DOCSLIB.ORG

Marin County Parks 2018 Proposed Allowed Structural Pesticides Marin County Parks 2018 Proposed Special Use Structural Pesti

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marin County Parks 2018 Proposed Allowed Structural Pesticides Marin County Parks 2018 Proposed Special Use Structural Pesti Marin County Parks 2018 Proposed Allowed Structural Pesticides Line # Product Active Ingredient Type Signal EPA Reg # Derivation On Lists Primary Use Use Limitations Notes (Trade Name) Word OMRI Ground- Prop 65 EPA Carcino- water genicity 1 Eco PCO ACU 2-phenethyl Insecticide Caution 67425-14-AA Synthetic No No Not Listed Structural insects - crawling insects propionate, SF, OW 2 EcoExempt D phenethyl propionate, Insecticide Caution N/A Synthetic No No Not Listed Crawling insects Structural insects, exterior, clove oil eugenol, SF, EW, OW - Organic 3 EcoEXEMPT G Eugenol (Clove Insecticide; Caution N/A. U .S. Natural No Not Listed Not Listed EU Sow bug infestations under moist Granular material oil), Thyme oil "crustaceacide" Patent No. List conditions 6,004,569 4 Essentria IC3 Rosemary oil, Insecticide Caution N/A Natural No No Not Listed EU Crawling and flying insects Contains petroleum distillates. Geraniol, List Replaces EcoExempt IC2; PAN gives Peppermint oil all the active ingredients in this product a good review. 5 EVAC Botanical Balsam fir oil; other Repellant N/A 82016-1- Natural No No Not Listed Rodent repellent EVAC is an EPA reduced risk rodent repellent ingredients - fragrance 64405 biologically based pesticide. This oil, plant fibers product may have limited use and a low percentage of success, but it is one of the few alternative controls available to reduce rodent damage Marin County Parks 2018 Proposed Special Use Structural Pesticides Line # Product (Trade Active Ingredient Type Signal EPA Reg # Derivation On Lists Primary Use Use Limitations Notes Name) Word OMRI Ground- Prop 65 EPA Carcino- water genicity 1 Borid; orthoboric Boric acid SF, EW, Insecticide Caution 9444-129 Natural No No Not Listed Insects, roaches, ants, silverfish, termites Applied in cracks or crevices EU Endocrine Disruptor - Naturally acid a.i. = 99% OW, SS where public is excluded. occurring substance. Public health concerns from insects. 2 Concern Diatomaceous earth Insecticide Caution 50932 Natural Yes No Yes Not Listed Fleas, crawling insects Applied in cracks, crevices, Insecticide: naturally occurring Diatomaceous electrical boxes; where substance. Earth public is excluded. 3 DRAX Nutrabait; Boric acid SF, EW, Insecticide Caution 9444-131-AA Natural No No Not Listed Ants; public health concerns from Applied in cracks and other EU Endocrine Disruptor - Naturally orthoboric acid OW, SS insects areas where public is occurring substance, gel bait a.i. = 5%, excluded. 4 Gentrol IGR Hydroprene a.i. = 9%, Insecticide Caution 2724-351-ZA Synthetic No No Not Cockroaches, drain flies, bedbugs and Surface spray/paint brush, Insect Growth Regulator with SF classifiable as stored products pests crack and crevice treatment. petroleum distillates. to human carcinogenicit y 5 Max Force Ant Fipronil, SF, EW, OW, Insecticide Caution 432-1256 Synthetic No No Possible Insects, ants Applied in cracks or secured This product reduces the need for Gel, bait station SS Carcinogen bait stations; where public is spray treatment. a.i. = 0.001% excluded. 6 Max Force FC Fipronil, SF, EW, OW, Insecticide Caution 432-1257 Synthetic No No Possible Insects, roaches Applied in cracks or secured This product reduces the need for Roach Bait SS Carcinogen bait stations; where public is spray treatment. Station a.i. = excluded. 0.01% 7 MaxForce FC Ant Fipronil Insecticide Caution 432-1264 Synthetic No Possible No Data EU Ants This material will only be This product adds to the Killer Bait Gel Human List used in secured bait stations. effectiveness of the current bait Carcinogen station. 