Sfrta Bus Ridership
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Riding Public Wheels, Rails KRISTINA's ROUTE
PUBLIC TRANSIT DAY Riding public wheels, rails Trip from Wellington to Delray went smoothly on Palm Tran, Tri‐ Rail. By Kristina Webb Palm Beach Post Staff Writer A northbound Tri‐Rail train pulls away from the Intermodal Transit Center in West Palm Beach on Friday, which was Public Transit Day, newly observed in South Florida this year. KRISTINA WEBB / THE PALM BEACH POST KRISTINA’S ROUTE Here’s the route Post transportation reporter Kristina Webb took Friday during Public Transit Day: Webb 7:20 a.m.: Boarded the 7:20 a.m. eastbound Route 2 Palm Tran bus at the Mall at Wellington Green 7:50 a.m.: Arrived at the Intermodal Transit Center in West Palm Beach 8 a.m.: Boarded a southbound Tri‐Rail train 8:30 a.m.: Got off the train at the Delray Beach station on Congress Avenue 8:45 a.m.: Hopped on a Delray Beach trolley About 9 a.m.: Left the trolley on Atlantic Avenue in downtown Delray and grabbed breakfast at Subculture Coffee 9:30 a.m.: Boarded the trolley back to the Delray Tri‐Rail station 9:50 a.m.: Boarded a northbound Tri‐Rail train 10:05 a.m.: Arrived at the Lake Worth Tri‐Rail station and boarded the westbound Route 62 Palm Tran bus 10:50 a.m.: Arrived back at the Mall at Wellington Green COST Roundtrip Tri‐Rail fare between West Palm Beach and Delray Beach: $8.25 Palm Tran daypass: $5 As I stood next to Palm Tran Executive Director Clinton Forbes near the Mall at Wellington Green on Friday morning, I realized I needed to make a confession. -
Tri-Rail 2013 On-Board Survey
TRI-RAIL 2013 ON-BOARD SURVEY Prepared for: July 2013 South Florida Regional Transportation Authority 800 NW 33rd Street Pompano Beach, FL 33064 Prepared by: HNTB Corporation 8700 West Flagler Street, Suite 402 Miami, FL 33174 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Scope of the Effort ........................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Previous Tri-Rail Surveys .................................................................................................. 3 2.0 SURVEY DESIGN ............................................................................................. 4 2.1 Sampling Plan ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Survey Instrument ............................................................................................................ 7 2.2.1 Overview / Comparison to Previous Survey Results ................................................................................ 7 2.2.2 Pretest ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.0 MINIMIZATION/MITIGATION OF NON-RESPONSE BIAS ................................. 9 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................... 10 4.1 Training .......................................................................................................................... -
Downtown Master Plan
DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES FORT LAUDERDALE Building a Livable Downtown chapter Transit Oriented Development Guidelines4 Adopted: February 4, 2014 TOD GUIDELINES ADOPTED FEBRUARY 4, 2014 PREFACE In 2003, the City partnered with the Downtown Development Downtown Fort Lauderdale continues to grow and mature as the Authority (DDA) and other major stakeholders to create this County’s regional city. As a great tropical city, the quality of life of Downtown Master Plan, a blueprint for the future development of its neighbors and visitors cannot be compromised. New Downtown Fort Lauderdale. The Master Plan was amended in development must knit together the urban fabric into a seamless 2007 to better address and focus on active streetscapes and pattern of beautiful streets, public spaces and buildings of the building design. After a period of stagnant growth caused by the highest quality, all within easy access to various modes of 2009 global recession, Downtown Fort Lauderdale has transportation. Mobility options are essential to keep people moving experienced an influx in new residential development applications throughout the City and for the continued economic health and and built projects. vibrancy of the Downtown. Investments in multimodal transportation options and creating a safe and walkable city For the first time in almost a century, many American cities are were identified as top ranked priorities of Fast Forward Fort growing at a faster rate than their surrounding suburbs. Across the Lauderdale: the City’s 2035 Vision Plan. country, cities are competing with one another to attract young professionals to live, work and play in their downtowns. Seniors There are several transformative projects that will help support the and families are also benefitting from living in cities that contain growth of Downtown Fort Lauderdale while ensuring safe and high quality amenities and basic services linked together by efficient mobility. -
Aware Pilot Project Along South Florida Rail Corridor
