A Preliminary Survey of the Avifauna of the Mexican State of Oaxaca

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Preliminary Survey of the Avifauna of the Mexican State of Oaxaca Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1968 A Preliminary Survey of the Avifauna of the Mexican State of Oaxaca. (Volumes 1 and 2). Laurence Charles Binford Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Binford, Laurence Charles, "A Preliminary Survey of the Avifauna of the Mexican State of Oaxaca. (Volumes 1 and 2)." (1968). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1468. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1468 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 69-4451 BINFORD, Laurence Charles, 1935- A PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF THE AVIFAUNA OF THE MEXICAN STATE OF OAXACA. (VOLUMES 1 AND 2). Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1968 Zoology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. A PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF THE AVIFAUNA OF THE MEXICAN STATE OF OAXACA Volume 1 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Zoology and Physiology by Laurence Charles Binford B.S., University of Michigan, 1957 August, 1968 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS No work of this nature could be completed satisfactorily without the assistance of a large number of people. To the many friends who have aided in this venture, I wish to express my sincerest appreciation. During the course of my research, I made three field expeditions to México, each lasting four to five months. On the first trip, I was ably assisted by Larry L. Wolf, on the second by Delwyn G. Berrett and Franklin M. Berrett, and on the third by John J. Morony. The aid and cooperation provided by these people not only greatly increased the proficiency of the expeditions in the procurement and prepara­ tion of specimens but made the rigorous field work far more enjoyable. Special thanks are due to Profesor Jordi Julia Z., of the Laboratorio de Entomologie, Comisién del Papaloapan, whose unselfish expenditure of time and effort made possible the establishment of collecting stations near Valle Nacional and at Temascal. The assistance of Thomas MacDougall was indispensible in arranging the pack trip into the cloud forests of the Sierra Madre de Chiapas, and his efforts to procure data on the Wild Turkey in Oaxaca are much appreciated. Mr. and Mrs. ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Roy H. Jones, whose beautiful Oaxaca Courts provided days of respite from the rigors of field work, were particularly helpful in obtaining supplies and making space for storage of specimens. Financial assistance was received from a variety of sources. The Department of Zoology of Louisiana State Uni­ versity provided special funds for one of the field expedi­ tions, and research assistantships were made available for myself and my field companions through the Louisiana State University Museum of Zoology. Research at Louisiana State University and at various museums around the United States was supported in part by one Cooperative Graduate Fellowship and two Summer Fellowships from the National Science Founda­ tion. Research at the American Museum of Natural History was made possible through a grant from the Frank M. Chapman Memorial Fund. Numerous people have unselfishly supplied me with original unpublished notes on the birds of Oaxaca. Charles G. Sibley and Lester L. Short, Jr., made available the notes taken at La Cumbre by themselves and J. B. Bowers, H. E. Childs, R. H. Long, and P. C. Sibley. Other persons to whom I am greatly indebted for the use of their notes are William B. Davis, Robert W. Dickerman, Ernest P. Edwards, Richard R. and Jean Graber, John Hubbard, Philip R. Lenna, Frederick W. Loetscher, William B. Robertson, and A. W. Schorger. My heartfelt thanks are especially due to Philip S. