DOCSLIB.ORG

The Reluctant Pillar: New York and the Adoption of the Federal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Reluctant Pillar: New York and the Adoption of the Federal ED 345 999 SO 022 150 AUTHOR Schechter, Stephen L., Ed. TITLE The Reluctant Pillars New York and the Adoption of the Federal Constitution. INSTITUTION Russell Sage Coll., Troy, NY. SPONS AGENCY National Endowment for the Humanities (NFAH). Washington, D.C. REPORT NO ISBN-0-930309-00-6 PUB DATE 85 NOTE 272p. AVAILABLE FROMCouncil for Citizenship Education, Russell Sage College, Troy, NY 12180 ($8). PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Collected Works - General (020) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Constitutional History; *Constitutional Law; Educational Resources; Political Science; Politics; *State History; United States History IDENTIFIERS *New York; *United States Constitution ABSTRACT This collection of essays is intended for both the general reader and the specialist and is designed to provide the basic elements needed for an introductory survey and a reference aid to the role of New York State in the adoption of the federal Constitution. The collection is organized into five sections: theory, history, materials, people and places, and chronologies. The essays includes "The U.S. Constitution and the American Tradition of Constitution-Naking" (Daniel J. Elazar); "The Ends of Federalism" (Martin Diamond). "The Constitution of the United States: The End of the Revolution" (Richard Leffler); "New York: The Reluctant Pillar" (John P. Kaminski); "A Guide to Sources for Studying the Ratification of the Constitution by New York State" (Gaspare J. Saladino); "Fiction--Another Source" (Jack VanDerhoof); "A Biographical Gazetteer of New York Federalists and Antifederalists" (Stephen L. Schechter); "A Preliminary Inventory of the Homes of New York Federalists and Antifederaliste (Stephen L. Schechter); and "A Guide to Historic Sites of the Ratification Debate in New 'fork" (Stephen L. Schechter). The volume concludes with two chronologies, entitled respectively: "A Chronology of Constitutional Events during the American Revolutionary Era, 1774-1792"; and "A Chronology of New York Events, 1777-1788." (DB) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** **PERMISSION TO REPRODUCETHIS ONSIRRTNINT OP MOM= MATERIAL IN MICROFICHEONLY OMNI 1:4 Educational Nonalet and Imenwenwolt HAS BEEN GRANTEDBY EDUCATKINAS. Rgsffit.ffitcos INFORVAVON CENTER (ERIC) doctiment two been reproduged as ej-tS41 YI:Peved boo the person at amazon:* anoinsbne ft c tvri. Maw cnongeor hem beim made to "Wore roproductio quaNy TO THE EDUCATIONALRESOURCES Points& wawa *Demons NOW In ohm ace- (ERIC)." mom clo oat necussity Mammal ofTmIN INFORMATION CENTER CIERT median or policy COPY AY 2 New York State, 1788 Courten of the University of North Carolina Press and KTO THE RELUCTANT PILLAR New York and the Adoptionof the Federal Constitution ,Im STEPHEN L. SCHECHTER Editor Russell Sage College Troy, New York 4 11 The Reluctant Pillar: NMI York and the Adoptionof the Federal Constitution This publication was madepossible, in part, by grants from the National Endowmentfor the Humanities and the Center for the Studyof Federalism, Russell Sage College, Troy, NY12180 Copyright 49 1985 by RussellSage College All rights reserved. Publishedin 1985 Printed in the United Statesof America Map of New York State,1788, adapted from Boyd,Stephen R., the Constitution. The Politics of Opposition:Antifederalists and the Acceptance of Millwood, New York: KTO Press,1979. Reproduced with permission ofthe publisher. and courtesy University ofNorth Carolina Press. Library of Congress Catalogingin Publication Data Main entry under title: The reluctant pillar. Includes index. 1. New York (State)Politicsand government 1775-1865 Addresses, essays. lectures. 