Restoration Potential of Several Native Species of Bivalve Molluscs for Water Quality Improvement in Mid-Atlantic Watersheds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Restoration Potential of Several Native Species of Bivalve Molluscs for Water Quality Improvement in Mid-Atlantic Watersheds Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 37, No. 5, 1121–1157, 2018. RESTORATION POTENTIAL OF SEVERAL NATIVE SPECIES OF BIVALVE MOLLUSCS FOR WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN MID-ATLANTIC WATERSHEDS DANIELLE A. KREEGER,1* CATHERINE M. GATENBY2 AND PETER W. BERGSTROM3 1Partnership for the Delaware Estuary, 110 S. Poplar Street, Suite 202, Wilmington, DE 19063; 2U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lower Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, 1101 Casey Road, Basom, NY 14013; 3PO Box 504, Saxtons River, VT 05154 ABSTRACT Bivalve molluscs provide water quality benefits throughout mid-Atlantic watersheds, such as Chesapeake Bay and the Delaware River basins. Whereas most of the attention has focused on the role of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica, there are many other bivalve species, in both salt and fresh waters, that provide similar benefits. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding the capacity of diverse mid-Atlantic bivalves to filter particles and potentially enhance water clarity and quality. Species with the greatest clearance rates and population carrying capacity were also considered for their restoration and enhancement potential. Compared with eastern oysters, several additional species of saltwater bivalves and freshwater mussels are reported to filter water at rates that merit restoration attention and have been shown to attain significant population sizes. More work is needed to estimate system-carrying capacity and to eliminate restoration bottlenecks for some species—all bivalve species have constraints on their distribution and abundance. Nevertheless, a diversified, watershed-wide bivalve restoration strategy is likely to be more successful than a monospecific focus because it would address pollutant issues in more diverse places and multiple habitats along the river to estuary continuum. KEY WORDS: bivalve, restoration, water quality, clearance, filtration INTRODUCTION data sources and observations from scientists, managers, and restoration practitioners in the mid-Atlantic study area. By Bivalve molluscs provide water quality benefits throughout contrast, there is a rich published literature on the feeding coastal watersheds, such as the Chesapeake Bay and Delaware physiology, restoration, and culture methods of commercially River Basin. Most of the attention on those benefits has focused important species [e.g., oysters Crassostrea virginica;blue on the role of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, mussels Mytilus edulis (Linnaeus, 1758)], and for those species 1791) in estuarine ecosystems (Newell 1988, Pomeroy et al. the reader is directed to comprehensive reviews by other au- 2006, Cerco & Noel 2007). There are a number of other bivalve thors (Bayne & Newell 1983, Kennedy et al. 1996, Cranford species, however, that might provide similar benefits in other et al. 2011). habitat niches that span the salinity gradient, including Mid-Atlantic bivalves include diverse species that live in headwater streams, large rivers, tidal fresh and brackish saltwater, freshwater tidal, and freshwater nontidal areas, zones, and saltwater areas. The water quality benefits of these extending from the headwaters to the mouths of coastal bays. bivalves are poorly understood, compared with those of Kreeger and Kraeuter (2010) tallied more than 60 species of oysters. The intent of this review is to summarize the knowl- bivalves in the Delaware River Basin, for example. Generally, edge about the filtration ability of bivalves (other than oys- the same mid-Atlantic species occur in the Chesapeake Bay as in ters) that live in mid-Atlantic watersheds, such as the the Delaware River, with the exception that there are 15 more Chesapeake and Delaware systems. This review also discusses species of freshwater mussels in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. their conservation status and restoration prospects to assist Some of these species are rare, but many are abundant enough scientists and coastal resource managers throughout the mid- to be considered ‘‘ecologically significant’’ (Kreeger & Kraeuter Atlantic region in planning and prioritizing research and man- 2010), meaning that they can reach sufficient population