DOCSLIB.ORG

Foundation Briefs January/February 2016 Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foundation Briefs January/February 2016 Brief Foundation Briefs January/February 2016 Brief Resolved: In the United States, private ownership of handguns ought to be banned. January/February 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Topic Analysis One ............................................................................................................................................... 16 Aff Evidence ......................................................................................................................................................... 20 Handgun Violence ............................................................................................................................................ 21 The US leads the affluent world in gun violence. LWZ ........................................................................... 21 The NRA tries to hide the reality of gun violence. LWZ. ........................................................................ 21 While knives are still used, guns increase the risk of death. LWZ ........................................................... 22 The US experiences huge numbers of gun violence. LWZ ...................................................................... 22 Handguns are the biggest problem with firearm violence. LWZ .............................................................. 23 We don’t think that we should ban all guns, but handguns are key. LWZ ............................................... 23 Modern handguns have too much killing power. LWZ ............................................................................ 24 Independent of fatalities, injuries from handgun violence are massive and harm the economy. LWZ .... 25 America is actually not that violent, but handguns do contribute to America’s death rate. LWZ ........... 25 Simple cost benefit analysis shows that banning handguns is rational. LWZ .......................................... 26 Easy access to firearms explains our higher per capita homicide rates. LWZ ......................................... 26 Guns contribute to violence everywhere. LWZ ........................................................................................ 27 Guns cause escalation. LWZ ..................................................................................................................... 27 Guns increase violence independent of killings. LWZ ............................................................................. 27 Despite our gun violence, nothing is ever done about it. LWZ ................................................................ 28 America’s gun violence is the highest among developed countries. LWZ ............................................... 28 Privately-owned handguns are a large explanatory factor in our high homicide rate. LWZ .................... 29 Gun ownership at least partly causally explains gun violence. LWZ ....................................................... 29 The research is indisputable – more guns means more deaths. LWZ ....................................................... 29 The evidence is overwhelmingly clear – more guns means more gun deaths. LWZ ............................... 30 Making guns more accessible leads to more crime. LWZ ........................................................................ 30 Mass shootings are only part of the problem – other gun violence and suicides are worse. LWZ .......... 30 foundationbriefs.com Page 2 of 213 January/February 2016 Table of Contents Gun killings in self-defense are only a small fraction of unjustifiable gun deaths, so gun ownership hurts more than it saves. PJG. ............................................................................................................................ 31 Gun ownership harms the community, as countries like the U.S. with high gun ownership have higher levels of homicides. PJG. .......................................................................................................................... 32 Studies show that U.S. states with less gun ownership had lower unjustified shooting rates. PJG. ......... 33 The availability of handguns self-perpetuates the level of ownership. PJG. ............................................ 33 Handguns in particular should be banned because of their prevalence and ease in using them compared to other weapons. PJG. .............................................................................................................................. 34 Race .................................................................................................................................................................. 35 Gun control is key to stopping racialized gun violence. LWZ ................................................................. 35 Gun violence is racialized. LWZ .............................................................................................................. 35 It gets worse in particular states. LWZ ..................................................................................................... 36 Even though it looks like it is getting better, it is not. LWZ ..................................................................... 36 African Americans overwhelmingly support gun control. LWZ .............................................................. 