2.United StatesConstitutionalhistory Addresses, essays, lectures. I. Schechter, Stephen L.,1945- JK161.N7R45 1985 974.1'03 84-22266 ISBN 0-950309-00-6 Contents Editor's Introduction vii THEORY The U.S. Constitutionand the American Tradition 3 of Constitution-Making by Daniel I Elazar The Ends of Federalism 16 by Martin Diamond HISTORY The Constitution of theUnited States: 24 The End of the Revolution by Richard Leffler 48 New York: The ReluctantPillar by John P. Kaminski MATERIALS A Guide to Sources forStudying the Ratification 118 of the Constitution by NewYork State by Gaspare J. Saladino FictionAnother Source 148 fry Jack VanDerhoof i) PEOPLE AND PLACES A Biographical Gazetteer of New York Federalists 157 and Antifederalists by Stephen L. Schechter A Preliminary Inventory of the Homes of 207 New York Federalists and Antifederalists by Stephen L. Schechter A Guide to Historic Sites of the Ratification Debate 216 in New York by Stephen L. Schechter CHRONOLOGIES A Chronology of Constitutional Events during the 232 American Revolutionary Era, 1774-1792 A Chronology of New York Events, 240 1777-1788 Index 245 Contributors 257 Map: New York in 1788 Frontispiece Introduction New York wasthe eleventh state to ratify the federalConstitution; hardly a memorabledistinaion bring the new Con- in a process thatrequired only nine states to stitution into effect. Whatdistinguishes the role of NewYork in ratified but the debate over theConstitution is not when the state why it waited so long. The most straightforwardexplanation of New York's re- luctance is that both sideshad an interest in the strategyof delay. As the state's minority party,Federalists were in favor oflate elections and a lateconvention in the hopes ofswaying the elec- torate or thedelegates to their side; and,if those efforts failed, there would be no earlynegative vote by New York toembarrass or thwart theirefforts elsewhere. Antifederalistshad their own reasons fordelay, as John P. Kaminskiexplains in his essay. Though astute observers wereplacing their bets on anAntifederalist ma- jority, no good politician(and Governor GeorgeClinton was among the best) feels sanguineabout a sure bet in theworld of politics. Clinton's forces needed time to assesstheir statewide strengthand to organize thediversity of interestsrequired to form a majority in a state like NewYork. There was also thehope that, with time, Antifederalists could build aninterstate movement for asecond to be- constitutional conventionand wait for another large state come the first to say no. ln its barest form,then, New York was areluctant pillar risk an early because its leaders onboth sides were unwilling to decision. Delay was apurely political yet perfectlyhonorable choice and so too were the tacticsof vocal debate and quietorganization. Alexander Hamilton wasneither moralizing norimprovising when have he wrote: "It has beenfrequently remarked, that it seems to been reserved to the peopleof this country, by theirconduct and viii THE RELUCTANT PILLAR example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not, of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend, for their political constitutions, on accident and force." This was the opening salvo of The Federalist No. I, published on 27 October 1787, and its message to the voters of New York was an appeal for time, cast in the language of republican enlighten- ment. About this Publication This collection of essays is intended for both the general reader and the specialist. The collection is organized into five sections: theory; history; materials; people and places; and events. Each section is designed to pave the way for the one that follows, with the overall aim of providing the reader with the basic elements needed for an introductory survey and reference aid to the role of New York in the adoption of the federal Constitution. With the exception of Martin Diamond's essay, all of the contributions were prepared for this collection. In his introductory essay in the first section, Daniel J. Elazar sets out the traditions of American constitution-making and ex- plains how those traditions helped shape the federal Constitution and the process of ratification. Elazar begins with a discussion of constitution-making as an eminently political act and proceeds to unravel the dimensions of modern constitutions, the features of American constitution-making, arts the contributions of the fed- eral Constitution to the modern principle of representation. Draw- ing on The Federalist No. 1, he then identifies three models of f-:onstitution-making and distinguishes the American model and its compact-covenant traditions of choice and consent. Martin Diamond's contribution, reprinted from one of his earlier works, offers a perspective of political