AWARE PILOT PROJECT ALONG SOUTH FLORIDA RAIL CORRIDOR FINAL PROJECT REPORT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT # BC498 AMENDMENT #2 Prepared by: Nestor Traffic Systems, Inc. Report Date: June 4, 2002 400 Massasoit Ave. Suite 200 East Providence, RI 02914 Telephone: 401-434-5522 Fax: 401-434-5809 Internet: www.nestor.com Copyright © 2002, Nestor Traffic Systems, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................. 1-5 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................................. 2-1 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (AS PROPOSED)........................................................................................................... -
Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2018/2019 to 2022/2023
2019 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2018/2019 TO 2022/2023 TIP Citizen’s Version TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION FOR THE MIAMI URBANIZED AREA 2019 – 2023 CITIZENS TIP This document was prepared by the Transportation Planning Organization for the Miami Urbanized Area in collaboration with the Florida Department of Transportation; Miami-Dade Expressway Authority; Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise; South Florida Regional Transportation Authority; Miami-Dade County Office of Strategic Business Management; Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works, Miami-Dade County Aviation Department; Miami-Dade Seaport Department; Miami-Dade League of Cities; Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources; and the Miami-Dade County Developmental Impact Committee. The Miami-Dade TPO complies with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which states: No person in the United States shall, on grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. It is also the policy of the Miami-Dade TPO to comply with all of the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. For materials in accessible format please call (305) 375-4507. The preparation of this report has been financed in part from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) through the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and/or the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the State Planning and Research Program (Section 505 of Title 23, U.S. Code) and Miami-Dade County, Florida. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. -
West Palm Beach to Miami, Florida
All Aboard Florida Final Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Determination Appendices Appendix 1.1-A2 2013 FONSI, All Aboard Florida Passenger Rail Project – West Palm Beach to Miami, Florida Appendices U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR THE ALL ABOARD FLORIDA PASSENGER RAIL PROJECT WEST PALM BEACH TO MIAMI, FLORIDA JANUARY 2013 All Aboard Florida –West Palm Beach to Miami January 2013 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION U.S. DOT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Purpose and Need 3.0 Alternatives 3.1 Alternatives Considered and Dismissed from Further Analysis A. Eliminated System Alternatives B. Eliminated Station Alternatives 3.2 Alternatives Retained for Further Analysis A. No-Build Alternative B. System Alternative (Preferred Build System Alternative) C. Station and VMF Alternatives 1. West Palm Beach Station Alternatives North Option Central Option (Preferred Build Station Alternative) 2. Fort Lauderdale Station Alternatives North Option (Preferred Build Station Alternative) South Option 3. Miami Station Alternatives South At-Grade Option Central Elevated Option (Preferred Build Station Alternative) 4. VMF 4.0 Rationale for Choosing the Selected Alternative 5.0 Summary of Environmental Impacts A. Air Quality B. Water Quality C. Floodplains D. Wetlands E. Noise and Vibration F. Ecological Systems G. Threatened and Endangered Species H. Transportation 1. Rail Transportation 2. Regional Roadway Transportation 3. Local Roadway Transportation 4. Parking I. Demographics and Environmental Justice J. Barriers to Elderly and Handicapped K. Public Health and Safety L. Cultural Resources M. Section 4(f) and Recreational Resources N. Construction Impacts O. Potential Secondary and Cumulative Impacts 6.0 Comments 7.0 Commitments 8.0 Conclusion 2 42 All Aboard Florida –West Palm Beach to Miami January 2013 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION U.S. -
The Florida Rail System Plan: Investment Element