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Humphrey, whose instruction, advice, encouragement, and material favors down through the years have, in very large measure, made possible the realization of a dream, of which my work in Oaxaca was a part. Allan R. Phillips has been especially helpful, not only by allowing free access to his collection but also by spending many hours on my behalf providing data on specimens, localities, and taxonomic problems. I have also benefited greatly from long discussions with Burt L. Monroe, Jr. For the loan of specimens, free access to collections, cooperation, and assistance, I am greatly indebted to a number of individuals and their associated institutions. Special thanks are extended to the following:' Ned K. Johnson, Frank A. Pitelka, and the late Alden H. Miller, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley; Thomas R. Howell and 0. M. Buchanan, Jr., University of California at Los Angeles; John W. Hardy, Robert T. Moore Laboratory of Zoology, Occidental College; Robert M. Mengel and Richard F . Johnson, Museum of Zoology, University of Kansas; Austin L. Rand, Emmet R. Blake, and Melvin A. Traylor, Field Museum of Natural History; Dean Amadon, Eugene Eisenmann, Wesley E. Lanyon, Charles E. O'Brien, and Charles T. Collins, American Museum of Natural History; Raymond A. Paynter, Jr., Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard Univer­ sity; Alexander Wetmore, Richard L. Zusi, and John W. Aldrich, United States National Museum; Joe T. Marshall, Department iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. of Zoology, University of Arizona; Kenneth E. Stager, Los Angeles County Museum; George M. Sutton, Stovall Museum, University of Oklahoma, Norman; Robert W. Storer, Harrison B. Tordoff, and Norman L. Ford, University of Michigan; Charles C. Sibley and Neal G. Smith, Cornell University; Ed N. Harrison and the late William J. Sheffler, Western Founda­ tion of Vertebrate Zoology, Los Angeles; Keith A. Arnold, Texas Cooperative Wildlife Museum, Texas Agricultural and Mechanical University, College Station; and Donald F. Hoffmeister, University of Illinois Museum of Natural History. I would also like to express my great appreciation to the following: my advisor, George H. Lowery, Jr., whose unfailing support and encouragement has made this project possible; Robert J. Newman, who toiled many weeks in careful examination of the manuscript; and H. Bruce Boudreaux, Walter J. Harman, Douglas A. Rossman, and J. Harvey Roberts, the other members of my graduate committee, who also read the manuscript. V Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS........................................... Ü LIST OF TABLES .............................. X Ü LIST OF FIGURES........................................... xiii ABSTRACT ............................................... xiv Volume 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................... 1 GENERAL PHYSIOGRAPHY .................................. 15 Physiographic Regions................................ 15 Mesa del S u r ............... 15 Atlantic coastal lowlands......................... 19 Pacific coastal lowlands ......................... 20 Isthmus of Tehuantepec ........................... 23 Sierra Madre de Chiapas....................... 25 Hydrography............... 27 CLIMATE................................................. 29 HABITATS ............... - ............................. 42 Extensive Terrestrial Habitats ..................... 52 Tropical evergreen forest......................... 52 Cloud forest ...................................... 58 Humid pine-oak forest.............................. 53 Arid pine-oak forest .............................. 