Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Focus on Unstable Angina/Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction R Bugiardini

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Focus on Unstable Angina/Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction R Bugiardini 729 EDITORIAL Heart: first published as 10.1136/hrt.2004.034546 on 14 June 2004. Downloaded from Risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome: focus on unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction R Bugiardini ............................................................................................................................... Heart 2004;90:729–731. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.034546 Although there have been advances in the management of fashion. Experts in a variety of fields make decisions using a more intuitive process of unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial recognising patterns and applying their own infarction syndromes, the rate of cardiovascular mortality rules. In varying proportions, pathophysiologic after discharge is still unacceptably high. With many reasoning, personal clinical experience, and recent published research each play a role in therapeutic options available, the clinician is challenged to the development of our own clinical rules. This identify the safest and most effective treatment for long term approach may produce incorrect use of tools of survival of each individual patient risk stratifications and inappropriate use of treatment strategies and procedures. However, ........................................................................... errors are more often due to ‘‘failure’’ of the system, not of the doctors. Most errors occur at the transfer of care, and particularly at the transfer from the outpatient to the inpatient ‘‘Simple, but not too simple’’—Albert Einstein sites. There are a number of programs now focusing on errors and strategies to reduce errors welve million individuals in the USA and (GAP, CRUSADE QI, JACHO).5–7 All of these 143 million worldwide have coronary artery programs focus on education of physicians, Tdisease. Two million US patients are better interaction between health care organisa- admitted annually to cardiac care units with tions and physicians, and appropriate use of care acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The number of pathways. hospital admission for patients with unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial http://heart.bmj.com/ infarction (UN/NSTEMI) is greater than the SCORES TO PREDICT IN-HOSPITAL RISK number with ST elevation myocardial infarction: Scores represent a simple, convenient method of 600 000 and 1.4 million, respectively.1 risk stratification, in which a number of inde- Extensive clinical trial data have provided pendent risk factors on presentation are shown substantial evidence to develop guidelines for to have prognostic significance. Independent risk risk stratification of UA/NSTEMI.23 However, factors may not necessarily represent ‘‘indepen- short term mortality in clinical trials is approxi- dent’’ pathophysiologic processes. Regression modelling techniques for prognostic analysis mately 2% compared with 4–5% mortality in on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. clinical practice.4 The gap between today’s can be enhanced by the use of indexes that knowledge in terms of volume of studies and combine several clinical variables measuring guidelines and their application may provide different aspects of the same underlying patho- only a partial explanation for the difference. physiologic phenomenon. For example, the Guidelines are prepared for physicians practising presence of high troponin T concentrations, in primary and secondary centres, in most congestive heart failure, low left ventricular of which an invasive therapy is available. ejection fraction, history of myocardial infarc- Guidelines are based on results of clinical trials. tion, and Q waves on ECG all measure different Patient enrolment in clinical trials is extremely aspects of the extent of myocardial damage. selective. There are few women, patients are Placing each of these variables separately in a relatively young, and few patients have diabetes, stepwise regression analysis might overlook the heart failure or prior revascularisation. The full importance of myocardial damage as a overall consequence is that clinical trial guide- prognostic factor. A clinical index that combines lines could not mimic actual clinical practice. We the information provided from several related ....................... need systems to minimise errors, to provide variables is a more powerful prognostic factor simple clinical models and scores to predict in- than any individual variable. Correspondence to: hospital risk, comparative studies to support R Bugiardini, MD, choices between alternative strategies, and eva- Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Cardioangiologia, luation of the impact of prognostic indexes on Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndromes; Epatologia, University of patient long term outcome. GRACE, global registry of acute coronary events; Bologna, Via Massarenti 9 PURSUIT, platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina: - 40138 Bologna – Italy; receptor suppression using Integrilin therapy; TIMI, raffaele.bugiardini@ SOURCES OF ERROR thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; UA/STEMI, unibo.it Although applying guidelines is highly rational, unstable angina/non-ST- segment elevation myocardial ....................... clinicians do not often make decisions in this infarction www.heartjnl.com 730 Editorial The three major determinants of prognosis in ACS include: best therapeutic strategy. In this issue of Heart, Nørgaard and (1) the extent of myocardial injury; (2) the extent of coronary colleagues16 provide further information in this area. They artery disease; and (3) the instability of the disease and its followed patients admitted with diagnosis of UA/NSTEMI for Heart: first published as 10.1136/hrt.2004.034546 on 14 June 2004. Downloaded from refractoriness to management. The GRACE and PURSUIT a median of 28 months. Independent predictors of cardiac scores are prominent examples of scoring systems that give death and acute myocardial infarction were age . 