South Florida RTA's Transit Development Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South Florida RTA's Transit Development Plan Prepared for: South Florida Regional Transportation Authority 800 NW 33rd Street, Suite 100 Pompano Beach, FL 33064 (954) 942‐7245 Prepared by: Tindale‐Oliver & Associates, Inc. 6750 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 (954) 489‐2748 In cooperation with August 2013 (This page is intenƟonally leŌ blank) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section ES.1: INTRODUCTION ……… ............................................................................... ES‐1 ES.1.1 TDP Checklist ….. ................................................................................................................... ES‐2 Section ES.2: OVERVIEW OF SFRTA .............................................................................. ES‐3 ES.2.1 SFRTA Existing Services ......................................................................................................... ES‐3 ES.2.2 Accomplishments Since Last TDP Major Update ................................................................. ES‐6 Section ES.3: SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ..................................................... ES‐9 ES.3.1 Tri‐Rail On‐Board Survey ...................................................................................................... ES‐9 ES.3.2 Intercept Survey .................................................................................................................... ES‐9 ES.3.3 Online Efforts …………… ......................................................................................................... ES‐10 ES.3.4 Meetings and Presentations ……….. ...................................................................................... ES‐11 Section ES.4: SFRTA GOALS & OBJECTIVES ................................................................... ES‐13 Section ES.5: SFRTA NEEDS PLAN ................................................................................. ES‐15 ES.5.1 Premium Transit .................................................................................................................... ES‐15 ES.5.2 Shuttle Bus and Other Station Access .................................................................................. ES‐15 ES.5.3 System and Station Infrastructure ....................................................................................... ES‐16 ES.5.4 Station Area Development ................................................................................................... ES‐16 ES.5.5 Technology ............................................................................................................................ ES‐17 ES.5.6 Service and Capital Planning ................................................................................................. ES‐17 Section ES.6: SFRTA FORWARD PLAN ........................................................................... ES‐19 ES.6.1 Operating Plan Forecast ........................................................................................................ ES‐19 ES.6.2 Capital Plan Forecast ............................................................................................................. ES‐25 ES.6.3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. ES‐30 SFRTA FORWARD PLAN Section 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1‐1 Section 2: BASELINE CONDITIONS ................................................................................. 2‐1 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2‐1 2.2 Service Area Description ......................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.3 Population Profile .................................................................................................................... 2‐3 2.4 Potential Transportation Disadvantaged Population .............................................................. 2‐11 2.5 Demographic and Journey‐To‐Work Characteristics .............................................................. 2‐11 2.6 Roadway Conditions ................................................................................................................ 2‐20 2.7 Major Employers and Trip Generators .................................................................................... 2‐20 2.8 Tourism .................................................................................................................................... 2‐32 2.9 Land Use Characteristics ......................................................................................................... 2‐34 Section 3: EVALUATION OF EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES .............................................. 3‐1 3.1 SFRTA Overview and Existing Services ..................................................................................... 3‐1 3.1.1 History of SFRTA ............................................................................................................ 3‐1 3.1.2 SFRTA Existing Transportation Services ......................................................................... 3‐1 3.1.3 SFRTA Efforts and Accomplishments Since Last TDP .................................................... 