DOCSLIB.ORG

The Birth of a Forearc: the Basal Great Valley Group, California, USA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Birth of a Forearc: the Basal Great Valley Group, California, USA Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity Geosciences Faculty Research Geosciences Department 2019 The Birth of a Forearc: The Basal Great Valley Group, California, USA D. A. Orme Kathleen D. Surpless Trinity University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/geo_faculty Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Repository Citation Orme, D. A., & Surpless, K. D. (2019). The birth of a forearc: The basal great valley group, California, USA. Geology, 47(8), 757-761. doi: 10.1130/G46283.1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geosciences Department at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geosciences Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. https://doi.org/10.1130/G46283.1 Manuscript received 21 December 2018 Revised manuscript received 15 May 2019 Manuscript accepted 17 May 2019 © 2019 The Authors. Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license. Published online XX Month 2019 The birth of a forearc: The basal Great Valley Group, California, USA Devon A. Orme1 and Kathleen D. Surpless2 1Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, P.O Box 173480, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA 2Department of Geosciences, Trinity University, One Trinity Place, #45, San Antonio, Texas 78212, USA ABSTRACT accumulated unconformably on ophiolitic base- The Great Valley basin of California (USA) is an archetypal forearc basin, yet the tim- ment, broadly termed the Coast Range ophiolite ing, structural style, and location of basin development remain controversial. Eighteen of 20 (CRO), which lies structurally above the Fran- detrital zircon samples (3711 new U-Pb ages) from basal strata of the Great Valley forearc ciscan complex (Bailey et al., 1970). The tim- basin contain Cretaceous grains, with nine samples yielding statistically robust Cretaceous ing of the onset of Farallon subduction beneath maximum depositional ages (MDAs), two with MDAs that overlap the Jurassic-Cretaceous western North America and the tectonic origin of boundary, suggesting earliest Cretaceous deposition, and nine with Jurassic MDAs consistent the CRO are controversial (e.g., Dickinson et al., with latest Jurassic deposition. In addition, the pre-Mesozoic age populations of our samples 1996). In one model, eastward subduction of the are consistent with central North America sources and do not require a southern provenance. Farallon plate beneath North America within a We interpret that diachronous initiation of sedimentation reflects the growth of isolated depo- two-plate system was active by 180–165 Ma centers, consistent with an extensional model for the early stages of forearc basin development. (Wakabayashi, 1992; Mulcahy et al., 2018), and the CRO formed during extension in the forearc INTRODUCTION 1970). Eighteen (18) of our 20 samples contain region of an east-dipping Franciscan subduc- Forearc basins occupy a critical tectonic zone Cretaceous zircons, with nine samples yielding tion zone 172–164 Ma (Saleeby, 1996; Sher- above subducting plates, and their strata contain statistically robust Cretaceous maximum depo- vais, 2001). This subduction margin remained a record of subduction-related orogenesis (e.g., sitional ages (MDAs). As first noted by Surpless primarily non-accretionary for its first ~50 m.y. Dickinson, 1995; Hessler and Sharman, 2018). et al. (2006), a Cretaceous age revision for the and became strongly accretionary at ca. 123 Ma However, these basins have low preservation basal GVG: (1) lengthens the time interval (Dumitru et al., 2010; Wakabayashi, 