DOCSLIB.ORG

The Conventional Military Balance in the Koreas and Northeast Asia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Conventional Military Balance in the Koreas and Northeast Asia The Conventional Military Balance in the Koreas and Northeast Asia By Anthony H. Cordesman With the assistance of Charles Ayers and Aaron Lin Working Draft: August 2, 2016 Please provide comments to [email protected] Photo Credit: Republic of Korea Armed Forces 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 DETERRENCE, RESTRAINT, AND LEVELS OF CONFLICT ...................................................................................................... 5 A Clash or Conflict between the DPRK and ROK ...................................................................................................... 6 LEVELS OF “CONVENTIONAL” CONFLICT ........................................................................................................................... 10 Open-Ended Scenarios and Escalation Ladders ................................................................................................... 10 Comparing Total “Conventional” Orders of Battle with Possible Combat Scenarios ........................... 12 The Limits to Conventional Force Comparisons ................................................................................................... 13 What to Count ..................................................................................................................................................................... 14 TOTAL MANPOWER ............................................................................................................................................................... 15 ARMY AND LAND FORCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 NAVAL AND MARINE FORCES .............................................................................................................................................. 31 AIR AND AIR DEFENSE FORCES, AND DPRK ARTILLERY, MRLS, ROCKETS, AND MISSILES ................................... 42 Fixed Wing Aircraft ........................................................................................................................................................... 42 Rotary Wing Aircraft ........................................................................................................................................................ 43 Surface-to-Air Missiles and Anti-Aircraft Guns ..................................................................................................... 51 Conventional Artillery and Surface-to-Surface Rockets and Missiles as a Counterbalance to Limits in Airpower ........................................................................................................................................................................... 55 DPRK ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 62 Leadership and Command and Control ................................................................................................................... 62 Force Size and Structure ................................................................................................................................................. 65 Potential Invasion Scenarios and Capacities ......................................................................................................... 71 Military Personnel ............................................................................................................................................................. 73 Recruitment and Training ............................................................................................................................................................................. 74 Weapons Systems and Equipment Deficiencies and Capabilities ................................................................................................ 78 Key Assets ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 79 Quality vs. Quantity .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 80 ROK .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 80 Responsibilities and Doctrine ....................................................................................................................................... 83 Indigenous Equipment Development ........................................................................................................................ 83 UNCERTAIN PATTERNS OF CONFLICT AND ESCALATION ................................................................................................ 83 Cheonan ................................................................................................................................................................................. 84 Yeonpyeong .......................................................................................................................................................................... 