An Exploration of the Three Major Schools of Taxonomy Using Science Fiction Examples

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Exploration of the Three Major Schools of Taxonomy Using Science Fiction Examples AN EXPLORATION OF THE THREE MAJOR SCHOOLS OF TAXONOMY USING SCIENCE FICTION EXAMPLES A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Masters of Arts By Jessica Gentry Read December, 2009 Thesis written by Jessica Gentry Read B.A., Washington and Jefferson College, 1998 M.A., Kent State University, 2009 Approved by ________Deborah Barnbaum___________, Advisor ________David W. Odell-Scott_________, Chair, Department of Philosophy _______Timothy Moerland____________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………..iv Introduction………………………………………………………………………...1 Chapter 1. Definitions and Explanations of Terms………………………………...4 Definition of Taxonomy and Related Terms………………………4 Virtues of a School of Taxonomy………………………………...10 Definition of Species……………………………………………...17 Definition of Character……………………………………………30 Definition of Grouping and Ranking……………………………...37 2. Evolutionary Taxonomy……………………………………………….39 Goals and Tenets of Evolutionary Taxonomy…………………….40 3. Cladism………………………………………………………………...54 Goals and Tenets of Cladism……………………………………...54 Advantages and Disadvantages of Cladism……………………….71 4. Pheneticism…………………………………………………………….73 Goals and Tenets of Pheneticism………………………………….74 Pheneticism and Aristotle………………………………………….81 Advantages and Disadvantages of Pheneticism…………………....84 5. Testing the Schools of Taxonomy Using Science Fiction……………....90 Science Fiction and its Purpose…………………………………….92 Eugenically Developed Humans…………………………………..100 Asexually Developed Humans…………………………………….108 “Built” Humans……………………………………………………113 “Half” Humans…………………………………………………….130 Final Conclusions………………………………………………….135 Works Cited………………………………………………………………………..140 Illustration A……………………………………………………………………….147 Illustration B……………………………………………………………………….148 iii Acknowledgments Last year I was able to present a part of this thesis to the philosophy club at my undergraduate alma mater, Washington and Jefferson College. I am thankful for the opportunity to practice and for the welcome back despite being unknown to the completely new department from when I was last a student. But most of all, upon lamenting on my difficulty in finishing, all members related similar experiences. While I do not recommend anyone take my long road more than peppered with breaks and hiatuses, I at least feel confident that my struggles here is not a sign to end my philosophical endeavors. A great deal of gratitude is owed and offered to those who helped me while a student at Kent State. In general, the department provides a gold standard in leading class discussion and exciting students about philosophy. I treasure that I have been a part of that. Specifically, I must start with endless gratitude for my advisor, Dr. Barnbaum. Your patience and empathy is endless. You criticism has always been constructive, your aid extensive and your interest is genuine. I can honestly say I could not have completed this without you. Many thanks go to the rest of the philosophy department at Kent State and especially the other members of my Thesis Advisory Group. You comments, questions and ideas are always helpful. iv Special thanks for Dr. Williams for the best of advice: Just do it. I would have finished years ago if I took that excellent advice to heart. And although years have passed and I have lost contact with nearly all of them, I still owe a debt of gratitude to my fellow graduate students. In particular, I want to thank Kevin Fink for being my “go-to guy” on realism and anti-realism and whether or when it may apply to my work. And I want to thank Dave Mast for being my kindred spirit in the pursuit of classifying, identifying, and naming all things that can stand it – everything in its place. I want to thank Jody Price for his unabashed commentary on this thesis and just about everything else. Finally, I want to thank Steve Carr for being the incredibly supportive person that he is. I would have never made it to Kent without the aid and advice of Dr. David Schrader. And I may have never gotten as enthralled about philosophy without W&J’s own embodiment of Socrates, Dr. Lloyd Mitchell. Finally, all my love and thank to my husband Michael, who kept the farm going while I was in school, and encouraged and supported me throughout. v Introduction When informing others on the topic of my thesis, I got many of the same responses of the general form, “What does that have to do with philosophy?” I found this to be an odd response. As a philosopher, I found much of my studies and works akin to the work of a biological taxonomist. Philosophy is no stranger to classification. While the biologist categorizes, names, and identifies kinds of life, many philosophers categorize, name and identify numerous kinds of entities and concepts, for example speech acts or ethical theories. Science fiction is an ideal bridge between biology and philosophy. Science fiction is a speculative