DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Annual report 2013 1 RESULTS AND ACTIVITIES 2013 Content Key figures 2013 3 Part 5 | Reporting – the Energy Fund 35 The CEO speaks 4 2012 and 2013 Enova’s main objective 36 Part 1 | Enova’s outlook 5 Objectives and results of the Energy Fund 38 Green competitiveness 6 Management of the Energy Fund’s resources 40 New energy and climate technology 41 Part 2 | Enova’s activities 9 Climate reporting 52 Social responsibility 10 In-depth reporting 54 Organization 10 Energy results 54 Management 12 Funding level 55 Energy results by project category 56 Portfolio composition 58 Part 3 | Market descriptions 13 Activities 62 Enova – market team player 14 International 65 Indicators 14 Geographical distribution and the largest Renewable heating: 67 16 projects From new establishment to growth Tasks outside the Energy Fund 70 Industry and non-industrial plants and facilities: 18 More companies are cooperating with Enova Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) 70 Non-residential buildings: Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE) 70 20 Energy smart buildings for the future Natural gas 70 Residential buildings: 22 From advice to action Part 6 | Reporting – the Energy Fund New energy and climate technology: 71 24 An innovation perspective 2001-2011 Bioenergy: Energy results and allocations 2001-2011 72 26 Small steps towards a stronger market Climate reporting 78 Part 4 | New energy and climate Appendices 80 27 technology Consultation submissions 81 New technology for the future’s non-residential 28 Publications 81 buildings Definitions and explanation of terminology 82 Symbol key Investigated Renewable Industry Interaction Advicing New energy and Financing Non-residential climate technology buildings Graphs/tables Renewable heating Projects Resedential buildings 2 Key figures 2013 30% RENEWABLE HEATING 5% 1% RESIDENTIAL RENEWABLE BUILDINGS P O W E R PRODUCTION 1,4 TWh In 2013, Enova supported projects with a total energy result of 1.4 TWh through the Energy Fund, distributed over energy efficiency measures, conversion and increased utilization of renewable energy. Did you know that… 34% 1.4 TWh corresponds to the energy 30% consumption of every household in NON-RESIDENTIAL Troms County, Norway. INDUSTRY AND BUILDINGS NON-INDUSTRIAL PLANTS AND FACILITIES RENEWABLE INDUSTRY NON- RESIDENTIAL NEW HEATING Enova will RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TECHNOLOGY Enova will ensure contribute to BUILDINGS Enova New technology renewable heating a more climate-friendly Enova works to realize provides advice and will solve the future’s becomes the preferred and energy-efficient maximum energy support for energy energy challenges. heating method in industry supplied with efficiency potential improvements in Enova supports Norway. Restructuring renewable energy. in buildings. Enova residential buildings. market introduction of to renewable heating is Enova works continu- supports market Support is provided new technology and an important measure ously to increase the players that want to both for constructing contributes investment for more climate- pace of restructuring construct, renovate or new buildings, as support for market friendly use of energy of energy end-use and operate the energy- well as for upgrading innovators. in our country. energy production in efficient buildings of existing residences. the industry. tomorrow. In 2013, 19 projects In 2013, 60 projects In 2013, 484 projects received funding were supported by In 2013, 174 projects In 2013, 583 projects and more than 6800 commitments from Enova. were supported by were supported by energy initiatives Enova. Enova. Enova received funding commitments from Enova. 3 THE CEO SPEAKS Enova invests in energy and climate solutions NILS KRISTIAN NAKSTAD Chief Executive Officer Never before has interest in implementing projects in collaboration with Enova been greater. For many, innovation and use of new energy and climate technology is the only natural choice. It is also the necessary choice to face the challenges posed by greenhouse gas emissions. In development billion in 2013. The new allocations in the Primary Capital Fund In 2013, Enova launched new programmes and strengthened its (Climate Technology Fund) will not yield income to the Energy own organization. We provide investment support through more Fund until 2014. We advanced the new efforts by investing NOK than 20 programmes, about half of which are new or were rene- 93 million in seven energy and climate technology projects in the wed in 2013. The organization has been reinforced through stron- industry. ger market orientation and specialization. Innovation and new technology Results in 2013 A red thread in Enova’s development in 2013 is increased We invested in 1350 new projects in 2013, with an overall energy investments