Politica E Commedia Al Femminile
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Passion for Opera the DUCHESS and the GEORGIAN STAGE
A Passion for Opera THE DUCHESS AND THE GEORGIAN STAGE A Passion for Opera THE DUCHESS AND THE GEORGIAN STAGE PAUL BOUCHER JEANICE BROOKS KATRINA FAULDS CATHERINE GARRY WIEBKE THORMÄHLEN Published to accompany the exhibition A Passion for Opera: The Duchess and the Georgian Stage Boughton House, 6 July – 30 September 2019 http://www.boughtonhouse.co.uk https://sound-heritage.soton.ac.uk/projects/passion-for-opera First published 2019 by The Buccleuch Living Heritage Trust The right of Paul Boucher, Jeanice Brooks, Katrina Faulds, Catherine Garry, and Wiebke Thormählen to be identified as the authors of the editorial material and as the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the authors. ISBN: 978-1-5272-4170-1 Designed by pmgd Printed by Martinshouse Design & Marketing Ltd Cover: Thomas Gainsborough (1727-1788), Lady Elizabeth Montagu, Duchess of Buccleuch, 1767. Portrait commemorating the marriage of Elizabeth Montagu, daughter of George, Duke of Montagu, to Henry, 3rd Duke of Buccleuch. (Cat.10). © Buccleuch Collection. Backdrop: Augustus Pugin (1769-1832) and Thomas Rowlandson (1757-1827), ‘Opera House (1800)’, in Rudolph Ackermann, Microcosm of London (London: Ackermann, [1808-1810]). © The British Library Board, C.194.b.305-307. Inside cover: William Capon (1757-1827), The first Opera House (King’s Theatre) in the Haymarket, 1789. -
Ottoman Empire & European Theatre VIII
Ottoman Empire & European Theatre VIII ______________ 28 – 29 M a y 2 0 1 5 International Symposium I s t a n b u l – Pera Museum Culture, Diplomacy and Peacemaking: Ottoman-European Relations in the Wake of the Treaty of Belgrade (1739) and the Era of Maria Theresia (r.1740–1780) Under the patronage of Exc. Hasan Göğüş Exc. Dr. Klaus Wölfer Ambassador of & Ambassador of the Republic of Turkey in Vienna the Republic of Austria in Ankara In cooperation with International Symposium Istanbul 2015 by Don Juan Archiv Wien OTTOMAN EMPIRE & EUROPEAN THEATRE VIII Culture, Diplomacy and Peacemaking: Ottoman-European Relations in the Wake of the Treaty of Belgrade (1739) and the Era of Maria Theresia (r.1740–1780) 28 – 29 May 2015 Istanbul, Pera Museum Organized by Don Juan Archiv Wien In cooperation with Pera Museum Istanbul, The UNESCO International Theatre Institute in Vienna (ITI) and The Austrian Cultural Forum in Istanbul PROGRAMME OVERVIEW Thursday, May 28th 2015 10:00–11:00 Opening Ceremony 11:00–11:30 Coffee Break 11:30–12:45 Session I “Of Ottoman Diplomacy” Seyfi Kenan The Education of an Ottoman Envoy during the Early Modern Period (Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries) John Whitehead The Embassy of Yirmisekizzade Said Mehmed Pasha to Paris (1742) 12:45–14:00 Lunch Break 14:00–15:15 Session II “The Siege of Belgrade (1789) and the Legend of a Field Marshal” Tatjana Marković Celebrating Field Marshal Gideon Ernest von Laudon (1717–1790) in European Literature and Music Michael Hüttler Celebrating Field Marshal Gideon Ernest von Laudon (1717–1790) in Theatre: The Siege of Belgrade on Stage 15:15–15:30 Coffee Break 15:30–16:45 Session III “Theatrical Aspects: Venice, Paris” Maria Alberti L’impresario delle Smirne (‘The Impresario from Smyrna’, 1759) by Carlo Goldoni (1707–1793), Namely the Naive Turk Aliye F. -
The Siege of Belgrade on Stage
Michael Hüttler THEATRE AND CULTURAL MEMORY: THE SIEGE OF BELGRADE ON STAGE Michael Hüttler (Vienna) Abstract: This contribution considers the historical image of Belgrade created by European playwrights and librettists of the eighteenth and nineteenth century. Istanbul has been for a long time the symbol of an oriental city and lifestyle in the Western European mind – an image that was transmitted especially in poetry and dramatic texts. Belgrade seems to be present in a different way in the European cultural memory. Analysis of the representation of history related to Belgrade in the medium of theatre is based on the four selected historical theatre texts: Hannah Brand’s Huniades, or The Siege of Belgrade (Norwich, 1791/1798); Carl Kisfaludy’s Ilka oder die Einnahme von Griechisch-Weissenburg (Pest, 1814); James Cobb’s The Siege of Belgrade (London 1791/1828); und Friedrich Kaiser’s General Laudon (Vienna, 1875). In this article I would like to investigate the historical image of Belgrade created by European playwrights and librettists of the eighteenth and nineteenth century. What are the contents transported in the dramatic texts about Belgrade? Is a certain historical-political context present, which dominates the entertainment factor? Istanbul has been for a long time the symbol of an oriental city and lifestyle in the Western European mind – an image that was transmitted especially in poetry and dramatic texts. Belgrade seems to be present in a different way in the European cultural memory. In his 1963 essay Sur Racine (‘On Racine’) Roland Barthes already posed the question of how to deal academically with the challenge of the relation between history and a work of art, be it music or a dramatic text. -
Introduction: the Royal Character in the Public Imagination 1
Notes Introduction: The Royal Character in the Public Imagination 1. I use the words “royal” and “monarch” (and their variants, “royalty,” “monarchy,” “monarchical,” etc.) interchangeably. By the late eigh- teenth century both terms in common usage referred equally to kings and to those who ruled (queens, regents). “Royal” also referred, and still does, to near relatives of the monarch, as in “royal family,” and I use it in this sense also. 2. Austen’s conservatism is famously unstable. Feminist critics espe- cially have suggested that a feminist subtext undercuts or at least tempers the conservative trajectories of her novels. In Equivocal Beings, Claudia Johnson provides a comprehensive discussion of the conservative reading of Emma as well as its implicit feminist critique (192–96). 3. Unlike Pride and Prejudice, in which she was revising an earlier draft, Austen wrote Mansfield Park, Emma, and Persuasion after 1810. She began writing Mansfield Park in February 1811, the same month in which the Regency began (Sturrock 30; see also Tomalin 223–24). 4. Clara Tuite suggests that Mansfield Park can be read as “a provincial deflection of the wider national issues of responsible hereditary gov- ernment” (Romantic Austen 132). 5. The phrase “Queen Caroline affair” historically refers to the events of 1820 and 1821, when the uncrowned King attempted to divorce his wife by Act of Parliament. Although Caroline was technically Queen, supporters of the new King used a variety of means, some political, some rhetorical, to contest her legitimacy. Similarities as well as an evident continuity between this episode and the Prince’s first attempt to obtain a divorce, some fifteen years earlier, have often led scholars to refer to their marital disputes before, during, and after the Regency as the Queen Caroline affair. -
No Play Title 651 102 94 a Bold Stroke for a Husband MISSING 77
No Play Title 651 102 94 A Bold Stroke for a Husband MISSING 77 A Bold Stroke for a Wife 889 A Cabinet Question 722 A Christmas Carol 709 A Close Seige 603 A Cure for Love MISSING 260 A Cure for the Heartache 415 A Day After the Fair 776 A Day at the Inn 425 A Day in Paris MISSING 531 A Day Well Spent 808 A Dead Shot 359 A Dream of the Future 981 A Familiar Friend 545 A Gentleman in Difficulties 403 A Good Night's Rest 989 A Good-looking Fellow MISSING 887 A Handsome Husband MISSING 887 A Hasty Conclusion MISSING 576 A House Divided MISSING 850 A Husband At Sight MISSING 852 A Kiss in the Dark 425 A Lady and a Gentleman 373 A Legend of Florence 809 A Lesson For Ladies MISSING 735 A Maiden’s Flame 488 A Marriage Noose 852 A Match in the Dark 459 A Message from the Sea 736 A Mistaken Story 1008 A Model of a Wife 7 A New Way to Pay Old Bet 623 A Night in the Bastille 878 A Perculiar Position 873 A Pleasant Neighbour MISSING 437 A Poor Young Man 946 A Quarter to Nine 987 A Quiet Day 337 A Roland for an Oliver 1010 A Romantic Idea 1006 A Rough Diamond 919 A Sailor's Legacy MISSING 716 A School for Grown Children 1055 A Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing 919 A Soldier and a Sailor, A Tinker and a Tailor MISSING 343 A Soldier's Courtship 881 A Trip to Kissengen 68 A Trip to Scarborough 1025 A Vision of Venus 33 A Winter's Tale MISSING 880 A Woman Never Vexed MISSING 490 A Woman Will Be a Woman MISSING 1038 A Wonderful Woman 814 Abelard and Heloise 543 Abroad and At Home MISSING 590 Advice Gratis 805 Agnes De Vere MISSING 778 Aldgate Pump MISSING 83 Alexander -