68 VI Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PAGE Tropical semideciduous forest...................... 73 Tropical deciduous forest.......................... 75 Arid tropical scrub................. 79 Arid temperate scrub .............................. 85 S t e p p e .............................................. 89 Savanna.............................................. 91 Restricted Terrestrial Habitats...................... 95 Humid gallery forest .............................. 95 Palm forest......................................... 97 Fir f o r e s t ......................................... 98 Juniper scrub....................................... 99 Man-made Terrestrial Habitats........................ 100 F i n c a s ............................................... 102 G u a m i l ............................................... 103 Cultivated land....................................... 103 Grazed land......................................... 104 S t r u c t u r e s ......................................... 104 Open Aquatic Habitats...............................
Recommended publications
  • PUEBLA* Municipios Entidad Tipo De Ente Público Nombre Del Ente Público
    Inventario de Entes Públicos PUEBLA* Municipios Entidad Tipo de Ente Público Nombre del Ente Público Puebla Municipio 21-001 Acajete Puebla Municipio 21-002 Acateno Puebla Municipio 21-003 Acatlán Puebla Municipio 21-004 Acatzingo Puebla Municipio 21-005 Acteopan Puebla Municipio 21-006 Ahuacatlán Puebla Municipio 21-007 Ahuatlán Puebla Municipio 21-008 Ahuazotepec Puebla Municipio 21-009 Ahuehuetitla Puebla Municipio 21-010 Ajalpan Puebla Municipio 21-011 Albino Zertuche Puebla Municipio 21-012 Aljojuca Puebla Municipio 21-013 Altepexi * Inventario elaborado con información del CACEF y EFSL. 19 de marzo de 2020 Inventario de Entes Públicos PueblaPUEBLA* Municipio 21-014 Amixtlán Puebla Municipio 21-015 Amozoc Puebla Municipio 21-016 Aquixtla Puebla Municipio 21-017 Atempan Puebla Municipio 21-018 Atexcal Puebla Municipio 21-019 Atlixco Puebla Municipio 21-020 Atoyatempan Puebla Municipio 21-021 Atzala Puebla Municipio 21-022 Atzitzihuacán Puebla Municipio 21-023 Atzitzintla Puebla Municipio 21-024 Axutla Puebla Municipio 21-025 Ayotoxco de Guerrero Puebla Municipio 21-026 Calpan Puebla Municipio 21-027 Caltepec Puebla Municipio 21-028 Camocuautla Puebla Municipio 21-029 Caxhuacan Inventario de Entes Públicos PueblaPUEBLA* Municipio 21-030 Coatepec Puebla Municipio 21-031 Coatzingo Puebla Municipio 21-032 Cohetzala Puebla Municipio 21-033 Cohuecan Puebla Municipio 21-034 Coronango Puebla Municipio 21-035 Coxcatlán Puebla Municipio 21-036 Coyomeapan Puebla Municipio 21-037 Coyotepec Puebla Municipio 21-038 Cuapiaxtla de Madero Puebla Municipio
    [Show full text]
  • Maya Knowledge and "Science Wars"
    Journal of Ethnobiology 20(2); 129-158 Winter 2000 MAYA KNOWLEDGE AND "SCIENCE WARS" E. N. ANDERSON Department ofAnthropology University ofCalifornia, Riverside Riverside, CA 92521~0418 ABSTRACT.-Knowledge is socially constructed, yet humans succeed in knowing a great deal about their environments. Recent debates over the nature of "science" involve extreme positions, from claims that allscience is arbitrary to claims that science is somehow a privileged body of truth. Something may be learned by considering the biological knowledge of a very different culture with a long record of high civilization. Yucatec Maya cthnobiology agrees with contemporary international biological science in many respects, almost all of them highly specific, pragmatic and observational. It differs in many other respects, most of them highly inferential and cosmological. One may tentatively conclude that common observation of everyday matters is more directly affected by interaction with the nonhuman environment than is abstract deductive reasoning. but that social factors operate at all levels. Key words: Yucatec Maya, ethnoornithology, science wars, philosophy ofscience, Yucatan Peninsula RESUMEN.