65 years, an overview of myocardial injury.89These scores provided an previous myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, ST excellent ability to assess risk for in-hospital and short term segment shifts at 24 hour ECG recording, and troponin T. mortality. Age, Killip class, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, They estimated the probability of a patient being alive at any ST segment deviation, resuscitation from cardiac arrest, point in time after study entry. The prognostic value of serum creatinine concentration, and raised cardiac enzymes transient ST segment shifts was confined to the medium term were powerful predictors of prognosis in almost all patients. outcome (1–4 months). Troponin T provided long term The TIMI risk score seems to look more at the extent of prognostic information above and beyond conventional coronary artery disease and its instability.10 Seven indepen- clinical risk markers such as previous myocardial infarction dent predictor variables were identified: age . 65 years, three and congestive heart failure. cardiovascular risk factors, known coronary artery disease Data imply plausible pathogenetic mechanisms that fit (50% stenosis), severe anginal symptoms (two episodes in with the widely accepted notion of the disease. ST segment preceding 24 hours), use of aspirin in the last seven days, ST shifts could reflect instability where persistence of acute segment deviation . 0.05 mV, and elevated serum cardiac stimuli may cause waxing and waning of intracoronary markers of necrosis. thrombosis and related transient myocardial ischaemia. High The advantage of these scoring systems is that they troponin values could correlate with both myocardial injury summarise important prognostic information of the disease and extent of coronary disease.17 in a single number, confidence limits can be easily calculated, Effective therapeutic options for ACS are costly. We need and survival rates can be easily compared between given studies to support choices. There is no consensus on how the treatments. long term use of many drugs should be undertaken. The link between ST segment shifts and medium term outcome could PROGNOSTIC INDEXES OF LONG TERM OUTCOME give insights into this matter. Detection of unstable patients A major issue in the management of ACS is the risk as well as of a specific vulnerable period of time might be a stratification of those individuals who have survived the rationale for the use of new, costly, potent antiplatelet and initial hospital admission without acute myocardial infarc- anti-inflammatory drugs in this setting. tion, and are being prepared for discharge. Despite a substantial improvement in intra-hospital assessment and CONCLUSIONS care, patients still have a considerably high incidence of Substantial advances in the management of UA/NSTEMI medium to long term adverse outcomes. The risk continues to syndromes have occurred in the last decade. A disturbing increase for at least 3–4 years after an episode of unstable note, however, is the recognition that the rate of cardiovas- syndromes.11 Death may range from 1.7% after one month to cular mortality after discharge is still unacceptably high. With 9.5% after two years. Current areas of research try to address many therapeutic options available, the clinician is chal- 11–13 this issue. C reactive protein, troponin T, heart rate, ST lenged to identify the safest and most effective treatment for http://heart.bmj.com/ segment depression on standard ECG, diabetes, congestive long term survival of each individual patient. Steps in this heart failure, creatinine clearance,
Recommended publications
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome in Young Sub-Saharan Africans: A
    Sarr et al. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2013, 13:118 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/13/118 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Acute coronary syndrome in young Sub-Saharan Africans: A prospective study of 21 cases Moustapha Sarr1, Djibril Mari Ba1, Mouhamadou Bamba Ndiaye1*, Malick Bodian1, Modou Jobe1, Adama Kane1, Maboury Diao1, Alassane Mbaye2, Mouhamadoul Mounir Dia1, Soulemane Pessinaba1, Abdoul Kane2 and Serigne Abdou Ba1 Abstract Background: Coronary heart disease remains the leading cause of death in developed countries. In Africa, the disease continues to rise with varying rates of progression in different countries. At present, there is little available work on its juvenile forms. The objective of this work was to study the epidemiological, clinical and evolutionary aspects of acute coronary syndrome in young Sub-Saharan Africans. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study done at the different departments of cardiology in Dakar. We included all patients of age 40 years and below, and who were admitted for acute coronary syndrome between January 1st, 2005 and July 31st, 2007. We collected and analyzed the epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical and evolutionary data of the patients. Results: Hospital prevalence of acute coronary syndrome in young people was 0.45% (21/4627) which represented 6.8% of all cases of acute coronary syndrome admitted during the same period. There was a strong male predominance with a sex-ratio (M:F) of 6. The mean age of patients was 34 ± 1.9 years (range of 24 and 40 years). The main risk factor was smoking, found in 52.4% of cases and the most common presenting symptom was chest pain found in 95.2% of patients.
