2019 Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
I Have Been Working on a Book, Stand-Ins, on The
Workshop Participants: I have been working on a book, Stand-Ins, on the causes and consequences of temporary leadership in government, business, and religion, which is aimed at a more general audience. Given recent events, I have returned to more traditional scholarship to explore some of the issues involving temporary leadership (and the lack thereof) in federal agencies, among other topics. This paper is brand new, incomplete, and unpolished. Given its length, I would recommend reading the Introduction (pp.1-5), Scope of Actings (pp.13-27), and Statutory Questions (pp.33-42). I look forward to your reactions and suggestions for improvement. AJO Actings Anne Joseph O’Connell Stanford Law School April 1, 2019 Please do not cite or distribute beyond the workshop without permission. I. Introduction Stand-in leaders do not usually command much attention. They step up in moments of need to keep organizations running. The stereotypical interim leader is therefore a caretaker—in place to maintain stability; not to implement major changes. But not all interim leaders are caretakers. Some are auditioning for the permanent job. And a few are there to shake up the organization—so-called “fixers”. The scope of temporary leadership is vast—after all, traditional leaders are transitory, and selection procedures for more permanent leaders take time. On the public side, there are interim leaders in all branches of the federal government. In Congress, there are appointed senators, chosen by their state’s governor to fill in for an elected senator who has died or resigned, perhaps in disgrace or perhaps to take a different job. -
American Enterprise in the 19Th Century
ANTH318 Nautical Archaeology of the Americas Class 24 th American Enterprise in the 19 Century Introduction During the 1800s, millions of Europeans made the New World their new homeland, and brought the technological revolution going on in Europe to America. In the beginning of the century, immigrants sailed in wooden ships that would take from 4 to 12 weeks to cover the distance between the two continents. By the end of the century, there were regular packet lines, and immense steam ships covered that distance in 5 days. Transatlantic telegraphic cables provided almost instantaneous inter-continental communications. During this time, the American merchant fleet sailed all the world's seas in search of new markets and products. Importing pepper, tea, silk, coffee, porcelain, fur, leather, wood, ivory, spices, iron, textiles, gum copal, and slaves, and exporting fish, lumber, textiles and leather goods, American ships crossed all the seas and helped to complete mapping the planet. The New England whaling fleet discovered more than 400 islands in the Pacific Ocean. Centered in New England in the beginning of the century, the American shipbuilding industry gained such a fine reputation that ships would be purchased with their cargo in foreign ports. Coastal trade During the 18th century, the coastal trade was carried on by sloops, ketches, and small square-rigged vessels. In the 19th century this trade, and some of the long sea trade, would be carried on two- masted schooners. The fore-and-aft rig was more weatherly, allowing better sailing angles into the wind, and required smaller crews since the sails were operated from the deck rather than aloft. -
2017 Annual Report Partnering for Shared Success 2017 Annual Report 2017
2017 Annual Report Partnering for shared success 2017 Annual Report 2017 Givaudan – 2016 Annual Report Givaudan at a glance Givaudan at a glance Our business in 2017 million 109Locations worldwide 46Production sites 424R&D spend 11,170Full time employees Sales in North America CHF 1,352 million Production sites 9 Employees 2,231 Annual sales in mature markets Sales in Latin America CHF 618 million % Production sites 57 6 Employees 1,471 Flavour Division We make life taste delicious Sweet% goods Beverages% Confectionery Soft drinks We are dedicated to expanding the world’s expression through Baked goods Fruit juices flavours by bringing moments of delight with delicious flavour Sugar confectionery Instant beverages and taste experiences. Our customers – global, international, Chocolate Total 54% Chewing gum regional and local – are in the food and beverage industry and of Group sales span across key segments including beverages, sweet goods, savoury, snacks and dairy. We explore the globe for ingredients, innovate to bring our customers unique propositions, and Dairy % Savoury delight millions of consumers around the world. Ice cream and yoghurt % Ready-made meals Desserts Snacks Yellow fats (margarines) www.givaudan.com – our company – about Givaudan Soups and sauces Meat and poultry Disclosure 102 – 6, 102 – 7 Givaudan – 2017 Annual Report million emissions score ‘A Sense of Tomorrow’ 19.2Hours worked safely GHGScience-based targets for 2030 CDPLeadership level A A new sustainability approach Sales in Europe, Africa and Middle East CHF 1,723 million Production sites 18 Employees 4,819 Annual sales in high growth markets Sales in Asia Pacific CHF 1,358 million Production sites 13 43% Employees 2,649 Fragrance Division We live to perfume life Fragrance% Ingredients Fine F%ragrances and Active Beauty Signature fragrances The artistry of our perfumers encompasses a myriad of scented Line extensions stories for brands everywhere. -