2015). potential due to active-margin shortening and/or between initiation of subduction and onset of In an arc-arc collisional model, the Smartville destructive phases (e.g., Fildani et al., 2008), and forearc basin sedimentation; (2) lengthens the and Great Valley ophiolite segments of the CRO therefore, the mechanisms of initial basin forma- duration of the unconformity between the GVG formed as backarc ophiolites atop a west-dipping tion are not well understood. The Great Valley and its underlying basement; and (3) doubles subduction zone offshore western North America basin of California (USA) has been the focus of the thickness of Lower Cretaceous GVG strata. (Schweickert and Cowan, 1975; Ingersoll, 2000, more than 100 years of exploration, including Our results document diachronous accumu- 2019; Schweickert, 2015). These ophiolites and detrital zircon (DZ) provenance studies that have lation in the earliest Great Valley forearc region, island arcs accreted onto the California margin revealed sediment dispersal patterns (DeGraaff- with sedimentation beginning in either Late Ju- during the Sierran phase of the Nevadan orog- Surpless et al., 2002; Dumitru et al., 2012; Shar- rassic or Early Cretaceous time along the length eny ca. 162–155 Ma (e.g., Ingersoll, 2008). By man et al., 2015), but also called into question of the Sacramento Valley forearc basin. We sug- 150 Ma, the margin was a consolidated two-plate stratigraphic age constraints on the timing of ini- gest that initial Great Valley forearc sedimenta- system with eastward subduction generating arc tial basin sedimentation (Surpless et al., 2006). tion occurred in isolated latest Jurassic–earliest magmatism and initiation of sedimentation of the Uncertainty regarding the age of the basal Great Cretaceous sub-basins that overfilled to form a GVG atop the Great Valley ophiolite. Valley Group (GVG) impedes our understand- larger, single forearc basin during Early Cre- In both models, the provenance of the GVG ing of how the incipient forearc basin developed taceous time (DeGraaff-Surpless et al., 2002). is constrained to the Klamath-Sierran magmatic as the west coast of North America became a Documenting the birth of this ancient forearc ba- arc by sandstone petrography (e.g., Ingersoll, consolidated, two-plate subduction system (e.g., sin permits improved understanding of the early 1983), DZ geochronology (e.g., DeGraaff- Ernst, 1970; Dickinson, 1995). Here we provide stages of forearc basin development as well as Surpless et al., 2002), isotopic analysis (e.g., a record of the initiation and provenance of sedi- the Mesozoic development of the central-west- Linn et al., 1992), paleocurrent analysis (e.g., mentation within this archetypal forearc basin. ern margin of North America. Ingersoll, 1979), and mudstone geochemistry We revisit the timing of the earliest GVG (Surpless, 2014). In contrast, a translational sedimentation using U-Pb geochronology of GEOLOGIC SETTING model places basal GVG deposition south of 20 new DZ samples collected from basal GVG The Great Valley forearc basin developed be- the Sierra Nevada, with postulated northward strata (Fig. 1). All samples were collected from tween the Franciscan subduction complex to the translation to its current position west of the strata mapped as Upper Jurassic based on bio- west and the Sierra Nevada magmatic arc to the Sierran arc complete by ca. 120 Ma (Wright stratigraphy (Jones et al., 1969; Imlay and Jones, east (Fig. 1; Dickinson, 1995). Sediment initially and Wyld, 2007). CITATION: Orme, D.A., and Surpless, K.D., 2019, The birth of a forearc: The basal Great Valley Group, California, USA: Geology, v. 47, p. 1–5, https:// doi .org /10 .1130 /G46283.1 Geological Society of America | GEOLOGY | Volume 47 | Number 8 | www.gsapubs.org 1 