thought often m;ss- ing from standard histories of the ratification debate. He believes that the most important difference between Federalists and Anti- federalists concerns their expectations of what ends a republic should serve and how those ends could best be achieved. In the elegant prose of a philosopher, Diamond argues that Antifeder- alists operated on the basis of a classic "small republic" conception of society, in which citizen virtue and freedom from despotic rule were maintained by the very smallness of the country and pro- Introduction ix tected by a federal alliancemuch like that envisioned in the Ar- ticles of Confederation. By contrast,Federalists sought an ex- tended and compound republic asthe best safeguard of republican freedom and virtue, and, in breakingwith the past, they forever changed the meaning of federalism(then understood
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Revolutionary Movement in New York, 1773–1777
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge United States History History 1966 The Road to Independence: The Revolutionary Movement in New York, 1773–1777 Bernard Mason State University of New York at Binghamton Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Mason, Bernard, "The Road to Independence: The Revolutionary Movement in New York, 1773–1777" (1966). United States History. 66. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_united_states_history/66 The 'l(qpd to Independence This page intentionally left blank THE ROAD TO INDEPENDENCE The 'R!_,volutionary ~ovement in :J{£w rork, 1773-1777~ By BERNARD MASON University of Kentucky Press-Lexington 1966 Copyright © 1967 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PRESS) LEXINGTON FoR PERMISSION to quote material from the books noted below, the author is grateful to these publishers: Charles Scribner's Sons, for Father Knickerbocker Rebels by Thomas J. Wertenbaker. Copyright 1948 by Charles Scribner's Sons. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., for John Jay by Frank Monaghan. Copyright 1935 by the Bobbs-Merrill Com­ pany, Inc., renewed 1962 by Frank Monaghan. The Regents of the University of Wisconsin, for The History of Political Parties in the Province of New York J 17 60- 1776) by Carl L. Becker, published by the University of Wisconsin Press. Copyright 1909 by the Regents of the University of Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment: Asset Identification & Characterization
    This Working Draft Submittal is a preliminary draft document and is not to be used as the basis for final design, construction or remedial action, or as a basis for major capital decisions. Please be advised that this document and associated deliverables have not undergone internal reviews by URS. SECTION 3b - RISK ASSESSMENT: ASSET IDENTIFICATION & CHARACTERIZATION SECTION 3b - RISK ASSESSMENT: IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ASSETS Overview An inventory of geo-referenced assets in Rensselaer County has been created in order to identify and characterize property and persons potentially at risk from the identified hazards. Understanding the type and number of hazards that exist in relation to known hazard areas is an important step in the process of formulating the risk assessment and quantifying the vulnerability of the municipalities that make up Rensselaer County. For this plan, six key categories of assets have been mapped and analyzed using GIS data provided by Rensselaer County, with some additional data drawn from other public sources: 1. Improved property: This category includes all developed properties according to parcel data provided by Rensselaer County and equalization rates from the New York State Office of Real Property Services. Impacts to improved properties are presented as a percentage of each community’s total value of improvements that may be exposed to the identified hazards. 2. Emergency facilities: This category covers all facilities dedicated to the management and response of emergency or disaster situations, and includes emergency operations centers (EOCs), fire stations, police stations, ambulance stations, shelters, and hospitals. Impacts to these assets are presented by tabulating the number of each type of facility present in areas that may be exposed to the identified hazards.
