DOCSLIB.ORG

Front Matter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Front Matter The Congress of Phoenix Rethinking Atlantic Security and Economics Edited by Gerald Frost The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. 1998 Available in the United States from the AEI Press, c/o Publisher Resources Inc., 1224 Heil Quaker Blvd., P.O. Box 7001, La Vergne, TN 37086-7001; call toll free 1-800-269-6267. Distributed outside the United States by arrangement with Eurospan, 3 Henrietta Street, London WC2E 8LU En- gland. ISBN 0-8447-4052-7 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 © 1998 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Wash- ington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in cases of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publica- tions of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. THE AEI PRESS Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute 1150 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Printed in the United States of America Contents INTRODUCTION, Gerald Frost 1 PART ONE KEYNOTE SPEECHES IS THE ATLANTIC COMMUNITY OBSOLETE? Paul Wolfowitz 7 DEFENDING THE TRANSATLANTIC WORLD, Jon L. Kyl 20 SHAPING THE WEST’S DEFENSES FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, Margaret Thatcher 29 PART TWO COMMENTARY THE NEW ATLANTIC INITIATIVE, Christopher DeMuth 41 THE NATURE OF ATLANTICISM, Christopher DeMuth, Jon L. Kyl, Charles Powell, Max M. Kampelman, Michael Zantovsky, Brian Beedham, and John O’Sullivan 42 U.S.-EUROPEAN TIES, Thomas J. Duesterberg 49 EUROPEAN POLITICAL INTEGRATION, Charles Powell, Richard Burt, Dan Quayle, and Margarita Mathiopoulos 51 iii CONTENTS A CHANGING BALANCE OF POWER, Max M. Kampelman, Josef Joffe, and Margarita Mathiopoulos 53 NATO REFORM, Christopher Cox, William E. Odom, Rainer Schuwirth, and Richard N. Perle 55 MEANS AND RATIONALE FOR NATO ENLARGEMENT, Mark P. Lagon, Jeremy D. Rosner, Mira Baratta, Ojars Kalnins, Douglas J. Feith, Bruce P. Jackson, Valois V. Pavlovskis, Charles Gati, Maciej Kozlowski, Josef Joffe, Brian Beedham, William E. Odom, and Dan Quayle 58 COSTS OF NATO ENLARGEMENT, Jeremy D. Rosner, Robert Mroziewicz, Réka A. Szemerkényi, K. Eric Tygesen, Kalev Stoicescu, and Maciej Kozlowski 67 THE NATO-RUSSIA FOUNDING ACT, Christopher Cox, Michael Zantovksy, Peter W. Rodman, Josef Joffe, Richard N. Perle, Brian Beedham, Rainer Schuwirth, Frank J. Gaffney, Jr., and Charles Gati 73 RUSSIA, Christopher Cox, Max M. Kampelman, Radek Sikorski, Josef Joffe, Brian Beedham, William E. Odom, Dorel Sandor, Martin Sieff, and Dan Quayle 79 UKRAINE AND THE BALTICS, Christopher Cox, Anton D. Buteyko, Ojars Kalnins, Martin Sieff, and Dan Quayle 86 BOSNIA, Max M. Kampelman and Richard N. Perle 88 TURKEY, Richard Burt, Norman Stone, and Margarita Mathiopoulos 89 MISSILE PROLIFERATION AND STRATEGIC DEFENSE, Martin Sieff and Dan Quayle 91 CHINA, Dan Quayle 93 APPENDIX A: AGENDA FOR THE CONGRESS OF PHOENIX 95 APPENDIX B: ATTENDEES 99 EDITOR AND CONTRIBUTORS 103 iv Introduction Gerald Frost A word of historical background may be helpful to those not famil- iar with the origins or activities of the New Atlantic Initiative (NAI). This is a nongovernmental network comprising scholars, former and current public servants, business leaders, and journalists reflecting a wide range of political beliefs and allegiances. It came into existence out of a common apprehension that because of the prevailing mood of introspection on both sides of the Atlantic, Europe and America would drift apart—to the profound detriment of both—unless a se- rious and sustained attempt was made to apply Atlanticist principles to the conditions of the post–cold war era. A busy program of conferences, meetings, and publications helped establish three fundamental aims: to anchor the new—in some cases still fragile—democracies of Central and Eastern Europe more securely to Western institutions, to ensure that the European Union’s political development proceeded in a way that did not damage U.S.- European relations, and to create a transatlantic free trade area. The pages that follow comprise the edited text of the Congress of Phoenix held under the auspices of the NAI on May 16–18, 1997, with the aim of defining the means by which these objectives might be met. The congress program and a list of participants are contained in the appendixes. In preparing the text for publication, I have aimed to provide an accessible guide to the views of participants on central themes and topics that will have an appeal extending beyond merely those who were present at the congress. For this reason, the text has been 1 INTRODUCTION organized by subject rather than chronologically, although the key- note addresses by Margaret Thatcher, Jon L. Kyl, and Paul Wolfowitz have been given in their original form; my apologies are due to con- tributors if the form and shape of their remarks have suffered in the process or if some original nuances have been lost. They are