3‐13 3.1.4 Existing Transportation Services – Other Providers ....................................................... 3‐28 3.2 Trend Analysis ………………… ...................................................................................................... 3‐41 3.2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3‐41 3.2.2 Commuter Rail Trend Analysis ....................................................................................... 3‐41 3.2.3 Shuttle Bus Service Trend Analysis ................................................................................. 3‐48 3.3 Peer Review Analysis ................................................................................................................ 3‐53 3.3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3‐53 3.3.2 Peer Review Methodology ............................................................................................. 3‐53 3.3.3 Peer Review Analysis ...................................................................................................... 3‐62 3.3.4 Summary of Peer Analysis .............................................................................................. 3‐64 3.4 Tri‐Rail Performance Measures Update ................................................................................... 3‐67 3.4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3‐67 3.4.2 Tri‐Rail Performance Measurement Report Update ...................................................... 3‐67 3.4.3 Summary of Findings ...................................................................................................... 3‐69 Section 4: PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY ............................................................... 4‐1 4.1 Public Involvement Summary .................................................................................................. 4‐1 4.1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.1.2 Summary of Public Involvement Activities .................................................................... 4‐1 4.2 Public Involvement Assessment .............................................................................................. 4‐11 4.2.1 Assessment of Public Involvement Evaluation Measures ............................................. 4‐11 4.2.2 Compilation of Citizen and Stakeholder Agency Input .................................................. 4‐13 Section 5: SITUATION APPRAISAL ................................................................................. 5‐1 5.1 Plans Review............................................................................................................................. 5‐1 5.1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5‐1 5.1.2 Plans Review Summary Table and Documentation........................................................ 5‐1 5.2 Situation Appraisal .................................................................................................................. 5‐11 5.2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5‐11 5.2.2 Regional Transportation Issues ...................................................................................... 5‐11 5.2.3 Plans and Policies .......................................................................................................... 5‐13 5.2.4 Organization Issues ........................................................................................................ 5‐15 5.2.5 Funding Sources ............................................................................................................. 5‐16 5.2.6 Socioeconomic Trends ................................................................................................... 5‐17 5.2.7 Travel Behavior .............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Commuter Rail System Study
    TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Commuter Rail System Study Transit Committee March 11, 2010 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Study Purpose Study Requested by MAG Regional Council in 2008 Commuter Rail Study Funding in 2004 RTP Study Feasibility of Commuter Rail Service in MAG Region Ridership Forecasting and Cost Effectiveness Capital and Operating Cost Estimates Vehicle Technology Recommendation Implementation Requirements Copyright © 2009 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Peer Regions ~ Commuter Rail Systems WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? Peak Period, Peak Direction Service. Traditionally caries less daily riders than light rail, but for longer distances. Similar market and characteristics with Bus Rapid Transit / Express. SOUNDER-Seattle CALTRAIN-San Francisco ALTAMONT COMMUTER EXPRESS – San Jose Can share ROW and track with freight railroads and can operate concurrently (does not require exclusive right-of-way) . Typically longer station spacing (every 3-7 miles on average) than light rail (1-2 miles) with emphasis on park-and-rides and traditional city CBDs. Locomotive technology (diesel or clean/green hybrid Genset). Passenger coaches (push-pull). Engines and cars meets federally mandated structural requirements for rolling stock crash resistance Larger, heavier profile than light rail vehicles. METROLINK – Los Angeles COASTER – San Diego FRONT RUNNER – Salt Lake City-Ogden Higher max.speed (79mph), slower acceleration and deceleration than light rail. Average speed approx 44mph. Lower capital cost per mile ($10-$20M) due to existing right of way use / reuse. Light