The Florida Rail System Plan: Investment Element prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. With support from Planning Innovations, Inc Quandel Consultants December 2010 Florida Department of Transportation CHARLIE CRIST " STEPHANIE C. KOPELOUSOS 605 Suwannee Street GOVERNOR Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 SECRETARY December 14, 2010 Citizens of Florida: I am pleased to submit to you the Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan. Unlike in past years, where the Florida Rail System Plan was more descriptive of the separate freight and passenger rail systems, this plan is more visionary, strategic, and policy-driven. The plan was guided by a broad base of stakeholders, including the Rail Stakeholder Advisory Committee, members of the public and private sectors, modes of transportation, economic development and environmental interests, and citizen representatives. The Committee and others worked throughout the summer and fall of 2009 to develop an inventory of Florida's rail system needs and recommend priority investments that support the strategic goals, objectives, and policies of the Florida Rail System Plan. The Florida Rail System Plan is comprised of a Policy Element and this document, the Investment Element. The Policy Element provides a broad policy framework for the investment of limited state resources in Florida's rail system. The Investment Element builds upon the framework of the Policy Element by identifying the needs of Florida's rail system, establishing priorities for the investment of state funds, and setting forth future action steps necessary to implement the plan. Florida in the year 2030 will be shaped by the actions, decisions, and policy choices made today. -
Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan Technical Memorandum #1 – Existing Conditions
Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan Technical Memorandum #1 – Existing Conditions August 2015 Cypress Creek Mobility Hub Master Plan – Technical Memorandum #1 1 Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 8 3.0 Planning Context ............................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Relevant Plans and Policies ............................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Land Use and Development Pattern .............................................................................................. 20 3.3 Transportation Network ................................................................................................................ 21 3.4 Utilities ............................................................................................................................................ 29 4.0 Regulatory Environment ............................................................................................................... 37 4.1 Existing Land Use and Zoning ......................................................................................................... 37 4.2 Future Land Use and Zoning .......................................................................................................... -
3.0 Passenger Rail Services and Initiatives in Florida
Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan 3.0 Passenger Rail Services and Initiatives in Florida 3.1 Overview Although Florida’s total population shrunk by about 60,000 residents in 2009 – a first in over three decades according to state demographers – and overall population growth rates have declined three points to approximately 2 percent annually due in large part to the nationwide recession and declining housing market, the State is expected to continue to attract retirees and residents looking for warmer weather and low costs of living. State demographers at the University of Florida predict that once the recession ends, Florida can expect to grow as much as 200,000 people per year – fewer than the 300,000 a year the State averaged during the past three decades, but enough to lead most other states in net growth. By 2035, more than 25 million people will call Florida home, representing a 56 percent increase between 2000 and 2035.45 In absolute terms, Florida will add over 9 million people to its population between this time period. Furthermore, although much of Florida’s growth will be concentrated in urbanized areas, growth will occur across Florida’s regions and urbanized area boundaries will expand across county lines. Florida’s density per square mile was 344 according to the 2009 Census and was ranked the eighth densest state in the nation. Population growth, and the associated transportation demand, will place additional pressure on all aspects of the State’s transportation system. A growing population not only adds automobiles to roadways, but the increase in economic activity to support this population also will generate additional demands for freight movement. -
Strategic Intermodal System Urban Fixed Guideway
Strategic Intermodal System Urban Fixed Guideway To plan for an efficient and safe Urban Fixed Guideway Terminals in Florida transportation network in Florida, Located Serves SIS Integrated Co-located with the state legislature and Florida Facility Name District System Designation at or near air, sea, or with other major Park-&- termini spaceport SIS system Ride Facility Department of Transportation (FDOT) DeLand Station* 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No No No developed the Strategic Intermodal DeBary Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub Yes No No No System (SIS). As part of the SIS, there Sanford Auto Train Track Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No are specific elements Lake Mary Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No