owed in equal measure to those whose comments could not be accommo- dated within the present format. As the title implies, the purpose of the Congress of Phoenix was to stimulate public debate about ways of strengthening the in- stitutions of Atlantic cooperation so that they meet the needs of a greatly altered economic and security environment. As one partici- pant pointed out, the road to hell may well be paved with new inten- tions: it is therefore important to stress that the “new” in the title of the New Atlantic Initiative should not be seen as implying a desire for novelty; it is the initiative and circumstances of international poli- tics that are new, not Atlanticism or the principles underlying it. The aim of the NAI is to help sustain both. A year earlier, at the Congress of Prague, the first major public event staged by the NAI, those taking part had expressed a common fear: that while history remained open and therefore susceptible to efforts to change its course in this, or indeed, other directions, this situation would not last indefinitely. As a result, there was a serious danger that through inertia and neglect, a unique opportunity to expand the area of human liberty and promote structures serving the interests of international stability was being lost. Meanwhile, the nations of Eastern and Central Europe remained in a kind of politi- cal limbo, unsure of their own futures as well as the intentions and wishes of the political community that they had bravely struggled to join during the cold war years. But by the time discussion of such matters moved from the glit- tering chambers of the Cernin Palace to the air-conditioned luxury of the Arizona Biltmore, it was clear that a start had been made in laying the institutional foundations of the post–cold war order. Evi- dence for this could be found in the detailed and authoritative ac- counts by representatives of the U.S. and European governments of the plans—to be announced at the Madrid Summit in July—to begin the negotiations to admit the first new applicants to NATO. That aspiration had enjoyed the ardent support of nearly all those involved with the NAI since its beginnings. Equally welcome were the accounts from representatives of the 2 GERALD FROST Polish, Hungarian, and Czech governments of the steps being taken to meet their expected obligations as new NATO members and their estimates of the likely costs involved. News that a NATO-Russia Founding Act, copies of which cir- culated rapidly among participants following its signing just days earlier, would reportedly allow Russia influence over NATO secu- rity arrangements, received rather more mixed responses. Those ranged by degree from the assertion that, given Western prudence, the document would provide an improved channel of cooperation and communications with Russia to the view that it was in fact a cold war stratagem: the tortured prose might have been smartened up to meet the new circumstances, but the aim was still to under- mine and destroy NATO. NATO enlargement, the most suitable means to preserve NATO cohesion and clarity of purpose in the wake of a historic victory, and the likely impact of the Founding Act were inevitably the subjects that dominated discussion. But some of the most interesting debate focused on the future political development of Russia, the impact of Asian economic strength on the international order, and the chal- lenge presented by an increasingly powerful China; there were also stimulating debates on the effectiveness of economic sanctions and on institutional constraints to economic growth. It is not possible to convey the full range of opinions expressed at Phoenix in this brief publication. It will have fulfilled its purpose, however, if it conveys the views of those present on a range of issues whose outcome will shape a still fluid international order at a re- markably interesting stage of history. It will have fulfilled a second important function if it provides a footnote to an attempt to ensure that that future reflects both the best traditions of Atlantic engage- ment and the values upon which the Atlantic Community is based. 3 PART ONE Keynote Speeches Is the Atlantic Community Obsolete? Paul Wolfowitz I have chosen to address the question of whether the Atlantic Com- munity is obsolete. It might be thought that we have already an- swered that question by coming all the way to Phoenix to discuss how to deepen the Atlantic Community. Nevertheless, it is worth thinking about whether and why the Atlantic Community is still rel- evant in an era very different from those earlier ones in which the Atlantic Community proudly triumphed, first over fascism and Na- zism and later over communism.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Winter 2009 Licata Lecture: Michael Novak Calls for Conversation About God
