Zion Woods Project Description

Zion Woods is a 48-unit new construction affordable development for families in Deerfield, IL. The site is located on 7 acres of vacant land owned by and adjacent to Zion Lutheran Evangelical Church at 10 Deerfield Road. As part of their mission, the Church is willing to contribute this land to the project through a long-term lease for a nominal rate. The project will be marketed as workforce housing and will be targeted to people who work in the area, but cannot afford to live in Deerfield. The project is being developed by Brinshore Development, LLC in conjunction with Housing Opportunity Development Corporation (HODC), an nonprofit. Brinshore Development, LLC has been successfully developing affordable housing for the past 20 years. Please see attached list of developments and experience information for Brinshore and HODC attached. Please also see Brinshore’s website at www.brinshore.com for descriptions and pictures of all of the developments in its portfolio.

Location The project site is located in a highly desirable area, less than a mile from downtown Deerfield and approximately 2 miles from downtown Highland Park. The site has never been developed and currently consists of an open field with significant tree growth on the north, east and west borders. There is also a large community garden that serves the congregation and local residents. Amenities that are closest to the site include Deerspring Park, which has a pool and splash park run by the Park District, as well as the downtown Deerfield shopping district which includes a Whole Foods and numerous retail clothing stores, restaurants, and shops. The closest supermarket is within one mile of the site to the east on Deerfield Road. The nearest public school is less than half a mile away and the Village Hall, police department, post office, and other government services are located on Waukegan Road less than a mile west of the site.

Physical Description The project will consist of three 2-story, 16-unit buildings that are clustered around a central core of landscaped parkway and parking. The remainder of the site will function as a conservation area open to public use. . The unit mix will consist of 12 one-bedroom units, 24 two-bedroom units, and 12 three- bedroom units. The size of the units will ranges from 680 sf for a one-bedroom apartment to 1125 sf for a 3 bedroom apartment. . Unit amenities will include vinyl plank wood flooring throughout the units, in-unit washer/dryer, hard wired internet, and energy efficient appliances. . All unit interiors will have a focus on energy-efficiency, water conservation, and a healthy interior living environment. Materials will be of recycled content where possible and finishes will be low or no-VOC, and be durable and easily maintainable. . The project will be designed to achieve the Enterprise Green Communities certification. The Green Communities certification includes sustainable features such as: Energy Star certification, Energy Star appliances, low-flow water fixtures, high efficiency lighting, native landscaping, environmentally preferable flooring, and operating a smoke-free building. . Project amenities will include a resident community room, management office, tot lot, secure bicycle parking, community garden plots for all residents, and picnic areas with grills. . Ten percent of the units will be made accessible for tenants with physical disabilities. . The stormwater management areas will be naturally landscaped with appropriate vegetation to create natural wildlife habitats. The remainder of the site will be thoughtfully landscaped with drought-tolerant, native landscaping and grasses. Careful attention will be paid to screening the development from the surrounding neighbors so as to provide privacy for all residents of the community. . The stormwater management areas will be open to the public and an overlook will be created off of Deerfield Road with walking and bicycle paths for community access.

Access The site is directly off Deerfield Road, a major arterial street in the North Shore with PACE bus #471 connecting residents to Highland Park and the UP-North line, Deerfield and the Metra MD-North line, as well as , a very large upscale with over 300 stores. The Deerfield corridor is dominated by commercial retail, including small businesses, educational facilities and financial institutions. Additionally, the site is less than a mile from Skokie Highway which provides access to the Eden’s Expressway and downtown .

Deerfield Road is four-lane east-west arterial with a striped median and a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Left turn lanes are provided on Deerfield Road on both the eastbound and westbound approaches to Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue and the eastbound approach to Zion Driveway. According to the Traffic Impact Study prepared by V3 Companies which estimated traffic patterns for the Year 2020, the existing roadway system will handle the additional traffic generated by this development. Both the signalized intersection of Deerfield Road and Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue and the unsignalized intersection of Deerfield Road and the Zion Driveway will operate at an acceptable level of service with the addition of development trips. Likewise, all projected queue lengths will be accommodated by the existing storage lengths.

Target Market Zion Woods will provide an attractive and affordable residential option for current housing cost- burdened residents of Deerfield and the workforce currently in Deerfield. As mentioned below, nearly half of current renters and over 35% of current owners in Deerfield pay more than they can afford for housing (based on federal guidelines). Zion Woods will allow those residents with ties to the community to remain in Deerfield in spite of changes to their financial situation, which may result as a change of career, marital status, or medical issues. This housing will also be attractive to recent college graduates in the early stages of their careers who may have grown up in Deerfield and would like to stay close to family as they finish post-college degrees or take internships to explore various career environments.

Zion Woods will provide high quality housing near employment centers that is appropriately priced to meet the needs of local workers. Workforce housing is often targeted at “essential workers” in a community (e.g. service providers, retail workers, teacher assistants, and health care workers), as will be the case at Zion Woods. Strong local employers are vital to a community’s quality of life. The future economic health of a community or region relies greatly on its ability to provide a stable and competitive workforce for nearby businesses and industries. Local employers contribute to the tax base and provide needed services and products. These enterprises are more stable and economically vibrant when their employees live close to work, especially in high quality, well-located and appropriately- priced residences.

Ensuring that tenants pay no more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs allows residents to maintain disposable income to be spent on local goods and services, providing workers an opportunity to pursue other important endeavors such as higher education, training that leads to higher-paying careers, and homeownership. Workforce housing also reduces lengthy commutes for workers, resulting in decreased stress and fatigue due to traffic and transportation costs, which leads to increased worker productivity and reduced absenteeism and turnover, a direct bottom line benefit to the company.

Zion Woods will provide a direct benefit to the Deerfield community based on the following information that has been provided by our market analyst:

Affordable Rental for Deerfield Residents . Nearly half of current renters and over 35% of current owners in Deerfield pay more than they can afford for housing (based on federal guidelines). . The majority of the rents at Zion Woods will range from $760/month for a one-bedroom unit to $1,050/month for a three-bedroom unit. The majority of incomes will range from $31,920 for a one-person household to $52,920 for a six-person household. The maximum family size in each unit is two occupants per bedroom. Additionally, a tenant’s income can increase by 140 percent and they will still qualify to live in Zion Woods. . The median rent in Deerfield is currently $1,683, requiring an income of $67,320 to be affordable. The weighted average rent at Zion Woods will be $888, requiring an income of approximately $35,520. . The median home price in Deerfield is $494,000 and the median monthly costs of owning a home are $3,250, requiring a minimum income of $130,000 per year for homeowners in Deerfield. . Average vacancy rates at area rental properties are at 2.5%, indicating demand for additional offerings.

Affordable Rental for Deerfield Workforce . Approximately 27.99% of households in the Primary Market Area (12,241 households) earn the appropriate income to live in Zion Woods. . Approximately 43% of the jobs in Deerfield, or 10,743 jobs, pay less than $40,000 per year. . Approximately 33% of the jobs in Deerfield are in the retail trade, in industries such as restaurants, retail, and child care services at companies such as Jewel-Osco, Walgreens, and Home Depot. Additionally, the average teaching assistant in the Deerfield School District earns between $20,000 to $25,000 annually and would qualify for this development. . The vast majority of workers in Deerfield, over 70%, travel more than 10 miles to commute to work, and over 25% of those workers travel 25 or more miles.

Property Taxes . The development of Zion Woods will make land that was formerly tax-exempt into a taxable property by taxing the improvements that are constructed. The property will pay taxes as required by the County, including initial development impact fees to Deerfield taxing bodies.

Schools . The development team has been in contact with Michael Lubelfeld, Superintendent of District 109, and he has confirmed that the district does not have any overcrowding concerns nor do they have any opposition to the proposed housing development. The team has also spoken to George Fornero, Superintendent of District 113, who also stated that they foresee no overcrowding concerns.

Schedule The anticipated development schedule for Zion Woods is as follows:

Project Benchmark Date Complete PD* and CLOMR** Process October 2015 Close on Financing November 2015 Commence Construction December 2015 First Unit Available for Occupancy July 2016 Construction Completed December 2016 Stabilized Occupancy March 2017 *Planned Development **Conditional Letter of Map Revision that must be approved by FEMA.

Capitalization Plan The project will be financed through a combination of debt and equity sources. The majority of the equity will come through the sale of federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits that are allocated by the Illinois Housing Development Authority. The other sources of funding include a traditional first mortgage loan, a grant from a major bank, and, if awarded, a low-interest loan from the Lake County Consortium for Affordable Housing.

Development Team

Co-owners: Brinshore Development, LLC and Housing Opportunity Development Corporation General Contractor: McShane Construction Company Property Manager: Leasing & Management, Inc. Architect: Eckenhoff Saunders Architects Attorney: Applegate & Thorne-Thomsen Stormwater Management Brinshore Development is working closely with V3 Companies and McShane Construction to develop a stormwater management plan that is feasible from both an engineering and cost perspective. Because the site is so large, it allows for very cost effective engineering solutions including a detention pond and compensatory storage. Based on the Lake County Stormwater Ordinance, approximately 2.5 acre-feet of detention storage volume will be required for this project which will be contained in a detention basin located at the southeast corner of the site and will be planted with native and wetland type vegetation. The development will also require compensatory storage of 2.4 acre-feet which will be provided in a naturalized basin located at the northern end of the property. The basin at the northern end of the property will stay dry for most of the year unless the river breaches its banks. The basin at the southern end of the site will have a maximum of four feet of water in it during the most severe storm events and that water will drain within 48-72 hours. BRINSHORE Development, LLC ZION WOODS

Brinshore Development

DEVELOPMENT EXPERIENCE Founded in 1994, Brinshore Development, LLC is a private firm specializing in the development of affordable and mixed-income housing. David Brint and Richard Sciortino, Brinshore’s principals, each gained a decade worth of real estate development experience in affordable housing prior to co-founding Brinshore Development. Their expertise in all aspects of real estate development, helped to formulate a business plan that includes project conception through construction completion, ownership, and asset management.

To date, Brinshore has completed 50 tax credit funded projects, with several more under construction or development, comprised of over 4,000 apartments and homes valued at more than $1 Billion. Brinshore is one of the nation’s largest and most successful housing development firms in the affordable housing market. Their professional staff possesses a wealth of experience in using complex funding mechanisms to make its rental units affordable to families across the income spectrum, financing more than 70 projects with Low Income Housing Tax Credits and other forms of conventional and unconventional debt (of the 70 projects, 50 included LIHTC). Brinshore has built a diverse portfolio, including developments targeted at families with low to moderate incomes, senior communities, and a mix of market rate units. Brinshore has also developed more than 275 for-sale homes as well as more than 80,000 square feet of retail space.

Brinshore’s developments are located in cities across the country, including Indianapolis and Lafayette, Indiana; , WI; Ft. Madison, Iowa; Kalamazoo, Michigan; Omaha, Nebraska, and the following cities in Illinois: Aurora, Bloomington, Canton, Champaign, Chicago, Galesburg, Highland Park, Joliet, Lincoln, Matoon, Melrose Park, Naperville, Rock Island, Rockford, and Urbana. Brinshore will also be growing its presence in Kansas and Missouri with the opening of its new office.

Brinshore’s projects include rehabilitation, new construction, and historic renovation. Brinshore has experience in affordable and market rate residential family and senior rental as well as residential for sale, and retail/commercial rental. Brinshore also has expertise in developing affordable artist housing and permanent supportive housing. Brinshore also provides tax credit syndication services for The Richman Group on projects located throughout the Midwest.

Brinshore’s real estate activities are organized under three departments: development, asset management and equity syndication.

Development Brinshore Development specializes in the development of affordable and market-rate housing in inner-city neighborhoods, as well as the surrounding metropolitan areas by blending public and private resources. Brinshore is able to develop financially successful rental and home ownership options affordable to community residents. All of Brinshore’s developments are conceived with input and cooperation from local community officials and community organizations, and best efforts are put forth to provide employment opportunities for community residents. This combination of public, private and community involvement has proven to be an effective formula for successful residential developments.

Asset Management Brinshore Development asset manages over 5,000 apartments in conjunction. Brinshore reviews revenue and expense performance, conducts regular property inspections and reviews all property management policies and procedures.

BRINSHORE Development, LLC ZION WOODS

Equity Syndication Brinshore is the Midwest acquisition affiliate for the Richman Group, a national syndicator of Low-Income Housing Tax Credits. The syndication operations include due diligence, market analysis and transaction closings.

Development Experience

Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) Funded Projects Brinshore prides itself on its success in financing mixed income affordable rental housing using layered financing, including low income housing tax credits. Since its first project in 1994, Brinshore’s has been one of the most consistently successful developers in obtaining tax credit reservations from IHDA in Illinois, WHEDA in Wisconsin, IHCDA in Indiana, IFA in Iowa, MSHDA in Michigan, and the City of Chicago, Illinois receiving tax credits and closing on 50 projects. To enhance affordability for its residents, Brinshore has used more than 25 different subsidy programs in its developments, and is always prepared to learn the rules for new sources of finance. Brinshore leverages these scarce dollars with private funds to create needed affordable housing in mixed income settings and to catalyze neighborhood investment.