84 Conventional Provocations: 2010-2016 ................................................................................................................... 88 Political Fallout .................................................................................................................................................................. 88 Additional Issues and Scenarios .................................................................................................................................. 89 Table of Figures 3 • Figure II.3: Avenues of Approach from the DPRK to the ROK • Figure II.4: ROK Estimate of Korean Manpower Balance in 2014 • Figure II.5: ROK Estimate of Northeast Asian Force Manpower Balance in 2014 • Figure II.6: IISS Estimate of Total Active Military Manpower Affecting the Northeast Asian Balance in 2016 (in thousands) • Figure II.7: IISS Estimate of Total Military Reserve Manpower, Affecting the Northeast Asian Balance in 2016 (in thousands) • Figure II.8: ROK Estimate of Korean Force Balance in 2014 (Army) • Figure II.9: ROK Estimate of Northeast Asian Force Land Balance in 2014 • Figure II.10: IISS Estimate of Army Manpower and Equipment in Northeast Asia in 2016 • Figure II.11: IISS Estimate of Northeast Asian Modern Main Battle Tanks versus Total Holdings in 2016 • Figure II.12: IISS Estimate of Total Northeast Asian Armored Fighting Vehicles (Army) in 2016 • Figure II.13: IISS Estimate of Total Northeast Asian Modern versus Not Modern Armored Vehicles in 2016 • Figure II.14: IISS Estimate of Total Northeast Asian Artillery Strength in 2016 • Figure II.15: ROK Estimate of Korean Naval Balance in 2014 • Figure II.16. IISS Estimate of Total Navy Manpower and Equipment in Northeast Asia in 2016 • Figure II.17: IISS Estimate of Total Northeast Asian Naval Combat Ships in 2016 • Figure II.18: IISS Estimate of Total Northeast Asian Naval Combat Ships by Category in 2016 • Figure II.19: IISS Estimate of Total Northeast Asian Submarines by Type in 2016 • Figure II.21: IISS Estimate of Total Air Force Manpower and Equipment in Northeast Asia in 2016 • Figure II.22: IISS Estimate of Total Northeast Asian Fixed Wing Combat Aircraft by Branch in 2016 • Figure II.23: IISS Estimate of Total Northeast Asian Fixed Wing Aircraft by Type in 2016 • Figure II.24: IISS Estimate of Total Northeast Asian Rotary Wing Combat Aircraft by Force in 2016 • Figure II.25: IISS Estimate of Total Northeast Asian Rotary Wing Aircraft by Type in 2016 • Figure II.26: IISS Estimate of Total Northeast Asian Air/Missile Defenses in 2016 • Figure II.27: IISS Estimate of Total Korean and Northeast Asian Air/Missile Defenses in 2016 • Figure II.28: Northeast Asian Missile and Bomb Capabilities • Figure II.29: IISS Estimate of Total Paramilitary Manpower and Equipment in Northeast Asia in 2016 • Figure II.30: ROK Diagram of DPRK Force Organization • Figure II.31: Deployment of DPRK Ground Forces in 2015 4 • Figure II.32: Deployment of DPRK Air Forces in 2015 • Figure II.33: Deployment of DPRK Naval Forces in 2015 • Figure II.34: DPRK Training Program for Military Officers • Figure II.35: DPRK Military Exercises and Activities • Figure II.36: Command Structure of ROK Forces • Figure II.37: The Cheonan Sinking and Shelling of Yeonpyeong Island (2010) • Figure II.38: The Northern Limit Line and Yeonpyeong Island 5 Introduction Military balance has long been a key factor shaping the stability of the Koreas and Northeast Asia. For decades, the DPRK has shaped the military balance in the Koreas through periods of deliberate confrontation and military threats, threatening military movements and exercises, a steady military build-up, and sporadic acts of low-level violence ranging from assassination to artillery attacks and ship sinkings. It has focused on ROK targets, but has also consistently threatened the United States. There is no one view of the military balance that is likely to shape any conflict between the Koreas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sunshine in Korea
    CENTER FOR ASIA PACIFIC POLICY International Programs at RAND CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces. Sunshine in Korea The South Korean Debate over Policies Toward North Korea Norman D.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline Korean Conflict-1950
    Timeline Korean Conflict-1950 June 25 North Korean Army invades South Korea. June 25 June 26 June 26 June 27 July 3 United States forces clash with North Korean forces. July 4 July 7 UN Res. 84 request U.S. designate a commander of UN forces in Korea. July 8 Gen. Douglas MacArthur named commander of UN forces in Korea. September 1 North Korean divisions open assault on UN lines. September 1 October 1 South Korean troops cross 38th parallel to North Korea. October 6 October 7 United States forces cross 38th parallel to North Korea. October 15 October 19 UN forces enter the capital Pyongyang, North Korea. November 4 United States troops vacate Pyongyang, North Korea. December 28 Chinese troops cross 38th parallel into South Korea. Student Name: ________________________________ Class Period: _________ Date: ______________ Korean Conflict-1950 Who was really in charge of the Korean War; United Nations or the United States? Description of What evidence supports What evidence supports Why is this evidence Source (Author, the United States? the United Nations? significant? Date & Title) Source 3 Source 4 Source 5 Based on the evidence, who was really in charge of the Korean conflict? Description of What evidence supports What evidence supports Why is this evidence Source (Author, the United States? the United Nations? significant? Date & Title) Source 6 Source 7 Based on the evidence, who was really in charge of the Korean conflict? Student Name: ________________________________ Class Period: _________ Date: ______________ Description of What evidence supports What evidence supports Why is this evidence Source (Author, the United States? the United Nations? significant? Date & Title) Source 8 Source 9 Based on the evidence, who was really in charge of the Korean conflict? Final Assessment: Student Editorial An editorial is a form of persuasive writing that is meant to provide the writer an opportunity to express to the reader their position over a specific topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Trade Partnership Between the South Korea and Turkey: The
    Emerging Trade Partnership between the South Korea and Turkey: The Case of Defense Industry Güney Kore ve Türkiye Arasında Gelişen Ticaret Ortaklığı: Savunma Sanayi Örneği * Engin AKMAN Abstract Defense is a crucial industry that nations invest for economic and strategic reasons. The world allocates 2.3% of gross domestic product for defense expenditure. Global trends show that developing countries increase their share in defense markets. Developing countries are expected to have more significant effect on the future of defense markets and therefore, understanding the cooperation between those countries is 137 important in the realms of defense literature. The current study is focused 137 Güvenlik Güvenlik on the issue of defense industry partnership between two emerging Stratejileri Stratejileri nations, the South Korea and Turkey, which hasn’t been addressed Yıl: 8 Yıl: 12 adequately. Both countries have compatible bases and products that make Sayı:16 defense collaboration easier. Joint development and production are on the Sayı: 23 rise between the two countries, which formerly greatly depended on direct procurement.The case of the South Korea and Turkey is a successful example of trade partnership that has strong prospects. Keywords: Defense Collaboration, Defense Procurement, Korea, Turkey, International Trade. * Yrd.Doç.Dr., Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi, Uluslararası Ticaret Bölümü, e-posta: [email protected]. Engin AKMAN Öz Savunma sanayi, ülkelerin ekonomik ve stratejik nedenlerle yatırım yaptığı önemli bir sektördür. Tüm dünyada gayrisafi millî hâsılanın %2,3’ü savunma harcamalarına ayrılmaktadır. Küresel eğilimler göstermektedir ki, gelişmekte olan ülkeler savunma sektöründeki pazar paylarını artırmaktadır. Gelişmekte olan ülkelerin savunma endüstrisi pazarlarının geleceğinde daha etkin olacağı beklenmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE 5 AADH05 OFC+Spine.Indd 1 the Mortar Company
    ARTILLERY AND AIR DEFENCE ARTILLERY ISSUE 5 HANDBOOK HANDBOOK – ISSUE 5 PUBLISHED MARCH 2018 THE CONCISE GLOBAL INDUSTRY GUIDE ARTILLERY AND AIR DEFENCE AADH05_OFC+spine.indd 1 3/16/2018 10:18:59 AM The Mortar Company. CONFRAG® CONTROLS – THE NEW HIGH EXPLOSIVE STANDARD HDS has developed CONFRAG® technology to increase the lethal performance of the stan- dard High Explosive granade for 60 mm CDO, 60 mm, 81 mm and 120 mm dramatically. The HE lethality is increased by controlling fragmentation mass and quantity, fragment velocity and fragment distribution, all controlled by CONFRAG® technology. hds.hirtenberger.com AADH05_IFC_Hirtenberger.indd 2 3/16/2018 9:58:03 AM CONTENTS Editor 3 Introduction Tony Skinner. [email protected] Grant Turnbull, Editor of Land Warfare International magazine, welcomes readers to Reference Editors Issue 5 of Shephard Media’s Artillery and Air Defence Handbook. Ben Brook. [email protected] 4 Self-propelled howitzers Karima Thibou. [email protected] A guide to self-propelled artillery systems that are under development, in production or being substantially modernised. Commercial Manager Peter Rawlins [email protected] 29 Towed howitzers Details of towed artillery systems that are under development, in production or Production and Circulation Manager David Hurst. being substantially modernised. [email protected] 42 Self-propelled mortars Production Elaine Effard, Georgina Kerridge Specifications for self-propelled mortar systems that are under development, in Georgina Smith, Adam Wakeling. production or being substantially modernised. Chairman Nick Prest 53 Towed mortars Descriptions of towed heavy mortar systems that are under development, in CEO Darren Lake production or being substantially modernised.
