Dickinson College Dickinson Scholar Faculty and Staff Publications By Year Faculty and Staff Publications Spring 2016 Science in Early America: Print Culture and the Sciences of Territoriality Conevery Bolton Valencius David I. Spanagel Emily Pawley Dickinson College Sara Stidstone Gronim Paul Lucier Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.dickinson.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Book and Paper Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Valencius,̌ Conevery Bolton, David I. Spanagel, Emily Pawley, Sara Stidstone Gronim, and Paul Lucier. "Science in Early America: Print Culture and the Sciences of Territoriality." Journal of the Early Republic 36 (2016): 73-123. This article is brought to you for free and open access by Dickinson Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Science in Early America Print Culture and the Sciences of Territoriality CONEVERY BOLTON VALENCIUS, DAVID I. SPANAGEL, EMILY PAWLEY, SARA STIDSTONE GRONIM, AND PAUL LUCIER Where was science in the early American republic? Genera- tions of scholarship suggested either that there was not very much—early Americans were too busy making farms to think very abstractly—or that what there was took place in the general vicinity of lightning storms. Until relatively recently, most historians of American science drew from twentieth-century modalities of science: Scientists were men, profession- als formally trained in a specialist discipline, working in a purpose-built structure with sensitive instruments and talking mostly with one another. Their primary income came from their research, the legitimate fruits of which were to be formally published in professional journals, typically employing a jargon that might be fully legible only to an elite subset of colleagues.