in introduction of new technology and innovation. result of 1.4 TWh. We are eager to see a higher energy result, but Innovation in the markets consists of new technology, changed are very satisfied with the general activity level and the beginning behaviour, new knowledge and new business models. of the new energy and climate technology focus. Enova stimulates such innovation, for example through efforts in The markets for Norwegian industries have been somewhat chal- energy management, energy advising and pre-project support. In lenging and turbulent. Investments in mainland industries are technology projects we require the customer to have a business relatively low, which is reflected in our results. One positive feature model for the new solutions before we become involved. is a record number of projects from small industrial companies. We strengthened our efforts vis-à-vis the oil and gas industry in The results within renewable heating in 2013 were better than 2013. We believe technology and knowledge from oil and gas can anticipated. Investments are particularly high within increasing be transferred to projects in land-based industries and other areas expansion of existing district heating plants. in society. Enova has experience from such projects and believes this can be applied on a greater scope. The largest result contribution came from non-residential buildings. Rehabilitation of existing buildings yielded the greatest We strengthened follow-up and reporting in the technology pro- energy results, while new building efforts have lower results and jects. We believe there could be many valuable lessons to learn are more expensive. here on technology development and innovation processes, and believe it will provide us with ideas for further development. We are very happy with the development in our programmes for passive houses and low energy buildings; from very few new pas- Restructuring of energy end-use and energy production, scarcity sive houses being constructed in 2009 to 10 per cent of all non- of resources and greenhouse gas emissions residential buildings in 2013. The development was so robust that Our energy system is changing. New production is coming, new we discontinued support for new passive houses near the end of distribution is being developed and consumption is changing. 2013. We believe the market will continue this development wit- A robust supply and efficient energy use are important for hout our support. continued development of industry and value creation, and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Enova has expanded its programmes for households with support for energy advising and phasing out oil boilers, and launched a The global challenges associated with scarcity of resources and new subsidy programme for those utilizing the best solutions in increasing greenhouse gas emissions are inching steadily closer. the household market as well. Increased renewable energy production and more efficient ener- gy use are an important part of the solution. More projects were cancelled in 2013 than in previous years. The most affected markets were renewable heating and industry. A In a Norwegian context, we cannot allow a good power balance and drop in power prices and turbulent industrial markets may have an expansive, oil-driven economy to keep us from action. The inter- contributed to this. The largest cancelled project in 2013 came national markets want more renewable power and products that after Sødra Cell Tofte AS’ plant on Tofte was wound up. utilize resources efficiently, and leave a small climate footprint. The Energy Fund received NOK 1.7 billion and pledged NOK 2.0 Enova contributes to green competitiveness. 4 Part 1 Enova’s outlook FINANCING Green competitiveness 6 Enova’s most important tool is the financing we provide to projects, whether they are major industrial projects, or smaller household measures. ADVISING Enova’s second most important tool is the advice we provide to projects. It is given in a structured manner through our targeted programmes. INTERACTION Enova is a market team player. We contribute knowledge and capital for projects and enable more market players to realize their projects. 5 PART 1 ENOVA’S OUTLOOK Green competitiveness The message from the UN Climate Panel (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC) and the International Energy Agency is crystal clear. If the world does not take action quickly, climate change will be dramatic, with a global temperature increase of six degrees Celsius – which we definitely want to avoid. And we can, but it’s urgent. Without new initiatives, in 20 – 25 years, the world will no longer responsibility by the Norwegian Parliamentfor helping develop be able to limit global warming to two degrees. Luckily, there are the future’s energy and
Recommended publications
  • Nordic Energy Technologies

