DOCSLIB.ORG

Settlor, Trustee Or Beneficiary of a Trust… in the Courts of the Contracting State in Which the Trust Is Domiciled »

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Settlor, Trustee Or Beneficiary of a Trust… in the Courts of the Contracting State in Which the Trust Is Domiciled » Conference Presentation Some Recent Case Law On Private International Law of Trusts ROMANO, Gian Paolo Reference ROMANO, Gian Paolo. Some Recent Case Law On Private International Law of Trusts. In: STEP Lausanne, 2016 Conference, Lausanne, 3 May 2016, 2016, p. 1-22 Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:135147 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 Survey of Recent Cases on Private International Law of Trusts Gian Paolo Romano, Lausanne, 3 May 2016 Good morning everybody. And thank you for your warm welcome. Let me thank Guillaume Grisel for his generous invitation. It’s always nice to be back in Lausanne. When Guillaume asked me to choose a topic for today’s conference, I thought it might be worth looking at some cases generated by the Hague Trust Convention of 1985. Part of the reason is because the Swiss cantonal courts and the Federal Tri- bunal had to deal with this Convention repeatedly over the last few years. I am particularly thinking about the famous – or infamous – Rybolovlev decision that sparked some criticism and concern. And so… why not have a look at how courts in other jurisdictions grapple with the same rules, possibly to receive some guidance? The second reason is that the Convention has a strong bond with Switzer- land, this part of Switzerland in particular, the drafter of the Explanatory Report being the late Professor von Overbeck who passed away one month ago, aged 91. And celebrating one of his achievements is, I believe, a way to pay tribute to this « old grand man »’s tireless work and outstanding service to the Swiss as well as the international community. Not only was Professor von Overbeck the founding father and first director of the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law in Lausanne, but he also was throughout his career a champion of the dialogue among nations and the mutual respect for their legal values. And the Hague Trust Convention, in an effort to build bridges between the civilian and the common law traditions, remains a testament to his beliefs and his leadership. 1 *** Now, the Trust Convention is an applicable law convention. It does not deal with jurisdiction. When I started working on my speech (that is over the week-end), I rea- lised it would be good to also cover some jurisdictional cases. Let me remind that the Lugano Convention and the Brussels Ia Regulation provide for specific trust-related rules on jurisdiction. And the Swiss Private International Law Act also lays down some uni- quely crafted provisions in this regard. And so the first part of my talk – which is not reflected in the title I pro- posed some months ago (I hope you won’t be mind this inconsistency) – will be addressing some challenging questions as to jurisdiction, while the second part will be dealing with applicable law. *** Let me read Article 5(6) of the Lugano Convention: « A person domiciled in a Contracting State may… be sued… as settlor, trustee or beneficiary of a trust… in the courts of the Contracting State in which the trust is domiciled ». Now this text raises a number of intricate problems... …some of which were evidenced by a 2008 English case, Gomez v. Go- mez-Monche Vives. Alfredo Gonzalez Diez created, in 1984, a trust by transferring to a Jersey company a substantial shareholding in Gonzalez Byass & Company Li- mited… … a Cayman Island company, which happens to be the holding of the well- known producer of sherry. English law was expressly stated to govern the trust. 2 The settlor died in 1991, intestate and domiciled in Spain. The beneficiaries under the trust were three sons. The settlor’s surviving spouse, and mother of the beneficiaries, a Spanish domiciliary, had designated herself to be « Appointor » based on a fidu- ciary power in the trust deed. At the time of the proceedings, a BVI trustee had replaced the original Jersey trustee. And a Liechtenstein company was responsible for the day-to-day adminis- tration of the trust. The beneficiaries started proceedings against their mother as well the trus- tees… …claiming that the trustees had, in breach of trust, paid to her capital and income. They contended that their mother had to reimburse those monies. And the beneficiaries also sought to have their mother removed as an ap- pointor. The defendants, in particular their mother, raised lack of jurisdiction of the English court. *** In order to determine whether Article 5(6) made it possible for her to be sued in England, the first issue was: Where was the trust domiciled? There is no common definition of « domicile » of a trust in Brussels I and Lugano. Both instruments refer to the private international law of the forum. According to the 2001 Order – that has implemented Brussels I in the UK – a trust has its domicile in « the system of law with which the trust has its closest and most real connection ». 