8 MaxForce FC Fipronil Insecticide Caution 432-1259 Synthetic No Possible No Data EU Roaches This material will only be This product adds to the Professional Human List used in secured bait stations. effectiveness of the current bait Insect Control Carcinogen station. Roach Killer Bait Gel Page 1 of 4 Line # Product Active Ingredient Type Signal EPA Reg # Derivation On Lists Primary Use Use Limitations Notes (Trade Name) Word OMRI Ground- Prop 65 EPA Carcino- water genicity Mother Earth D Diatomaceous earth, Insecticide Caution 499-509 Natural Yes No Yes Not Listed Fleas, crawling insects Applied in cracks or secured Naturally occurring substance. SF, OW, SC bait stations; where public is excluded. Niban Granular; Boric acid SF, EW, Insecticide, Caution 64405-2 Natural Yes No No Not Listed Insects, roaches, ants, silverfish, snails, Applied in cracks or secured EU Endocrine Disruptor - Naturally orthoboric acid OW, SS molluscicide slugs, earwigs bait stations in food occurring substance a.i. = 5% preparation areas; or other areas where the public is excluded. Public health concerns from insects. Perma-Dust Boric Acid Insecticide; Caution 499-384 Natural No Evidence of Not Listed EU Ants, roaches, pillbugs, sowbugs Perma Dust replaces Turbo Dust. "crustaceacide" Non- List carcinogeni city for humans Terro PCO Sodium tetraborate Insecticide Caution 149-8-64405 Synthetic No No Not Listed Insects, ants Applied in secured bait EU Endocrine Disruptor - Naturally decahydrate a.i. = stations only; where public is occurring substance. 5.4% excluded. Public health concerns from insects. Marin County Parks 2018 Proposed Exemption Required Structural Pesticides Line # Product (Trade Active Ingredient Type Signal EPA Reg # Derivation On Lists Primary Use Use Limitations Notes Name) Word OMRI Ground- Prop 65 EPA Carcino- water genicity 1 Rat Ice Carbon dioxide Rodenticide Warning 12455-148 Natural No No Rats For outdoor use only. Burrows being treated must be at least 10 feet away from buildings that are actively inhabited. Do not apply dry ice near any exterior door thresholds or nearby any building air intake vents or while people or animals are inhabiting building structure. 2 Tempo 20 WP cyfluthrin, EW a.i. = Insecticide Caution 3125-380-AA Synthetic No No Not likely to Fleas, termites, carpenter ants Certain structural situations, "Knockdown" product. Synthetic 20% be spot, crack and crevice pyrethroid; toxic to fish and bees. carcinogenic application. to humans Page 2 of 4 Marin County Parks 2018 Proposed Allowed Landscape Pesticides Line # Product Active Ingredient Type Signal EPA Reg # Derivation On Lists Primary Use Use Limitations Notes (Trade Name) Word OMRI Ground- Prop EPA water 65 Carcinogenicity 1 Agri-fos Phosphorous acid, SF Fungicide Caution 71962-1 Synthetic No No No Sudden Oak Death (SOD) treatment To only be used on high value trees in high risk areas that pose a threat if failure occurs. Not for use on wild land trees. 2 Avenger AG d-limonene 60% Herbicide Caution 82052-4 Natural Yes No No No Non-selected, post-emergent burndown This product replaces Green herbicide used to control weeds, Match grasses, and broadleaves 3 Azaguard Azadirachtin Insecticide Caution 70299-17 Natural Yes No No No Control of indoor and outdoor pests Acts as a repellent, antifeeding, and inference with molting. 4 Azatrol EC Azadirachtin insecticide Caution 2217-836 Natural Yes No No No Control of indoor and outdoor pests Acts as a repellent, antifeeding, and inference with molting 5 Civitas Mineral oil Herbicide Caution 69526-13 Synthetic No No No Fungicide and Insecticide for turf on golf courses, sports and athletic fields 6 Companion Bacillus subtilis Fungicide Caution 71065-3 Natural No No No To improve health and vigor of turf grass Used on a regular basis to at the golf course reduce the need for more toxic approaches to disease control 7 Competitor Ethyl oleate Surfactant Caution CA 2935- Natural No No No Used as a surfactant This is a non-chemical 50173 product not regulated by the EPA 8 Dipel Pro DF Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticide Caution 73049-39 Natural Yes No No No Used on golf course and sports turf to Grubs also attract crows and control sod web worms skunks which in turn tear up the turf while looking for tasty morsels 9 Envoy Plus Clethodim Herbicide Caution 59639-132 Synthetic No No No Used in areas where Goat grass has been difficult to eradicate 10 Finalsan Ammoniated soap of Herbicide Warning 67702-8- Natural Yes No No No Non-selective foliar applied for weed, A potential alternative to fatty acids 87865 grass, algae and moss glyphosate; potential to cause ocular injury to applicators 11 Fusilade II Fluazifop-P-butyl Herbicide Caution 100-1084 Synthetic No No No Used to reduce Bermuda grass in landscapes with high value plantings; also used in areas where Goat grass has been difficult to eradicate 12 Garlon 4 Ultra Triclopyr, SF Herbicide Caution 62719-527 Synthetic Possible No Group 'D' not Woody weeds Very limited use when Keep out of waterways classified as glyphosate is not effective carcinogenic 13 Habitat Imazapyr Herbicide Caution 241-426-A Synthetic Probable No No Needed as part of the Bay area wide Evidence of non- Spartina project. Also for use in cut carcinogenicity stump applications for invasive woody species ( Tree of Heaven and Mayten trees). 