    WINTER 2009 LICATA LECTURE: MICHAEL NOVAK CALLS FOR CONVERSATION ABOUT GOD And yet, he told his Pepperdine audi- ence faith is a “real knowledge—a practi- cal kind of knowledge worth trusting one’s life to.” Faith was the sustaining hope of those who struggled against totalitarian- ism in the 20th century. It is the basis for a compassionate society. Rather than con- tradicting the sciences, faith is a firm sup- Victor Davis Hanson port on which reason may flourish. 2009 William E. Simon As men and women continue to ask ques- Distinguished Visiting Professor tions about faith and secularism, people in both camps may become more tolerant of Scholar of classical civilizations, author, each other. Novak echoed the prediction columnist, and historian Victor Davis Hanson of the German philosopher Habermas that is serving as the Spring 2009 William E. we are at the “end of the secular age.” Simon Distinguished Visiting Professor at the Now, “believers and unbelievers will have School of Public Policy. He is teaching the to take each other much more seriously seminar in international relations: Global Rule than they did before.” of Western Civilization? In an era when our public discourse Hanson is a Senior Fellow in Residence in “VIRTUALLY ALL THE WORLD seems to lack civility, Novak foresees “the Classics and Military History at the Hoover end of the period of condescension” and Institution at Stanford University and IS IN THE GRIP OF QUESTIONS “the beginning of a conversation that rec- Professor Emeritus of Classics at California ABOUT GOD,”… ognizes each others’ inherent dignity.” State University, Fresno.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jewish Idea: Morality, Politics, and Theology Tikvah Summer Fellowship for College Students
    THE TIKVAH FUND 165 E. 56th Street New York, New York 10022 The Jewish Idea: Morality, Politics, and Theology Tikvah Summer Fellowship for College Students June 18–July 31, 2015 Calendar The Jewish Idea: Morality, Politics, and Theology June 18–21, 2015 THE MODERN JEWISH CONDITION: A CONVERSATION Thursday, June 18 Friday, June 19 Saturday, June 20 Sunday, June 21 Candle lighting at 8:12 PM Breakfast Breakfast Breakfast 9:30 AM – 10:00 AM 8:30 AM – 9:30 AM 8:45 AM – 9:30 AM Travel to Glen Cove, NY Shacharit Nationhood and Vulnerability William Kristol 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM 9:30 AM – 12:00 PM 9:30 AM – 12:00 PM Lunch Lunch Lunch and Callings and Careers III: Abe Socher 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM 12:30 PM – 2:00 PM Tradition and Progress Authority and Interpretation Back to NYC Ruth Wisse Abe Socher 2:15 PM 1:00 PM – 3:30 PM 1:00 PM – 3:30 PM Callings and Careers I: Mincha William Kristol 4:00 PM – 5:30 PM 6:00 PM Welcome Dinner and Mincha, Kabbalat Shabbat, Dinner Introductions Maariv 6:30 PM Callings and Careers II: Ruth Wisse 7:00 PM – 8:15 PM 7:45 PM – 9:15 PM Dinner Havdalah 6:00 PM – 8:30 PM 8:15 PM 9:21 PM The Jewish Idea: Morality, Politics, and Theology June 22–26, 2015 REASON, REVELATION , AND MODERNITY Monday, June 22 Tuesday, June 23 Wednesday, June 24 Thursday, June 25 Friday, June 26 Candle lighting at 8:13 PM Breakfast Breakfast Breakfast Breakfast Writing (Tikvah is open for study and writing) 8:30 AM – 9:45 AM 8:30 AM – 9:45 AM 8:30 AM – 9:45 AM 8:30 AM – 9:45 AM “Why We Remain “Progress or Return?” I Preceptorial
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks at the Opening of the North Atlantic Council Meeting on Kosovo April 23, 1999
    Administration of William J. Clinton, 1999 / Apr. 23 that is doing so much to reduce crime on our By taking actions to prevent future acts of streets to our schools. Today I’m pleased to violence in our schools, we can best honor the announce the first of the grants funding these memories of those who lost their lives. community police will be awarded to 336 Thank you very much. schools and communities to help hire more than 600 police officers. Like their counterparts on Legislative Initiatives/Kosovo the streets, these school officers will work close- Q. Mr. President, you didn’t mention gun ly with the citizens they serve, with students, control. Are you going to do more on gun con- teachers, and parents, to improve campus secu- trol? rity, to counsel troubled youth, to mediate con- Q. To be clear, sir, do all hostilities in Kosovo flicts before they escalate into violence. have to end before there can be consideration I want to thank Senator Chuck Robb for his of ground troops, sir? strong leadership on this issue. By the end of The President. First of all, I know you under- the year we hope to have 2,000 new officers stand I’ve got to run over there and meet all in our schools, and I encourage all communities the people who are coming. We will have more to apply for these grants. legislative initiatives to announce in the days I also want to take this opportunity to remind ahead. As I said a couple of days ago, we will communities that they have until June 1st to have some legislative responses and efforts we apply for the Federal Safe Schools-Healthy Stu- have been working on for some time, actually.