3 Now, English law had been expressly chosen to govern the trust. However, there was no geographical connection between the trust and England : …the place of residence of the trustees was not England, the trust was not administered in England, nor were any of the beneficiaries in England… Nonetheless, both the High Court and the Court of Appeal were satisfied that the trust was domiciled in England on the ground that (quote) « the connection between a trust and its proper law is in every sense real and close ». I am not sure whether the conclusion would have been the same under Ar- ticle 21(3) of the Swiss Act… … which relies on the « place of administration » as designated by the set- tlor or, in the absence of such designation, the « place of effective adminis- tration ». The initial place of administration was probably Jersey and the place of ad- ministration at the time when the facts occurred was probably Liechten- stein. But quite apart from this, the equation « domicile is in the State whose law was chosen by the settlor » is something of unsettling. This would mean that any trust governed by English law created anywhere in the world may trigger jurisdiction of the English courts ; and… when the defendant is domiciled in a Lugano or Brussels I State, the English courts will have no power to stay based on forum non conveniens. I wonder whether this is really a sensible solution. *** The second issue the court faced with was the capacity in which the bene- ficiaries sued the surviving spouse. 4 With respect to the first claim, the High Court had concluded that she was not sued as a « beneficiary ». That’s because the clamaints themselves argued that she was a not bene- ficiary, as consequence of which she had to return the monies she wrong- fully received. On appeal, Lord Collins disagreed. « She is sued – he said – because she has been treated as a beneficiary by the trustees and by herself ». So Article 5(6) applied to the first claim against her. With respect to the first claim, she was amenable to jurisdiction in En- gland. *** The final question was whether the fact that she was also sued as an « ap- pointor » triggered Article 5(6) also with respect to the second claim. As we’ve seen, this Article mentions « the settlor, the beneficiaries and the trustees », but not the appointor nor the protector. Which is why the High Court held that an « appointor » does not rank as a « trustee ». The Court of Appeal approved, based on the need to interpret restrictively interpretation the special heads of jurisdiction listed in Article 5. Now, back in 1978, when the language of Article 5(6) was negotiated, there was no practice of using « appointors » or « protectors ». Nowadays – as you know much better than me – « protectors » may be granted extensive fiduciary powers, such as to replace trustees, change the accounting currency, change the law governing the trust, add or delete beneficiares… 5 And so, I am wondering whether one should not add the « protectors » to the list of the defendants that may be sued before the courts of the domicile of the trust. Article 149b of the Swiss Act encompasses – I believe – lawsuits filed against the « appointor » as covered by the expression « affaires relevant du droit des trusts ». So the drafting of the « LDIP » in this regard seems to be superior over the the Lugano Convention. *** Another case that posed a wide range of issues, including some novel ones, made all its way up to the Privy Council. The trust deed in question was entered into by Lady Crociani, the settlor. The original trustees were herself, resident in Mexico, and Bank American Trust, a Bahamas corporation. The beneficiaries included Lady Crociani’s two daughters, Princess Camil- la de Bourbon des Des Deux Siciles and her sister Cristiana. Clause 15 of the deed provided that (quote) « the validity and construction of the Agreement.. shall be governed by the law of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas… ». Clause 12 incorporated what is sometimes referred to as « shifting jurisdic- tional clause ». Some of you may be familiar with it. Clause 12 essentially provided for the absolutely discretionary power of the initial trustees (quote)… « to resign and appoint a new trustee outside the jurisdiction and… decla- re that the trusts thereof shall be read and take effect according to the laws of the country of the residence or incorporation of such new Trustee… » The Clause went on to say that 6 « thereafter the rights of all persons involved… shall be subject to the ex- clusive jurisdiction of and construed only according to the laws of the said country, which shall become the forum for the administration of the trusts ».