14 Liberate Lecithin, alcohol Surfactant Caution CA 34704- Natural No No No Use with Aquamaster and other ethoxylate 50030-AA materials needing a surfactant 15 Pentra-bark Polyethylene glycol, SF Surfactant Caution CA 83416- Synthetic No No No Surfactant for Agri-fos, used in To only be used on high 50001-AA combination for SOD treatment value trees in high risk areas that pose a threat if failure occurs. Not for use on wild land trees 16 PT Wasp Freeze II Prallethrin Insecticide Caution 499-550 Synthetic No No No Emergency wasp nest destruction for Four day pre-notice does not spray treatment of in ground or aerial apply
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Managing Insect and Mite Pests in Vegetable Gardens
    Managing Insect and Mite Pests in Vegetable Gardens egetable gardening is an enjoyable pastime. the surface of a leaf when feeding, while the same The result of your labors is fresh, home- caterpillar may eat great chunks of leaves when Vgrown produce. Frequently, growing your mature. own vegetables is even less expensive than buying An insectÕs mouthparts can be a key to under- not-so-fresh produce from the market. standing the type of damage caused by a pest. However, producing your own vegetables can be Insects with sucking mouthparts feed by piercing challenging. One of the greatest challenges is to suc- leaves or fruit. Damage appears as pock marks or cessfully control insect pests. Fortunately, there are mottled leaves. Insects with chewing mouthparts numerous management alternatives that vegetable chew holes in plants. If you can recognize the type gardeners may consider when dealing with insects of feeding, you can select the proper insecticides and other pests. These include cultural, biological, (i.e., stomach poisons for chewing insects). and management controls and, last but not least, chemical controls. Plan ahead Understanding insects When planning a vegetable garden, anticipate the pests that may occur during the year. Consider all There are approximately 30,000 insect species in management practices that will help deal with the Texas. Fortunately, fewer than 100 species are rou- pests before they become problems. Then, develop a tine pests in vegetable gardens. Most insects found management plan and put it into use before prob- in gardens are either incidental or beneficial, con- lems occur. Use your past experience as a guide in tributing to pollination, the balance of nature, or anticipating pests for the upcoming season.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Biorational and Natural Products for Vegetable Crop Management in Commercial Market Gardens and Home Gardens
    Report to the Ohio IPM Program on a Vegetable Team Project funded by the Ohio IPM Block Grant Program, 2005 Title: Evaluation of biorational and natural products for vegetable crop management in commercial market gardens and home gardens Investigators: Celeste Welty (entomologist), Sally Miller (plant pathologist), Doug Doohan (weed scientist); Mark Bennett, Matt Kleinhenz, Bob Precheur (horticulturists). Background: The insect pests and diseases that affect vegetable crops are the same whether grown on large farms for commercial production or on small diversified farms or home gardens, but the management tactics preferred by growers are often different for the different scale operations. Many market gardeners prefer to avoid using conventional pesticides because of concern about human safety and environmental contamination. During the past few years, many biorational crop protection products have become available. While it is known that biorational products are safer to humans than conventional pesticides, it is not known whether they are effective in controlling the target pests that they claim to control. In addition to products for insect and disease control, there are many products that promote plant growth, such as microbial soil inoculants. There is little to no unbiased data available on efficacy of these products. This deficit is a limiting factor in formulating up-to-date extension recommendations for market gardens and home gardens. This project was an important first step in the development of a set of recommended garden IPM tactics that will include cultural controls to prevent or delay pest problems, along with biological controls and selective chemical controls. Objective: To evaluate efficacy of biorational products that are available for vegetable crop management, in comparison with standard conventional materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Soil and Foliar-Applied Azadirachtin in Combination with and in Comparison to Soil-Applied Imidacloprid and Foliar-A