    Nordic Energy Technologies

    Nordic Energy Technologies nBge A lIn A sustAInABle noRdIC eneRgy futuRe Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 energy Research and Innovation systems in The nordic Region 4 2.1 Describing Nordic Energy Innovation Systems 4 2.1.1 The Nordic Energy Mix 4 2.1.2 Energy Research and Innovation Systems in The Nordic Region 6 2.2 Assessing Nordic Energy Research and Innovation Systems 13 2.2.1 Framework Conditions 13 2.2.2 Energy Research and Innovation Performance 16 Publications, citations and patents 17 Technology deployment and diffusion 19 3 transnational Cooperation 23 3.1 Nordic Cooperation 23 3.2 Cooperation with Adjacent Areas 24 3.2.1 Cooperation with the Baltic Countries 24 3.2.2 European Research Area (ERA) 24 3.3 Emerging Economies 26 3.3.1 Russia 26 3.3.2 China 28 4 Concluding Remarks 30 5 Bibliography 32 Appendix 1: The noria-energy Project Portfolio 34 2 Nordic Energy Technologies ENABLING A SUSTAINABLE NORDIC ENERGY FUTURE Amund Vik and Benjamin Donald Smith, Nordic Energy Research LISTf o abbreViations CCS Carbon Capture and Storage CHP Combined Heat and Power COP15 UN Climate Summit in Copenhagen 2009 DTU Technical University of Denmark EPO European Patent Office ERA European Research Area ERA-NET European Research Area Network EU European Union EUDP Danish Energy Development and Demonstration Programme GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Green House Gasses IEA International Energy Agency IPCC UN International Panel on Climate Change IPR Intellectual Property Rights KTH Royal Institute of Technology NCM Nordic Council of Ministers NER Nordic
  • A Comparison of the Environmental Impact of Vertical Farming, Greenhouses and Food Import a Case Study for the Norwegian Vegetable Market

    A Comparison of the Environmental Impact of Vertical Farming, Greenhouses and Food Import a Case Study for the Norwegian Vegetable Market

    University College Ghent 2017 - 2018 Campus Mercator Henleykaai 84 9000 Ghent Hogeschool Gent Campus Mercator Oslo, 04.06.2018 Henleykaai 84 9000 Gent A comparison of the environmental impact of vertical farming, greenhouses and food import A case study for the Norwegian vegetable market Student: Klaus De Geyter Education: Business management Specialisation: Environmental Management Company: BySpire Thesis supervisor: Katrijn Cierkens © 2018, Klaus De Geyter. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in an automated database, or made public, in any form or by any means, be it electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or in any other way, without the prior written permission of the author. The use or reproduction of certain information from this work is only allowed for personal use and provided the source is acknowledged. Any use for commercial or advertising purposes is prohibited. This bachelor's thesis was made by Klaus De Geyter, a student at University College Ghent, to complete a Bachelor's degree in business management. The positions expressed in this bachelor's thesis are purely the personal point of view of the individual author and do not necessarily reflect the opinion, the official position or the policy of the University College Ghent. © 2018, Klaus De Geyter. Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand, of openbaar gemaakt, in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, door fotokopieën, opnamen of enige andere manier, zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de auteur. Het gebruik of de reproductie van bepaalde informatie uit dit werk is enkel toegestaan voor persoonlijk gebruik en mits bronvermelding.
  • Internasjonale Spillere - Menn