-EI EI conocimiento es una construcci6n social, pero los humanos pueden aprender mucho ce sus alrededores. Discursos recientes sobre "ciencia" incluyen posiciones extremos; algunos proponen que "ciencia" es arbitrario, otros proponen que "ciencia" es verdad absoluto. Seria posible conocer mucho si investiguemos el conocimiento biol6gico de una cultura, muy difcrente, con una historia larga de alta civilizaci6n. EI conodrniento etnobiol6gico de los Yucatecos conformc, mas 0 menos, con la sciencia contemporanea internacional, especial mente en detallas dcrivadas de la experiencia pragmatica. Pero, el es deferente en otros respectos-Ios que derivan de cosmovisi6n 0 de inferencia logical.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostico Y Plan Municipal De Desarrollo Rural
    DIAGNOSTICOYPLANMUNICIPALDEDESARROLLO RURALSUSTENTABLE MUNICIPIO HEROICACIUDADDEEJUTLADECRESPO ADMINISTRACIÓN20082010 INDICEGENERAL PAGINA PARTE I. FORMULACION DEL DIAGNOSTICO MUNICIPAL DE 1 DESARROLLO…………………………………………………………. 1. MENSAJE DEL PRESIDENTE MUNICIPAL CONSTITUCIONAL………. 1 2. PRINCIPIOS DE LA PLANEACION DEL DESARROLLO MUNICIPAL… 2 3. MARCO DE REFERENCIA…………………………………………………….. 2 3.1. MARCO JURIDICO 2 3.2. MARCO NORMATIVO 4 3.3. MARCO METODOLOGICO 4 5. EJE INSTITUCIONAL……………………………………………. 5 5.1. LAS OFICINAS QUE SE ENCUENTRAN EN EL MUNICIPIO DE EJUTLA DE CRESPO……………………………………………………….. 5 5.2. EQUIPO………………………………………………………………………. 6 5.3. VEHICULOS…………………………………………………………………. 6 5.4. RECURSOS HUMANOS…………………………………………………... 7 5.5. ESTRUCTURA DE LA ADMINISTRACION MUNICIPAL 2008-2010…... 7 5.6. PROFESIONALIZACIÓN MUNICIPAL……………………………………. 8 5.7. RECURSOS FINANCIEROS………………………………………………... 9 5.7.1. INGRESOS MUNICIPALES………………………………………….. 9 A) IMPUESTOS……………………………………………………….. 9 B) DERECHOS………………………………………………………... 9 5.7.2. EGRESOS Y SU APLICACIÓN……………………………………… 10 A) PRESUPUESTO DE EGRESOS DEL MUNICIPIO………………. 10 B) GASTOS DE INVERSIÓN………………………………………… 11 C) GASTOS PRESUPUESTALES DEL RAMO 33 FONDO III……... 11 5.8. REGLAMENTACION MUNICIPAL………………………………………... 12 5.8.1. BANDO DE POLICIA Y BUEN GOBIERNO………………………. 12 5.8.2. REGLAMENTACIONES SECUNDARIAS………………………….. 13 5.9. PRESTACIÓN DE SERVICIOS Y SU CALIDAD………………………….. 13 5.9.1. AGUA POTABLE……………………………………………………... 13 5.9.2. DRENAJE……………………………………………………………… 13 5.9.3. ALUMBRADO PÚBLICO…………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Avocado Studies in Mexico in 1938
    California Avocado Association 1938 Yearbook 23: 67-85 Avocado Studies in Mexico in 1938 A. D. SHAMEL Principal Physiologist, Division of Fruit and Vegetable Crops and Diseases United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry The Fuerte is the most important commercial avocado variety grown in California, since more than seventy-five per cent of the acreage and production is of that variety. This relatively high proportion is increasing because the Fuerte trees in southern California have survived low winter temperatures more successfully than most other commercial varieties. The Fuerte variety originated as a bud propagation of the parent Fuerte tree (fig. 1) that is located in the Le Blanc garden at Atlixco, state of Puebla, Mexico. The next most important commercial variety, Puebla, has been propagated in southern California from buds of a tree in the Vicente Pineda garden (fig. 2) that is located near the Le Blanc garden. The buds from the parent trees of both the Fuerte and Puebla were obtained at the same time, 1911, by Carl B. Schmidt of Mexico City, and sent to the West India Gardens at Altadena, California. The recent visit of about fifty members of the California Avocado Association and friends to Atlixco on April 17, 1938, was for the purpose of unveiling a memorial tablet at the site of the Fuerte tree and presenting medals to Alejandro Le Blanc, son of the man who planted the parent Fuerte tree, and to Carl B. Schmidt, who sent the buds to California. Appropriate congratulatory speeches were made by the Governor of the state of Puebla, the Secretary of the Mexican Department of Agriculture representatives of the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Descargue El Catálogo De Zonas Económicas Del Gobierno Federal