    [Show full text]
  • J Wave and Cardiac Death in Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction
    ORIGINAL ARTICLES Arrhythmia 2015;16(2):67-77 J Wave and Cardiac Death in Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction Myung-Jin Cha, MD; Seil Oh, MD, ABSTRACT PhD, FHRS Background and Objectives: The clinical significance of J wave Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University presentation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients remains Hospital, Seoul, Korea unclear. We hypothesized that J wave appearance in the inferior leads and/or reversed-J (rJ) wave in leads V1-V3 is associated with poor prognosis in inferior-wall AMI patients. Subject and Methods: We enrolled 302 consecutive patients with inferior-wall AMI who were treated with percutaneous coronary in- tervention (PCI). Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on electrocardiograms before and after PCI: the J group (J waves in in- ferior leads and/or rJ waves in leads V1-V3) and the non-J group (no J wave in any of the 12 leads). We compared patients with high am- plitude (>2 mV) J or rJ waves (big-J group) with the non-J group. The cardiac and all-cause mortality at 6 months and post-PCI ventricular arrhythmic events ≤48 hours after PCI were analyzed. Results: A total of 29 patients (including 19 cardiac death) had died. Although all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the post-PCI J group than in the non-J group (p=0.001, HR=5.38), there was no difference between the groups in cardiac mortality. When compar- ing the post-PCI big-J group with the non-J group, a significant dif- ference was found in all-cause mortality (n=29, p=0.032, HR=5.4) and cardiac mortality (n=19, p=0.011, HR=32.7).
    [Show full text]
  • Unstable Angina with Tachycardia: Clinical and Therapeutic Implications
    Unstable angina with tachycardia: Clinical and therapeutic implications We prospectively evaluated 19 patients with prolonged chest pain not evolving to myocardiai infarction and accompanied with reversible ST-T changes and tachycardia (heart rate >lOO beats/min) in order to correlate heart rate reduction with ischemic electrocardiographic (ECG) changes. Fourteen patients (74%) received previous long-term combined treatment with nifedipine and nitrates. Continuous ECG monitoring was carried out until heart rate reduction and at least one of the following occurred: (1) relief of pain or (2) resolution of ischemic ECG changes. The study protocol consisted of carotid massage in three patients (IS%), intravenous propranolol in seven patients (37%), slow intravenous amiodarone infusion in two patients (lo%), and intravenous verapamil in four patients (21%) with atrial fibrillation. In three patients (16%) we observed a spontaneous heart rate reduction on admission. Patients responded with heart rate reduction from a mean of 126 + 10.4 beats/min to 64 k 7.5 beats/min (p < 0.005) and an ST segment shift of 4.3 k 2.13 mm to 0.89 k 0.74 mm (p < 0.005) within a mean interval of 13.2 + 12.7 minutes. Fifteen (79%) had complete response and the other four (21%) had partial relief of pain. A significant direct correlation was observed for heart rate reduction and ST segment deviation (depression or elevation) (f = 0.7527 and 0.8739, respectively). These patients represent a unique subgroup of unstable angina, in which the mechanism responsible for ischemia is excessive increase in heart rate. Conventional vasodilator therapy may be deleterious, and heart rate reduction Is mandatory.