37 Blacks are more likely to experience handgun violence. LWZ ................................................................ 37 Race is a driving factor in white gun ownership. LWZ ............................................................................ 37 Failure to consider race in the gun debate is wrong. LWZ ....................................................................... 38 Blaming gun violence on race is factually incorrect. LWZ. ..................................................................... 38 Race frames the way we discuss gun violence. LWZ. .............................................................................. 39 It’s empirically proven – white perpetrator’s always invite conversations of mental health. LWZ. ........ 40 Race is just used as a scapegoat to avoid a conversation about guns. LWZ. ............................................ 40 The gun lobby uses race to sell guns even though race is not a determinative factor is violent behavior. LWZ. ......................................................................................................................................................... 41 Gun debates fail to account for race. LWZ ............................................................................................... 41 As long as gun murders are of black men in inner cities, we will won’t tackle the gun problem. LWZ . 42 The idea that gun control is racist is historically inaccurate. LWZ .......................................................... 42 Arguments that gun control is racist selectively misread history. LWZ ................................................... 42 Incidents like Newtown are tragic but cover up stories of urban gun violence. LWZ ............................. 43 Mass shootings and gun violence statistics fail to account for the racialized factor of gun violence. LWZ ................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Gun violence is largely about race. LWZ ................................................................................................. 44 foundationbriefs.com Page 3 of 213 January/February 2016 Table of Contents Liberal/conservative views on urban gun violence ignores key facts. LWZ ............................................ 44 Failure to pass gun laws is rooted in racism. LWZ ................................................................................... 45 Narratives of gun violence prevention is typically meant to appeal to white people. LWZ ..................... 45 Fewer guns mean less deaths. Other policy solutions don’t solve gun violence. LWZ ........................... 46 Body cameras and other alternatives don’t change that gun laws are the key factor. We can’t end police shootings until we address gun violence. LWZ ........................................................................................ 47 Guns are a key part of police shootings. LWZ ......................................................................................... 48 Concealed carry culture negatively affects black people. LWZ ............................................................... 49 Gun violence disproportionately affects black America – this is why blacks overwhelmingly support gun control. LWZ ............................................................................................................................................. 50 Guns have been a tool for white racial terror. LWZ ................................................................................. 51 Anti-black violence is backed by guns. LWZ ........................................................................................... 52 Guns are ignored by conservative politicians as a major source of violence in black communities. LWZ ................................................................................................................................................................... 53 Guns have been used by both the state and vigilantes as part
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aliza Shvarts Cv
    A.I.R. ALIZA SHVARTS CV www.alizashvarts.com SOLO AND TWO PERSON EXHIBITIONS 2018 Off Scene, Artspace, New Haven, CT ​ 2016 Aliza Shvarts, Kevin Kavanagh Gallery, Dublin, Ireland ​ 2010 Knowing You Want It, UCLA Royce Hall, Los Angeles, CA ​ SELECTED GROUP EXHIBITIONS 2019 Study Session: Aliza Shvarts, Ayanna Dozier, and Narcissister, The Whitney Museum, NYC 2019 In Practice: Other Objects. SculptureCenter, Long Island City, NY th ​ 2018 ANTI, 6 ​ Athens Biennale. Athens, Greece ​ ​ 2018 A new job to unwork at, Participant Inc, NYC ​ 2018 Aliza Shvarts, Patty Chang & David Kelley. Marathon Screenings, Los Angeles, CA. ​ 2018 International Festival of Arts&Ideas, Public art commission. New Haven, CT ​ 2017 (No) Coma Cuento, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia ​ 2017 Aliza Shvarts and Devin Kenny, Video Artists Working Group, Artists Space, NYC ​ 2017 Goldman Club (with Emanuel Almborg), Dotory, Brooklyn, NY ​ 2016 Situational Diagram: Exhibition Walkthrough, Lévy Gorvy Gallery, NYC ​ 2016 SALT Magazine and Montez Press present, Mathew Gallery, NYC ​ 2016 eX-céntrico: dissidence, sovereignties, performance, The Hemispheric Institute, Santiago, Chile ​ 2016 Subject to capital, Abrons Arts Center, NYC ​ 2015 Soap Box Session: Directing Action, ]performance s p a c e[ London, England. ​ 2015 Learning to Speak in a Future Tense, Abrons Arts Center, NYC ​ 2015 The Magic Flute (with Vaginal Davis), 80WSE Gallery. NYC ​ 2015 On Sabotage (screening), South London Gallery, London ​ GRANTS AND AWARDS 2019 A.I.R Artist Fellowship, A.I.R Gallery
