National Study on Neck Restraints in Policing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Study on Neck Restraints in Policing ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. TR - 01 - 2007 National Study On Neck Restraint In Policing Date: 2007 - January Prepared for the Canadian Police Research Centre Authors: Christine Hall, MD MSc FRCPC Department of Emergency Medicine Vancouver Island Health Authority Sergeant Chris Butler Calgary Police Service © HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA (2005) © SA MAJESTÉ LA REINE DU CHEF DU CANADA (2005) As represented by the Solicitor General of Canada. représentée par le Solliciteur général du Canada. Foreword Law enforcement officers in Canada are encountering an increasing number of subjects that are not responsive to standard arrest and restraint tactics. Typically, the individuals who are not responsive to traditional restraint techniques are under the influence of central nervous system stimulants or hallucinogens, suffering acute psychosis, or both; all of which present a challenging restraint and control problem for the responding officers. The frequency of officers encountering these subjects in an altered state of cognition, whose actions are typified by episodes of unpredictable, frenzied and violent behaviour is anticipated to continue to increase as cocaine and methamphetamine use grows on a national scale. The inclusion of the latest less lethal technologies, such as the conducted energy device (Taser®), has not eliminated the requirement for officers to utilize physical control tactics to take these subjects into custody. The vascular neck restraint is one of the physical control techniques that officers frequently utilize to restrain these types of individuals. Many police agencies in Canada have included the neck restraint in their use of force paradigm for many years, some agencies have recently adopted or readopted the vascular neck restraint (VNR) and others yet are investigating whether the neck restraint is an appropriate technique to add to the training regimen. There has been little consensus among police professionals and medical investigators regarding the risk of neck restraints applied by police personnel when restraining subjects of police interest. Many medical opinions, coroners’ findings and legal reviews do not reflect the body of knowledge at the time. There are multiple techniques available in the spectrum of neck holds, with little information available regarding potential risks of various techniques. Each technique is different from the other and carries with it a different risk profile. In order to investigate the medical, legal and expert trainer evidence surrounding use of neck restraints, the Canadian Police Research Centre (CPRC) facilitated the following review, which is entitled the National Study on Neck Restraints in Policing. The intent of this review is to provide a multi disciplinary report evaluating police use of neck restraint, with specific attention to vascular neck restraint. The report began with extensive expert medical review of the body of medical evidence and case law surrounding application of neck restraint. The neck restraint was evaluated with focus directed to the various types of neck restraints, the risk of injury from application of the restraint, medical implications and any collateral issues pertaining to case law and training. Recommendations for future evaluations were also generated. Ultimately, the final report on neck restraints in policing provides a framework around which administrators can make informed decisions regarding the following: x Whether or not to teach / authorize the vascular neck restraint, x Development of course training standards and lesson plans, x Application threshold within the use of force continuum, x Training and recertification recommendations, x Policy development, x Risk management 2 The Canadian Police Research Centre and the report’s authors are proud to have contributed to furthering the knowledge, understanding and research of police practices in Canada and abroad. 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………. 5 Declaration of Conflict of Interests…………………………............ 12 Research Methodology Evidence Based Approach…………………………………….. 13 Discussion of Causation……………………………………….. 14 Literature Search……………………………………………….. 15 Expert Medical Consultation…………………………………… 16 Introduction……………………………………………………………… 19 History of Neck Restraints…………………………………………… 20 Types of Neck Restraints Types of Vascular Neck Restraints…………………………… 22 Vascular Neck Restraint Physiology………………………….. 25 Terminology…………………………………………………………….. 