    Internasjonale Spillere - Menn

    INTERNASJONALE SPILLERE - MENN Adelskalender - ajour etter VM 2019 NORWEGIAN NATIONAL TEAM PLAYERS Kun VM og OL-kamper regnes som offisielle landskamper Ant.kamper Etternavn Fornavn Klubb - debut Debut i kamp nr. 139 Jakobsen Tommy Furuset IF 273 136 Trygg Mats IL Manglerud/Star 315 116 Bastiansen Anders IFK Arboga Hockey 376 114 Holøs Jonas IHK Sparta Sarpsborg 387 114 Marthinsen Jim Vålerengens IF 190 113 Martinsen Thor Frisk 74 113 Skrøder Per Åge Lillehammer IK 318 110 Hansen Mads Storhamar IL 342 105 Forsberg Kristian Storhamar Ishockey 393 102 Røymark Martin IHK Sparta Sarpsborg 399 101 Olimb Mathis Vålerenga Ishockey Elite 393 97 Kristiansen Erik Storhamar IL 209 96 Ask Morten Vålerenga Ishockey 352 96 Dahlstrøm Ole Eskild Furuset IF 249 96 Thoresen Petter Vålerengens IF 190 94 Thoresen Patrick Mörrums GoIS IK 371 92 Salsten Petter Furuset IF 230 88 Magnussen Trond Stjernen IL 280 88 Vikingstad Tore Stjenen Hockey 315 85 Bonsaksen Alexander Vålerenga Ishockey Elite 406 83 Løvdal Ørjan IL Stjernen 195 82 Trygg Marius IL Manglerud/Star 318 82 Schistad Robert Viking IHK 266 81 Røymark Tom IL Manglerud/Star 120 79 Olsen Per Skjerwen Vålerengens IF 42 78 Dalsøren Olav Frisk 40 77 Nørstebø Svein Enok Trondheim IK 280 75 Olimb Ken Andre IF Frisk Asker 419 75 Hoff Geir Furuset IF 223 73 Jansen Roy Vålerengens IF 110 72 Olsen Øystein IL VIF Ishockey 266 72 Petersen Christian SK Forward 43 72 Mikkelsen Arne Vålerengens IF 68 71 Sethereng Morten Frisk 132 69 Hansen Svein Normann Vålerengens IF 64 69 Goldstein Jørn IL Manglerud/Star 142 69 Bilkvam Arne Vålerengens IF 223 68 Spets Lars Erik Trondheim Ishockeyklubb 379 67 Molberg Rune IL Manglerud/Star 142 67 Ellingsen Åge Storhamar IL 209 66 Haugen Lars IL Manglerud Star Ishockey 425 63 Martinsen Andreas Lillehammer Ishockeyklubb 422 62 Smefjell Georg Frisk 40 62 Myrvold Anders Grums 299 62 Foyn Stephen IL Sparta 190 61 Østensen Kåre N.
  • Årsrapport 2011 Administrasjonen I Nit

    Årsrapport 2011 Administrasjonen I Nit

    Årsrapport 2011 Administrasjonen i NiT Et år i sterk vekst Administrasjonen i Næringsforeningen i Trondheim (NiT), fra venstre: Trygve Bragstad, Anne Grethe Smistad, Anne Kristin Stene, Berit Rian, Anne Kathrine Willumsen, Torgeir Sølsnes, Kenneth Stoltz. Jonny Gellein var fraværende da bildet ble tatt. Foto: Gry Karin Stimo Fredag 17. februar 2012 kl. 18.00 var det nøyaktig 150 år siden 47 areal, og styrket samarbeid mellom næringsliv, akademia og det kjøpmenn møttes for å etablere Trondhjems Handelsforening – i offentlige. dag Næringsforeningen i Trondheim. Fra den spede start i 1862 hadde NiT ved inngangen til Det manglet ikke på oppgaver å ta fatt på for den nystartede jubileums året hele 1.060 medlemsbedrifter, med til sammen foreningen: infrastruktur, transport, næringsareal, kapitaltilgang og 45.000 ansatte – en formidabel utvikling. Herværende årsrapport andre viktige rammevilkår for næringslivet – noe som skapte både speiler aktivitetsnivået i foreningen, som aldri har vært større og engasjement og meningsbrytninger. mer mangfoldig. Det er påfallende i hvor stor grad foreningen har arbeidet Vi takker alle våre medlemmer for tilliten, og ser frem til et med likeartede næringspolitiske saker gjennom tidene. Noen av fruktbart samarbeid også i årene som kommer! gjengangerne er handelens vilkår i Midtbyen versus handelssentra utenfor sentrum, parkeringsproblematikk, veiutbygging, transport, Berit Rian lokalisering av havn og godsterminal, behovet for mer nærings­ adm. direktør 2 Årsrapport 2011 Styret i Næringsforeningen Styret i 2011 Styret i Næringsforeningen i Trondheim, samlet i Børssalen i den gamle Telegrafbygningen. Rommets bruk er endret flere ganger, og huser i dag baren Tulla Fischer. Foran fra venstre Cathrine Tronstad i TrønderEnergi, Knut Efskin (styreleder) i DNB Næringsmegling, Ellen Tveit Klingenberg (nestleder) i Heimdal Gruppen, og May Britt Hansen i Trøndelag Reiseliv.
  • NVE Energibruksrapport 2011