art. Its speculation is often in the form of expanding current scientific theory and technology, including biology. The benefit of a philosopher, as opposed to a biologist, exploring the nature of biological taxonomy is as with any outsider coming to mediate among those involved. I will bring a different point of view and background to the issues at hand, hopefully lacking biases that can develop from being a biologist. Problems in taxonomy may also be problems that are dealt in philosophy, which may offer a new approach. For example, identification of a population as a distinct species may have to face a heap problem, such as, in the earlier stages of evolution the population are easily identified as a preexisting, but later becomes a divergent species. Exactly when did the speciation occur? There are three approaches to classifying life in biology, that is, three kinds of taxonomy: evoultionary taxonomy, cladism and phenticism. Cladism focuses on the evolutionary tree of life, the where and how an organism is placed in the system depends 1 2 on its historical relationships with other organisms and only on these relationships. Evolutionary taxonomy balances this focus on historical relationships with the degrees organisms have diverged from one another. Pheneticism looks to how much or how little organisms share overall similarity with other organisms as opposed with only looking at a few, key features. My task is to look at these three schools of taxonomy. Do they adequately fulfill their needs of classification and meet their goals? Does one fulfill its goals better? Is one more useful? Is one more correct than the others? I will consider these concerns by first reviewing rules of each school as set forth by their proponents. I will also look at commonly cited advantages and disadvantages of each school. Specific methods and practices are beyond the scope of this thesis. I am only looking at the theoretical bases of these schools of taxonomy. To attempt to do more makes for a massive undertaking, and it is more than I can accomplish here. One chapter will be devoted to each school of taxonomy. Before exploring each school, I will offer a first chapter explaining many terms needed in a discussion on biological taxonomy. These terms will be common among all three schools of taxonomy. The final chapter is dedicated to a final question I have for biological taxonomy: “How does each school respond to anomalies?” Exceptions, anomalies, and problem cases will be regularly found when classifying life and each school should have some means of response. These anomalies can reveal some benefits and weaknesses of the school of taxonomy used. I will turn to science fiction as a source of biological anomalies, as it is rife with them. These examples are particularly strange and difficult to 3 classify. If a school of taxonomy can deal with cyborgs, alien-human hybrids, and engineered societies then it is likely to be able to manage the diversity offered by contemporary earth. If a school cannot respond to these examples, then they will show why and how this may be worked around if necessary. These examples will illustrate which school produces the most useful classifications. Chapter 1 Definitions and Explanation of Terms Before discussion begins of any particular school of taxonomy, a review of commonly shared terms will help in subsequent chapters. These terms are central to taxonomy, and some are more problematic than others are. Definition of Taxonomy and Related Terms Taxonomy fulfills an important role for biology, and it aids all other fields of biology. Successful taxonomy aids in successful biology. Taxonomy provides a consistent naming system for all other fields of biology and lay naturalists, and a comprehensive expression of the diversity of and relationships among all life. Taxonomy incorporates as much information from all other biological fields as possible. A closer look at what taxonomy is and what it produces will help clarify the importance of this field. There are also other related terms that must be made clear to aid my following work. In particular, definitions of ‘systematics,’ ‘classification,’ ‘identification,’ ‘nomenclature,’ and ‘taxon’ will be helpful. These terms are not particularly problematic and their usage is generally agreed upon by the biologists. These terms generally signify what taxonomists do, such as ‘identification’ and ‘classification’ or the results of such 4 5 work, such as ‘taxon.’ Later I will tackle more problematic terms which refer to the “tools” of taxonomy such as ‘character’
Recommended publications
  • Understanding Cladistics