27 Medical Implications of the Vascular Neck Restraint Neurology.............................................................................. 28 Cardiology……………………………………………………….. 34 Respiratory……………………………………………………… 38 Specific Risk Groups…………………………………………... 39 Excited Delirium……………………………………………………….. 43 Legal Review Summary ……………………………………………… 49 Applying Medical Principles – Sample Case Study……………... 57 Discussion of Research Questions………………………………… 66 Report Recommendations…………………………………………… . 76 Glossary of Terms……………………………………………………… 81 Appendix A – Law Enforcement / Medical Team Members…….. 86 Appendix B – Bibliography……………………………….….………. 92 Appendix C – Legal Cases Reviewed………………………………. 100 Appendix D – Medical Reports Neurology.............................................................................. 102 Cardiology……………………………………………………….. 105 Appendix E – Levels of Evidence…………………………………… 109 4 Executive Summary Summary of Report Recommendations: 1. Nomenclature For ongoing implementation and evaluation of vascular neck restraint, it is highly recommended that consistent and definable nomenclature for vascular neck restraint is used. The term vascular neck restraint, or its abbreviation, VNR, should be used. Agencies implementing the copyrighted LVNR® should adhere to that specific terminology1. Police applications of restraint technology such as the vascular neck restraint are deserving of a professional and consistent nomenclature to separate use of this restraint technique from the variable, inconsistent and often incorrect attempts at restraint of a person’s neck by untrained and non-police persons. There is a distinct and definable difference in application technique, physiology of effect and anticipated outcome between a vascular neck restraint and other types of holds involving the neck. Appropriate and consistent nomenclature assists in clarifying those differences. The term “carotid sleeper hold” should be abandoned. 2. Injury Potential / Medical Considerations This report finds that, while no restraint methodology is completely risk free, there is not medical reason to routinely expect grievous bodily harm or death following the correct application of the vascular neck restraint in the general population by professional police officers with standardized training and technique. The medical ramifications of application of various and sundry neck holds by untrained individuals and non police personnel cannot be evaluated or anticipated in detail except to say that a lack of a standard approach changes the risk profile of the technique for the worse. Professional application of the standardized vascular neck restraint should not be governed by the medical implications of lay person attempts at “neck holds” as the medical implications are likely to be vastly different. Most police officers have no formal medical training and must anticipate that subjects fall under the normal physiologic and medical characteristics of the general population unless overwhelming evidence or clues presented to the officer suggest otherwise. Good policy guidelines will enable officers to apply appropriate techniques with appropriate discretion, thereby minimizing risk. In the general population the medical implications of the application of vascular neck restraint are detailed in the sections that follow. Full discussion of the physiology of each body system as it responds to VNR application can be found in the body of this report under relevant section headings. 1 The LVNR® is a registered trademark of the National Law Enforcement Training Center (NLETC), Kansas City, Missouri. 5 Specific risk groups for adverse outcomes following application of VNR by appropriately trained individuals: While
Recommended publications
  • January 2021
    6024 Brook Road, Richmond VA 23227 | 804-822-1451 | www.BushinMartialArts.com Gracie Combatives 23 January 2021 36 Essential Techniques Classes Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Trap and Roll Escape – Mount (GU 1) 1 Leg Hook Takedown (GU 6) Jan 3 4 5 6 - JJ 7 8 - Danielle 9 Americana Armlock – Mount (HU 2) 4:15p: Yoga 6:30p: Karate 6:00a: GC – L14 6:30p: Karate 6:00a: GC – L15 10a: Yoga 2 Clinch (Aggressive Opponent) (GU 7) 5:30p: BullyProof -Novice / Ind 5:30p: BullyProof -Novice / Ind 11:15a: GJJ RD Positional Control – Mount (GU 3) 6:30p: GC – L14 7:15p: Karate 6:30p: GC – L15 7:15p: Karate Birthday: / Tech Review 3 Body Fold Takedown (GU 14) 7:50p: Master Cycle -Ind / Adv 7:50p: Master Cycle -Ind / Adv -Brandy Take the Back + R.N.C. – Mount (GU 4&5) BS1: 30; BS2: 24 BS1: 30; BS2: 24 -Austin 4 Clinch (Conservative Opponent) (GU 15) BS3: 18 BS3: 18 Punch Block Series (1-4) – Guard (GU 8) 5 10 – Open Mirror 11 12 13 14 15 16 Guillotine Choke (Standing) (GU 23) 4:15p: Yoga 6:30p: Karate 6:00a: GC – L16 6:30p: Karate 6:00a: GC – L17 10a: Yoga Straight Armlock – Mount (GU 9) 6 Guillotine Defense (GU 32) 5:30p: BullyProof -Novice / Ind 5:30p: BullyProof -Novice / Ind 11:15a: GJJ RD Triangle Choke – Guard (GU 10) 6:30p: GC – L16 7:15p: Karate 6:30p: GC – L17 7:15p: Karate / Tech Review 7 Haymaker Punch Defense (GU 30) 7:50p: Master Cycle -Ind / Adv 7:50p: Master Cycle -Ind / Adv Elevator Sweep – Guard (GU 11) BS1: 31; BS2: 25 BS1: 27; BS2: 25 1:00p: BKD 8 Rear Takedown (GU 29) BS3: 19 BS3: 19 -Judo / Aikido Elbow Escape