    S H SUBSECRETARIA DE EGRESOS C P DIRECCION GENERAL DE NORMATIVIDAD Y DESARROLLO ADMINISTRATIVO CATALOGO DE ZONAS ECONOMICAS DEL GOBIERNO FEDERAL VIGENTE: A PARTIR DEL16 DE MAYO DE 1996 HOJA 1 DE 57 ENTIDAD CODIGO FEDERATIVA CLAVE I I CLAVE I I I MUNICIPIOS 01 AGUASCALIENTES B 001 AGUASCALIENTES 002 ASIENTOS 003 CALVILLO 004 COSIO 005 JESUS MARIA 006 PABELLON DE ARTEAGA 007 RINCON DE ROMOS 008 SAN JOSE DE GRACIA 009 TEPEZALA 010 LLANO, EL 011 SAN FRANCISCO DE LOS ROMO 02 BAJA CALIFORNIA B MUNICIPIOS 001 ENSENADA 002 MEXICALI 003 TECATE 004 TIJUANA 005 PLAYAS DE ROSARITO 03 BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR B MUNICIPIOS 001 COMONDU 002 MULEGE 003 PAZ, LA 004 CABOS, LOS 005 LORETO 04 CAMPECHE B MUNICIPIOS 001 CALKINI 002 CAMPECHE 003 CARMEN 004 CHAMPOTON 005 HECELCHAKAN 006 HOPELCHEN 007 PALIZADA 008 TENABO 009 ESCARCEGA 05 COAHUILA B MUNICIPIOS B MUNICIPIOS 004 ARTEAGA 001 ABASOLO 009 FRANCISCO I. MADERO 002 ACUÑA ZONIFICADOR-1996 D: CLAVE: A: POBLACIONES B: MUNICIPIOS S H SUBSECRETARIA DE EGRESOS C P DIRECCION GENERAL DE NORMATIVIDAD Y DESARROLLO ADMINISTRATIVO CATALOGO DE ZONAS ECONOMICAS DEL GOBIERNO FEDERAL VIGENTE: A PARTIR DEL16 DE MAYO DE 1996 HOJA 2 DE 57 ENTIDAD CODIGO FEDERATIVA CLAVE I I CLAVE I I I 05 COAHUILA B MUNICIPIOS B MUNICIPIOS 017 MATAMOROS 003 ALLENDE 024 PARRAS 005 CANDELA 030 SALTILLO 006 CASTAÑOS 033 SAN PEDRO 007 CUATROCIENEGAS 035 TORREON 008 ESCOBEDO 036 VIESCA 010 FRONTERA 011 GENERAL CEPEDA 012 GUERRERO 013 HIDALGO 014 JIMENEZ 015 JUAREZ 016 LAMADRID 018 MONCLOVA 019 MORELOS 020 MUZQUIZ 021 NADADORES 022 NAVA 023 OCAMPO
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of San Juan Mixtepec, District of Miahuatlán, Oaxaca, Mexico
    Cotinga 16 Birds of San Juan M ixtepec, district of Miahuatlán, Oaxaca, Mexico Eugene S. Hunn, Donato Acuca Vásquez and Patricia Escalante Cotinga 16 (2001): 14–26 Se reporta la situación de 188 especies de aves observadas (o reportadas por gente del lugar en cinco casos) en los municipios de San Juan y San Pedro Mixtepec, distrito de Miahuatlán, Oaxaca, México, de julio de 1996 a marzo del 2000, en 235 días de trabajo de campo durante 57 visitas. Las observaciones fueron hechas por los autores bajo una investigación etnobiológica conducida por ESH. El área comprende cerca de 57 km2 del lado norte de la Sierra de Miahuatlán, entre los 1.630 y 3705 msnm. Sus hábitats, en orden de altitud, son: bosque subtropical caducifolio y matorral subtropical, bosque de galería, matorral de encino o chaparral, cultivos y pastizales, encinares, bosque de pino-encino seco, bosque de pino-abeto húmedo y bosques de Pinus ruáis de altura. De nuestros reportes lo más notable es el registro de la sita enana Sitta pygmaea que aparentemente es un residente permanente del área, y cuatro primeros registros para la Sierra Madre del Sur de Oaxaca, los tres primeros son los registros más meridionales para las especies en cuestión, para el tecolote enano Micrathene whitneyi, el reyezuelo de oro Regulus satrapa, el picogrueso norteño Coccothraustes vespertinus y el picogrueso encapuchado C. abeillei. Introduction as it contains an extensive ‘island’ of pine forest We summarise the status of 188 species of birds above 3400 m, isolated by at least 300 km from simi­ observed (or reported by local residents in five cases) lar high terrain both in both Mexico’s Central in or near the municipio of San Juan Mixtepec (in­ Volcanic Axis and on the Chiapas-Guatemala bor­ cluding portions of adjacent San Pedro Mixtepec), der.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Entidad Municipio Localidad Long Lat