that have been identified as critical to Longwood Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No the economic success of Florida. Altamonte Springs Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No Maitland Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No One of these elements are Urban Fixed Winter Park / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No Yes No Guideway (UFG) terminals, which Advent Health Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No No Yes serve as hubs and stations for the urban Lynx Central Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No fixed guideways throughout Florida. Church Street Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No Orlando Health / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Hub No No Yes No The adjacent table lists the UFG Sand Lake Road 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No terminals within Florida and whether Meadow Woods Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No they are designated as a SIS Hub or Tupperware Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No SIS Station, based on criteria defined Kissimmee / Amtrak Station 5 SunRail SIS Station No No No No by FDOT. -
Tri-Rail Coastal Link and Downtown Miami Link
Tri-Rail Coastal Link and Downtown Miami Link Neat Streets Miami May 27, 2015 Tri-Rail Milestones • Service began Jan 9, 1989 • Double-tracking completed in 2006 – Allowed for reliable and more frequent service • 4 million annual boardings for first time in 2008 • 76+ million passengers carried to date • Modernization efforts and upgrades ongoing 2 Current Tri-Rail Service • 72 mile system • Now 18 stations • 50 trains per weekday • Peak- 20 & 30 minutes • Off Peak- 60 minutes • Hourly weekend service since March 2013 • Growing and changing Miami Int’l Airport ridership patterns 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 Monthly Tri Jul-05 Oct-05 Jan-06 Apr-06 Jul-06 Oct-06 - Rail Ridership Rail Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Ridership Growth Ridership Apr-10 Tri Jul-10 2014 2005 to 140% from - Oct-10 Rail ridership increased Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Tri Jan-12 Apr-12 - Jul-12 Rail Oct-12 Jan-13 Apr-13 Jul-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 Oct-14 Ridership Trends • Significant changes identified in recent onboard survey: – Slightly more northbound riders in AM than southbound – Boca Raton & Metrorail Transfer Boca Raton station during PM rush hour are busiest weekday stations – Increase in passengers age 16-24 – Greater use of bicycles and shuttle buses to/from stations • Prompted investment in improved bicycle infrastructure Current Tri-Rail Markets • Inter-county travel • Airports • Suburban employment centers and office parks • Colleges & universities -
Transportation Improvement Program Citizens Version
Metr a op e o r l A it d a e n z i P n l a a n b n r i n U i g m O a i r g M a e n h i t z a r o t i f o n Table of Contents Page(s) # Message to the Reader 3 About this document 3 What it the TIP 3 TIP: Putting the Long Range Transportation Plan into Action 3 Some Basic Facts about Miami-Dade County 4 The TIP’s Mechanichs: Why is there a TIP? 5 Who prepares the TIP? 5 How does the TIP work? 5 TIP Consistency 6 What fiscal years does the TIP include? 6 What does the TIP include? 6 Who participates in putting the TIP together? 6 Transportation and Air Quality go hand in hand 6 The TIP’s Technicalities: Who must approve the TIP locally? 7 Who must approve the TIP at the State level? 7 Who must approve the TIP at the federal level? 7 Where does the MPO gets its authority? 7 TIP Program Funding: Where does Highway funding comes from? 7 Where does Transit funding comes from? 7 Primary State Highways and Intermodal Projects 8, 9, 10 Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) 11, 12, 13 Florida’s Turnpike District Improvements 14 Secondary Road Improvements 15 Road Impact Fee Improvements 16 Local Option Gas Tax (LOGT) Improvements 17, 18 Private Sector Improvements 19 Airport Development Improvements 20, 21 Multimodal Seaport Development 22, 23, 24 Public Transportation Improvements 25, 26 1 Table of Contents (Continued) Page(s) # Tri-County Commuter Rail (Tri-Rail) System 27, 28 APPENDIX A: Completed Highway Projects 29 FY 2002 Completed Projects - Florida Department of Transportation District 6 30 FY 2003 Completed Projects - Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) 31 FY 2002 Completed Projects – Miami-Dade County Public Works Department 32 APPENDIX B: Under Construction Highway Projects 33 Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) 34, 35 Miami-Dade County Public Works Department 36 Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise 37 2 A CITIZENS’ GUIDE TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) MESSAGE TO THE READER Thank you for your interest and participation in the Miami Urban Area transportation planning process and in particular the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).