Coronary Artery Aneurysms: Outcomes Following Medical, Percutaneous Interventional and Surgical Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coronary Artery Aneurysms: Outcomes Following Medical, Percutaneous Interventional and Surgical Management Open access Coronary artery disease Open Heart: first published as 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001440 on 10 February 2021. Downloaded from Coronary artery aneurysms: outcomes following medical, percutaneous interventional and surgical management Shameer Khubber ,1 Rajdeep Chana,1 Chandramohan Meenakshisundaram,1 Kamal Dhaliwal,1 Mohomed Gad,1 Manpreet Kaur,1 Kinjal Banerjee,2 Beni Rai Verma,1 Shashank Shekhar,1 Muhummad Zia Khan,3 Muhammad Shahzeb Khan ,4 Safi Khan,5 Yasser Sammour,1 Rayji Tsutsui,1 Rishi Puri,1 Ankur Kalra,6 Faisal G Bakaeen,1 Conrad Simpfendorfer,1 Stephen Ellis,1 Douglas Johnston,1 Gosta Pettersson,7 Samir Kapadia1 To cite: Khubber S, Chana R, ABSTRACT Key questions Meenakshisundaram C, et al. Background Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are Coronary artery aneurysms: increasingly diagnosed on coronary angiography; however, outcomes following medical, What is already known about this subject? controversies persist regarding their optimal management. percutaneous interventional and ► Coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) are increasingly surgical management. Open In the present study, we analysed the long- term being diagnosed on coronary angiography. However, Heart 2021;8:e001440. outcomes of patients with CAAs following three different there is paucity of data regarding the long- term doi:10.1136/ management strategies. outcomes of different management strategies in openhrt-2020-001440 Methods We performed a retrospective review of patient patients with CAA. records with documented CAA diagnosis between 2000 What does this study add? Received 7 September 2020 and 2005. Patients were divided into three groups: Our study analysed the long-term MACCE outcomes Revised 23 December 2020 medical management versus percutaneous coronary ► Accepted 2 January 2021 intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting of patients with CAAs who underwent medical (CABG). We analysed the rate of major cardiovascular management versus percutaneous and surgical and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) over a period of 10 interventions. years. How might this impact on clinical practice? Results We identified 458 patients with CAAs (mean http://openheart.bmj.com/ ► Our results will inform clinical decisions regarding © Author(s) (or their age 78±10.5 years, 74.5% men) who received medical employer(s)) 2021. Re- use the selection of management strategies for patients permitted under CC BY- NC. No therapy (N=230) or underwent PCI (N=52) or CABG with CAA and the role of antiplatelet/anticoagulant commercial re- use. See rights (N=176). The incidence of CAAs was 0.7% of the total therapy in this patient cohort. and permissions. Published catheterisation reports. The left anterior descending by BMJ. was the most common coronary artery involved (38%). 1Heart and Vascular Institute, The median follow- up time was 62 months. The total Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, number of MACCE during follow- up was 155 (33.8%); INTRODUCTION Ohio, USA 91 (39.6%) in the medical management group vs 46 The incidence of coronary artery aneurysms 2Department of Internal 1 (26.1%) in the CABG group vs 18 (34.6%) in the PCI group (CAAs) varies from 0.3% to 5.3%. In most on September 27, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Medicine, Geisinger Medical cases, CAAs are asymptomatic. However, when Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, (p=0.02). Kaplan- Meier survival analysis showed that USA CABG was associated with better MACCE- free survival symptomatic, the clinical presentation varies 3Department of Medicine, West (p log- rank=0.03) than medical management. These and is typically dependent on the underlying Virginia University, Morgantown, results were confirmed on univariate Cox regression, but cause, for example, atherosclerotic coronary West Virginia, USA not multivariate regression (OR 0.773 (0.526 to 1.136); 4 artery disease (CAD). More than 80% of Medicine, John H Stroger p=0.19). Both Kaplan- Meier survival and regression CAAs are atherosclerotic in origin.2 3 Other Hospital of Cook County, analyses showed that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) Chicago, Illinois, USA causative factors include Kawasaki disease, and anticoagulation were not associated with significant 