Technology Technology General Introduction Retail Legislation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Government Chemist Legislation
Government Chemist legislation Annual statement of statutory scope January 2016 LGC/R/2016/439 Government Chemist legislation Annual statement of statutory scope January 2016 Prepared by: Nick Boley Contact Points: Nick Boley Tel: 020 8943 7311 Michael Walker Tel: 07738 179 985 LGC/R/2016/439 © LGC Limited 2016 Contents 1. Summary 1 2. Introduction 1 2.1 Inputs 2 2.2 Document outline 3 3. Referee analysis 3 3.1 Food Safety Act 1990 4 3.2 Agriculture Act 1970 23 3.3 Medicines Act 1968 38 3.4 Farm and Garden Chemicals Act 1967 40 4. Authorised analysis 47 4.1 Hydrocarbon Oil Duties Act 1979 47 5. Expert advice 48 5.1 Poisons Act 1972 48 5.2 Merchant Shipping Act 1995 49 6. Framework legislation 51 6.1 General 51 6.2 Scotland 51 6.3 Northern Ireland 52 6.4 Commonwealth 53 7. Conclusion 53 LGC/R/2016/439 Page i 1. Summary The Government Chemist currently has specific statutory functions under seven Acts of the UK Parliament. This statement is an updated record of legislation that is now in force and names the Government Chemist, or relates to the way in which the Government Chemist needs to exercise these functions. For ease of reference, Table 1 lists the main changes to the statement since the last update in January 2015. Table 1: Main changes to this paper since the January 2015 version Legislation Section Change Food 3.1.5 Country of Origin of Meats 3.1.7 New Natural Mineral Water, Spring Water and Bottled Drinking Water for the 4 home countries Agriculture - The Animal Feed (Hygiene, Sampling etc. -
The Pharmacy Order 2010
SI 2010/231 Page 1 2010 No. 231 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS The Pharmacy Order 2010 Thomson Reuters (Legal) Limited. UK Statutory Instruments Crown Copyright. Reproduced by permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Made 10th February 2010 Coming into force in accordance with article 1 At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 10th day of February 2010 Present, The Queen's Most Excellent Majesty in Council This Order in Council is made in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 60 and 62(4) and (4A) of, and Schedule 3 to, the Health Act 19991 as read with paragraph 1A of Schedule 2 to the European Communities Act 19722 . This Order makes provision for a purpose mentioned in section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 and it appears to Her Majesty, with the advice of Her Privy Council, that it is necessary for the reference to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications3 to be construed as a reference to that Directive as amended from time to time. The Secretary of State and the Scottish Ministers published a draft Order and invited representations as required by paragraph 9(1) and (3) of Schedule 3 to the Health Act 1999. The period of three months mentioned in paragraph 9(4) of that Schedule expired before a draft of this Order in Council was laid before Parliament and the Scottish Parliament. A draft of this Order in Council has been approved by resolution of each House of Parliament and the Scottish Parliament in accordance with section 62(10) of the Health Act 1999. -
The Economic Costs and Benefits of Easing Sunday Shopping Restrictions on Large Stores in England and Wales
The economic costs and benefits of easing Sunday shopping restrictions on large stores in England and Wales Brian Williamson, John Hargreaves, Justine Bond and Helen Lay A report for the Department of Trade and Industry May 2006 Indepen Consulting Ltd Diespeker Wharf, 38 Graham Street, London N1 8JX T +44 (0) 20 7324 1800 F +44 (0) 20 7253 4949 www.indepen.co.uk The economic costs and benefits of easing Sunday shopping restrictions on large stores Indepen is a management and economic consultancy. We understand and have experience of government, regulation and investors, as well as business and other forms of enterprise. We work to make business sense out of better regulation to produce better results for all stakeholders, and improved services for everybody. We use our knowledge to challenge constructively and our thinking is independent, distinctive and rigorous. We work in this way to promote both public and private value, with clients in the UK, EU and elsewhere in the world. Further information can be found at www.indepen.co.uk. © Indepen, 2006 i The economic costs and benefits of easing Sunday shopping restrictions on large stores Table of Contents Executive Summary...............................................................................................................................1 1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................4 1.1 Scope of the report .................................................................................................................4 -
Poisons Act 1972 CHAPTER 66 ARRANGEMENT of SECTIONS
Poisons Act 1972 CHAPTER 66 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Poisons Board. 2. Poisons List. 3. Regulation of sale of poisons. 4. Exclusion of sales by wholesale and certain other sales. 5. Lists of persons entitled to sell poisons in Part II of Poisons List. 6. Supplementary provisions as to local authorities' lists. 7. Poisons Rules. 8. Penalties. 9. Inspection and enforcement. 10. Orders and rules. 11. Interpretation. 12. Repeals and consequential provisions. 13. Commencement and transitional provisions. 14. Short title and extent. SCHEDULES : Schedule 1-Constitution of Poisons Board. Schedule 2-Enactments repealed. c. 66 1 ELIZABETH II Poisons Act 1972 1972 CHAPTER 66 An Act to consolidate certain enactments relating to A.D. 1972 poisons. [9th August 1972] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows :- L---(1) There shall continue to be an advisory committee, poisons called the Poisons Board, which shall be constituted in accord- Board. ance with the provisions of Schedule 1 to this Act. (2) The procedure of the Poisons Board shall (subject to any regulations made by the Board with the approval of the Secre- tary of State) be such as the Board may determine. 2.-(1) The list of substances treated as poisons for the Poisons List. purposes of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1933 shall continue 1933 c. 25, to have effect for the purposes of this Act. (2) The Secretary of State may from time to time, after con- sultation with or on the recommendation of the Poisons Board, by order amend or vary the list referred to in subsection (1) above as he thinks proper ; and in this Act the list as in force for the time being is referred to as " the Poisons List ". -