    [Show full text]
  • Disraeli and the Early Victorian ‘History Wars’ – Daniel Laurie-Fletcher
    Disraeli and the Early Victorian ‘History Wars’ – Daniel Laurie-Fletcher FJHP Volume 25 (2008 ) Disraeli and the Early Victorian ‘History Wars’ Daniel Laurie-Fletcher Flinders University The American historian, Gertrude Himmelfarb, once put the question: ‘Who now reads Macaulay?’ Her own reply to the rhetorical question was: Who, that is, except those who have a professional interest in him–and professional in a special sense: not historians who might be expected to take pride in one of their most illustrious ancestors, but only those who happen to be writing treatises about him. In fact, most professional historians have long since given up reading Macaulay, as they have given up writing the kind of history he wrote and thinking about it as he did. i The kind of history and thinking Himmelfarb was referring to is the ‘Whig interpretation of history’ which is one based on a grand narrative that demonstrated a path of inevitable political and economic progress, a view made famous by the Whig politician and historian Thomas Babington Macaulay (1800-1859). ii In his History of England: From the Accession of James II (1848-1860), Macaulay maintained that the development of political institutions of the nation had brought increased liberties accompanied by the growth of economic prosperity. Macaulay’s study was begun when the educated classes of early Victorian Britain held a widespread fear of a French-style revolution during a time of extensive social, economic and political change. Many, in order to cope with such changes, looked to British history to yield role models as well as cautionary tales of what to avoid in creating a better society.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H
    Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I New Direction MMXX CONTENTS Hannes H. Gissurarson is Professor of Politics at the University of Iceland and Director of Research at RNH, the Icelandic Research Centre for Innovation and Economic Growth. The author of several books in Icelandic, English and Swedish, he has been on the governing boards of the Central Bank of Iceland and the Mont Pelerin Society and a Visiting Scholar at Stanford, UCLA, LUISS, George Mason and other universities. He holds a D.Phil. in Politics from Oxford University and a B.A. and an M.A. in History and Philosophy from the University of Iceland. Introduction 7 Snorri Sturluson (1179–1241) 13 St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) 35 John Locke (1632–1704) 57 David Hume (1711–1776) 83 Adam Smith (1723–1790) 103 Edmund Burke (1729–1797) 129 Founded by Margaret Thatcher in 2009 as the intellectual Anders Chydenius (1729–1803) 163 hub of European Conservatism, New Direction has established academic networks across Europe and research Benjamin Constant (1767–1830) 185 partnerships throughout the world. Frédéric Bastiat (1801–1850) 215 Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) 243 Herbert Spencer (1820–1903) 281 New Direction is registered in Belgium as a not-for-profit organisation and is partly funded by the European Parliament. Registered Office: Rue du Trône, 4, 1000 Brussels, Belgium President: Tomasz Poręba MEP Executive Director: Witold de Chevilly Lord Acton (1834–1902) 313 The European Parliament and New Direction assume no responsibility for the opinions expressed in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    NOTES Introduction 1. Robert Kagan to George Packer. Cited in Packer’s The Assassin’s Gate: America In Iraq (Faber and Faber, London, 2006): 38. 2. Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neoconservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004): 9. 3. Critiques of the war on terror and its origins include Gary Dorrien, Imperial Designs: Neoconservatism and the New Pax Americana (Routledge, New York and London, 2004); Francis Fukuyama, After the Neocons: America At the Crossroads (Profile Books, London, 2006); Ira Chernus, Monsters to Destroy: The Neoconservative War on Terror and Sin (Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, CO and London, 2006); and Jacob Heilbrunn, They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons (Doubleday, New York, 2008). 4. A report of the PNAC, Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, September 2000: 76. URL: http:// www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf (15 January 2009). 5. On the first generation on Cold War neoconservatives, which has been covered far more extensively than the second, see Gary Dorrien, The Neoconservative Mind: Politics, Culture and the War of Ideology (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1993); Peter Steinfels, The Neoconservatives: The Men Who Are Changing America’s Politics (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1979); Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005); Murray Friedman ed. Commentary in American Life (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 2005); Mark Gerson, The Neoconservative Vision: From the Cold War to the Culture Wars (Madison Books, Lanham MD; New York; Oxford, 1997); and Maria Ryan, “Neoconservative Intellectuals and the Limitations of Governing: The Reagan Administration and the Demise of the Cold War,” Comparative American Studies, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Framework