    [Show full text]
  • Warriors, Katchi Kapshida! 2019D 2I /RUC Calendar Inside 2 the INDIANHEAD INDIANHEAD December 2018 Vol
    December 2018 VOL. 55, ISSUE 12 December 2018 1 HEADQUARTERS, CAMP Humphreys, REPUBLIC OF KOREA INDIANHEAD SERVING THE 2ND INFANTRY DIVISION COMMUNITY SINCE 1963 WWW.2ID.KOREA.ARMY.MIL WARRIORS, KATCHI KAPSHIDA! 2019D 2I /RUC CALENDAR INSIDE 2 THE INDIANHEAD INDIANHEAD December 2018 vol. 55, issue 12 PHOTO OF THE MONTH (Photo of the Month) A M109A6 Paladin from Battery B, 1st Battalion, 4th Field Artillery Regiment, 3rd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Armored Division Features fires a 155mm inert training round during the Table VI Gunnery exercise Dec. 5 at Firing Point 95, Republic Of Korea. Table VI Gunnery is an annual training requirement for Field Artillery units to qualify individual howitzer crews and 03 Leader’s Corner platoon Fire Direction Centers. This training focuses on overall readiness and maintaining Field Artillery core competencies at the section level. (U.S. Army 04 Indianhead Legacy photo by 1st. Lt. Sean M. Kealey, 4-1 Field Artillery) 05 Warriors on the Street/Ask the Doc 06 2019 2ID/RUCD Calendar 30 The 2nd Engineer Battalion commemorates Battle of Kunu-ri 32 Travel Korea 34 U.S. Army pilots, first responders to Korean helicopter crash 35 Regiment Page Soldiers assigned to the 2nd Engineer Battalion,30 3rd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Armored Division reenact the Battle of Kunu-Ri in which battalion commander Lt. Col. Alarich Zacherle gave the order to burn the battalion colors to prevent them from becoming a Chinese war trophy Nov. 30 at Camp Casey, Republic of Korea. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Alon Humphrey, 3rd ABCT, 1st AD Public Affairs) December 2018 33 INDIANHEAD Maj.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Transformation on the Korean Peninsula: Technology Versus Geography
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL Military Transformation on the Korean Peninsula: Technology Versus Geography Being a Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy At the University of Hull By Soon Ho Lee BA, Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea, 2004 MA, The University of Birmingham, United Kingdom, 2005 MRes, King’s College London, United Kingdom, 2006 1 Acknowledgement I am the most grateful to my Supervisor Dr. David Lonsdale for his valuable academic advice and support during the long PhD journey. To reach this stage, I have had invaluable support from my family back in Korea and my dear wife Jin Heon. I would also like to thank my family for being so patient while I was researching. During this journey, I have obtained a precious jewel in my daughter, Da Hyeon. I will pray for you all my life. I would like to give special thanks to my late grandfather who gave me the greatest love, and taught me the importance of family. 2 Thesis Summary This thesis provides an explanation of one RMA issue: the effectiveness of contemporary military technology against tough geography, based upon case studies in the Korean peninsula. The originality of the thesis is that it will provide a sound insight for potential foes’ approach to the dominant US military power (superior technology and sustenance of war). The North Korean defence strategy – using their edge in geography and skill – tried to protect themselves from the dominant US power, but it may be impossible to deter or defeat them with technological superiority alone.
    [Show full text]
  • South Korean Efforts to Counter North Korean Aggression
    http://www.au.af.mil/au/csds/ South Korean Efforts to Counter North The Trinity Site Korean Aggression Papers By Major Aaron C. Baum, USAF http://www.au.af.mil/au/csds/ Recent North Korean nuclear aggression has raised debates Prior to the armistice, President Dwight Eisenhower signaled about how the United States should secure its interests in North- his willingness to use nuclear weapons to end the Korean Con- east Asia. However, any action on the peninsula should consid- flict. He then reiterated his resolve should China and North Ko- er the security preferences of American allies, especially the rea reinitiate hostilities.3 From 1958 to 1991, the United States Republic of Korea (ROK). With militaristic rhetoric coming stationed nuclear artillery, bombs, and missiles in South Korea from the Trump administration, the question arises of how im- to counter a North Korean invasion.4 Further, in 1975 the Ford portant U.S. policy is to the actions of our Korean allies in administration