Download This

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download This NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-O018 (Rev. 8-86) J- United States Department of the Interior National Park Service LRJ National Register of Historic Places 91990" Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines tor Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Old Seaboard Air Line Railway Station other names/site number 8 BD 0 0 1 2 8 2. Location street & number 1300 West Hillsboro Boulevard N/AJ not f°r publication city, town Deerfield Beach N/UJ vicinity state Florida code FL county Broward code FLO 11 zip code ^44?. 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I I private C3building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I I public-local [ I district 1 n buildings GD public-State I I site ____ ____ sites I I public-Federal [~~1 structure _____ 1 structures [ I object ____ ____ objects 1 i Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously ______N/A______________ listed in the National Register Q______ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this UK] nomination LJ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Regfeter of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my c^gijniem, the property S magjjjC'ELJ does not meetjhe National Register criteria. LJSee continuajjory^et^-^r, Signature of certyftSffc} official •^ /^^ Dfte George W. Percy, State rfistorir. Preservation fiffi<~^r State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property LJ meets LJdoes not meet the National Register criteria. LJsee continuation sheet. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 5. National Park Service Certification I, hereby, certify that this property is: H0 entered in the National Register. I I See continuation sheet. Undetermined eligible for the National Register. [__] See continuation sheet. I I determined not eligible for the National Register. I I removed from the National Register. CU other, (explain:) __________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action T 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (enter categories from instructions) TRANSPORTATION-Tra j n depot TRANSPORTATION-Train 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (enter categories from instructions) (enter categories from instructions) foundation concrete Mediterranean Revival walls ceramic tile, stnr.r.o roof ceramic tile, asphalt other ________________________ Describe present and historic physical appearance. See continuation sheet JJTI See continuation sheet 8. Statement of Significance Certifying official has considered the significance of this property in relation to other properties: I I nationally I I statewide Pxl locally Applicable National Register Criteria [xlA I IB IxHC I ID Criteria Considerations (Exceptions) I |A I ]B I |c I ID I IE I IF I |G Areas of Significance (enter categories from instructions) Period of Significance Significant Dates TRANSPORTATION__________________ 1Q?6-1940__________ 1926 ARTHTTFrTTTRF.______________________ ______-_______________ __________ Cultural Affiliation N/A Significant Person Architect/Builder __________N/A_________________ State significance of property, and justify criteria, criteria considerations, and areas and periods of significance noted above. See continuation sheet continuation sheet 9. Major Bibliographical References See continuation sheet LxJ See continuation sheet Previous documentation on file (NFS): I I preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) Primary location of additional data: has been requested [Xl State historic preservation office I I previously listed in the National Register I I Other State agency I previously determined eligible by the National Register I I Federal agency I designated a National Historic Landmark I | Local government I recorded by Historic American Buildings I I University Survey # __________________________ EH Other I I recorded by Historic American Engineering Specify repository: Record # __ 10. Geographical Data Acreage of property . less than one acre UTM References A H 17 I k IS i7[ .pi |2 iQl IIP lg.i Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing Cl , I I I . I i i Dl i I I I i I . I i I i i I I See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description The boundary of the nominated property as a heavy dashed line on the accompanying map entitled "Old Seaboard Air Line Railway Station, Deerfield Beach." [~~1 See continuation sheet Boundary Justification The boundary includes only the 1926 station building, and grounds, that have historically been associated with the property. I I See continuation sheet 11. Form