    NVE Energibruksrapport 2011

    Energy consumption Energy consumption in mainland Norway 4 2012 RAPPORT Ressursfordeling 1:300 Utbygd Gitt tillatelse/under bygging Står att, utbyggbart Verna Verneplan 1 : 2 000 000 0 80 160 km Energy consumption Energy consumption in mainland Norway Report no. 9/2011 Energy consumption, energy consumption in mainland Norway Published by: Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate Edited by: Energy consumption division Author: Ingrid H. Magnussen, Dag Spilde and Magnus Killingland Printed: in-house Circulation: Cover photo: Graphic by Rune Stubrud, NVE ISBN: 978-82-410-0782-8 Keywords: Energy consumption, energy consumption in mainland Norway Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate Middelthunsgate 29 P.O. Box 5091 Majorstua 0301 OSLO Phone: 22 95 95 95 Fax: 22 95 90 00 Website: www.nve.no May 2011 2 Glossary Term Explanation Norwegian Water Resources and Energy NVE Directorate Consumption of all types of energy products Energy consumption (electricity, district heating, oil, gas etc.) Electricity Electrical power, electrical energy Energy consumed in buildings, industry and Final energy consumption transport in mainland Norway. Excludes energy consumed in the energy sector. Gross energy consumption in mainland Total of final energy consumption and energy Norway consumption in the energy sector. Producers, distributors, retailers etc. of energy, Energy sector oil, gas, district heating, electrical power etc. Producers, distributors, retailers etc. of oil, gas Petroleum sector and refined petroleum products. Energy used in buildings, industrial processes Stationary energy consumption and in the energy sector. Energy for motorised vehicles and means of Energy consumption in transport transport. All types of passenger and goods transport, Transport both private and commercial.
  • Uke 46: 14.11. - 16.11

    Uke 46: 14.11. - 16.11

    Uke 46: 14.11. - 16.11. 2017 Kl Nr Kamp Odds kan endres S H U B Serie TV Kl Nr Kamp Odds kan endres S H U B Serie TV Tirsdag 14. november 19.40 64 Lausanne HC - HC Ambri Piotta S 1,95 4,20 2,50 SVIS 10.25 1 Admiral Vladivostok - SKA St. Petersburg S 5,60 5,00 1,30 KHL 65 SCL Tigers - HC Davos S 2,40 4,10 2,05 11.55 2 Sør-Korea - Serbia S 2,35 3,05 2,55 PLFM 19.55 66 Romania - Nederland S 3,00 3,00 2,10 PLFM 3 Armenia - Serbia 7,50 4,80 1,20 EMU21-7 67 Romania - Nederland Handikap 1-0 1,57 3,45 4,00 12.25 4 HC Red Star Kunlun - OHK Dynamo Moskva S 1,90 3,70 2,85 KHL 20.10 68 Ungarn - Costa Rica S 2,20 3,00 2,80 12.30 5 Kina - Colombia S 6,75 3,65 1,38 PLFM 20.25 69 Burkina Faso - Kapp Verde S 2,00 2,85 3,50 VMK 6 Kina - Colombia Handikap 1-0 2,35 3,20 2,30 70 Senegal - Sør-Afrika S 1,35 3,80 7,50 12.55 7 FYR Makedonia - Østerrike 3,95 3,35 1,60 EMU21-7 71 Skottland - Ukraina 2,20 3,10 2,50 EMU21-4 14.55 8 Aserbajdsjan - Kosovo 2,50 3,35 2,10 EMU21-5 20.40 249 Irland - Danmark S 2,70 2,80 2,60 VMK MAX 9 Tyrkia - Belgia 2,50 3,05 2,30 EMU21-6 73 Irland - Danmark Over/Under mål 2.5 over/under S 2,50 1,36 10 Kypros - Ungarn 3,10 3,10 1,88 72 Irland - Danmark Lag videre? h/b S 2,15 1,55 15.55 11 Moldova - Tsjekkia 7,50 4,50 1,22 EMU21-1 74 Irland - Danmark Handikap 0-1 6,00 3,85 1,35 12 Georgia - Litauen 1,80 3,00 3,50 EMU21-3 75 Irland - Danmark Handikap 1-0 1,40 3,75 5,50 16.55 13 Estland - Island 3,00 3,05 1,95 EMU21-2 76 Irland - Danmark Begge lag scorer ja/nei S 2,15 1,50 14 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod - Avtomobilist Yekaterinbur S 1,95 3,70
  • TEAM ROSTER As of 06.04.2008 NOR - Norway