affirmed that the United States would consider countering North Korean (DPRK) nuclear aggression. Thus, it the use of nuclear weapons in a conflict “likely to result in de- is important to review nuclear crises of the past and the align- feat in any area of great importance to the United States in Asia ment of U.S. and ROK policy toward Pyongyang. This paper … including Korea.”5 reviews three periods of nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula It was not until 1978 at the 11th Security Consultative and argues that U.S. military policy is not the sole factor deter- Mechanism (SCM) that extended nuclear deterrence was for- mining South Korean response to DPRK nuclear provocation.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter for the Baltics Week 9 2018
    Royal Danish Embassy T. Kosciuskos 36, LT-01100 Vilnius Tel: +370 (5) 264 8768 Mob: +370 6995 7760 The Defence Attaché To Fax: +370 (5) 231 2300 Estonia, Latvia & Lithuania Newsletter for the Baltics Week 9 2018 The following information is gathered from usually reliable and open sources, mainly from the Baltic News Service (BNS), respective defence ministries press releases and websites as well as various newspapers, etc. Table of contents LITHUANIA .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Kaspersky considers contesting Lithuania’s decision to restrict its software ............................ 2 Drills will allow better preparation for hybrid threats .................................................................. 3 LATVIA ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Latvian and Japanese defence ministers agree to continue cooperation in cyber-defence ...... 3 Russian military ship spotted near Latvian waters ....................................................................... 4 AP article on Latvia’s Rimsevics was picked up by websites used for Russian propaganda ...... 4 ESTONIA .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Poll: Estonians’ will to defend their country remains high ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Land Forces Modernisation Projects 8 2.1 Denmark’S Defence Agreement 2018-2023 9 2.2 Hungary’S Zrinyi 2026 10 2.3 the United Kingdom’S to the Future and Beyond
    Food for thought 03-2021 Land Forces Modernisation Challenges of Transformation Written by Miguel Gonzalez Buitrago Lucia Santabarbara AN EXPERTISE FORUM CONTRIBUTING TO EUROPEAN CONTRIBUTING TO FORUM AN EXPERTISE SINCE 1953 ARMIES INTEROPERABILITY European Army Interoperability Center Simone Rinaldi This paper was drawn up by Miguel Gonzalez Buitrago, Lucia Santabarbara and Sim- one Rinaldi under the supervision and guidance of Mr Mario Blokken, Director of the Permanent Secretariat. This Food for Thought paper is a document that gives an initial reflection on the theme. The content is not reflecting the positions of the member states but consists of elements that can initiate and feed the discussions and analyses in the domain of the theme. All our studies are available on www.finabel.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Chapter 1: Military Doctrine and Warfare Scenarios 3 1.1 Unconventional Warfare 4 1.2 Asymmetric Warfare 6 1.3 Hybrid Warfare 7 Chapter 2: Land Forces Modernisation Projects 8 2.1 Denmark’s Defence Agreement 2018-2023 9 2.2 Hungary’s Zrinyi 2026 10 2.3 The United Kingdom’s to the Future and Beyond. 11 2.4 Greece’s Future Force Structure 2013-2027 12 2.5 Finland’s Total Defence 14 Chapter 3: Cutting edge technology: “Looking at the near future.” 15 3.1 Drones and Jammers 17 3.2 Drone Swarms 19 3.3 Hypersonic Weaponry 19 Chapter 4: Modernisation of Military Training 20 Conclusions 22 Bibliography 23 2 INTRODUCTION Land Force Modernisation is a process that omous systems. These may shape the nature entails changes of military equipment and ca- of conflict and facilitate ground forces oper- pacities at the strategic, operational, and tac- ations in challenging contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue102 – Mar 2010