    [Show full text]
  • Chokeholds, Relying on a Police Department Rule That Unequivocally Forbids Any Pressure to the Neck, Throat Or Windpipe That May Inhibit Breathing
    A MUTATED RULE: LackLack ofof EnforcementEnforcement inin thethe FaceFace of ofPersistent Persistent Chokehold Chokehold Complaints Incidents inin NewNew YorkYork CityCity An Evaluation of Chokehold Allegations Against Members of the NYPD from January 2009 through June 2014 CIVILIAN COMPLAINT REVIEW BOARD BILL DE BLASIO Mayor RICHARD D. EMERY Chair A Mutated Rule CCRB Mission and Values The New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB) is an independent agency, created by Chapter 18-A of the New York City Charter. The Board is empowered to receive, investigate, mediate, hear, make findings, and recommend action on complaints against New York City police officers alleging the use of excessive or unnecessary force, abuse of authority, discourtesy, or the use of offensive language. In fulfillment of its mission, the Board has pledged: • To report apparent patterns of misconduct, relevant issues and policy matters to the police commissioner and the public. Published 2014 by the New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board 100 Church Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10007 CCRB URL: http://www.nyc.gov/ccrb To order CCRB reports or to obtain additional information, contact General Information: Telephone: (212)912-2061 or (800)341-2272 Or visit, www.nyc.gov/ccrb i New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board – www.nyc.gov/ccrb Preface___________________________________________________ In July 2014, CCRB Board Chair Richard Emery, in the wake of the tragic death of Eric Garner and on behalf of his fellow Board members, asked the CCRB staff to undertake an objective, comprehensive assessment of chokehold complaints made to the CCRB. This study investigates chokehold complaints, primarily from January 2009 until June 2014, in order to report findings and make recommendations to the Police Commissioner and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule Book (PDF)
    TABLE OF CONTENTS - No Gi Rules (Point descriptions, Legal vs. Illegal techniques, match time limits, penalty processes and determining ties for all competitor divisions) PG. – 5 - No Gi Adult, Masters, Directors & Executives (Legal vs. Illegal techniques) PG. – 24 - No Gi Teens (Legal vs. Illegal techniques) PG. – 31 - No Gi Kids (Legal vs. Illegal techniques) PG. – 41 - (Point descriptions, Legal vs. Illegal techniques, match time limits, penalty processes and determining ties for all competitor divisions) PG. – 54 - (Legal vs. Illegal techniques) PG. – 78 - (Legal vs. Illegal techniques) PG. – 89 - (Legal vs. Illegal techniques) PG. – 101 2 NAGA Referee Responsibilities The NAGA Referee is the highest authority on the mat. Failure to adhere to his/her commands will result in penalties assessed, disqualification, event ejection with potential probation from future NAGA events. • NAGA Referees are among the very best trained submission grappling / Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu officials worldwide. • NAGA Referees will perform to the highest standards possible to keep ALL competitors as safe as possible during a NAGA event. • NAGA Referees reserve the right to stop a match at absolutely any given time he/she feels injury is imminent regardless of skill or belt rank. • NAGA Referee decisions are final and may not be contested by competitors, coaches or spectators during a NAGA event. • NAGA Referees will officiate each match according to the rules outlined by this rules manual with unbiased intentions towards any competitor, coach, team or spectator attending any NAGA competition. Please note: The NAGA Event Coordinator can overturn any referee decision due to a referee error. If a mistake has been made that affects the outcome of a match then the event coordinator may overturn the decision and update the bracket accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Heroes Fundamentals Workbook V 1.01 Thank You for Downloading the Heroes Fundamentals Workbook