    [Show full text]
  • Suniland Shopping Center 11293-11535 SOUTH DIXIE HWY, PINECREST, FL 33156
    FOR LEASE > RETAIL SPACE Suniland Shopping Center 11293-11535 SOUTH DIXIE HWY, PINECREST, FL 33156 Property Features • High-traffic retail center located along Miami-Dade’s busiest and strongest retail corridor, US1 • Nestled between two upscale regional malls, Dadeland Mall & The Falls • Diverse range of shops and restaurants with strong sales • Trade area includes Pinecrest, Coral Gables & Kendall, where residents have an average HH income of $122k and average home values of $1.1M • + 83,500 vpd on US1 • + 11,200 vpd on SW 112th Street • GLA: 82,268 SF CONTACT: ARIEL BERNSTEIN CONTACT: STEVEN HENENFELD COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 305 779 3152 305 779 3178 2121 Ponce de Leon Boulevard CORAL GABLES, FL CORAL GABLES, FL Suite 1250 [email protected] [email protected] Coral Gables, FL 33134 www.colliers.com SUNILAND SHOPPING CENTER > AREA RETAILERS SUNILAND SHOPPING CENTER > SITE PLAN SECOND FLOOR 11535A S T 11509 L I S E AUTO TAG A DENTIST , N W 1 11507 S 11349 11293A N BARBER SHOP ERN O D 11505 G O A BLOW SUSHIROCK M W DRY “BREEZEWAY” 11515 11521 “BREEZEWAY” FL COMMUNITY BANK 11327 11423-11427 11315 11325 11417 11421 11431 11429 11341 11399 11311 11331 11401 11403 200 11501 BOOKS & POP UP 11503 11355 11293 11297 11299 11301 U.S. HWY 1 / SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY - 94,100 VPD 100 11293A Auto Tag 1,651 SF 250 11403 Chicken Kitchen 1,330 SF 110 11293 Sushi Rock Cafe 2,426 SF 260 11415 Flanigans 8,250 SF 120 11297 Books & Books 2,320 SF 270 11417 European Wax Center 1,250 SF 130 11299 CVS Pharmacy 9,370 SF 280 11421 Piola 2,517
    [Show full text]
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Access Plan Executive Summary & General Recommendations 2019
    Transit Access Plan Executive Summary & General Recommendations 2019 1 Transit Access Plan Executive Summary Executive Summary The purpose of the Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency (TPA)’s Transit Access Plan is to identify roadway modifications that improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and access to high ridership Palm Tran locations in Palm Beach County. In order to create a safe, efficient and connected transportation system, we must provide safe access to transit for users of all ages and abilities. Improving first and last mile connections to transit enables people of all ages and abilities to safely access destinations such as employment, education, medical facilities, and healthy foods. Creating a more walk and bicycle friendly environment can also encourage more walking, bicycling, and transit use as well as improve overall community health. The TPA initially identified 20 high ridership Palm Tran bus stops and narrowed them down to the following six (6) locations throughout the county with the most opportunity for safety improvements: 1. West Palm Beach: Palm Beach Lakes Blvd at N Congress Ave 2. Boynton Beach: Congress Ave at Old Boynton Rd 3. Belle Glade: SR-80 at Hooker Hwy 4. Boca Raton: Butts Rd at Town Center Rd 5. Riviera Beach: Military Trail at W Blue Heron Blvd 6. Delray Beach: Atlantic Ave at Military Trail An approximate radius of 1/2 mile for each identified high ridership location was used to conduct walking field audits with the participation of planners and engineers from the TPA, its consultant (CTS Engineering, Inc.), Palm Tran, roadway owner(s) and local municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • Riding Public Wheels, Rails KRISTINA's ROUTE
    PUBLIC TRANSIT DAY Riding public wheels, rails Trip from Wellington to Delray went smoothly on Palm Tran, Tri‐ Rail. By Kristina Webb Palm Beach Post Staff Writer A northbound Tri‐Rail train pulls away from the Intermodal Transit Center in West Palm Beach on Friday, which was Public Transit Day, newly observed in South Florida this year. KRISTINA WEBB / THE PALM BEACH POST KRISTINA’S ROUTE Here’s the route Post transportation reporter Kristina Webb took Friday during Public Transit Day: Webb 7:20 a.m.: Boarded the 7:20 a.m. eastbound Route 2 Palm Tran bus at the Mall at Wellington Green 7:50 a.m.: Arrived at the Intermodal Transit Center in West Palm Beach 8 a.m.: Boarded a southbound Tri‐Rail train 8:30 a.m.: Got off the train at the Delray Beach station on Congress Avenue 8:45 a.m.: Hopped on a Delray Beach trolley About 9 a.m.: Left the trolley on Atlantic Avenue in downtown Delray and grabbed breakfast at Subculture Coffee 9:30 a.m.: Boarded the trolley back to the Delray Tri‐Rail station 9:50 a.m.: Boarded a northbound Tri‐Rail train 10:05 a.m.: Arrived at the Lake Worth Tri‐Rail station and boarded the westbound Route 62 Palm Tran bus 10:50 a.m.: Arrived back at the Mall at Wellington Green COST Roundtrip Tri‐Rail fare between West Palm Beach and Delray Beach: $8.25 Palm Tran daypass: $5 As I stood next to Palm Tran Executive Director Clinton Forbes near the Mall at Wellington Green on Friday morning, I realized I needed to make a confession.