    TEAM ROSTER As of 06.04.2008 NOR - Norway

    ICE HOCKEY IIHF World U18 Championship DIV I Group B, MEN TEAM ROSTER As of 06.04.2008 NOR - Norway Shoots/ Height Weight No Name Pos Date of Birth Club Registration Catches m / ft in kg / lbs 1 BARIAAS Emil GK L 1.84 / 6'0'' 75 / 165 09 MAR 1990 SaiPa Lappeenranta 01 APR 2008 12 ERBE Joakim F L 1.85 / 6'1'' 81 / 179 22 MAY 1990 Lillehammer IK 01 APR 2008 5 GUNDERSRUD Marius D L 1.84 / 6'0'' 89 / 196 13 OCT 1990 Frisk Asker 01 APR 2008 25 HOLM Henrik GK R 1.83 / 6'0'' 75 / 165 06 SEP 1990 Lillehammer IK 01 APR 2008 10 JACOBSEN Lystad Fredrik F L 1.78 / 5'10'' 77 / 170 15 FEB 1990 Frisk Asker 05 APR 2008 2 JENSEN Daniel D L 1.80 / 5'11'' 84 / 185 25 APR 1990 Valerenga Oslo 01 APR 2008 13 JOHANNESSEN Simen F L 1.84 / 6'0'' 80 / 176 20 FEB 1990 Storhamar IL Hamar 01 APR 2008 14 KILLINGSTAD Peter Even F L 1.82 / 6'0'' 73 / 161 26 JUL 1990 Frisk Asker 01 APR 2008 16 LERENG Jan Robin F L 1.83 / 6'0'' 77 / 170 05 DEC 1990 Lillehammer IK 01 APR 2008 18 LOVLIE Jonas F L 1.86 / 6'1'' 85 / 187 14 OCT 1990 Manglerud Star Oslo 01 APR 2008 7 MADSO Kenneth D L 1.77 / 5'10'' 73 / 161 25 JAN 1991 Lillehammer IK 01 APR 2008 17 MARTINSEN Andreas F L 1.90 / 6'3'' 89 / 196 13 JUN 1990 Lillehammer IK 01 APR 2008 15 OLSEN Mats F L 1.81 / 5'11'' 74 / 163 29 APR 1991 Furuset IF 01 APR 2008 21 OPPOYEN Jonas F L 1.76 / 5'9'' 75 / 165 20 JAN 1991 Valerenga Oslo 01 APR 2008 23 REISS JACOBSEN Jorgen F L 1.74 / 5'9'' 66 / 145 04 FEB 1990 Lillehammer IK 01 APR 2008 6 SKAARBERG Tobias D R 1.73 / 5'8'' 74 / 163 19 JAN 1991 IHK Sparta Sarpsborg 01 APR 2008 24 SOMMERSETH
  • The Future of the Nordic Energy Markets

    The Future of the Nordic Energy Markets

    TABLE OF CONTENTS STRONGER TOGETHER: THE FUTURE OF THE NORDIC ENERGY MARKETS CopyrightA report © Nordic West by Office Nordic 2019. All rights West reserved. Office with input from industry representatives 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................... 6 INTRODUCTION ................................... 12 THEME 1: POWER SUPPLY AND FLEXIBILITY ...... 16 THEME 2: ADVANCED FUELS AND TRANSPORT .. 24 THEME 3: EFFICIENT INTEGRATED ENERGY SYSTEMS .............................................. 31 THEME 4: EU ENERGY UNION AND NORDIC SOLUTIONS .......................................... 39 CLOSING REMARKS ............................. 43 ANNEX: CASE CATALOGUE ................. 45 FOREWORD FOREWORD Climate change is one of the major challenges of our time and for better or for worse, energy plays a key role in it. In 2013, 72% of global greenhouse gas emissions were caused by the energy sector, including energy used for electricity and heating, manufacturing, construction and transportation1. However, a large-scale energy transition is taking place. The world is reducing its dependence on fossil-fuel based energy resources, such as oil and coal, and moving towards low-carbon solutions, harnessing renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power, bio energy and hydropower. Enabled by the advancement of technology and energy in Norway’s gross final energy consumption the associated decline in costs, this transition is was 69.4%5. The relative share of renewable energy progressing rapidly. According to the International in Sweden’s transport fuel consumption in 2017 was Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), one-third 38.6%, and in Finland 18.8% – both well above the of the world’s power capacity in 2018 was from common EU target of 10%6. renewable sources, and nearly two-thirds of the capacity added in 2018 was of renewable origin2.
  • Annual Report 2014 Financial Key Fgures