    Understanding Cladistics Activity for Grades 5–8 Introduction Objective At the American Museum of Natural History, In this activity, students will explore cladistics and scientists use a method called cladistics to group create a cladogram of their own. animals. They look for unique features, such as a hole in the hip socket, that the animals share. Materials Animals with like features are grouped together. A • Understanding Cladistics chart, called a cladogram, shows these relationships. • A penny, nickel, dime, and quarter for each pair Using cladistics, scientists can reconstruct genealogi- of students cal relationships and can show how animals are • 6-8 dinosaurs pictures duplicated for each group, linked to one another through a long and complex downloadable from history of evolutionary changes. amnh.org/resources/rfl/pdf/dino_16_illustrations.pdf Procedure 1. Write lion, elephant, zebra, kangaroo, koala, buffalo, raccoon, and alligator. Ask students how the animals are related and what might be a good way of grouping them into sets and subsets. Discuss students responses. Tyrannosaurus rex Apatosaurus excelsus 2. Explain to students that scientists use a method extinct extinct called cladistics to determine evolutionary relation- ships among animals. They look for features that animals share, such as four limbs, hooves, or a hole in the hip socket. Animals with like features are grouped together. Scientists make a chart called a cladogram to show these relationships. 3. Tell students that they will examine the features of various coins to determine how they are related. Remind students that cladistics is used to determine relationships among organisms, and Theropoda Sauropoda Foot with three main At least 11 or more not necessarily objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Phylogeny and Taxonomy Into a Comprehensive Tree of Life
    Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life Cody E. Hinchliffa,1, Stephen A. Smitha,1,2, James F. Allmanb, J. Gordon Burleighc, Ruchi Chaudharyc, Lyndon M. Coghilld, Keith A. Crandalle, Jiabin Dengc, Bryan T. Drewf, Romina Gazisg, Karl Gudeh, David S. Hibbettg, Laura A. Katzi, H. Dail Laughinghouse IVi, Emily Jane McTavishj, Peter E. Midfordd, Christopher L. Owenc, Richard H. Reed, Jonathan A. Reesk, Douglas E. Soltisc,l, Tiffani Williamsm, and Karen A. Cranstonk,2 aEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; bInterrobang Corporation, Wake Forest, NC 27587; cDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; dField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605; eComputational Biology Institute, George Washington University, Ashburn, VA 20147; fDepartment of Biology, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE 68849; gDepartment of Biology, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610; hSchool of Journalism, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824; iBiological Science, Clark Science Center, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063; jDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045; kNational Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705; lFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; and mComputer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 Edited by David M. Hillis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved July 28, 2015 (received for review December 3, 2014) Reconstructing the phylogenetic relationships that unite all line- published phylogenies are available only as journal figures, rather ages (the tree of life) is a grand challenge. The paucity of homologous than in electronic formats that can be integrated into databases and character data across disparately related lineages currently renders synthesis methods (7–9).
    [Show full text]
  • Riverside Quarterly V2N4 Sapiro 1967-03
    Riverside XZ ‘ RIVERS lue. QUARTERLY March 1967 Vol. u, 4 Editor: Leland Sapiro Associate Editor: Jim Harmon Poetry Editor: Jim Sallis Assistant Editors: Redd Boggs Edward Teach Jon White Send business correspondence and prose manuscripts to: This issue is dedicated to John W. Campbell, Jr., who is Box 82 University Station, Saskatoon, Canada the main subject in two articles. If Orlin Tremaine changed science fiction "from a didactic exercise into a form of art," Send poetry to: R.D. 3, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 then Campbell changed it from romance to novel, i.e., into an art form with social content. I do not prefer the type of story emphasised by Mr. Campbell's present magazine, but this in no way reduces indebtedness to him for any science fiction reader. table of contents "NOW HEAR THIS'." Everyone is urged to register at once for the 1967 science­ RQ Miscellany .................... 231 fiction convention to be held in New York city, September 1—4. Superman and the System ..... A S3 registration fee paid now entitles you to the usual con­ (first of two parts) ........... W.H.G. Armytage .... 232 vention privileges (e.g., reduced room rates) plus progress reports and a program book mailed in advance. Send cash or in­ Consubstantial ............ ....... Padraig 0 Broin .... 243 quiries to Nycon 3, Box 367, Gracie Square Sta., New York 10028. Creide's Lament for Cael ............ 244 Parapsychology: Fact or Fraud? .... Raymond Birge ..... 247 "RADIOHERO" The Bombardier .................... Thomas Disch ....... 265 Old Time Radio fans can anticipate Jim Harmon's book, The Great Radio Heroes, scheduled for publication by Doubleday On Being Forbidden Entrance to a Castle ...