FUNDED TAX CREDIT DEVELOPMENTS

DEVELOPMENT TOTAL OTHER FUNDING STATUS UNITS Park Apartments 120 Trust Fund Bond Completed 1995 Chicago, IL Hollow Tree I 60 HOME Completed 1997 Galesburg, IL

South Park 46 Trust Fund Completed 1997 Chicago, IL Prairie Park 56 HOME, Trust Fund Completed 2000 Chicago, IL Empowerment Zone Larkin Village 476 Tax Exempt Bonds Completed 2000 Joliet, IL Hollow Tree II 40 HOME Completed 2001 Galesburg, IL DCCA Energy Grant Renaissance Gold 52 Historic Tax Credits, Risk Completed 2002 Rock Island, IL Sharing, Trust Fund, State (2 separate projects) Energy Grant, Façade Grant, City of Rock Island Melrose Commons 91 HOME Completed 2003 Melrose Park, IL Westhaven Park Apts. 155 HOPE VI, Trust Fund, AHP, Completed 2004 Chicago, IL HOME Sala Flats 33 Historic Tax Credits, Trust Completed 2005 Rock Island, IL Fund, State Energy Grant, Façade Grant, City of Rock Island BRINSHORE Development, LLC ZION WOODS

Mahalia Place 110 HOPE VI, AHP Completed 2005 Chicago, IL Red Maple Grove Ph. I 40 HOME, AHP Completed 2005 Indianapolis, IN Westhaven Park Tower 34 HOPE VI Completed 2006 Chicago, IL Douglass Park 50 HOME, Trust Fund, AHP Completed 2006 Champaign, IL Keystone Place 69 HOPE VI Trust Fund Completed 2007 Chicago, IL Hansberry Square 181 HOPE VI, HOME, Trust Fund, Completed 2007 Chicago, IL AHP Westhaven Park IIB 127 HOPE VI, HOME, Trust Fund, Completed 2008 Chicago, IL AHP Red Maple Grove IIA 60 HOPE VI, HOME, AHP Completed 2007 Indianapolis, IN Florida House 120 T/E Bonds, Trust Fund Completed 2007 Urbana, IL Sunnycrest Manor 101 T/E Bonds, Trust Fund Completed 2007 Urbana, IL Sunrise Apartments 120 T/E Bonds, Trust Fund Completed 2008 Mattoon, IL Anglers Manor 96 T/E Bonds, Trust Fund Completed 2007 Bloomington, IL Red Maple Grove IIB 65 HOPE VI, HOME, AHP Completed 2008 Indianapolis, IN Coleman Place 118 HOPE VI, HOME, AHP Completed 2008 Chicago, IL Westhaven Park IIC 92 HOPE VI Completed 2010 Chicago, IL Savoy Square 138 HOPE VI, HOME, AHP Completed 2010 Chicago, IL

Hopkins Place 56 HOME Completed 2010 Madison, WI Crystal View Apartments 70 HOME, AHP, FAF Completed 2010 Urbana, IL Heart and Hope Place 24 Exchange Credits Completed 2011 Milwaukee, WI Franklin Square 37 TIF, Exchange Credits Completed 2011 Madison, WI Hairpin Lofts 28 Historic Tax Credits, New Completed 2011 Chicago, IL Markets Tax Credits, TIF, BRINSHORE Development, LLC ZION WOODS

Donation Tax Credits

Park Douglas 137 ARRA, Donation Tax Credits, Completed 2012 Chicago, IL HOME Chatham Square 89 NSP, HOME, TIF Completed 2012 Lafayette, IN Bluff Apartments 40 HOME, 1602, Housing Completed 2012 Ft. Madison, IA Enterprise Zone Park Apts 120 1602, IHDA Risk Share Completed 2012 Redevelopment Chicago, IL Century City 37 NSP Completed 2012 Milwaukee, WI Emerson Square 32 NSP, HOME, AHP, CDBG IKE, Competed 2013 Evanston, IL Donation Tax Credits Lindsay NSP 40 NSP, AHP Completed 2013 Milwaukee, WI Diplomat (Buffett Place) 51 AHP, Donation Tax Credits, Completed 2013 Chicago, IL BIBP Grant Ashland Place 42 HOME, Trust Fund, Energy Completed 2013 Canton, IL Grant New Village 152 Fannie Mae DUS, IRP, Completed 2014 Kalamazoo, MI Kalamazoo Community Foundation Dorchester Artist 32 AHP, Donation Tax Credits, Construction 2013 Housing CHA Capital Chicago, IL Plowfield Square 40 Donation Tax Credits, HOME, Construction 2013 Lincoln, IL Trust Funds Legends South C-3 71 CHA Funds, TIF Construction 2014 Chicago, IL

NSP Funded Projects Brinshore has also used the Neighborhood Stabilization Program effectively to purchase foreclosed and vacant properties and create affordable housing in several municipalities, including Chicago and Evanston, IL; Lafayette, IN; and Milwaukee, WI.

NSP Funded Developments

Project and Location Number NSP Amount Status of Units Evanston Scattered Sites 100 $14,200,000 Construction 2011 Evanston, IL BRINSHORE Development, LLC ZION WOODS

Emerson Square 32 $2,085,000 Completed 2013 Evanston, IL Ironwood Court 46 $5,212,466 Completed 2011 Chicago, IL Boxelder Court 19 $2,553,841 Completed 2012 Chicago, IL Chatham Square Rental 89 $5,200,000 Completed 2012 Lafayette, IN Chatham Square For Sale 3 $450,000 Completed 2013

Century City 37 $495,000 Completed 2012 Milwaukee, WI Lindsay 40 $1,150,000 Completed 2013 Milwaukee, WI Winterberry Place 21 $4,245,713 Completed 2013 Chicago, IL Aurora Impact Initiative 40 $1,500,000 Construction 2014 Aurora, IL

Senior Affordable Rental and For Sale Another specialty of Brinshore is our expertise in developing senior housing. Recent projects include a 56- unit new construction development in Milwaukee, Wisconsin; a 91-unit tax credit new construction development in Melrose Park, Illinois which is part of a continuum of care campus; three rehab preservation deals including a total of 341 units in Central Illinois; and an innovative 60-unit new construction development in Highland Park, Illinois that included 48 affordable for sale senior condominiums and 12 affordable senior rental units.

SENIOR DEVELOPMENTS

For Sale

DEVELOPMENT TOTAL OTHER FUNDING STATUS UNITS Sunset Woods 60 Trust Fund Completed 2002 Highland Park, IL Melrose Commons 91 Tax Credits, HOME Completed 2003 Melrose Park, IL Florida House 120 Tax Credits, T/E Bonds, Completed 2007 Urbana, IL Trust Fund Sunnycrest Manor 101 Tax Credits, T/E Bonds, Completed 2007 Urbana, IL Trust Fund Anglers Manor 96 Tax Credits, T/E Bonds, Completed 2007 Bloomington, IL Trust Fund Hopkins Place 56 Tax Credits Completed 2009 Milwaukee, WI BRINSHORE Development, LLC ZION WOODS

Brinshore has also been successful as a developer of for sale housing. Recent projects include the historic renovation of the Kent Mansion and new construction townhome development on Michigan Avenue on Chicago’s Near South Side; a three-phase condominium rehabilitation and new construction townhome project in Chicago’s Kenwood-Oakland neighborhood; a new construction townhome development on the riverfront in Naperville, Illinois; and a new construction affordable senior condominium development in Highland Park, Illinois.

FOR SALE HOUSING

DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION TOTAL STATUS TYPE UNITS Kent Mansion Townhomes New Construction 7 Completed 1998 Chicago, IL Kent Mansion Condominiums Historic 5 Completed 1999 Chicago, IL Rehabilitation River Bend Heights Townhomes New Construction 18 Completed 2000 Naperville, IL Ellington Court Rehabilitation/ 6 Condos Condos 2000 Chicago, IL New Construction 8 Townhomes Townhomes 2001 Ellington Place Rehabilitation 22 Completed 2002 Chicago, IL Sunset Woods New Construction 60 Completed 2002 Highland Park, IL Westhaven Park Tower New Construction 79 Completed 2006 Chicago, IL City Flats New Construction 60 Completed 2007 Chicago, IL Hyacinth Place New Construction 14 Completed 2009 Highland Park, IL Red Maple Grove New Construction 52 Commenced 2010 (sales Indianapolis, IN underway) Chatham Square New Construction 9 Completed 2013 Lafayette, IN LiveEvanston Rehab/New 50 Commenced 2011 (sales Evanston, IL Construction underway)

BRINSHORE Development, LLC ZION WOODS

Public Housing Redevelopment Brinshore is the Master Developer of ten large public housing redevelopment projects, including the Robert Taylor Homes, Henry Horner Homes, Park Douglas, 45th and Cottage, Maplewood Courts and Lawndale Complex in Chicago, IL; Burch Village in Champaign, IL; Lakeside Terrace in Urbana, IL; Brokenburr Trails in Indianapolis, IN. We were also the Financial Consultant for the Harrison Homes and Planning Consultant for the Taft Homes for the Peoria Housing Authority in Peoria, Illinois and we are partnered with the Aurora Housing Authority on a 40 units, scattered site, single family vacant and foreclosed rehabilitation project in Aurora, IL. Brinshore was successful in preparing HOPE VI applications for Robert Taylor Homes in 2001 and Brokenburr in 2003. Several phases of development are now complete at Henry Horner Homes, Robert Taylor, Red Maple Grove, Burch Village and Lakeside Terrace. Please refer to the next document for Brinshore’s relevant experience partnering with public housing authorities on mixed income/mixed finance redevelopment.

LIST OF PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY PROCUREMENTS

PUBLIC HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TOTAL ROLE AUTHORITY UNITS

Chicago Housing Robert Taylor Homes 2400 Master Developer (MD) Authority (IL) Henry Horner Homes 742 MD

45th and Cottage Grove 180 MD

Clybourn and Division 62 MD

Maplewood Courts 70 MD Lawndale Complex 300 MD Housing Authority Burch Village 50 MD of Champaign County (IL) Lakeside Terrace 70 MD Indianapolis Brokenburr Trails 217 MD Housing Authority (IN) Aurora Housing Jericho Circle Replacement 40 Co-Developer Authority (IL)

Peoria Housing Taft Homes 250 Master Planner Authority (IL)

Harrison Homes 50 Consultant

Housing Authority Chouteau Courts Replacement 300 Master Developer and Co- of Kansas City Developer (MO)

BRINSHORE Development, LLC ZION WOODS

Retail Brinshore possesses expertise in retail development, and has built and leased both stand-alone retail developments, and retail as a component of a mixed use residential development.

RETAIL

DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION SQUARE FEET STATUS TYPE Stony Island Plaza Rehab 20,000 Completed 2007 1500 Webster New Construction 20,000 Completed 2009 Chicago, IL Westhaven Park New Construction 4,500 Completed 2010 Chicago, IL Hairpin Lofts Rehab 14,000 Completed 2011 Chicago, IL Buffett Place Rehab 1,897 Completed 2013

Supportive Housing and Services Brinshore is also experienced at providing supportive housing to special needs populations. Below is a snapshot of several projects listed above which highlights some specific strategies for providing supportive housing and supportive services.

• Four (4) units at Red Maple Grove, in Indianapolis, are allocated for formerly homeless individuals. The units are seamlessly interspersed among other units in the project.

• Brinshore Development and the Lester and Rosalie Anixter Center are the joint developers of Hairpin Lofts, a historic renovation of a 1920s building into 28 loft-style one and two bedroom rental apartments, retail space and community arts space. Anixter Center serves as the non-profit partner by providing services to developmentally disabled residents and arts programming for people with special needs.

• At Hollow Tree, in Galesburg, Illinois, Brinshore partnered with Bridgeway, Inc., a not-for-profit human services organization dedicated to improving the lives of individuals with disabilities in west central Illinois and southeast Iowa, and provided a portion of the units to developmentally disabled persons who are ready to be “mainstreamed” into the community from a group home into an apartment.

• At Westhaven Park, Project Match, a non-profit that is an affiliate of the Ericson Institute, provides cutting edge self-sufficiency programming like the “Pathways to Rewards Program”. In the Pathways to Rewards Program, participants receive cash incentives to take steps towards self- sufficiency. This program is funded by the MacArthur Foundation and has been replicated across the country.