    [Show full text]
  • Gun Industry Trade Association Resorts to Deceit After Cbs News 60 Minutes Documents Danger of Fifty Caliber Anti-Armor Rifles
    GUN INDUSTRY TRADE ASSOCIATION RESORTS TO DECEIT AFTER CBS NEWS 60 MINUTES DOCUMENTS DANGER OF FIFTY CALIBER ANTI-ARMOR RIFLES National Shooting Sports Foundation Seeks to Fend Off Oversight Of Ideal Terror Tool By Lying About Federal Records of Firearms Sales Stung by a CBS News 60 Minutes documentary that reported the looming danger of terrorist use of powerful 50 caliber anti-armor sniper rifles that are freely sold to civilians, the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), a gun industry trade association, has posted an egregiously dishonest misrepresentation regarding the lack of federal records kept on the sale of such firearms. The 60 Minutes report on January 9, 2005, accurately reported that no one in the federal government—much less the federal anti-terrorism establishment—knows who has these powerful long range anti-materiel sniping rifles.1 The 50 caliber anti- armor rifle can blast through armor, set bulk fuel stores on fire, breach chemical storage tanks, shoot down helicopters in flight, and destroy fully-loaded jet airliners on the ground—all from more than a mile away. The NSSF, desperate to fend off a growing state-led grassroots movement to regulate these weapons of war in the wake of indifference by the Bush administration and inaction by the majority leadership of the U.S. Congress, has taken out of context four words spoken by Violence Policy Center (VPC) Senior Policy Analyst Tom Diaz, and attempted by innuendo, half-truth, and outright lie to twist them into a “boldly false assertion.” This desperate smear withers under close examination. In the passage NSSF seeks to distort, 60 Minutes first correctly notes that the VPC’s objective, as articulated by Diaz, is to bring the anti-armor rifles under the existing federal National Firearms Act, under which similar weapons of war—such as machine guns, rockets, and grenades—are individually registered and all transfers recorded by the federal government.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Women's Law Center
    No. 20-843 ================================================================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION INC., ET AL., Petitioners, v. KEVIN P. B RUEN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT OF NEW YORK STATE POLICE, ET AL., Respondents. --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- BRIEF FOR THE INDEPENDENT WOMEN’S LAW CENTER AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING PETITIONERS --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- MARC H. ELLINGER JOHN M. REEVES STEPHANIE S. BELL Counsel of Record ELLINGER & ASSOCIATES, LLC REEVES LAW LLC 308 East High Street, 7733 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 300 Ste. 1100-1192 Jefferson City, MO 65101 St. Louis, MO 63105 Telephone: (573) 750-4100 Telephone: (314) 775-6985 Email: mellinger@ Email: reeves@ ellingerlaw.com reeveslawstl.com Email: sbell@ ellingerlaw.com Counsel for Amicus Curiae July 20, 2021 ================================================================================================================ i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................. i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................... ii INTEREST OF THE AMICUS CURIAE ......................... 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Stacey Pierce-Talsma DO, MS Medl, FNAOME Health Policy Fellowship 2014-2015
    Gun Violence: A Case for Supporting Research Stacey Pierce-Talsma DO, MS MEdL, FNAOME Health Policy Fellowship 2014-2015 INTRODUCTION HEALTH CARE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH GUN VIOLENCE INTENDED CONSEQUENCES & SUPPORTING STAKEHOLDERS CONCLUSION American taxpayers pay half a billion a year for gunshot-related Intended consequences of the bill Gun violence continues to be a public safety issue affecting the lives and health of First introduced by Rep. Kelly (D-IL-2) in 2013-2014 (113th Congress) as emergency department visits and hospital admissions according to the Collect data to improve gun safety and decrease gun violence and identify the population as well as directly contributing to health care costs, yet current HR 2456, the Bill “To require the Surgeon General of the Public Health Urban Institute. factors that may be addressed through federal or local initiatives to decrease data about gun violence is lacking. Service to submit to Congress an annual report on the effects of gun the impact of gun violence on society and to improve public safety. 2010 statistics demonstrated hospital costs totaled $669.2 million11 violence on public health” expired at the end of the Congressional 36,341 emergency room visits12 We can look to the example of research and Motor Vehicle Accident (MVA) data session. HR 224 was re-introduced in the 114th Congress (2015-2016) The American College of Physicians 25,024 hospitalizations due to firearm assault injuries12 which led to the implementation of injury prevention initiatives and a subsequent and was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.2 Recommends counselling on guns in the home, universal background Greater than 43% of gunshot victims are males ages 15-2412 decrease in MVA deaths.