    Heroes Fundamentals Workbook v 1.01 Thank you for downloading the Heroes Fundamentals Workbook. This workbook is designed to help you track your own progress and make an honest assessment of your abilities in Jiu Jitsu. This workbook is specifically designed with White/Blue belt level in mind, but anyone could benefit from this. HOW TO USE THIS WORKBOOK: Fill out the Heroes Fundamentals Worksheet to the best of your abilities. Only fill out the worksheet with techniques that are actually in your current arsenal. If you don’t have a technique for a particular position, leave that slot blank. At the Fundamental level there should be NO MORE than two (2) techniques per box. The exercise is to list two techniques that you have at each position that would be your first and second choices when in the particular position. Ideally each of these positions should be complimentary to each other. After filling out the worksheet with techniques, give a rating between 1-5 on how comfortable you are with each technique: 1. I have learned the technique in Fundamentals and I don’t really get it 2. I have drilled the technique in Fundamentals and it makes sense, but I haven’t had to chance to use it in drilling and sparring much. 3. I have drilled the technique and I feel I can use it against someone at a lower overall level than me. 4. I have drilled the technique and I feel that I can use it against someone at the same overall level as me.
    [Show full text]
  • Nokido Ju-Jitsu & Judo Student Handbook
    Nokido Ju-Jitsu & Judo Student Handbook North Port, Florida Shihan Earl DelValle HISTORY OF JU-JITSU AND NOKIDO JU-JITSU Ju-Jitsu (Japanese: 柔術), is a Japanese Martial Art and a method of self defense. The word Ju- Jitsu is often spelled as Jujutsu, Jujitsu, Jiu-jutsu or Jiu-jitsu. "Jū" can be translated to mean "gentle, supple, flexible, pliable, or yielding." "Jitsu" can be translated to mean "art" or "technique" and represents manipulating the opponent's force against himself rather than directly opposing it. Ju-Jitsu was developed among the samurai of feudal Japan as a method for defeating an armed and unarmed opponent in which one uses no weapon. There are many styles (ryu) and variations of the art, which leads to a diversity of approaches, but you will find that the different styles have similar, if not the same techniques incorporated into their particular style. Ju-Jitsu schools (ryū) may utilize all forms of grappling techniques to some degree (i.e. throwing, trapping, restraining, joint locks, and hold downs, disengagements, escaping, blocking, striking, and kicking). Japanese Ju-Jitsu grew during the Feudal era of Japan and was expanded by the Samurai Warriors. The first written record of Ju-Jitsu was in 1532 by Hisamori Takeuchi. Takenouchi Ryu Ju-Jitsu is the oldest style of Ju-jitsu and is still practiced in Japan. There are hundreds of different Ju-Jitsu styles that have been documented and are practiced today, one of which is our modern style of Ju-Jitsu, Nokido Ju-Jitsu. Ju-Jitsu is said to be the father of all Japanese Martial Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE BILL No. 4295 No
    HOUSE BILL No. 4295 HOUSE BILL No. 4295 February 17, 2011, Introduced by Reps. Agema, Hooker, Pettalia, Rendon, Bumstead, Huuki, Tyler, Forlini, Glardon, Zorn, Foster, LeBlanc, Meadows, Potvin, Santana and Womack and referred to the Committee on Regulatory Reform. A bill to regulate amateur mixed martial arts; to create certain commissions and provide certain powers and duties for certain state agencies and departments; to license and regulate certain persons engaged in, and connected to, the business of amateur mixed martial arts and certain persons conducting certain contests and exhibitions; to confer immunity under certain circumstances; to provide for the conducting of certain tests; to assess certain fees and fines; to create certain funds; to promulgate rules; and to provide for penalties and remedies. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT: 1 Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the 2 "amateur mixed martial arts regulatory act". 3 CHAPTER 1 HOUSE BILL No. 4295 00193'11 * DAM 2 1 Sec. 10. As used in this act: 2 (a) "Amateur" means an individual mixed martial artist who is 3 not competing and has never competed in a mixed martial arts 4 contest for a money prize or who is not competing and has never 5 competed with or against a professional in a mixed martial art 6 contest for a prize. 7 (b) "Brazilian ju-jitsu", also known as "Gracie ju-jitsu", 8 means a martial art developed in Brazil by the Gracie family during 9 the mid-twentieth century with a major emphasis on ground fighting 10 and grappling.