BRINSHORE Development, LLC ZION WOODS

AWARDS

Jack Kemp Workforce Housing Models of Excellence Award – 2010 Urban Land Institute Terwiller Center for Workforce Housing • Hyacinth Place Townhomes, Highland Park, IL (2010)

Good Neighbor Award: - Chicago Association of Realtors • Hyacinth Place Townhomes, Highland Park, IL (2010)

Best Urban Multifamily Development - State of Indiana Governor’s Award for Excellence in Affordable Housing • Red Maple Grove, Indianapolis, IN (2008)

Development of the Year Award: 2008 - Lake County Stormwater Management Commission • Hyacinth Place Townhomes, Highland Park, IL (2008)

Historic Preservation Award for Outstanding Rehabilitation - Richard H. Driehaus Foundation • Sala Flats, Rock Island, IL (2006)

Mixed-Income Project of the Year - HanleyWood Multi Family Executive • Westhaven Park Apartments, Chicago, IL (2005)

Outstanding For-Profit Neighborhood Real Estate Project Award - Chicago Neighborhood Development Awards • Westhaven Park Apartments, Chicago, IL (2005)

GREEN DESIGN

• Hyacinth Place Townhomes - LEED for Homes: Gold Certified • Hairpin Lofts – LEED Gold (under construction) • Westhaven Park IIB – EnergyStar Certified • Westhaven Park IIC - EnergyStar Certified • Hansberry Square - EnergyStar Certified • Savory Square - EnergyStar Certified • Coleman Place - EnergyStar Certified

KEY STAFF

Brinshore’s professional development staff contains 12 professionals with an average of over 20 years of experience. The following Brinshore staff will be involved in this project. Their resumes are attached as an exhibit to this section 3.a. • David B. Brint, Chief Executive Officer • Richard J. Sciortino, President • Cindy Bell, Director of Asset Management • Michael Cornell, Direct of Construction • Monika Bogdanska, Financial Accounting • Dawni Freeman, Project Manager

HOUSING OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Previous Experience

Housing Opportunity Development Corporation (HODC) is the largest community-based nonprofit developer of permanent low- and moderate-income housing serving north suburban Cook County and suburban Lake and McHenry Counties. Our goal is to develop, manage and preserve the stock of housing that is affordable to low- and moderate-income people throughout the northern suburbs. We do this by developing both rental and for-sale housing and through both rehabilitation and new construction. We serve families, seniors, persons with disabilities, individuals and local workers.

Founded in 1983, HODC has developed 18 affordable properties with 257 units and currently manages 226 units throughout the suburbs including: • a 12-unit rental building in Skokie purchased in 1987 funded by local investors located at 4831 Conrad and rehabilitated in 2010 managed by HODC. • an 11-unit walk-up in Skokie, purchased in 1994 located at 4845 Conrad and rehabilitated in 2010 that serves very low income families managed by HODC. • a 13-unit mixed income property in Evanston purchased and rehabilitated in 1998 located at 743 Brummel managed by HODC. • a 4-flat in Evanston developed in 2000 with funding from local investors at 131 Callan and rehabilitated in 2012 when a solar thermal heating system was installed which is managed by HODC. • a 48 unit building with studios in Evanston purchased in 2000 with rehabilitation completed in 2002 for very low income and homeless individuals at 319 Dempster managed by HODC. • a new 60-unit senior project for the City of Highland Park as a joint venture with Brinshore Development in 2002 that includes affordable condominiums and rental units which are managed by HODC. • a 2-unit, 8 person group home in Skokie for eight adults with mental illness developed for New Foundation Center in 2003 with funding from HUD’s Supportive Housing Program. • a 4-flat in Skokie developed for WINGS in 2003 with funding from HUD to provide housing for homeless women with children, including victims of domestic violence. • 3 large duplexes in Evanston that were donated to HODC and rehabilitated in 2003/2004 and 2010 managed by HODC. • a 56-unit senior apartment building in Morton Grove purchased and rehabilitated in 2004 in partnership with Turnstone Development. This preservation deal had an expired Section 8 rental assistance contract that we renewed. An onsite service coordinator helps seniors access services and keep active • 2 homes for homeless families in Northbrook and Northfield purchased and rehabilitated in 2006 with funding from HUD’s Supportive Housing Program managed by HODC. • 14 new townhomes in Highland Park built with green components completed in 2009 including ten units for homeownership and four rentals which are managed by HODC. • 2 previously foreclosed homes in Streamwood and Hanover Park that were acquired and rehabilitated in 2011 using federal foreclosure funds and returned to productive use. • 6 new units built in 2012 in Woodstock after HODC was selected to complete a stalled project to provide permanent supportive housing. The homes were donated to Home of the Sparrow who provides housing and services for homeless women with children. • 2 homes in Deerfield that HODC helped another nonprofit called Deerfield Affordable Housing to purchase and rehabilitate in 2013 which are managed by HODC. • 5 units in two properties that were rehabilitated in 2012 under the Neighborhood Stabilization Program in Fox River Grove and Woodstock and given to Home of the Sparrow. • A 97 unit senior building in Deerfield which is just managed by HODC.

In addition, HODC operates a housing counseling program that has helped over thirty households purchase homes and serves over 100 home seekers each year. Monthly homebuyer workshops cover all aspects of ownership. One-on-one meetings help potential buyers create a plan for purchasing their own home. Our employer-assisted housing program helps workers live near their jobs.

The organization is a certified Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) as well as a HUD-certified housing counseling agency. The Board of Directors includes local citizens, real estate professionals, and community leaders.

HODC’s outreach and education program advocates for affordable housing in the region and provides technical assistance and advice on affordable housing issues to local communities such as the Evanston Inclusionary Zoning Task Force, Glencoe Senior Housing Task Force, Morton Grove Senior Housing Task Force, and Highland Park Housing Commission.

HODC’s mission is predicated on creating diverse communities: that making additional, affordable housing available, even in small increments, is significant and a step closer to an inclusive community. We take a holistic approach to development that includes building welcoming communities and creating opportunities for collaboration with municipalities, employers, tenants and neighbors.

Richard Koenig, Executive Director, 2001 Waukegan Rd, PO Box 480, Techny, IL 60082 847-564-2900, fax 847-564-2992, e-mail [email protected], www.hodc.org 3/15

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

REPORT FOR:

Brinshore Development, LLC

ZION LUTHERAN MIXED USE 10 DEERFIELD ROAD DEERFIELD, ILLINOIS

PREPARED BY:

V3 Companies 7325 Janes Avenue Woodridge, Illinois 60517

V3 Project No. 15033

April 10, 2015 Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION ...... 1 II. PROJECT CONDITIONS ...... 4 Land Uses ...... 4 Roadway System ...... 4 Public Transportation System ...... 4 Traffic Volumes ...... 7 Proposed Development ...... 7 Land Use Development ...... 7 Roadway Development ...... 7 III. TRAFFIC FORECASTS ...... 9 Project Traffic Volumes ...... 9 Trip Generation ...... 9 Trip Distribution and Assignment...... 9 Background Traffic Volumes ...... 10 Future Traffic Volumes ...... 10 IV. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ...... 14 Capacity Analysis ...... 14 Queue Length Analysis ...... 16 V. CONCLUSIONS ...... 17

- i -

Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

FIGURES Figure 1: Site Location Map ...... 2 Figure 2: Conceptual Site Plan ...... 3 Figure 3: Land Use Map ...... 5 Figure 4: Existing Lane Configuration ...... 6 Figure 5: Existing Traffic Volume ...... 8 Figure 6: Project Trips ...... 11 Figure 7: Background Traffic Volume ...... 12 Figure 8: Future with Project Traffic Volume ...... 13

TABLES Table 1: Trip Generation ...... 9 Table 2: Level of Service Definitions for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections ...... 14 Table 3: Signalized LOS – Deerfield Road and Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue ...... 15 Table 4: Unsignalized LOS – Deerfield Road and Zion Driveway ...... 16 Table 5: Left Turn 95th Percentile Queue at Deerfield Rd and Heather Rd/Carlisle Ave ...... 16

APPENDICES Appendix A Existing Traffic Count Appendix B Capacity Analysis Worksheets – Existing Appendix C Capacity Analysis Worksheets – 2020 Background Appendix D Capacity Analysis Worksheets – 2020 Future with Project

- ii -

Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

I. INTRODUCTION

V3 Companies has been retained by Brinshore Development, LLC to conduct a traffic impact study for a proposed housing development on the existing Zion Lutheran Church property located at 10 Deerfield Road, east of Heather Road, in Deerfield, Illinois. The property currently contains multiple buildings owned by Zion Lutheran Church and approximately eight acres of undeveloped land. The property is bounded by Deerfield Road to the south, the North Branch Chicago River to the east, and private homes to the north and west. The site is accessed through a two lane driveway on Deerfield Road that will be referred to as “Zion Driveway” throughout this report. A site location map is included as Figure 1.

The planned development will consist of 48 affordable housing apartment units located north of the existing church. The current site plan calls for 12 one-bedroom units, 24 two-bedroom units, and 12 three-bedroom units and a total of 156 parking spaces to be shared between the proposed apartments and the existing church. A conceptual site plan is included as Figure 2.

The purpose of this report is to evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed development which is expected to be built out in 2015. Traffic estimates are projected for 2020, which is five years beyond the opening date. The study area consists of the signalized intersection of Deerfield Road and Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue and the existing unsignalized three-legged intersection of Deerfield Road and Zion Driveway.

This report includes a description of existing conditions, data collection and capacity analysis, evaluation of data, and conclusions.

- 1 -

Figure 1 - Site Location Plan.dgn 4/10/2015 8:02:21 AM

Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

II. PROJECT CONDITIONS

Land Uses

Several land uses exist near the project site, including institutional, recreational, and residential uses. The surrounding land uses are illustrated in Figure 3.

Roadway System

The characteristics of the roadways in the vicinity of the site are presented below. The existing lane configurations at the study area intersections are illustrated in Figure 4.

Deerfield Road is four-lane east-west arterial with a striped median and a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Left turn lanes are provided on Deerfield Road on both the eastbound and westbound approaches to Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue and the eastbound approach to Zion Driveway. Sidewalks are provided on the north and south side of Deerfield Road. A crosswalk is provided on the west leg of the Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue intersection.

Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue is a two-lane local roadway with a posted speed limit of 25 mph that provides access to the residential neighborhoods. The street is named Heather Road to the north of Deerfield Road and Carlisle Avenue to the south. Both the northbound and southbound approaches to Deerfield Road consist of a shared left turn/through lane and a right turn lane. Sidewalks are provided on the east and west side of the roadway. Crosswalks are provided on both approaches of the Deerfield Road intersection.

Zion Driveway is a two-lane private driveway that provides access to the Zion Lutheran Church. Although no stop sign is currently provided, the driveway operates as a stop controlled approach. The driveway is a full access driveway with an eastbound left turn lane on Deerfield Road.

Public Transportation System

Two key transit agencies provide public transportation options in the vicinity of the study area – Pace operates fixed bus routes along Deerfield Road and Metra provides commuter heavy rail east and west of the proposed development. Pace Route 471 travels along Deerfield Road and provides weekday and Saturday service between Highland Park and Northbrook. This route provides service to the Metra UP-North Line Highland Park Station, Metra Milwaukee District – North Line , Deerbrook Shopping Center, Northbrook Court, and Crossroads Shopping Center. Minor Pace bus stops are provided along Deerfield Road at Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue and Villas Court. The Metra Milwaukee District – North Line Deerfield Station is located approximately one mile west of the proposed development and rail service between Chicago and Fox Lake with 22 rail stations.

- 4 -

Figure 3 - Land Use Map.dgn 4/10/2015 8:01:12 AM D

AN

R

R

R

H

E

E

H

H

RC

T

T

U

A

L

HU

E

C

H

ON

I

Z

DEERFIELD RD

E

AV

LE

S

I

L

R

A

C

LEGEND

- EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL

FIGURE 4 ZION LUTHERAN EXISTING LANE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT CONFIGURATION DEERFIELD ILLINOIS

E:\2015\15033\Drawings\mstn\Exhibits\Figure 4 - Lane Configuration.dgn 4/16/2015 3:27:57 PM Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

Traffic Volumes

To assist in the evaluation of the traffic impact on the roadway system resulting from the proposed development, the existing intersection vehicular traffic volumes were collected at the signalized intersection of Deerfield Road and Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue and at the unsignalized Zion Driveway.

Manual vehicle counts were conducted Thursday, March 26th, 2015 at the study area intersections. The weekday morning peak period counts occurred from 7:00 am to 9:00 am and the weekday evening peak period counts occurred from 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm. The count periods were selected to be consistent with traditional peak hours for collector roadways and when similar residential developments generate the most vehicle traffic.

The traffic volumes collected indicate that the weekday peak hours occur from 8:00 am to 9:00 am and 4:45 pm to 5:45 pm. The existing peak hour vehicular volumes at the study area intersections are illustrated in Figure 5. A summary of the traffic volumes collected in fifteen minute increments is provided in Appendix A.

Proposed Development

Land Use Development

There are no known proposed land development projects in the vicinity of the site that will significantly impact the study area.

Roadway Development

Several improvement projects are planned along Deerfield Road. However, it is our understanding that all work in the area of the proposed development will be limited in scope to resurfacing projects that will not alter operations around the development. There are no other roadway developments in the vicinity of the site that will significantly impact the study area.