5Department of Medicine, connective tissue disorders, congenital Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital, improvement in MACCE rates. anomalies, infection, specific drug reactions, Sayre, Pennsylvania, USA Conclusion Our analysis showed similar long- term trauma or iatrogenic interventions.4 Potential 6 MACCE risks in patients with CAA undergoing medical, Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic, complications of CAAs include thrombosis, Cleveland, Ohio, USA percutaneous and surgical management. Further, DAPT 7 rupture and embolism, which can precipitate Department of Cardiothoracic and anticoagulation were not associated with significant ischaemia or even sudden death.5 Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, benefits in terms of MACCE rates. These results should Cleveland, Ohio, USA be interpreted with caution considering the small size and The management strategies of CAAs include medical (conservative) therapy, Correspondence to potential for selection bias and should be confirmed in Dr Samir Kapadia; kapadis@ large, randomised trials. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ccf. org and surgery. To date, there is no consensus Khubber S, et al. Open Heart 2021;8:e001440. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2020-001440 1 Open Heart Open Heart: first published as 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001440 on 10 February 2021. Downloaded from on the optimal management of CAAs. This is because the natural history and long‐term outcomes of CAAs remain unclear. In the lack of large randomised clinical trials, current recommendations are primarily based on small studies and anecdotal evidence. Further, controver- sies persist regarding the benefits of anticoagulant and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in this patient popu- lation.6 7 In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed the long-term major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) outcomes of patients with CAA who were managed conservatively versus those with PCI or surgical intervention over a 10- year follow- up period. METHODS Patient population This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study at the Cleveland Clinic. All patients whose cardiac catheterisa- tion reports documented a diagnosis of CAA between Figure 1 Patient selection flow diagram. Flow diagram 2000 and 2005 were included in the present study. CAA depicting the inclusion and exclusion criteria for selection of was defined as a localised dilatation of coronary vascular patients with coronary artery aneurysm. lumen with diameter >1.5 times compared with the refer- ence coronary vessel. Patients reported to have ‘ectasia’ (diffuse dilatation of the coronary vessel) and those with Statistical analysis no recorded follow- up after the initial catheterisation Categorical variables were analysed using the Χ2 test and were excluded from the study. The study was reported expressed as frequency and percentage. Continuous according to the guidelines of the Strengthening and variables were analysed using one-way analysis of vari- Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology ance with post- hoc Tukey’s test, wherever appropriate, 8 Statement checklist. and reported as mean±SD. Univariate analysis was done using the OR; the multivariate analysis was done using Data collection the multivariable binary logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier All patients who underwent coronary arteriography curves were used for survival analysis. A p value cut- off http://openheart.bmj.com/ between 2000 and 2005 were eligible. A total of 74 269 of 0.05 was required for statistical significance. SPSS consecutive cardiac catheterisation reports were searched software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, V.24.0, IBM for the word ‘aneurysm’. This strategy retrieved 3333 Corp) was used for data analysis. catheterisation reports, which were further evaluated to exclude patients with aortic, ventricular and sinus of Vals- RESULTS alva aneurysms. A total of 498 patients matched our inclu- Baseline characteristics sion criteria; however, 40 patients were further excluded The current study included 458 patients, divided into due to incomplete chart information or lack of follow-up three groups: 230 (50.2%) patients were managed medi- on September 27, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. after the initial catheterisation (figure 1). cally, 176 (38.4%) underwent coronary artery bypass The baseline patient characteristics, aneurysm anatom- grafting (CABG) and 