Melioidosis in Northern Tanzania: an Important Cause of Febrile Illness?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Melioidosis in Northern Tanzania: an Important Cause of Febrile Illness? Melioidosis and serological evidence of exposure to Burkholderia pseudomallei among patients with fever, northern Tanzania Michael Maze Department of Medicine University of Otago, Christchurch Melioidosis Melioidosis caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei • Challenging to identify when cultured Soil reservoir, with human infection from contact with contaminated water Most infected people are asymptomatic: 1 clinical illness for 4,500 antibody producing exposures Febrile illness with a variety of presentations and bacteraemia is present in 40-60% of people with acute illness Estimated 89,000 deaths globally Gavin Koh CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=4975784 Laboratory diagnosis of febrile inpatients, northern Tanzania, 2007-8 (n=870) Malaria (1.6%) Bacteremia (9.8%) Mycobacteremia (1.6%) Fungemia (2.9%) Brucellosis (3.5%) Leptospirosis (8.8%) Q fever (5.0%) No diagnosis (50.1%) Spotted fever group rickettsiosis (8.0%) Typhus group rickettsiosis (0.4%) Chikungunya (7.9%) Crump PLoS Neglect Trop Dis 2013; 7: e2324 Predicted environmental suitability for B. pseudomallei in East Africa Large areas of Africa are predicted to be highly suitable for Burkholderia pseudomallei East Africa is less suitable but pockets of higher suitability including northern Tanzania Northern Tanzania Increasing suitability for B. pseudomallei Limmathurotsakul Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(1). Melioidosis epidemiology in Africa Paucity of empiric data • Scattered case reports • Report from Kilifi, Kenya identified 4 bacteraemic cases from 66,000 patients who had blood cultured1 • 5.9% seroprevalence among healthy adults in Uganda2 • No reports from Tanzania 1. Limmathurotsakul Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(1). 2. Frazer J R Army Med Corps. 1982;128(3):123-30. Study Aim Determine the prevalence of melioidosis prevalence and B. pseudomallei exposure in northern Tanzania Methods – Blood culture surveillance Prospective hospital based surveillance during 2007-08, 2012-14 and 2016-19 Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (630 bed hospital) and Mawenzi Regional Hospital (430 bed hospital) Enrolled all patients with a febrile illness Methods – Blood culture surveillance Blood inoculated into BacT Alert standard (10ml) or paediatric bottles (4ml) Isolates identified using API20NE biochemical identification system All isolated non-glucose fermenting gram-negative bacilli were tested by B. pseudomallei latex agglutination test Methods – Serological testing Participants admitted within 30 days of rainfall during 2012-2014 Acute serum, and convalescent serum 4-6 weeks after enrolment B. pseudomallei indirect haemaglutination testing • Probable acute melioidosis: ≥4 fold rise in reciprocal antibody titres • B. pseudomallei seropositivity: single titre ≥40 Characteristics of participants undergoing blood culture, Tanzania, 2012-14 (N=3,699) N n (%) Demographic characteristics Age, median (IQR) years 3,598 19.6 (1.9, 39.2) Male sex 3,595 1,788 (49.7) Risk factors Rainfall in 30 days prior to admission, median (IQR) mm 1,738 24.0 (1.8, 67.7) Farming occupation 1,445 261 (18.1) Self reported HIV-infected or positive HIV serology 2,605 428 (16.4) Clinical history Illness duration, median (IQR) days 3,334 5 (3,14) Dyspnoea 2,595 813 (31.3) Rash or cutaneous lesion 1,445 117 (8.1) Blood culture results, Tanzania, 2007-2019 1832 (70.2%) of 2,607 had adequately filled blood culture bottles 5 (0.1%) non-enteric gram negative bacteria isolated 0 B. pseudomallei Characteristics of participants undergoing Burkholderia pseudomallei indirect haemagglutination testing, Tanzania, 2012-14 (N=323) n (%) Demographic characteristics Age, median (IQR) years 27 (5,40) Male sex 142 (44.0) Risk factors Rainfall in 30 days prior to admission, median (IQR) mm 46 (27,2) Farming occupation 66 (20.6) Self reported HIV-infected 44 (13.6) Clinical history Fever duration, median (IQR) days 4 (2,7) Dyspnea 101 (31.4) Rash or cutaneous lesion 24 (8.4) Distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei indirect hemagglutination test reciprocal antibody titers among febrile patients, Tanzania, 2012-14 250 Seropositivity cut-off 200 57 (17.7%) seropositive 150 2 (0.6%) probable melioidosis 100 50 Numberof participants 0 <10 10 20 40 80 160 320 640 1,280 10,240 Reciprocal indirect hemagglutination assay antibody titer to B. pseudomallei Interpretation: Blood culture No positive blood cultures among >3,500 patients over 12 years • Most single bottle inoculation • 30% culture bottles inadequately filled • Culture of blood only