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Plant Taxonomy Bot
    PRINCIPLES OF PLANT TAXONOMY BOT 222 Dr. M. Ajmal Ali, PhD 1 What is Taxonomy / Systematics ? Animal group No. of species Amphibians 6,199 Birds 9,956 Fish 30,000 Mammals 5,416 Tundra Reptiles 8,240 Subtotal 59,811 Grassland Forest Insects 950,000 Molluscs 81,000 Q: Why we keep the stuffs of our home Crustaceans 40,000 at the fixed place or arrange into some Corals 2,175 kinds of system? Desert Others 130,200 Rain forest Total 1,203,375 • Every Human being is a Taxonomist Plants No. of species Mosses 15,000 Ferns and allies 13,025 Gymnosperms 980 Dicotyledons 199,350 Monocotyledons 59,300 Green Algae 3,715 Red Algae 5,956 Lichens 10,000 Mushrooms 16,000 Brown Algae 2,849 Subtotal 28,849 Total 1,589,361 • We have millions of different kind of plants, animals and microorganism. We need to scientifically identify, name and classify all the living organism. • Taxonomy / Systematics is the branch of science deals with classification of organism. 2 • Q. What is Plant Taxonomy / Plant systematics We study plants because: Plants convert Carbon dioxide gas into Every things we eat comes Plants produce oxygen. We breathe sugars through the process of directly or indirectly from oxygen. We cannot live without photosynthesis. plants. oxygen. Many chemicals produced by the Study of plants science helps to Study of plants science helps plants used as learn more about the natural Plants provide fibres for paper or fabric. to conserve endangered medicine. world plants. We have millions of different kind of plants, animals and microorganism.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryan Curtis
    The Library of America • Story of the Week Reprinted from Football: Great Writing about the National Sport (The Library of America, 2014), pages 413–34. Headnote by John Schulian. Originally appeared in Texas Monthly (January 2013). Copyright © 2013. Reprinted by permission of Texas Monthly. Bryan Curtis Bryan Curtis (b. 1977) is predictable only in that there seem to be surprises in everything he writes, good surprises, the kind that let readers know they can count on him for a unique take no matter what the subject. Consider the surge in concern over concussions in football from the NFL on down to the youth leagues. It was the youth leagues that fascinated Curtis, a staff writer at the website Grantland and a native Texan whose byline appears fre- quently in Texas Monthly. He wanted to see “how they were processing the news about football. How they were coming to grips with it. How they were, in some cases, ignoring it.” Curtis found the perfect team to study in Allen, Texas, outside Dallas—undefeated for years, loaded with prize elementary school athletes who would realize only later that they were saying good-bye to childhood. His story about them, “Friday Night Tykes,” appeared in Texas Monthly’s January 2013 issue and provided further evidence that he is one of the new century’s very best sportswriters. Curtis began his journalism career by writing about the real world for the New Republic and Slate, first explored the world of fun and games at the New York Times’ sports magazine Play, and returned to the serious side to help Tina Brown, the mercurial former Vanity Fair and New Yorker editor, launch The Daily Beast.
    [Show full text]
  • The K-Pop Wave: an Economic Analysis
    The K-pop Wave: An Economic Analysis Patrick A. Messerlin1 Wonkyu Shin2 (new revision October 6, 2013) ABSTRACT This paper first shows the key role of the Korean entertainment firms in the K-pop wave: they have found the right niche in which to operate— the ‘dance-intensive’ segment—and worked out a very innovative mix of old and new technologies for developing the Korean comparative advantages in this segment. Secondly, the paper focuses on the most significant features of the Korean market which have contributed to the K-pop success in the world: the relative smallness of this market, its high level of competition, its lower prices than in any other large developed country, and its innovative ways to cope with intellectual property rights issues. Thirdly, the paper discusses the many ways the K-pop wave could ensure its sustainability, in particular by developing and channeling the huge pool of skills and resources of the current K- pop stars to new entertainment and art activities. Last but not least, the paper addresses the key issue of the ‘Koreanness’ of the K-pop wave: does K-pop send some deep messages from and about Korea to the world? It argues that it does. Keywords: Entertainment; Comparative advantages; Services; Trade in services; Internet; Digital music; Technologies; Intellectual Property Rights; Culture; Koreanness. JEL classification: L82, O33, O34, Z1 Acknowledgements: We thank Dukgeun Ahn, Jinwoo Choi, Keun Lee, Walter G. Park and the participants to the seminars at the Graduate School of International Studies of Seoul National University, Hanyang University and STEPI (Science and Technology Policy Institute).