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Switzerland to Ratify Hague Trust Convention
    Switzerland to ratify Hague Trust Convention The Swiss Federal Justice Department is inviting comments on its latest draft legislation covering Switzerland’s by Richard Pease ratification of the Hague Trust Convention. Its arguments are outlined below. Lenz & Staehelin Geneva, Switzerland On 20th October the Swiss Federal Justice decisions. However, the Justice Department does Department announced further details of its not consider it appropriate to follow Professor plan to recommend to the Swiss parliament an Thévenoz’s recommendations in this respect, early ratification of the Hague Trust and has decided to restrict the new proposals to Convention. In December 2003, an earlier the specific area of trusts. The most important consultation paper was circulated to various of these proposals are summarised below. “... the resulting professional bodies (including STEP draft legislation has Switzerland) and other interested parties, who ADDITIONS TO THE PRIVATE Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/tandt/article/11/1/17/1711135 by guest on 29 September 2021 now been circulated responded by making comments and INTERNATIONAL LAW ACT suggestions on the preliminary draft proposal Four new sections would be added to the Private for wider aimed at adapting Swiss law to permit full International Law Act (“PILA”). consultation.” statutory recognition in Switzerland of the The court of jurisdiction which would be incidences of the trust relationship. Those competent to rule on the legal effect, the comments have been largely incorporated in the administration, modification or termination of a Justice Department’s latest proposals, and the trust created by a legal act (thus excluding resulting draft legislation has now been constructive trusts) would be that designated (in circulated for wider consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Netherlands International Estate Planning Guide Private Client Tax Committee
    The Netherlands International Estate Planning Guide Private Client Tax Committee Contacts: Dirk-Jan Maasland Rogier Ploeg Loyens & Loeff The Netherlands [email protected] [email protected] Updated 4/2021 Table of Contents I. Wills and disability planning documents ..................................................................... 4 A. Will formalities and enforceability of foreign wills .................................................. 4 1. The form of last will and testaments ................................................................ 4 2. Codicils............................................................................................................ 4 3. Post-death variations ...................................................................................... 4 4. The Hague Testamentary Dispositions Convention ........................................ 4 B. Will substitutes (revocable trusts or entities) ........................................................ 4 C. Powers of attorney, directives and similar disability documents ........................... 4 II. Estate administration ................................................................................................. 5 A. Overview of administration procedures ................................................................ 5 1. Administration of the estate ............................................................................. 5 2. Certificate of inheritance ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reference
    Book Le droit de suite et sa reconnaissance selon la Convention de La Haye sur les trusts : "tracing" en droit civil suisse PANNATIER KESSLER, Delphine Abstract Aux frontières du droit des trusts, des droits réels, du droit des obligations, du droit bancaire et du droit international privé, cette thèse étudie la question très controversée de la reconnaissance en Suisse du droit de suite (tracing), selon la Convention de La Haye sur le droit applicable au trust et à sa reconnaissance. Elle démontre que le droit de suite, action du droit des trusts de nature réelle proche de la rei vindicatio, doit être reconnu en Suisse moyennant quelques adaptations, notamment dans les cas où des avoirs bancaires ou des titres intermédiés sont visés. En plus de l’examen des aspects dogmatiques, la thèse apporte aux praticiens des solutions concrètes de fond et de procédure en vue de faciliter la mise en œuvre du droit de suite en Suisse. Reference PANNATIER KESSLER, Delphine. Le droit de suite et sa reconnaissance selon la Convention de La Haye sur les trusts : "tracing" en droit civil suisse. Genève : Schulthess, 2011, 407 p. Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:97796 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 Chapitre 3 : Le droit communautaire des placements collectifs de capitaux 5 Préface 学問に近道なし “Dans la recherche, pas de raccourcis” (proverbe japonais) Pour ma recherche aux frontières de différents domaines du droit, sans guide sur le chemin escarpé, le passage du col n’aurait pas été possible. Je tiens d’abord à remercier mes deux directeurs de thèse, les Professeurs Luc Thévenoz et Bénédict Foëx de l’Université de Genève, de leur ap- pui, de leurs précieux conseils et des perspectives qu’ils m’ont ouvertes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1923 Geneva Protocol on Arbitration Clauses, 120 1952 Arrest Convention, 134, 135 EU Rules, 141 Exclusions, 136 Recognition
