DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy Policies of Iea Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy Policies of Iea Countries ENERGY POLICIES OF IEA COUNTRIES Norway 2017 Review Secure Sustainable Together ENERGY POLICIES OF IEA COUNTRIES Norway 2017 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The International Energy Agency (IEA), an autonomous agency, was established in November 1974. Its primary mandate was – and is – two-fold: to promote energy security amongst its member countries through collective response to physical disruptions in oil supply, and provide authoritative research and analysis on ways to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy for its 29 member countries and beyond. The IEA carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co-operation among its member countries, each of which is obliged to hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days of its net imports. The Agency’s aims include the following objectives: n Secure member countries’ access to reliable and ample supplies of all forms of energy; in particular, through maintaining effective emergency response capabilities in case of oil supply disruptions. n Promote sustainable energy policies that spur economic growth and environmental protection in a global context – particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions that contribute to climate change. n Improve transparency of international markets through collection and analysis of energy data. n Support global collaboration on energy technology to secure future energy supplies and mitigate their environmental impact, including through improved energy efficiency and development and deployment of low-carbon technologies. n Find solutions to global energy challenges through engagement and dialogue with non-member countries, industry, international organisations and other stakeholders. IEA member countries: Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Secure Greece Sustainable Hungary Together Ireland Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic © OECD/IEA, 2017 Spain International Energy Agency Sweden Website: www.iea.org Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom Please note that this publication United States is subject to specific restrictions that limit its use and distribution. The European Commission The terms and conditions are also participates in available online at www.iea.org/t&c/ the work of the IEA. Executive summary ...........................................................................................................9 Oil and gas ...........................................................................................................................9 Electricity system ...............................................................................................................10 Limiting carbon dioxide emissions.....................................................................................10 ONTENTS ONTENTS Key recommendations ....................................................................................................12 PART I. POLICY ANALYSIS 1. General energy policy .................................................................................................15 Country overview ...............................................................................................................15 TABLEOF C Supply and demand ...........................................................................................................16 Institutions ..........................................................................................................................20 Key policies ........................................................................................................................22 Assessment .......................................................................................................................24 Recommendations .............................................................................................................27 References ........................................................................................................................27 2. Climate change ............................................................................................................29 Greenhouse gas emissions ...............................................................................................29 Energy-related CO2 emissions ..........................................................................................30 Local air quality ..................................................................................................................33 Institutions ..........................................................................................................................33 Policies and measures ......................................................................................................34 Climate change vulnerability and adaptation ....................................................................37 Assessment .......................................................................................................................37 Recommendations .............................................................................................................39 References ........................................................................................................................39 3. Energy efficiency .........................................................................................................41 2017 Overview ............................................................................................................................41 Energy consumption by sector ..........................................................................................43 OECD/IEA, Institutions ..........................................................................................................................47 © TABLE OF CONTENTS Policies and measures ......................................................................................................47 Case study: E-mobility .......................................................................................................52 Assessment .......................................................................................................................55 Recommendations .............................................................................................................57 References ........................................................................................................................58 Further reading ..................................................................................................................59 PART II. SECTOR ANALYSIS 4. Fossil fuels ...................................................................................................................61 Upstream oil and gas sector ..............................................................................................61 Oil .......................................................................................................................................69 Natural gas ........................................................................................................................77 Coal....................................................................................................................................82 Assessment .......................................................................................................................82 Recommendations .............................................................................................................85 References ........................................................................................................................86 Further reading ..................................................................................................................86 5. Carbon capture and storage ......................................................................................87 Overview ............................................................................................................................87 Policy framework ...............................................................................................................88 International collaboration .................................................................................................89 Ongoing projects ...............................................................................................................91 CCS strategy and planned projects ..................................................................................92 Assessment .......................................................................................................................96 Recommendations .............................................................................................................97 References ........................................................................................................................97 2017 Further reading ..................................................................................................................98 6. Electricity......................................................................................................................99 OECD/IEA, © Overview ............................................................................................................................99 Supply and demand .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Short Term Precipitation in Norway 1967-2010
    no. 15/2011 Climate ANALYSIS OF SHORT TERM PRECIPITATION IN NORWAY 1967-2010 Jostein Mamen, Rasmus Benestad and Jan Erik Haugen Photo: Einar Egeland . Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Observation of short term precipitation in Norway . 4 1.2 Types of stations . 4 1.2.1 Tipping bucket rain gauge stations . 4 1.2.2 Weight pluviometer stations . 4 2 Rainfall rate statistics from tipping bucket rain gauge data 5 2.1 Maximum recorded 1 minute values . 5 2.2 Seasonal variations . 8 3 Rainfall rate statistics from weight pluviometer data 10 3.1 Maximum recorded 1 hour values . 10 3.2 Seasonal variations . 12 3.3 Conversion method from 1 hour to 1 minute precipitation . 12 4 Rainfall rate maps 13 4.1 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.001 % of the time . 13 4.2 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.01 % of the time . 16 4.2.1 Monthly values . 19 4.3 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.1 % of the time . 19 4.4 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.5 % of the time . 22 5 Rainfall rate trends from tipping bucket data and return periods 24 5.1 Rainfall rate trends . 24 5.1.1 Trends of maximum annual 1-minute intensity . 24 5.1.2 Trends of intensity exceeded 0.01 % of the time . 24 5.2 Return periods . 24 6 Methods used to derive rainfall intensity data from long term historical data set 26 7 Appendix - list of stations 33 3 1 Introduction In telecommunication heavy precipitation can lead to outage. [1], [4]. Met.no is therefore asked to analyze short term precipitation in Norway, down to one minute's time resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Nordic Energy Technologies
