liturgy
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/christianliturgy255bald B m hVhVhh '* ^hhI I Bhh^hhI _ ??**$£» I HHfl HH 1 lii I KmsHi 1 nHHHHLHHHHHHi 1 u^Sffl H . 1 1 I D I HI H Wmm H_ KfSkIIseh HI :'"SPl .' - ^HRHHBLH^HH^^H $£§g bb ^Bfl_ *awfi&£&&At>Xl^rovSrolBHHLW&ft HH HI r^Bt-z^raB HHB r mm BhhI I - - I fta I «&*§«* b Bl HHH M%f££aH &H HHH BH^HRVHY ffiSfr'tr^tiM H HHl m$M mm HHH I Bl HB ,-»' HHH ^B -^-v* i g-Sg H &S&S Hi • B I HH HI ^StfB bT HHBHHHH HDP las HH" HH UHHlHHHHHHIv |^BBhVV'"^ tR££HK i Bl NEK-L LIBRARY STON COLLEGE in the Spirituality of Jesuits Christian Liturgv&>/ An Annotated Bibliography for Jesuits John E Baldovin, S. J. 25/5 November 1993 Christian Liturgy An Annotated Bibliography for Jesuits John F. Baldovin, SJ. Studies in the Spirituality of Jesuits 25/5 : November 1993 For your information . Jesuits write. That is obvious from Studies itself and from excellent bibliographies, such as the present issue. The first printed work by a Jesuit, of course, was St. Ignatius' s Spiritual Exercises, published in 1548. But beyond that, as early as 1553, the Directory for Confessors, of which Juan Polanco was the principal author, appeared in print. The next year, 1554, On the Frequent Reception of the Most Blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist appeared, of which Cristobal de Madrid was the principal author. It was the first book ever published with the explicit intention of urging fre- quent Communion.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies
    An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies Edited by Orlando O. Espín and James B. Nickoloff A Michael Glazier Book LITURGICAL PRESS Collegeville, Minnesota www.litpress.org A Michael Glazier Book published by Liturgical Press. Cover design by David Manahan, o.s.b. Cover symbol by Frank Kacmarcik, obl.s.b. © 2007 by Order of Saint Benedict, Collegeville, Minnesota. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, microfilm, microfiche, mechanical recording, photocopying, translation, or by any other means, known or yet unknown, for any purpose except brief quotations in reviews, without the previous written permission of Liturgical Press, Saint John’s Abbey, P.O. Box 7500, Collegeville, Minnesota 56321-7500. Printed in the United States of America. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data An introductory dictionary of theology and religious studies / edited by Orlando O. Espín and James B. Nickoloff. p. cm. “A Michael Glazier book.” ISBN-13: 978-0-8146-5856-7 (alk. paper) 1. Religion—Dictionaries. 2. Religions—Dictionaries. I. Espín, Orlando O. II. Nickoloff, James B. BL31.I68 2007 200.3—dc22 2007030890 We dedicate this dictionary to Ricardo and Robert, for their constant support over many years. Contents List of Entries ix Introduction and Acknowledgments xxxi Entries 1 Contributors 1519 vii List of Entries AARON “AD LIMINA” VISITS ALBIGENSIANS ABBA ADONAI ALBRIGHT, WILLIAM FOXWELL ABBASIDS ADOPTIONISM
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial Day Homily - 2019
    MEMORIAL DAY HOMILY - 2019 Recently we celebrated first communion with all the kids in second grade and I spoke to them about the Eucharist. If you ask a theologian what the Eucharist is all about, he or she will tell you it is the pre-eminent sacrament because it not only gives grace, it is the author of grace himself - our Lord and Savior, Jesus. They will tell you that the Eucharist is an outward sign instituted by Jesus - and lest they be misunderstood about the real presence when they use the word "sign" they will go on to talk to us about transubstantiation and how that is different from con-substantiation, or impanation, or transignification and on and on it goes. Obviously, that is not the way to talk to children... I tell the children that the Eucharist is a miracle that Jesus gives us. It is his body and blood and when we eat the consecrated bread and drink the consecrated wine, we become one with him...what an awesome miracle. Then I ask the children why Jesus did this. Jesus himself gives us the answer at every Mass. After the priest consecrates the bread and wine, he holds up the chalice and on behalf of Jesus, he gives us the reason, he says, "Do this in memory of Me". In effect, Jesus was saying to his friends, “I need to be remembered by you. There is much you do not yet understand, but understand this, I need you to remember.” Remember what? Remember that there is no greater love, than laying down one’s life for others.