    2731 Index 1923 Geneva Protocol on Arbitration Anti- suit injunctions, 83, 84, 85 Clauses, 120 Forum non conveniens, 798, 800, 802, 803, 804, 1952 Arrest Convention, 134, 135 805 EU rules, 141 Injunction, 928 Exclusions, 136 Legal aid, 1088 Recognition and enforcement of foreign Mediation, 1250 judgments, 139 Online dispute resolution, 1314 Scope of application, 135 Public international law and private international Substantive rules, 136 law, 1451 1993 Maritime Liens and Mortgages Service of documents, 1628 Convention, 134 Accessory connecting factors, 34, 448 1999 Arrest Convention, 134 Culpa in contrahendo, 495 EU rules, 140 Renvoi, 1544 Exclusions, 136 Accessory connection Flag, 136 Connecting factor, 448 Jurisdiction, foundations, 139 Negotiorum gestio, 1303 Liability of owner, 137 Prescription, 1371 Party autonomy, 139 Torts, 1712, 1714 Recognition and enforcement of foreign Unjust enrichment (restitution), 1811 judgments, 139 Accident Scope of application, 135 Carriage of passengers, 271, 274, 275, 276 Substantive rules, 136 Accident compensation New Zealand, 2374 Absence Accidents at sea Absence (disappearance, presumed Maritime torts, 1220 death) 1, 2, 3, 4 Account Preservation Order Regulation Brussels I (Convention and Regulation), 4 Brussels I (Convention and Regulation), 225 China, 3 Civil and commercial matters, 348 Concept, 1 Account- payee- only cheques, 296 Connecting factor, 4 Account Preservation Order Regulation Domicile, habitual residence and establishment, 3, Attachment of bank accounts, 681 5 Accursius Function,
    [Show full text]
  • MALTA 21-23 October 2010 Seminar Private Clients Trusts Under Attack
    MALTA 21-23 October 2010 Seminar Private Clients Trusts Under Attack SEMINAR REPORT Reporters Delphine Pannatier Kessler, Bär & Karrer AG Andrea Dorjee-Good, Schellenberg Wittmer ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE DES JEUNES AVOCATS – INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF YOUNG LAWYERS Association sans but lucratif – Non-Profit Association – Siège: Luxembourg (Grand-Duché de Luxembourg) Office: Avenue Louis Lepoutre 59/20 – BE-1050 Brussels – T. +32 2 347 33 34 – F. +32 2 347 55 22 e-mail: [email protected] – www.aija.org Malta report number 2.doc FRIDAY MORNING, 22 OCTOBER 2010 TRUSTS UNDER ATTACK FROM SPOUSES CLAIMING ON DIVORCE Speakers: Eliza Hebditch, Farrer & Co LLP, London; David Cadin, Bedell Cristin, Jersey; Ziva Robertson, Withers LLP; London; Agnès Proton, Cabinet Proton, Cannes Eliza Hebditch, Farrer & Co: Attacks on trusts in the English divorce courts - London is the divorce capital of the world (Presumption of equality; nothing is off the table, including separate property; inclusion of trusts' assets in the calculation) - Suspicion of English family judges against trusts - Disclosure about trusts: • Family judge can order the trustee to provide information • Letters of Request to foreign courts • Look at the pattern of distributions, letter of wishes, all documents - Is a trust a nuptial settlement or a non nuptial settlement? • No statutory definition, issue is whether marriage was taken into account when settling the trust. • Orders directly against the trustees (direct attacks) only if nuptial settlement (order capital or income out of the trust/transfer of property/removal or appointment of trustee) • In non nuptial settlement: Judicious encouragement (indirect attacks) - Sham trust: Not a valid trust at all (Minwalla case) - Transaction to defeat the other spouse's claims: Transfer not valid if 3 years before divorce with intent to deprive the other spouse.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Succession Regulation and the Arbitration of Trust Disputes
    A12_STRONG (DO NOT DELETE) 6/28/2018 11:11 PM The European Succession Regulation and the Arbitration of Trust Disputes S.I. Strong* ABSTRACT: Over the last few decades, U.S. citizens have become increasingly mobile, with significant numbers of individuals living, working, and investing abroad. Estate planning has become equally international, generating ever-larger numbers of cross-border succession cases. While these sorts of developments are welcome, they require lawyers to appreciate and anticipate the various ways that the laws of different jurisdictions can interact. One of the most important recent developments in international succession law comes out of the European Union. While the European Succession Regulation may initially appear applicable only to nationals of E.U. Member States, U.S. citizens can also be affected by its provisions. This Article analyzes the interaction between the Regulation and trust arbitration, which has become increasingly popular in various U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. In so doing, the Article discusses how trust arbitration furthers the goals of the Regulation and how individual provisions in the Regulation may support or restrict the possibility of arbitration of trust-related disputes. I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 2206 II. TRUST ARBITRATION AROUND THE WORLD .............................. 2207 III. THE REGULATION ..................................................................... 2210 A. THE REGULATION AND PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Switzerland Ratifies the Hague Trust Convention