    [Show full text]
  • De Witt Clinton and the Origin of the Spoils System in New York
    73] Cornell University Library JK 731.M2 ... De Witt Clinton and the origin of th 3 1924 002 312 662 SlrUDEES IN HISTORY, ECONOMIOS AND PUBLIC LAW EDITED BY THE FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Volume XXVIII] [Number 1 De WITT CLINTON AUD THE ORIGIN OF THE SPOILS SYSTEM IN NEW YORK HOWARD LEE McBAIN, Ph.D., /Sometime Honorary Fellow in Constitutional Lam, Colwmhia Univeriity THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS THE MACMILLAN COMPANY, AGENTS London : P. S. King & Son 1907 THE LIBRARY OF THE NEW YORK STATE SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL AND LABOR RELATIONS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY 1 DeWITT CLINTON AND THE ORIOIN OF THE SPOILS SYSTEM IN NEW YORK Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924002312662 STUDIES IN HISTORY, ECONOMICS AND PUBLIC LAW EDITED BY THE FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Volume XXVIII] [Number 1 De WITT CLINTON AND THE ORIGIN OF THE SPOILS SYSTEM IN NEW YORK HOWARD LEE McBAIN, Ph.D., Sometime Honorary Fellow in Constitutional Law, Colvmhia University THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS THE MACMILLAN COMPANY, AGENTS London : P. S. King & Son 1907 Copyright, 1907, BY HOWARD LEE McBAIN 1 JK 1S) CONTENTS CHAPTER I EARLY PATRONAGE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION PAGE Introduction 11-15 Misrepresentations of DeWitt Clinton's policies 11-12 Sources for study of 12 Plan of present study of New York patronage 13-15 Relation of systems previous to 1801 13 Relation of national systems I3~i5 Washington's policy of patronage 15-25 His problems differ from those of his successors 16-17 His attitude toward anti-adoptionists 17-20 In general 17-18 In Rhode Island 18-20 His consideration of Revolutionary services 20-21 His general principles in making appointments 21-23 Later consideration of politics in cabinet appointments 23-24 His New York appointments—Theory of Hamiltonian influencejrefuted.
    [Show full text]
  • Torrey Source List
    Clarence A Torrey - Genealogy Source List TORREY SOURCE LIST A. Kendrick: Walker, Lawrence W., ―The Kendrick Adams (1926): Donnell, Albert, In Memoriam . (Mrs. Family,‖ typescript (n.p., 1945) Elizabeth (Knight) Janverin Adams) (Newington, N.H., A. L. Usher: unidentified 1926) A. Morgan: Morgan Gen.: Morgan, Appleton, A History Adams-Evarts: Adams, J. M., A History of the Adams and of the Family of Morgan from the Year 1089 to Present Evarts Families (Chatham, N.Y.: Courier Printing, Times by Appleton Morgan, of the Twenty-Seventh 1894) Generation of Cadivor-Fawr (New York: privately Adams-Hastings: Adams, Herbert Baxter, History of the printed, [1902?]) Thomas Adams and Thomas Hastings Families (Amherst, Abbe-Abbey: Abbey, Cleveland, Abbe-Abbey Genealogy: Mass.: privately printed, 1880) In Memory of John Abbe and His Descendants (New Addington: Harris, Thaddeus William, ―Notes on the Haven, Conn.: Tuttle, Morehouse & Taylor, 1916) Addington Family,‖ Register 4 (April 1850) Abbott: Abbott, Lemuel Abijah, Descendants of George Addington (1931): Addington, Hugh Milburn, History of Abbott of Rowley, Mass. of His Joint Descendants with the Addington Family in the United States and England: George Abbott, Sr., of Andover, Mass.; of the Including Many Related Families: A Book of Descendants of Daniel Abbott of Providence, R.I., 2 Compliments (Nickelsville, Va.: Service Printery, 1931) vols. (n.p.: privately printed, 1906) Adgate Anc.: Perkins, Mary E., Old Families of Norwich, Abell: Abell, Horace A., One Branch of the Abell Family Connecticut, MDCLX to MDCCC (Norwich, Conn., Showing the Allied Families (Rochester, N.Y., 1934) 1900) Abington Hist.: Hobart, Benjamin, History of the Town of Agar Anc.: unidentified Abington, Plymouth County, Mass.