Unlikely to be a major cause of febrile illness in the region Does not preclude the presence of melioidosis • In Kenya: 4 cases from 66,000 blood cultures Interpretation: Serology 18% seropositive by IHA is high by global standards • Similar to serosurveys in Australia • 5.9% seropositive among healthy adults in Kampala, Uganda 1982 Seropositivity indicates exposure to B. pseudomallei, but cross- reactivity with B. mallei or environmental Burkholderia possible Deliberately biased sample, as presence of exposure was previously unknown Conclusions and next steps High prevalence of B. pseudomallei exposure but absence of confirmed bacteraemic melioidosis is notable Unlikely that melioidosis is a major cause of fever in northern Tanzania Ongoing blood culture surveillance and environmental sampling warranted Acknowledgements University of Otago: John Crump, Katrina Frances G. Cotter, Sandy Smith and MacGibbon Sharples Scholarships US National Institutes of Health-National Science Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre: Foundation Ecology of Infectious Disease program Blandina Mmbaga, Venance Maro, Kajiru (R01TW009237) US National Institutes of Health, Kilonzo, Francis Karia, Research Team National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Duke University: Matt Rubach, Manuela Diseases (R01 AI121378) Carugati, Holly Biggs, Deng Madut Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J010367/1, BB/L018926, BB/L017679, BB/L018845) Tanzania Ministry of Health: Wilbrod Saganda, Bingileki Lwezaula US Centers for Disease Control & Prevention: Renee Galloway, William Nicholson, Robyn Stoddard, Alex Hoffmaster, Mindy Elrod.
Recommended publications
  • Parinaud's Oculoglandular Syndrome
    Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Case Report Parinaud’s Oculoglandular Syndrome: A Case in an Adult with Flea-Borne Typhus and a Review M. Kevin Dixon 1, Christopher L. Dayton 2 and Gregory M. Anstead 3,4,* 1 Baylor Scott & White Clinic, 800 Scott & White Drive, College Station, TX 77845, USA; [email protected] 2 Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA; [email protected] 3 Medical Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA 4 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-210-567-4666; Fax: +1-210-567-4670 Received: 7 June 2020; Accepted: 24 July 2020; Published: 29 July 2020 Abstract: Parinaud’s oculoglandular syndrome (POGS) is defined as unilateral granulomatous conjunctivitis and facial lymphadenopathy. The aims of the current study are to describe a case of POGS with uveitis due to flea-borne typhus (FBT) and to present a diagnostic and therapeutic approach to POGS. The patient, a 38-year old man, presented with persistent unilateral eye pain, fever, rash, preauricular and submandibular lymphadenopathy, and laboratory findings of FBT: hyponatremia, elevated transaminase and lactate dehydrogenase levels, thrombocytopenia, and hypoalbuminemia. His condition rapidly improved after starting doxycycline. Soon after hospitalization, he was diagnosed with uveitis, which responded to topical prednisolone. To derive a diagnostic and empiric therapeutic approach to POGS, we reviewed the cases of POGS from its various causes since 1976 to discern epidemiologic clues and determine successful diagnostic techniques and therapies; we found multiple cases due to cat scratch disease (CSD; due to Bartonella henselae) (twelve), tularemia (ten), sporotrichosis (three), Rickettsia conorii (three), R.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognizing and Treating New and Emerging Infections Encountered in Everyday Practice
    Recognizing and treating new and emerging infections encountered in everyday practice STEVEN M. GORDON, MD NFECTIOUS DISEASES, pre- MiikWirj:« Although infectious diseases were once considered a dicted earlier in this cen- diminishing threat, new pathogens are constantly challenging tury to be eliminated as a the health care system. This article reviews the clinical presen- public health problem, re- tation, diagnosis, and treatment of seven emerging infections I main the chief cause of death that primary care physicians are likely to encounter. worldwide and a significant cause of death and morbidity in i Parvovirus B19 attacks erythrocyte precursors; the United States.1 Challenging infection is usually benign and self-limiting but can cause the US public health system are aplastic crises in patients with chronic hemolytic disorders. several newly identified patho- Hemorrhagic colitis due to Escherichia coli 0157:H7 infection gens (eg, human immunodefi- can lead to the hemolytic-uremic syndrome, especially in chil- ciency virus [HIV], Escherichia dren; it also can cause thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura. coli 0157:H7, hepatitis C) and a Chlamydia pneumoniae causes a mild pneumonia that resem- resurgence of old diseases pre- bles mycoplasmal pneumonia. Bacillary angiomatosis primar- sumed to be under control (eg, ily affects immunocompromised patients, especially those tuberculosis, syphilis). Further, infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). At least multiple-drug resistance in two organisms can cause bacillary angiomatosis: Bartonella hense- strains of pneumococci, gono- lae and Bartonella quintana. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome cocci, enterococci, staphylo- is spread by exposure to the droppings of infected rodents. cocci, salmonella, and mycobac- Contrary to previous thought, HIV continues to replicate teria undermines efforts to throughout the course of the illness and does not have a latency control the diseases they cause.2 phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyme Disease Weather Also Means That Ticks Become More Active and This Can Agent by Feeding As Larvae on Certain Rodent Species
    Spring and summer bring warm temperatures, just right for small and medium sized animals, but will also feed on people. walking in the woods and other outdoor activities. Warm These ticks typically become infected with the Lyme disease weather also means that ticks become more active and this can agent by feeding as larvae on certain rodent species. increase the risk of a tick-borne disease. The tick-borne dis- In the fall, the nymphs become adults and infected nymphs eases that occur most often in Virginia are Lyme disease, become infected adults. Adult blacklegged ticks prefer to feed Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and ehrlichiosis. on deer. However, adult ticks will occasionally bite people on warm days of the fall and winter and can transmit Lyme disease Lyme Disease at that time. Lyme disease is caused by infection with a bacterium called Borrelia burgdorferi. The number of Lyme disease cases Transmission of Lyme disease by the nymph or adult ticks reported in Virginia has increased substantially in recent years. does not occur until the tick has been attached and feeding on a human or animal host for at least 36 hours. The Tick The blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis), formerly known as The Symptoms the deer tick, is the only carrier of Lyme disease in the Eastern Between three days to several weeks after being bitten by an U.S. The blacklegged tick's name comes from it being the only infected tick, 70-90% of people develop a circular or oval rash, tick in the Eastern U.S. that bites humans and has legs that are called erythema migrans (or EM), at the site of the bite.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable Disease Surveillance in Virginia, 2013
    Reportable Disease Surveillance in Virginia, 2013 Marissa J. Levine, MD, MPH State Health Commissioner Report Production Team: Division of Surveillance and Investigation, Division of Disease Prevention, Division of Environmental Epidemiology, and Division of Immunization Virginia Department of Health Post Office Box 2448 Richmond, Virginia 23218 www.vdh.virginia.gov ACKNOWLEDGEMENT In addition to the employees of the work units listed below, the Office of Epidemiology would like to acknowledge the contributions of all those engaged in disease surveillance and control activities across the state throughout the year. We appreciate the commitment to public health of all epidemiology staff in local and district health departments and the Regional and Central Offices, as well as the conscientious work of nurses, environmental health specialists, infection preventionists, physicians, laboratory staff, and administrators. These persons report or manage disease surveillance data on an ongoing basis and diligently strive to control morbidity in Virginia. This report would not be possible without the efforts of all those who collect and follow up on morbidity reports. Divisions in the Virginia Department of Health Office of Epidemiology Disease Prevention Telephone: 804-864-7964 Environmental Epidemiology Telephone: 804-864-8182 Immunization Telephone: 804-864-8055 Surveillance and Investigation Telephone: 804-864-8141 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Know Your Abcs: a Quick Guide to Reportable Infectious Diseases in Ohio