    [Show full text]
  • The J Wave of the ECG. Concepts Compiled by Dr
    The J wave of the ECG. Concepts Compiled by Dr. Andrés R. Pérez Riera The J wave is a positive deflection in the ECG normal (present in 2%–14% of healthy individuals and is more prevalent in young males, particularly if athletic and African descent. Additionally, ERP is a common finding in young teen athletes (the prevalence in the athletic population rises to 20-90%.).1 In this population ERP in both inferior and lateral leads is more common (18.2%) than isolated inferior (9.1%) or lateral (8.2%) ERP. Young age might be a contributing factor in causing a more diffuse repolarization abnormality. 2 or pathological that occurs approximately (There is an overlap of ≈10 msec. 3) after the junction between the end of the QRS complex and the beginning of the ST segment, also known as the J point (junction point), QRS end, J-junction, ST0 [zero millisecond] or ST beginning to occur after the notch/slur or J wave 4. It is described as J deflection as slurring/lambda 5 or notching of the terminal portion of QRS complex. Currently, J waves, is defined as an elevation of the QRS-ST junction ≥1 mm either as QRS slurring or notching in at least 2 contiguous leads. Additionally, when it becomes more accentuated, it may appear as a small, R wave (R′) or ST segment elevation. The term J deflection or J-wave has been used to designate the formation of the wave produced when there is a large, prominent deviation of the J point from the baseline with two shapes: notching/spike-and- slurring/lambda 5 or dome 6 variety.
    [Show full text]
  • The Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting
    CONCISE GUIDANCE Clinical Medicine 2021 Vol 21, No 2: e206–11 The management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: key points from the ESC 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the general and emergency physician Authors: Ramesh NadarajahA and Chris GaleB There have been significant advances in the diagnosis and international decline in mortality rates.2,3 In September 2020, management of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published updated infarction over recent years, which has been reflected in an Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of ACS in patients international decline in mortality rates. This article provides an presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation,4 5 years after overview of the 2020 European Society of Cardiology Clinical the last iteration. ABSTRACT Practice Guidelines for the topic, concentrating on areas relevant The guidelines stipulate a number of updated recommendations to the general or emergency physician. The recommendations (supplementary material S1). The strength of a recommendation and underlying evidence basis are analysed in three key and level of evidence used to justify it are weighted and graded areas: diagnosis (the recommendation to use high sensitivity according to predefined scales (Table 1). This focused review troponin and how to apply it), pathways (the recommendation provides learning points derived from the guidelines in areas to facilitate early invasive coronary angiography to improve relevant to general and emergency physicians, including diagnosis outcomes and shorten hospital stays) and treatment (a (recommendation to use high sensitivity troponin), pathways paradigm shift in the use of early intensive platelet inhibition).
    [Show full text]
  • SIGN 148 • Acute Coronary Syndrome
    SIGN 148 • Acute coronary syndrome A national clinical guideline April 2016 Evidence KEY TO EVIDENCE STATEMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LEVELS OF EVIDENCE 1++ High-quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a very low risk of bias 1+ Well-conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a low risk of bias 1 - Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a high risk of bias High-quality systematic reviews of case-control or cohort studies ++ 2 High-quality case-control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal Well-conducted case-control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the 2+ relationship is causal 2 - Case-control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk that the relationship is not causal 3 Non-analytic studies, eg case reports, case series 4 Expert opinion RECOMMENDATIONS Some recommendations can be made with more certainty than others. The wording used in the recommendations in this guideline denotes the certainty with which the recommendation is made (the ‘strength’ of the recommendation). The ‘strength’ of a recommendation takes into account the quality (level) of the evidence. Although higher-quality evidence is more likely to be associated with strong recommendations than lower-quality evidence, a particular level of quality does not automatically lead to a particular strength of recommendation. Other factors that are taken into account when forming recommendations include: relevance to the NHS in Scotland; applicability of published evidence to the target population; consistency of the body of evidence, and the balance of benefits and harms of the options.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome 1
    Acute Coronary Syndrome 1. Which one of the following is not considered a benefit of Chest Pain Center Accreditation? a. Improved patient outcomes b. Streamlined processes to allow for rapid treatment c. Reduce costs and readmission rates d. All of the above are benefits of Chest Pain Center Accreditation 2. EHAC stands for Early Heart Attack Care? a. True b. False 3. What is the primary cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS)? a. Exercise b. High blood pressure c. Atherosclerosis d. Heart failure 4. Which one of the following is not considered a symptom of ACS? a. Jaw Discomfort b. Abdominal discomfort c. Shortness of breath without chest discomfort d. All of the above are considered symptoms of ACS 5. There are age and gender differences associated with signs and symptoms of ACS? a. True b. False 6. Altered mental status may be a sign of ACS in some individuals? a. True b. False 7. All of the following are considered modifiable risk factors for ACS except: a. Smoking b. Sedentary lifestyle c. Age d. High cholesterol 8. Heart attacks occur immediately and never have warning signs? a. True b. False 9. If someone is having a heart attack, which of the following is the best option for seeking treatment? a. Wait a few hours and see if the symptoms resolve, if they do not, then call your physician b. Drive yourself to the ED. You can get there faster since you know a short-cut c. Call 9-1-1 to activate EMS immediately d. Call a family member or neighbor to drive you to the ED 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome
    Acute Coronary Syndrome: Current Treatment TIMOTHY L. SWITAJ, MD, U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School, Fort Sam Houston, Texas SCOTT R. CHRISTENSEN, MD, Martin Army Community Hospital Family Medicine Residency Program, Fort Benning, Georgia DEAN M. BREWER, DO, Guthrie Ambulatory Health Care Clinic, Fort Drum, New York Acute coronary syndrome continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Family physicians need to identify and mitigate risk factors early, as well as recognize and respond to acute coronary syn- drome events quickly in any clinical setting. Diagnosis can be made based on patient history, symptoms, electrocardi- ography findings, and cardiac biomarkers, which delineate between ST elevation myocardial infarction and non–ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Rapid reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the goal with either clinical presentation. Coupled with appropriate medical management, percutaneous coronary interven- tion can improve short- and long-term outcomes following myocardial infarction. If percutaneous coronary interven- tion cannot be performed rapidly, patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction can be treated with fibrinolytic therapy. Fibrinolysis is not recommended in patients with non–ST elevation acute coronary syndrome; therefore, these patients should be treated with medical management if they are at low risk of coronary events or if percutaneous coronary intervention cannot be performed. Post–myocardial infarction care should
    [Show full text]
  • Angina: Contemporary Diagnosis and Management Thomas Joseph Ford ‍ ‍ ,1,2,3 Colin Berry ‍ ‍ 1
    Education in Heart CHRONIC ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE Heart: first published as 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314661 on 12 February 2020. Downloaded from Angina: contemporary diagnosis and management Thomas Joseph Ford ,1,2,3 Colin Berry 1 1BHF Cardiovascular Research INTRODUCTION Learning objectives Centre, University of Glasgow Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) remains the leading College of Medical Veterinary global cause of death and lost life years in adults, and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK ► Around one half of angina patients have no 2 notably in younger (<55 years) women.1 Angina Department of Cardiology, obstructive coronary disease; many of these Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New pectoris (derived from the Latin verb ‘angere’ to patients have microvascular and/or vasospastic South Wales, Australia strangle) is chest discomfort of cardiac origin. It is a 3 angina. Faculty of Health and Medicine, common clinical manifestation of IHD with an esti- The University of Newcastle, ► Tests of coronary artery function empower mated prevalence of 3%–4% in UK adults. There Newcastle, NSW, Australia clinicians to make a correct diagnosis (rule- in/ are over 250 000 invasive coronary angiograms rule- out), complementing coronary angiography. Correspondence to performed each year with over 20 000 new cases of ► Physician and patient education, lifestyle, Dr Thomas Joseph Ford, BHF angina. The healthcare resource utilisation is appre- medications and revascularisation are key Cardiovascular Research Centre, ciable with over 110 000 inpatient episodes each aspects of management. University of Glasgow College year leading to substantial associated morbidity.2 In of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow G128QQ, UK; 1809, Allen Burns (Lecturer in Anatomy, Univer- tom.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronary Artery Disease Management
    HealthPartners Inspire® Special Needs Basic Care Clinical Care Planning and Resource Guide CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE MANAGEMENT The following Evidence Base Guideline was used in developing this clinical care guide: National Institute of Health (NIH); American Heart Association (AHA) Documented Health Condition: Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Heart Disease, Heart Disease What is Coronary Artery Disease? Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a disease in which a waxy substance called plaque builds up inside the coronary arteries. These arteries supply oxygen‐rich blood to your heart muscle. When plaque builds up in the arteries, the condition is called atherosclerosis (ATH‐er‐o‐skler‐O‐sis). The buildup of plaque occurs over many years. Over time, plaque can harden or rupture (break open). Hardened plaque narrows the coronary arteries and reduces the flow of oxygen‐rich blood to the heart. If the plaque ruptures, a blood clot can form on its surface. A large blood clot can mostly or completely block blood flow through a coronary artery. Over time, ruptured plaque also hardens and narrows the coronary arteries. Common Causes of Coronary Artery Disease? If the flow of oxygen‐rich blood to your heart muscle is reduced or blocked, angina or a heart attack can occur. Angina is chest pain or discomfort. It may feel like pressure or squeezing in your chest. The pain also can occur in your shoulders, arms, neck, jaw, or back. Angina pain may even feel like indigestion. A heart attack occurs if the flow of oxygen‐rich blood to a section of heart muscle is cut off. If blood flow isn’t restored quickly, the section of heart muscle begins to die.