52 (11.3%) underwent PCI. The ical details, and outcomes were collected by a thorough incidence of CAA was 0.7% of the total catheterisa- review of individual medical charts and cardiac catheteri- tion reports. The mean age of the patient population sation images. Mortality data were obtained from multiple was 78±10.5 years, with a male preponderance (N=341; sources in an additive manner, including the Social Secu- 74.5%). Anginal symptoms were reported in 64% of rity Death Index, State Death Index and public record individuals and 32% had a history of congestive heart searches. For patients who did not have any date of death failure. The details of patient baseline characteristics are on record, the date of last known follow-up was used as mentioned in table 1. the censor date. Coronary anatomy and aneurysms Outcome definitions Atherosclerotic CAD was the most common association The primary MACCE endpoint was a composite of all- with CAA, documented in 421 (91.7%) patients. Other cause death, stroke, unplanned percutaneous
Recommended publications
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome in Young Sub-Saharan Africans: A
    Sarr et al. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2013, 13:118 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/13/118 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Acute coronary syndrome in young Sub-Saharan Africans: A prospective study of 21 cases Moustapha Sarr1, Djibril Mari Ba1, Mouhamadou Bamba Ndiaye1*, Malick Bodian1, Modou Jobe1, Adama Kane1, Maboury Diao1, Alassane Mbaye2, Mouhamadoul Mounir Dia1, Soulemane Pessinaba1, Abdoul Kane2 and Serigne Abdou Ba1 Abstract Background: Coronary heart disease remains the leading cause of death in developed countries. In Africa, the disease continues to rise with varying rates of progression in different countries. At present, there is little available work on its juvenile forms. The objective of this work was to study the epidemiological, clinical and evolutionary aspects of acute coronary syndrome in young Sub-Saharan Africans. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study done at the different departments of cardiology in Dakar. We included all patients of age 40 years and below, and who were admitted for acute coronary syndrome between January 1st, 2005 and July 31st, 2007. We collected and analyzed the epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical and evolutionary data of the patients. Results: Hospital prevalence of acute coronary syndrome in young people was 0.45% (21/4627) which represented 6.8% of all cases of acute coronary syndrome admitted during the same period. There was a strong male predominance with a sex-ratio (M:F) of 6. The mean age of patients was 34 ± 1.9 years (range of 24 and 40 years). The main risk factor was smoking, found in 52.4% of cases and the most common presenting symptom was chest pain found in 95.2% of patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Heart Valve Disease: Mitral and Tricuspid Valves
    Heart Valve Disease: Mitral and Tricuspid Valves Heart anatomy The heart has two sides, separated by an inner wall called the septum. The right side of the heart pumps blood to the lungs to pick up oxygen. The left side of the heart receives the oxygen- rich blood from the lungs and pumps it to the body. The heart has four chambers and four valves that regulate blood flow. The upper chambers are called the left and right atria, and the lower chambers are called the left and right ventricles. The mitral valve is located on the left side of the heart, between the left atrium and the left ventricle. This valve has two leaflets that allow blood to flow from the lungs to the heart. The tricuspid valve is located on the right side of the heart, between the right atrium and the right ventricle. This valve has three leaflets and its function is to Cardiac Surgery-MATRIx Program -1- prevent blood from leaking back into the right atrium. What is heart valve disease? In heart valve disease, one or more of the valves in your heart does not open or close properly. Heart valve problems may include: • Regurgitation (also called insufficiency)- In this condition, the valve leaflets don't close properly, causing blood to leak backward in your heart. • Stenosis- In valve stenosis, your valve leaflets become thick or stiff, and do not open wide enough. This reduces blood flow through the valve. Blausen.com staff-Own work, CC BY 3.0 Mitral valve disease The most common problems affecting the mitral valve are the inability for the valve to completely open (stenosis) or close (regurgitation).