    Nordic Energy Technologies nBge A lIn A sustAInABle noRdIC eneRgy futuRe Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 energy Research and Innovation systems in The nordic Region 4 2.1 Describing Nordic Energy Innovation Systems 4 2.1.1 The Nordic Energy Mix 4 2.1.2 Energy Research and Innovation Systems in The Nordic Region 6 2.2 Assessing Nordic Energy Research and Innovation Systems 13 2.2.1 Framework Conditions 13 2.2.2 Energy Research and Innovation Performance 16 Publications, citations and patents 17 Technology deployment and diffusion 19 3 transnational Cooperation 23 3.1 Nordic Cooperation 23 3.2 Cooperation with Adjacent Areas 24 3.2.1 Cooperation with the Baltic Countries 24 3.2.2 European Research Area (ERA) 24 3.3 Emerging Economies 26 3.3.1 Russia 26 3.3.2 China 28 4 Concluding Remarks 30 5 Bibliography 32 Appendix 1: The noria-energy Project Portfolio 34 2 Nordic Energy Technologies ENABLING A SUSTAINABLE NORDIC ENERGY FUTURE Amund Vik and Benjamin Donald Smith, Nordic Energy Research LISTf o abbreViations CCS Carbon Capture and Storage CHP Combined Heat and Power COP15 UN Climate Summit in Copenhagen 2009 DTU Technical University of Denmark EPO European Patent Office ERA European Research Area ERA-NET European Research Area Network EU European Union EUDP Danish Energy Development and Demonstration Programme GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Green House Gasses IEA International Energy Agency IPCC UN International Panel on Climate Change IPR Intellectual Property Rights KTH Royal Institute of Technology NCM Nordic Council of Ministers NER Nordic
    [Show full text]
  • Current Experience with Renewable Support
    CURRENT EXPERIENCE WITH RENEWABLE SUPPORT SCHEMES IN EUROPE Prepared by the Council of European Energy Regulators (CEER) Page 1 of 127 Content 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................8 1.1 Framework....................................................................................................................8 1.2 Conclusion..................................................................................................................17 2 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................18 2.1 Objective.....................................................................................................................18 2.2 Methodology ...............................................................................................................18 2.3 Structure .....................................................................................................................19 3 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK.......................................................................................20 3.1 The EU Directives.......................................................................................................20 3.2 The environmental versus the regulatory focus..........................................................21 4 CURRENT SUPPLY AND DEMAND.............................................................................23 4.1 Country Specific Targets ............................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Document
    OKEA ASA 19.06.2020 Registration Document Registration Document OKEA ASA 19.06.2020 OKEA ASA 19.06.2020 Registration Document Important notice This Registration Document prepared according to Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, is valid for a period of up to 12 months following its approval by Norwegian FSA. This Registration Document was ap- proved by the Norwegian FSA on 19.06.2020. The prospectus for issuance of new bonds or other securities may for a period of up to 12 months from the date of the approval consist of this Regis- tration Document, a securities note and a summary if applicable to each issue and subject to a separate approval. This Registration Document is based on sources such as annual reports and publicly available infor- mation and forward looking information based on current expectations, estimates and projections about global economic conditions, the economic conditions of the regions and industries that are major markets for the Company line of business. A prospective investor should consider carefully the factors set forth in chapter 1 - Risk factors -, and elsewhere in the Prospectus, and should consult his or her own expert advisers as to the suita- bility of an investment in bonds, including any legal requirements, exchange control regulations and tax consequences within the country of residence and domicile for the acquisition, holding and dis- posal of bonds relevant to such prospective investor. The manager and/or affiliated companies and/or officers, directors and employees may be a market maker or hold a position in any instrument or related instrument discussed in this Registration Doc- ument and may perform or seek to perform financial advisory or banking services related to such instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 DIRECTORS’ CORPORATE FINANCIAL 2 YEAR 2019 REPORT GOVERNANCE STATEMENTS HOME