    [Show full text]
  • Cardiology 1
    Cardiology 1 SINGLE BEST ANSWER (SBA) a. Sick sinus syndrome b. First-degree AV block QUESTIONS c. Mobitz type 1 block d. Mobitz type 2 block 1. A 19-year-old university rower presents for the pre- e. Complete heart block Oxford–Cambridge boat race medical evaluation. He is healthy and has no significant medical history. 5. A 28-year-old man with no past medical history However, his brother died suddenly during football and not on medications presents to the emergency practice at age 15. Which one of the following is the department with palpitations for several hours and most likely cause of the brother’s death? was found to have supraventricular tachycardia. a. Aortic stenosis Carotid massage was attempted without success. b. Congenital long QT syndrome What is the treatment of choice to stop the attack? c. Congenital short QT syndrome a. Intravenous (IV) lignocaine d. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) b. IV digoxin e. Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome c. IV amiodarone d. IV adenosine 2. A 65-year-old man presents to the heart failure e. IV quinidine outpatient clinic with increased shortness of breath and swollen ankles. On examination his pulse was 6. A 75-year-old cigarette smoker with known ischaemic 100 beats/min, blood pressure 100/60 mmHg heart disease and a history of cardiac failure presents and jugular venous pressure (JVP) 10 cm water. + to the emergency department with a 6-hour history of The patient currently takes furosemide 40 mg BD, increasing dyspnoea. His ECG shows a narrow complex spironolactone 12.5 mg, bisoprolol 2.5 mg OD and regular tachycardia with a rate of 160 beats/min.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventricular Tachycardia Associated Syncope in a Patient of Variant
    Case Report http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2016.46.1.102 Print ISSN 1738-5520 • On-line ISSN 1738-5555 Korean Circulation Journal Ventricular Tachycardia Associated Syncope in a Patient of Variant Angina without Chest Pain Soo Jin Kim, MD, Ji Young Juong, MD, and Tae-Ho Park, MD Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, Korea A 68-year-old man was admitted for a syncope workup. After routine evaluation, he was diagnosed with syncope of an unknown cause and was discharged from the hospital. He was readmitted due to dizziness. On repeated Holter monitoring, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia was detected during syncope. We performed intracoronary ergonovine provocation test; severe coronary spasm was induced at 70% stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery. The patient was treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We present a rare case of syncope induced by ventricular arrhythmia in a patient with variant angina without chest pain. (Korean Circ J 2016;46(1):102-106) KEY WORDS: Prinzmetal’s variant angina; Coronary vasospasm; Tachycardia, ventricular. Introduction Case Variant angina commonly manifests as chest pain and transient A 68-year-old man visited our emergency room due to recurrent ST elevation by coronary spasm, and generally follows a benign syncope. He had experienced four episodes of syncope with clinical course.1) Rarely, syncope induced by ventricular arrhythmia dizziness and chest discomfort during the prior 2 months. The associated with transient myocardial ischemia can be developed episodes were evoked when he was preparing his boat for sailing by coronary spasm.2)3) If the cause of syncope is not correctly in early morning.
    [Show full text]