Chromosomal Contact Permits Transcription Between Coregulated Genes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Chromosomal Contact Permits Transcription between Coregulated Genes Stephanie Fanucchi,1 Youtaro Shibayama,1 Shaun Burd,1 Marc S. Weinberg,3,4 and Musa M. Mhlanga1,2,* 1Gene Expression and Biophysics Group, Synthetic Biology Emerging Research Area, Biosciences Unit, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, Gauteng 0001, South Africa 2Unidade de Biofı´sica e Expressa˜ o Gene´ tica, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, 1649-028 Portugal 3Antiviral Gene Therapy Research Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng 2193, South Africa 4Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.051 SUMMARY 2012). These highly sensitive assays can target either DNA or nascent mRNA and have revealed the colocalization between Transcription of coregulated genes occurs in the FISH foci in a fraction of the population (Schoenfelder et al., context of long-range chromosomal contacts that 2010; Papantonis et al., 2010). This suggests that a subset of form multigene complexes. Such contacts and cells within the population may be enriched for specific chromo- transcription are lost in knockout studies of tran- somal interactions. Chromosomes are large and constrained in scription factors and structural chromatin proteins. their ability to roam the entire nuclear volume (Strickfaden To ask whether chromosomal contacts are required et al., 2010; Barbieri et al., 2013). Thus, it is reasonable to surmise that the topological arrangements after each cellular for cotranscription in multigene complexes, we division shuffle chromosomal proximities such that their three- devised a strategy using TALENs to cleave and dimensional (3D) arrangements are altered in one-dimensional disrupt gene loops in a well-characterized multigene (1D) space (Gibcus and Dekker, 2013). This may lead to every complex. Monitoring this disruption using RNA FISH cell in the population possessing unique spatial arrangements and immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that of its chromosomes (Orlova et al., 2012). perturbing the site of contact had a direct effect on Enhancer-promoter interactions utilize chromatin looping to transcription of other interacting genes. Unex- trigger dynamic changes in transcription initiation (Osborne pectedly, this effect on cotranscription was hierar- et al., 2004; Deng et al., 2012). An example of this is the well- chical, with dominant and subordinate members of established model between the locus control region (LCR) and b the multigene complex engaged in both intra- and the promoter of the -globin gene (Osborne et al., 2004). In a tis- interchromosomal contact. This observation reveals sue-specific manner, the LCR has been shown to physically con- tact the promoter of the b-globin gene and initiate transcription the profound influence of these chromosomal con- (Deng et al., 2012). These LCR-mediated chromosomal interac- tacts on the transcription of coregulated genes in a tions have been shown to result in variability in b-globin gene multigene complex. transcript levels or variegated gene expression across the pop- ulation (Noordermeer et al., 2011). In an otherwise identical pop- INTRODUCTION ulation of cells, presumably through chromosomal interactions, such ‘‘jackpot’’ cells display higher levels of b-globin transcrip- Transcription is replete with proximal and distal chromatin loop- tion (Noordermeer et al., 2011). Accordingly, the specific set of ing interactions whose formation represents the basic organizing chromosomal interactions (and consequent gene expression principle of nuclear architecture and gene activity (Miele and that may depend on LCR-mediated interactions) will vary Dekker, 2008; Palstra et al., 2008; Tan-Wong et al., 2012). between cells across the population (Strickfaden et al., 2010). Loop-mediated chromosomal contacts are usually identified This heterogeneity reveals the absolute requirement of single- on a genome-wide scale using population-based ‘‘chromosome cell analysis in global interactome and gene loop studies. conformation capture’’ (3C) technologies (Dekker et al., 2002; Looping also brings distal genes into close proximity, enabling Fullwood et al., 2009; Lieberman-Aiden et al., 2009; Li et al., chromosomal contact in ‘‘multigene complexes’’ at a single 2012). Analyses of 3C-based data reveal a large heterogeneity focus of multiple RNA polymerases (Schoenfelder et al., 2010; in global chromatin interactions (Fullwood et al., 2009; Noorder- Papantonis et al., 2012; Li et al., 2012). Numerous studies have meer et al., 2011; Li et al., 2012). Therefore, interacting