Downloaded from https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/doi/10.1130/G46283.1/4719521/g46283.pdf by Trinity University user on 13 June 2019 40º30'N A 122º45'W 122º30'W B 140.32 ± 0.66 (3) PH13 0510 15 20 n = 29/60 n = 31/60 Kilometers 0510 15 20 145.88 ± 0.86 (6) PH11 k Miles n = 28/51 n = 23/51 140.76 ± 0.66 (12) PH15 Dry Creek n = 48/60 n = 12/60 COLD FORK FAULT ZONE 153.34 ± 0.97 (6) PH08 Red Bluff n = 23/58 n = 35/58 Elder Cree 140.73 ± 0.96 (5) PH02 n = 32/55 n = 23/55 ELDER CREEK 141.71 ± 0.71 (16) DO61217-9 FAULT ZONE Elder Creek 40ºN n = 112/298 n = 186/298 Corning 151.76 ± 0.84 (4) JR09 McCarty Creek n = 17/30 n = 13/30 PASKENTA FAULT ZONE 148.70 ± 0.77 (10) JR03 n = 42/55 n = 13/55 Stony Creek Orland 145.82 ± 0.38 (17) DO61217-4 Grindstone n = 143/291 n = 148/291 Creek N 147.88 ± 0.39 (14) DO61217-8 n = 91/280 n = 189/280 Stream 142.88 ± 0.82 (4) JR07 Elk Creek Grindstone Creek Contact Willows n = 55/64 n = 9/64 Fault 39º30'N 144.37 ± 0.57 (8) DO61217-3 DZ sample n = 114/283 n = 169/283 locality from Stonyford Surpless et al. 148.00 ± 0.38 (20) DO61217-7 (2006) Funks n = 102/287 n = 185/287 DZ sample Creek locality, this study 148.90 ± 0.72 (14) JR17 Sites Stonyford Ophiolite Lodoga n = 41/60 n = 19/60 sample locality, this study 144.04 ± 0.24 (12) DO61517-2 Town Leesville n = 314/314 n = 0/314 149.14 ± 0.38 (20) DO61417-4 n = 150/295 n = 145/295 148.49 ± 0.32 (30) DO61417-3 Wilbur n = 177/297 n = 120/297 Springs 39ºN 135.44 ± 0.19 (63) DO61417-7 Tertiary-Quaternary rocks, n =304/311 n = 7/311 Franciscan Complex, 142.95 ± 0.45 (10) DO61417-6 Klamath terranes Cache n = 158/290 n =132/290 Coast Range ophiolite Creek McLaughlin Reserve 147.76 ± 0.59 (12) DO61417-2 Upper Cretaceous Great Valley Group McLaughlin n = 111/295 Reserve n = 184/295 Lower Cretaceous Great Valley Group 100140 180220 250 1000 2000 3000 Upper Jurassic Great Valley Group Age (Ma)Age (Ma) Figure 1. A: Geologic map showing sample locations within mapped “Jurassic” Great Valley Group strata, California, USA (modified from Surpless et al., 2006). DZ—detrital zircon. B: Probability distribution plots (PDPs) with YC2σ(3+) (youngest cluster of three or more grains that overlap within 2σ uncertainty) maximum depositional ages (MDAs); number of grains used to calculate MDAs is given in parentheses.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Bibliography of Klamath Mountains Geology, California and Oregon
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A bibliography of Klamath Mountains geology, California and Oregon, listing authors from Aalto to Zucca for the years 1849 to mid-1995 Compiled by William P. Irwin Menlo Park, California Open-File Report 95-558 1995 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. PREFACE This bibliography of Klamath Mountains geology was begun, although not in a systematic or comprehensive way, when, in 1953, I was assigned the task of preparing a report on the geology and mineral resources of the drainage basins of the Trinity, Klamath, and Eel Rivers in northwestern California. During the following 40 or more years, I maintained an active interest in the Klamath Mountains region and continued to collect bibliographic references to the various reports and maps of Klamath geology that came to my attention. When I retired in 1989 and became a Geologist Emeritus with the Geological Survey, I had a large amount of bibliographic material in my files. Believing that a comprehensive bibliography of a region is a valuable research tool, I have expended substantial effort to make this bibliography of the Klamath Mountains as complete as is reasonably feasible. My aim was to include all published reports and maps that pertain primarily to the Klamath Mountains, as well as all pertinent doctoral and master's theses.