    [Show full text]
  • Coronary Artery Disease
    Coronary Artery Disease INFORMATION GUIDE Other names: Atherosclerosis CAD Coronary heart disease (CHD) Hardening of the arteries Heart disease Ischemic (is-KE-mik) heart disease Narrowing of the arteries The purpose of this guide is to help patients and families find sources of information and support. This list is not meant to be comprehensive, but rather to provide starting points for information seeking. The resources may be obtained at the Mardigian Wellness Resource Center located off the Atrium on Floor 2 of the Cardiovascular Center. Visit our website at http://www.umcvc.org/mardigian-wellness-resource-center and online Information guides at http://infoguides.med.umich.edu/home Books, Brochures, Fact Sheets Michigan Medicine. What is Ischemic Heart Disease and Stroke. http://www.med.umich.edu/1libr/CCG/IHDshort.pdf National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). In Brief: Your Guide to Living Well with Heart Disease. A four-page fact sheet. Available online at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/other/your_guide/living_hd_f s.pdf National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Your Guide to Living Well with Heart Disease. A 68-page booklet is a step-by-step guide to helping people with heart disease make decisions that will protect and improve their lives A printer- friendly version is available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/other/your_guide/living_well. pdf Coronary Artery Disease Page 1 Mardigian Wellness Resource Center Coronary Artery Disease INFORMATION GUIDE Books Bale, Bradley. Beat the Heart Attack Gene: A Revolutionary Plan to Prevent Heart Disease, Stroke and Diabetes. New York, NY: Turner Publishing, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Cardiomegaly with Coronary Artery Histopathology and Its Relationship to Atheroma
    32 Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis Vol.18, No.1 Coronary Histopathology in Cardiomegaly 33 Original Article Association of Cardiomegaly with Coronary Artery Histopathology and its Relationship to Atheroma Richard Everett Tracy Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, USA Aims: Hypertrophied hearts at autopsy often display excessive coronary artery atherosclerosis, but the histopathology of coronary arteries in hearts with and without cardiomegaly has rarely been com- pared. Methods: In this study, forensic autopsies provided hearts with unexplained enlargement plus com- parison specimens. Right coronary artery was opened longitudinally and flattened for formalin fixa- tion and H&E-stained paraffin sections were cut perpendicular to the endothelial surface. The mi- croscopically observed presence or absence of a necrotic atheroma in the specimen was recorded. At multiple sites far removed from any form of atherosclerosis, measurements were taken of intimal thickness, numbers of smooth muscle cells (SMC) and their ratio, the thickness per SMC, averaged over the entire nonatheromatous arterial length. When the mean thickness per SMC exceeded a cer- tain cutoff point, the artery was declared likely to contain a necrotic atheroma. Results: The prevalence of specimens with necrotic atheromas increased stepwise with increasing heart weight, equally with fatal or with incidental cardiomegaly, and equally with hypertension- or obesity-related hypertrophy, rejecting further inclusion of appreciable age, race, or gender effects. The prevalence of specimens with thickness per SMC exceeding the cutoff point was almost always nearly identical to the prevalence of observed necrotic atheroma, showing the two variables to be tightly linked to each other with quantitative consistency across group comparisons of every form.
    [Show full text]
  • The Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting
    CONCISE GUIDANCE Clinical Medicine 2021 Vol 21, No 2: e206–11 The management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: key points from the ESC 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the general and emergency physician Authors: Ramesh NadarajahA and Chris GaleB There have been significant advances in the diagnosis and international decline in mortality rates.2,3 In September 2020, management of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published updated infarction over recent years, which has been reflected in an Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of ACS in patients international decline in mortality rates. This article provides an presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation,4 5 years after overview of the 2020 European Society of Cardiology Clinical the last iteration. ABSTRACT Practice Guidelines for the topic, concentrating on areas relevant The guidelines stipulate a number of updated recommendations to the general or emergency physician. The recommendations (supplementary material S1). The strength of a recommendation and underlying evidence basis are analysed in three key and level of evidence used to justify it are weighted and graded areas: diagnosis (the recommendation to use high sensitivity according to predefined scales (Table 1). This focused review troponin and how to apply it), pathways (the recommendation provides learning points derived from the guidelines in areas to facilitate early invasive coronary angiography to improve relevant to general and emergency physicians, including diagnosis outcomes and shorten hospital stays) and treatment (a (recommendation to use high sensitivity troponin), pathways paradigm shift in the use of early intensive platelet inhibition).
    [Show full text]
  • SIGN 148 • Acute Coronary Syndrome
    SIGN 148 • Acute coronary syndrome A national clinical guideline April 2016 Evidence KEY TO EVIDENCE STATEMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LEVELS OF EVIDENCE 1++ High-quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a very low risk of bias 1+ Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a low risk of bias 1 - Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a high risk of bias High-quality systematic reviews of case-control or cohort studies ++ 2 High-quality case-control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal Well-conducted case-control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the 2+ relationship is causal 2 - Case-control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk that the relationship is not causal 3 Non-analytic studies, eg case reports, case series 4 Expert opinion RECOMMENDATIONS Some recommendations can be made with more certainty than others. The wording used in the recommendations in this guideline denotes the certainty with which the recommendation is made (the ‘strength’ of the recommendation). The ‘strength’ of a recommendation takes into account the quality (level) of the evidence. Although higher-quality evidence is more likely to be associated with strong recommendations than lower-quality evidence, a particular level of quality does not automatically lead to a particular strength of recommendation. Other factors that are taken into account when forming recommendations include: relevance to the NHS in Scotland; applicability of published evidence to the target population; consistency of the body of evidence, and the balance of benefits and harms of the options.
