Sable Antelope (Hippotragus Niger)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sable Antelope (Hippotragus Niger) Sable Antelope (Hippotragus Niger) Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Artiodactyla Family: Bovidae WHAT IT IS The name "sable" refers to the black color of the male's coat. Males are about 9 feet long with a shoulder height of 4 feet. The male weighs about 500 pounds and is 20 percent larger than the female. The male's coat is dark brown to black with white under parts, while the female and young males have rich russet coats. Both males and females have stout, scythe-like ringed horns that grow to a length of 20-60 inches and both have stiff manes. Sable antelopes have large ears, large eyes and a keen sense of hearing, vision and smell. WHERE IT LIVES Southern Savanna, from southeastern Kenya, eastern Tanzania, and Mozambique to Angola and southern Zaire, mainly in the Miombo Woodland Zone. The giant sable, isolated and vulnerable in central Angola, is one of the most endangered antelopes. ECOLOGY Preferred habitat combines savanna woodland and grassland; trees (fire- resistant, broad-leafed, and deciduous) widely spaced with understory of sparse grasses utilized in rainy season. Drainage-line and floodplain grasslands that produce new growth after the annual fires keep sable in open during dry season. A grazer/browser eats grasses supplemented by foliage and herbs, especially kinds growing on woodland termite mounds. Goes to water at least every other day and regularly visits salt licks (also chews bones to make up for mineral-deficient soils). ACTIVITY Traveling on average approximately 1/2mi a day, sables are especially sedentary on dry-season pastures, when herds may spend weeks on the same field, leaving only to go to water or seek shade during hottest hours. But periodically herds move several miles and resettle on another pasture. Sables also regularly graze until dark, then move off before settling down to chew the cud, a tactic that makes it harder for predators to spot a herd's resting site and sneak up after dark. SOCIAL/MATING SYSTEM Herds of 15 to 25 females and young are typical but often represent only part of the residents (typically 30-75 sables in good habitat) sharing a common, exclusive home range of 4 to 10 mi2 (10-25 km2), incorporating territories of 1.5 to 3.5 mi2 (3.9-9 km2) of up to 5 bulls or more. Some herds or subpopulations have separate dry- and wet-season ranges miles apart. The general pattern in all populations is dispersal in small groups during the rains and early dry season, and dry-season concentration in large herds on available green pastures. A female rank hierarchy based on seniority is continually reinforced by aggressive and submissive interactions. Males are subordinate to adult females until they grow bigger; by then obvious male secondary characters make them persona non grata to territorial bulls. Evicted from female society between 3 and 4 years, males live in bachelor herds until mature at 5, or stay alone, if no group is available, keeping out of the way of territorial bulls. Territorial bulls often stay alone, even when a female herd is in residence, patrolling and scent-marking or just hanging out in some shady grove. Though conspicuous in a herd of brown females and young, lone bulls standing still in a clump of trees are easily overlooked. REPRODUCTION An annual calving season at the end of the rains (except perennial in Kenya's Shimba Hills). Season extends for several months and a few calves are born as much as 6 months out of phase, Gestation 8 to 9 months. Females conceive at 2.5 years; males adolescent by then but unable to compete for territories and mating opportunities until mature. Even in territorial class, certain prime bulls dominate their neighbors. OFFSPRING AND MATERNAL CARE Mothers stay secluded for first week or so of the calf's 3-week hiding stage. Cows with calves concealed in the same locale associate in maternal herds. Calves join cohesive peer group as they outgrow the concealment stage and seek mothers only to nurse; after weaning (6-8 months), calves have still less contact. Maternal-offspring bond is so weak that even small calves may be in different sections of a divided herd for days. PREDATORS Because it is big and inhabits regions with comparatively little wildlife, sables usually have relatively few predators. Lucky for them, as laggard young are vulnerable to spotted hyenas and leopards. DIFFERENCES IN SABLE ANTELOPE BEHAVIOR TERRITORIAL ADVERTISING Scrape marks made by pawing identify deposits made by territorial sable. The only consistent difference between the dunging sites of patrolling sable and roan antelope are differences in track and pellet size. Urine-testing. All sables including calves, test urine. MALE BEHAVIOR Driving and chasing, roaring. Of sexually interested male. Foreleg-lifting used by courting male to prod lying female into getting up is behavior of persistent bull courting reluctant female. FEMALE BEHAVIOR Flight, including fear-gaping and screaming when chased hard. Mother and Offspring A Lone sable antelope emits piercing, birdlike whistles. When Separated mothers, and young search for one another..