    is indicative of a trend that will spread Efficacy of Soil and Foliar-applied Azadirachtin to the pyrethroids, there will be a in Combination with and in Comparison to strong need to look for alternatives to broad-spectrum foliar-applied pes- Soil-applied Imidacloprid and Foliar-applied ticides. Studies that evaluate the abil- ity of pesticides to reduce damage Carbaryl Against Japanese Beetles on Roses on flowers and leaves could provide simultaneous estimates of efficacy on 1,2,3 1 highly preferred and somewhat less Justin M. Vitullo and Clifford S. Sadof preferred plant substrates. Imidacloprid is one of the most ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Popillia japonica, Rosa, systemic insecticide commonly used materials in land- scapes because of its activity against SUMMARY. This study evaluated azadirachtin and imidacloprid for their ability to leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae) and reduce injury by Japanese beetles [Popillia japonica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)] on floribunda-type roses (Rosa sp. ‘Acadia Sunrise’), either applied to foliage or as a soil its long residual toxicity (Sclar and drench. Roses were arranged in field plots and exposed to resident adult beetle Cranshaw, 1996; Webb et al., 2003). A populations. Insecticides were evaluated in field and laboratory trials. Laboratory single systemic application of imid- assays of leaves collected from plants 14 days after soil applications of azadirachtin acloprid reduced adelgid (Adelgidae) were less preferred by adult beetles than those collected from untreated controls. populations to zero on healthy east- Plants in field trials that received soil treatments of either imidacloprid or ern hemlock trees (Tsuga canadensis) azadirachtin had defoliation levels that were <8% throughout the entire season, up to 816 d after the application whereas untreated control plants were 20% defoliated.
    [Show full text]
  • OHA 8964 Technical Report: Marijuana Contaminant Testing
    TECHNICAL REPORT: OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY’S PROCESS TO DETERMINE WHICH TYPES OF CONTAMINANTS TO TEST FOR IN CANNABIS PRODUCTS, AND LEVELS FOR ACTION Author David G. Farrer, Ph.D. Public Health Toxicologist PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Technical Report: Oregon Health Authority’s Process to Determine Which Types of Contaminants to Test for in Cannabis Products, and Levels for Action* Author: David G. Farrer, Ph.D., Public Health Toxicologist Acknowledgments OHA would like to thank the following individuals and organizations for their valuable contributions to the development of cannabis testing Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR 333-7-0010 through 333-7-0100 and OAR 333-7-0400 and 333-7-0410 Exhibit A) and this report: Brian Boling Rose Kachadoorian Laboratory Program Manager Oregon Department of Agriculture Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Jeremy L. Sackett Cascadia Labs, Cannabis Safety Theodore R. Bunch, Jr. Institute, and Oregon Cannabis Pesticide Analytical and Response Association Center Coordination Leader Oregon Department of Agriculture Bethany Sherman Oregon Growers Analytical and Keith Crosby Cannabis Safety Institute Technical Director Synergistic Pesticide Lab Shannon Swantek Oregon Environmental Laboratory Ric Cuchetto Accreditation Program, Public The Cannabis Chemist Health Division, Oregon Health Authority Camille Holladay Lab Director Rodger B. Voelker, Ph.D. Synergistic Pesticide Lab Lab Director Oregon Growers Analytical Mowgli Holmes, Ph.D. Phylos Bioscience and Cannabis Safety Institute For information on this report, contact David Farrer at [email protected]. * Please cite this publication as follows: Farrer DG. Technical report: Oregon Health Authority’s process to decide which types of contaminants to test for in cannabis. Oregon Health Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Insecticide Classes and Characteristics