Prepared By name/title R. Douglas Wal ton=Hi.stnri r Sites Speriali Eri organization FT. Dept nf State-Kurgan nf Hi date February 16 , 199 street & number SQfl S. "Rrroh .telephone (904) city or town Tallahassee state Florida zip code •*J? 7;QQ-n250 NN Form 10400* United Statea Department of tht Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Shsst Section number ^_Z__ Page__l__ Old Seaboard Air Line Railway Station Summary; The Old Seaboard Air Line Railway Station is a one-story f masonry, Mediterranean Revival structure in a rectangular form designed to provide facilities for both passengers and freight service in one structure. It has a primary roof system of deck- hipped roofs with clay barrel tiled slopes, and a secondary system consisting of a flat, parapeted, asphalt covered roof. Additional features are a two-story tower pavilion, an arcaded loggia, and an intact loading dock. Designed in 1926 by Gustav A. Maass, the structure has remained essentially unchanged, except for minor interior alterations. The building is significant for its part in the economic development of Deerfield Beach, and as a representative of an architectural style indelibly associated with Florida. Setting; The Old Seaboard Air Line Railway Station is located at 1300 West Hillsboro Boulevard in the City of Deerfield Beach, Broward County, Florida. The building is sited on a lot approximately two acres in size. It is about a mile south of the Broward/Palm Beach County line, and immediately southeast of the intersection of Hillsboro Boulevard and the main tracks of the CSX Transportation Corporation, which is about a quarter-mile west of Interstate 95. The site was originally rural in nature, being situated on a two lane road and surrounded by pines, palmettos, sabal palms, and produce sheds. There has been considerable infill since 1926, and the building now has no landscaping, being surrounded by an asphalt parking lot and commercial buildings. EXTERIOR The Old Seaboard Air Line Railway Station is a one-story rectangular building consisting of separate passenger and freight facilities. The foundation of the passenger station is a concrete slab, and the off-grade freight house is supported by concrete piers. The walls are constructed of load bearing tile with a surface of painted stucco. The rafter system is a wood truss and steel I-beam combination, which supports a variety of roof styles. The freight house features a parapeted, flat, built-up asphalt roof over four bays, while the northernmost bay has a deck-hipped roof with clay barreled tile slopes. The NM Pom 104004 ^•^ OM0 Approve/ No. 10844018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number _Z—— Page ——2__ Old Seaboard Air Line Railway Station decked roof of the passenger station has a flat deck of built-up asphalt, and a slope surfaced with terra cotta tile. Windows are mainly double-hung wood sash, and are found only on the north, east, and west elevations. The main (north) elevation is dominated by a loggia and two square pyramid-roofed towers rising above the roofline on the east and west elevations. The loggia, roofed with terra cotta tile, features three arches which open onto a passenger waiting area. The stucco relief inscription "Deerfield Beach Florida" is centered above the center arch. The western and central arches are in line with entrance doorways in the loggia's interior wall. Each doorway is topped by a centered, horizontal transom light. (See Photo 1) The west (trackside) elevation is dominated by a square, one-and-a-half story, pyramid roof tower with overhanging eaves, which rises above the former "white" entrance. (See Exterior Alterations and Restoration Status) The only decoration on the tower is a stucco molding surrounding a circular air vent. To the left (north) of the tower is the side of the loggia, consisting of two arches. Immediately to the right (south) of the tower is the three-windowed bay of the agent's office. The windows of the bay are shielded by decorative iron grillwork. Continuing south, the next feature is the door leading to the baggage room, which is protected by a simple bracketed overhang surfaced with clay tiles. The baggage room roof has overhanging eaves with wood brackets. The next section of building is the series of five freight bays. The bay doorways with their overhead-retracting, corrugated steel bay doors are boarded up. This elevated section is supported on concrete piers and has its original loading dock, which extends the length of the wing. A flat canopy roof overhangs the loading dock, and is supported by steel turnbuckles and cables which anchor into the parapeted wall of the building below the main roofline.