Recommended publications
  • The Miombo Woodlands of Central, Eastern and Southern Africa
    90 The Miombo Woodlands of Central, Eastern and Southern Africa Philomena Tuite and John J. Gardiner Dept. of Crop Science, Horticulture and Forestry, University College Dublin, Belfield. Dublin 4. Summary Aspects of the environment and ecology of Miombo woodlands are described. Attention is given to the widespread nature of their distrihution area and the role played by Miombo at local and national levels. A matrix of woodland-use is presented. This offers some insight into changing resource-usc patterns in Miombo, and highlights the conflicts which may ensue with the adoption of certain woodland management strategies. Iutroduction In Africa, tropical dry forests and woodlands constitute between 70 - 80% of all forested land (Murphy & Lugo 1986). South of the Equator, (50 to 25 0 S) Miombo woodlands are the main dry for· est type in the continent, occupying an estimated area of 7 million square kilometres (Griffith 1961). Thus, Miombo represents one of the most widespread, yet compact forest types in the world. Almost 50% of the land area of both Tanzania and Zambia, and large tracts of Mozambique, Malawi, Zimbabwe, Zaire and Angola support Miombo (Fig. 1). This aereal distribution corresponds roughly to the Zambezian Floral Domain of White (1965), recognised for its floristic richness and the widespread occurrence of the tree genera Brachystegia, lulbernardia and Isoberlinia. Despite the widespread nature of this woodland type, its long history of exploitation and the increasing human·related pressure and needs within the countries mentioned, Miombo resource-use re­ mains largely undocumented. The data base on inventory, silviculture, IRISH FORESTRY, 1990. Vol. 47 (2)' 90·107 THE MIOMBO WOODLANDS 91 • I _.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Biology and Controlling International Status of the African Wild Trade in Endangered Dog, Lycaon Pictus Species
    U PDATE IncludingEndangered a Reprint Species of theTechnical latest USFWS Bulletin School of Natural Resources and Environment August 7994 Vol. 7 7 No. 70 THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN In this Issue Conservation Biology and Controlling International Status of the African Wild Trade in Endangered Dog, Lycaon pictus Species Resilience and Resistance: Old Growth Forests and the Relevance for Conservation Puerto Rican Parrot Biology and Management Conservation Biology and Status of the African wild dog, Lycaon pictus by - Joshua R, Ginsberg - The African wild dog (Lycaon Causes of Decline Loss of habitat and direct persecu- pictus) was once found from Senegal to tion by humans were probably respon- South Africa. Inhabiting a wide range of A number of explanations and hy- sible for initial declines and local extinc- ecosystems, from deserts to the alpine potheses have been invoked to explain tions. Morerecently, other factors which meadows of Mount Kilimanjaro (re- the pan-African decline in Lycaon num- may have led to local or regional de- viewed in Fanshawe et al. 1991 ; Ginsberg bers (Fanshawe et al. 1991). Wild dogs clines in numbers include competition andMacdonald 1990),Lycaon wasprob- occur at low densities relative to other with other carnivores (Frame 1986; ably found in all environments except large predators. For example, while Sinclair, in press); direct conflict with true rainforests. Well over a hundred lions frequently occur at densities of one humans (Childes 1988; Hines 1990; thousand wild dogs, or five times that lion per five square kilometers (Schaller Malcolm 1979); disease (Creel et al., in many, may have lived in Africa at the 1972), wild dog densities average one press; Burrows et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Zambian Sable: Are They a Geographic Extension of the Giant Sable Antelope?