    [Show full text]
  • The Albany Rural Cemetery
    <^ » " " .-^ v^'*^ •V,^'% rf>. .<^ 0- ^'' '^.. , "^^^v ^^^os. l.\''' -^^ ^ ./ > ••% '^.-v- .«-<.. ^""^^^ A o. V V V % s^ •;• A. O /"t. ^°V: 9." O •^^ ' » » o ,o'5 <f \/ ^-i^o ^^'\ .' A. Wo ^ : -^^\ °'yi^^ /^\ ^%|^/ ^'%> ^^^^^^ ^0 v^ 4 o .^'' <^. .<<, .>^. A. c /°- • \ » ' ^> V -•'. -^^ ^^ 'V • \ ^^ * vP Si •T'V %^ "<? ,-% .^^ ^0^ ^^n< ' < o ^X. ' vv-ir- •.-.-., ' •0/ ^- .0-' „f / ^^. V ^ A^ »r^. .. -H rr. .^-^ -^ :'0m^', .^ /<g$S])Y^ -^ J-' /. ^V .;••--.-._.-- %^c^ -"-,'1. OV -^^ < o vP b t'' ^., .^ A^ ^ «.^- A ^^. «V^ ,*^ .J." "-^U-o^ =^ -I o >l-' .0^ o. v^' ./ ^^V^^^.'^ -is'- v-^^. •^' <' <', •^ "°o S .^"^ M 'V;/^ • =.«' '•.^- St, ^0 "V, <J,^ °t. A° M -^j' * c" yO V, ' ', '^-^ o^ - iO -7-, .V -^^0^ o > .0- '#-^ / ^^ ' Why seek ye the living among the dead }"—Luke xxiv : s. [By i)ormission of Erastus Dow Palmer.] e»w <:3~- -^^ THE ALBANY RURAL ^ CEMETERY ITS F A3Ts^ 5tw copies printeil from type Copyn.y:ht. 1S92 Bv HKNkv 1*. PiiKi.rs l*lioto>;raphy by l*iiic MarPoiiaUl, Albany Typogrnpliy and Prcsswork by Brnndow l^rintinj; Comimny, Albany ac:knowledgments. rlfIS hook is tlir D/i/i^mio/fi of a proposilioii on lite pari ot the Iriixtccx to piihlisli a brief liislorv of the .llhaiiy Cemetery A ssoeiation, iiieliidiiiQa report of the eonseeration oration, poem and other exercises. It li'as snoocsted that it niioht be well to attempt son/e- thino- more worthy of the object than a mere pamphlet, and this has been done with a result that must spealc for itself. Jl'h/le it would be impi-aclicable to mention here all who have kindly aided in the zvork, the author desi/'cs to express his particular oblioations : To Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • James Sands of Block Island
    HERALDIC DESCRIPTION ARMS: Or, a fesse dancettee between three cross-crosslets fitchee gules. CREST: A griffin segreant per fesse or and gules. MoITo: Probum non poenitet. DESCENDANTS OF JAMES SANDS OF BLOCK ISLAND With notes on the WALKER, HUTCHINSON, RAY, GUTHRIE, PALGRAVE, CORNELL, AYSCOUGH, MIDDAGH, HOLT, AND HENSHAW FAMILIES Compiled by MALCOLM SANDS WILSON Privately Printed New York • 1949 Copyright 1949 by Malcolm Sands Wilson 770 Park Avenue, New York 21, N. Y. All rights reserved PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The William Byrd Press, Inc., Richmond, Virginia Foreword The purpose of this Genealogy of the Sands Family, which is the result of much research, is to put on record a more comprehensive account than any so far published in this country. The "Descent of Comfort Sands & of his Children," by Temple Prime, New York, 1886; and "The Direct Forefathers and All the Descendants of Richardson Sands, etc.," by Benjamin Aymar Sands, New York, 1916, (from both of which volumes I have obtained material) are excellent as far as they go, but their scope is very limited, as was the intention of their com­ pilers. I have not attempted to undertake a full and complete genealogy of this family, but have endeavored to fill certain lines and bring more nearly to date the data collected by the late Fanning C. T. Beck and the late LeBaron Willard, (brother-in-law of my aunt Caroline Sands Willard). I take this opportunity to express my thanks to all members of the family who have rendered cheerful and cooperative assistance. It had been my intention to have a Part II in this volume, in which the English Family of Sands, Sandes, Sandis or Sandys were to have been treated, and where the connecting link between James Sands of Block Island and his English forebears was to be made clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in New York
    Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in New York During the decade preceding the War for Independence, New York was divided into two large provincial factions—the Delanceys and the Livingstons. When independence neared, the Delanceys were in power and they remained loyal to the king. The opposition to British imperial policy consisted of three groups—the radical elements led by New York City mechanics who advocated independence from Great Britain, a very conservative group that wanted reconciliation, and another conservative group that wanted to delay independence but would not give up key colonial rights. Because conservatives controlled the third Provincial Congress, that body gave no instructions on the question of independence to New York’s delegates to the Second Continental Congress meeting in Philadelphia. Not being instructed, the New York delegation, standing alone, did not vote on independence on 2 July 1776. Earlier, in response to the Continental Congress’ resolution of 15 May 1776, the third Provincial Congress had called on the electors in the different counties to elect a fourth provincial congress which might draft a constitution creating a state government. The election took place and the new Provincial Congress on 9 July resolved unanimously to join the other colonies in declaring independence. The next day it renamed itself the Provincial Convention. On 1 August the Convention appointed a committee of thirteen to draft a state constitution and to report by 26 August. The committee did not report until 12 March 1777. After almost six weeks of debate, the Convention on 20 April voted “in the name and by the authority of the good people of this State” to adopt the constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Morris-Jumel Mansion and the American Colonial Revival