    Know Your ABCs: A Quick Guide to Reportable Infectious Diseases in Ohio From the Ohio Administrative Code Chapter 3701-3; Effective August 1, 2019 Class A: Diseases of major public health concern because of the severity of disease or potential for epidemic spread – report immediately via telephone upon recognition that a case, a suspected case, or a positive laboratory result exists. • Anthrax • Measles • Rubella (not congenital) • Viral hemorrhagic fever • Botulism, foodborne • Meningococcal disease • Severe acute respiratory (VHF), including Ebola virus • Cholera • Middle East Respiratory syndrome (SARS) disease, Lassa fever, Marburg • Diphtheria Syndrome (MERS) • Smallpox hemorrhagic fever, and • Influenza A – novel virus • Plague • Tularemia Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic infection • Rabies, human fever Any unexpected pattern of cases, suspected cases, deaths or increased incidence of any other disease of major public health concern, because of the severity of disease or potential for epidemic spread, which may indicate a newly recognized infectious agent, outbreak, epidemic, related public health hazard or act of bioterrorism. Class B: Disease of public health concern needing timely response because of potential for epidemic spread – report by the end of the next business day after the existence of a case, a suspected case, or a positive laboratory result is known. • Amebiasis • Carbapenemase-producing • Hepatitis B (perinatal) • Salmonellosis • Arboviral neuroinvasive and carbapenem-resistant • Hepatitis C (non-perinatal) • Shigellosis
    [Show full text]
  • Lyme Disease Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever Tick Paralysis Haemobartonellosis Tularemia Ehrlichiosis Anaplasmosis
    Fall is the beginning of tick season in our area. However, you can find ticks all year round if you like to hike or camp in the woods, or other type of outdoor activities. Ticks are not as easy to kill as fleas, but there are several different ways to control ticks from oral to topical medications and well as collars. If you find a tick embedded in your pet and you choose to try and remove it, be aware that you can accidentally leave the head behind. This can cause a local irritation even possibly an infection. We will be happy to assist with removing a tick for you to help prevent any problems. Protecting your cat or dog (or both) from ticks is an important part of disease prevention. In fact, there are several diseases that can be transmitted to your pet from a tick bite. Some of the most common tick-borne diseases seen in the Western United States are: Lyme Disease Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever Tick Paralysis Haemobartonellosis Tularemia Ehrlichiosis Anaplasmosis Lyme Disease Also called borreliosis, Lyme disease is caused by the bacteria Borrelia burgdorferi. Deer ticks carry these bacteria, transmitting them to the animal while sucking its blood. The tick must be attached to the dog (or cat) for about 48 hours in order to transmit the bacteria to the animal's bloodstream. If the tick is removed before this, transmission will usually not occur. Common signs of Lyme disease include lameness, fever, swollen lymph nodes and joints, and a reduced appetite. In severe cases, animals may develop kidney disease, heart conditions, or nervous system disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Tick-Borne Disease Working Group 2020 Report to Congress
    2nd Report Supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services • Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health Tick-Borne Disease Working Group 2020 Report to Congress Information and opinions in this report do not necessarily reflect the opinions of each member of the Working Group, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or any other component of the Federal government. Table of Contents Executive Summary . .1 Chapter 4: Clinical Manifestations, Appendices . 114 Diagnosis, and Diagnostics . 28 Chapter 1: Background . 4 Appendix A. Tick-Borne Disease Congressional Action ................. 8 Chapter 5: Causes, Pathogenesis, Working Group .....................114 and Pathophysiology . 44 The Tick-Borne Disease Working Group . 8 Appendix B. Tick-Borne Disease Working Chapter 6: Treatment . 51 Group Subcommittees ...............117 Second Report: Focus and Structure . 8 Chapter 7: Clinician and Public Appendix C. Acronyms and Abbreviations 126 Chapter 2: Methods of the Education, Patient Access Working Group . .10 to Care . 59 Appendix D. 21st Century Cures Act ...128 Topic Development Briefs ............ 10 Chapter 8: Epidemiology and Appendix E. Working Group Charter. .131 Surveillance . 84 Subcommittees ..................... 10 Chapter 9: Federal Inventory . 93 Appendix F. Federal Inventory Survey . 136 Federal Inventory ....................11 Chapter 10: Public Input . 98 Appendix G. References .............149 Minority Responses ................. 13 Chapter 11: Looking Forward . .103 Chapter 3: Tick Biology, Conclusion . 112 Ecology, and Control . .14 Contributions U.S. Department of Health and Human Services James J. Berger, MS, MT(ASCP), SBB B. Kaye Hayes, MPA Working Group Members David Hughes Walker, MD (Co-Chair) Adalbeto Pérez de León, DVM, MS, PhD Leigh Ann Soltysiak, MS (Co-Chair) Kevin R.