    [Show full text]
  • Heart Failure
    FACT SHEET FOR PATIENTS AND FAMILIES Heart Failure What is it? Enlarged heart Heart failure is a condition in which your heart can’t pump enough blood to meet your body’s needs. Usually, this is because your heart muscle is too weak to “squeeze” out enough blood with each beat. But heart failure can also happen when your heart gets stiff “Normal” heart and can’t fill up with enough blood between each beat. Heart failure is found most often in older people, but it can happen to anyone at any age. It’s a serious condition — and also quite common. Many people with heart failure continue to have a full and active life for many years after their diagnosis. What are the symptoms? Symptoms of heart failure vary based on the type of With heart failure, initial damage weakens the heart failure you have. Common symptoms include: heart muscle. This makes your heart beat faster, and the muscle stretches or thickens. Over time, • Shortness of breath the heart muscle begins to wear out. • Cough • Feeling very tired and weak • Atherosclerosis (coronary artery disease). • Weight gain (from fluid buildup) Atherosclerosis is when the arteries that supply your • Swollen ankles, feet, belly, lower back, and fingers heart with blood become narrowed by fatty plaque • Puffiness or swelling around the eyes buildup. This restricts the amount of oxygen your • Trouble concentrating or remembering heart gets and weakens the muscle. It can also cause a heart attack, which can damage your heart even more. The main cause of heart failure (heart muscle damage and weakness) cannot be cured, but symptoms can be • High blood pressure (hypertension).
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome 1
    Acute Coronary Syndrome 1. Which one of the following is not considered a benefit of Chest Pain Center Accreditation? a. Improved patient outcomes b. Streamlined processes to allow for rapid treatment c. Reduce costs and readmission rates d. All of the above are benefits of Chest Pain Center Accreditation 2. EHAC stands for Early Heart Attack Care? a. True b. False 3. What is the primary cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS)? a. Exercise b. High blood pressure c. Atherosclerosis d. Heart failure 4. Which one of the following is not considered a symptom of ACS? a. Jaw Discomfort b. Abdominal discomfort c. Shortness of breath without chest discomfort d. All of the above are considered symptoms of ACS 5. There are age and gender differences associated with signs and symptoms of ACS? a. True b. False 6. Altered mental status may be a sign of ACS in some individuals? a. True b. False 7. All of the following are considered modifiable risk factors for ACS except: a. Smoking b. Sedentary lifestyle c. Age d. High cholesterol 8. Heart attacks occur immediately and never have warning signs? a. True b. False 9. If someone is having a heart attack, which of the following is the best option for seeking treatment? a. Wait a few hours and see if the symptoms resolve, if they do not, then call your physician b. Drive yourself to the ED. You can get there faster since you know a short-cut c. Call 9-1-1 to activate EMS immediately d. Call a family member or neighbor to drive you to the ED 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Focus on Unstable Angina/Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction R Bugiardini
    729 EDITORIAL Heart: first published as 10.1136/hrt.2004.034546 on 14 June 2004. Downloaded from Risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome: focus on unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction R Bugiardini ............................................................................................................................... Heart 2004;90:729–731. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.034546 Although there have been advances in the management of fashion. Experts in a variety of fields make decisions using a more intuitive process of unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial recognising patterns and applying their own infarction syndromes, the rate of cardiovascular mortality rules. In varying proportions, pathophysiologic after discharge is still unacceptably high. With many reasoning, personal clinical experience, and recent published research each play a role in therapeutic options available, the clinician is challenged to the development of our own clinical rules. This identify the safest and most effective treatment for long term approach may produce incorrect use of tools of survival of each individual patient risk stratifications and inappropriate use of treatment strategies and procedures. However, ........................................................................... errors are more often due to ‘‘failure’’ of the system, not of the doctors. Most errors occur at the transfer of care, and particularly at the transfer from the outpatient to the inpatient ‘‘Simple, but not too simple’’—Albert Einstein sites. There are a number of programs now focusing on errors and strategies to reduce errors welve million individuals in the USA and (GAP, CRUSADE QI, JACHO).5–7 All of these 143 million worldwide have coronary artery programs focus on education of physicians, Tdisease. Two million US patients are better interaction between health care organisa- admitted annually to cardiac care units with tions and physicians, and appropriate use of care acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome
    Acute Coronary Syndrome: Current Treatment TIMOTHY L. SWITAJ, MD, U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School, Fort Sam Houston, Texas SCOTT R. CHRISTENSEN, MD, Martin Army Community Hospital Family Medicine Residency Program, Fort Benning, Georgia DEAN M. BREWER, DO, Guthrie Ambulatory Health Care Clinic, Fort Drum, New York Acute coronary syndrome continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Family physicians need to identify and mitigate risk factors early, as well as recognize and respond to acute coronary syn- drome events quickly in any clinical setting. Diagnosis can be made based on patient history, symptoms, electrocardi- ography findings, and cardiac biomarkers, which delineate between ST elevation myocardial infarction and non–ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Rapid reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the goal with either clinical presentation. Coupled with appropriate medical management, percutaneous coronary interven- tion can improve short- and long-term outcomes following myocardial infarction. If percutaneous coronary interven- tion cannot be performed rapidly, patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction can be treated with fibrinolytic therapy. Fibrinolysis is not recommended in patients with non–ST elevation acute coronary syndrome; therefore, these patients should be treated with medical management if they are at low risk of coronary events or if percutaneous coronary intervention cannot be performed. Post–myocardial infarction care should
    [Show full text]
  • KNOW the FACTS ABOUT Heart Disease
    KNOW THE FACTS ABOUT Heart Disease What is heart disease? Having high cholesterol, high blood pressure, or diabetes also can increase Heart disease is the leading cause of your risk for heart disease. Ask your death in the United States. More than doctor about preventing or treating these 600,000 Americans die of heart disease medical conditions. each year. That’s one in every four deaths in this country.1 What are the signs and symptoms? The term “heart disease” refers to several The symptoms vary depending on the types of heart conditions. The most type of heart disease. For many people, common type is coronary artery disease, chest discomfort or a heart attack is the which can cause heart attack. Other first sign. kinds of heart disease may involve the Someone having a heart attack may valves in the heart, or the heart may not experience several symptoms, including: pump well and cause heart failure. Some people are born with heart disease. l Chest pain or discomfort that doesn’t go away after a few minutes. l Pain or discomfort in the jaw, neck, Are you at risk? or back. Anyone, including children, can l Weakness, light-headedness, nausea develop heart disease. It occurs when (feeling sick to your stomach), or a substance called plaque builds up in a cold sweat. your arteries. When this happens, your arteries can narrow over time, reducing l Pain or discomfort in the arms blood flow to the heart. or shoulder. Smoking, eating an unhealthy diet, and l Shortness of breath. not getting enough exercise all increase If you think that you or someone you your risk for having heart disease.
    [Show full text]
  • SIGN 152 • Cardiac Arrhythmias in Coronary Heart Disease
    www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org Edinburgh Office | Gyle Square |1 South Gyle Crescent | Edinburgh | EH12 9EB Telephone 0131 623 4300 Fax 0131 623 4299 Glasgow Office | Delta House | 50 West Nile Street | Glasgow | G1 2NP Telephone 0141 225 6999 Fax 0141 248 3776 The Healthcare Environment Inspectorate, the Scottish Health Council, the Scottish Health Technologies Group, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and the Scottish Medicines Consortium are key components of our organisation. SIGN 152 • Cardiac arrhythmias in coronary heart disease A national clinical guideline September 2018 Evidence KEY TO EVIDENCE STATEMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LEVELS OF EVIDENCE 1++ High-quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a very low risk of bias 1+ Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a low risk of bias 1 - Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a high risk of bias High-quality systematic reviews of case-control or cohort studies ++ 2 High-quality case-control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal Well-conducted case-control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the 2+ relationship is causal 2 - Case-control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk that the relationship is not causal 3 Non-analytic studies, eg case reports, case series 4 Expert opinion RECOMMENDATIONS Some recommendations can be made with more certainty than others. The wording used in the recommendations in this guideline denotes the certainty with which the recommendation is made (the ‘strength’ of the recommendation).
    [Show full text]