    Denver, CO | February 5 - 7, 2020 A Review of Insecticide Classes and Characteristics Whitney Cranshaw Colorado State University Common Types of Pesticides (Organisms Controlled) • Herbicides • Insecticides – Higher Plants – Insects • Algacides • Acaricides/ – Algae Miticides& Ticks • Fungicides • Molluscicides – Fungi – Slugs & Snails • Bactericides – Bacteria Classification of Insecticides Mode of Entry Classification of Insecticides Systemic or Not Systemic? Are they capable of moving within the plant? Distribution of C14 labeled Thiamethoxam™ 25WG after a foliar application to cucumber leaves 1 hour after application 8 hour after application 24 hour after application Slide Credit: N. Rechcigl Systemic insecticides applied to leaves Some systemic insecticide can move into plants when sprayed onto leaves. Some systemic insecticides can move into plant when applied to the roots. Most systemic insecticides will appear in highest concentration in the new growth Systemic insecticides applied to soil Systemic Insecticides • Capable of some translocation in plant • Range exists in ability to move in plant – Some limited to translaminar movement – Some broadly distribute in plant (usually to newer growth) • Systemic activity is limited to a small number of insecticides – Most neonicotinoids – Diamides (limited) – Abamectin (translaminar only) Systemic Insecticides • Capable of some translocation in plant • Range exists in ability to move in plant – Some limited to translaminar movement – Some broadly distribute in plant (usually to newer growth) • Systemic activity is limited to a small number of insecticides –Some organophophates –All neonicotinoids –Diamides (limited) –Avermectins (translaminar only) Translaminar movement – Insecticide can move through a leaf (but not necessarily to another leaf) Example: Foliar applications of abamectin (Avid) Essentially all systemic insecticide move primarily in the xylem of the plant.
    [Show full text]
  • PDP Pesticide History Years Each Pesticide Was Reported from 1991 - 2020
    USDA, AMS, S&T, MPD - Pesticide Data Program (PDP) 2 November 2020 PDP Pesticide History Years each pesticide was reported from 1991 - 2020 Pest Pesticide Name Code Years Pesticide was Reported 1,2,4-Triazole A68 2003 - 2007 1-Naphthol 382 1994 - 2000, 2003 - 2020 2,3,5-Trimethacarb A72 2020 2,4,5-T 312 2001 - 2016 2,4,5-TP AJE 2010 - 2013 2,4-D 026 1992 - 1998, 2002 - 2020 2,4-DB 317 1996 - 1997, 2003 - 2016, 2019 2,4-dimethyl aniline (2,4 DMA) AGQ 2007 - 2008 2,4-dimethylphenyl formamide (2,4-DMPF) AGR 2007 - 2012, 2016 - 2020 2,6-dichlorobenzamide 272 2010, 2017 2,6-DIPN AFZ 2016 - 2020 3,5-Dichloroaniline ABM 2003 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 512 1993 - 2020 3-ketocarbofuran 218 2001 - 2002 4,4-dibromobenzophenone AGS 2007 - 2008 4-Hydroxychlorothalonil ANM 2017 4-Hydroxydiphenylamine B19 1995 - 1997 5-Hydroxythiabendazole B28 1996 - 1997, 2003 - 2020 Abamectin 948 1994 - 1997, 1999, 2012 - 2020 Acephate 204 1991 - 2020 Acequinocyl AKS 2013 - 2015, 2020 Acetamiprid B80 2004 - 2020 Acetochlor 807 2001, 2003 - 2020 Acetochlor ethanesulfonic acid (ESA) ABN 2001 - 2013, 2017 Acetochlor oxanilic acid (OA) ABO 2001, 2003 - 2013 Acibenzolar S methyl B51 2003 - 2020 Acifluorfen 727 2003 - 2007, 2014 - 2017 Aclonifen D58 2017 - 2020 Acrinathrin A03 2012 - 2015, 2017 Afidopyropen F87 2020 Alachlor 227 1997 - 2020 Alachlor ethanesulfonic acid (ESA) ABP 2001 - 2013, 2017 Alachlor oxanilic acid (OA) ABQ 2001 - 2013 Aldicarb 167 1994 - 2020 Aldicarb sulfone 168 1994 - 2020 Aldicarb sulfoxide 169 1993 - 2020 Aldrin 001 1997 - 2020 Allethrin 002 1994, 1999
    [Show full text]
  • Salehzadeh, Areaf (2002) Effects of Azadirachtin on Insect and Mammalian Cultured Cells. Phd Thesis
    Salehzadeh, Areaf (2002) Effects of azadirachtin on insect and mammalian cultured cells. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3060/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Effects of azadirachtin on insect and mammalian cultured cells By Areaf Salehzadeh (M.Sc. Medical Entomology) (University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran) Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2002 UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow GI2 8QQ Scotland UK In the name of ALLAH Most gracious Most merciful Thanking Him With a full heart and devoted tongue II era My parents III Acknowledgement I would like to express my sincerest thanks to everyone who assisted me during the course of my work especially: Dr. R. H. C. Strang for his able guidance, unlimited encouragement and constructive criticism. It has been a great privilege to have worked with him. His co­ operation and support is highly appreciated; Prof. R. L.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Insecticides for Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2009