DNA demonstrated that the formation of loop-mediated contact coin- elements identified by 3C-based technologies are verified at cides with alterations in gene expression (Spilianakis et al., 2005; the single-cell level using fluorescent in situ hybridization Apostolou and Thanos, 2008; Fullwood et al., 2009; Schoen- (FISH) assays (Schoenfelder et al., 2010; Papantonis et al., felder et al., 2010). Indeed, chromosomal contacts in multigene 606 Cell 155, 606–620, October 24, 2013 ª2013 Elsevier Inc. complexes appear to be the main modality of transcription in engaged in intrachromosomal contact at distances >48 Mbp, metazoan cells, as they are associated with >95% of transcrip- as well as interchromosomal interactions. Furthermore, restora- tional activity (Li et al., 2012; Sandhu et al., 2012). In a compara- tion of a disrupted gene loop re-established both chromosomal ble manner to enhancer-promoter interactions, specific chro- contacts and transcription of interacting genes in a sequence- matin interactions in multigene complexes are detected in a independent manner. The unexpected hierarchical organization subset of cells within the population (Schoenfelder et al., 2010; within the TNFa-induced multigene complex reveals the unprec- Papantonis et al., 2010). Genome-wide chromatin interaction edented level of influence of these chromosomal contacts on the analysis with paired end tags (ChIA-PET) uncovered a multigene transcription of coregulated genes in a multigene complex. complex, including the GREB1 locus and three other genes (Li et al., 2012). Of the four interacting genes, only GREB1 transcrip- RESULTS tion is activated by the estrogen receptor-a (ERa)(Li et al., 2012). Intriguingly, despite the fact that this multigene complex may not The Transcriptional Response of Coregulated Genes in a assemble in every cell in the population, siRNAs targeting ERa Multigene Complex Is Asymmetric disrupted all four interacting genes (Li et al., 2012). Therefore, TNFa has been shown to rapidly and synchronously shape the even though these chromosomal contacts may only occur in a transcriptional response in early passage human umbilical vein fraction of the population, they clearly play a significant role in endothelial cells (HUVECs) by systematically inducing the forma- gene regulation. Moreover, this data supports a model of syner- tion of a large variety of different multigene complexes (Papan- gistic transcription in which chromosomal contact influences the tonis et al., 2012). Interacting genes in TNFa-induced multigene transcription of the interacting genes. This would connote that complexes are activated by NF-kB(Papantonis et al., 2010). The the topological framework for transcriptional regulation is phys- SAMD4A, TNFAIP2, and SLC6A5 genes associate in a NF-kB- ical contact via chromosomal looping in multigene complexes. dependent multigene complex (Figure 1A), which has been Current siRNA and 3C-based experimental approaches extensively characterized by 3C, 4C (3C capture-on-chip), tiling cannot be applied to multigene complexes in which all interact- microarray, and FISH and thus is an ideal model to interrogate ing genes are activated by the same transcription factor. Tumor the role that chromosomal contacts play in cotranscription at a necrosis factor alpha (TNFa) has been shown to induce the for- single-cell level (Wada et al., 2009; Papantonis et al., 2010; mation of such multigene complexes in which all interacting Papantonis et al., 2012). HUVECs were arrested in the G0 phase genes are activated by NF-kB(Papantonis et al., 2012). Ten of the cell cycle by serum deprivation (Larkin et al., 2012). Impor- minutes after TNFa stimulation, the promoters of genes located tantly, the transcription of SAMD4A, TNFAIP2, and SLC6A5 is on the same chromosome (SAMD4A and TNFAIP2) and on a rapidly induced 10 min post-TNFa stimulation (Figure 1B; different chromosome (SLC6A5) associate to form part of a Papantonis et al., 2010). Concurrent to their expression at NF-kB-dependent multigene complex (Papantonis et al., 2010). 10 min, prior 3C data, including our own (data not shown; Papan- RNA FISH assays targeting the approximate sites of interaction tonis et al., 2010), indicate that chromosomal contacts between identified by 3C suggest an association between the formation these genes occur at sites 1.5 kbp downstream of the TSS (Fig- of this NF-kB-regulated multigene complex and the cotranscrip- ure 1B). To interrogate whether the formation of these contacts is tion of interacting genes (Papantonis et al., 2010). However, both associated with cotranscription, we designed RNA FISH probes 3C and FISH approaches fail to reveal the necessity of chromo- to target the