- 7 -

D

AN

R

R

R

H

E

E

H

H

RC

T

T

U

A

L

HU

E

C )

H )

ON

) 11 ) )

I

(

10 1 5 8

Z

( ( ( (

9 2 25 3 2

7 (14) 794 (1091) 0 (6) 12 (38) 810 (1138) DEERFIELD RD

7 (10) 2 (3) 932 (1011) 983 (1048) 18 (39) ) ) ) 0 ( 29 37

( (

3

E 28 54

AV

LE

S

I

L

R

A

C

LEGEND

## - AM PEAK HOUR

(##)- PM PEAK HOUR

AM PEAK HOUR: 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM

PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM

FIGURE 5 ZION LUTHERAN EXISTING TRAFFIC MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES DEERFIELD ILLINOIS

E:\2015\15033\Drawings\mstn\Exhibits\Figure 5 - Existing Traffic Volumes.dgn 4/16/2015 3:27:58 PM Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

III. TRAFFIC FORECASTS

Project Traffic Volumes

Trip Generation

The planned development will consist of a mix of one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments totaling 48 dwelling units. Project traffic is estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The following land use categories are used to determine project traffic:

Apartment (220) – Apartments are rental dwelling units located within the same building with at least three other dwelling-units, quadraplexes and all types of apartment buildings.

The Trip Generation Manual assigns trip generation rates based on a peak period and an independent variable. The most common independent variable is dwelling units for residential land uses. The am and pm trip generation rates are selected as the average rate for weekday peak hour of adjacent street traffic for one hour from 7 am to 9 am and 4 pm to 6 pm for each one of the land uses in the proposed development. Table 1 provides a summary of the trip generation for the proposed development.

Table 1: Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Units In Out Total In Out Total

Dwelling Apartment 48 5 1924191130 Units

Trip Distribution and Assignment

The direction from which traffic approaches and departs a site is a function of numerous variables, including location of residences, location of employment centers, location of commercial/retail centers, available roadway systems, location and number of access points, and level of congestion on adjacent road systems.

The directional distribution of traffic generated by the site is assigned based on existing traffic patterns in the area. Inbound and outbound trips are evenly split between eastbound and westbound Deerfield Road. The directional distribution and assignment of new project peak hour traffic to the study area intersections is illustrated in Figure 6.

- 9 -

Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

Background Traffic Volumes

Background traffic volumes are estimated for the year 2020, which is five years beyond the anticipated build out in 2015. These volumes account for future non-project related growth in the area. A growth rate of 1.0 percent per year is applied to the existing traffic volumes to estimate 2020 peak hour traffic. The background traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 7.

Future Traffic Volumes

The project traffic volume is added to the background volume to obtain the future peak hour traffic volumes for the study intersections. Future with project traffic volumes are depicted in Figure 8.

- 10 -

SITE

D

AN

R

R

R

H

E

E

H

H

RC

T

T

U

A

L

HU

E

C

H

) )

ON 6

I

5

(

(

Z

10 9

10 (6) 2 (9)

DEERFIELD RD 50% 50%

3 (10) 3 (10)

E

AV

LE

S

I

L

R

A

C

LEGEND

## - AM PEAK HOUR

(##)- PM PEAK HOUR

AM PEAK HOUR: 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM

PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM

FIGURE 6 ZION LUTHERAN PROJECT TRAFFIC MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES DEERFIELD ILLINOIS

E:\2015\15033\Drawings\mstn\Exhibits\Figure 6 - Project Traffic Volumes.dgn 4/16/2015 3:27:58 PM NOTE:

BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES = EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES + 1% GROWTH PER YEAR TO 2020

(FIGURE 6)

D

AN

R

R

R

H

E

E

H

H

RC

T

T

U

A

L

HU

E

C )

H )

ON

) 12 ) )

I

(

11 1 5 8

Z

( ( ( (

9 2 26 3 2

7 (15) 834 (1146) 0 (6) 13 (40) 851 (1196) DEERFIELD RD

7 (11) 2 (3) 979 (1062) 1032 (1101) 19 (41) ) ) ) 0 ( 30 39

( (

3

E 29 57

AV

LE

S

I

L

R

A

C

LEGEND

## - AM PEAK HOUR

(##)- PM PEAK HOUR

AM PEAK HOUR: 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM

PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM

FIGURE 7 ZION LUTHERAN BACKGROUND TRAFFIC MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES DEERFIELD ILLINOIS

E:\2015\15033\Drawings\mstn\Exhibits\Figure 7 - Background Traffic Volumes.dgn 4/16/2015 3:27:58 PM NOTE:

FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES = EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES + BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES

(FIGURE 6) (FIGURE 7)

SITE

D

AN

R

R

R

H

E

E

H

H

RC

T

T

U

A

L

HU

E

C

) ) )

H )

ON

) 12 11 13

I

( ( (

11 1

Z

( (

9 2 26 13 11

7 (15) 844 (1151) 2 (15) 13 (40) 851 (1196) DEERFIELD RD

7 (11) 5 (13) 982 (1072) 1032 (1101) 19 (41) ) ) ) 0 ( 30 39

( (

3

E 29 57

AV

LE

S

I

L

R

A

C

LEGEND

## - AM PEAK HOUR

(##)- PM PEAK HOUR

AM PEAK HOUR: 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM

PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM

FIGURE 8 ZION LUTHERAN FUTURE TRAFFIC MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES DEERFIELD ILLINOIS

E:\2015\15033\Drawings\mstn\Exhibits\Figure 8 - Future Traffic Volumes.dgn 4/16/2015 3:27:59 PM Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

IV. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Capacity Analysis

The operation of a facility is evaluated based on level of service (LOS) calculations obtained by analytical methods defined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2010 Edition. The concept of LOS is defined as a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.

There are six LOS letter designations, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst.

The LOS of an intersection is based on the average control delay per vehicle. For a signalized intersection, the delay is calculated for each lane group and then aggregated for each approach and for the intersection as a whole. Generally, the LOS is reported for the intersection as a whole. For an unsignalized intersection, the delay is only calculated and reported for each minor movement. An overall intersection LOS is not calculated.

There are different LOS criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections primarily due to driver perceptions of transportation facilities. The perception is that a signalized intersection is expected to carry higher traffic volumes and experience a greater average delay than an unsignalized intersection. The LOS criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections are provided in Table 2.

Table 2: Level of Service Definitions for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Control Delay Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) (seconds/vehicle) A < 10 ≤ 10.0 B > 10.0 and ≤ 20.0 > 10.0 and ≤ 15.0 C > 20.0 and ≤ 35.0 > 15.0 and ≤ 25.0 D > 35.0 and ≤ 55.0 > 25.0 and ≤ 35.0 E > 55.0 and ≤ 80.0 > 35.0 and ≤ 50.0 F > 80.0 > 50.0 Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual 2010, National Research Council, 2010.

Typically, various state and local governments adopt operating standards varying between LOS C and LOS E, depending on the area’s size and roadway characteristics. Based on our past experience with the Village of Deerfield, LOS D or better has been the accepted operating standard.

- 14 -

Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

The study area consists of the signalized intersection of Deerfield Road and Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue and the unsignalized intersection of Deerfield Road and Zion Driveway. Capacity analysis is performed with Synchro 7, a microsimulation modeling program. Models are created to evaluate the existing, background, and future with project traffic volumes for the am and pm peak hours. Results of the capacity analysis are summarized in Table 3 for the intersection of Deerfield Road and Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue. Supporting analysis worksheets from Synchro 7 for the existing, background, and future traffic conditions are provided in Appendices B, C and D.

Table 3: Signalized LOS – Deerfield Road and Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue Eastbound WestboundNorthbound Southbound Intersection Peak Scenario Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay Hour LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) Existing 26.3 C 23.4 C 15.1 B 16.7 B 24.4 C AM Background 25.7 C 22.7 C 15.6 B 17.5 B 23.8 C Future 25.6 C 22.7 C 15.7 B 17.5 B 23.8 C Existing 24.0 C 20.1 C 17.7 B 19.3 B 21.8 C PM Background 23.6 C 19.8 B 18.1 B 19.4 B 21.5 C Future 23.5 C 19.6 B 18.2 B 19.5 B 21.4 C

Based on the analysis of existing traffic volumes, the signalized intersection on Deerfield Road and Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue operates at LOS C during the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches to the intersection also operate at LOS C or better. Delay slightly increases on the minor approaches in the background scenario, due to the larger increase of traffic on Deerfield Road. However, since the signal timing favors Deerfield Road, delay on the east and westbound approaches and the overall intersection decrease slightly. The westbound approach improves from LOS C to LOS B during the PM peak hour. The trend of slight delay decreases on Deerfield Road and slight increases on the side streets continues with the addition of project related trips, although there are no changes in LOS. Therefore, there are no anticipated LOS concerns at the signalized intersection in the future with project condition.

Results of the capacity analysis are summarized in Table 4 for the intersection of Deerfield Road and Zion Driveway. At the unsignalized intersection, the eastbound left turn and southbound movements currently operate at LOS C or better. Delay increases slightly in the background condition but no change in the LOS occurs for during either peak hour. Delay increases slightly more in the future with project scenario, with the southbound approach falling from LOS B to LOS C. Despite the increase in delay, the approach still operates at an acceptable level of service. Therefore, there are no anticipated LOS concerns at the unsignalized intersection of Deerfield Road and Zion Driveway in the future with project condition.

- 15 -

Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

Table 4: Unsignalized LOS – Deerfield Road and Zion Driveway Eastbound Left Southbound Peak Scenario Delay Delay Hour LOS LOS (sec) (sec) Existing 9.6 A 12.6 B AM Background 9.8 A 13.2 B Future 9.8 A 19.4 C Existing 11.3 B 18.1 C PM Background 11.6 B 19.1 C Future 11.8 B 19.1 C

Queue Length Analysis

The 95th percentile queue lengths are also analyzed based on the results of the Synchro analysis. Typically, the queue lengths for left turn movements at signalized intersections are reported as the critical queue lengths. The left turn queue lengths for the signalized intersection of Deerfield Road and Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue are summarized in Table 4.

Table 5: Left Turn 95th Percentile Queue at Deerfield Rd and Heather Rd/Carlisle Ave Queue Length (ft.) Peak Hour Scenario NB SB EB Left WB Left Through/Left Through/Left Existing7105632 AM Background6106034 Future6106034 Existing7184320 PM Background8184521 Future8184521

In all scenarios, the longest queues occur in the shared through/left turn lanes on the northbound and southbound approaches to Deerfield Road. However, no queue lengths exceed the provide storage lengths. Therefore, no queuing issues are anticipated at this intersection.

- 16 -

Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

V. CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of a proposed housing development on the Zion Lutheran Church property located at 10 Deerfield Road in Deerfield, Illinois. The proposed development will consist of 48 apartment units on approximately nine acres of land. The development will include 156 parking spaces that will provide parking for the apartments and the church. Access to the site will be provided through the existing driveway on Deerfield Road.

This study analyzed the traffic impacts of the proposed development during the weekday am and pm peak hours. Traffic was estimated for the year 2020, which is five years beyond the anticipated opening.

Based on the results of the traffic analysis, the existing roadway system will handle the additional traffic generated by this development. Both the signalized intersection of Deerfield Road and Heather Road/Carlisle Avenue and the unsignalized intersection of Deerfield Road and the Zion Driveway operate at an acceptable level of service with the addition of development trips. Likewise, all projected queue lengths are accommodated by the existing storage lengths. No roadway improvements are needed on Deerfield Road as a result of this development.