    Entidad Municipio Localidad Long Lat Oaxaca Acatlán de Pérez Figueroa COBAGAR 962601 182659 Chiquihuitlán de Benito Oaxaca Juárez EL AGUACATE 964459 180010 Chiquihuitlán de Benito Oaxaca Juárez LOMA OJITECA 964511 180017 Oaxaca Huautla de Jiménez AGUA DE CARRIZO 964656 181009 Oaxaca Huautla de Jiménez AGUA DE HUESO (SEGUNDA SECCIÓN) 964700 180850 Oaxaca Huautla de Jiménez AGUA DE LLANO 964737 181046 Oaxaca Huautla de Jiménez AGUA DE TIERRA 964749 180908 Oaxaca Huautla de Jiménez AGUA FLOR FRÍA 964715 181034 Oaxaca Huautla de Jiménez BARRANCA SECA 964525 181333 Oaxaca Huautla de Jiménez PIEDRA COLORADA 964711 180956 Oaxaca Huautla de Jiménez PLAN DE ARENA 964736 180921 Oaxaca Loma Bonita 10 DE ABRIL 955332 180036 Oaxaca Loma Bonita 10 DE ABRIL 955332 180036 Oaxaca Loma Bonita 20 DE NOVIEMBRE 955311 180144 Oaxaca Loma Bonita 20 DE NOVIEMBRE 955311 180144 Oaxaca Loma Bonita 21 DE MARZO (EDUARDO AZAMAR AGUIRRE) 955223 175747 Oaxaca Loma Bonita 21 DE MARZO (EDUARDO AZAMAR AGUIRRE) 955223 175747 Oaxaca Loma Bonita 27 DE FEBRERO 955321 180738 Oaxaca Loma Bonita 27 DE FEBRERO 955321 180738 Oaxaca Loma Bonita 3 HERMANOS 955139 175933 Oaxaca Loma Bonita 3 HERMANOS 955139 175933 Oaxaca Loma Bonita AEROPUERTO 955135 180104 Oaxaca Loma Bonita AEROPUERTO 955135 180104 Oaxaca Loma Bonita AGUA CLARITA 955010 180531 Oaxaca Loma Bonita AGUA CLARITA 955010 180531 Oaxaca Loma Bonita AGUA DULCE 955438 175545 Oaxaca Loma Bonita AGUA DULCE 955438 175545 Oaxaca Loma Bonita AGUA FRÍA 955408 180434 Oaxaca Loma Bonita AGUA FRÍA 955337 180511 Oaxaca Loma Bonita
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinadora De Intersectorialidad
    “2020, AÑO DE LA PLURICULTURALIDAD DE LOS PUEBLOS INDÍGENAS Y AFROMEXICANO” REPORTE DIARIO DE ACTIVIDADES DATOS GENERALES UNIDAD RESPONSABLE: Dirección de Capacitación y Apoyo a la Gestión Municipal FECHA: 11 de diciembre de 2020 FOLIO: SBFM/20-0081 FOLIO ANTERIOR PARA SEGUIMIENTO: ninguno CLASIFICACIÓN DE LA ACTIVIDAD: TIPO: Otro MATERIA: Capacitación ENTIDAD: Municipios de las Regiones de Mixteca, Sierra Sur, Costa, Cañada y Sierra Norte PARTES QUE INTERVIENEN: 387 municipios, SECRETARÍA DE SALUD, SAPAO, SESIPINNA y DIGEPO ACCIONES PREVIAS TOMADAS POR LAS PARTES: Invitación mediante correo electrónico y WhatsApp a las autoridades municipales convocadas MEDIDAS PREVIAS IMPLEMENTADAS POR LA SEGEGO: NO APLICA SOLICITANTE (S): NOMBRE CARGO En cumplimiento a los acuerdos números 716 y 807 emitidos N/A por el H. Congreso del Estado de Oaxaca en coordinación con la Secretaría de Salud y SAPAO, se llevó a cabo en los días 08, 09 y 10 de diciembre del presente año la jornada de capacitación virtual denominada “Transición a la Nueva Normalidad ante el COVID-19”. PARTICIPANTE (S) EXTERNO (S): NOMBRE CARGO REPRESENTA A: Mtra. María del Rosario Secretaria Ejecutiva SESIPINNA Villalobos Rueda Mtro. Ignacio Pareja Amador Director General DIGEPO Lic. En Psic. Rosalba Martínez Coordinadora de SALUD Leyva Intersectorialidad Lic. Martha Fabiola Medina Jefa del Departamento de SALUD Casas Promoción de la Salud Ing. Eric Vázquez Arrellanes Auxiliar del Departamento de SAPAO Calidad Carretera Oaxaca-Istmo Km. DIRECCIÓN DE CONTROL DE LA GESTION 11.5 DEPARTAMENTO DE ANÁLISIS DE INFORMACIÓN Y RESULTADOS Edificio 8, Nivel 3, C.P. 68270 Tlalixtac de Cabrera, Oax. Tel. Conmutador. 01 (951)501-5000 “2020, AÑO DE LA PLURICULTURALIDAD DE LOS PUEBLOS INDÍGENAS Y AFROMEXICANO” RESPONSABLES DE LA ATENCIÓN O SEGUIMIENTO POR LA SEGEGO: NOMBRE CARGO Lic.