Sunday Trading for the 21 Century
Sunday Trading for the 21st Century A New Study into Saving the Great British High Street by localising Sunday Trading Rules A British Infrastructure Group (BIG) Report by The Rt. Hon Grant Shapps MP Published: 21st February 2016 Page 1 of 23 Who is the British Infrastructure Group (BIG)? The British Infrastructure Group (BIG) is led by The Rt Hon Grant Shapps MP and brings together cross-party Members of Parliament dedicated to promoting better infrastructure across the entire United Kingdom. Each report it releases focusses on a different area of current or future infrastructure need. An individual MP’s support is distinct to the particular subject and report under research. BIG is about ensuring every opportunity for growth is seized with bold new ideas and recommendations, backed by authoritative research and evidence. At its core, the British Infrastructure Group firmly believes that Britain should lead the world in cutting edge policy developments and infrastructure investment in order to drive forward our economy for the benefit of both this and future generations. It is in this spirit that the British Infrastructure Group publishes its second report, ‘Sunday Trading: Saving the Great British High Street’. This research highlights the overwhelmingly positive benefits that relaxing Sunday trading laws will have for high streets across the UK. It argues that the current situation of limiting the hours that shops larger than 280 square metres can open for is archaic and preventing high street retailers from competing more fairly against online shops. It also limits consumer choice and reduces flexibility. With UK shoppers turning ever more to the internet to satisfy their flexible and convenient shopping needs it no longer makes sense for large shops to be restrained by limiting their opening hours. -
Fourteenth Report: Draft Statute Law Repeals Bill
The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 211) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 140) STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTEENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor and the Lord Advocate by Command of Her Majesty April 1993 LONDON: HMSO E17.85 net Cm 2176 The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the Law. The Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Mr. Justice Brooke, Chairman Mr Trevor M. Aldridge, Q.C. Mr Jack Beatson Mr Richard Buxton, Q.C. Professor Brenda Hoggett, Q.C. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Collon. Its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WClN 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Lord Davidson, Chairman .. Dr E.M. Clive Professor P.N. Love, C.B.E. Sheriff I.D.Macphail, Q.C. Mr W.A. Nimmo Smith, Q.C. The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Mr K.F. Barclay. Its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. .. 11 THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTEENTH REPORT Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill To the Right Honourable the Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourable the Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Q.C., Her Majesty's Advocate. In pursuance of section 3(l)(d) of the Law Commissions Act 1965, we have prepared the draft Bill which is Appendix 1 and recommend that effect be given to the proposals contained in it. -
House of Lords Official Report
Vol. 756 Tuesday No. 47 28 October 2014 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDER OF BUSINESS Introductions: Baroness Evans of Bowes Park and Lord Cashman..........................1059 Questions Railways: East Coast Rail Franchise.........................................................................1059 Health: Mental Health................................................................................................1062 Unemployment: Young People ...................................................................................1064 Parliament Square: Occupy Protests ..........................................................................1066 Draft Protection of Charities Bill Motion to Agree ..........................................................................................................1068 Infrastructure Bill [HL] Order of Consideration Motion...................................................................................1069 Serious Crime Bill [HL] Report (2nd Day) .......................................................................................................1069 Music Education Question for Short Debate ..........................................................................................1171 Grand Committee Deregulation Bill Committee (2nd Day) ...........................................................................................GC 369 Written Statements ....................................................................................................WS 105 Written -
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
Monday Volume 583 23 June 2014 No. 11 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 23 June 2014 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2014 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON.DAVID CAMERON,MP,MAY 2010) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. David Cameron, MP DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL—The Rt Hon. Nick Clegg, MP FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. William Hague, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. George Osborne, MP CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE TREASURY—The Rt Hon. Danny Alexander, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,INNOVATION AND SKILLS—The Rt Hon. Vince Cable, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Iain Duncan Smith, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. Chris Grayling, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Michael Gove, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT—The Rt Hon. Eric Pickles, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH—The Rt Hon. Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. Owen Paterson, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT—The Rt Hon. -
Enhancing Consumer Confidence Through Effective Enforcement