    E-7A 7-09 Suggested Insecticides for Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2009 This publication is to be used with E-7, Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley—2009. Suggested Insecticides for Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley D. L. Kerns and M. G Cattaneo* A committee of state and federal research scientists and Exten- these field tests met the minimum requirements as outlined in the sion specialists meets annually to review cotton pest management Guidelines for the Annual Entomology Research Review and Ex- research and management guidelines. Guidelines are revised at tension Guide Revision Conference. Products listed must conform this meeting to reflect the latest proven techniques for maximiz- to our performance standards and avoid undue environmental ing profits for the Texas cotton producer by optimizing inputs and consequences. production. Suggested insecticide use rates have exhibited sufficient effi- cacy in tests to be effective in providing adequate control in field Management of Cotton Pests situations. However, it is impossible to eliminate all risks. Condi- tions or circumstances that are unforeseen or unexpected may The proper management of cotton pests is dependent upon the result in less than satisfactory results. The Texas AgriLife Exten- use of pest management principles. Pest management does not sion Service will not assume responsibility for such risks. Such rely solely on insecticides. Therefore, the USER of this insert is responsibility shall be assumed by the user of this publication. strongly encouraged to refer to E-7 for discussion of pest biology, Suggested pesticides must be registered and labeled for use by the scouting techniques, economic thresholds, insecticide resistance Environmental Protection Agency and the Texas Department of management, conservation of existing natural control agents, Agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Repellency and Toxicity of Azadirachtin Against Granary Weevil Sitophilus Granarius L
    Repellency and toxicity of azadirachtin against granary weevil Sitophilus granarius L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Salima Guettal, Samir Tine, Fouzia Tine-Djebbar, Noureddine Soltani To cite this version: Salima Guettal, Samir Tine, Fouzia Tine-Djebbar, Noureddine Soltani. Repellency and toxicity of azadirachtin against granary weevil Sitophilus granarius L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Agriculture International, Agraria Press, Ltd., 2021. hal-03169471 HAL Id: hal-03169471 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03169471 Submitted on 15 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Public Domain 1 Repellency and toxicity of azadirachtin against granary weevil Sitophilus granarius L. 2 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Salima GUETTAL1.2, Samir TINE1.2, Fouzia TINE-DJEBBAR 1.2*, & Noureddine SOLTANI32 4 1Laboratory of water and Environment, Larbi Tebessi University, Tébessa, Algeria 5 2 Laboratory of Applied Animal Biology, University Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria 6 7 Email: [email protected] 8 9 Abstract: The granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is 10 known as a primary pest; and is able to feed on whole and undamaged cereal grains. This pest 11 is probably one of the most destructive stored-product insect pests throughout the world 12 affecting the quantity as well as quality of the grains.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Christmas Tree Insecticide Miticide Update
    Revised May 2010 Insecticides & Miticides for PA Christmas Tree Pests PA Dept. of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry ALWAYS READ THE PRODUCT LABEL. THE LABEL IS THE LAW. CONSULT THE LABEL TO TARGET THE MOST APPROPRIATE LIFESTAGE OF THE PEST. For all pests, any recommendations for control are listed near the pest name. (Document Key: Active Ingredient (in bold) = Bio-rational Product) Active Ingredients Adelgids (Cooley Spruce Gall, E. Spruce Gall, Pine Bark) Carbaryl, Chlorpyrifos, Deltamethrin, Endosulfan, Imidacloprid, Oxydemeton- For controlling Pine Bark Adelgid, apply specifically labeled products methyl, Paraffinic Oil (Emulsified), Petroleum Oil, Potassium Salts of Fatty from late April through May, when adelgids are active. To control Acids over-wintering forms, apply Damoil before new growth