    [Show full text]
  • Segmentation of the Laramide Slab—Evidence from the Southern
    Segmentation of the Laramide SlabÐevidence from the southern Sierra Nevada region Jason Saleeby² Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, M.S. 100-23, Pasadena, California 91125, USA ABSTRACT ®ned by plate edge relations and the cor- 1992). A commonly cited plate tectonic mech- responding trajectory of Farallon±North anism for the orogeny is intensi®ed traction During the latest Cretaceous-early Paleo- American relative plate motions when and tectonic erosion of the subcontinental gene Laramide orogeny, the lithosphere be- viewed on a pre-Neogene palinspastic base. mantle lithosphere due to ¯attening of the sub- neath the southernmost Sierra Nevada The plate interior is suggested to have been ducted slab (Coney and Reynolds, 1977; batholith and the adjacent Mojave Desert deformed ®rst by end loading as the shal- Dickinson and Snyder, 1978; Bird, 1988). The region batholith was sheared off and dis- low slab segment initially descended be- response of the craton was deformation and placed deeper into the mantle. The litho- neath the plate edge, and then by greater uplift along a north-northeast±trending corri- sphere beneath the greater Sierra Nevada basal traction components as the shallow dor extending from southwest Arizona batholith to the north was left intact until segment progressed beneath the cratonic through Wyoming (Fig. 1). This intracratonal mid-Miocene time, when fragments of it region. The subcontinental mantle litho- deformation zone is for the most part inboard were entrained as volcanic xenoliths. The sphere beneath the cratonic deformation of the Cordilleran (Sevier) foreland fold-thrust Laramide slab was evidently segmented zone remained intact through Laramide belt, thereby calling for special circumstances into a shallow ¯at segment to the south and time.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Review of the Great Valley Sequence, Eastern Diablo Range and Northern San
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Review of the Great Valley sequence, eastern Diablo Range and northern San Joaquin Valley, central California by J. Alan Bartow1 and TorH.Nilsen2 Open-File Report 90-226 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1990 , Menlo Park, California 2Applied Earth Technologies, Inc, Redwood City, California ABSTRACT The Great Valley sequence of the eastern Diablo Range and northern San Joaquin Valley consists of a thick accumulation of marine and nonmarine clastic rocks of Jurassic to early Paleocene age deposited in a forearc basin that was situated between the Sierran magmatic arc to the east and the Franciscan subduction complex to the west. In the western part of the basin, the sequence rests conformably on the Jurassic Coast Range Ophiolite or is faulted against the structurally underlying Franciscan Complex. Beneath the eastern San Joaquin Valley, the sequence unconformably onlaps igneous and metamorphic rocks of the Sierran magmatic arc. The sequence generally thickens westward to as much as 8-9 km in the Diablo Range, where it is unconformably overlain by late Paleocene and younger strata. The stratigraphy of the Great Valley sequence has been the subject of much work, but problems, particularly nomenclatural, remain. Lithostratigraphic subdivisions of the sequence have not gained widespread acceptance because of the lenticularity of most sandstone bodies, abrupt fades changes in subsurface and outcrops, and the lack of detailed subsurface information from closely spaced or deep wells.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Report (PDF)
    Field Forum Report Sierra Nevada, California • 1–8 SEptEMBER 2012 Each evening participants of the field forum led follow-up group Formation of the Sierra Nevada discussions. These discussions were enriched by a number of posters presented by the participants. Two students, Laura Waters Batholith: Magmatic and Tectonic at the University of Michigan, and Jesse Hahm from the University Processes and Their Tempos of Wyoming, received Best Student Poster awards, which earned them each a trip to the GSA Annual Meeting in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. Plans are underway to publish the field guide as a GSA Special Paper following this field forum. ConvENErs Scott R. Paterson, Department of Earth Sciences, University of DAILY ACTIVITIES Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740, USA, Day 1 was organized by Keith Putirka and Scott Paterson, who [email protected] kicked off the field forum by presenting outcrops of the Jurassic, 28° tilted, upper crustal Guadalupe Igneous Complex and nearby Jade Star Lackey, Pomona College, Claremont, California 91711, USA Hornitos pluton intruding oceanic host rocks of the western Vali Memeti, Department of Earth Sciences, University of foothills of the Sierra Nevada. The Hornitos consists of vertical Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740, USA mafic and felsic dikes, which appear to feed compositionally equivalent magmas into the overlying Guadalupe Igneous Robert B. Miller and Jonathan S. Miller, Department of Geology, Complex (GIC). The GIC is in turn composed of moderately San José State University, San José, California 95192-0102, USA dipping sheets of gabbro and meladiorite at its base, which are overlain by a mingled granite and gabbro zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal and Spatial Trends of Late Cretaceous-Early Tertiary Underplating of Pelona and Related Schist Beneath Southern California and Southwestern Arizona