    View metadata, citation and similarWestern papers at core.ac.uk Zambian sable: Are they a brought to you by CORE geographic extension of theprovided by Stellenbosch University SUNScholar Repository giant sable antelope? Bettine Jansen van Vuuren1,2*, Terence J. Robinson1, Pedro VazPinto3, Richard Estes4 & Conrad A. Matthee1 1Evolutionary Genomics Group, Department Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa 2Centre for Invasion Biology, Department Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa 3Universidade Catolica de Angola, Rua Nossa Senhora da Muxima, 29 Luanda, Angola 45 Granite Street, Peterborough, NH 03458, U.S.A. Received 5 September 2008. Accepted 21 January 2010 The giant sable (Hippotragus niger variani ) is one of Africa’s most spectacular large antelope. Years of civil unrest in Angola, a highly localized distribution and interbreeding with its congener the roan antelope (H. equinus) has led to this subspecies being considered as critically endangered. Sable antelope occurring ~600 km to the east in western Zambia superficially resemble giant sable in phenotype, prompting speculation in the popular media that the distribution of giant sable may be larger than currently documented. Our aim here was to investigate the evolutionary placement of western Zambian sable using mitochon- drial DNA control region data. Phylogenetic analyses (maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses) supported the monophyly of H. n. variani (Bayesian posterior probability of >0.95, bootstrap support >80%) and nested the western Zambian sable within H. n. niger. This find- ing was supported by an analysis of molecular variance that discretely grouped western F Zambian sable from giant sable ( ST = 0.645, P = 0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • Hippotragus Equinus – Roan Antelope
    Hippotragus equinus – Roan Antelope authorities as there may be no significant genetic differences between the two. Many of the Roan Antelope in South Africa are H. e. cottoni or equinus x cottoni (especially on private properties). Assessment Rationale This charismatic antelope exists at low density within the assessment region, occurring in savannah woodlands and grasslands. Currently (2013–2014), there are an observed 333 individuals (210–233 mature) existing on nine formally protected areas within the natural distribution range. Adding privately protected subpopulations and an Cliff & Suretha Dorse estimated 0.8–5% of individuals on wildlife ranches that may be considered wild and free-roaming, yields a total mature population of 218–294 individuals. Most private Regional Red List status (2016) Endangered subpopulations are intensively bred and/or kept in camps C2a(i)+D*†‡ to exclude predators and to facilitate healthcare. Field National Red List status (2004) Vulnerable D1 surveys are required to identify potentially eligible subpopulations that can be included in this assessment. Reasons for change Non-genuine: While there was an historical crash in Kruger National Park New information (KNP) of 90% between 1986 and 1993, the subpopulation Global Red List status (2008) Least Concern has since stabilised at c. 50 individuals. Overall, over the past three generations (1990–2015), based on available TOPS listing (NEMBA) Vulnerable data for nine formally protected areas, there has been a CITES listing None net population reduction of c. 23%, which indicates an ongoing decline but not as severe as the historical Endemic Edge of Range reduction. Further long-term data are needed to more *Watch-list Data †Watch-list Threat ‡Conservation Dependent accurately estimate the national population trend.