Descendants of Anthony Wilson
Descendants of Anthony Wilson 1-Anthony Wilson [6412] Anthony married someone. They had one son: Henry. 2-Henry Wilson [6410], son of Anthony Wilson [6412], was born in 1615. Henry married Dorothy Forest [6411] [MRIN: 2557]. They had two children: Anthony and John. 3-Anthony Wilson [6413] 3-John Wilson [6408] was buried on 19 Jun 1675 in Grasmere. John married Elizabeth [6409] [MRIN: 2555]. They had five children: Ellinor, Margaret, Elizabeth, Anthony and Dorothy. 4-Ellinor Wilson [6414] Ellinor married Isaac Haughton [6415] [MRIN: 2559], son of Wilfrid Haughton [13320] and Unknown. 4-Margaret Wilson [6416] 4-Elizabeth Wilson [6417] Elizabeth married John Hutchinson [6418] [MRIN: 2560]. 4-Anthony Wilson [6406]1 died on 21 Apr 1755 and was buried in Colthouse. Anthony married Dorothy Benson [6407]1 [MRIN: 808], daughter of George Benson [11484] and Margaret Braithwaite [11485], on 8 May 1702 in Colthouse. Dorothy was born on 17 Feb 1678 in Stang End and died on 23 May 1755 aged 77. They had six children: Elizabeth, John, George, Anthony, Isaac and Dorothy. 5-Elizabeth Wilson [6428] was born on 6 Apr 1703 and died on 9 Feb 1781 aged 77. Elizabeth married Reginald Holme [6429] [MRIN: 2566], son of Jacob Holme [34811] and Unknown, on 28 Feb 1742. Reginald was born on 12 Apr 1694 in Tarnefoot, Kendal and died on 18 Jun 1772 in Newcastle aged 78. They had one daughter: Elizabeth. 6-Elizabeth Holme [6430] was born on 3 Jan 1742 and died on 27 Nov 1792 in Newcastle aged 50. Elizabeth married Anthony Clapham [34812] [MRIN: 10442], son of Rev. -
Appendix: Chronology of Pirate Plays in Britain
Appendix: Chronology of Pirate Plays in Britain Heywood, Thomas.Fortune by Land at Sea (ca. 1607–1609). Daborne, Robert. A Christian Turn’d Turk (Most likely Whitefriars Hall, ca. 1609–1612). Fletcher, John, and Philip Massinger. The Double Marriage (King’s Men, ca. 1621). Fletcher, John and Philip Massinger. The Sea Voyage (King’s Men, 22 June 1622). Massinger, Philip. The Renegado; or, The Gentleman of Venice (Cockpit Theatre, 17 April 1624). Massinger, Philip. The Unnatural Combat (Globe Theatre, ca. 1625). Heywood, Thomas.The Fair Maid of the West; or, A Girl Worth Gold, Parts I and II (first performance of part 1 unrecorded; revived with part 2, Cockpit Theatre, 1630). Davenant, John. The History of Sir Francis Drake (Cockpit Theatre, 1658–59). [Music: Matthew Locke.] Behn, Aphra. The Rover; or, The Banish’d Cavaliers (Duke’s Theatre, 24 March 1677). Behn, Aphra. The Rover, Part II (Dorset Gardens, January 1681). Johnson, Charles. The Successful Pyrate (Drury Lane, 7 November 1712). Gay, John. The Beggar’s Opera (Lincoln Inn Fields, 29 January 1728). Anon. Love with Honour; or, The Privateer (Ipswich, 1753). Brown John. Barbarossa, a Tragedy (Drury Lane, 17 December 1754). Gay, John. Polly (Haymarket, 9 June 1777). Cobb, James. The Pirates (Haymarket, 21 November 1792). Cross, John Cartwright. Blackbeard; or, The Captive Princess (Royal Circus, April 1798). Cross, John Cartwright. The Genoese Pirate; or, Black Beard (Covent Garden, 15 Octo- ber 1798; 15 October 1809). Cross, John Cartwright. Sir Francis Drake, and Iron Arm (Royal Circus, 4 April 1800). [Music: Sanderson.] Astley, Philip, Jr. The Pirate; or, Harlequin Victor (Royal Amphitheatre, 25 August 1800; Royalty, 19 October 1801). -
Performance of the Self in the Theatre of the Elite the King's Theatre, 1760