Recommended publications
  • List of Appendices
    Pace/Metra NCS Shuttle Service Feasibility Study March 2005 List of Appendices Appendix A – Employer Database Appendix B – Pace Existing Service Appendix C – Pace Vanpools Appendix D – Employer Private Shuttle Service Appendix E – Letter, Flyer and Survey Appendix F – Survey Results Appendix G – Route Descriptions 50 Pace/Metra NCS Shuttle Service Feasibility Study March 2005 Appendix A Employer Database Business Name Address City Zip Employees A F C Machining Co. 710 Tower Rd. Mundelein 60060 75 A. Daigger & Co. 620 Lakeview Pkwy. Vernon Hills 60061 70 Aargus Plastics, Inc. 540 Allendale Dr. Wheeling 60090 150 Abbott Laboratories 300 Tri State Intl Lincolnshire 60069 300 Abbott-Interfast Corp. 190 Abbott Dr. Wheeling 60090 150 ABF Freight System, Inc 400 E. Touhy Des Plaines 60018 50 ABN AMRO Mortgage Group 1350 E. Touhy Ave., Ste 280-W Des Plaines 60018 150 ABTC 27255 N Fairfield Rd Mundelein 60060 125 Acco USA, Inc 300 Tower Pkwy Lincolnshire 60069 700 Accuquote 1400 S Wolf Rd., Bldg 500 Wheeling 60090 140 Accurate Transmissions, Inc. 401 Terrace Dr. Mundelein 60060 300 Ace Maintenance Service, Inc P.O. Box 66582 Amf Ohare 60666 70 Acme Alliance, LLC 3610 Commercial Ave. Northbrook 60062 250 ACRA Electric Corp. 3801 N. 25th Ave. Schiller Park 60176 50 Addolorata Villa 555 McHenry Rd Wheeling 60090 200+ Advance Mechanical Systems, Inc. 2080 S. Carboy Rd. Mount Prospect 60056 250 Advertiser Network 236 Rte. 173 Antioch 60002 100 Advocate Lutheran General Hospital 1775 Dempster St. Park Ridge 60068 4,100 Advocate, Inc 1661 Feehanville Dr., Ste 200 Mount Prospect 60056 150 AHI International Corporation 6400 Shafer Ct., Ste 200 Rosemont 60018 60 Air Canada P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Intermodal System Urban Fixed Guideway
    Strategic Intermodal System Urban Fixed Guideway To plan for an efficient and safe Urban Fixed Guideway Terminals in Florida transportation network in Florida, Located Serves SIS Integrated Co-located with the state legislature and Florida Facility Name District System Designation at or near air, sea, or with other major Park-&- termini spaceport SIS system Ride Facility Department of Transportation (FDOT) DeLand Station* 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No No No developed the Strategic Intermodal DeBary Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub Yes No No No System (SIS). As part of the SIS, there Sanford Auto Train Track Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No are specific elements Lake Mary Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No that have been identified as critical to Longwood Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No the economic success of Florida. Altamonte Springs Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No Maitland Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No One of these elements are Urban Fixed Winter Park / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No Yes No Guideway (UFG) terminals, which Advent Health Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No No Yes serve as hubs and stations for the urban Lynx Central Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No fixed guideways throughout Florida. Church Street Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No Orlando Health / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No Yes No The adjacent table lists the UFG Sand Lake Road 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No terminals within Florida and whether Meadow Woods Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No they are designated as a SIS Hub or Tupperware Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No SIS Station, based on criteria defined Kissimmee / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No by FDOT.
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTE Use Your Ventra® Card Shuttle Bug 3 Or Exact Fare in Cash
    SHUTTLE BUG FARE ROUTE Use your Ventra® Card Shuttle Bug 3 or exact fare in cash. 633 All Pace service is Driver Has No Change wheelchair accessible. Customers may use a Ventra Card, contactless bankcard, Ventra Effective Date Ticket, Ride Free or Reduced Fare permit, or cash to pay fares on Pace fixed route services. Reduced fares are available for children October 28, 2019 (ages 7-11) and high school, junior high and grammar school students (ages 12-20) presenting a valid Ventra Student Riding Permit or valid school I.D. between 5:30am and 8:30pm on school 626 days. Seniors 65 and older, people with disabilities and individuals 3 to Chicago with a valid Medicare card qualify for reduced fares. A valid RTA Transfer at the Metra MD-North Line Lake Cook Road Station to/from Route 626. Reduced Fare Permit must be presented when using cash to pay a reduced fare. Eligible seniors and people with disabilities may ride Metra Milwaukee District-North Line Lake Cook Road Station fixed route services for free through the RTA Ride Free Program. Please contact the RTA at (312) 913-3110 for more information on free and reduced fares. Free rides are offered to children under 7 (max two children per fare paying adult), law enforcement officers 1 and firefighters in full uniform or presenting a badge, and active duty military personnel in uniform. See the Pace Fare Guide for current Shuttle Bug fares, passes, restrictions and additional information. Visit to Fox Lake ventrachicago.com or call 877-NOW-VENTRA to purchase and load value and passes onto your Ventra Card.