ENHANCING CONSUMER CONFIDENCE THROUGH EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT Supplementary Legislative Document for the Consultation on consolidating and modernising consumer law enforcement powers MARCH 2012 Supplementary document for Enhancing consumer confidence through effective enforcement 2 Supplementary document for Enhancing consumer confidence through effective enforcement Contents Table 1: List of enforcement bodies within the scope of this consultation.......................................4 Table 2: Details of legislative provisions to be repealed or amended ...............................................5 Table 3: Enhanced powers of seizure under section 50 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 ........................................................................................................................................................13 Table 4: List of product safety powers to be included with generic set ..........................................15 Table 5: List of specific weights and measures powers to be included with the generic set........16 Table 6: Details of changes to obstruction offence ...........................................................................18 3 Supplementary document for Enhancing consumer confidence through effective enforcement Table 1: List of enforcement bodies within the scope of this consultation The following enforcement bodies have powers under the legislation within the scope of this consultation: 1. Office of Fair Trading (OFT); 2. Local weights and measures authorities in Great Britain -
December 2013
Index January – December 2013 CONTENTS Subject Index 2 UK Statutes 26 Statutory Instruments 28 International Legislation 29 Law Reports 32 Table of Cases 34 Author Index 52 Book and Online Reviews 56 Glossary 56 2 SUBJECT INDEX www.newlawjournal.co.uk | January – December Index 2013 | New Law Journal Numbers in bold refer to issue use of ADR to resolve landlord and how courts deal with question of costs numbers, followed by page numbers tenant disputes (ADR) 7573:21 where an arbitration award is being CAS refers to the who pays the mediator (judicial line) 7557:19 challenged 7554:14–15 Charities Appeals Supplement America jurisdiction of High Court under American Bar Association and external Arbitration Act 1969 (law digest) 7565:29 ownership of law firms (comment) 7588:8 local court is free to impose its own A American Bar Association to permit procedural conditions (law digest) 7583:17 foreign lawyers to practise as in- negative aspect of a London arbitration abuse of process house counsel 7549:182 (law digest) 7565:29 former wife’s claim was abuse of process 7560:4 animals points needed to succeed under s.68 access to justice dangerous dogs and destruction orders Arbitration Act 1996 (law digest) 7581:29 access to justice debate (comment) 7543:7 (law digest) 7588:21 seat of arbitration sufficiently indicated age anti-social behaviour by the country chosen as the place former partner in law firm loses age proposals in new legislation to of arbitration (law digest) 7550:237 discrimination claim 7563:4 introduce statutory injunctions -
House of Lords Official Report
Vol. 760 Wednesday No. 112 4 March 2015 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDER OF BUSINESS Questions Legislative Scrutiny: Digitalisation ....................................................................................................................................................211 Sudan: Bombardment of Civilians ..................................................................................................................................................213 Regulatory Agencies: Monitoring......................................................................................................................................................216 Defence Budget ...................................................................................................................................................................................217 National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015........................................................................................................................................220 Groceries Code Adjudicator (Permitted Maximum Financial Penalty) Order 2015 ....................................................................220 Electronic Commerce Directive (Financial Services and Markets) (Amendment) Order 2015 ..................................................221 Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Miscellaneous Provisions) Order 2015....................................................................221 Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Banking Reform) (Pensions) -
BIS Powers of Entry Review: Final Report
BIS Powers of Entry Review Final Report NOVEMBER 2014 Powers of Entry Review: final report 2 Powers of Entry Review: final report Contents 1. Introduction by Minister…………………………………………………………………….........4 2. Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………….5 3. Context of Review …………………………………………………………………………………7 4. Reporting/analysis of the review of each power of entry……………………………….....9 4.1 Powers of entry that have already been repealed / revoked or are due to be repealed / revoked ............................................................................................................................. 9 4.1.1 Powers of entry that have been repealed………………………………………………9 4.1.2 Powers of entry that will be repealed…………………………………………………..10 4.1.3 Powers of entry that have been superseded………………………………………….10 4.2 Powers of entry to be consolidated………………………………………………………….12 4.2.1 Legislation to be consolidated by the Consumer Rights Bill 2014………………….12 4.2.2 Competition powers being consolidated…………...................................................13 4.3 Powers of entry to be retained with additional safeguards. .... ………………………….17 4.4 Powers of entry to be retained unchanged ................................................. ………….33 Annex A ....................................................................................................................................... 39 3 Powers of Entry Review: final report 1. Introduction by Minister The Government recognises the importance of respecting human rights and is committed to preserving the rights of individuals in their homes and businesses from unnecessary intrusion. The intention of Government is very clear: It is essential that powers of entry achieve the right balance between the need to enforce the law and ensure public protection and to provide sufficient safeguards and rights to the individual. As a result of this public authorities should have fewer powers to enter people’s homes and the privacy and rights of homeowners and businesses should be protected and strengthened wherever possible.