    [Show full text]
  • IAP Guidelines on Rickettsial Diseases in Children
    G U I D E L I N E S IAP Guidelines on Rickettsial Diseases in Children NARENDRA RATHI, *ATUL KULKARNI AND #VIJAY Y EWALE; FOR INDIAN A CADEMY OF PEDIATRICS GUIDELINES ON RICKETTSIAL DISEASES IN CHILDREN COMMITTEE From Smile Healthcare, Rehabilitation and Research Foundation, Smile Institute of Child Health, Ramdaspeth, Akola; *Department of Pediatrics, Ashwini Medical College, Solapur; and #Dr Yewale Multispeciality Hospital for Children, Navi Mumbai; for Indian Academy of Pediatrics “Guidelines on Rickettsial Diseases in Children” Committee. Correspondence to: Dr Narendra Rathi, Consultant Pediatrician, Smile Healthcare, Rehabilitation & Research Foundation, Smile Institute of Child Health, Ramdaspeth, Akola, Maharashtra, India. [email protected]. Objective: To formulate practice guidelines on rickettsial diseases in children for pediatricians across India. Justification: Rickettsial diseases are increasingly being reported from various parts of India. Due to low index of suspicion, nonspecific clinical features in early course of disease, and absence of easily available, sensitive and specific diagnostic tests, these infections are difficult to diagnose. With timely diagnosis, therapy is easy, affordable and often successful. On the other hand, in endemic areas, where healthcare workers have high index of suspicion for these infections, there is rampant and irrational use of doxycycline as a therapeutic trial in patients of undifferentiated fevers. Thus, there is a need to formulate practice guidelines regarding rickettsial diseases in children in Indian context. Process: A committee was formed for preparing guidelines on rickettsial diseases in children in June 2016. A meeting of consultative committee was held in IAP office, Mumbai and scientific content was discussed. Methodology and results were scrutinized by all members and consensus was reached.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever
    Department of Public Health Office of Epidemiology 4041 N Central Ave. Ste 600 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (RMSF) is a disease caused by the bacteria Rickettsia rickettsii. The bacteria are transmitted to humans through the bite of an infected tick, most commonly the American dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis) or Rocky Mountain wood tick (Dermacentor andersoni). The disease was first recognized in the Rocky Mountain area, however, despite the disease’s name, relatively few cases occur in the Rocky Mountain west. Most cases of RMSF occur in the Southeast and South central regions of the United States between the months of April and August, but in Arizona tick activity has been seen from March to September. RMSF used to be a rare disease in Arizona, however, it has become increasingly common over the last several years. Between 2003 and 2012, over 250 cases and 19 fatalities occurred in Arizona. Almost all of these cases occurred in areas with large amounts of free-roaming dogs and severe tick infestations, including six Tribal lands. During 2010-2011, RMSF in Arizona occurred at a rate ~200 times the national average. RMSF can be rapidly fatal if not treated within the first 5 days of symptom onset. Before tetracycline antibiotics were available, case fatality rates ranged from 20-80%. Signs and Symptoms Symptoms usually present in 2-14 days usually with a sudden onset of moderate to high fever, significant malaise, deep muscle pain, severe headache, chills and conjunctival infection. The “typical” triad of fever, rash, and tick bite are only presented between 21-40% of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Rickettsia Felis, Bartonella Henselae, and B. Clarridgeiae, New Zealand
    LETTERS Richard Reithinger,*† domestic and wild animals that also products obtained by PCR with Khoksar Aadil,† Samad Hami,† feeds readily on people. Recent stud- primers for the 17-kDa protein (4), and Jan Kolaczinski*† ies have implicated the cat flea as a citrate synthase (4), and PS 120 pro- *London School of Hygiene and Tropical vector of new and emerging infectious tein (5) genes. R. felis has been estab- Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and diseases (1). To determine the lished in tissue culture (XTC-2 and †HealthNet International, Peshawar, pathogens in C. felis in New Zealand, Vero cells) (6), and serologic testing Pakistan we collected 3 cat fleas from each of has been used to diagnose infections 11 dogs and 21 cats at the Massey (5). Reports indicate that patients References University Veterinary Teaching respond rapidly to doxycycline thera- 1. Ashford R, Kohestany K, Karimzad M. Hospital from May to June 2003. The py (5), and in vitro studies have Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Kabul: observa- fleas were stored in 95% alcohol until shown the organism is susceptible to tions on a prolonged epidemic. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1992;86:361–71. they were identified by using morpho- rifampin, thiamphenicol, and fluoro- 2. Griffiths WDA. Old World cutaneous leish- logic criteria and washed in sterile quinolones. maniasis. In: Peters W, Killick-Kendrick R, phosphate-buffered saline. The DNA B. henselae is an agent of cat- editors. The leishmaniases in biology and from each flea was extracted individ- scratch disease, bacillary angiomato- medicine. London: Academic Press; 1987. p. 617–43. ually by using the QiaAmp Tissue Kit sis, bacillary peliosis, endocarditis, 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever in Children
    Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever in Children Charles R. Woods, MD, MS KEYWORDS Rocky mountain spotted fever Rickettsia rickettsii Rash Increased intracranial pressure Sepsis Doxycycline KEY POINTS Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is typically undifferentiated from many other infec- tions in the first few days of illness. Treatment should not be delayed pending confirmation of infection when RMSF is suspected. Doxycycline is the drug of choice even for infants and children less than 8 years old. INTRODUCTION RMSF is caused by Rickettsia rickettsii, the prototypical member of the spotted fever subgroup of rickettsial species. RMSF was first recognized as a clinical entity in the 1890s in Idaho and Montana. In the past century, RMSF has been identified within 46 states in the United States. R rickettsii also causes disease in many parts of Central and South America, where the infection is given other names, such as Brazilian spotted fever or febre maculosa.1,2 The spotted fever subgroup of Rickettsia now consists of 20 known species that cause similar illnesses worldwide.3–5 R parkeri and other related species are present among tick populations in the United States. Infection by these related species may account in part for the apparent increase in probable, but not confirmed, cases of RMSF in the United States in recent years.6 RMSF remains a nationally notifiable disease, but reporting was changed in 2010 under the broader category of spotted fever rickettsiosis.7 The pathogenesis, clinical features, and management of infections caused by the various agents of spotted fever rickettsiosis are largely the same. Laboratory studies of R conorii, the cause of Mediterranean spotted fever, have provided many insights into R rickettsii infections.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Diagnostics of Rickettsia Infections in Denmark 2008–2015
    biology Article Laboratory Diagnostics of Rickettsia Infections in Denmark 2008–2015 Susanne Schjørring 1,2, Martin Tugwell Jepsen 1,3, Camilla Adler Sørensen 3,4, Palle Valentiner-Branth 5, Bjørn Kantsø 4, Randi Føns Petersen 1,4 , Ole Skovgaard 6,* and Karen A. Krogfelt 1,3,4,6,* 1 Department of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut (SSI), 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark; [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (M.T.J.); [email protected] (R.F.P.) 2 European Program for Public Health Microbiology Training (EUPHEM), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), 27180 Solnar, Sweden 3 Scandtick Innovation, Project Group, InterReg, 551 11 Jönköping, Sweden; [email protected] 4 Virus and Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut (SSI), 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark; [email protected] 5 Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut (SSI), 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark; [email protected] 6 Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark * Correspondence: [email protected] (O.S.); [email protected] (K.A.K.) Received: 19 May 2020; Accepted: 15 June 2020; Published: 19 June 2020 Abstract: Rickettsiosis is a vector-borne disease caused by bacterial species in the genus Rickettsia. Ticks in Scandinavia are reported to be infected with Rickettsia, yet only a few Scandinavian human cases are described, and rickettsiosis is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rickettsiosis in Denmark based on laboratory findings. We found that in the Danish individuals who tested positive for Rickettsia by serology, the majority (86%; 484/561) of the infections belonged to the spotted fever group.
    [Show full text]