    [Show full text]
  • May 12, 2010 Nancy Muller Florida Housing Finance Corporation 227
    via email: [email protected] PLANNING ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN May 12, 2010 Nancy Muller Florida Housing Finance Corporation 227 North Bronough Street, Suite 5000 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 RE: FORUM’S COMMENTS ON “FLORIDA HOUSING DISCUSSION POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION FOR THE 2011 UNIVERSAL APPLICATION CYCLE” Dear Nancy, I attended the First Rule Development Workshop as well as a CAHP sub-committee meeting on April 29th in Orlando, both of which I found to be very informative and interesting. The meetings certainly gave us a much better feel for the Universal Application process and the difficulties FHFC faces moving forward. FORUM is an established industry leader in multifamily housing design, and we have been actively designing multi-family projects for 24 years throughout the country, although we are primarily focused in Florida. More than half of our 320+ multifamily developments are affordable projects. We work closely with many of Florida’s affordable housing developers, contractors and local housing authorities and we can provide constructive comments to some of the Discussion Points from this position of experience that we hope you will find valuable and insightful. Please find the attached comments gathered from the experienced staff at FORUM presented, per your request, for your consideration in establishing criteria for the revised 2011 Universal Application and beyond. Should you have any questions about our comments, or should you like any additional input, we are happy to assist you in any way that we can. Please feel free to contact me and thank you for the opportunity to be a part of this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 1 Transit Oriented Development and Affordable
    Attachment 1 Transit Oriented Development and Affordable Housing Policies Florida’s Work toward Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Guidelines In Florida, the Department of Transportation and the Department of Community Affairs have worked together to create a framework for TOD, and are working on guidelines for local governments that want to create transit-oriented communities. There are no specific state standards for an area to be considered as TOD; it is defined at the local level. At this point, DCA and DOT have developed a guide of best practices for TOD, based on the type of setting (urban, suburban, and rural). Their findings include the following national best practices for TOD: • ¼ to ½ mile radius around a transit station, the distance most pedestrians are willing to walk; • Optimize transit, walking and biking; reducing “vehicle miles traveled”; • High density, 24-hour live, work and recreate centers (connecting housing and jobs); and • Reduced parking requirements. Most state level planning recognizes the importance of affordable housing in TOD. The Florida draft guidelines acknowledge that TOD is conducive to affordable or workforce housing options, but that “land values increase around station areas, therefore if left to market conditions alone, maintaining the affordability of housing near TODs can be problematic over time1.” At the federal level, HUD and the Federal Transit Administration are collaborating to address this issue. The Government Accountability Office report on TOD and affordable housing notes that state housing finance agencies have an important role in encouraging the development of affordable housing near transit, including TODs. The final section of this paper includes information on specific TODs in Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Deerfield Train Station
    TH E HISTORIC DEERFIELD TRAIN STATION Deerfield, IL www.deerfieldlibrary.org 2018 text: Dylan Zavagno The first train station in Deerfield was built in 1871 by the Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul & Pacific Railroad, known as the Milwaukee Road, which, as the name suggests, connected Chicago to the West on its main line. The first station was a simple boxcar located near Central Ave. Before train travel came to Deerfield, you’d have to take a horse and buggy to Chicago—or walk to the Highland Park train station. today appears it as station The Deerfield had long been a resting place for travelers between Chicago and Milwaukee. John Kinzie “Indian” Clark, would stop in the area on his Chicago-Milwaukee mail route, which followed Waukegan Rd., an old Native American trail. An early Deerfield settler, Lyman Wilmot, was an abolitionist whose home was a stop on the Underground Railroad. Wilmot’s son reflected on the hangec to the town the railroad brought, writing in a diary entry on New Year’s Eve, 1874: “Now as I write the shades of the last evening...are gathering fast, the sky is cloudy & as I look out of the east windows of the dining room & About the author see the smoke from the engine of a long freight train rising as a cloud as Dylan Zavagno is the Adult Services Coordinator at the Deerfield ublicP Library where he hosts the Deerfield the train rushes on up the grain, we are now in a living moving world & Public Library Podcast, featuring interviews authors, artists, and other notable people.