agement activities. abundance to provide water quality benefits or other ecosystem The intended audience for this review includes scientists, services (Table 1). managers, and restoration practitioners, and, therefore, the The ability of filter-feeding bivalves to improve water prose and depth of referencing vary among sections that are quality has been the subject of intense research and debate for likely to be of greatest interest to different sectors. The imbal- the past 30 y or more (Pomeroy et al. 2006, Newell et al. anced referencing also reflects variability in the quality and 2007). Most of the attention on those benefits has focused on quantity of available information for commercial versus non- theroleoftheeasternoysterCrassostrea virginica,which commercial, and freshwater versus saltwater species. Much of inhabits subtidal and low intertidal estuarine areas having a the available data on the range, physiology, and restoration salinity of 10–30. Some of the other bivalve species live in potential for species other than oysters are not in peer-reviewed niches that can overlap with C. virginica, such as the ribbed literature. To summarize what is known about their potential mussel Geukensia demissa (Dillwyn, 1817), which is a pre- benefits to water quality, preferred habitat niches, and their res- dominantly intertidal species. Other species live in areas toration promise, this review necessarily considers unpublished where oysters are absent, such as freshwater mussels *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Table 1). A variety of mussel species live in various niches DOI: 10.2983/035.037.0524 extending from small headwater streams to tidal fresh zones 1121 1122 KREEGER ET AL. TABLE 1. Summary of ecosystem services furnished by oysters, ribbed mussels and freshwater mussels categorized according to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (adapted from Kreeger & Kraeuter 2010). Bivalve natural capital Relative importance scores Categories Ecosystem services Oysters Ribbed mussels Freshwater mussels Provisioning Dockside product (e.g., seafood and shells) OOO – O Regulating Shoreline and bottom protection (e.g., wave attenuation) OOO OO O Shoreline and bottom stabilization (e.g., bed stability) OO OOO OO Supporting Structural habitat (e.g., essential fish habitat) OOO OO OO Biodiversity (e.g., imperiled species) – – OOO Biofiltration (e.g., seston removal) OOO OOO OOO Biogeochemistry (e.g., nutrient transformation) OO OO OO Trophic (e.g., prey value) OOOOO Cultural, spiritual historical, Watermen lifestyle, ecotourism OO human health Native American heritage (e.g., shells) OO – OOO Watershed indicator (e.g., environmental status and trends) OOO OO OOO Bio-assessment (e.g., toxicity testing) OOO OO OOO of estuaries (Ortmann 1911, 1919, Bogan & Ashton 2016). A In areas where the bivalve population is dense relative to the singular focus on oyster restoration may therefore miss op- residence time of the water mass, bivalve filter feeding can result portunities to enhance ecosystem services in areas of the wa- in a direct improvement in water clarity and light penetration tershed that oysters do not inhabit. (Cloern 1982, Sousa et al. 2009, Cerco & Noel 2010). The actual The concept of restoring (and conserving) populations of effects of filter feeding on water quality depend on the volumes bivalves other than oysters for the principal purposes of sus- of water filtered by the combined population biomass of the taining and improving water quality has been gaining attention. bivalves, the temperature which regulates physiological activity, For example, one of the actions under the 2009 Executive and the concentration and composition of particles in the water. Order 13,508, ‘‘Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration’’ Population biomass density (e.g., kilograms of dry tissue mass was ‘‘FW20 White paper: evaluate native bivalve restoration per hectare) is therefore a useful metric for gauging the eco- for water quality improvement.’’ Action 1 was stated as follows: logical impacts of bivalve assemblages in situ. Population bio- ‘‘Complete literature review of relevant studies on the ability of mass density combines the numerical abundance (per hectare) tidal and nontidal (freshwater and estuarine) bivalves to enhance and body size (per animal); therefore, smaller bivalves can still water quality. Where the literature review finds gaps, identify have a large impact on water quality if they achieve sufficient topic areas and funding needed to support new studies to evaluate densities. Water clarity depends on concentrations of total the effect of native bivalves on Bay water quality.’’ suspended solids, and areas with a greater biomass density of This review was written in response to that action. Although bivalves will have greater potential for enhancing water clarity investments in bivalve populations can be considered a new best than areas with lower population biomass. Reductions in spe- management practice (BMP) for enhancing water quality, these cific pollutants, such as particulate forms of nutrients and efforts should not be viewed as a replacement for traditional pathogens, depend on biomass density of the bivalve pop- BMP. Indeed, the water quality benefits of bivalves will scale ulation and the composition of the pollutants in the seston. mainly with their population biomass, which will be constrained
Recommended publications
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University M'ProCms International A Ben & Howe'' Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor Ml 40106-1346 USA 3-3 761-4 700 800 501 0600 Order Numb e r 9022566 S o m e aspects of the functional morphology of the shell of infaunal bivalves (Mollusca) Watters, George Thomas, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Zebra & Quagga Mussels: Species Guide
    SPECIES IN DEPTH Zebra and Quagga Mussels NATIVE AND INVASIVE RANGE Zebra mussels are native to the Caspian and Black Seas (Eurasia); quagga mussels are native to the Dneiper River drainage in Ukraine. Both mussels have invaded freshwater systems of the United Kingdom, Western Europe, Canada, and the United States. In the United States, zebra mussels were established in the Great Lakes by 1986; quagga mussels were discovered in the Erie Canal and Lake Ontario in 1991. Now, zebra mussels are widespread in the Great Lakes and all Randy Westbrooks the major river drainages east of the Rocky Mountains. Zebra Mussel Quagga mussels are mostly confined to the lower Great Dreissena polymorpha Lakes area and seem to be replacing zebra mussels where their populations overlap. The zebra mussel is a West Coast distribution freshwater bivalve that, true to its name, is often Quagga and zebra mussels have breached the striped with dark bands Rockies and invaded Western states. Quagga mussels like a zebra, but it can were discovered in Lake Mead (Arizona) in 2007, and Fred Snyder Fred also be pure black or within months their shells were washing up on the unpigmented. This small mussel (about 3 cm shores of Lake Mohave (borders Arizona, California, long) is can be recognized from other mussels by and Nevada), and Lake Havasu (borders California and its triangular shape and one flat edge where its Arizona). From there, the mussels were transported byssal threads (for attaching to hard surfaces; see into many Southern California reservoirs via infested inset photo) emerge. However, it is not as easily Colorado River water that runs through aqueducts distinguished from quagga mussels, as both to the reservoirs, providing the region with half of its have byssal threads, which is a key feature for drinking water.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 402/2
    ISSNO0428-9345 FAO Asia Diagnostic Guide to FISHERIES TECHNICAL Aquatic Animal Diseases PAPER 402/2 NETWORK OF AQUACULTURE CENTRES IN ASIA-PACIFIC C A A N Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations A F O F S I I A N T P A ISSNO0428-9345 FAO Asia Diagnostic Guide to FISHERIES TECHNICAL Aquatic Animal Diseases PAPER 402/2 Edited by Melba G. Bondad-Reantaso NACA, Bangkok, Thailand (E-mail: [email protected]) Sharon E. McGladdery DFO-Canada, Moncton, New Brunswick (E-mail: [email protected]) Iain East AFFA, Canberra, Australia (E-mail: [email protected]) and Rohana P. Subasinghe NETWORK OF FAO, Rome AQUACULTURE CENTRES (E-mail: [email protected]) IN ASIA-PACIFIC C A A N Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations A F O F S I I A N T P A The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or of the Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pa- cific (NACA) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its fron- tiers or boundaries. ISBN 92-5-104620-4 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Understanding Toxic Cyanobacteria and Cochlodinium Polykrikoides Blooms in Suffolk County