    CASCABEL Journal of the ROYAL AUSTRALIAN ARTILLERY ASSOCIATION (VICTORIA) INCORPORATED ABN 22 850 898 908 Number 102 Published Quarterly in March 2010 Victoria Australia Article Pages Assn Contacts, Conditions & Copyright 3 The President Writes 4 Membership Report 5 From the Colonel Commandant 6 From the CO 2/10 Fd Regt 7 Range Fuel 9 SSgt Ernie Paddon 12 First M-ATVs Deploy to Afghanistan 13 Bushmaster Infantry Mobility Vehicle 14 Mordialloc’s 25 Pdrs 16 VALE Maj Ron Glew 19 2nd/10th Field Regiment 2006 - In Focus 20 A Fd Bty RAA 21 Maj M T Armstrong 28 Salutes & Victoria Cross Recipients 30 Artillery Replacement Gets Go-Ahead 31 Helmand Stories 35 Bdr Travis Whittaker 37 Celebrating the last Huey 38 Huey at Dandenong RSL 39 The Battle of Long Tan Enquiry 40 David Osborne 41 Some Other Military Reflections 42 Invitation Gunner 2010 45 RAA Association (Vic) Inc Corp Shop 46 Parade Card 47 Changing your address? See cut-out proforma 47 Current Postal Addresses All mail for the Association, except matters concerning Cascabel, should be addressed to: The Secretary RAA Association (Vic) Inc. 8 Alfada Street Caulfield South Vic. 3167 All mail for the Editor of Cascabel, including articles and letters submitted for publication, should be sent direct to….. Alan Halbish 115 Kearney Drive Aspendale Gardens Vic 3195 (H) 9587 1676 [email protected] 2 RAA Association (VIC) Inc CONTENTS AND SUBMISSIONS Committee The contents of CASCABEL Journal are determined President: MAJ Neil Hamer RFD by the editor. Articles or opinions of authors & 9702 2100 contributors are their own, and do not necessarily Vice President: Lt Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Jus in Bello in the Cheonan and Yeonpyeong Island Attacks
    War on the Korean Peninsula? Application of Jus in Bello in the Cheonan and Yeonpyeong Island Attacks Seunghyun Sally Nam* The media often reports that the Korean Peninsula remains technically in a state of war, but there remains uncertainty about whether its countries are still legally at war. On December 6, 2010, the International Criminal Court (ICC) released a statement that it was initiating a preliminary examination to determine whether it had jurisdiction over the sinking of the South Korean warship Cheonan by a North Korean submarine, as well as over North Korean artillery attacks near Yeonpyeong Island. For the two attacks to fall under the jurisdiction of the ICC, they must be found to be “war crimes,” which would require that the laws of war (jus in bello) be in effect at the times they were committed. Because the signing of the Korean * S.J.D. Candidate, University of Pennsylvania Law School; M.Jur, Oxford University, 2007; LL.M, Korea University, 2009; LL.B, Korea University, 2004. The author thanks Professors Dapo Akande, Jean Galbraith, Boris Kondoch for their thoughts and comments on an earlier draft of the Article. The author also appreciates invaluable comments from Dr. You Ki-Jun and Mr. Hwang Jun-Shik at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade in Seoul, Korea. This Article does not represent the view of the Korean government. Special thanks to the editors at the University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review for their excellent editing and feedback. Lastly, the author is grateful to Professors Park Ki-Gab and Jung Kyung-Soo for their mentorship, and her family for their continuous support.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Defence Forces' Annual Report 2020
    Annual Report 2020 ESTONIAN DEFENSE FORCES ANNUAL REPORT 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD || Lt. Gen. Martin Herem 4 RUSSIA’S SECURITY POLICY AND MILITARY DEVELOPMENTS || Military Intelligence Centre 6 FIGHTING THE PANDEMIC || Maj. Indrek Olveti 16 NATO MULTINATIONAL DIVISION NORTH || Command Sgt. Maj. Andreas Rebane 20 ESTONIA AND ALLIES 24 SWIFT AND BOLD – 5 RIFLES IN ESTONIA || Björn Malmquist 34 STRONG BOND CEMENTED || Maj. Allan Møller-Petersen 36 LESSONS FROM THE EXERCISE SPRING STORM || Maj. Gen. Indrek Sirel 38 ESTONIA RECEIVES NEW RIFLES || Ramil Lipp 42 SELF-PROPELLED ARTILLERY K9 THUNDER 46 MILITARY FIELD HOSPITAL DEPLOYS IN KURESSAARE || Maj. Helena Roon 50 US DRONES IN ESTONIA || Lt. Col. Kristo Lipasaar 52 NEW WINDS FOR THE NAVY || Commodore Jüri Saska 56 Soldier from the Viru ESTONIAN SPECIAL FORCES IN MALI || Lt. Col. Margus Kuul 62 Infantry Battalion, 1st Infantry Brigade, looks out from a trench at the MILITARY SERVICE 64 central training ground near Tapa, Estonia, May 7. EDF photo by Junior THE FUTURE BELONGS TO ROBOTIC SYSTEMS || Gert D. Hankewitz 66 Sgt. Jaan Vanaaseme 3 TO THE READER LT. GEN. MARTIN HEREM Commander, Estonian Defense Forces ou are holding the year 2020 of the Estonian Defense Forces. While these reports include a lot about the COVID-19 pandemic, it remains only a «flavor» of our activities. The short Yglances in the annual report focus on the development of our military that contin- ued in spite of the virus. We were unable to conduct snap exer- cises to our reservists, the type of exercises usually measure the quality and efficiency of our activities.
    [Show full text]