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations and Theses City College of New York 2014 Morris-Jumel Mansion and the American Colonial Revival Ken Moss CUNY City College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/258 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Morris-Jumel Mansion and the American Colonial Revival Kenneth Moss Advisor – Professor Gregory Downs May 1, 2011 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts of the City College of the City University of New York. Table of Contents List of Illustrations i Introduction 1 Motivations and the Proprietary Model 18 Objects and Structures 52 Conclusion 72 Bibliography 79 i List of Illustrations Figure 1: Morris-Jumel Mansion, First Floor Hall, 1886. Photograph. Morris-Jumel Mansion, Gladys Brooks Commemorative Archive Figure 2: Washington's Bedroom, circa 1916. Postcard. Morris-Jumel Mansion, Gladys Brooks Commemorative Archive. Figure 3: Jumel Mansion, Dining Room, Circa 1910. Photograph. Morris-Jumel Mansion, Gladys Brooks Commemorative Archive. Introduction On November 19, 1904 an unlikely face-off occurred at the headquarters of the New York City Parks Department, the Arsenal, in Central Park. It was the latest volley in a battle that had raged in government and in the press for more than a year. The decision at hand was so grave it had deadlocked in the New York State legislature with each house supporting a different protagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Story of the Faulkner Murals by Lester S. Gorelic, Ph.D. the Story Of
    The Story of the Faulkner Murals By Lester S. Gorelic, Ph.D. The story of the Faulkner murals in the Rotunda begins on October 23, 1933. On this date, the chief architect of the National Archives, John Russell Pope, recommended the approval of a two- year competing United States Government contract to hire a noted American muralist, Barry Faulkner, to paint a mural for the Exhibit Hall in the planned National Archives Building.1 The recommendation initiated a three-year project that produced two murals, now viewed and admired by more than a million people annually who make the pilgrimage to the National Archives in Washington, DC, to view two of the Charters of Freedom documents they commemorate: the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America. The two-year contract provided $36,000 in costs plus $6,000 for incidental expenses.* The contract ended one year before the projected date for completion of the Archives Building’s construction, providing Faulkner with an additional year to complete the project. The contract’s only guidance of an artistic nature specified that “The work shall be in character with and appropriate to the particular design of this building.” Pope served as the contract supervisor. Louis Simon, the supervising architect for the Treasury Department, was brought in as the government representative. All work on the murals needed approval by both architects. Also, The United States Commission of Fine Arts served in an advisory capacity to the project and provided input critical to the final composition. The contract team had expertise in art, architecture, painting, and sculpture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Weather on Armies During the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 The Force of Nature: The Impact of Weather on Armies during the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T. Engel Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE FORCE OF NATURE: THE IMPACT OF WEATHER ON ARMIES DURING THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1775-1781 By JONATHAN T. ENGEL A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2011 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Jonathan T. Engel defended on March 18, 2011. __________________________________ Sally Hadden Professor Directing Thesis __________________________________ Kristine Harper Committee Member __________________________________ James Jones Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii This thesis is dedicated to the glory of God, who made the world and all things in it, and whose word calms storms. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colonies may fight for political independence, but no human being can be truly independent, and I have benefitted tremendously from the support and aid of many people. My advisor, Professor Sally Hadden, has helped me understand the mysteries of graduate school, guided me through the process of earning an M.A., and offered valuable feedback as I worked on this project. I likewise thank Professors Kristine Harper and James Jones for serving on my committee and sharing their comments and insights.