National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
NP8 Form 1ft*»« 10244)019 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number ___ Page ___ SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 91000563 Date Listed: 5/16/91 NIANTIC (Storeship) San Francisco CA Property Name County State N/A Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. __________________ Zh/ k l ______ L Signature of the Keeper Date of Action Amended Items in Nomination: Statement of Significance: Because so little of the property remains intact, under Applicable National Register Criteria, C is removed and under Areas of Significance, Architecture is removed. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NPS Form 10-900 OMB N&':J024 OOUTV (R«v. ft-ttfl) Li U Lfa !}j United States Department of the Interior *} f'' v: *, r rM L—xJH National Park Service .\ v; v National Register of Historic Places NATIONAL Registration Form REGISTER This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines tor Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. -
INTERIOR Energy Companies Paid Bernhardt More Than $80K Last Year
INTERIOR Energy companies paid Bernhardt more than $80K last year Corbin Hiar, E&E News reporter Published: Thursday, May 11, 2017 David Bernhardt filed documents ahead of his confirmation hearing to be Interior deputy secretary that said he will recuse himself for a year from issues involving companies he had lobbied for. Photo courtesy of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP. Interior deputy secretary nominee David Bernhardt earned at least $80,000 last year working for a host of energy and environmental interests, disclosure forms show. He agreed to recuse himself for one year from matters involving any of the companies as well as other former clients of his or his law firm, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP. The documents Bernhardt filed in order to advance through the confirmation process were signed off on earlier this week by the Interior Department's top ethics official. Bernhardt's financial disclosure report was filed with the independent Office of Government Ethics on March 6, more than a month before the White House formally nominated him for Interior's second-highest post (Greenwire, April 28). The disclosures show Bernhardt made more than $1.1 million last year from Brownstein Hyatt, where he is a partner, and a holding company of the law firm. The disclosure report lists the following clients as paying him at least $5,000 for his legal services in 2016: Targa Resources Co. LLC, Noble Energy Co. LLC, NRG Energy Inc., Sempra Energy, Lafarge North America - Western Region, Safari Club International Foundation, Active Network LLC, Statoil Gulf Services LLC, Cobalt International Energy, Rosemont Copper Co., Independent Petroleum Association of America, Taylor Energy Co. -
The People Shaping the Trump Administration
The People Shaping the Trump Administration Despite Running on a Pledge to ‘Drain the Swamp’ and Crack Down on Special Interests, Donald Trump Has Filled His Transition Team With Lobbyists and Others With Potential Conflicts November 16, 2016 – Donald Trump rode to the White House by raging about alleged rampant corruption in Washington and pledging to “drain the swamp.” Each of the five points in the ethics platform he issued in October focused on diminishing the influence of lobbyists.1 These included a promise to impose a five-year ban on former executive branch officials lobbying the federal government. Trump further promised to crack down on special interest-influence by expanding the definition of lobbyist to include consultants and others who trade on inside government information and expertise.2 But Trump’s nascent transition team, which will shape his administration, is swarming with lobbyists and other special interests. Many of the lobbyists are working for the transition on areas for which they currently are lobbying the federal government. Meanwhile, many of those who aren’t lobbyists appear to have potential conflicts of interest. Vice president-elect Mike Pence reportedly said on November 15 that the transition team would be purged of lobbyists, but the transition team has not made the point official.3 Even if true, that remedy would not address cases such as a defense contractor working on defense interests, or a lawyer for health care interests working on health care reform. Here are brief summaries of individuals who have been reported in the media as overseeing agencies or policies for Trump’s transition team. -