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison Report
    Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison Report Public Review Draft October 2017 Caltrain Fare Study Draft Research and Peer Comparison October 2017 Research and Peer Review Research and Peer Review .................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 A Note on TCRP Sources ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Elasticity of Demand for Commuter Rail ............................................................................... 3 Definition ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Commuter Rail Elasticity ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Comparison with Peer Systems ............................................................................................ 4 Fares ................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Employer Programs ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Department of Transportation
    Florida Department of Transportation RON DESANTIS 3400 West Commercial Boulevard KEVIN J. THIBAULT, P.E. GOVERNOR SECRETARY Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 For Immediate Release Contact: Guillermo Canedo April 30, 2021 (954) 777-4090 | [email protected] FDOT Palm Beach County Traffic Report April 30 through May 7, 2021 PALM BEACH COUNTY, Fla. – Palm Beach County traffic will be affected this week by ongoing construction projects and maintenance work, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) officials report. Closures will be in effect on I-95 and in other areas throughout Palm Beach County for construction activities. For around-the-clock, real-time, I-95 traffic information, call 511. To view real-time video of I-95 in Palm Beach County, visit the Florida Department of Transportation’s Palm Beach SMART SunGuide Transportation Management Center (TMC) website at www.smartsunguide.com. FDOT and the SunGuide™ Partners provide these free services. For updated lane closure information, please refer to www.d4fdot.com. Follow us on Twitter and Instagram @MyFDOT_SEFL, and Facebook @MyFDOTSEFL. CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INTERSTATE 95 1. I-95 from south of SW 10th Street in the City of Deerfield Beach to south of Glades Road in the City of Boca Raton (95 Express Phase 3B-1) Description: Work on this 4.8-mile 95 Express project includes widening and converting the existing I- 95 HOV Lanes to Managed Lanes which will result in two tolled Express Lanes in each direction; the number of General Use lanes will remain the same. Other project improvements include bridge widenings at Palmetto Park Road and Camino Real, complete bridge replacement at the Hillsboro Canal, noise wall construction, portable traffic monitoring sites, toll gantry installation, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) installation, ramp signaling at the I-95 entrance ramps from Palmetto Park Road, Express Lane markers and landscape relocation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nordstrom to Open at Turnberry's Aventura Mall in South Florida
    Nordstrom to Open at Turnberry's Aventura Mall in South Florida July 7, 2005 SEATTLE, July 7, 2005 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- Seattle-based Nordstrom, Inc. (NYSE: JWN), a leading fashion specialty retailer announced it has signed a letter of intent with Turnberry Associates and the Simon Property Group, Inc. to open a new Nordstrom store at Aventura Mall in South Florida. Nordstrom will build a new, two-level store that will be approximately 167,000 square feet. The store will be attached to existing space that will be renovated to include eight to 10 additional retailers. A parking deck will also be created adjacent to the new Nordstrom. Nordstrom at Aventura Mall is scheduled to open in Fall 2007 and will be the retailer's third location in the Greater Miami/Fort Lauderdale area, and the eighth in Florida. The company will be opening a store at the Gardens Mall in Palm Beach Gardens on March 10, 2006. (Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20001011/NORDLOGO ) "We're always interested in being where our customers want us to be," said Erik Nordstrom, executive vice president of full-line stores for Nordstrom. "We opened at The Village of Merrick Park in Coral Gables in 2002 and then at Dadeland Mall just last fall, and have received a positive response from the community. Aventura Mall offers the perfect spot to expand our presence in South Florida serving local residents and out-of-town visitors who love to shop." Aventura Mall is centrally located in the heart of South Florida with more than 250 retail and specialty shops, a 24-screen movie theater and a variety of restaurants.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives Final Bill Analysis Summary