    [Show full text]
  • Voting from the Rooftops
    VOTING FROM THE ROOFTOPS How the Gun Industry Armed Osama bin Laden, other Foreign and Domestic Terrorists, and Common Criminals with 50 Caliber Sniper Rifles Violence Policy Center The Violence Policy Center is a national non-profit educational organization that conducts research and public education on firearms violence and provides information and analysis to policymakers, journalists, grassroots advocates, and the general public. The Center examines the role of firearms in America, analyzes trends and patterns in firearms violence, and works to develop policies to reduce gun- related death and injury. This study was authored by VPC Senior Policy Analyst Tom Diaz. This study was funded with the support of The David Bohnett Foundation, The Center on Crime, Communities & Culture of the Open Society Institute/Funders’ Collaborative for Gun Violence Prevention, The George Gund Foundation, The Joyce Foundation, and The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Past studies released by the Violence Policy Center include: • Shot Full of Holes: Deconstructing John Ashcroft’s Second Amendment (July 2001) • Hispanics and Firearms Violence (May 2001) • Poisonous Pastime: The Health Risks of Target Ranges and Lead to Children, Families, and the Environment (May 2001) • Where’d They Get Their Guns?—An Analysis of the Firearms Used in High-Profile Shootings, 1963 to 2001 (April 2001) • Every Handgun Is Aimed at You: The Case for Banning Handguns (March 2001) • From Gun Games to Gun Stores: Why the Firearms Industry Wants Their Video Games on
    [Show full text]
  • F:\Assault Weapons\On Target Brady Rebuttal\AW Final Text for PDF.Wpd
    A Further Examination of Data Contained in the Study On Target Regarding Effects of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban Violence Policy Center The Violence Policy Center (VPC) is a national non-profit educational organization that conducts research and public education on firearms violence and provides information and analysis to policymakers, journalists, advocates, and the general public. The Center examines the role of firearms in America, analyzes trends and patterns in firearms violence, and works to develop policies to reduce gun-related death and injury. Past studies released by the VPC include: C Really Big Guns, Even Bigger Lies: The Violence Policy Center’s Response to the Fifty Caliber Institute’s Misrepresentations (March 2004) • Illinois—Land of Post-Ban Assault Weapons (March 2004) • When Men Murder Women: An Analysis of 2001 Homicide Data (September 2003) • Bullet Hoses—Semiautomatic Assault Weapons: What Are They? What’s So Bad About Them? (May 2003) • “Officer Down”—Assault Weapons and the War on Law Enforcement (May 2003) • Firearms Production in America 2002 Edition—A Listing of Firearm Manufacturers in America with Production Histories Broken Out by Firearm Type and Caliber (March 2003) • “Just Like Bird Hunting”—The Threat to Civil Aviation from 50 Caliber Sniper Rifles (January 2003) • Sitting Ducks—The Threat to the Chemical and Refinery Industry from 50 Caliber Sniper Rifles (August 2002) • License to Kill IV: More Guns, More Crime (June 2002) • American Roulette: The Untold Story of Murder-Suicide in the United States (April 2002) • The U.S. Gun Industry and Others Unknown—Evidence Debunking the Gun Industry’s Claim that Osama bin Laden Got His 50 Caliber Sniper Rifles from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Should Mexico Adopt Permissive Gun Policies: Lessons from the United States
    Esta revista forma parte del acervo de la Biblioteca Jurídica Virtual del Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM http://www.juridicas.unam.mx/ https://biblio.juridicas.unam.mx/bjv https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/ http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2019.1.13127 exican M Review aw New Series L V O L U M E XI Number 2 SHOULD MEXICO ADOPT PERMISSIVE GUN POLICIES: LESSONS FROM THE UNITED STATES Eugenio WEIGEND VARGAS* David PÉREZ ESPARZA** ABSTRACT: After a recent increase in violence, policy makers and advocates in Mexico have proposed new firearm legislation that would shift Mexican gun policies towards a more permissive approach. Following the argument of ‘self- defense’, these initiatives would facilitate citizens’ access to guns by allowing them to carry firearms in automobiles and businesses. These initiatives have been developed without a deep analysis of the effects of permissive gun laws. In this article, the authors present an assessment of what Mexican policymak- ers and advocates should be aware of regarding permissive gun laws using the example of the United States, the nation with the highest rate of gun ownership in the world and where these policies are already in effect. KEYWORDS: Permissive Gun Laws, Self-Defense, National Rifle Association, Second Amendment, Gun Violence. RESUMEN: Ante el reciente incremento de violencia en México, algunos to- madores de decisión y grupos ciudadanos han comenzado a debatir propuestas legislativas que modificarían la política de armas en México hacia un enfoque más permisivo. Bajo el argumento de ‘legítima defensa’, estas iniciativas, por ejemplo, facilitarían el acceso a armas de fuego a los ciudadanos al permitírseles portar armas en automóviles y negocios.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Youth Gun Violence: an Overview of Programs and Initiatives