    [Show full text]
  • A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS of SONG and RESPONSES to SONG PLAYBACK University of Colorado at Denver
    FINAL REPORT A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SONG AND RESPONSES TO SONG PLAYBACK IN THE AVIAN GENUS PIPILO Peter S. Kaplan Department of Psychology University of Colorado at Denver Abstract An experiment was undertaken to characterize the responses of Green-tailed Towhees (Pipilo chlorura) and Rufous-sided Towhees (P. erythophthalmus) to each others' songs and to the songs of five other towhee species, plus one hybrid form. A total of 12 Green-Tailed Towhees and 10 Rufous-sided Towhees from Boulder and Gilpin counties were studied at three field sites: the Doudy Draw Trail, the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), and on private land at the mouth of Coal Creek Canyon. In May, each bird was mist-netted and banded to facilitate individual identification. During the subsequent playback phase in June and July, each individual received one three-part playback trial on each of 7 consecutive or near-consecutive days. A 9-min playback trial consisted of a 3-min "pre-play" period, during which the bird was observed in the absence of song playback, a 3-min "play" period, in which tape recorded song was played to the subject from a central point in his territory, and a 3-min "post-play" period when the bird • was again observed in the absence of song playback. Order of presentation of song exemplars from different towhee species were randomized across birds. The main dependent measure was the change in the number of songs produced by the subject bird during song playback, relative to the pre-play period. Results showed that Green-tailed Towhees responded by significantly increasing their rate of singing, but only in response to Green-tailed Towhee songs.
    [Show full text]
  • Catálogo De Las Lenguas Indígenas Nacionales: Variantes Lingüísticas De México Con Sus Autodenominaciones Y Referencias Geoestadísticas
    Lunes 14 de enero de 2008 DIARIO OFICIAL (Primera Sección) 31 INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE LENGUAS INDIGENAS CATALOGO de las Lenguas Indígenas Nacionales: Variantes Lingüísticas de México con sus autodenominaciones y referencias geoestadísticas. Al margen un logotipo, que dice: Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas. CATÁLOGO DE LAS LENGUAS INDÍGENAS NACIONALES: VARIANTES LINGÜÍSTICAS DE MÉXICO CON SUS AUTODENOMINACIONES Y REFERENCIAS GEOESTADÍSTICAS. El Consejo Nacional del Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas, con fundamento en lo dispuesto por los artículos 2o. de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos; 15, 16, 20 y tercero transitorio de la Ley General de Derechos Lingüísticos de los Pueblos Indígenas; 1o., 3o. y 45 de la Ley Orgánica de la Administración Pública Federal; 1o., 2o. y 11 de la Ley Federal de las Entidades Paraestatales; y los artículos 1o. y 10 fracción II del Estatuto Orgánico del Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas; y CONSIDERANDO Que por decreto publicado en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 14 de agosto de 2001, se reformó y adicionó la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, determinando el carácter único e indivisible de la Nación Mexicana y su composición pluricultural sustentada en sus pueblos indígenas. Que con esta reforma constitucional nuestra Carta Magna reafirma su carácter social, al dedicar un artículo específico al reconocimiento de los derechos de los pueblos indígenas. Que el artículo 2o. constitucional establece que “los pueblos indígenas son aquellos que descienden de poblaciones que habitaban en el territorio actual del país al iniciarse la colonización y que conservan sus propias instituciones sociales, económicas, culturales y políticas, o parte de ellas.” Que uno de los derechos de los pueblos y las comunidades indígenas que reconoce el apartado “A” del artículo 2o.
    [Show full text]
  • Voice in Communication and Relationships Among Brown Towhees
    THE CONDOR VOLUME 66 SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER, 1964 NUMBER 5 VOICE IN COMMUNICATION AND RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BROWN TOWHEES By JOET.MARSHALL,JR. This paper seeks to answer two questions: (1) What is the function of each song and call in brown towhees; that is, what information does a bird communicate to its fellows vocally, o’r how does it regulate their behavior by its voice? (2) What evi- dence does voice offer for understanding relationship by descent within the closely-knit group of brown towhee species? For the first, I would extend the analysis of Quain- tance (1938,194l) to all members of the group. As to the second question, an ingenious evolutionary reconstruction, based on museum and habitat studies, has been developed by Davis (1951). Do vocal attributes agree with his scheme? The three speciesof brown towhees, genus Pipdo, are the same size and general color and are more similar to each other than any one of them is to other ground-inhabiting finches in the same genus and in the genus Melozorte. Indeed, so close is their relation- ship that the same calls can easily be discerned in each species; although differing in timbre, similarity in form and usage proclaims them to be homologous. The Abert Towhee (Pipdo abed) occupies dense riparian woodland and mesquite thickets of the Colorado River and Gila River drainages, mostly in Arizona. The Brown Towhee proper (Pip20 fuscus) lives in brushy margins of openings in the southwestern United States and Mexico. The White-throated Towhee (Pipilo aZbicoZZis)inhabits brushy slopes, often with tree yuccas, in Puebla and Oaxaca, MCxico.
    [Show full text]