    MONITORING AND UNDERSTANDING TOXIC CYANOBACTERIA AND COCHLODINIUM POLYKRIKOIDES BLOOMS IN SUFFOLK COUNTY A FINAL REPORT BY CHRISTOPHER J. GOBLER, STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 2013 REVISED MAY 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS: Executive Summary……………………………………………………………pages 3- 6 Task 1. – Literature and Regulatory Review…………………………………pages 7 - 14 Task 2. –Summer monitoring of freshwater bathing beach lakes in Suffolk County. Suffolk County Bathing Beaches………………………………….…………pages 15 - 16 Task 3. Seasonal monitoring the most toxic lakes in Suffolk County…..……pages 17 - 25 Task 4. Cyanotoxin findings and final report………………………...…………..pages 26 Task 5 & 6. Assess the ability of Cochlodinium polykrikoides to form cysts; Quantify the production and densities of Cochlodinium polykrikoides cysts before, during and after blooms………………………………………………………………..………pages 27 - 57 Task 7. Assess the temperature tolerance of Cochlodinium polykrikoides….pages 58 - 61 Task 8. Assess the mechanism of toxicity of Cochlodinium polykrikoides....pages 62 - 93 Task 9. Explore the vulnerability of Suffolk County fish populations to Cochlodinium polykrikoides………………………………………………………...………pages 94 - 113 Task 10. Prepare a final report regarding Cochlodinium polykrikoides results….pages 114 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This project, Monitoring and Understanding Toxic Cyanobacteria and Cochlodinium polykrikoides Blooms in Suffolk County, was funded by Suffolk County Capital Project 8224, Harmful Algal Blooms, and was initiated to address ongoing blooms of toxic cyanobacteria and Cochlodinium polykrikoides in Suffolk County waters. Cyanobacteria Cyanobacteria, also known as blue-green algae, are microscopic organisms found in both marine and fresh water environments. Under favorable conditions of sunlight, temperature, and nutrient concentrations, cyanobacteria can form massive blooms that discolor the water and often result in a scums and floating mats on the water’s surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Shellfish Reefs at Risk
    SHELLFISH REEFS AT RISK A Global Analysis of Problems and Solutions Michael W. Beck, Robert D. Brumbaugh, Laura Airoldi, Alvar Carranza, Loren D. Coen, Christine Crawford, Omar Defeo, Graham J. Edgar, Boze Hancock, Matthew Kay, Hunter Lenihan, Mark W. Luckenbach, Caitlyn L. Toropova, Guofan Zhang CONTENTS Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6 Methods .................................................................................................................................... 10 Results ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Condition of Oyster Reefs Globally Across Bays and Ecoregions ............ 14 Regional Summaries of the Condition of Shellfish Reefs ............................ 15 Overview of Threats and Causes of Decline ................................................................ 28 Recommendations for Conservation, Restoration and Management ................ 30 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 36 References .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mercenaria Mercenaria ©
    Mercenaria mercenaria © 16mar2001 Copyright 2001 by Richard Fox Lander University Ph. MOLLUSCA, Cl.Bivalvia, sCl.Heterodonta, O.Veneroida, F.Veneridae Introduction Mollusca The phylum Mollusca is the second largest in the animal kingdom and comprises several classes consisting of the Monoplacophora, Polyplacophora, Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Scaphopoda, Aplacophora, and Cephalopoda. The typical mollusc has a shell, muscular foot, head with mouth and sense organs, and a visceral mass containing most of the gut and the heart, gonads, and kidney. Part of the body is enclosed in a mantle formed of a fold of the body wall. The mantle encloses a space known as the mantle cavity which is filled with water or air and in which the respiratory organs, anus, nephridiopore(s) and gonopore(s) are located. The coelom is reduced to small spaces including the pericardial cavity and gonocoel. The well-developed blood vascular system consists of the heart and vessels leading to a spacious hemocoel in which most of the viscera are located. The kidneys are large metanephridia. Molluscs may be either gonochoristic or hermaphroditic. Spiral cleavage produces a characteristic veliger larva in most groups unless it is suppressed in favor of direct development or another larva. Molluscs are well represented in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial habitats. Bivalvia Bivalvia is a large class of molluscs whose shell is divided into right and left portions. There is usually a crystalline style but never a radula. Bivalves are flattened from side to side and the head is reduced and bears no special sense organs. The large mantle cavity is located on the sides and contains the large gills.