    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FINAL BILL ANALYSIS BILL #: CS/CS/CS/HB 695 FINAL HOUSE FLOOR ACTION: SUBJECT/SHORT South Florida Regional 111 Y’s 6 N’s TITLE Transportation Authority SPONSOR(S): Government Accountability Committee; Transportation & Tourism Appropriations GOVERNOR’S Subcommittee; Transportation & Approved ACTION: Infrastructure Subcommittee; Santiago COMPANION CS/CS/SB 842 BILLS: SUMMARY ANALYSIS CS/CS/CS/HB 695 passed the House on April 28, 2017, and subsequently passed the Senate on May 1, 2017. The bill addresses insurance liability issues related to the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA), which operates commuter rail service in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade Counties. The bill provides SFRTA with the ability to indemnify the Florida East Coast Railway (FECR) and All Aboard Florida (AAF) under certain circumstances. The bill provides who is responsible for property damage and injury to certain persons associated with several scenarios involving rail accidents. The bill also provides an allocation of risk between the parties and includes provisions for passengers and other rail corridor invitees. The bill authorizes SFRTA to purchase railroad liability insurance of $295 million per occurrence, and allows it to adjust the limit in accordance with applicable law. The bill also requires SFRTA to maintain a $5 million self- insurance retention account. The bill authorizes the Department of Transportation (DOT) to indemnify and insure certain rail services on DOT-owned rail corridors. The bill prohibits SFRTA from entering into a contract or other agreement, or renewing or extending any existing contract or other agreement, which may be funded, in whole or in part, with DOT provided funds without DOT’s prior review and written approval of SFRTA’s proposed expenditures.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Rail 2013 On-Board Survey
    TRI-RAIL 2013 ON-BOARD SURVEY Prepared for: July 2013 South Florida Regional Transportation Authority 800 NW 33rd Street Pompano Beach, FL 33064 Prepared by: HNTB Corporation 8700 West Flagler Street, Suite 402 Miami, FL 33174 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Scope of the Effort ........................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Previous Tri-Rail Surveys .................................................................................................. 3 2.0 SURVEY DESIGN ............................................................................................. 4 2.1 Sampling Plan ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Survey Instrument ............................................................................................................ 7 2.2.1 Overview / Comparison to Previous Survey Results ................................................................................ 7 2.2.2 Pretest ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.0 MINIMIZATION/MITIGATION OF NON-RESPONSE BIAS ................................. 9 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................... 10 4.1 Training ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Master Plan
    DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown chapter Transit Oriented Development Guidelines4 Adopted: February 4, 2014 TOD GUIDELINES ADOPTED FEBRUARY 4, 2014 PREFACE In 2003, the City partnered with the Downtown Development Downtown Fort Lauderdale continues to grow and mature as the Authority (DDA) and other major stakeholders to create this County’s regional city. As a great tropical city, the quality of life of Downtown Master Plan, a blueprint for the future development of its neighbors and visitors cannot be compromised. New Downtown Fort Lauderdale. The Master Plan was amended in development must knit together the urban fabric into a seamless 2007 to better address and focus on active streetscapes and pattern of beautiful streets, public spaces and buildings of the building design. After a period of stagnant growth caused by the highest quality, all within easy access to various modes of 2009 global recession, Downtown Fort Lauderdale has transportation. Mobility options are essential to keep people moving experienced an influx in new residential development applications throughout the City and for the continued economic health and and built projects. vibrancy of the Downtown. Investments in multimodal transportation options and creating a safe and walkable city For the first time in almost a century, many American cities are were identified as top ranked priorities of Fast Forward Fort growing at a faster rate than their surrounding suburbs. Across the Lauderdale: the City’s 2035 Vision Plan. country, cities are competing with one another to attract young professionals to live, work and play in their downtowns. Seniors There are several transformative projects that will help support the and families are also benefitting from living in cities that contain growth of Downtown Fort Lauderdale while ensuring safe and high quality amenities and basic services linked together by efficient mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • Aware Pilot Project Along South Florida Rail Corridor
    AWARE PILOT PROJECT ALONG SOUTH FLORIDA RAIL CORRIDOR FINAL PROJECT REPORT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT # BC498 AMENDMENT #2 Prepared by: Nestor Traffic Systems, Inc. Report Date: June 4, 2002 400 Massasoit Ave. Suite 200 East Providence, RI 02914 Telephone: 401-434-5522 Fax: 401-434-5809 Internet: www.nestor.com Copyright © 2002, Nestor Traffic Systems, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................. 1-5 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................................. 2-1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (AS PROPOSED)...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]