    Ascendancy to Power – a Structural Realist Account of the Neo-Conservatives’ Rising Influence Over American Foreign Policy By Elvin Gjevori Submitted to Central European University Department of International Relations and European Studies In Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations and European Studies Supervisor: Professor Erin Kristin Jenne CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2007 (17,238 words) i Abstract Neo-conservatism is a doctrine that has been increasingly analyzed and debated in the last years because of its growing influence on the foreign policy of the United States. Despite the growing body of scholarship on the movement, little or no attention has been paid to the structural causes of the neocons’ success in influencing U.S. foreign policy, with most authors focused on personalities and historical moments to account for their increasing influence on American foreign policy. In contrast to accounts that rely on historically contingent events, this thesis provides a structural realist account of the growing influence of the neo-conservative ideology on American foreign policy in the later part of the twentieth century and at the turn of the twenty-first century. The thesis shows that the ascendancy of neocons to power is best understood by analyzing the permissive structural conditions of the international system after the end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the USSR. CEU eTD Collection ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................................II
    [Show full text]
  • The Trump-Russia Collusion Case
    The Trump-Russia Collusion Case Updated to August 2020 Source: http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/trumptraitor.html For those who have been following this page for a while: my main target is not Trump, my target is Putin. Putin, not Trump, is the most dangerous person in the world. Trump is just a lackey, a small-time crook and bit-time liar whom Putin is using to attack the USA. The problem is not that there is no evidence of Trump-Putin collusion, the problem is that there is too much of it. I have added some background about the motive of Russia's interference in US politics. In my opinion, it was not only a general attempt at undermining US institutions (that came later) but originally it was a determined effort to make sure that Hillary Clinton did not become president. Putin feared her more than anyone else. For those who have NOT followed this page from the beginning: this website was one of the first to talk about the Trump-Russia collusion at a time when few dared mention the Steele dossier. Just to be very clear: this is not about whether Russia's interference changed the results of the election (i personally think that the FBI investigation into Clinton's email server had a much bigger impact). It is about Putin's strategy to attack the USA, and, secondly, it is about the extent of Trump's collaboration with Putin. And, just to be fair, Putin's Russia is not the only country that ever interfered in US politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Nooit Meer Auschwitz Lezing 2017
    Nooit Meer Auschwitz Lezing 2017 by Professor dr. Timothy D. Snyder Amsterdam, 25 januari 2017 NEDERLANDS AUSCHWITZ COMITÉ Nooit Meer Auschwitz Lezing 2017 by Professor dr. Timothy D. Snyder Amsterdam, 25 januari 2017 2 Timothy D. Snyder Auschwitz Never Again Lecture 3 Laudatio Annetje Fels-Kupferschmid Award 2017 Timothy Snyder Excellencies, distinguished guests, friends, ladies and gentlemen, “Conventional wisdom is like a sheet of ice, covering the dark sea of the undiscovered”. “Does the narrative [offered by the historian] move like an icebreaker?” “Does it leave in its wake a view of the deep, black line through white ice – a passage, that others may follow?” These words come from one of the books by Professor Timothy Snyder. I thank the jury of the Annetje Fels-Kupferschmidt Award for asking me to talk about this scholar and public intellectual, whose work I have been following for fifteen years. The quoted passage applies very well to him. Through his consistently excellent publications and presentations, about the Holocaust and mass violence in general, all of which receiving a huge audience, Timothy Snyder has indeed been just that – an icebreaker. More than anyone else, this laureate of the award has brought together two distinct scholarly universes. There is the universe of Holocaust Studies and German Studies, on the one hand. And there is the universe of scholarship on Eastern Europe under Communist rule, on the other. More convincingly and effectively than anyone else, Snyder has drawn the attention of specialists and laypeople alike to the lands of Europe where the regimes of Hitler and Stalin committed mass murder.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction of Domestic Reindeer Into Alaska