- 17 -

Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

APPENDIX A

EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNT

- 18 -

V3 Companies 7325 Janes Avenue Woodridge, IL 60517 Project: Zion Lutheran Mixed Use File Name : Full Day Count Location: Deerfield & Carlisle/Heather Site Code : 15033 Weather: Dry Start Date : 3/26/2015 Counted by: V3 Page No : 1

CARLISLE AVENUE HEATHER ROADGroups Printed- Unshifted DEERFIELD ROAD DEERFIELD ROAD Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound App. App. App. App. Int. Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Total Total Total Total Total 07:00 AM 11 0 2 0 13 5 0 1 1 7 1 153 3 0 157 1 148 0 0 149 326 07:15 AM 23 1 3 0 27 4 1 2 0 7 1 172 7 0 180 2 160 1 0 163 377 07:30 AM 18 0 3 0 21 4 0 9 0 13 2 178 8 0 188 2 222 4 0 228 450 07:45 AM 19 0 13 0 32 5 0 1 0 6 4 227 10 0 241 5 232 3 0 240 519 Total 71 1 21 0 93 18 1 13 1 33 8 730 28 0 766 10 762 8 0 780 1672

08:00 AM 13 0 9 0 22 5 1 2 0 8 0 193 6 0 199 4 191 1 0 196 425 08:15 AM 13 3 8 0 24 3 1 3 0 7 4 194 4 0 202 4 166 2 0 172 405 08:30 AM 16 0 2 0 18 4 0 1 0 5 2 267 4 0 273 2 216 1 0 219 515 08:45 AM 12 0 9 0 21 13 0 3 0 16 1 278 4 0 283 2 221 3 0 226 546 Total 54 3 28 0 85 25 2 9 0 36 7 932 18 0 957 12 794 7 0 813 1891

*** BREAK ***

04:00 PM 6 0 8 0 14 5 0 3 0 8 1 213 11 0 225 9 236 2 0 247 494 04:15 PM 7 0 9 0 16 1 0 2 0 3 2 225 3 0 230 8 251 2 0 261 510 04:30 PM 10 1 3 0 14 10 0 3 0 13 1 205 7 0 213 10 260 5 0 275 515 04:45 PM 7 0 9 0 16 3 0 3 0 6 3 241 10 0 254 6 271 1 0 278 554 Total 30 1 29 0 60 19 0 11 0 30 7 884 31 0 922 33 1018 10 0 1061 2073

05:00 PM 12 0 6 0 18 2 0 1 0 3 2 239 10 0 251 13 287 3 0 303 575 05:15 PM 11 0 6 0 17 3 1 4 0 8 3 272 7 0 282 13 306 5 0 324 631 05:30 PM 7 0 8 0 15 3 0 2 0 5 2 259 12 0 273 6 227 5 0 238 531 05:45 PM 13 0 2 0 15 3 1 7 0 11 4 198 16 0 218 12 276 5 0 293 537 Total 43 0 22 0 65 11 2 14 0 27 11 968 45 0 1024 44 1096 18 0 1158 2274

Grand Total 198 5 100 0 303 73 5 47 1 126 33 3514 122 0 3669 99 3670 43 0 3812 7910 Apprch % 65.3 1.7 33 0 57.9 4 37.3 0.8 0.9 95.8 3.3 0 2.6 96.3 1.1 0 Total % 2.5 0.1 1.3 0 3.8 0.9 0.1 0.6 0 1.6 0.4 44.4 1.5 0 46.4 1.3 46.4 0.5 0 48.2 V3 Companies 7325 Janes Avenue Woodridge, IL 60517 Project: Zion Lutheran Mixed Use File Name : Full Day Count Location: Deerfield & Carlisle/Heather Site Code : 15033 Weather: Dry Start Date : 3/26/2015 Counted by: V3 Page No : 2

HEATHER ROAD DEERFIELD ROAD DEERFIELD ROAD CARLISLE AVENUE Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound App. App. App. App. Int. Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Total Total Total Total Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM 08:00 AM 13 0 5 1 2 0 8 0 193 6 0 199 4 191 1 0 196 425 08:15 AM 13 3 980 24 22 3 1 3 0 7 4 194 4 0 202 4 166 2 0 172 405 08:30 AM 16 0 2 0 18 4 0 1 0 5 2 267 4 0 273 2 216 1 0 219 515 08:45 AM 12 0 9 0 21 13 0 3 0 16 1 278 4 0 283 2 221 3 0 226 546 Total Volume 54 3 28 0 85 25 2 9 0 36 7 932 18 0 957 12 794 7 0 813 1891 % App. Total 63.5 3.5 32.9 0 69.4 5.6 25 0 0.7 97.4 1.9 0 1.5 97.7 0.9 0 PHF .844 .250 .778 .000 .885 .481 .500 .750 .000 .563 .438 .838 .750 .000 .845 .750 .898 .583 .000 .899 .866

Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 7 0 9 0 16 3 0 3 0 6 3 241 10 0 254 6 271 1 0 278 554 05:00 PM 12 0 6 0 18 2 0 1 0 3 2 239 10 0 251 13 287 3 0 303 575 05:15 PM 11 0 6 0 17 3 1 4 0 8 3 272 7 0 282 13 306 5 0 324 631 05:30 PM 7 0 8 0 15 3 0 2 0 5 2 259 12 0 273 6 227 5 0 238 531 Total Volume 37 0 29 0 66 11 1 10 0 22 10 1011 39 0 1060 38 1091 14 0 1143 2291 % App. Total 56.1 0 43.9 0 50 4.5 45.5 0 0.9 95.4 3.7 0 3.3 95.5 1.2 0 PHF .771 .000 .806 .000 .917 .917 .250 .625 .000 .688 .833 .929 .813 .000 .940 .731 .891 .700 .000 .882 .908 Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

APPENDIX B

CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS EXISTING

- 19 -

Existing Traffic Volume Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 7 932 18 12 794 7 54 3 28 25 2 9 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 120 0 60 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 75 25 100 25 50 25 60 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.997 0.999 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.955 0.956 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3529 0 1770 3536 0 0 1779 1583 0 1781 1583 Flt Permitted 0.221 0.148 0.769 0.807 Satd. Flow (perm) 412 3529 0 276 3536 0 0 1432 1583 0 1503 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 1 29 9 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1092 327 743 967 Travel Time (s) 24.8 7.4 16.9 22.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 981 19 13 836 7 57 3 29 26 2 9 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 1000 0 13 843 0 0 60 29 0 28 9 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.0 8.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 50.0 0.0 12.0 50.0 0.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 38.6 34.9 38.7 35.0 41.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.39 0.43 0.39 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.73 0.06 0.61 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.01 Control Delay 10.4 26.4 11.1 23.6 18.5 8.2 18.4 11.4

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1 Existing Traffic Volume Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.4 26.4 11.1 23.6 18.5 8.2 18.4 11.4 LOS BC BC BA BB Approach Delay 26.3 23.4 15.1 16.7 Approach LOS C C B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 247 4 197 18 0 8 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 274 10 220 56 20 32 11 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1012 247 663 887 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 307 1727 261 1729 655 739 687 728 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.58 0.05 0.49 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.01 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.73 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 2 Existing Traffic Volume Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour 2: Deerfield Rd & Zion Driveway 4/8/2015

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 2 983 810 0 2 3 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 1035 853 0 2 3 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) 327 pX, platoon unblocked 0.81 vC, conflicting volume 853 1374 426 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 853 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 522 vCu, unblocked vol 853 991 426 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 99 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 782 358 577 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 2 517 517 568 284 5 Volume Left 2 0 0 0 0 2 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 3 cSH 782 1700 1700 1700 1700 464 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.17 0.01 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 1 Control Delay (s) 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.9 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 12.9 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1 Existing Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 10 1011 39 38 1091 14 37 0 29 11 1 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 120 0 60 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 75 25 100 25 50 25 60 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.994 0.998 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.956 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3518 0 1770 3532 0 0 1770 1583 0 1781 1583 Flt Permitted 0.149 0.133 0.749 0.849 Satd. Flow (perm) 278 3518 0 248 3532 0 0 1395 1583 0 1581 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 6 2 31 11 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1092 327 743 967 Travel Time (s) 24.8 7.4 16.9 22.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 1064 41 40 1148 15 39 0 31 12 1 11 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 1105 0 40 1163 0 0 39 31 0 13 11 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.0 8.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 50.0 0.0 12.0 50.0 0.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 44.5 38.5 46.7 42.8 33.3 33.3 33.3 33.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.43 0.52 0.48 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.73 0.17 0.69 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.02 Control Delay 7.1 24.2 9.2 20.4 24.1 9.6 24.2 13.5

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1 Existing Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.1 24.2 9.2 20.4 24.1 9.6 24.2 13.5 LOS AC AC CA CB Approach Delay 24.0 20.1 17.7 19.3 Approach LOS C C B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 267 9 226 15 0 5 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 292 18 305 43 22 20 13 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1012 247 663 887 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 283 1733 273 1839 516 606 585 593 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.64 0.15 0.63 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.02 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.73 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 2 Existing Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour 2: Deerfield Rd & Zion Driveway 4/8/2015

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 3 1048 1138 6 8 5 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 1103 1198 6 8 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) 327 pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 vC, conflicting volume 1204 1759 602 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1201 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 558 vCu, unblocked vol 1204 1442 602 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 96 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 575 237 443 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 3 552 552 799 406 14 Volume Left 3 0 0 0 0 8 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 6 5 cSH 575 1700 1700 1700 1700 288 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.47 0.24 0.05 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 4 Control Delay (s) 11.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.1 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 18.1 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1 Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

APPENDIX C

CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 2020 BACKGROUND

- 20 -

2020 Background Traffic Volume Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 7 979 19 13 834 7 57 3 29 26 2 9 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 120 0 60 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 75 25 100 25 50 25 60 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.997 0.999 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.955 0.956 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3529 0 1770 3536 0 0 1779 1583 0 1781 1583 Flt Permitted 0.210 0.138 0.763 0.801 Satd. Flow (perm) 391 3529 0 257 3536 0 0 1421 1583 0 1492 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 1 31 9 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1092 327 743 967 Travel Time (s) 24.8 7.4 16.9 22.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 1031 20 14 878 7 60 3 31 27 2 9 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 1051 0 14 885 0 0 63 31 0 29 9 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.0 8.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 50.0 0.0 12.0 50.0 0.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 40.0 36.3 40.1 36.3 39.8 39.8 39.8 39.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.40 0.45 0.40 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.74 0.07 0.62 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.01 Control Delay 9.9 25.8 10.7 22.8 19.3 8.2 19.1 12.0

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1 2020 Background Traffic Volume Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.9 25.8 10.7 22.8 19.3 8.2 19.1 12.0 LOS AC BC BA BB Approach Delay 25.7 22.7 15.6 17.5 Approach LOS C C B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 259 4 204 19 0 9 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 285 10 226 60 21 34 11 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1012 247 663 887 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 306 1727 259 1729 628 717 660 705 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.61 0.05 0.51 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.01 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 2 2020 Background Traffic Volume Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour 2: Deerfield Rd & Zion Driveway 4/8/2015

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 2 1032 851 0 2 3 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 2 1086 896 0 2 3 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) 327 pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 vC, conflicting volume 896 1443 448 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 896 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 547 vCu, unblocked vol 896 1052 448 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 99 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 753 340 558 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 2 543 543 597 299 5 Volume Left 2 0 0 0 0 2 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 3 cSH 753 1700 1700 1700 1700 444 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.35 0.18 0.01 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 1 Control Delay (s) 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.2 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 13.2 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1 2020 Background Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 11 1062 41 40 1146 15 39 0 30 12 1 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 120 0 60 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 75 25 100 25 50 25 60 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.994 0.998 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.956 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3518 0 1770 3532 0 0 1770 1583 0 1781 1583 Flt Permitted 0.136 0.122 0.748 0.841 Satd. Flow (perm) 253 3518 0 227 3532 0 0 1393 1583 0 1567 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 6 2 32 12 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1092 327 743 967 Travel Time (s) 24.8 7.4 16.9 22.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 12 1118 43 42 1206 16 41 0 32 13 1 12 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 1161 0 42 1222 0 0 41 32 0 14 12 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.0 8.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 50.0 0.0 12.0 50.0 0.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 45.8 39.8 48.0 44.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.44 0.53 0.49 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.75 0.18 0.71 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.02 Control Delay 6.9 23.8 9.0 20.1 24.6 9.8 24.5 13.5

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1 2020 Background Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.9 23.8 9.0 20.1 24.6 9.8 24.5 13.5 LOS AC AC CA CB Approach Delay 23.6 19.8 18.1 19.4 Approach LOS C B B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 280 10 235 16 0 5 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 313 18 329 45 22 21 14 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1012 247 663 887 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 276 1733 267 1859 496 584 558 571 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.67 0.16 0.66 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.02 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 2 2020 Background Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour 2: Deerfield Rd & Zion Driveway 4/8/2015

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 3 1101 1196 6 8 5 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 3 1159 1259 6 8 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) 327 pX, platoon unblocked 0.79 vC, conflicting volume 1265 1848 633 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1262 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 586 vCu, unblocked vol 1265 1537 633 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 96 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 545 220 423 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 3 579 579 839 426 14 Volume Left 3 0 0 0 0 8 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 6 5 cSH 545 1700 1700 1700 1700 269 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.49 0.25 0.05 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 4 Control Delay (s) 11.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.1 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 19.1 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1 Traffic Impact Study – Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

APPENDIX D

CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 2020 FUTURE WITH PROJECT

- 21 -

2020 Future with Project Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 7 982 19 13 844 7 57 3 29 26 2 9 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 120 0 60 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 75 25 100 25 50 25 60 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.997 0.999 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.955 0.956 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3529 0 1770 3536 0 0 1779 1583 0 1781 1583 Flt Permitted 0.205 0.137 0.763 0.801 Satd. Flow (perm) 382 3529 0 255 3536 0 0 1421 1583 0 1492 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 1 31 9 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1092 327 743 967 Travel Time (s) 24.8 7.4 16.9 22.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 1034 20 14 888 7 60 3 31 27 2 9 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 1054 0 14 895 0 0 63 31 0 29 9 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.0 8.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 50.0 0.0 12.0 50.0 0.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 40.0 36.3 40.2 36.4 39.7 39.7 39.7 39.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.40 0.45 0.40 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.74 0.07 0.63 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.01 Control Delay 9.9 25.7 10.7 22.9 19.4 8.2 19.2 12.0

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1 2020 Future with Project Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.9 25.7 10.7 22.9 19.4 8.2 19.2 12.0 LOS AC BC BA BB Approach Delay 25.6 22.7 15.7 17.5 Approach LOS C C B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 259 4 207 20 0 9 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 285 10 228 60 21 34 11 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1012 247 663 887 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 303 1727 258 1729 627 716 658 703 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.61 0.05 0.52 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.01 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 2 2020 Future with Project Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: AM Peak Hour 2: Deerfield Rd & Zion Driveway 4/8/2015

