DOCSLIB.ORG

Table S1. Population Names and Geographic Origin of Y Chromosome Samples Used in This Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table S1. Population Names and Geographic Origin of Y Chromosome Samples Used in This Study Table S1. Population names and geographic origin of Y chromosome samples used in this study. Region/Population N Country Lat Long Source Africa (N=26) Baka-Pygmies 3 Cameroon 2.9 14.3 (Lachance et al. 2012) Bakola-Pygmies 1 Cameroon 2.9 14.3 (Lachance et al. 2012) Bedzan-Pygmies 1 Cameroon 2.9 14.3 (Lachance et al. 2012) Congo-Pygmies 3 Congo 0.9 15.9 This study Hadza 5 Tanzania -3.7 35.1 (Lachance et al. 2012) Luhya 3 Kenya 0.6 34.8 (Drmanac et al. 2010) Maasai 2 Kenya -1.3 35.3 (Drmanac et al. 2010) Sandawe 5 Tanzania -4.9 35.8 (Lachance et al. 2012) Yoruba 3 Nigeria 7.4 3.9 (Drmanac et al. 2010) Near East and the Caucasus (N=45) Abkhazians 2 Georgia 43.1 40.6 This study Arab-Christian 3 Israel 32.9 35.3 This study Arab-Muslim 2 Israel 32.8 35.2 This study Arabs 2 Saudi Arabia 33.8 35.6 This study Armenians 6 Armenia 40.2 44.5 This study Assyrians 3 Armenia 40.1 44 This study Avars 2 Russia 42.2 47 This study Azerbaijanis 2 Azerbaijan 40.1 47.5 This study Balkars 1 Russia 43.7 44.2 This study Circassians 2 Russia 44.7 40 This study Druze 2 Israel 32.8 35.2 This study Georgians 1 Georgia 43 41.4 This study Georgians-Imeretins 1 Georgia 41.8 44.7 This study Iranians 4 Iran 35.1 51.2 This study Jordanians 2 Jordan 31.9 35.9 This study Kabardins 2 Russia 43.5 43.6 This study Kumyks 1 Russia 43 47.5 This study Lebanese 1 Lebanon 33.8 35.6 This study Lezgins 2 Russia 41.6 48.3 This study North-Ossetians 2 Russia 43.2 43.9 This study Tabasarans 2 Russia 42 47.9 This study Europe (N=81) Albanians 3 Albania 41.3 19.8 This study Baptized-Tatars 1 Russia 55.9 51.2 This study Bashkirs 2 Russia 51.9 58.2 This study Belarusians 3 Belarus 52.2 24.4 This study Central-Russians 3 Russia 57.8 28.3 This study Chuvashes 1 Russia 53.7 54.7 This study Zaporizhsky Cossacks 2 Ukraine 47.8 35.2 This study Kuban Cossacks 2 Russia 45 38.7 This study Bosnia- Croats 3 43.3 17.8 This study Herzegovina Estonians 5 Estonia 59 22.8 This study Personal Genome Project French 1 France 48.9 2.4 (PGP) Germans 1 Germany 52.5 10.1 This study Hungarians 2 Ukraine 48 24.3 This study Italians 3 Italy 43.6 11 (Drmanac et al. 2010) Karelians 3 Russia 61.2 32.4 This study Komis 2 Russia 62.6 58 This study Latvians 2 Latvia 56.9 24.5 This study Lithuanians 1 Lithuania 55.3 24 This study Maris 3 Russia 55.4 56 This study Mishar-Tatars 1 Russia 54.8 51.4 This study Moldavians 1 Moldova 47.1 28.7 This study Mordvins 3 Russia 54.1 43.3 This study North-Russians 2 Russia 64.7 43.4 This study NW-Europeans 5 Europe 53.4 6.5 (Drmanac et al. 2010) Poles 1 Poland 52.2 21 PGP Portuguese 1 Portugal 38.7 -9 PGP Saami 3 Norway 69.9 25.2 This study Swedes 2 Sweden 59.4 18 This study Tatars 2 Russia 54.6 53.8 This study Udmurts 3 Russia 57.3 54.1 This study Ukrainians 7 Ukraine 51.5 31.4 This study Ukrainians 2 Ukraine 51.5 31.4 PGP British 2 United Kingdom 51.5 -0.1 PGP Vepsas 3 Russia 61.4 34.8 This study Central Asia (N=20) Ishkasim 2 Tajikistan 37 71.7 This study Rushan-Vanch 2 Tajikistan 38.5 71.7 This study Shugnan 1 Tajikistan 37.5 72.4 This study Tajiks 1 Tajikistan 38.4 68.9 This study Kazakhs 3 Kazakhstan 47.5 61.5 This study Kyrgyz 7 Kyrgyzstan 42.2 77 This study Turkmens 3 Uzbekistan 42.6 58.9 This study Uzbek 1 Uzbekistan 41 70.9 This study South Asia (N=25) Asur 1 India 23.7 85.3 This study Balija 1 India 14.7 77.6 This study Bengali 1 India 22.9 88.3 This study Brahmin 2 India 25.3 83.1 This study Bangladeshi 2 Bangladesh 23.7 90.4 This study Gond 1 India 22.2 79.9 This study Gujaratis 3 India 23.5 72.8 (Drmanac et al. 2010) Gupta 1 India 25.5 82.9 This study Ho 1 India 24.1 84.2 This study Kapu 1 India 17.7 83.2 This study Kol 1 India 24.5 83.2 This study Kshatriya 1 India 25.7 82.7 This study Kurmi 1 India 25.2 83 This study Madhya-Pradesh 1 India 23.3 77.1 This study Malayan 1 India 10.4 76.7 This study Orissa 1 India 20.5 85.9 This study Punjabi 1 India 17 75.9 This study Nepalese 2 Nepal 26.8 87.3 This study Santhal 1 India 22.8 85.7 This study Thakur 1 India 27 77.2 This study East and Southeast Asia (N=42) Aeta 3 Philippines 17.6 121 This study Agta 3 Philippines 17.8 121.2 This study Bajo 4 Indonesia -4 122.6 This study Batak 3 Philippines 10.5 119.5 This study Burmese 8 Myanmar 16.4 95.9 This study Chinese 2 China 32 120.3 PGP Dusun 3 Brunei 4.8 114.6 This study Han 1 China 39.9 116.4 (Drmanac et al. 2010) Igorot 1 Philippines 17.1 121 This study Japanese 1 Japan 35.7 139.7 (Drmanac et al. 2010) Lebbo 4 Indonesia 1.7 117.2 This study Murut 5 Brunei 4.5 114.7 This study Vietnamese 4 Vietnam 21 105.9 This study Oceania (N=6) Koinanbe 3 Papua New Guinea -5.5 144.6 This study Kosipe 3 Papua New Guinea -8.5 147.2 This study Siberian and Mongolia (N=62) Altai-Kizhi 3 Russia 51.3 85.4 This study Altai-Telengit 1 Russia 50.8 88.3 This study Buryats 12 Russia 53.8 102.8 This study Chukchis 2 Russia 64.7 177.5 (Clemente et al. 2014) Eskimo 2 Russia 64.5 -172.9 (Clemente et al. 2014) Evenks 3 Russia 58.9 128.7 This study Evens 8 Russia 65.3 130 This study Kets 2 Russia 62.5 86.3 This study Koryaks 12 Russia 59.1 159.9 (Clemente et al. 2014) Forest-Nenets 1 Russia 64.9 77.8 This study Tundra-Nenets 2 Russia 67 78.2 This study Selkups 1 Russia 65.7 87 This study Shor 1 Russia 52.8 87.9 This study Tuvinians 2 Russia 51.5 92.8 This study Yakuts 4 Russia 62.3 132 This study Mongol-Khalkh 1 Mongolia 45.7 106.3 This study Mongol-Khalkh 4 Mongolia 43.5 104.3 This study Mongol-Zakhchin 1 Mongolia 48 91.6 This study Andes (N=13) Calchaquíes 3 Argentina -25.1 -66.2 This study Colla 8 Argentina -24.2 -66.3 This study Wichí 2 Argentina -23.2 -64.1 This study Total 320 Samples not used in geographically explicit analyses (N=153) Jews (N=18) Ashkenazi-Jews 2 France NA NA This study Cochin-Jews 1 India NA NA This study Ethiopian-Jews 1 Ethiopia NA NA This study Georgian-Jews 1 Georgia NA NA This study Iranian-Jews 1 Iran NA NA This study Iraqi-Jews 3 Iraq NA NA This study Kurdistan-Jews 1 Iraq NA NA This study Moroccan-Jews 1 Morocco NA NA This study Mumbai-Jews 2 India NA NA This study Turkey-Jews 1 Turkey NA NA This study Uzbekistan-Jews 2 Uzbekistan NA NA This study Yemenite-Jews 2 Yemen NA NA This study Others (N=33) African-Americans 3 USA (Drmanac et al. 2010) Australian 2 Australia -17.1 132.5 This study CEPH-pedigree 7 Europe NA NA (Drmanac et al. 2010) Estonian-pedigree (6 excluded) 8 Estonia 59 22.8 This study Estonians 2 Estonia 59 22.8 PGP German duplicate sequence 1 Germany 52.5 10.1 This study Komi duplicate sequence 1 Russia 62.6 58 This study Latino/Hispanic 1 Colombia NA NA PGP Mbo 2 Cameroon 5.7 9.9 This Study Mexicans 2 USA NA NA (Drmanac et al. 2010) Murut duplicate sequence 1 Brunei 4.5 114.7 This study Puerto-Ricans 2 Puerto_Rico NA NA (Drmanac et al. 2010) Ukrainians duplicate sequence 1 Ukraine 51.5 31.4 PGP Geographic ancestry not known N.A. NA NA PGP (N=102) Total 473 (456 without 13 relatives and 4 duplicates) Note: The total number of newly reported sequences, excluding 6 relatives and 3 duplicates, is 299, including 16 released under accession number PRJEB7258 (Clemente et al. 2014). Table S2. The effect of different quality filters on the number of Y chromosome SNPs in 475 male samples. L - total length of chrY considered, including variable and non-variable positions; SNPs - total number of binary SNPs; Recurrent – number of SNPs that occur in at least three unique lineages; FS - average number of father – son differences in 24 Dutch father-son pairs, 6 Estonian father-son pairs and 1 brother-brother pair, including cases where father has an ancestral allele and the son or one of the brothers has a derived allele.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Song Traditions of the Volga-Ural Tatars in the 21St Century: Issues in the Transmission of Historic Singing Styles Nailya Almeeva