    T O EN F J TM U R ST U.S. Department of Justice A I P C E E D B O J C S F A V Office of Justice Programs F M O I N A C I J S R E BJ G O OJJ DP O F PR Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention JUSTICE Reducing Youth Gun Violence: An Overview of Programs and Initiatives PROGRAM REPORT Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) was established by the President and Con- gress through the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (JJDP) Act of 1974, Public Law 93–415, as amended. Located within the Office of Justice Programs of the U.S. Department of Justice, OJJDP’s goal is to provide national leadership in addressing the issues of juvenile delinquency and improving juvenile justice. OJJDP sponsors a broad array of research, program, and training initiatives to improve the juvenile justice system as a whole, as well as to benefit individual youth-serving agencies. These initiatives are carried out by seven components within OJJDP, described below. Research and Program Development Division Information Dissemination Unit informs individuals develops knowledge on national trends in juvenile and organizations of OJJDP initiatives; disseminates delinquency; supports a program for data collection information on juvenile justice, delinquency preven- and information sharing that incorporates elements tion, and missing children; and coordinates program of statistical and systems development; identifies planning efforts within OJJDP. The unit’s activities how delinquency develops and the best methods include publishing research and statistical reports, for its prevention, intervention, and treatment; and bulletins, and other documents, as well as overseeing analyzes practices and trends in the juvenile justice the operations of the Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse.
    [Show full text]
  • America Under the Gun a 50-State Analysis of Gun Violence and Its Link to Weak State Gun Laws
    CAP ILLUSTRATION/ISTOCK PHOTO ILLUSTRATION/ISTOCK CAP America Under the Gun A 50-State Analysis of Gun Violence and Its Link to Weak State Gun Laws Arkadi Gerney, Chelsea Parsons, and Charles Posner April 2013 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG America Under the Gun A 50-State Analysis of Gun Violence and Its Link to Weak State Gun Laws Arkadi Gerney, Chelsea Parsons, and Charles Posner April 2013 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 3 10 indicators of gun violence 27 The link between high levels of gun violence and weak state gun laws 35 Conclusion 37 About the authors 39 Methodology 42 Endnotes 45 Appendix: Fact sheets on the 10 states with the highest levels of gun violence 45 Alaska 47 Alabama 49 Arkansas 51 Arizona 53 Georgia 55 Louisiana 57 Missouri 59 Mississippi 61 New Mexico 63 South Carolina Introduction and summary In the aftermath of mass shootings and other gun-related tragedies, there is often a surge of interest on the part of community leaders, social-science researchers, and elected officials to root out the causes of gun violence in an effort to prevent such tragedies from occurring again. Any study into the causes of gun violence is necessarily complicated, however, as there are innumerable factors that contribute to the nature and prevalence of gun-related violence in any community. Despite this complex web of factors that influence the rate of gun violence, this report finds a clear link between high levels of gun violence and weak state gun laws. Across the key indicators of gun violence that we analyzed, the 10 states with the weakest gun laws collectively have an aggregate level of gun violence that is more than twice as high—104 percent higher, in fact—than the 10 states with the strongest gun laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilian Sales of Military Sniper Rifles (May 1999), P