A Report to the President U.S
A Report to the President U.S. Department of the Interior 2017-2021 REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT 2017-2021 U.S. Department of the Interior JANUARY 15, 2021 Report to the President Report to the President U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT The Department of the Interior (Department) has focused on improving the ways we serve the American public, while moving forward with your policy priorities. In doing so, the Department has made incredible progress furthering conservation stewardship, expanding opportunities to hunt and fish on public lands, improving core administrative functions, creating a common-sense regulatory regime, and enhancing our Nation’s energy independence. On behalf of the more than 65,000 Secretary David L. Bernhardt dedicated employees who work diligently across our Nation to accomplish important missions in service to the American people, I am pleased to present the Department’s Summary of Actions Report for 2017- 2021. This report highlights the Department’s major and historic achievements toward fulfilling your vision on behalf of all Americans. David L. Bernhardt Secretary of the Interior Page 1 Report to the President PURPOSE AND INTRODUCTION Secretary Bernhardt and First Lady Melania Trump at Grand Teton National Park From the beginning days of the Trump-Pence Administration, President Donald J. Trump gave clear direction to the Department of the Interior (Department, DOI, or Interior). He set priorities and ambitious goals, challenging Federal agencies through Governmentwide Executive orders, Presidential memoranda, and other actions to deliver better results for the American people. Interior has worked relentlessly to implement the President’s agenda for the betterment of our society and economy. -
New Mexico Meadow Jumping Mouse; Final Rule, 81 Fed
Case 1:18-cv-01138-JB-JFR Document 43 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 241 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO NORTHERN NEW MEXICO STOCKMAN’S ASSOCIATION and OTERO COUNTY CATTLEMAN’S ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, vs. No. CIV 18-1138 JB\JFR UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and GREG SHEEHAN, Principal Deputy Director & Acting Director of the United States Fish & Wildlife Service, in his official capacity, Defendants, and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Intervenors. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Plaintiffs’ Opening Brief in Support of Petition for Review, filed August 8, 2019 (Doc. 26)(“Petition”); (ii) Petitioners’ Brief on Remedy, filed December 6, 2019 (Doc. 40)(“P. Remedy Brief”); (iii) Federal Respondents’ Brief on Remedy, filed December 6, 2019 (Doc. 41)(“D. Remedy Brief”); and (iv) Respondent- Intervenors’ Brief on Remedy, filed December 6, 2019 (Doc. 42)(“I. Remedy Brief”). The Court held a hearing on October 31, 2019. The primary issues are: (i) whether Plaintiffs Northern NM Stockman’s Association (“Northern NM Stockman’s Association”) and Otero Cattleman’s Association (“Otero Cattleman’s Association”)(collectively, “the Stockman’s Associations”) suffer economic injury to establish associational standing under Article III of the Constitution of the United States of America to challenge the decision made by Defendants United States Fish & Wildlife Service and its Principal Deputy director and acting director, Greg Sheehan (collectively, “Fish & Wildlife”), to designate land on which members of the Stockman’s Associations graze cattle as critical habitat designation1 (“the designation”) for the New Mexico Meadow Jumping Mouse (“Jumping Mouse”); (ii) whether Fish & Wildlife’s use of the “incremental effects” 1The Endangered Species Act requires Fish & Wildlife to designate “critical habitat” for all species that Fish & Wildlife lists as threatened or endangered. -
Urban Projects Widen Park Service Horizons