starts. Cooley Spruce Gall Adelgids on Douglas-fir and Colorado Spruce and Eastern Spruce Gall Adelgid on Norway Spruce are best controlled in the over-wintering stage. Thorough coverage, including inner branches, is essential. Spray from mid-September through early October, or just before bud break in the spring, when temperatures are above 60°F. After bud break, chemical controls are not effective. If only a few galls are present, pruning and destroying unopened green galls before mid-July is recommended. Aphids (Balsam Twig, Cinara sp., Spotted Pine, W. Pine) Abamectin, Acephate, Acetamiprid, Azadirachtin, Beauveria bassiana ATCC Control over-wintering forms with Damoil or Ultra-Fine Oil. When 74040, Bifenthrin, Carbaryl, Chlorpyrifos,
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition and Management of Pesticide Poisonings Is an Up- Date and Expansion of the 1989 Fourth Edition
    R ECOGNITION AND M ANAGEMENT OF P ESTICIDE POISONINGS Fifth Edition, 1999 J. Routt Reigart, M.D. Professor of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina James R. Roberts, M.D., M.P.H. Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina Support for this publication was provided by: Certification and Worker Protection Branch Field and External Affairs Division Office of Pesticide Programs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street SW (7506C) Washington, DC 20460 For additional copies or more information: Tel: 703-305-7666 Fax: 703-308-2962 The manual is available in electronic format on the Internet at: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/safety/healthcare Acknowledgments We are grateful to the Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, for giving us the opportunity to collaborate on this new edition. Our thanks go to Kevin Keaney, Acting Branch Chief, for his support and vision, and for giving this publication priority attention. Particular mention should also be made of the efforts of Jerome M. Blondell, Ph.D., M.P.H., and Ameesha Mehta, M.P.H., whose oversight and constant assistance were invaluable in moving this project forward. Ana Maria Osorio, M.D., M.P.H., contributed Chapter 3, Environmental and Occupational History, to this manual. Experts in clinical toxicology conducted critical reviews of draft material. We are greatly appreciative of the time and effort of the following reviewers: Jeffery Lloyd Burgess, M.D., M.P.H. Assistant Professor Environmental Occupational Health Unit University of Arizona Prevention Center Matthew C. Keifer, M.D., M.P.H. Assistant Professor Department of Medicine/Environmental Health University of Washington Wayne R.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Turf Golf Courses Commercial Turf and Golf Course Insect Control
    COMMERCIAL TURF AND GOLF COURSE INSECT CONTROL The following table provides commercial turf and golf course insect control recommendations with pesticides for use by professional applicators. All chemical information provided below is given with the understanding that no endorsement of named products is intended nor is criticism implied of similar products that are not mentioned. Individuals who use pesticides are responsible for ensuring that the intended use complies with current regulations and conforms to the product label. Before purchasing or using any pesticide, always read and carefully follow the label directions. Insecticides listed below are identified by common chemical name. A trade name in parentheses may also be listed as a convenience for the reader. Amount Per Pest Insecticide and Formulation 1,000 Square Feet Comments/Precautions Ant bifenthrin* (Menace, Talstar, others) 0.5-1 fl oz Use GC formulation for golf courses. F, GC and G formulations also available bifenthrin 0.058% + carbaryl 2.3% (Duocide) 4-8 lb Not for use on golf courses and sod farms. Product must be watered in immediately after application to lawns. DO NOT apply more than 4 times per year to lawns. The minimum reapplication interval to lawns is 7 days. Will only kill pests present at the time of application. Pest must be directly contacted to be effective. carbaryl* (Sevin 80 WSP) see label chlorpyrifos* (Nufarm Chlorpyrifos) see label See label. For use on golf course turf, turf and ornamentals around industrial buildings and turf and ornamentals in road medians. Restricted Use Pesticide. clothianidin + bifenthrin (Aloft) see label GC SC 0.27-0.44 fl oz LC SC 0.27-0.54 fl oz GC G 1.8-3.6 lb LC G 1.8-3.6 lb cyfluthrin (Tempo 2) 0.143 fl oz Home lawns only.
    [Show full text]