    NEWSLETTER April 2007 S CHELLENBERG W ITTMER Attorneys-at-Law Switzerland ratifies the Hague Trust Convention The Hague Trust Convention will come into effect on 1st July segregation between the assets in trust and the trustee’s patri- 2007 in Switzerland. Simultaneously, some adaptations of mony in Swiss debt enforcement procedures and for a specific Swiss law will enter into force. Thus, recognition of trusts in debt collection procedure against the assets in trust. Switzerland will be governed by predictable rules and more legal security will be given in this area. In order to further This newsletter summarizes these developments, by focusing improve the trust’s status, the Swiss Tax Conference intends on its practical consequences, and outlines the anticipated to publish a directive setting the rules for harmonizing the developments regarding taxation of trusts. taxation of trusts. It is however not clear yet when such 2 Characteristics of a trust directive will actually be issued. Unlike a foundation, a trust is not a separate legal entity; neither 1 Introduction does it constitute an organized patrimony. Rather, a trust represents a separate and autonomous unit of assets. From a The trust has its roots in the Anglo-Saxon legal system. A trust private law perspective, the trustee is the owner of the assets constitutes a legal relationship further to which assets are in trust, even though he must segregate these from his own transferred to one or several persons (trustees) who must patrimony and manage them in accordance with the purpose manage and dispose of them in accordance with the purposes or in favour of the beneficiaries defined by the settlor.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong International Estate Planning Guide Individual Tax and Private Client Committee
    Hong Kong International Estate Planning Guide Individual Tax and Private Client Committee Contact: Tze-wei Ng Stephenson Harwood, Hong Kong [email protected] Updated 5/2021 Table of Contents I. Wills and disability planning documents ................................................................. 1 A. Will formalities .......................................................................................... 1 B. Enforceability of foreign wills ....................................................................... 2 C. Will substitutes .......................................................................................... 2 1. Joint tenancy......................................................................................... 2 2. Will trust/testamentary trust ................................................................... 3 3. Standby trust ........................................................................................ 3 D. Powers of attorney, directives and similar disability documents ......................... 3 1. Powers of attorney ................................................................................. 3 2. Advance directive .................................................................................. 6 3. Legal guardianship ................................................................................. 7 II. Estate administration .......................................................................................... 8 A. Overview of administration procedures .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ITLA 2019 4 Offprint
    International Trust Laws and Analysis 2019-4 By William Byrnes & Robert J. Munro Texas A&M University School of Law In the Trust Law section, this supplement contains updates to the chapters on Andorra, Anguilla, Austria, Bahamas, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Dominica, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Hong Kong, Isle of Man, Macau, Mauritius, Seychelles and Switzerland. In the Company Law section, this supplement contains updates to the chapters on Anguilla, Brazil, Greece, Pakistan and the charts on Brazil. ANDORRA This chapter is up-to-date as of August 2019 Trust Laws – Suppl. 4 (2019) AND i ANDORRA AND ii Trust Laws – Suppl. 4 (2019) ANALYSIS ANDORRA ANALYSIS OF TRUST LAWS* After 700 years of being dominated by two co-princes, the French President and the Spanish Bishop of Seo de Urgel, the 180-square mile nation of Andorra wedged between two powerful neighbors in the Pyrenees has progressed towards greater self-rule with the adoption of its first constitution in 1993. This historic document affirms Andorra’s right to have a parliamentary system of government having as its chief executive a Cap de Govern (Head of State). During the period of princely rule going back to the Middle Ages, Andorran trusts have been used as an important vehicle in channeling assets under the civil law concept of fideicomis. Fideicomis is the Roman-origin word for what in common law countries is often referred to as a trust. It is the vehicle or entity through which a physical or legal person receives certain goods by gift with instructions to distribute these assets to third-party beneficiaries according to pre-established terms and conditions [Dret Civil Vigent a Catalunya (1923), §453, ¶100].