    DIRECTORS’ CORPORATE FINANCIAL YEAR 2019 REPORT GOVERNANCE STATEMENTS HOME Annual report 2019 DIRECTORS’ CORPORATE FINANCIAL 2 YEAR 2019 REPORT GOVERNANCE STATEMENTS HOME Gassco secures energy supplies GASSCO ANNUAL REPORT 2019 DIRECTORS’ CORPORATE FINANCIAL 3 YEAR 2019 REPORT GOVERNANCE STATEMENTS HOME FRODE LEVERSUND President and CEO Norwegian gas in a time of change Gassco secures energy supplies for Europe. We do this together with and on behalf of many important players on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS). Safe, reliable and efficient operation is always our priority, and safety always comes first. It is gratifying to note that virtually all HSE indicators moved in the right direction during 2019. An absence of gas leaks provides an important example of this. We also again achieved good gas deliveries from the NCS, providing some 107 billion standard cubic metres (scm) of natural gas to the UK and continental Europe. That nevertheless represented some reduction from 2018. One reason for this decline is that we implemented an extensive maintenance programme on the transport network during the year. That work safeguards the integrity and safety of our gas deliveries for the future. GASSCO ANNUAL REPORT 2019 DIRECTORS’ CORPORATE FINANCIAL 4 YEAR 2019 REPORT GOVERNANCE STATEMENTS HOME Engagement with the climate expanded The first gas infrastructure on the throughout Europe in 2019 and set the NCS was constructed 43 years ago. A agenda. The world population is growing well-functioning and ever more extensive and ever more energy is needed. At the transport system has grown up. This has same time, greenhouse gas (GHG) been crucial for Norway’s position as one emissions must be reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Sak 1: Mål Og Indikatorer for Måloppnåelse Og Effektiv Drift I
    Sak 1: Mål og indikatorer for måloppnåelse og effektiv drift i heleide selskaper der staten har en samfunnsmessig begrunnelse eller et sektorpolitisk mål med eierskapet Målet med undersøkelsen har vært å vurdere om heleide selskaper der staten har en samfunnsmessig begrunnelse for eller et sektorpolitisk mål med eierskapet, benytter mål og indikatorer for måloppnåelse og effektiv drift og rapporterer med bakgrunn i disse. Videre er det vurdert i hvilken grad departementene følger opp og vurderer samfunnsmessige effekter eller sektorpolitisk måloppnåelse og effektiv drift i selskapene. Som eier skal staten utarbeide et tydelig mål for eierskapet, fastsette vedtekter og velge styre, samt følge opp statens forventninger. Staten kan også benytte virkemidler som sektorspesifikk lovgivning, konsesjoner, statlige tilsyn og finansielle virkemidler som tilskudd, kjøp av tjenester og brukerfinansiering. Valg av styringsvirkemidler og selskapsform setter rammer for selskapets virksomhet og for statens eieroppfølging. Selskapets styre skal utarbeide klare mål og strategier innenfor rammene av selskapets vedtekter og rapportere om oppnåelse av disse til eier. Flere av Riksrevisjonens tidligere undersøkelser har vist at staten i liten grad benytter eierdialogen til å følge opp de samfunnsmessige effektene eller den sektorpolitiske måloppnåelsen som ligger til grunn for eierskapet. Undersøkelsene har også vist at det er behov for å styrke selskapenes arbeid med å fastsette mål og indikatorer som gjør det mulig å vurdere måloppnåelse og effektiv drift. Studier foretatt av blant annet Sørensen og Rattsø og Direktoratet for forvaltning og IKT har pekt på lignende utfordringer. For å tydeliggjøre statens mål med eierskapet i det enkelte selskap har den statlige selskapsporteføljen siden 2006 vært inndelt i fire kategorier.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Perspectives on Norway's Energy Future
    Research Paper Antony Froggatt, Paul Stevens and Siân Bradley Edited by Germana Canzi and Amanda Burton Energy, Environment and Resources Programme | June 2020 Expert Perspectives on Norway’s Energy Future Future on Norway’s Energy Expert Perspectives Expert Perspectives on Norway’s Energy Future Froggatt, Stevens and Bradley Stevens Froggatt, Chatham House Contents Abbreviations 2 Summary 3 1 Preamble: Energy Transition in a Post-COVID-19 World 5 2 Challenges and Opportunities for Norway 8 3 Norway’s Energy Future 13 4 Conclusions and Recommendations 38 Annex: Expert Perspectives 40 About the Editors 90 About the Interviewees 91 About the Authors 95 Acknowledgments 96 1 | Chatham House Expert Perspectives on Norway’s Energy Future Abbreviations CCS carbon capture and storage CCU carbon capture and use CCUS carbon capture, use and storage COP Conference of the Parties EIA Energy Information Administration EV electric vehicle GHG greenhouse gas GtCO2e gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent IEA International Energy Agency IPCC International Panel on Climate Change LUC land-use change mtoe million tonnes of oil equivalent NETs negative emissions technologies SAF sustainable aviation fuels SMR steam methane reformer SWF sovereign wealth fund UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2 | Chatham House Expert Perspectives on Norway’s Energy Future Summary • The world is undergoing a transition away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy. However, the speed and depth of this transition is uncertain and controversial. This will have significant implications for Norway, one of the world’s largest exporters of both energy and capital. • With international efforts to limit increases in global temperature to 2°C, and as close as possible to 1.5°C, appearing increasingly off-track, there is an urgent need for a rapid move away from the unabated use of fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Birds of Prey and Owls in Norway