    Annual Report 2014 Financial Key Fgures

    Annual Report 2014 Financial key fgures Statkraft AS Group Unit 2014 2013 2012 (restated) 2011 2010 From the income statement Gross operating revenues***** NOK mill 52 254 49 564 37 550 22 449 29 252 Net operating revenues NOK mill 25 805 24 246 18 352 17 161 23 176 EBITDA NOK mill 17 631 16 047 10 492 9 795 15 955 Operating proft NOK mill 13 560 13 002 5 559 6 218 12 750 Share of proft from associates NOK mill 661 1 101 871 898 766 Net fnancial items NOK mill -6 283 -11 592 2 341 -3 642 -917 Proft before tax NOK mill 7 937 2 511 8 771 3 466 12 599 Net proft NOK mill 3 892 208 4 551 40 7 451 Items exluded from underlying business** Unrealised changes in value energy contracts NOK mill 2 396 3 288 -1 030 -1 152 62 Non-recurring items NOK mill 2 053 125 -2 224 -1 035 70 Underlying business** Gross operating revenues NOK mill 48 348 47 458 38 910 22 377 28 990 Net operating revenues NOK mill 20 602 20 545 19 207 18 187 22 721 EBITDA NOK mill 12 132 12 444 11 347 10 880 15 161 Operating proft NOK mill 9 111 9 589 8 813 8 405 12 618 From the balance sheet Property, plant & equipment and intangible assets NOK mill 102 638 104 779 91 788 88 331 80 772 Investments in associates NOK mill 19 027 16 002 15 924 15 080 17 090 Other assets NOK mill 46 152 32 906 38 195 41 514 58 105 Total assets NOK mill 167 817 153 687 145 907 144 925 155 967 Total equity NOK mill 88 059 71 107 62 350 65 655 75 302 Interest-bearing debt NOK mill 36 744 40 377 40 625 37 287 40 486 Capital employed, basic 1) NOK mill 82 244 82 985 71 282 62 546 66 722 Cash flow Net change in cash fow from operating activities NOK mill 6 898 8 106 10 290 9 521 13 577 Dividend for the year to owner (incl.
  • Annual Report 2012

    Annual Report 2012

    Annual Report 2012 Content Part 1 About Statkraft Part 3 Financial Statements 4 Letter from the CEO 47 Group Financial Statements 5 Statkraft Group Management 48 Statement of Comprehensive Income 6 Statkraft at a glance 49 Balance Sheet 8 Growth from hydropower 50 Statement of Cash Flow 10 International growth with pure energy 51 Statement of Changes in Equity 13 Offshore power 52 Notes 14 Wind power with the wind at its back 16 Statkraft in facts and figures 99 Statkraft AS Financial Statements 18 Statkraft around the world 100 Income statement 101 Balance Sheet Part 2 Report from the Board of Directors 102 Statement of Cash Flow 102 Notes 116 Auditor’s Report 119 Corporate Responsibility Statement 120 Statement 128 Auditor’s Statement Read the full report at: annualreport2012.statkraft.com Financial key figures Non-financial key figures The following tables present Statkraft’s most significant results within the areas environmental impact, health and safety, society and employees for the Statkraft AS Group Unit 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 From the income statement period 2008-2012. More detailed results can be found in the corporate responsibility statement. Gross operating revenues***** NOK mill 32 331 22 203 29 252 25 675 25 061 a Net operating revenues NOK mill 17 659 17 094 23 176 16 983 23 601 Power generation and district heating production b EBITDA NOK mill 9 908 9 767 15 955 9 769 18 171 Unit 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Operating profit NOK mill 5 365 6 203 12 750 7 027 16 618 Installed capacity MW 16 967 16 430 16 010 15 806 15 478
  • Renewable Energy Respecting Nature