    [Show full text]
  • Relation of Desert Pupfish Abundance to Selected Environmental Variables
    Environmental Biology of Fishes (2005) 73: 97–107 Ó Springer 2005 Relation of desert pupfish abundance to selected environmental variables in natural and manmade habitats in the Salton Sea basin Barbara A. Martin & Michael K. Saiki U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Western Fisheries Research Center-Dixon Duty Station, 6924 Tremont Road, Dixon, CA 95620, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) Received 6 April 2004 Accepted 12 October 2004 Key words: species assemblages, predation, water quality, habitat requirements, ecological interactions, endangered species Synopsis We assessed the relation between abundance of desert pupfish, Cyprinodon macularius, and selected biological and physicochemical variables in natural and manmade habitats within the Salton Sea Basin. Field sampling in a natural tributary, Salt Creek, and three agricultural drains captured eight species including pupfish (1.1% of the total catch), the only native species encountered. According to Bray– Curtis resemblance functions, fish species assemblages differed mostly between Salt Creek and the drains (i.e., the three drains had relatively similar species assemblages). Pupfish numbers and environmental variables varied among sites and sample periods. Canonical correlation showed that pupfish abundance was positively correlated with abundance of western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis, and negatively correlated with abundance of porthole livebearers, Poeciliopsis gracilis, tilapias (Sarotherodon mossambica and Tilapia zillii), longjaw mudsuckers, Gillichthys mirabilis, and mollies (Poecilia latipinna and Poecilia mexicana). In addition, pupfish abundance was positively correlated with cover, pH, and salinity, and negatively correlated with sediment factor (a measure of sediment grain size) and dissolved oxygen. Pupfish abundance was generally highest in habitats where water quality extremes (especially high pH and salinity, and low dissolved oxygen) seemingly limited the occurrence of nonnative fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Scacchi, Species Solecurtidae
    BASTERIA, 58: 35-40, 1994 Solecurtus multistriatus (Scacchi, 1835), a good marine bivalve species from the Mediterranean Sea (Bivalvia, Heterodonta: Solecurtidae) Paolo Mariottini 1 Istituto di Scienze Biochimiche, Universita di Parma, 1-43100 Parma, Italy Carlo Smriglio Via di Valle Aurelia 134, 1-00167 Rome, Italy & Cesare Ciommei Via Montebruno 12, 1-00168 Rome, Italy Solecurtus multistriatus (Scacchi, 1835) from the Mediterranean Sea is here reported as a bona fide species; the authors give additional data about its morphology, ecology and distribution. Key words: Bivalvia, Solecurtidae, Solecurtus, morphology, distribution, Mediterranean Sea, Italy. INTRODUCTION In the Mediterranean Sea the genus Solecurtus Blainville, 1824, is represented by three species: S. scopula (Turton, 1822), S. strigilatus (Linne, 1758) and S. multistriatus (Scacchi, 1835). The last taxon was based by Scacchi (1835) (and not Scacchi, 1834, according to Cretella et ah, 1992) on a fossil specimen collected near Gravina, Puglia (Italy). Here the original description is given: "Testa ovali-oblonga, subaequilatera, antice oblique striata, striis approximatis angulo acuto in/lexis. Lata lin. 8, alta lin. 3". In the description 'lin.' (which stands for linea) is a standard size unit. The one adopted by the authors of that time corresponded to 2.25 mm; but, in this case, it is also possible that 'linea' represents a local Sicilian size unit (1.8 mm) as reported by Giannuzzi-Savelli et al. (1986). The author clearly stated that this species differs from the fossil and Recent specimens of "Solene bianco del Renieri" candidus of S. and of [S. (Renier, 1804), synonym scopula] "Solene strigilato" (S. strigilatus) . Nowadays the status of S.
    [Show full text]
  • Three New Pupfish Species, Cyprinodon (Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae), from Chihuahua, México, and Arizona, USA Author(S): W
    Three New Pupfish Species, Cyprinodon (Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae), from Chihuahua, México, and Arizona, USA Author(s): W. L. Minckley, Robert Rush Miller and Steven Mark Norris Source: Copeia, Vol. 2002, No. 3 (Aug. 15, 2002), pp. 687-705 Published by: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (ASIH) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1448150 . Accessed: 23/07/2014 15:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (ASIH) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Copeia. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.123.44.23 on Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:57:21 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Copeia,2002(3), pp. 687-705 Three New Pupfish Species, Cyprinodon(Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae), from Chihuahua, Mexico, and Arizona, USA W. L. MINCKLEY,ROBERT RUSH MILLER,AND STEVENMARK NORRIS Three new species of Cyprinodon(Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae)are described,each long recognized as distinct. Cyprinodonpisteri occupies a varietyof systems and hab- itats in the Lago de Guzmin complex basin in northern Chihuahua,Mexico. It is distinguishedby its dusky to black dorsal fin and narrowor inconspicuousterminal bar on the caudal fin in mature males.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Variability in Recruitment of an Infaunal Bivalve