    Conservation status of birds of prey and owls in Norway Oddvar Heggøy & Ingar Jostein Øien Norsk Ornitologisk Forening 2014 NOF-BirdLife Norway – Report 1-2014 © NOF-BirdLife Norway E-mail: [email protected] Publication type: Digital document (pdf)/75 printed copies January 2014 Front cover: Boreal owl at breeding site in Nord-Trøndelag. © Ingar Jostein Øien Editor: Ingar Jostein Øien Recommended citation: Heggøy, O. & Øien, I. J. (2014) Conservation status of birds of prey and owls in Norway. NOF/BirdLife Norway - Report 1-2014. 129 pp. ISSN: 0805-4932 ISBN: 978-82-78-52092-5 Some amendments and addenda have been made to this PDF document compared to the 75 printed copies: Page 25: Picture of snowy owl and photo caption added Page 27: Picture of white-tailed eagle and photo caption added Page 36: Picture of eagle owl and photo caption added Page 58: Table 4 - hen harrier - “Total population” corrected from 26-147 pairs to 26-137 pairs Page 60: Table 5 - northern goshawk –“Total population” corrected from 1434 – 2036 pairs to 1405 – 2036 pairs Page 80: Table 8 - Eurasian hobby - “Total population” corrected from 119-190 pairs to 142-190 pairs Page 85: Table 10 - peregrine falcon – Population estimate for Hedmark corrected from 6-7 pairs to 12-13 pairs and “Total population” corrected from 700-1017 pairs to 707-1023 pairs Page 78: Photo caption changed Page 87: Last paragraph under “Relevant studies” added. Table text increased NOF-BirdLife Norway – Report 1-2014 NOF-BirdLife Norway – Report 1-2014 SUMMARY Many of the migratory birds of prey species in the African-Eurasian region have undergone rapid long-term declines in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013
    Annual report 2013 1 RESULTS AND ACTIVITIES 2013 Content Key figures 2013 3 Part 5 | Reporting – the Energy Fund 35 The CEO speaks 4 2012 and 2013 Enova’s main objective 36 Part 1 | Enova’s outlook 5 Objectives and results of the Energy Fund 38 Green competitiveness 6 Management of the Energy Fund’s resources 40 New energy and climate technology 41 Part 2 | Enova’s activities 9 Climate reporting 52 Social responsibility 10 In-depth reporting 54 Organization 10 Energy results 54 Management 12 Funding level 55 Energy results by project category 56 Portfolio composition 58 Part 3 | Market descriptions 13 Activities 62 Enova – market team player 14 International 65 Indicators 14 Geographical distribution and the largest Renewable heating: 67 16 projects From new establishment to growth Tasks outside the Energy Fund 70 Industry and non-industrial plants and facilities: 18 More companies are cooperating with Enova Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) 70 Non-residential buildings: Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE) 70 20 Energy smart buildings for the future Natural gas 70 Residential buildings: 22 From advice to action Part 6 | Reporting – the Energy Fund New energy and climate technology: 71 24 An innovation perspective 2001-2011 Bioenergy: Energy results and allocations 2001-2011 72 26 Small steps towards a stronger market Climate reporting 78 Part 4 | New energy and climate Appendices 80 27 technology Consultation submissions 81 New technology for the future’s non-residential 28 Publications 81 buildings Definitions and explanation of terminology 82 Symbol key Investigated Renewable Industry Interaction Advicing New energy and Financing Non-residential climate technology buildings Graphs/tables Renewable heating Projects Resedential buildings 2 Key figures 2013 30% RENEWABLE HEATING 5% 1% RESIDENTIAL RENEWABLE BUILDINGS P O W E R PRODUCTION 1,4 TWh In 2013, Enova supported projects with a total energy result of 1.4 TWh through the Energy Fund, distributed over energy efficiency measures, conversion and increased utilization of renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Risks and Barriers for Norwegian Companies on the Russian Oil-And-Gas Market
    Bodø Graduate School of Business Master of Science in Energy Management EN 310 E Risks and Barriers for Norwegian Companies on the Russian Oil-and-Gas Market by MARINA GRINBLAT and IRINA VOLKOVA SPRING 2007 Risks and Barriers for Norwegian Companies on the Russian Oil-and-Gas market Abstract Abstract During the last years Russia has changed its status from the dependent and conformable oil- and-gas supplier towards the major world energy player. This has happened due to its impressive reserve base, exploration potential and its preferable geographic position. Because of the positive trends in Russian economy Norwegian businessmen seem to be changing their attitude toward Russia. The intensity of cooperation in the energy sphere between these countries has increased recently. The purpose of the present research is to describe and analyze the risks and barriers that Norwegian companies face on the Russian oil-and-gas market. In so doing, it tends to contribute to a better and deeper understanding of the current Russian - Norwegian relations in oil-and-gas sector. This research is based on six in-depth interviews with Russian and Norwegian experts who represent different types of energy related businesses: consulting firms, newspaper, engineering firms and educational institutions. A combination of these perspectives provides a better understanding of the research problem and a deeper insight into possibilities of Russian-Norwegian cooperation. The background information on both Russia and Norway is important to establish the context and the culture of two countries, and Hofstede`s framework is expected to help us to get a clearer picture. Further on, this research aims to determine and describe in detail six main groups of risks and barriers (socio - cultural, political, legislative, technical, economic and environmental) for Norwegian companies and organizations based on the primary and secondary data.