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 5 1032 851 2 11 13 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 1086 896 2 12 14 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 327 pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 vC, conflicting volume 898 1451 449 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 898 1067 449 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 93 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 752 173 557 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 5 543 543 597 301 25 Volume Left 5 0 0 0 0 12 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 2 14 cSH 752 1700 1700 1700 1700 276 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.35 0.18 0.09 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 0 7 Control Delay (s) 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 Lane LOS A C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 19.4 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1 2020 Future with Project Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 11 1072 41 40 1151 15 39 0 30 12 1 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 100 0 120 0 60 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 75 25 100 25 50 25 60 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.994 0.998 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.956 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3518 0 1770 3532 0 0 1770 1583 0 1781 1583 Flt Permitted 0.136 0.121 0.748 0.841 Satd. Flow (perm) 253 3518 0 225 3532 0 0 1393 1583 0 1567 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 6 2 32 12 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1092 327 743 967 Travel Time (s) 24.8 7.4 16.9 22.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 12 1128 43 42 1212 16 41 0 32 13 1 12 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 1171 0 42 1228 0 0 41 32 0 14 12 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.0 8.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 50.0 0.0 12.0 50.0 0.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 13.3% 55.6% 0.0% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% 31.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 46.1 40.0 48.2 44.3 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.44 0.54 0.49 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.75 0.18 0.71 0.08 0.06 0.03 0.02 Control Delay 6.9 23.7 8.9 20.0 24.8 9.8 24.7 13.5

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1 2020 Future with Project Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd 4/9/2015

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.9 23.7 8.9 20.0 24.8 9.8 24.7 13.5 LOS AC AB CA CB Approach Delay 23.5 19.6 18.2 19.5 Approach LOS C B B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 279 9 232 16 0 6 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 317 18 332 45 22 21 14 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1012 247 663 887 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 277 1733 267 1866 492 580 554 567 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.68 0.16 0.66 0.08 0.06 0.03 0.02 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Splits and Phases: 1: Deerfield Rd & Heather Rd

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 2 2020 Future with Project Traffic Volumes Timing Plan: PM Peak Hour 2: Deerfield Rd & Zion Driveway 4/8/2015

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 13 1101 1195 15 13 11 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 1159 1258 16 14 12 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) 327 pX, platoon unblocked 0.79 vC, conflicting volume 1274 1873 637 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1266 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 607 vCu, unblocked vol 1274 1565 637 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 94 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 541 218 420 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 14 579 579 839 435 25 Volume Left 14 0 0 0 0 14 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 16 12 cSH 541 1700 1700 1700 1700 280 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.49 0.26 0.09 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 0 7 Control Delay (s) 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.1 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 19.1 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15

Synchro 7 - Report V3 Co Page 1

PARKING ASSESSMENT

DATE: April 17, 2015

TO: Dawni Freeman, Brinshore Development, LLC

FROM: Peter Reinhofer, P.E.

RE: Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Deerfield, Illinois

Brinshore Development, LLC is planning to develop the currently vacant portion of the Zion Lutheran Church property located at 10 Deerfield Road, east of Heather Road in Deerfield, Illinois. The property currently contains multiple buildings owned by Zion Lutheran Church and approximately eight acres of undeveloped land. The property is bounded by Deerfield Road to the south, the North Branch Chicago River to the east, and private homes to the north and west. The site is accessed through a two lane driveway on Deerfield Road.

The capacity of the church sanctuary is 264 people per the fire code. The planned development will consist of 48 affordable housing apartment units located north of the existing church. The current site plan calls for 12 one-bedroom units, 24 two-bedroom units, and 12 three-bedroom units.

This Parking Assessment Memorandum has been prepared to address the number of parking spaces for the church and apartment land uses within the mixed use development. The objective of this parking analysis is to determine if the proposed number of designated parking spaces is adequate to serve the parking demand of the site. For this assessment, parking requirements were calculated based on parking rates in the Village of Deerfield’s Zoning Ordinance.

Parking Requirements per Village of Deerfield

Typically, parking for a site is determined using parking ratios found in a zoning ordinance. The Village of Deerfield’s Zoning Ordinance, Article 8 (Off Street Parking and Loading) provides a schedule of off-street parking ratios to determine the required number of parking spaces corresponding to its specified land use. Table 1 provides a summary of the required parking spaces for various land uses in the Village.

V3 COMPANIES • 7325 JANES AVENUE, WOODRIDGE, IL 60517 • PH: 630.724.9200 • FX: 630.724.9202 • V3CO.COM VISIO, VERTERE, VIRTUTE … THE VISION TO TRANSFORM WITH EXCELLENCE Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Parking Assessment Page 2 of 4 April 17, 2015

Table 1: Village of Deerfield Off Street Parking Requirements

Land Use Required Parking Residential Uses – Multiple-Family Efficiency and one-bedroom units – one and one-half (1.5) Dwellings parking spaces for each dwelling unit Two or more bedroom units – two (2) parking spaces for each dwelling unit Places of Worship One (1) parking space shall be provided for each four (4) seats. If fixed seating is not used, then one (1) parking space shall be provided for each four (4) persons of the total capacity as determined by the Municipal Code. Data from Deerfield Zoning Ordinance, Article 8

Utilizing the rates in Table 1, the required number of parking spaces can be calculated for the Zion Lutheran Mixed Use development. Table 2 provides a summary of the required parking spaces for the mixed use development.

Table 2 – Required Parking Spaces per Village Ordinance

# of Land Use Independent Variable Parking Supply Ratio Parking Spaces 12 1 Bedroom units 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit 18 Multiple-Family 24 2 Bedroom units 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit 48 Dwellings 12 3 Bedroom Units 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit 24

Places of 1 parking space per 4 persons of the total 264 People 66 Worship capacity

TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING SPACES PER VILLAGE ORDINANCE 156

Based on the Zoning Ordinance, Zion Lutheran Mixed Use would have to provide 156 off street parking spaces. The residential portion of the site would have to provide 90 parking spaces while the church portion would have to provide 66 parking spaces. Therefore, the site will provide 156 parking spaces to be shared between the proposed apartments and the existing church.

In 2013, Tracy Cross and Associates, Inc. conducted a real estate market analysis for another proposed apartment complex in Deerfield. As part of that analysis, they examined parking

Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Parking Assessment Page 3 of 4 April 17, 2015 conditions at a variety of existing and proposed apartment complexes in Deerfield and adjacent municipalities, including the number of apartments and the number of parking spaces. Parking ratios were then developed for each of the properties. Table 3 provides a summary of the parking conditions for the selected apartment communities.

Table 3 – Parking Ratios for Selected Apartment Communities, Deerfield Area

Number of Number of Development Name Location Apartment Parking Ratio Units Spaces Zion Lutheran Mixed Use (proposed) Deerfield 48 90 1.88:1.0 Parkway North Center (proposed) Deerfield 254 390 1.54:1.0 Deerfield Village Center (existing) Deerfield 56 59 1.05:1.0 Amli-Deerfield (proposed) Deerfield 240 421 1.75:1.0 Aloft at the Glen (existing) Glenview 181 190 1.05:1.0 Glen Star-Lennar (proposed) Glenview 290 509 1.76:1.0 Midtown Square-Trammel Crow (proposed) Glenview 125 170 1.36:1.0 Avon-Focus (proposed) Glenview 238 351 1.47:1.0 Renaissance Place (existing) Highland Park 30 32 1.05:1.0 Average (Excluding Zion Lutheran Mixed Use) 177 265 1.50:1.0 Source: Tracy Cross and Associates, Inc.

As illustrated in Table 3, the Zion Lutheran Mixed Use will provide a parking ratio of 1.88 to 1.0, which is higher than the market average and all of the other apartment complexes.

Additionally, as part of the 2013 real estate market analysis, Tracy Cross and Associates, Inc. calculated the number of vehicles per renter household based upon a standard person-per- household formula. Table 4 illustrates the calculation to determine the average vehicles per renter household.

Table 4 – Parking Requirements Based Upon Estimated Persons Per Unit

Estimated Persons (16 or Percentage of Units at Calculated Vehicles Unit Type older) per Household (1) Zion Lutheran Mixed Use per Renter Household One Bedroom 1.10 25% Two Bedroom 1.80 50% 1.68 Three Bedroom 2.00 25% Source: Tracy Cross and Associates, Inc.

Zion Lutheran Mixed Use Parking Assessment Page 4 of 4 April 17, 2015

(1) Reflects an estimate that 10.0 percent of all one bedroom households will contain two persons 16 years of age or older and the remainder will contain just one person; 20.0 percent of two bedroom units will contain just one person of driving age and 80.0 percent will have two persons; and 100.0 percent of three bedroom units will contain two drivers.

As calculated in Table 4 utilizing standard person-per-household formula, the projected parking demand is 1.68 parking spaces per unit. Compared to the 1.88 parking spaces per unit being provided, the development will provide ample parking residents and additional parking for guests.

Based on meeting the Village Ordinance Code for off street parking and the Tracy Cross and Associates, Inc. real estate market analysis for another Deerfield apartment complex, it is our professional opinion that the proposed 156 parking spaces will accommodate the parking demand for the mixed use development.

Developer

Brinshore EXISTING SITE SURVEY IS PRODUCED ON THIS SHEET FROM THE ORIGINAL SURVEY. THE SURVEY IS NOT THE WORK OF ECKENHOFF SAUNDERS ARCHITECTS AND REPRODUCED FOR Civil Engineer CONVENIENCE AND INFORMATION ONLY. ECKENHOFF SAUNDERS ARCHITECTS DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OF COMPLETENESS OF THE SURVEY. V3 Companies

Landscape Architect PUBLIC OVERLOOK Rosborough Partners, Inc.

W/ INTERACTIVE Structural Engineeer

LEARNING KIOSK Virgilio & Associates, Ltd.

ILLUMINATED SIGN - MEPFP Engineer RTM FIRE TRUCK TURNING RADIUS ZION WOODS PARKING ZION: 66 (INCLUDES 5 ADA) LINE OF EXISTING SEWER BIKE STORAGE / OFFICE NATURAL PLANTINGS RESIDENTS: 93 (INCLUDES 5 ADA) TOTAL= 159 (INCLUDES 10 ADA) NATURAL PLANTINGS STAMPED ASPHALT TRASH ENCLOSURE CROSSWALK

HIGHLAND

LINE PARK TREE

STORMWATER DETENTION FACILITY

5

1

T

'

9

-

Y

'

FF=656.7 - 6

P NE 2'-0" ABOVE

" LI 6 E FLOOD PLAIN . TRE " Key Plan 56.9 =6 OVE FF '-0" AB 2 LAIN 2

P 6 FLOOD

T

4

3

Y

'

'

-

-

P

0

0

.

" 7.1 " 65 E = BOV F '0" A AIN F 2' PL 1 OD O T FL 9

Y

'

-

P

6

R . " 40'

COMPENSATORY - 6" ZION STORAGE FACILITY LUTHERAN

84' - 6" CHURCH

39' - 6" 69' - 0" TREE 13' - 0" LINE TREE LINE 31' - 0" 3 05-04-2015 Issue for Prefiling Submission 2 04-22-2015 Preliminary Submission 1 03-27-2015 Application 52' - 0" No. Date Issue Description 33' - 6" 79' - 0" 31' - 0" 18' - 6" 14' - 6" 48' - 0" 14' - 0" 50' - 0" 139' - 6" 60' - 6" 97' - 0" 91' - 0" 55' - 6" 64' - 6" 66' - 0" 129' - 6" 79' - 0" 77' - 0" 74' - 6" 61' - 6" 985 835 935 905 965 915 805 855 115

885 C 2014 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects, Inc

HEATHER ROAD

RESIDENT GARDEN EXISTING DRIVE Client / Project Name Zion Woods TRASH ENCLOSURE LANDSCAPE BUFFER EXISTING PARKING AREA Multi-Family Housing PLAY / PICNIC EXISTING CHURCH SIGN - Zion Multi-Family Housing (mparrucci).rvt 10 Deerfield Road, Deerfield, IL RELOCATED FIREPIT Sheet Title Site Plan 1 1" = 40'-0" Site Plan

QAQC 5/4/2015 10:13:03 AM 10:13:03 5/4/2015 C:\Users\mparrucci\Desktop\14139LOCAL\14139 Zion Project No. 14139 AS1.0 DATE: FILE: Developer

Brinshore

Civil Engineer

V3 Companies

Landscape Architect

Rosborough Partners, Inc.