    Song Traditions of the Volga-Ural Tatars in the 21st Century: Issues in the Transmission of Historic Singing Styles Nailya Almeeva In the 20th century ethnic music attracted this has long been a phenomenon of revival great interest. With increasing ease of travel performance of folklore in live performance, not and communication, countries and continents by the bearers of folklore musical thinking and seemed to become closer, and access to original hearing but, loosely speaking, by those who folk material became ever easier. Ethnic music learned it. Understanding the value of the original could now be found not only in print but in live sound of ritual (time-bound) singing, one cannot performance, on television and on the internet. remain indiff erent to its revival, particularly once As a result, the whole spectrum of methods and one is aware of what can be lost during such types of intoning (a term introduced by Izaly revival. Zemtsovsky (1981: 87), which means types of voice Globalisation and the mass media have had a production) and sounding techniques of the oral particularly negative eff ect on ritual (time-bound) tradition could be experienced, even without genres and on the types of folklore dependent leaving home. Many of the methods bear the on a traditional way of life, on pre-industrial ways characteristics common for earlier, sometimes of production and on the natural environment. very ancient, historic epochs. In those places where these have ceased, ritual Traditional societies became urbanised, and folklore fades and eventually disappears. the all-permeating eff ects of the mass media The issues described above apply to the ritual overwhelmed the traditional ear.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Governance on Russia's Early-Modern Frontier
    ABSOLUTISM AND EMPIRE: GOVERNANCE ON RUSSIA’S EARLY-MODERN FRONTIER DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Matthew Paul Romaniello, B. A., M. A. The Ohio State University 2003 Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. Eve Levin, Advisor Dr. Geoffrey Parker Advisor Dr. David Hoffmann Department of History Dr. Nicholas Breyfogle ABSTRACT The conquest of the Khanate of Kazan’ was a pivotal event in the development of Muscovy. Moscow gained possession over a previously independent political entity with a multiethnic and multiconfessional populace. The Muscovite political system adapted to the unique circumstances of its expanding frontier and prepared for the continuing expansion to its east through Siberia and to the south down to the Caspian port city of Astrakhan. Muscovy’s government attempted to incorporate quickly its new land and peoples within the preexisting structures of the state. Though Muscovy had been multiethnic from its origins, the Middle Volga Region introduced a sizeable Muslim population for the first time, an event of great import following the Muslim conquest of Constantinople in the previous century. Kazan’s social composition paralleled Moscow’s; the city and its environs contained elites, peasants, and slaves. While the Muslim elite quickly converted to Russian Orthodoxy to preserve their social status, much of the local population did not, leaving Moscow’s frontier populated with animists and Muslims, who had stronger cultural connections to their nomadic neighbors than their Orthodox rulers. The state had two major goals for the Middle Volga Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts English