    spe374-14 page 1 of 26 Geological Society of America Special Paper 374 2003 Temporal and spatial trends of Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary underplating of Pelona and related schist beneath southern California and southwestern Arizona M. Grove Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, 595 Charles Young Drive E, Los Angeles, California 90095-1567, USA Carl E. Jacobson Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3212, USA Andrew P. Barth Department of Geology, Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5132, USA Ana Vucic Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3212, USA ABSTRACT The Pelona, Orocopia, and Rand Schists and the schists of Portal Ridge and Sierra de Salinas constitute a high–pressure-temperature terrane that was accreted beneath North American basement in Late Cretaceous–earliest Tertiary time. The schists crop out in a belt extending from the southern Coast Ranges through the Mojave Desert, central Transverse Ranges, southeastern California, and southwest- ern Arizona. Ion microprobe U-Pb results from 850 detrital zircons from 40 meta- graywackes demonstrates a Late Cretaceous to earliest Tertiary depositional age for the sedimentary part of the schist’s protolith. About 40% of the 206Pb/238U spot ages are Late Cretaceous. The youngest detrital zircon ages and post-metamorphic mica 40Ar/39Ar cooling ages bracket when the schist’s graywacke protolith was eroded from its source region, deposited, underthrust, accreted, and metamorphosed. This interval averages 13 ± 10 m.y. but locally is too short (<~3 m.y.) to be resolved with our methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Production and Loss of Highdensity Batholithic Root, Southern Sierra Nevada, California
    TECTONICS, VOL. 22, NO. 6, 1064, doi:10.1029/2002TC001374, 2003 Production and loss of high-density batholithic root, southern Sierra Nevada, California Jason Saleeby Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA Mihai Ducea Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA Diane Clemens-Knott Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, California, USA Received 20 February 2002; revised 21 March 2003; accepted 1 July 2003; published 18 November 2003. [1] Eclogites are commonly believed to be highly principal source for the batholith was a polygenetic susceptible to delamination and sinking into the mantle hydrous mafic to intermediate composition lower from lower crustal metamorphic environments. crust dominated by mantle wedge-derived mafic We discuss the production of a specific class of intrusions. Genesis of the composite batholith over eclogitic rocks that formed in conjunction with an 50 m.y. time interval entailed the complete the production of the Sierra Nevada batholith. These reconstitution of the Sierran lithosphere. Sierra high-density eclogitic rocks, however, formed by Nevada batholith magmatism ended by 80 Ma in crystal-liquid equilibria and thus contrast sharply conjunction with the onset of the Laramide orogeny, in their petrogenesis and environment of formation and subsequently, its underlying mantle lithosphere from eclogite facies metamorphic rocks. Experimental cooled conductively. In the southernmost Sierra- studies show that when hydrous mafic to intermediate northern Mojave Desert region the subbatholith composition assemblages are melted in excess of mantle lithosphere was mechanically delaminated 1 GPa, the derivative liquids are typical of by a shallow segment of the Laramide slab and Cordilleran-type batholith granitoids, and garnet + was replaced by underthrust subduction accretion clinopyroxene, which is an eclogitic mineralogy, assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Birth of the Sierra Nevada Magmatic Arc: Early Mesozoic Plutonism and Volcanism in the East-Central Sierra Nevada of California