Structural Engineeer

Virgilio & Associates, Ltd. IVER AGO R IVER CHIC MEPFP Engineer AGO R ANCH CHIC H BR RTM NCH NORT H BRA THE NORT RK OF HIGHLAND PARK THE HIGHLAND PARK E FO K OF MIDDL E FOR MIDDL

Existing Conditions PROPERTY LINES Site Floodzones PROPERTY LINES 1 1" = 80'-0" CHICAGO RIVER 2 1" = 80'-0" CHICAGO RIVER Key Plan FLOODWAY FLOODWAY 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN 500 YEAR FLOODPLAIN 500 YEAR FLOODPLAIN

ON-SITE AREA OF RAINFALL DETENTION WITH CONTROLLED RELEASE INTO STORM SEWER. SIZE BASED ON TOTAL DISTURBED AREA OF SITE

IVER AGO R R CHIC RIVE ANCH ICAGO TH BR H CH NOR RANC F THE RTH B K O NO 3 05-04-2015 Issue for Prefiling Submission HIGHLAND PARK E FOR F THE DDL HIGHLAND PARK K O No. Date Issue Description MI E FOR MIDDL STORMWATER DETENTION FACILITY

EXISTING IMPERVIOUS

SURFACE C 2014 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects, Inc NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COMPENSATORY STORAGE FACILITY

Client / Project Name Zion Woods

ON-SITE AREA OF COMPENSATION FOR FILL OUTLET RESTRICTOR SIZED Multi-Family Housing

- Zion Multi-Family Housing (mparrucci).rvt WITHIN THE EXISTING FLOODPLAIN ACCORDING TO NEW IMPERVIOUS PROPERTY LINES SURFACE AREA OF SITE 10 Deerfield Road, Deerfield, IL CHICAGO RIVER Impervious Surfaces Storm Water Management Sheet Title 3 1" = 80'-0" FLOODWAY 4 1" = 80'-0" Storm Water 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN Management 500 YEAR FLOODPLAIN

NOTE: 1. FLOOD ZONES BASED ON THE FEMA FLOOD QAQC INSURANCE RATE MAP #17097C0287K DATED Checker 5/4/2015 10:13:12 AM 10:13:12 5/4/2015 C:\Users\mparrucci\Desktop\14139LOCAL\14139 Zion SEPTEMBER 18, 2013. Project No. 14139 AS1.1 DATE: FILE: DATE: 5/4/2015 10:13:18 AM FILE: C:\Users\mparrucci\Desktop\14139 Zion LOCAL\14139 - Zion Multi-Family Housing (mparrucci).rvt CAST STONE BASE STONE CAST 1 CAST STONE CAP CAST STONE BRICK MASONRY- 1" = 1'-0" Illuminated Sign Elevation WOODS LOGO METAL ZION CLAD PIER

3' - 8" 7' -4" 27 SQFT. RECTANGLE 27 SQFT. LINEINDICATES DASHED FINISH BEAM WITHSTAINED SIGNAGE WOOD-CLAD METAL LETTERING Multi-Family Housing Zion Woods C RTM Engineer MEPFP Virgilio &Associates, Ltd. Structural Engineeer Rosborough Partners,Inc. Architect Landscape V3 Companies Engineer Civil Brinshore Developer Project No. Project QAQC 10 Deerfield Road, Key Plan 14139 Checker Exterior Signage Sheet Title Client /ProjectName 2014 No. Date Issue Description Issue Date No. 3 05-04-2015 Issue for Prefiling Submission Prefiling for Issue 05-04-2015 3 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects, Inc Architects, Saunders Eckenhoff Deerfield,IL AS1.2 Developer

PLAN LEGEND Brinshore

Civil Engineer

V3 Companies

Landscape Architect

169' - 5" Rosborough Partners, Inc. 2' - 6" PLAN NOTES 31' - 7" 27' - 1" 23' - 3" 31' - 8" 27' - 1" 26' - 3" 1.AT LEAST 10% OF THE TOTAL UNITS IN THE PROJECT ARE Structural Engineeer 1' - 2" 1' - 1" DESIGNED FOR PERSONS WITH MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTS, AS DEFINED IN ICC/ANSI 117.1-2003 SECTION 1002 ACCESSIBLE Virgilio & Associates, Ltd. UNITS; AND AT LEAST 2% OF THE TOTAL UNITS IN THE PROJECT ARE DESIGNED FOR PERSONS WITH SENSORY IMPAIRMENTS, AS 1' - 0" 3' - 0"

1' - 0" DEFINED IN ICC/ANSI 117.1-2003 SECTION 1005 SENSORY IMPAIRED UNITS. MEPFP Engineer 1' - 0" 1' - 2" 1' - 1" 2. 100% OF THE UNITS WILL ACHIEVE 50 POINTS UNDER THE RTM UNIVERSAL DESIGN CHECKLIST. 2% OF THE UNITS WILL BE CLOSET TYPE-A ADAPTABLE. FIRST FLOOR UNITS NOT TYPE-A OR CLOSET 11 SF 11 SF ACCESSBLE WILL BE TYPE-B ADAPTABLE. BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM LIVING/DINING LIVING/DINING 8' - 4" 126 SF 100 SF 100 SF 105 SF 110 SF 227 SF 228 SF 3. UNIVERSAL DESIGN PRINCIPALS TYPICAL TO ALL UNIT TYPES. 1' - 0" CLOSET CLOSET DESIGANATION SHOWN ON ONE UNIT ONLY BUT APPLICABLE TO 12 SF 12 SF ALL.

4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH IHDA 13.15, EVERY DWELLING UNIT IN BUILDINGS SERVED BY NATURAL GAS SHALL BE EQUIPED WITH CLOSET CLOSET CLOSET STORAGE AT LEAST ONE APPROVED CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM IN AN 11 SF 11 SF LIVING/DINING LIVING/DINING 11 SF 16 SF BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM OPERATING CONDITION WITHIN 15 FEET OF EVERY ROOM USED 227 SF 226 SF 125 SF 100 SF 100 SF 104 SF 127 SF FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM DETECTOR ACT (PUBLIC ACT 094- CLOSET CLOSET 12 SF 12 SF 0741). ADA BATHROOM UTLITY BATHROOM ADA BATHROOM KITCHEN KITCHEN BATHROOM 45 SF UTLITY 53 SF 45 SF 5. IN ACCORDANCE WITH IHDA 13.16, EVERY UNIT AT A MINIMUM 67 SF 137 SF 113 SF 67 SF 79 SF SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AT LEAST ONE APPROVED SMOKE CLOSET STORAGE DETECTOR IN A OPERATING CONDITION WITHIN 15 FEET OF 11 SF SF 12 16 SF STORAGE EVERY ROOM FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SMOKE DETECTOR ACT (PUBLIC ACT 425 49' - 4" ILCS 60/). UTLITY ADA 51 SF ADA BATHROOM ADA BATHROOM BATHROOM ADA BATHROOM BATHROOM KITCHEN KITCHEN 45 SF KITCHEN BATHROOM 45 SF UTILITY UTLITY 45 SF BATHROOM UTLITY 71 SF 61 SF 137 SF 113 SF KITCHEN 103 SF 67 SF 79 SF 62 SF 67 SF 86 SF 109 SF

12 SF 12 9' - 0" STORAGE CLOSET 7 SF 49' - 4" 47' - 4" STOR. 16 SF UTLITY CLOSET STORAGE 51 SF 23 SF 6 SF UTLITY ADA 9' - 11"

CLOSET SF 12 ADA BATHROOM BATHROOM 13 SF BATHROOM 45 SF 72 SF STORAGE KITCHEN 61 SF 67 SF 103 SF BEDROOM 21' - 8" LIVING/DINING CLOSET 129 SF 248 SF BEDROOM 5 SF 9' - 0" LIVING/DINING 111 SF BEDROOM BEDROOM 281 SF CLOSET

7 SF 107 SF 100 SF 16 SF STORAGE CLOSET 6' - 7" 7 SF 1' - 0"

21' - 8" LIVING/DINING 248 SF BEDROOM LIVING/DINING 111 SF BEDROOM KITCHEN 274 SF 111 SF 107 SF 8' - 4"

CLOSET 6' - 7" 9' - 11" 11 SF 32' - 2" 3' - 0" 4"

31' - 9" 1' - 0" 39' - 10"

1' - 0" 5" 1' - 0" 40' - 9"

2' - 6" Key Plan

Building 1 Level 2 2 1/8" = 1'-0"

193' - 1" 2' - 6" 31' - 7" 26' - 10" 23' - 6" 31' - 8" 27' - 0" 23' - 4" 26' - 8"

1' - 0" 1' - 0" 1' - 0"

3' - 0" 1' - 0"

3 05-04-2015 Issue for Prefiling Submission 1' - 2" 11" 1' - 0" 1 03-27-2015 Application CLOSET No. Date Issue Description CLOSET 11 SF 5' - 10" 11 SF BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM LIVING/DINING LIVING/DINING 125 SF 99 SF 99 SF 105 SF 110 SF 227 SF 228 SF CLOSET CLOSET 12 SF 12 SF 1' - 0"

CLOSET CLOSET CLOSET STORAGE 11 SF 11 SF LIVING/DINING LIVING/DINING 11 SF 16 SF BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM 227 SF 226 SF 100 SF 100 SF 104 SF 127 SF MAINTENANCE CLOSET CLOSET STORAGE 12 SF 12 SF 250 SF ADA BATHROOM UTLITY BATHROOM ADA BATHROOM KITCHEN KITCHEN BATHROOM 45 SF UTLITY 53 SF 45 SF C 2014 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects, Inc 67 SF 137 SF 113 SF 67 SF 79 SF CLOSET STORAGE 12 SF SF 12

16 SF STORAGE 49' - 4"

UTLITY MANGER'S ADA 51 SF ADA OFFICE BATHROOM ADA BATHROOM BATHROOM ADA BATHROOM BATHROOM KITCHEN KITCHEN 45 SF KITCHEN 101 SF BATHROOM 45 SF UTILITY 45 SF BATHROOM UTLITY 71 SF 61 SF BATHROOM 113 SF UTLITY 66' - 0" 137 SF KITCHEN 103 SF 69 SF 79 SF 62 SF 67 SF 86 SF 109 SF

12 SF 12 9' - 0" STORAGE CLOSET 7 SF STOR. 16 SF UTLITY CLOSET STORAGE 6 SF UTLITY 51 SF ADA 23 SF ADMIN AREA

CLOSET SF 12 ADA BATHROOM BATHROOM 21' - 8" 13 SF BATHROOM 45 SF 72 SF STORAGE KITCHEN 61 SF 67 SF BEDROOM LIVING/DINING CLOSET 16' - 7" 132 SF 248 SF BEDROOM 5 SF 9' - 0" LIVING/DINING 111 SF CLOSET BEDROOM BEDROOM 7 SF 16 SF 111 SF 103 SF

STORAGE 14' - 9" CLOSET 8 SF 6' - 0" 9' - 1" 27' - 5" 21' - 8"

Client / Project Name LIVING/DINING 16' - 7" BEDROOM 22' - 10" 1' - 0"

1' - 2" Zion Woods LIVING/DINING 111 SF BEDROOM KITCHEN 274 SF 113 SF 109 SF

CLOSET 9' - 4" 11 SF 4' - 0" Multi-Family Housing 32' - 2" 3' - 0"

1' - 0" 47' - 4" 1' - 0" 4" 1' - 2" - Zion Multi-Family Housing (mparrucci).rvt 10 Deerfield Road, Deerfield, IL

Sheet Title 22' - 4" 18' - 8" Floor Plans 2' - 7" Building 1 Level 1 1 1/8" = 1'-0"

QAQC 5/4/2015 10:12:25 AM 10:12:25 5/4/2015 C:\Users\mparrucci\Desktop\14139LOCAL\14139 Zion Project No. 14139 A1.0 DATE: FILE: Developer

PLAN LEGEND Brinshore

Civil Engineer

V3 Companies

Landscape Architect UNIT 2A PLAN NOTES Rosborough Partners, Inc. UNIT 3 925 SF 1125 SF 2 BEDROOM 1.AT LEAST 10% OF THE TOTAL UNITS IN THE PROJECT ARE Structural Engineeer 3 BEDROOM 2 BATHROOM DESIGNED FOR PERSONS WITH MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTS, AS 2 BATHROOM DEFINED IN ICC/ANSI 117.1-2003 SECTION 1002 ACCESSIBLE NON-ACCESSIBLE UNITS; AND AT LEAST 2% OF THE TOTAL UNITS IN THE PROJECT Virgilio & Associates, Ltd. NON-ACCESSIBLE ARE DESIGNED FOR PERSONS WITH SENSORY IMPAIRMENTS, AS UNIT 2B DEFINED IN ICC/ANSI 117.1-2003 SECTION 1005 SENSORY UNIT 3 960 SF IMPAIRED UNITS. MEPFP Engineer 1125 SF 2 BEDROOM 2. 100% OF THE UNITS WILL ACHIEVE 50 POINTS UNDER THE RTM 3 BEDROOM 2 BATHROOM UNIVERSAL DESIGN CHECKLIST. 2% OF THE UNITS WILL BE NON-ACCESSIBLE TYPE-A ADAPTABLE. FIRST FLOOR UNITS NOT TYPE-A OR 2 BATHROOM ACCESSBLE WILL BE TYPE-B ADAPTABLE. NON-ACCESSIBLE 3. UNIVERSAL DESIGN PRINCIPALS TYPICAL TO ALL UNIT TYPES. DESIGANATION SHOWN ON ONE UNIT ONLY BUT APPLICABLE TO ALL. UNIT 2C 4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH IHDA 13.15, EVERY DWELLING UNIT IN UNIT 1 BUILDINGS SERVED BY NATURAL GAS SHALL BE EQUIPED WITH 950 SF AT LEAST ONE APPROVED CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM IN AN 680 SF OPERATING CONDITION WITHIN 15 FEET OF EVERY ROOM USED 2 BEDROOM FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 2 BATHROOM 1 BEDROOM THE CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM DETECTOR ACT (PUBLIC ACT 094- 1 BATHROOM 0741).