    International Symposium: Interaction of Turkic Languages and Cultures Abstracts Saule Tazhibayeva & Nevskaya Irina Turkish Diaspora of Kazakhstan: Language Peculiarities Kazakhstan is a multiethnic and multi-religious state, where live more than 126 representatives of different ethnic groups (Sulejmenova E., Shajmerdenova N., Akanova D. 2007). One-third of the population is Turkic ethnic groups speaking 25 Turkic languages and presenting a unique model of the Turkic world (www.stat.gov.kz, Nevsakya, Tazhibayeva, 2014). One of the most numerous groups are Turks deported from Georgia to Kazakhstan in 1944. The analysis of the language, culture and history of the modern Turkic peoples, including sub-ethnic groups of the Turkish diaspora up to the present time has been carried out inconsistently. Kazakh researchers studied history (Toqtabay, 2006), ethno-political processes (Galiyeva, 2010), ethnic and cultural development of Turkish diaspora in Kazakhstan (Ibrashaeva, 2010). Foreign researchers devoted their studies to ethnic peculiarities of Kazakhstan (see Bhavna Dave, 2007). Peculiar features of Akhiska Turks living in the US are presented in the article of Omer Avci (www.nova.edu./ssss/QR/QR17/avci/PDF). Features of the language and culture of the Turkish Diaspora in Kazakhstan were not subjected to special investigation. There have been no studies of the features of the Turkish language, with its sub- ethnic dialects, documentation of a corpus of endangered variants of Turkish language. The data of the pre-sociological surveys show that the Kazakh Turks self-identify themselves as Turks Akhiska, Turks Hemshilli, Turks Laz, Turks Terekeme. Unable to return to their home country to Georgia Akhiska, Hemshilli, Laz Turks, Terekeme were scattered in many countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Haplotype Frequencies at the DRD2 Locus in Populations of the East European Plain
    BMC Genetics BioMed Central Research article Open Access Haplotype frequencies at the DRD2 locus in populations of the East European Plain Olga V Flegontova*1, Andrey V Khrunin1, OlgaILylova1, Larisa A Tarskaia1, Victor A Spitsyn2, Alexey I Mikulich3 and Svetlana A Limborska1 Address: 1Department of Human Molecular Genetics, Institute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 2Medical and Genetics Scientific Centre, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia and 3Institute of Arts, Ethnography and Folklore, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus Email: Olga V Flegontova* - [email protected]; Andrey V Khrunin - [email protected]; Olga I Lylova - [email protected]; Larisa A Tarskaia - [email protected]; Victor A Spitsyn - [email protected]; Alexey I Mikulich - [email protected]; Svetlana A Limborska - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 30 September 2009 Received: 9 March 2009 Accepted: 30 September 2009 BMC Genetics 2009, 10:62 doi:10.1186/1471-2156-10-62 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/10/62 © 2009 Flegontova et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: It was demonstrated previously that the three-locus RFLP haplotype, TaqI B-TaqI D-TaqI A (B-D-A), at the DRD2 locus constitutes a powerful genetic marker and probably reflects the most ancient dispersal of anatomically modern humans. Results: We investigated TaqI B, BclI, MboI, TaqI D, and TaqI A RFLPs in 17 contemporary populations of the East European Plain and Siberia.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Fig. 4