    Origin and Evolution of the Sierra Nevada and Walker Lane themed issue Birth of the Sierra Nevada magmatic arc: Early Mesozoic plutonism and volcanism in the east-central Sierra Nevada of California A.P. Barth1, J.D. Walker2, J.L. Wooden3, N.R. Riggs4, and R.A. Schweickert5 1Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis, 723 West Michigan Street, SL118, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA 2Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA 3Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, California 94305, USA 4School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Campus Box 4099, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA 5Department of Geological Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA ABSTRACT continued during emplacement of the 226– the older, northeast-trending margin (Schweick- 218 Ma Scheelite Intrusive Suite. Ash-fl ow ert and Lahren, 1987; Greene et al., 1997a; Ste- Granitic and volcanic rocks in the east- tuffs are hydrothermally altered but have vens et al., 1997; Stevens and Greene, 2000; central Sierra Nevada, western United high fi eld strength element abundances and Fig. 1), and the initiation of arc volcanism. This States, record the earliest stages of magma- Nd isotopic compositions, suggesting affi nity early Mesozoic volcanism and associated plu- tism in the eastern Sierra Nevada magmatic to the relatively felsic parts of the Wheeler ton emplacement are key constraints on tectonic arc, allowing us to examine magma sources Crest Granodiorite and the granite of Lee models for subduction initiation at the west- and connections between plutonic and volca- Vining Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of a Late Mesozoic Back-Arc Fold and Thrust Belt, Northwestern Great Basin, U.S.A
    Tectonophysics, 102 (1984) 245-214 245 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands EVOLUTION OF A LATE MESOZOIC BACK-ARC FOLD AND THRUST BELT, NORTHWESTERN GREAT BASIN, U.S.A. JOHN S. GLDOW Department of Geology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 772.51 (U.S.A.J (Received October 4, 1982; accepted January 18, 1983) ABSTRACT Oldow, J.S., 1984. Evolution of a Late Mesozoic back-arc fold and thrust belt, northwestern Great Basin, U.S.A. In: R.L. Carlson and K. Kobayashi (Editors), Geodynamics of Back-arc Regions. Tectonophysics, 102: 245-274. The Luning-Fencemaker fold and thrust belt was active from the Middle or Late Jurassic through the Early Cretaceous and involves rocks of the Mesozoic marine-province of the northwestern Great Basin. Rocks of the marine-province were deposited in a back-arc basin bound on the west by the Sierran arc. They are underlain by simatic crust formed either in a Paleozoic marginal-basin formed on the west coast of North America or in an exotic oceanic-arc accreted to North America in the Permo-Triassic. Deposition in the ma~n~pro~nce was localized by the underlying simatic crust, which later controlled the locus of back-arc thrusting. To the south, in areas of the back-arc region overlying continental crust, Mesozoic rocks are terrestrial volcanic and volcanogenic deposits. Rocks of this area are not disrupted by thrusts of significant magnitude until the southwestern end of the Sevier thrust belt is encountered. During contraction, the Luning-Fencemaker thrust belt underwent several hundred kilometers of NW-SE shortening which was not developed in the Sierra Nevada to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Supracrustal Input to Magmas in the Deep Crust of Sierra Nevada Batholith: Evidence from High-D18o Zircon
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 235 (2005) 315–330 = www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Supracrustal input to magmas in the deep crust of Sierra Nevada batholith: Evidence from high-d18O zircon Jade Star Lackeya,*, John W. Valleya, Jason B. Saleebyb aDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, United States bDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States Received 26 October 2004; received in revised form 24 January 2005; accepted 4 April 2005 Available online 1 June 2005 Editor: B. Wood Abstract Oxygen isotope ratios of zircon (Zc) from intrusives exposed in the Tehachapi Mountains, southern California, reveal large inputs of high-d18O supracrustal contaminant into gabbroic and tonalitic magmas deep (N30 km) in the Cretaceous Sierra Nevada batholith. High d18O(Zc) values (7.8F0.7x) predominate in the deep parts of the batholith, but lower values (6.1F0.9x) occur in shallower parts. This indicates a larger gradient in d18O with depth in the batholith than occurs from west to east across it. Oxygen, Sr, and Nd isotope data show that the supracrustal contaminant was likely young (Paleozoic or Mesozoic), hydrothermally altered upper oceanic crust or volcanic arc sediments. Such rocks were subducted or underthrust beneath the Sierran arc during accretion of oceanic terranes onto North America. This component yielded high-d18O magmas that were added to the base of the batholith. On average, gabbros in the southern Sierra contain at least 18% of the subducted supracrustal component. Some tonalite and granodiorite magmas were additionally contaminated by Kings Sequence metase- dimentary rocks, as evidenced by d18O(Zc) and initial 87Sr/86Sr that trend toward values measured for the Kings Sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Late Jurassic-Early Miocene Sedimentation and Plate-Tectonic Evolution of Northern California: Illuminating Example of an Accretionary Margin