Performance of the self in the theatre of the elite The King’s Theatre, 1760–1789: The opera house as a political and social nexus for women. Joanna Jarvis A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Birmingham City University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts, Design and Media This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/?ref=chooser-v1 October 2019 Volumes 1 & 2 0 1 Abstract This research takes as its starting point the King’s Theatre in London, known as the Opera House, between 1760 and 1789. It examines the elite women subscribers who were on display and their approach to self-presentation in this social and political nexus. It makes a close examination of four women who sat in the audience at that time, as exemplars of the various experiences and approaches to attending the opera. Recent research has examined the performative offerings at the Opera House, the constitution of the audience and the troubled management of the theatre in that period. What is missing, is an examination of the power of the visual in confirming and maintaining status. As a group the women presented a united front as members of the ruling class, but as individuals they were under observation, as much from their peers as others in the audience and the visual dynamic of this display has not been analysed before. The research uses a combination of methodological approaches from a range of disciplines, including history, psychology and phenomenology, in order to extrapolate a sense of the experience for these women. -
Lowell Libson
LOWELL LIBSON LTD 2 014 • LOWELL LIBSON LTD · 2014 New York: January 25 – February 1 Annual exhibition at Mitchell-Innes & Nash: British Art: Recent Acquisitions & Thomas Gainsborough: The Landscape of Refinement london: february 17 – february 28 Thomas Gainsborough: The Landscape of Refinement Maastricht: March 14 – 23 TEFAF: The European Fine Art Fair London: July 4 – July 11 Master Drawings & Sculpture Week London Art Week London: October 16 – october 19 Frieze Masters LOWELL LIBSON LTD 2 014 • LOWELL LIBSON LTD CONTENTS 3 Clifford Street · Londonw1s 2lf William John Bankes 8 Telephone: +44 (0)20 7734 8686 Fax: +44 (0)20 7734 9997 James Barry 12 Email: [email protected] Louis-Gabriel Blanchet 15 Website: www.lowell-libson.com The gallery is open by appointment, Monday to Friday Francis Cotes 20 The entrance is in Old Burlington Street Alexander Cozens 24 Lowell Libson John Robert Cozens 26 [email protected] Arthur Devis 34 Deborah Greenhalgh [email protected] John Flaxman 39 Jonny Yarker [email protected] Lucius Gahagan 46 Daniel Gardner 50 Hugh Douglas Hamilton 52 Victor-Marie Hugo 58 Sir Thomas Lawrence 60 Edward Lear 68 William Marlow 72 Samuel Palmer 76 Published by Lowell Libson Limited 2014 Sir Joshua Reynolds 78 Text and publication © Lowell Libson Limited All rights reserved Thomas Rowlandson 82 isbn 978 0 9563930 7 4 Cover: a sheet of 18th-century Italian Thomas Stothard 82 paste paper (collection: Lowell Libson) Frontispiece: Francis Cotes RA 1726–1770 Joseph Mallord William Turner 89 Detail from Mary Colebrooke, later Lady Aubrey, 1766 Benjamin West 102 Photography by Rodney Todd White & Son Ltd Designed and typeset in Dante by Dalrymple Joseph Wright of Derby 105 Colour reproduction by Altaimage Printed in Belgium by Albe De Coker Johan Zoffany 112 our annual catalogue relies entirely on the works we have in hand and it is this serendipity that gives each of these volumes an individual character. -
Speculative Development and the Origins and History of East India Company Settlement in Cavendish Square and Harley Street
Speculative development and the origins and history of East India Company settlement in Cavendish Square and Harley Street As London grew north and west in the eighteenth century, wealth settled on the new-built streets of the Cavendish-Harley (later Portland, now Howard de Walden) estate. This paper describes how, why and where individuals enriched through the East India Company came to ground in this part of London. The cases of Francis Shepheard, scion of an important company family, Governor Robert Adams, in flight from Tellicherry, his nephew Robert Orme, the historian of India, General Richard Smith, a notorious ‘Nabob’, and a few others elucidate the market-based origins and accidental then deliberate consolidation of this settlement and stand for many more East India Company names about whom at this point less is known. KEYWORDS speculative housing, East India Company, Cavendish Square, Harley Street, nabob, The transfer to London of wealth derived from commerce in India based in the activities of the East India Company was great and ramifying. But its points of landing and consequences are difficult to pin down. Many