    [Show full text]
  • EAZA Antelope & Giraffe
    EAZA Antelope & Giraffe TAG Introduction & report on some activities Joint TAG chairs meeting 2016, Omaha Dr. Jens-Ove Heckel Zoo Landau in der Pfalz, Germany EAZA Antelope & Giraffe TAG chair [email protected] EAZA Antelope & Giraffe TAG • Antelope & Giraffe TAG continues as one of the largest and most complex TAGs representing 50 species (and approximately 90 taxa) in EAZA zoos • our remit: try to retain as many species as possible in healthy populations in EAZA collections • currently the TAG holds 11 EEPs and 11 ESBs; 4 species are part of ISBs; the remaining species are monitored (Mon-P, Mon-TAG). Chair Jens-Ove Heckel Landau Vice chair Sander Hofman Antwerp Vice chair (till 11.2015) Tania Gilbert Marwell Vice chair (since 12.2015) Kim Skalborg Simonsen Givskud Sub-group Okapi & Giraffe SG Sander Hofman Antwerp Sub-group Woodland antelope SG Kim Skalborg Simonsen Givskud Sub-group Savannah antelope SG Catrin Hammer Goerlitz Sub-group Aridlands antelope SG Ian Goodwin Marwell (Sub-group) (Mini antelope SG) (Klaus Müller-Schilling) (Hanover) Studbook keepers/Program managers EAZA Antelope & Giraffe TAG meeting 2015, Wroclaw Coordinator Conservation Tania Gilbert Marwell Coordinator Research Eulalia Moreno Almeria Advisor Veterinary Sven Hammer Goerlitz Advisor Genetics Rob Ogden Edinburgh Advisor Population management Laurie Bingaman Lackey USA Advisor Nutrition Marcus Clauss Zuerich Advisor Husbandry n.n. Advisor Education n.n. Regular support and advice also provided by: Exec. Coordinator - Collect. Coordin. & Conserv. Merel Zimmermann EPMAG / Population Management Kristin Leus Population Biologist - Collect. Coordin. & Conserv. Kristine Schad Good links to: IUCN SSC Antelope SG, IUCN Giraffe & Okapi SG/Giraffe Conservation Fdn., other EAZA Ungulate TAGs, BIAZA Hoof stock focus group, AZA Antelope & Giraffe TAG, Sahara Conservation Fund/SSIG etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals of Africa
    Silver 49 Bronze 26 Gold 59 Copper 17 Animals of Africa _______________________________________________Diamond 80 PYGMY ANTELOPES Klipspringer Common oribi Haggard oribi Gold 59 Bronze 26 Silver 49 Copper 17 Bronze 26 Silver 49 Gold 61 Copper 17 Diamond 80 Diamond 80 Steenbok 1 234 5 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Cape grysbok BIG CATS LECHWE, KOB, PUKU Sharpe grysbok African lion 1 2 2 2 Common lechwe Livingstone suni African leopard***** Kafue Flats lechwe East African suni African cheetah***** _______________________________________________ Red lechwe Royal antelope SMALL CATS & AFRICAN CIVET Black lechwe Bates pygmy antelope Serval Nile lechwe 1 1 2 2 4 _______________________________________________ Caracal 2 White-eared kob DIK-DIKS African wild cat Uganda kob Salt dik-dik African golden cat CentralAfrican kob Harar dik-dik 1 2 2 African civet _______________________________________________ Western kob (Buffon) Guenther dik-dik HYENAS Puku Kirk dik-dik Spotted hyena 1 1 1 _______________________________________________ Damara dik-dik REEDBUCKS & RHEBOK Brown hyena Phillips dik-dik Common reedbuck _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________African striped hyena Eastern bohor reedbuck BUSH DUIKERS THICK-SKINNED GAME Abyssinian bohor reedbuck Southern bush duiker _______________________________________________African elephant 1 1 1 Sudan bohor reedbuck Angolan bush duiker (closed) 1 122 2 Black rhinoceros** *** Nigerian
    [Show full text]
  • Using Natural Fertilizers in Miombo Woodlands by Emmanuel Chidumayo
    ISSUES 'IN AFRICAN BIODIVERSITY THE BIODIVERSITY SUPPORT PROGRAM IYwmber 2, May 1999 Using Natural Fertilizers in Miombo Woodlands By Emmanuel Chidumayo Introduction Miombo woodlands grow on the ancient central African plateau and its escarpments. They form a swathe across the continent from Angola to Mozambique, and extend from lhnzania and southern Congo in the north, to Zimbabwe in the south. Scientists distin- guish miombo from other savanna woodland and forest formations by the presence of legume trees belonging to the genera Brachustegia, Julbernardia, and Isoberlinia. The climate in the miombo zone is subhumid, characterized by a short seasonal rainfall rang- ing from 650 mm to 1,400 mm, occurring from November to March, and a long dry sea- son (April to October/November). Miombo is divided with the wetter type (with > 1,000 mm of rainfall) occurring in the north, and drier type (with < 1,000 mm) (White 1983) occurring in the south of the miombo zone. Miombo occurs on geologically old and acidic (pH 4-6) soils with low fertility. A charac- teristic association between miombo tree species and ectomycorrhizal fungi significantly increases mineral uptake from the soil. There is higher species diversity in miombo woodlands and associated wetlands or dambos than, for example, acacia woodlands. Miombo is of outstanding international importance for the conservation of plants and birds, many of whichare endemic to the region. It provides seasonal habitat for two large, spectacular antelope in Africa, the roan and sable. Miombo trees are typically highly resilient to the annual fires that sweep across the region, and resprout rapidly after anthropogenic disturbance; however, woodland regeneration can be stalled or prevented if trees are uprooted and the connection with ectomycorrhiza is disturbed.