    Chin. J. Geochem. (2015) 34(2):123–142 DOI 10.1007/s11631-015-0042-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE Review of Late Jurassic-early Miocene sedimentation and plate-tectonic evolution of northern California: illuminating example of an accretionary margin W. G. Ernst Received: 21 January 2015 / Revised: 23 January 2015 / Accepted: 23 January 2015 / Published online: 7 February 2015 Ó Science Press, Institute of Geochemistry, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Abstract Production of voluminous igneous arc rocks, rapid, nearly orthogonal plate convergence at *125-80 Ma. high-pressure/low-temperature (HP/LT) metamafic rocks, (7) Sierran arc volcanism-plutonism ceased by *80 Ma in westward relative migration of the Klamath Mountains northern California, signaling a transition to shallow, nearly province, and U–Pb ages of deposition, sediment sources, subhorizontal eastward plate underflow attending Laramide and spatial locations of Jurassic and younger, detrital zircon- orogeny far to the east. (8) Presently exposed Paleogene- bearing clastic rocks constrain geologic development of the lower Miocene Franciscan Coastal Belt sedimentary strata northern California continental edge as follows: (1) At were deposited in a tectonic realm unaffected by HP/LT *175 Ma, transpressive plate underflow began to generate subduction. (9) Grenville-age detrital zircons are absent an Andean-type Klamath-Sierran arc along the margin. (2) from the post-120 Ma Franciscan section. (10) Judging from Oceanic crustal rocks were metamorphosed under HP/LT petrofacies and zircon
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Volcaniclastic Record of Early Arc Evolution in the Eastern Ritter Range
    Research Article Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems DOI 10.1029/2018GC007456 Marine volcaniclastic record of early arc evolution in the eastern Ritter Range pendant, central Sierra Nevada, California Barth, A.P.1 , Wooden, J.L.2, Riggs, N.R.3, Walker, J.D.4 , Tani, K.5, Penniston– Dorland, S.C.6, Jacobson, C.E.7 , Laughlin, J.A.1, Hiramatsu, R.1 1Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University~Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202 2U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA (retired) 3School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011 4Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 5National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, Japan 6Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 7Department of Earth and Space Sciences, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, and Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University Key Points: • Detrital zircons preserve age and trace element evidence of ignimbrite provenance • Zircons record >50 million years of early arc magmatic pulses and lull • Explosive volcanism and batholith construction were closely coupled at million-year time scales ABSTRACT Marine volcaniclastic rocks in the Sierra Nevada preserve a critical record of silicic magmatism in the early Sierra Nevada volcanic arc, and this magmatic record provides precise minimum age constraints on subduction inception and tectonic evolution of the early Mesozoic Cordilleran ___________________________________________________________________ This is the author's manuscript of the article published in final edited form as: Barth A.P., Wooden J.L., Riggs N.R., Walker J.D., Tani K., Penniston–Dorland S.C., … Hiramatsu R.
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH a Survey of Sierra Nevada Magmatism Using Great
    RESEARCH A survey of Sierra Nevada magmatism using Great Valley detrital zircon trace-element geochemistry: View from the forearc Kathleen DeGraaff Surpless1, Diane Clemens-Knott2, Andrew P. Barth3, and Michelle Gevedon4 1DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES, TRINITY UNIVERSITY, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78212, USA 2DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY–FULLERTON, FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA 92831, USA 3DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES, INDIANA UNIVERSITY–PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46202, USA 4JACKSON SCHOOL OF GEOSCIENCES, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78712, USA ABSTRACT The well-characterized Sierra Nevada magmatic arc offers an unparalleled opportunity to improve our understanding of continental arc magmatism, but present bedrock exposure provides an incomplete record that is dominated by Cretaceous plutons, making it challeng- ing to decipher details of older magmatism and the dynamic interplay between plutonism and volcanism. Moreover, the forearc detrital record includes abundant zircon formed during apparent magmatic lulls, suggesting that understanding the long-term history of arc magmatism requires integrating plutonic, volcanic, and detrital records. We present trace-element geochemistry of detrital zircon grains from the Great Valley forearc basin to survey Sierra Nevadan arc magmatism through Mesozoic time. We analyzed 257 previously dated detrital zircon grains from seven sandstone samples of volcanogenic, arkosic, and mixed compositions deposited ca. 145–80 Ma along the length
    [Show full text]