    Spatial Variability in Recruitment of an Infaunal Bivalve: Experimental Effects of Predator Exclusion on the Softshell Clam (Mya arenaria L.) along Three Tidal Estuaries in Southern Maine, USA Author(s): Brian F. Beal, Chad R. Coffin, Sara F. Randall, Clint A. Goodenow Jr., Kyle E. Pepperman, Bennett W. Ellis, Cody B. Jourdet and George C. Protopopescu Source: Journal of Shellfish Research, 37(1):1-27. Published By: National Shellfisheries Association https://doi.org/10.2983/035.037.0101 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2983/035.037.0101 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1–27, 2018. SPATIAL VARIABILITY IN RECRUITMENT OF AN INFAUNAL BIVALVE: EXPERIMENTAL EFFECTS OF PREDATOR EXCLUSION ON THE SOFTSHELL CLAM (MYA ARENARIA L.) ALONG THREE TIDAL ESTUARIES IN SOUTHERN MAINE, USA 1,2 3 2 3 BRIAN F.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment for Three Dreissenid Mussels (Dreissena Polymorpha, Dreissena Rostriformis Bugensis, and Mytilopsis Leucophaeata) in Canadian Freshwater Ecosystems
    C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2012/174 Document de recherche 2012/174 National Capital Region Région de la capitale nationale Risk Assessment for Three Dreissenid Évaluation des risques posés par trois Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha, espèces de moules dreissénidées Dreissena rostriformis bugensis, and (Dreissena polymorpha, Dreissena Mytilopsis leucophaeata) in Canadian rostriformis bugensis et Mytilopsis Freshwater Ecosystems leucophaeata) dans les écosystèmes d'eau douce au Canada Thomas W. Therriault1, Andrea M. Weise2, Scott N. Higgins3, Yinuo Guo1*, and Johannie Duhaime4 Fisheries & Oceans Canada 1Pacific Biological Station 3190 Hammond Bay Road, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7 2Institut Maurice-Lamontagne 850 route de la Mer, Mont-Joli, QC G5H 3Z48 3Freshwater Institute 501 University Drive, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N6 4Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 867 Lakeshore Road, PO Box 5050, Burlington, Ontario L7R 4A6 * YMCA Youth Intern This series documents the scientific basis for the La présente série documente les fondements evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in scientifiques des évaluations des ressources et des Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the écosystèmes aquatiques du Canada. Elle traite des day in the time frames required and the problèmes courants selon les échéanciers dictés. documents it contains are not intended as Les documents qu‟elle contient ne doivent pas être definitive statements on the subjects addressed considérés comme des énoncés définitifs sur les but rather as progress reports on ongoing sujets traités, mais plutôt comme des rapports investigations. d‟étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the official Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans la language in which they are provided to the langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit envoyé au Secretariat.
    [Show full text]
  • Molluscs (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora)
    Gulf of Mexico Science Volume 34 Article 4 Number 1 Number 1/2 (Combined Issue) 2018 Molluscs (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora) of Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas, Mexico: Spatial and Temporal Distribution Martha Reguero Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Andrea Raz-Guzmán Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México DOI: 10.18785/goms.3401.04 Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/goms Recommended Citation Reguero, M. and A. Raz-Guzmán. 2018. Molluscs (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora) of Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas, Mexico: Spatial and Temporal Distribution. Gulf of Mexico Science 34 (1). Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/goms/vol34/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf of Mexico Science by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reguero and Raz-Guzmán: Molluscs (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora) of Lagu Gulf of Mexico Science, 2018(1), pp. 32–55 Molluscs (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Polyplacophora) of Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas, Mexico: Spatial and Temporal Distribution MARTHA REGUERO AND ANDREA RAZ-GUZMA´ N Molluscs were collected in Laguna Madre from seagrass beds, macroalgae, and bare substrates with a Renfro beam net and an otter trawl. The species list includes 96 species and 48 families. Six species are dominant (Bittiolum varium, Costoanachis semiplicata, Brachidontes exustus, Crassostrea virginica, Chione cancellata, and Mulinia lateralis) and 25 are commercially important (e.g., Strombus alatus, Busycoarctum coarctatum, Triplofusus giganteus, Anadara transversa, Noetia ponderosa, Brachidontes exustus, Crassostrea virginica, Argopecten irradians, Argopecten gibbus, Chione cancellata, Mercenaria campechiensis, and Rangia flexuosa).
    [Show full text]