individual stories have been told and the impact of investment on British country houses in particular has been widely investigated, with a major project focusing on where and how wealth from India was spent in Britain recently completed.1 It is well known that as London’s West End grew northwards into the parish of St Marylebone in the eighteenth century the area was in significant measure populated by those with repatriated wealth from the Caribbean and India, and West Indian connections have now been mapped and quantified.2 That Harley Street and its immediate area in the West End had come by the early nineteenth century to be particularly associated with ‘nabobs’ returned well-heeled from India is also readily discovered. -
Introduction
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88967-4 - Romantic Drama: Acting and Reacting Frederick Burwick Excerpt More information Introduction The poet, John Keats insisted in his letter to Richard Woodhouse (October 27, 1818), has no self, no character, no identity, but is ever ready to assume identity and enter into a role: As to the poetical Character . it has no self – it is everything and nothing – It has no character – it enjoys light and shade; it lives in gusto, be it foul or fair, high or low, mean or elevated. It has as much delight in conceiving an Iago as an Imogen. What shocks the virtuous philosopher, delights the camelion Poet. It does no harm from its relish of the dark side of things any more than its taste for the bright one; because they both end in speculation. A Poet is the most unpoetical of anything in existence because he has no Identity; he is continually 1 in for and filling some other Body. To describe how the poetic imagination moves from nonentity to iden- tity, Keats introduces contrasting Shakespearean characters: the innocent Imogen, the evil Iago. Whatever their moral difference, both have equal affective value because “both end in speculation.” The poet is always ready for such role-playing, “continually in for and filling some other Body.” Keats’s theatrical metaphor for entering into character might seem to apply broadly to the assumptions about acting in the period. The successful performer, a Sarah Siddons or a John Philip Kemble, is pre- sumably one who can enter convincingly into role and become that character for the duration of the play. -
Transatlantic Nationalisms and Parallel Performances: Afterlife Texts of the Revolutionary Era
Transatlantic Nationalisms and Parallel Performances: Afterlife Texts of the Revolutionary Era by David Vinson A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama December 14, 2019 Keywords: afterlife, transatlantic, American Revolution, performance, nationalism, cultural studies Copyright 2019 by David Vinson Approved by Paula R. Backscheider, Chair, Eminent Scholar, English Hilary E. Wyss, Professor of English Diana Eidson, Assistant Professor of English Erich Nunn, Associate Professor of English Abstract This dissertation traces the rise to public prominence of Major John André, J. Hector St. John de Crèvecoeur, and Mary Robinson during the American Revolution, and it examines the ways in which they each inspire an afterlife legacy that takes on public dimensions in Britain and America well into the twenty-first century. My argument is that André, Crèvecoeur, and Robinson—in life, and during their extraordinary afterlives—are used in Britain and America for restorative purposes. Their public personas and works (literary and extraliterary) inspired the transatlantic publics of Britain and America, and they did so at a crucial time in the evolving identities of both nations. Afterlife analysis facilitates an understanding of how their personas and works are used in response to the varied crises brought on not only by the American Revolution, but by subsequent historical moments that have exposed deep uncertainties regarding national identity, good citizenry, male and female propriety, and sensibility. By tracing their afterlives as that which are informed by their wartime utility, I am able to identify patterns (as well as notable deviations) in terms of how, why, and by whom their personas and works are appropriated, reimagined, and remade.