    [Show full text]
  • American Book-Plates, a Guide to Their Study with Examples;
    BOOK PLATE G i ? Y A 5 A-HZl BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME PROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT "FUND THE GIFT OF Weuru m* Sage 1891 /un^x umtim 1969 MB MAR 2 6 79 Q^tJL Cornell University Library Z994.A5 A42 American book-plates, a guide to their s 3 1924 029 546 540 olin Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029546540 AMERICAN BOOK-PLATES (EX-LIBRIS) j&m. American Book-Plates A Guide to their Study with Examples By Charles Dexter Allen Member Ex-Libris Society London • Member Grolier Club New York Member Connecticut Historical Society Hartford With a Bibliography by Eben Newell Hewins Member Ex-Libris Society Illustrated with many reproductions of rare and interesting book-plates and in the finer editions with many prints from the original coppers both old and recent * ^XSU-- 1 New York • Macmillan and Co. • London Mdcccxciv All rights reserved : A-77<*0T Copyright, 1894, By MACMILLAN AND CO. NotfoootJ JSrniB — Berwick Smith. J. S. Cushing & Co. & Boston, Mass., U.S.A. PREFACE. a ^ew ears Book-plate i, ^ litera- II , i|i|lW|lfl|||| Y ture w*^ ^ ave a ace n tne iiSill illllll P^ ' mWnmi i&lfflBH catalogues of the Libraries, as it now has in those of the dealers in books. The works of the Hon. J. Leicester Warren (Lord de Tabley), Mr. Egerton Castle, and Mr. W. J. Hardy on the English plates, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • At Sag Harbor) Is Called "Bridge Hampton Harbor." 1"His Is the Only Time This Occurs, As Far As Discovered
    SAG HARBOR IN EARLIER DAYS A SERIES OF HISTORICAL SKETCHES OF THE HARBOR AND HAMPTON PORT BY HARRY D. SLEIGHT SAG HARBOR, N. Y. 1930 Two Hundred Copies Printed, and the Type Then Destroyed Printed By THE HAMPTON PRESS Bridgehampton, N. Y. 1930 SAG HARBOR IN EARLIER DAYS In 1711 there is an entry in Town Records of ,South­ ampton in which the Great Meadow (at Sag Harbor) is called "Bridge Hampton Harbor." 1"his is the _only time this occurs, as far as discovered. After the allotment of the Great Meadow, Theophilus Howell busied .himself buying what lands he could at the "Harbor." He bought from Joseph More, the weaver, Lot 2, just "rest of the wharf; from Josiah Halsey, lot 3, next west; from Edmund Howell, meadow . near the Brushy N eek bounded east by woods, north by water and south by highway; of Elisha and Lemuel Howell, part of Lot 2; ,_of John Fordham, gentleman, a piece of Smith's meadow, which Pelletreau says is north of Brushy N eek, but appears to be nearer Ligonef! creek or brook; all of these purchases \;Vere made before 1695. Others who sold lands at Sag Harbor were: John Cooper sells to his father-in-law, Capt. Daniel Sayre, a piece that lies over against the Great Meadow and 20 acres at Hog Neck for 107 pounds. Prices of land have increased in this decade for the date is 1710-11. This is lot 20. The same year Thomas Topping sells to Peter Norris all his right at a place called Great Meadow, bounded north by beach, south and west by woods.
    [Show full text]