    [Show full text]
  • Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report
    MIOMBO ECOREGION VISION REPORT Jonathan Timberlake & Emmanuel Chidumayo December 2001 (published 2011) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 20 WWF - SARPO MIOMBO ECOREGION VISION REPORT 2001 (revised August 2011) by Jonathan Timberlake & Emmanuel Chidumayo Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 20 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P.O. Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe PREFACE The Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report was commissioned in 2001 by the Southern Africa Regional Programme Office of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF SARPO). It represented the culmination of an ecoregion reconnaissance process led by Bruce Byers (see Byers 2001a, 2001b), followed by an ecoregion-scale mapping process of taxa and areas of interest or importance for various ecological and bio-physical parameters. The report was then used as a basis for more detailed discussions during a series of national workshops held across the region in the early part of 2002. The main purpose of the reconnaissance and visioning process was to initially outline the bio-physical extent and properties of the so-called Miombo Ecoregion (in practice, a collection of smaller previously described ecoregions), to identify the main areas of potential conservation interest and to identify appropriate activities and areas for conservation action. The outline and some features of the Miombo Ecoregion (later termed the Miombo– Mopane Ecoregion by Conservation International, or the Miombo–Mopane Woodlands and Grasslands) are often mentioned (e.g. Burgess et al. 2004). However, apart from two booklets (WWF SARPO 2001, 2003), few details or justifications are publically available, although a modified outline can be found in Frost, Timberlake & Chidumayo (2002). Over the years numerous requests have been made to use and refer to the original document and maps, which had only very restricted distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Eland
    Tragelaphus oryx – Common Eland recognised, though their validity has been in dispute (Thouless 2013): Tragelaphus o. livingstonii (Sclater 1864; Livingstone's Eland): also called kaufmanni, niediecki, selousi and triangularis. It is found in the Central Zambezian Miombo woodlands i.e. south- central Africa (Angola, Zambia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Malawi). Livingstone's Eland has a brown pelt with up to twelve stripes. Tragelaphus o. oryx (Pallas 1766; Cape Eland): also called alces, barbatus, canna and oreas. This subspecies is found south of the Zambezi river (South Africa, Botswana and Namibia). The fur is tawny, and adults lose their stripes. Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern Tragelaphus o. pattersonianus (Lydekker 1906; East National Red List status (2004) Least Concern African Eland or Patterson's Eland): also called Reasons for change No change billingae. It is found in east Africa extending into the Somali arid areas, hence its common name. Its coat Global Red List status (2008) Least concern can have up to 12 stripes. TOPS listing (NEMBA) None Tragelaphus o. oryx occurs throughout the larger part of South Africa, but the far northern Limpopo Province CITES listing None bordering Zimbabwe is regarded as a transitional zone Endemic No between T. o. oryx and T. o. livingstonii or an area where they overlap. This argues the case that they should rather During drought conditions Eland roam extensively be described as ecotypes (in ecotypes, it is common for in order to meet forage and water requirements; in continuous, gradual geographic variation to impose the southern Kalahari during abnormally dry analogous phenotypic and/or genetic variation; this conditions, Eland were found to cover more than situation is called cline.).