    1. Violence Policy Center, One Shot, One Kill: Civilian Sales of Military Sniper Rifles (May 1999), p. 2. 2. Violence Policy Center, One Shot, One Kill: Civilian Sales of Military Sniper Rifles (May 1999), p. 8. 3. David A. Shlapak and Alan Vick, RAND, “Check Six begins on the ground”: Responding to the Evolving Ground Threat to U.S. Air Force Bases (1995), p. 51. 4. Transcript of trial, United States of America v. Usama bin Laden, et al., United States District Court, Southern District of New York, February 14, 2001, pp. 18- 19; “Al-Qaeda’s Business Empire,” Jane’s Intelligence Review (August 1, 2001). 5. Toby Harnden, Bandit Country: The IRA and South Armagh (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1999), pp. 354-55; “Arsenal Which Threatens Peace,” Daily Record (Scotland), 3 July 2001, p. 9. 6. See, e.g., “Provos ‘have a second supergun in armoury,’ Belfast Telegraph, 4 November 1999. 7. “The Ultimate Jihad Challenge,” downloaded from http://www.sakina.fsbusiness.co.uk/home.html on September 24, 2001; “Britain Tracing Trail of One More Jihad Group,” The New York Times on the Web, 4 October 2001; “British Muslims seek terror training in US,” Sunday Telegraph (London), 21 May 2000, p.5. 8. See, e.g., advertisement for Storm Mountain Training Center in The Accurate Rifle (April 2001), p.27; “Killer Course: The Men in Storm Mountain’s Sniper Class Don’t All Have Their Sights Set on the Same Thing,” The Washington Post, 13 July 2000, p. C1; “Best of the Best; Arms Training Site Aims to Lure Gun Enthusiasts, Soldiers,” The Virginian-Pilot (Norfolk), 27 September 1998, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 18-280 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK AND THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT-LICENSE DIVISION, Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR AMICI CURIAE BRADY AND TEAM ENOUGH IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY JONATHAN E. LOWY PAUL R.Q. WOLFSON T. TANYA SCHARDT Counsel of Record BRADY DREW VAN DENOVER* 840 First St., NE WILMER CUTLER PICKERING Suite 400 HALE AND DORR LLP Washington, DC 20002 1875 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (202) 370-8100 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 663-6390 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ..................................... 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ........................................................................ 1 ARGUMENT ....................................................................... 4 I. THE COURT SHOULD AVOID DECIDING THE CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS PRESENTED .............. 4 II. THE SECOND AMENDMENT PRESERVES THE STATES’ POWER AND OBLIGATION TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC FROM GUN VIOLENCE ...................................................................... 8 A. The Second Amendment Is Unique Among Constitutional Rights In Its Inherent Risk To Human Life ............................ 8 B. The Nation’s Constitutional Structure And History Presuppose Government’s Paramount Duty To Protect Public Safety ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Artivism in Exposing the Sexist-Ableist Nexus in Campus Rape Culture
    Acts of Public Survival: The Role of Artivism in Exposing the Sexist-Ableist Nexus in Campus Rape Culture Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Tess Elizabeth Cumpstone, MA Graduate Program in Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies The Ohio State University 2018 Thesis Committee: Dr. Guisela Latorre, Advisor Dr. Margaret Price Copyright by Tess Elizabeth Cumpstone 2018 2 Abstract “Acts of Public Survival” analyzes how community-based, anti-rape art projects on college campuses challenge the sexist-ableist rhetorical maneuvers that pathologize survivors and position them as outliers requiring special treatment. This violent rhetoric is evident in messages that have been circulated by prominent public figures, as well as entrenched in the policies and administrative responses addressing sexual violence on college campuses. The impact of such rhetoric is the perpetuation and affirmation of the sub-humanization of survivors of sexual trauma. In this thesis, I put disability studies scholarship in conversation with feminist theories on sexual violence and public art in order to highlight the interconnected history of sexism-ableism in the U.S. and the function of anti-rape art projects as artivist practices on college campuses. Specifically, I will be considering Duke University’s Breaking Out Campaign, the University of Chicago’s Clothesline Project, and Emma Sulkowicz’s Mattress Performance (undertaken at Columbia University). I use grounded theory and discourse analysis to interpret digital articles written in reaction to the art projects and to track three common trends in sexist-ableist campus community responses: the narrative of special treatment, the narrative of pathology, and the narrative of willful ignorance.
    [Show full text]