    [Show full text]
  • BJJ (2) Media Tracker
    US ACADEMY OF MARTIAL ARTS, INC BJJ PROGRAM OUTLINE (2) Class # Attend. Verification Techniques Class # Attend. Verification Techniques Guard Control B Back Mount Submission B B41 B62 Pass Prevention Double Threat Guard Pass A Back Mount Submission Counter A B42 B63 Knee Split Pass Early Escape Guard Pass B Back Mount Submission Counter B B43 B64 Standing Pass Frame Escape Mod. 8 Mod. Guard Submission Counter A Leg Lock Straight Footlock A B44 B65 Triangle Choke Open Guard Setup Guard Submission Counter B Leg Lock Straight Footlock B B45 B66 Straight Armlock Primary Counter Guard Submission Counter C 12 Mod. 11 Mod. Leg Lock Toe Hold A B46 B67 Kimura Standard Toe Hold Guard Submission A Leg Lock Toe Hold B B47 B68 Wrist Control Sequence Primary Counter Guard Submission B Leg Lock Knee Lock A B48 B69 Triple Threat Reverse Drop Guard Sweep A Leg Lock Knee Lock B B49 B70 Scissor Sweep Primary Counter Mod. 9 Mod. Guard Sweep B 13 Mod. Leg Lock Heel Hook A B50 B71 Cross Sweep Standard Heel Hook Sport Guard A Leg Lock Heel Hook B B51 B72 Butterfly Guard Primary Counter Sport Guard B Standing Front Attack Defense A B52 B73 Spider Guard Sucker Punch Defense ReflexClasses Development Half Guard Bottom Strategy A Standing Front Attack Defense B B53 B74 Guard Recover Standing Headlock Half Guard Bottom Strategy B 14 Mod. Standing Rear Attack Defense A B54 B75 Take the back Rear Choke - Standard Half Guard Bottom Strategy C Standing Rear Attack Defense B B55 B76 Elevator Sweep Rear Choke - Pullback Mod.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Belt Test
    Blue Belt Test Eligible Blue Belt Candidates: Fourth Degree White Belts with at least 100 hours of mat time. Test Duration: 60 minutes Cost: $150 Description: Part I. Movement Skills (20 minutes) The blue belt candidate will demonstrate all Basic Flow Movement Drills and Skills. Part II. Gracie Jiu Jitsu (40 minutes) The blue belt candidate will demonstrate all 60 Basic Flow Gracie Jiu Jitsu techniques and variations. Part III. Live Sparring (10 minutes) The blue belt candidate will do two 5 minute rounds of live sparring. Round 1. Grappling (Gi) - 5 minutes - Starting form knees. You and your opponent will try to submit each other. If someone gets submitted before time runs out you will start again from your knees. Continue until the 5 minute round ends. Round 2. Fight Simulation (MMA gloves) - 5 minutes - Starting from a standing position your opponent will initiate a real “bad guy” attack simulating Real Fight scenarios. Your opponent’s objective is to behave as a real “Bad Guy”. Trying to punch you and/or stand up. Your objective is to safely close the distance, take the fight to the ground, establish a dominant position and finish the fight with a submission. You are allowed to strike (open hand slap) your opponent. After every submission you will restart from a standing position. Your ability to preserve energy while tiring your opponent will be evaluated. Grading: The blue belt candidate will be deducted one point per critical mistake. Movement Point Deduction - A point will be deducted for lack of control, awareness or unskilled movement during a movement drill.