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of Roan Antelope Project
    Roan Antelope Project Roan Antelope (Hippotragus equines) are Africa’s second largest antelope after the eland. Historically they were widely distributed in small herds over a large part of Swaziland. They became locally extinct when Swaziland’s very last free­ranging roan antelope was poached at Maphiveni in 1961. Roan have become extremely rare across their entire natural range. The reason for their demise is probably a combination of factors which include poaching, diminishing range, stress­induced disease, predation, and competition by high density species. A small group of 4 roan (3 females, 1 bull) reintroduced to Mkhaya from Namibia perished because, we now believe, the animals were naïve to tick­borne diseases in a densely tick hostile environment where mortalities overwhelmed recruitment. It is likely that the tick­borne Theileria hippotragi disease played a large role. Theileria is a protozoal disease which is fatal to roan and sable antelope. The expertise of Dr Johan Steyl under the supervision of Prof. Leon Prozesky of the Onderstepoort Veterinary Faculty of the University of Pretoria has helped enormously with this project. The vector is the red­legged tick Rhipicephalus evertsi, which is abundant in Swaziland, but little was known about its impact on wildlife at the time of the Namibian introduction. Our Roan Antelope project got underway in 2002 after Dr Hamish Currie, founder and chief executive of Back to Africa, very generously committed to assist in restoring a viable population of roan antelope to Swaziland. Dr Hamish Currie wisely harnessed the expertise of Dr Johan Steyl whose guidance has without doubt been pivotal to the success of the project so far.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    Coordinated by: Francisco Mabjaia, Permanent Secretary, for the Coordination of Environmental Affairs (MICOA) and Felicidade Munguambe, National Biodiversity Programme Coordinator, (MICOA) Edited by: John (IMPACT0 Lda.) and Felicidade Munguambe (MICOA) With contributions from: Arlito Cuco (National Directorate of Forestry and Wildlife DNFFB); Calane da Silva (National Herbarium); Paulino Munisse (National Herbarium); Dulcinea Baquete (MICOA) Alfonso (DNFFB); Carlos (Natural History Museum); Helena Motta (MICOA); (MICOA); Hermes Pacule (Fisheries Research Institute); (Department of Biological Sciences, Eduardo Mondlane University, EMU); and John (IMPACT0 Lda.) Diagrams: Viriato Chiconele (Department of Biological Science, EMU) Published by: IMPACT0 This publication was made possible by the financial support of the Global Environmental Facility and the United Nations Environmental Programme Ministry for the Coordination of Environmental Affairs, Mozambique, 1997 EXECUTIVESUMMARY The National on the Conservation Marromeu complex, the Chimanimani of Biological Diversity in Mozambique has and the Maputaland Centre of been prepared in accordance with Article 26 Endemism, of the Convention of which Parties to prepare periodic Since the signing of the Peace Accord in reports measures taken to implement 1992 and the consolidation of peace CBD provisions and fhe effectiveness of the country new and challenging such measures. The Report covers opportunities now exist for na resource implementation activities carried out scientists gather primary
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary Species Project
    TRANSBOUNDARY SPECIES PROJECT ROAN, SABLE AND TSESSEBE Rowan B. Martin Species Report for Roan, Sable and Tsessebe in support of The Transboundary Mammal Project of the Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Namibia facilitated by The Namibia Nature Foundation and World Wildlife Fund Living in a Finite Environment (LIFE) Programme Cover picture adapted from the illustrations by Clare Abbott in The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion by Reay H.N. Smithers Published by the University of Pretoria Republic of South Africa 1983 Transboundary Species Project – Background Study Roan, Sable and Tsessebe CONTENTS 1. BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ...................................... 1 a. Taxonomy ..................................................... 1 b. Physical description .............................................. 3 c. Habitat ....................................................... 6 d. Reproduction and Population Dynamics ............................. 12 e. Distribution ................................................... 14 f. Numbers ..................................................... 24 g. Behaviour .................................................... 38 h. Limiting Factors ............................................... 40 2. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE THREE SPECIES ........................... 43 a. Conservation Significance ........................................ 43 b. Economic Significance ........................................... 44 3. STAKEHOLDING ................................................. 48 a. Stakeholders .................................................
    [Show full text]