    [Show full text]
  • Roa D's Hard for Tri-Rail a S It Toils on I Ts F Ast Tra Ck
    |HBRB_031126K#~ |HBRB_031126C*~ |HBRB_031126M;~ |HBRB_031126Yd~ Bro 3B Bro 3B Bro 3B Bro 3B |HBRB_031126K#~ BLACK |HBRB_031126C*~ CYAN |HBRB_031126M;~ MAGENTA |HBRB_031126Yd~ YELLOW !OKBUG! WWW.HERALD.COM BRO FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2004 I 3B BROWARD PLUS SPIRIT OF THANKSGIVING PUBLIC TRANSIT Roa d’s hard for Tri-Rail as it toils on its fast tra ck I Tri-Rail hopes to improve rush-hour service so trains A SECOND TRACK will run once every 20 LEGEND minutes by 2006. Mean- Second track complete while, construction delays Planned/under construction a re a continual nuisance. Mangonia Park station BY MICHAEL HIBBLEN West Palm Beach station [email protected] Palm Beach Airport Station Tri-Rail is hoping its SOUTHERN BLVD. $334 million double-tracking project will lead to improved service and increased rider- Lake Worth station ship. But until construction is complete, the project will sometimes mean some aggra- N Boynton Beach vating delays both for Tri-Rail 5 miles station Turnpike J. ALBERT DIAZ/HERALD STAFF riders and for drivers who need to cross the railroad. ATLANTIC AVE. HOLIDAY FARE: Volunteer Shanna Gugliotta, carrying a tray of pie slices, surveys the dining room at the Salvation The commuter rail agency Delray Beach station Army’s Thanksgiving meal in Fort Lauderdale. reopened the Hollywood Bou- Boca Raton station levard crossing this week after PALM BEACH COUNTY two weeks of work at the site. 441 95 The crossings at Johnson Street and Stirling Road will Deerfield Beach station be closed next year, as will the BODY AND SOUL Pompano Beach station one at 79th Street in Miami.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FY 2013-2022 Annual Update SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
    SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FY 2013-2022 Annual Update Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 1.0 SFRTA Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2 1.1 Tri‐Rail System………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 1.2 SFRTA Shuttle Bus…………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 1.3 Challenges Faced by the Agency……………………………………………………………………………….3 2.0 FY 2012 Accomplishments……………………………………………………………………………………………………5 2.1 Shuttle Bus……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 2.2 Fast Start Plan for Tri‐Rail Coastal Service……………………………………………………………….10 2.3 Grants…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 2.4 Station Improvements……………………………………………………………………………………………14 2.5 Tri‐Rail Service……………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 2.6 Regional Coordination………………………………………………………………………………….………..20 2.7Industry Involvement…………………………………………………………………………………….………..21 2.8 Customer Outreach………………………………………………………………………………………….…….21 2.9 Awards………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….…….21 2.10 Monitoring Program to Track Annual Performance……………………………………….……..22 3.0 SFRTA Capital Program……………………………………………………………………………………………….………24 4.0 Fiscal Plan……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……28 4.1 Capital Budget…………………………………………………………………………………………..……………28 4.2 Operating Budget……………………………………………………………………………………………………31 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………33 A. Shuttle Bus Maps B. Marlins Shuttle Information C. SFRTA Goals and Objectives D. SFRTA Adopted
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Florida Regional Transportation Plan FINAL.Indd
    Final Documentation PALM BEACH MPO • BROWARD MPO • MIAMI-DADE MPO Contents Introduction . 6 Development of the Plan . 8 Plan Components Our Region and Trends . 12 Governance Data and Analysis . 14 Development and Review of 2035 Model Inputs Data and Analysis . 16 Travel Patterns and Commuting 2005 Transit Characteristics 2005 Automobile Characteristics 2005–2035 Air/Sea Characteristics Regional Transportation Network . 18 Plan Context . 22 Federal Context State Context Regional Context Local Context 2 Regional Goals . 26 Finances . 30 Financial Snapshot: Funded Projects . 36 Project Highlights Statistics Unfunded Projects . 58 Project Highlights Statistics Freight System . 66 Goals, Objectives, and Policies Identifi cation and Prioritization of Freight Projects Transit . 76 Public Involvement . 78 Public Involvement Conclusion . 80 3 Participants Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization 2300 N. Jog Road, 4th Floor West Palm Beach, Florida 33411-2749 Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization 100 West Cypress Creek Road, Suite 850 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization 111 N.W. First Street , Suite 910 Miami, Florida 33128-1999 4 Funding Partners Legal Information and Project Team and Contact Information The three Southeast Florida MPO’s provided funding for this The preparation of this report has been fi nanced in part fi rst Regional Long Range Transportation Plan: the Palm through grants from the Federal Highway Administration and Beach MPO, the Broward MPO, and the Miami-Dade MPO. Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transporta- tion, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section Other regional partners who particpated in the development 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title of this plan include: 23, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Skokie Swift North Shore Corridor Travel Market Analysis