    21 1 563 (45) R1a2b Kazakhs Kazakhs Kaz1 46 24 3 564 (146) R1a2b Iraqi-Jews Iraqi-Jews ISR40 148 22 2 569 (109) R1a2b Bengali West-Bengal Beng2 110 27 2 571 (107) R1a2b Gupta Uttar-Pradesh Gupta1 108 19 5 560 (116) R1a2b Middle-caste Orissa OrMc1 117 3 574 18 (141) R1a2b Kurmi Uttar-Pradesh Kurmi1 143 29 0 585 0 573 (82) R1a2b Ishkasim Tajiks Ishk1 83 39 (274) R1a2b Cossacks Cossacks Cosk2 284 27 0 586 (88) R1a2 Ishkasim Tajiks Ishk2 89 31 (47) R1a2 Rushan-Vanch Tajiks RVnch2 48 0 584 10 (222) R1a2c Altaians Altaians Altai5 230 24546 5 0 587 (84) R1a2c Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Kyrgz2 85 3 545 2 0 544 (22) R1a2c Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Kyrgz4 22 3 (89) R1a2c Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Kyrgz3 90 39 1 588 1 580 (15) R1a2 Assyrians Assyrians Assyr1 15 30 (93) R1a2 Ashkenazi-Jews Ashkenazi-Jews ISR10 94 115 (73) R1a2d Balkars Balkars Balkar2 74 35 1 589 (148) R1a2d Mumbai-Jews Mumbai Israel42 150 2 0 590 23 547 (23) R1a2d Shugnan Tajiks Shugn1 23 4 0 583 (245) R1a2d Circassians Circassians Cirkas3 253 0 592 24 (90) R1a2d Iraqi-Jews Iraqi-Jews ISR01 91 0 591 31 1 579 (81) R1a2d Rushan-Vanch Tajiks RVnch1 82 27 (272) R1a2d Azerbaijanis Azerbaijanis Azerb24 282 44 (120) R1a2 Iranians Iranians Iran3 121 2 0 582 23 542 (74) R1a2a Altaians Altaians Altai3 75 3 (142) R1a2a Altaians Altaians Altai4 144 5 570 3 (80) R1a2a Kyrgyz Tdj Kyrgyz KyrgzTJ2 81 18550 7 0 549 (86) R1a2a Kyrgyz Tdj Kyrgyz KyrgzTJ1 87 1 (87) R1a2a Kyrgyz Tdj Kyrgyz KyrgzTJ3 88 2 581 25 2 559 (242) R1a1c Hungarians Hungarians Hun 3 250 16 0 561 (268) R1a1c Cossacks Kuban Cossacks CoskK2 276 19 6 562 (20) R1a1c Ukrainians
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethno-Linguistic Situation in the Krasnoyarsk Territory at the Beginning of the Third Millennium
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Siberian Federal University Digital Repository Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 7 (2011 4) 919-929 ~ ~ ~ УДК 81-114.2 The Ethno-Linguistic Situation in the Krasnoyarsk Territory at the Beginning of the Third Millennium Olga V. Felde* Siberian Federal University 79 Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041 Russia 1 Received 4.07.2011, received in revised form 11.07.2011, accepted 18.07.2011 This article presents the up-to-date view of ethno-linguistic situation in polylanguage and polycultural the Krasnoyarsk Territory. The functional typology of languages of this Siberian region has been given; historical and proper linguistic causes of disequilibrum of linguistic situation have been developed; the objects for further study of this problem have been specified. Keywords: majority language, minority languages, native languages, languages of ethnic groups, diaspora languages, communicative power of the languages. Point Krasnoyarsk Territory which area (2339,7 thousand The study of ethno-linguistic situation in square kilometres) could cover the third part of different parts of the world, including Russian Australian continent. Sociolinguistic examination Federation holds a prominent place in the range of of the Krasnoyarsk Territory is important for the problems of present sociolinguistics. This field of solution of a number of the following theoretical scientific knowledge is represented by the works and practical objectives: for revelation of the of such famous scholars as V.M. Alpatov (1999), characteristics of communicative space of the A.A. Burikin (2004), T.G. Borgoyakova (2002), country and its separate regions, for monitoring V.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 25 (S) Jul. 2017 Vol
    Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 25 (S) Jul. 2017 Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities Contents Vectors and Narrative Discourses of Modern Society 1 Multicultural Persons in the Variative Discourse of Electronic Informative Society Identity Irina S. Karabulatova, Khanif S. Vildanov, Anastasiya A. Zinchenko, Elena N. Vasilishina and Anatoly P. Vassilenko Social and Economic Differentiation of the Issues Affecting the Health 17 of Modern Russians Vlada V. Sharipova, Chulpan F. Gabidullina, Svetlana V. Lobova, Natalya V. Shevchenko, Pavel A. Smelov and Galina M. Rossinskaya Features of Leadership Development of Kazakhstan Elementary 31 School Pupils Botagul A. Turgunbaeva, Gulmira R. Aspanova, Altynbek K. Moshkalov, Asan Abdrakhmanov, Gulnara K. Abdrahman and Alima T. Kenzhebayeva Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities The Direction of Transformation of Information and Communication 45 Technology (ICT) at the Present Stage of Development into an Electronic 2017 25 (S) Jul. Vol. and Information Society Faiz F. Khizbullin, Tatyana G. Sologub, Svetlana V. Bulganina, Tatiana E. Lebedeva, Vladimir S. Novikov and Victoria V. Prokhorova The Problem of Fixation of Siberian Endangered Languages in the 59 Multimedia Corpus: Evidence from the Siberian Tatars Tyumen Region Dialect Guzel Z. Fayzullina, Elena N. Ermakova, Alsina A. Fattakova and Habiba S. Shagbanova Problems of Inclusive Education of Disabled Children in the Context 73 of Integration into Modern Society Zinaida V. Polivara, Marziya P. Asylbekova, Olga N. Budeeva, Galina A. Zabirova, Leonid I. Kim and Maira S. Dzhilkishieva VOL. 25 (S) JUL. 2017 Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities The Modern Problems of Communication and Social Interaction of 89 A special issue devoted to Deviant Teenagers Using Social Networks Vectors & Narrative Discourses of Modern Society Irina V.
    [Show full text]
  • Folksongs of the Turkic World
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies, November 2016, Vol. 6, No. 11, 1343-1370 doi: 10.17265/2159-5836/2016.11.008 D DAVID PUBLISHING Folksongs of the Turkic World János Sipos Institute for Musicology of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary The long-term goal of my research has been to systematize and compare by musical criteria the folk songs of Turkic groups and ethnicities living around them. Here I rarely touch on instrumental folk music, the repertoire of professional or semi-professional performers, the most recent strata, seldom or just occasionally discuss art music and the cultural, social and anthropological implications of music are only sporadically considered, too. There are close connections between the languages of Turkic groups but their musical stocks are fundamentally different. Actually, that is not surprising, because these people are, at least in part, Turkified, and through their substrata (that is people absorbed by them) they are in genetic and cultural relations with several non-Turkic peoples. My research therefore has repercussions; apart from the Turkic-speaking peoples tied by culture, language and history, upon their neighbors and partly absorbed other peoples, creating the foundation for an even broader future comparative ethnomusicological research of Eurasian groups. This paper is aimed to provide a very short summary about the findings of my field researches into the folk music of different Turkic-speaking people between 1987 and 2015. I introduce the sources, the collecting work and the methods of processing and analyzing the songs. I also give an analytical introduction to the folksong of Anatolian Turks, Azeris, Turkmens, Uzbeks (and Tajiks), Karachay-Balkars, Kazakhs, Kyrgyzs, a Sufi Turkish community in Thrace and the area of the Volga-Kama-Belaya region.
