Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice Volume 7 | Issue 1 Article 4 4-1-2001 Un/Re/Dis Covering Slave Breeding in Thirteenth Amendment Jurisprudence Pamela D. Bridgewater Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/crsj Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Pamela D. Bridgewater, Un/Re/Dis Covering Slave Breeding in Thirteenth Amendment Jurisprudence, 7 Wash. & Lee Race & Ethnic Anc. L. J. 11 (2001). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/crsj/vol7/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. UN/RE/DIS COVERING SLAVE BREEDING IN THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE Pamela D. Bridgewater* I. INTRODUCTION The traditional story of slavery in North America, specifically the United States, is one of forced labor. The unconstitutionality of involuntary servitude pervades the doctrine of the Thirteenth Amendment. Our legal culture generally recognizes that forcing people to work under certain conditions violates the Thirteenth Amendment. While the institution of slavery consisted of a carefully constructed web of conditions that included forced labor but was not limited to that alone, the Thirteenth Amendment's potential to reach those conditions is yet to be fully realized.