    M * Vice-President Stevenson. Mrs. Stevenson. Governor and Mrs. Sheakley. Teachers and Pupils, Presbyterian Mission School, Sitka, Alaska. 54th Congress, SENATE. f Document 1st Session. \ No. 111. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. REPO R T ON WITH MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS, MY SHELDON JACKSON, GENERAL AGENT OF EDUCATION IN ALASKA. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1896. CONTENTS. Page. Action of the Senate of the United States. 5 Letter of the Secretary of the Interior to the President of the Senate. 7 Report of Dr. Sheldon Jackson, United States general agent of education in Alaska, to the Commissioner of Education, on the introduction of domestic reindeer i nto A1 aska for 1895. 9 Private benefactions. 11 Appropriations of Congress. 13 Importation of Lapps. 14 Distribution of reindeer. 15 Possibilities of the future. 16 Effect upon the development of Alaska. 16 Disbursements. 18 APPENDIXES. Report of William Hamilton on the itinerary of 1895. 21 Annual report of William A. Kjellmann. 42 Trip to Lapland. 43 Arrival at Teller Reindeer Station. 54 Statistics of the herd.. 55 Fining a reindeer thief. 57 Breaking in deer. 60 The birth of fawns. 61 Milking. 63 Eskimo dogs. 63 Herders and apprentices. 65 Rations. 72 Reindeer dogs. 73 Harness. 75 The Lapps. 77 Sealing. 78 Fishing. 79 Eskimo herd. 80 Sickness. 82 School. 82 Buildings. 83 Police. 84 Christmas. 85 Skees. 85 Physician. 88 Fuel. 89 Annual report of W. T. Lopp, Cape Prince of Wales, herd... 91 Letter of J. C. Widstead to Dr. Sheldon Jackson. 93 Letter of Dr. Sheldon Jackson to Hon. W.
    [Show full text]
  • We Welcome Your Support in Our Nonpartisan War on Waste. It's Your
    PAID ADVERTISEMENT President Donald J. Trump The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, In our previous two communications in The Wall Street Journal, we called attention to the lurking threat our country faces from an exploding national debt fueled by runaway government spending. We urged you to lead a national campaign to restore fi scal soundness to our great country by waging a nonpartisan War on Waste. From a recent U.S. Government Accountability Offi ce report*: “Since 2003…cumulative improper payment estimates have totaled about $1.4 trillion.” $1,400,000,000,000. Examples of improper payments are payments to doctors with suspended or revoked medical licenses or to people identifi ed as deceased in federal death fi les. A War on Waste is long overdue. We respectfully recommend that you announce to the nation that you are beginning a four-step War on Waste, that stamping out profl igate government spending is a top priority of your administration. Step 1 – Start a Transparency Revolution Publicize every White House expenditure. Direct every department and agency in your administration to follow suit. Classifi ed expenditures would be excluded. Transparency will be a culture-changing force. It will revolutionize government. It will infl uence how people vote. Knowing there is nowhere to hide will motivate politicians to earn votes with fi scal prudence rather than wasting taxpayer dollars by buying votes. We are living in the Information Age and the Big Data world. There is no reason why every government expenditure should not be public, accessible to the voting public via cell phone, computer, and iPad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aspen Institute Germany ANNUAL REPORT 2007 2008 the Aspen Institute 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2007 2008 the Aspen Institute ANNUAL REPORT 2007 3 2008
    The Aspen Institute Germany ANNUAL REPORT 2007 2008 The Aspen Institute 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2007 2008 The Aspen Institute ANNUAL REPORT 2007 3 2008 Dear Friend of the Aspen Institute In the following pages you will find a report on the Aspen Institute Germany’s activities for the years 2007 and 2008. As you may know, the Aspen Institute Germany is a non-partisan, privately supported organization dedicated to values-based leadership in addressing the toughest policy challenges of the day. As you will see from the reports on the Aspen European Strategy Forum, Iran, Syria, Lebanon and the Balkans that follow, a significant part of Aspen’s current work is devoted to promoting dialogue between key stakeholders on the most important strategic issues and to building lasting ties and constructive exchanges between leaders in North America, Europe and the Near East. The reports on the various events that Aspen convened in 2007 and 2008 show how Aspen achieves this: by bringing together interdisciplinary groups of decision makers and experts from business, academia, politics and the arts that might otherwise not meet. These groups are convened in small-scale conferences, seminars and discussion groups to consider complex issues in depth, in the spirit of neutrality and open mindedness needed for a genuine search for common ground and viable solutions. The Aspen Institute organizes a program on leadership development. In the course of 2007 and 2008, this program brought leaders from Germany, Lebanon, the Balkans and the United States of America together to explore the importance of values-based leadership together with one another.
    [Show full text]