    [Show full text]
  • A Roadmap for Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, by Stephan Kesting 2 of 34 a Roadmap for Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Edition 1.4
    A Roadmap for Brazilian Jiu-jitsu, by Stephan Kesting 2 of 34 A Roadmap for Brazilian Jiu-jitsu Edition 1.4 by Stephan Kesting www.grapplearts.com You may distribute this e-Book freely to whomever you want without asking me first. You can email it to your training partners, make it mandatory reading for your students, or add it as a download from your website. The only restrictions are: 1. It must not be sold, although you can include it as bonus when selling other items. 2. It must be distributed unchanged and unmodified in the current PDF file format. About the Author Stephan began his martial arts training in 1981. He currently holds the following ranks and certifications: • Black Belt in Brazilian jiu-jitsu • Instructor in Erik Paulson's Combat Submission Wrestling • Black Belt in Kajukenbo Karate • Instructor in Dan Inosanto's Jun Fan Jeet Kune Do, Filipino Martial Arts, and Maphalindo Silat • Years of experience in a wide range of other martial arts including Judo, Muay Thai, Sambo, Kung Fu, and Capoeira Stephan created and operates Grapplearts.com. He has helped tens of thousands of grapplers improve their skills via his articles, videos, instructional DVDs and instructional apps for iPhone, iPad, Android and Kindle devices. He has published more than 20 articles in magazines like Black Belt, Ultimate Grappling, Tapout, and Ultimate Athlete. Interviews with Stephan have been featured on many different podcasts and martial arts websites. Acknowledgements Stephan would like to thank his instructors, including Professor Marcus Soares, Coach Erik Paulson, Guro Dan Inosanto, and Sifu Philip Gelinas.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Tracker Sheets.Xlsx
    NAME: US ACADEMY OF MARTIAL ARTS, INC Fundamentals Program Outline FUNDAMENTALS Class # Attend. Verification Techniques Class # Attend. Verification Techniques Pinan Shodan 1/3 with Bunkai Take Back + RNC - Mount K1 B4 Clinch-Conservative Opponent Pinan Shodan 2/3 with Bunkai Punch Block Series (1-4) - Guard K2 B5 Guillotine Choke (Standing) Stripes Kyu 13th Stripes Kyu 12th Stripes Kyu 11th Stripes Kyu 10th BJJ Mod. 1 Mod. BJJ Start Date KarateMod.1 Pinan Shodan 3/3 with Bunkai Straight Armlock - Mount Trial Week 4 K3 B6 Guillotine Defense Karate Head-Block Triangle Choke - Guard K4 B7 Haymaker Punch Defense Karate Outside-Block Elevator Sweep - Guard K5 B8 Rear Takedown Karate Inside-Block Elbow Escape - Mount K6 B9 Pull Guard Karate Down-Block Positional Control - Side Mount K7 B10 Date End Karate2 Mod. Double Leg Takedown (Aggressive) Trial Week 4 BJJ Mod. 2 Mod. BJJ Karate Chop-Block Headlock Counters - Mount K8 B11 Standing Headlock Defense Karate Cross Hand-Block Headlock Escape 1 - Side Control K9 B12 Standing Armlock Sparring Sweep Combo Straight Armlock - Guard K10 B13 (Spar Combo, High Chop, Rev. Punch, Sweep, Rev. Punch) Clinch (Aggressive Opponent) Classes Development Reflex Sparring Mix Combo Side, Hook, Back, Spin Back Kick K11 TKD1 (Spar Combo, R. Punch, Chop, Round H, Chop, R. Punch) Taekwondo Sparring Pressure Combo Combos 1-5 K12 KB1 Karate3 Mod. TKD & KB M. 1 M. KB & TKD (Spar Combo, Feint, F. Kick, R. Punch, R. Punc, R. Punch) Kickboxing Creative Self-Defense Principles Bent Elbow Escapes, 4 Direcction Throw K13 A1 Aikido Trap and Roll Escape Falls & Rolls, Hip Throw, Heel Pick B1 1 Mod.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Authenticated