NON-ACCESSIBLE NON-ACCESSIBLE 5. IN ACCORDANCE WITH IHDA 13.16, EVERY UNIT AT A MINIMUM UNIT 2D SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AT LEAST ONE APPROVED SMOKE UNIT 1 DETECTOR IN A OPERATING CONDITION WITHIN 15 FEET OF 930 SF 680 SF EVERY ROOM FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES AND MEET THE 2 BEDROOM REQUIREMENTS OF THE SMOKE DETECTOR ACT (PUBLIC ACT 425 1 BEDROOM ILCS 60/). 2 BATHROOM 1 BATHROOM

NON-ACCESSIBLE NON-ACCESSIBLE

Keyplan - Building 1 Level 2 2 1/8" = 1'-0"

UNIT 2A UNIT 3 925 SF

1125 SF 2 BEDROOM Key Plan 3 BEDROOM 2 BATHROOM 2 BATHROOM TYPE A UNIT 2B TYPE B UNIT 3 960 SF 1125 SF 2 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 2 BATHROOM 2 BATHROOM TYPE B TYPE B

UNIT 2C UNIT 1 950 SF 2 BEDROOM 680 SF 2 BATHROOM 1 BEDROOM 1 BATHROOM ACCESSIBLE TYPE B UNIT 2D UNIT 1 930 SF 680 SF 2 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 BATHROOM 1 BATHROOM TYPE B ACCESSIBLE

3 05-04-2015 Issue for Prefiling Submission 1 03-27-2015 Application No. Date Issue Description

Keyplan - Building 1 Level 1 1 1/8" = 1'-0" ACCESSIBILITY C 2014 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects, Inc QUANTITY/BLDG UNIT TYPE BLDG 1 BLDG 2 BLDG 3 ACCESSIBLE* 2 2 1 TYPE A ** 1 0 0 TYPE B *** 5 6 7 NON-ACCESS. **** 8 8 8 16 16 16 48 UNITS TOTAL

* 10% OF TOTAL UNITS TO BE ACCESSIBLE. ACCESSIBLE UNITS Client / Project Name TO BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG UNIT TYPES. UNITS TO ACHIEVE A Zion Woods MINIMUM SCORE OF 50 PER UNIVERSAL DESIGN CHECKLIST CERTFICATION. Multi-Family Housing

- Zion Multi-Family Housing (mparrucci).rvt ** 2% OF TOTAL UNITS TO BE TYPE-A PER IBC. UNITS TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM SCORE OF 50 PER UNIVERSAL DESIGN 10 Deerfield Road, Deerfield, IL CHECKLIST CERTFICATION. Sheet Title *** ALL REMAINING 1ST FLOOR UNITS TO BE TYPE-B. UNITS TO Floor Plans - Unit Types ACHIEVE A MINIMUM SCORE OF 50 PER UNIVERSAL DESIGN CHECKLIST CERTFICATION. **** ALL NON-ACCESSIBLE UNITS TO BE LOCATED ON 2ND

FLOOR. UNITS TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM SCORE OF 50 PER QAQC Checker 5/4/2015 10:12:29 AM 10:12:29 5/4/2015 C:\Users\mparrucci\Desktop\14139LOCAL\14139 Zion UNIVERSAL DESIGN CHECKLIST CERTFICATION. Project No. 14139 A1.1 DATE: FILE: Developer EXT. ELEV. LEGEND Brinshore

Civil Engineer

V3 Companies

Landscape Architect

ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF ASSEMBLY Rosborough Partners, Inc. OVER PLYWOOD AND WOOD TRUSSES, MIN. R-49 INSULATION

Roof Peak Structural Engineeer 33' - 0" EXTERIOR WALL TYPE II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING Virgilio & Associates, Ltd. OVER RIGID INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIER OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING AND WOOD STUDS, MIN. R-7.5 CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION AND R-13 MEPFP Engineer BATT INSULATION BETWEEN STUDS EXT. ELEV. NOTES RTM

Roof Eave xxxxx 20' - 0" EXTERIOR WALL TYPE I: BRICK MASONRY VENEER OVER RIGID INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIER OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING AND WOOD STUDS, MIN. R- 7.5 CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION AND R-13 BATT INSULATION BETWEEN STUDS

Level 2 10' - 0"

Grade 0" ELECTRICAL METERS HOLLOW METAL DOOR CLAD WOOD WINDOW, TYP. AND FRAME CASEMENT OPERATING WHERE SHOWN STONE SILL East Elevation 1 1/8" = 1'-0"

BOARD AND BATTEN FIBER CEMENT SYSTEM

ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF ASSEMBLY OVER PLYWOOD AND WOOD TRUSSES, MIN. R-49 INSULATION

Roof Peak Key Plan 33' - 0"

EXTERIOR WALL TYPE II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING OVER RIGID INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIER OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING AND WOOD STUDS, MIN. R-7.5 CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION AND R- 13 BATT INSULATION BETWEEN STUDS

Roof Eave 20' - 0" EXTERIOR WALL TYPE I: BRICK MASONRY VENEER OVER RIGID INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIER OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING AND WOOD STUDS, MIN. R- 7.5 CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION AND R-13 BATT INSULATION BETWEEN STUDS SHEET NOTES 0 Level 2 10' - 0"

Grade 0"

PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR, WOOD BEAM SUPPORTING DOWNSPOUT AND GUTTER, TYP. TYP. AT UNIT ENTRANCES STAIR ROOF CLAD WOOD WINDOW, TYP. FRAMED WOOD STAIR CASEMENT OPERATING WITH HANDRAIL SYSTEM WHERE SHOWN STONE SILL, TYP. 3 05-04-2015 Issue for Prefiling Submission 2 04-22-2015 Preliminary Submission West Elevation 1 03-27-2015 Application 2 1/8" = 1'-0" No. Date Issue Description

C 2014 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects, Inc

Roof Peak Roof Peak 33' - 0" 33' - 0"

EXTERIOR WALL TYPE II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING EXTERIOR WALL TYPE II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING OVER RIGID INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIER OVER OVER RIGID INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIER PLYWOOD SHEATHING AND WOOD STUDS, MIN. R-7.5 OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING AND WOOD STUDS, CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION AND R-13 BATT MIN. R-7.5 CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION AND R-13 INSULATION BETWEEN STUDS BATT INSULATION BETWEEN STUDS CLAD CLERESTORY WINDOWS CLAD WOOD CLERESTORY WINDOWS Roof Eave Roof Eave 20' - 0" 20' - 0" Client / Project Name Zion Woods ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF ASSEMBLY OVER PLYWOOD AND WOOD TRUSSES, MIN. R-49 INSULATION

Level 2 Level 2 Multi-Family Housing 10' - 0" 10' - 0" EXTERIOR WALL TYPE I: BRICK MASONRY VENEER - Zion Multi-Family Housing (mparrucci).rvt EXTERIOR WALL TYPE I: BRICK MASONRY VENEER OVER RIGID INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIER OVER OVER RIGID INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIER OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING AND WOOD STUDS, MIN. R- 10 Deerfield Road, Deerfield, IL PLYWOOD SHEATHING AND WOOD STUDS, MIN. R- 7.5 CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION AND R-13 BATT 7.5 CONTINUOUS RIGID INSULATION AND R-13 BATT INSULATION BETWEEN STUDS INSULATION BETWEEN STUDS Sheet Title Grade Grade 0" 0" Exterior Elevations ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM DOWNSPOUT AND GUTTER, TYP. DOWNSPOUT AND GUTTER, TYP.

North Elevation South Elevation 3 1/8" = 1'-0" 4 1/8" = 1'-0"

QAQC 5/4/2015 10:12:50 AM 10:12:50 5/4/2015 C:\Users\mparrucci\Desktop\14139LOCAL\14139 Zion Project No. 14139 A3.0 DATE: FILE: Developer

Brinshore

Civil Engineer

V3 Companies

Landscape Architect

Rosborough Partners, Inc.

Structural Engineeer

Virgilio & Associates, Ltd.

MEPFP Engineer

RTM

Key Plan

3 05-04-2015 Issue for Prefiling Submission 2 04-22-2015 Preliminary Submission No. Date Issue Description

C 2014 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects, Inc

Client / Project Name Zion Woods

Multi-Family Housing - Zion Multi-Family Housing (mparrucci).rvt 10 Deerfield Road, Deerfield, IL

Sheet Title Aerial

QAQC Checker 5/4/2015 10:13:19 AM 10:13:19 5/4/2015 C:\Users\mparrucci\Desktop\14139LOCAL\14139 Zion Project No. 14139 SD 1 DATE: FILE: Developer

Brinshore

Civil Engineer

V3 Companies

Landscape Architect

Rosborough Partners, Inc.

Structural Engineeer

Virgilio & Associates, Ltd.

MEPFP Engineer

RTM

Key Plan

3 05-04-2015 Issue for Prefiling Submission 2 04-22-2015 Preliminary Submission No. Date Issue Description

C 2014 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects, Inc

Client / Project Name Zion Woods

Multi-Family Housing - Zion Multi-Family Housing (mparrucci).rvt 10 Deerfield Road, Deerfield, IL

Sheet Title View from South

QAQC Checker 5/4/2015 10:13:20 AM 10:13:20 5/4/2015 C:\Users\mparrucci\Desktop\14139LOCAL\14139 Zion Project No. 14139 SD 2 DATE: FILE: Developer

Brinshore

Civil Engineer

V3 Companies

Landscape Architect

Rosborough Partners, Inc.

Structural Engineeer

Virgilio & Associates, Ltd.

MEPFP Engineer

RTM

Key Plan

3 05-04-2015 Issue for Prefiling Submission 2 04-22-2015 Preliminary Submission No. Date Issue Description

C 2014 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects, Inc

Client / Project Name Zion Woods

Multi-Family Housing - Zion Multi-Family Housing (mparrucci).rvt 10 Deerfield Road, Deerfield, IL

Sheet Title View from North

QAQC Checker 5/4/2015 10:13:21 AM 10:13:21 5/4/2015 C:\Users\mparrucci\Desktop\14139LOCAL\14139 Zion Project No. 14139 SD 3 DATE: FILE: Developer

Brinshore

Civil Engineer

V3 Companies

Landscape Architect

Rosborough Partners, Inc.

Structural Engineeer

Virgilio & Associates, Ltd.

MEPFP Engineer

RTM

Key Plan

3 05-04-2015 Issue for Prefiling Submission 2 04-22-2015 Preliminary Submission No. Date Issue Description

C 2014 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects, Inc

t

v

r

.

)

i

c

c

u

r

r

a

p

m

( Client / Project Name

g

n

i

s

u

o Zion Woods

H

y

l

i

m

a

F

-

i

t

l u Multi-Family Housing

M

n

o

i

Z

-

9

3

1 10 Deerfield Road, Deerfield, IL

4

1

\

L

A

C Sheet Title

O

L

n

o

i

Z

View from West

9

3

1

4

1

\

p

o

t

k

s

e

M

D

\

A

i

c

2

c

2

u

:

r

3

r

1

a

:

p

0

1

m

\

s QAQC

5

r

1

e

0

s

2

/ Checker

U

\

4

:

/

5 C Project No.

:

: E SD 4

E T 14139

L

A

I

D F Developer

Brinshore

Civil Engineer

V3 Companies

Landscape Architect

Rosborough Partners, Inc.

Structural Engineeer

Virgilio & Associates, Ltd.

MEPFP Engineer

RTM

Key Plan

3 05-04-2015 Issue for Prefiling Submission 2 04-22-2015 Preliminary Submission No. Date Issue Description

C 2014 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects, Inc

t

v

r

.

)

i

c

c

u

r

r

a

p

m

( Client / Project Name

g

n

i

s

u

o Zion Woods

H

y

l

i

m

a

F

-

i

t

l u Multi-Family Housing

M

n

o

i

Z

-

9

3

1 10 Deerfield Road, Deerfield, IL

4

1

\

L

A

C Sheet Title

O

L

n

o

i

Z

View from Southwest

9

3

1

4

1

\

p

o

t

k

s

e

M

D

\

A

i

c

3

c

2

u

:

r

3

r

1

a

:

p

0

1

m

\

s QAQC

5

r

1

e

0

s

2

/ Checker

U

\

4

:

/

5 C Project No.

:

: E SD 5

E T 14139

L

A

I

D F