    [Show full text]
  • Trusts in Common Law and Civil Law
    EVA HEUP TRUSTS IN COMMON LAW AND CIVIL LAW LLM RESEARCH PAPER LAWS 533: CIVIL LAW FOR COMMON LAWYERS FACULTY OF LAW 2016 2 Trusts in Common Law and Civil Law TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 4 II COMMON LAW TRUSTS ......................................................................................... 4 A Historical Origins ......................................................................................................... 4 B Definition ...................................................................................................................... 5 C Core Elements .............................................................................................................. 6 1 Creation ......................................................................................................... 6 2 Split of ownership ......................................................................................... 7 III TRUSTS AND CIVIL LAW ....................................................................................... 8 A Roman Law ................................................................................................................... 8 1 The Roman fideicommissum ....................................................................... 8 2 Roman law as inspiration for the emergence of common law trusts? ..... 9 B Clash with Major Property Law Principles ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Il Trust in Italia E Nella Repubblica Di San Marino. Lo Sham Trust
    DIPARTIMENTO DI GIURISPRUDENZA Cattedra di Diritto privato Comparato IL TRUST IN ITALIA E NELLA REPUBBLICA DI SAN MARINO. LO SHAM TRUST RELATORE Chiar. ma Prof.ssa Barbara Santa De Donno CANDIDATO Anastasia Matilde Freschi Matr. 122873 CORRELATORE Chiar. mo Prof. Domenico Benincasa ANNO ACCADEMICO 2017/2018 1 INDICE INTRODUZIONE p. 4 PREMESSA IL TRUST: INQUADRAMENTO DELL’ISTITUTO 1. Origini storiche p. 7 2. Definizione p. 9 3. Principali funzioni p. 11 CAPITOLO I IL TRUST IN ITALIA 1.1 La Convenzione de L'Aja p. 15 1.2 Il riconoscimento del trust in Italia p. 20 1.3 L'istituzione del trust in Italia p. 24 1.4 L'art 2645 ter del codice civile italiano e il trust: due istituti a confronto p. 27 1.4.1 La pubblicità del trust in Italia p. 31 1.5 Il trust e gli istituti analoghi dell’ordinamento italiano p. 35 1.5.1 Trust e negozio fiduciario p. 35 1.5.2 Trust e mandato p. 38 1.5.3 Trust, fondo patrimoniale e patto di famiglia p. 40 1.5.4 Trust e affidamento fiduciario p. 43 2 CAPITOLO II IL TRUST NELLA REPUBBLICA DI SAN MARINO 2.1 Il sistema sammarinese delle fonti del diritto p. 46 2.2 La legge sul trust di San Marino del 1° marzo 2010, n. 42 p. 49 2.2.1 La legge sul trust di San Marino del 1° marzo 2010, n. 42 ed il modello di trust internazionale p. 68 2.3 La legge sull’affidamento fiduciario di San Marino del 1° marzo 2010, n.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vagyonvédelem Jogi Eszközeinek Legújabb Nemzetközi Tendenciái
    dc_1475_17 Sándor István A vagyonvédelem jogi eszközeinek legújabb nemzetközi tendenciái MTA doktori értekezés Budapest, 2017. 1 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) dc_1475_17 Tartalom A dolgozatban alkalmazott rövidítések feloldása 6 Előszó 8 I. A kutatás célja és módszertana 9 1. A kutatás célja 9 2. A kutatás módszertana és keretei 11 2.1. Módszertani kérdések 11 2.2. A kutatás keretei 12 3. Alapvetések és kiindulási pontok 14 4. Alapfogalmak 18 4.1. A trust szó jelentéstartalmai 18 4.2. A trustjogviszonnyal kapcsolatos főbb fogalmak 22 II. A trust és ahhoz hasonló jogintézmények szabályainak háttere 26 1. A trust a common law jogrendszerű országokban 27 1.1. Európa 28 1.1.1. Nagy-Britannia 28 1.1.2. Egyéb európai országok 29 1.2. Amerika 30 1.2.1. Az Amerikai Egyesült Államok 30 1.2.2. Kanada 32 1.2.3. Közép-amerikai országok 32 1.3. Ausztrália és Óceánia 35 1.3.1. Ausztrália 35 1.3.2. Új-Zéland 35 1.3.3. Az óceániai szigetek 36 1.4. Common law jogrendszerű országok Ázsiában 37 1.5. Afrika 38 2. Vegyes jogrendszerű államok 40 2.1. Dél-Afrika 40 2.2. Louisiana 41 2.3. Máltai Köztársaság 43 2.4. Québec 43 2.5. Skócia 44 2.6. A Csatorna-szigetek 46 2.7. Egyéb vegyes jogrendszerű országok 47 3. Trusthoz hasonló jogintézmények a civiljogi jogrendszerekben 48 3.1. Európa 48 3.1.1. Liechtenstein 52 3.1.2. Luxemburg 53 3.1.3. Franciaország 54 3.1.4. San Marino 54 3.1.5. Oroszország 55 2 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) dc_1475_17 3.1.6.
    [Show full text]