    Ohio Administrative Code Rule 3773-7-01 Definitions. Effective: January 22, 2010 (A) Brazilian jiu-jitsu: Also known as "Gracie Jiu-Jitsu", it is a martial art developed in Brazil by the Gracie family during the mid-20th century. Originally based on the Japanese martial art of judo as it existed before WW II, it has since developed into an independent system with a major emphasis on ground fighting and grappling, these techniques may be used in mixed martial arts events. (B) Cage: A fenced enclosure in which some promotional organizations hold mixed martial arts competition. It may have four but not more than eight sides. (C) Fish-hooking: The action of hooking (grasping) and pulling the inside of an opponent's cheek so as to control his head movement. This is illegal. (D) Freestyle wrestling: An Olympic grappling sport which permits contestants to attack their opponent above and below the waist, these techniques may be used in mixed martial arts events. (E) Gi: The traditional uniform worn when practicing aikido; jujitsu; judo; and karate, may not be worn in mixed martial arts events. (F) Grappling: Techniques of throwing, locking, holding, and wrestling, as opposed to kicking and punching, these techniques may be used in mixed martial arts events. (G) Greco Roman wrestling: An Olympic grappling sport in which all holds are applied above the waist in an attempt to throw the opponent, these techniques may be used in mixed martial arts events. (H) Ground and pound: A MMA term which describes the barrage of strikes delivered by the contestant who is in his opponents guard or in the mount position.
    [Show full text]
  • ACD-Combatives / ACD-Hapkido / Self Defense / Control Tactics / Krav Maga
    ACD-Combatives / ACD-Hapkido / Self Defense / Control Tactics / Krav Maga ACD-Combatives / ACD-Hapkido / Self Defense / Control Tactics / Krav Maga ACD-Combatives (ACD Hapkido) Remember… the most important person on the mat is your training partner. ALWAYS respect your partner. SOME bumps & bruises in training is to be expected. NEVER injure your training partners. Respect & control in all things! We support ALL Law Enforcement, Fire, EMS, Dispatchers, Parole/Probation & the military. 합기도 A Brief History of Traditional Hapkido 합기도 Hapkido is a Korean Martial art that has been in existence since approximately 1945. When you translate it from Korean to English, it means "The way of coordinated power." To avoid any dispute about its historical origin, Hapkido was derived from much older Korean arts such as Tae Kyon (not to be confused with modern Tae Kwon Do), Hwa Rang Do, Yu-Sool (or Yoo-sool) and many feel its base influence comes from the Japanese art of Daito-Ryu Aiki-Ju Jitsu. Considering the Japanese occupied Korea from 1910 to 1945, this is very possible. Allegedly, Hapkido was first known as Hapkiyusool (or “Hapkiyoosool” /Translates to Aiki-Ju Jitsu in Japanese) and was founded by Grandmaster Choi Yong Sool. The art’s name was later changed to Hapkido. Like many Korean arts, (many already mentioned), Hapkido’s history is not completely clear and never totally agreed on by historians & Hapkido practitioners. I personally feel it really doesn’t matter, just enjoy the art. How Grand Master Choi Yong Sool may or may not have learned Aiki-Ju Jitsu is where all the historical fuss starts.
    [Show full text]