    Skokie Swift North Shore Corridor Travel Market Analysis final report prepared for City of Evanston in association with Village of Skokie Regional Transportation Authority prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. in association with Valerie S. Kretchmer & Associates, Inc. Bernadette Schleis & Associates, Inc. July 2007 www.camsys.com final report Skokie Swift North Shore Corridor Travel Market Analysis prepared for City of Evanston in association with Village of Skokie Regional Transportation Authority prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 115 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2200 Chicago, Illinois 60603 in association with Valerie S. Kretchmer & Associates, Inc. Bernadette Schleis & Associates, Inc. July 2007 Skokie Swift North Shore Corridor Travel Market Analysis Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 Study Approach ............................................................................................................ ES-1 Population, Employment, Land Use, and Demographics....................................... ES-2 Existing Transportation Network............................................................................... ES-4 Travel Patterns............................................................................................................... ES-6 Market Evaluation ........................................................................................................ ES-8 Station Alternatives .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2040 Southeast Florida Regional Transportation
    OCT 2015 LETTER FROM THE CHAIRWOMAN The Southeast Florida Region is the 4th most populous urbanized area in the United States. Our wide demographic diversity and immense geographic area provide a host of challenges and opportunities to promote a world class, integrated regional transportation system. Through our coordinated long range planning efforts, we have made great strides in identifying transportation facilities and services that will strengthen our region and the competitiveness of our nation as a whole at the global scale. This document builds on our previous efforts by laying out a 25-year plan for strategic regional transportation investments that will improve quality of life, maximize mobility options and promote a fiscally sustainable future. Through our outreach efforts, we know that a key to moving people is having a broad range of options suited to our resident’s range of mobility needs and economic circumstances. This plan will increase mobility options, including public transit, to provide our residents a wider variety of transportation options to meet their everyday needs. Projects like expanded commuter rail and express bus services make it easier for residents to cross jurisdictional boundaries without having to use their car. Extensive and expansive investments in bicycle and pedestrian facilities offer safe, green, and fit ways to travel for people of all ages and abilities. The substantial investments that we make in our freight terminals and logistics, rail, and highway networks will ensure optimum efficiency while mitigating potentially adverse impacts. Investments in a regional managed lane network further advance efficient movement of vehicles while reducing traffic congestion in a fiscally responsible manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Alternatives Analysis Report
    South Florida East Coast Corridor FINAL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS REPORT October 2011 Federal Aid No. FTAX004 FTA Grant No. FL-90-X372-07 FM No. 417031-1-22-01 Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties, Florida Contract: C-8F66 2 SFECCTA Alternatives Analysis Report SOUTH FLORIDA EAST COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT ANALYSIS Lead Agencies: Florida Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration Title of the Proposed Action: South Florida East Coast Corridor Transit Analysis ABSTRACT: This report documents the development and analysis of alternatives for implementing reliable, high quality transit in the 85-mile Florida East Coast corridor located in southeast Florida. The purpose of the project is to increase transit options for travel in southeast Florida, support the Eastward Ho! Initiative of the counties in the region, encourage redevelopment and economic growth in the coastal cities, and supplement the existing highway network. These goals were developed in cooperation with the counties, cities, metropolitan planning organizations, regional planning organizations, civic and business organizations, and the general public. The study has proceeded in two phases. The first phase led to the development of modally generic alternatives that were refined into four, specific modal alternatives in Phase 2, which is the subject of this report. These four alternatives: TSM, BRT, Integrated Rail “DMU”, and Integrated Rail “Push- Pull,” were defined and compared against both a No Build alternative and against each other. Each of these alternatives incorporates new transit service along the Florida East Coast Railway (FEC) cor- ridor with existing transit service operated by each of the three counties in the region (Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade) and Tri-Rail.
    [Show full text]