    [Show full text]
  • Eucharistic Presence: an Invitation to Dialogue
    Theological Studies 60 (1999) EUCHARISTIC PRESENCE: AN INVITATION TO DIALOGUE JOHN H. MCKENNA, CM. [The author sets the context for discussing eucharistie presence by examining our understanding of symbols, Christ's Resurrection, his living among us through grace, and how Christian attitudes toward celebrating the Eucharist changed over the centuries. He gives a historical overview of theories of eucharistie presence with the mod- ern critique of transubstantiation, and an analysis of an alternate approach using a personal analogy. He also examines various post­ modern positions to promote ecumenical dialogue.] N THE INTRODUCTION to his book The Eucharist, Schillebeeckx apolo­ I gized for dealing exclusively with the topic of eucharistie or real pres­ ence.1 Self-limitation, however, is useful and necessary at times. I feel under a similar constraint in this article, which also concentrates on the question of eucharistie presence.2 My purpose will be to help provide a basis for ecumenical dialogue. I am also convinced that the way we view eucharistie presence has implications for our understanding of the Eucha­ rist and sacrifice. First, I shall briefly place the topic in the context of other crucial theo­ logical and historical questions that lie at the heart of the discussion of eucharistie presence.3 Then I shall give an overview of ways in which eucharistie presence has been understood in the course of Christian history, including transubstantiation. Finally, I shall discuss another model by which some theologians are attempting to understand the Eucharist, the model of interpersonal encounter. JOHN H. MCKENNA is a Vincentian priest who received his S.T.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacrament and Sacrifice: a Report from the Lutheran
    Lutheran Church of Australia and Roman Catholic Church Conversations 1985 Sacrament and Sacrifice Foreword This report is the result of an intensive study and discussion of thec Eucharist over a number of years by representatives of the Roman Catholi Church and the Lutheran Church of Australia meeting in dialogue. The dialogue committees, working under the mandate of their respective churches at the national level took seriously the need to conduct their discussions in the light of the authentic witness of the Holy Scriptures and with the testimony of the historic confessions of the Church constantly in mind. However, particiants also took into account the development of tradition within the dialoguing churches. These principles furnished the general guidelines for these discussions. The attempt to arrive at mutual understanding of the teachings of the respective churches on the Eucharist called for in-depth study, particularly of Christ's presence in the Sacrament and of Christ’s sacrifice in the context of the Eucharist. By responding to positioni papers which took up the key themes and issues involved, the dialoguing group strove to produce a statement which would be true to the faith of the partners involved in the dialogue, represent an acceptable expression of that faith and yet, at the same time, explore fresh avenues which would offer the hope of reaching deeper understanding and engendering further fruitful discussion. It is with praise to God that we present this report, thankful for his blessing on our discussions and the measure of understanding we have been able to reach. Sacrament and Sacrifice is offered as a report to the two churches from the dialoguing teams in the hope that it will lead to further study and discussion in the two communions.
    [Show full text]
  • Keith G. Jones, a Shared Meal and a Common Table. Some Relfections
    THE WHITLEY LECTURE 1999 A SHARED MEAL AND A COMMON TABLE Some reflections on the Lord's Supper and Baptists Keith G. Jones Whitley Publications THE WHITLEY LECTURE 1999 A SHARED MEAL AND A COMMON TABLE Some renections on the Lord's Supper and Baptists Keith G. Jones Whitley Publications The Author and Whitley Publications 1999 ISBN 0-9528150-4-4 All rights reseaved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. Whitley Publications c/o Regent's Park College Pusey Street Oxford OXI 2LB England 3 The Whitley Lecture The Whitley Lectureship was first established in 1949, in honour of W.T. Whitley (1861-1947), arguably the first systematic modern Baptist historian. Whitley was a notable scholar and servant of the Church of Christ. He had pastorates in England and Australia. He served the denomination in both countries in many ways, including pursuing historical studies. Whitley was a key figure in the formation of the Baptist Historical Society (1908). He edited its journal which soon gained an international reputation for the quality of its contents. Altogether he made a particularly remarkable contribution to Baptist life and self-understanding, providing an inspiring model of how a pastor scholar might enrich the life and faith of others. The establishment of the Lectureship in his name was intended to be an encouragement to research by Baptist scholars into aspects of Christian life and thought and to enable the results of such research to be published and available to the denomination and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Wesley Biddy
    Wesley Scott Biddy “Towards an Ecumenical Understanding of the Eucharist: A Proposal for Pentecostals” A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Theology degree Duke Divinity School, 2005 Thesis Advisor: ___________________ Second Reader: ___________________ Th.M. Director: ___________________ Towards an Ecumenical Understanding of the Eucharist: A Proposal for Pentecostals Introduction Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen devotes a chapter of his Introduction to Ecclesiology to exploring a distinctively Pentecostal approach to ecclesiology, and it is telling that he begins by asking about such an approach, “Is there any?”1 The question is quite justified, echoing the questions posed by Paul D. Lee in light of Pentecostalism’s history: If Pentecostalism is a movement, is it useful or valid to talk about ecclesiology at all? What does ecclesiology mean to a Pentecostal? At first, Pentecostals were so busy spreading the “good news” of the fresh outpouring of the Spirit “in the last days” that they became unconcerned about forming a denomination. The premillenial urgency of the imminent Kingdom made Pentecostals focus on their readiness, through personal conversion and regeneration, thereby rendering any ecclesiological deliberation rather irrelevant or at least secondary.2 Indeed, the influence of this early strong eschatological bent—which has by no means completely dissolved over the movement’s continued life span, but persists as a quickening element in much of its common piety—likely helps to account for a relative dearth of doctrinal, philosophical, or systematic theological reflection that has characterized Pentecostalism historically. Of course, recent decades have seen this trend changing, to be sure. Nevertheless, when we come to consider Pentecostal sacramentology, the question, “Is there any?” could be asked with as much justification as in the case of ecclesiology, of which sacramentology is a part.
    [Show full text]