    [Show full text]
  • Elgbeitetaksering I Telemark Og Vestfold 2019
    Elgbeitetaksering i Telemark og Vestfold 2019 FAUN RAPPORT R20 | 2019 | Viltforvaltning| Morten Meland, Sigbjørn Rolandsen, Finn Olav Myhren, Anne Engh, Birgith R. Lunden, Stein Gunnar Clemensen, Ole Morten Ertzeid Opsahl, Espen Åsan & Ole Roer Oppdragsgiver: Telemark og Vestfold fylkeskommune Foto: Espen Åsan, Faun Naturforvaltning AS Faun Naturforvaltning Åsan, Foto: Espen Elgbeitetaksering i Telemark og Vestfold 2019| Faun | R20-2019 Tittel Sammendrag Elgbeitetaksering i Telemark og Vestfold 2019 Beitetakseringen ble gjennomført som overvåkingstakst etter «Solbraametoden Rapportnummer 2008» der siste års beiting på de utvalgte R20-2019 indikatorartene (furu, bjørk, ROS, gran og eik) ble vurdert. Forfattere Morten Meland, Ole Roer, Sigbjørn Det ble taksert 481 bestand totalt, tilsvarende Rolandsen, Finn Olav Myhren ca. 23 700 daa tellende elgareal og 13 200 daa produktivt skogareal bak hvert takserte Årstall bestand. 2019 I sum anses beitetrykket i Telemark og ISBN Vestfold som hhv. middels og nær 978-82-8389-058-7 bærekraftig. De kvalitativt viktigste beiteplantene, ROS-artene er overbeita i de Tilgjengelighet fleste av kommunene. Beitetrykket på furu og Fritt bjørk anses som bærekraftig i nær alle kommuner. Beiteskader på furu eller gran Oppdragsgiver forekommer sporadisk, men i ubetydelig grad. Telemark og Vestfold fylkeskommune For å oppnå et mer bærekraftig beitetrykk for Prosjektansvarlig oppdragsgiver de viktigste beiteplantene, ROS-artene, Ole Bjørn Bårnes (Telemark) anbefales en svak reduksjon i tettheten av elg Kristian Ingdal (Vestfold) i de fleste kommunene, med noen få unntak. Prosjektleder i Faun Meland, M., Rolandsen, S., Myhren, F.O., Engh, Morten Meland A., Lunden, B.R., Clemensen, S.G., Opsahl, O.M.E., Åsan, E. og Roer, O. 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Lasting Legacies
    Tre Lag Stevne Clarion Hotel South Saint Paul, MN August 3-6, 2016 .#56+0).')#%+'5 6*'(7674'1(1742#56 Spotlights on Norwegian-Americans who have contributed to architecture, engineering, institutions, art, science or education in the Americas A gathering of descendants and friends of the Trøndelag, Gudbrandsdal and northern Hedmark regions of Norway Program Schedule Velkommen til Stevne 2016! Welcome to the Tre Lag Stevne in South Saint Paul, Minnesota. We were last in the Twin Cities area in 2009 in this same location. In a metropolitan area of this size it is not as easy to see the results of the Norwegian immigration as in smaller towns and rural communities. But the evidence is there if you look for it. This year’s speakers will tell the story of the Norwegians who contributed to the richness of American culture through literature, art, architecture, politics, medicine and science. You may recognize a few of their names, but many are unsung heroes who quietly added strands to the fabric of America and the world. We hope to astonish you with the diversity of their talents. Our tour will take us to the first Norwegian church in America, which was moved from Muskego, Wisconsin to the grounds of Luther Seminary,. We’ll stop at Mindekirken, established in 1922 with the mission of retaining Norwegian heritage. It continues that mission today. We will also visit Norway House, the newest organization to promote Norwegian connectedness. Enjoy the program, make new friends, reconnect with old friends, and continue to learn about our shared heritage.
    [Show full text]