    Renewable Energy Respecting Nature

    Renewable energy respecting nature A synthesis of knowledge on environmental impacts of renewable energy financed by the Research Council of Norway Roel May Kjetil Bevanger Jiska van Dijk Zlatko Petrin Hege Brende NINA Publications NINA Report (NINA Rapport) This is a electronic series beginning in 2005, which replaces the earlier series NINA commissioned reports and NINA project reports. This will be NINA’s usual form of reporting completed research, monitoring or review work to clients. In addition, the series will include much of the institute’s other reporting, for example from seminars and conferences, results of internal research and review work and literature studies, etc. NINA report may also be issued in a second language where appropriate. NINA Special Report (NINA Temahefte) As the name suggests, special reports deal with special subjects. Special reports are produced as required and the series ranges widely: from systematic identification keys to information on important problem areas in society. NINA special reports are usually given a popular scientific form with more weight on illustrations than a NINA report. NINA Factsheet (NINA Fakta) Factsheets have as their goal to make NINA’s research results quickly and easily accessible to the general public. The are sent to the press, civil society organisations, nature management at all levels, politicians, and other special interests. Fact sheets give a short presentation of some of our most important research themes. Other publishing In addition to reporting in NINA’s own series, the institute’s employees publish a large proportion of their scientific results in international journals, popular science books and magazines.
  • Investigation Into the Metamorphic Nappes of the Central

    Investigation Into the Metamorphic Nappes of the Central

    ?//»"/* -*H^- '•>.- ••- • •'<[• ••••- INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE METAMORPHIC NAPPES OF THE CENTRAL SCANDINAVWW CALHX>NID€S ON THE BASIS OF -^ .., "1>' <••• •^•"^ >• •••- --•• •<;'••"• :># ^-^>--•'-}:.i«^^^ ^fV *^i ÖTEI.I.INÜKN l. Het gedrag van Rb-Sr "whole rooK" systemen in Ktiatcuntun, die <1oor metamorfose vn deformatie zijn beïnvloed, is utivu Idamuiu onderzocht 2, Stratigraf lache correlaties In het Kolt dekblad op tuint H vnn een zo- genaamde "chemische vingerafdruk" vun vulkanincliu af*«ttIngen ver- dienen de voorkeur boven die, waarbij van cun«lomuruiun t>n marmers gebruik gemaakt wordt. In regionaal metamorfe gebieden kan het niet ontlttrkonni'i) van poly- metaraorfose tot een verkeerde interpretatie van du mui amorfe facies leiden. 4, Een ouderdom van 418 Ma voor de grens Ordovicium/Siluur, zoals be- rekend- door Gale et al. is onjuist. Gale, N.H., BecMnaale, R.P, S Vadge, A.J. 1979: A Rb-Sr whole rook isoohvon for the Stockdale Rhyolite. of the English lake Di a triât and a revised mid-Palaeosoia time-eonle, Journ, geol. Soa. Lond. S. Ultramylonieten en pseudotachylieten ontstaan op vrij geringe diepte en kunnen derhulve geen "cryptische aiituur" uunKtiy/en Dewey, J.F. & Burke, CA, W/$> Tibetan, Vaviaaan and Precuvnbrian baniismütit vwt io-.it ton: products of aontinental <.s>{liiu\>n,Jiwn. &W. W7, t'ii.i-i>i>2. 6. Gezien het belang voor vele geologische lnterprelut U-s «Itent isotopen- geochronologle een onderdeel te vormen van hot doitoraa)programma voor geologen. 7. Het verdient aanbeveling om, naast Engels, Fraim un Dulls weor als ver- plichte eindexaaenvakker. In het VWO in te voeron. 8. Indien na het rijbewijs voor voertuigen in de toekomat oen vaarbewijs voor gemotoriseerde vaartuigen vereist val zijn, lijkt ilt< nood.'.aak van een loopbewijs voor voetgangers Proefschrift APS.