COURIER The National Park Service Newsletter Washington, D.C. Vol. 3, No. 8 July 1980 Urban projects widen Park Service horizons By Grant W. Midgley backpacking and water sports; and advancing cultural opportunities—arts, Public Affairs Office, WASO exhibits, music, plays and handicrafts. The morning fog that often The Ul covered a wide range of areas enshrouds Point Loma has lifted, and far and projects, from developing studies at below bright sunlight sparkles on the Gettysburg National Historical Park, Pa., blue waters of the Pacific Ocean and San to learning about Tlingit Indian Diego Harbor. handicrafts at Sitka National Historical Accompanied by park rangers, a group Park, Alaska, and from interpreting the of six persons in wheelchairs begins a role of black soldiers in the West at Fort tour of Cabrillo National Monument. The Larned National Historic Site, Kans., to guests take photographs of the exhibiting living history at Fort Pulaski magnificent view from the visitor center, National Historic Site, Ga. then the group sets a leisurely pace for a (Most participating parks presented visit to other parts of the national more than one program, and it is not monument. An important stop is the possible here to mention nearly all of statue of Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo, the them. COURIER has discussed the Urban Portuguese explorer who, in the Service Initiative previously, and has carried of Spain, sailed up this coast in 1542. short descriptions of a number of More pictures are taken here, all along projects.) the way and at the last stop, at the old As it happened, the Urban Initiative Point Loma Lighthouse. -
The Executive Branch's Limited Authority To
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2020 The Rocky Road to Energy Dominance: The Executive Branch’s Limited Authority to Modify and Revoke Withdrawals of Federal Lands from Mineral Production Robert L. Glicksman Hillary M. Hoffman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons The Rocky Road to Energy Dominance: The Executive Branch’s Limited Authority to Modify and Revoke Withdrawals of Federal Lands from Mineral Production Hillary M. Hoffmann* & Robert L. Glicksman** 33 GEO. J. ENVTL L., Issue # 2 (forthcoming) Abstract The Trump Administration’s implementation of its America First Energy Plan, whose goal is achieving U.S. “energy dominance,” has relied heavily upon public mineral development. Mineral development on federal lands is largely governed by statute. The statutory legal mechanisms by which the Executive Branch can “open” or “close” an area of federal lands to mineral development, whether onshore or offshore, are withdrawal, modification, and revocation. The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) are the primary statutes that govern onshore and offshore mineral development on over 2 billion acres of federal lands. Both FLPMA and OCSLA authorize withdrawals, which the Executive can use to place federal lands off limits to mineral development. FLPMA also authorizes modifications and revocations, which can remove constraints on such development. The Trump Administration has relied on both statutes in its quest to expand the areas that are available for private mineral disposition through modification or revocation of withdrawals by prior administrations. The authority provided by FLPMA and OCSLA to determine the availability of federal lands for mineral development is subject to a series of substantive and procedural constraints. -
APPENDIX 1A APPENDIX a UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS, TENTH CIRCUIT ———— Nos
APPENDIX 1a APPENDIX A UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, TENTH CIRCUIT ———— Nos. 17-7042, 17-7044 ———— The CHEROKEE NATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior; TARA KATUK MAC LEAN SWEENEY, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior; EDDIE STREATER, in his official capacity as Eastern Oklahoma Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Defendants, and UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA; UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA CORPORATION, Intervenors Defendants-Appellants. ———— 2a THE CHEROKEE NATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior; TARA KATUK MAC LEAN SWEENEY, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior; EDDIE STREATER, in his official capacity as Eastern Oklahoma Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Defendants-Appellants, and UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA; UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA CORPORATION, Intervenors-Defendants. ———— Filed September 5, 2019 ———— OPINION EID, Circuit Judge. Intervenor-Appellant the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma (UKB) is a federally recognized Indian tribe located in eastern Oklahoma. The UKB are descended from the historical Cherokee Indian tribe. In 2000, the UKB purchased an undevel- oped 76-acre parcel of land near Tahlequah, Oklahoma, with the intention of developing it into a tribal and cultural center (Subject Tract, or Subject Parcel). The 3a Subject Parcel sits entirely within the boundaries of the former reservation of Appellees the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma (Nation). -
Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.