    [Show full text]
  • Music of Central Asia and of the Volga-Ural Peoples. Teaching Aids for the Study of Inner Asia No
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 295 874 SO 019 077 AUTHOR Slobin, Mark TITLE Music of Central Asia and of the Volga-Ural Peoples. Teaching Aids for the Study of Inner Asia No. 5. INSTITUTION Indiana Univ., Bloomington. Asian Studies Research Inst. SPONS AGENCY Association for Asian Studies, .an Arbor, Mich. PUB DATE 77 NOTE 68p. AVAILABLE FROMAsian Studies Research Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 ($3.00). PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom Use - Guides (For Teachers) (052) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Area Studies; *Asian History; *Asian Studies; Cultural Education; Culture; Foreign Countries; Foreign Culture; Higher Education; Instructional Materials; *Music; Musical Instruments; Music Education; *Non Western Civilization; Resource Materials; Resource Units; Secondary Education; Social Studies IDENTIFIERS *Asia (Central).; *Asia (Volga Ural Region); Folk Music; USSR ABSTRACT The music of the peoples who inhabit either Central Asia or the Volga-Ural region of Asia is explored in this document, which provides information that can be incorporated into secondary or higher education courses. The Central Asian music cultures of the Kirghiz, Kazakhs, Turkmens, Karakalpaks, Uighurs, Tajiks, and Uzbeks are described and compared through examinations of: (1) physical environmental factors; (2) cultural patterns; (3) history; (4) music development; and (5) musical instruments. The music of the Volga-Ural peoples, who comprise the USSR nationalities of the Mari (Cheremis), Chuvash, Udmurts (Votyaks), Mordvins, Bashkirs, Tatars, and Kalmucks, is examined, with an emphasis on differences in musical instruments. A 13-item bibliography of Central Asian music and a 17-item Volga-Ural music bibliography are included. An appendix contains examples of musical scores from these regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Science Journal 2014;11(7S) Http
    Life Science Journal 2014;11(7s) http://www.lifesciencesite.com Some results of the research system-synchronous modern dialect of the Tatar language Ferits Yusupovich Yusupov and Irina Sovetovna Karabulatova Kazan Federal University, Tatarstan str, 2, Kazan, 420021, Russian Federation Abstract. This article analyzes the study of modern dialects of the Tatar language. The authors were carried out dialectological expeditions over the years of various regions of residing Tatars. The authors have drawn parallels with the different groups of Turkic languages. The specific layer is highlighted in the diasystem, which we nominally call as oguzizms. They belong to archaism category and have the anachronistic character. Their presence in all specific systems shows that these forms were frequently used, but later they were superseded by “rival” forms. It seems probable that these forms were derived from old-Kipchak language. Nowadays they are considered as the old-Turkic layer of origins. The authors provide new classification parameters to allocate Tatar dialects. [Yusupov F.Y., Karabulatova I.S. Some results of the research system-synchronous modern dialect of the Tatar language Life Sci J 2014;11(7s):246-] (ISSN:1097-8135). http://www.lifesciencesite.com. 50 Keywords: Turkology, Tatar language, modern dialect, Classificatory features of dialects, verb Introduction the formation of infinitive forms from archaic action Researchers are studying the Turkic nouns (as uku faydaly / reading is useful) and languages from different positions. However, the main participles. The formation of participles became line of research is based on the ethnography of complicated by means of additional morphological speaking and contrastive linguistics. The first is features as a result of grammatical designation of directed represented widely in the American studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Policy in the Russian Federation: Language Diversity and National Identity
    Language Policy in the Russian Federation: language diversity and national identity by Marc Leprêtre Abstract This paper gives an overview on the different language policies implemented in the Russian Federation, stressing the relevance of the historical background, the relations between language and nationalism, and language promotion as a tool for preventing inter-ethnic conflicts and for ensuring a peaceful and balanced linguistic diversity. The text is structured in four sections: historical overview (language policy and nation-building in the USSR); interethnic tensions in the Russian Federation in the post-Soviet context; the awakening of national groups in Russia; and strategies for a peaceful and balanced management of linguistic diversity in the Russian Federation and the Soviet successor states. 1 1. Historical overview: language policy and nation-building in the USSR The processes of language planning and language policy carried on since 1991 in the Russian Federation can't be explained without a short reference to the historical, political and social outcomes raised by the nationality and language policies implemented during decades in the former USSR. Nevertheless, insofar as the topic of this paper is what is going on nowadays regarding the management of language diversity, I will try to summarize this historical background2. The ideological bases of the Soviet nationality policies and the process of nationalization3 implemented in the republics had a rather paradoxical character as far as on the one hand the Soviet regime entitled the nationalities with a well-defined political and territorial status -even for those which had not yet reached a pre-capitalist level of development- which led to a process of nation-building where political and territorial units were created on the basis of nations that constituted themselves as historical cultural communities during the Tsarist period, contrary to what had been the usual pattern in Western Europe.
    [Show full text]