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomy of Human Evolved Psychological Adaptations
    Evo Edu Outreach (2012) 5:312–320 DOI 10.1007/s12052-012-0428-8 EVOLUTION AND EDUCATION RESOURCES PsychTable.org: The Taxonomy of Human Evolved Psychological Adaptations Niruban Balachandran & Daniel J. Glass Published online: 8 July 2012 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 Abstract We announce the launch of PsychTable.org,a Introduction collaborative web-based project devoted to classifying and evaluating evolved psychological adaptations The timing is right to establish a classification system for (EPAs), geared toward researchers, educators, students, human evolved psychological adaptations (EPAs). Several and the general public. The website works by aggregat- factors have coalesced to create a unique opportunity to de- ing citations which support or challenge the existence of velop a taxonomy that will facilitate the expansion of a culture each purported EPA, using a mathematical algorithm to of both synthesis and empirical rigor in the evolutionary assign an evidentiary strength score to each, and gener- behavioral sciences, including disciplines such as evolution- ating a table which represents the current but ever- ary cognitive neuroscience, behavioral ecology, “evo-devo,” changing state of the empirical evidence. Citations are primatology, evolutionary anthropology, human ethology, ge- added and assigned evaluative ratings by both general netics, and others. users and an international community of expert contrib- These aforementioned factors include: a large international utors; as such, the content of the site will represent the body of research describing hundreds of amassed EPAs; a consensus of the scientific community and new research global research community of evolutionary behavioral scien- opportunities. PsychTable has features for achieving empir- tists that recognizes the importance of both synthesis and ical meta-goals such as quality control, hypothesis testing, classification; the ascent of evolutionary psychology as a cross-disciplinary collaboration, and didactic utility.
    [Show full text]
  • Character Analysis in Cladistics: Abstraction, Reification, and the Search for Objectivity
    Acta Biotheor (2009) 57:129–162 DOI 10.1007/s10441-008-9064-7 REGULAR ARTICLE Character Analysis in Cladistics: Abstraction, Reification, and the Search for Objectivity Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther Received: 10 October 2008 / Accepted: 17 October 2008 / Published online: 7 January 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract The dangers of character reification for cladistic inference are explored. The identification and analysis of characters always involves theory-laden abstraction—there is no theory-free ‘‘view from nowhere.’’ Given theory-ladenness, and given a real world with actual objects and processes, how can we separate robustly real biological characters from uncritically reified characters? One way to avoid reification is through the employment of objectivity criteria that give us good methods for identifying robust primary homology statements. I identify six such criteria and explore each with examples. Ultimately, it is important to minimize character reification, because poor character analysis leads to dismal cladograms, even when proper phylogenetic analysis is employed. Given the deep and systemic problems associated with character reification, it is ironic that philosophers have focused almost entirely on phylogenetic analysis and neglected character analysis. Keywords Characters Á Cladistics Á Phylogenetics Á Morphology Á Abstraction Á Reification Á Biological theory Á Epistemology Á Causation How are we to recognize the ‘‘true’’ characters of organisms rather than imposing upon them arbitrary divisions that obscure the very processes that we seek to understand? …No issue is of greater importance in the study of biology. –Lewontin 2001, p. xvii Are characters natural units or artifacts of observation and description? In both systematics and ecology, there is often a considerable gulf between observables and the units that play causal roles in our models.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Impact Assessment in the Context of EIA
    RADAR Research Archive and Digital Asset Repository An evaluation of ecological impact assessment in England Katherine Drayson (2012) https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/0d813ad8-3f82-48f2-a25d-f04f78444cca/1/ Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, the full bibliographic details must be given as follows: Drayson, K (2012) An evaluation of ecological impact assessment in England PhD, Oxford Brookes University Removed pp. 258-end: published papers WWW.BROOKES.AC.UK/GO/RADAR AN EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN ENGLAND Katherine Drayson A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the award of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Oxford Brookes University DECEMBER 2012 ABSTRACT Ecological impact assessment (EcIA) has historically been poorly performed, resulting in poor quality EcIA chapters. No research has been conducted to identify whether poor quality EcIA chapters result in poor quality mitigation and therefore potential net loss of biodiversity. A review of 112 EcIA chapters was conducted to determine whether there have been improvements since the last review in 2000 and which factors are linked with EcIA chapter quality, such as the introduction of professional guidance in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on S-4 Starts Storm of Protests Saves Woman
    ’.^“.•'V'^ •*4n '-p £ ' HM'"*" _ C,--V ■, , ’ ',V >X5',V' PBBSH BUX fSieiihst hr V. 8. <WejaSer Bhrem, AVBRAGB DAltiY CIHCVLATIOX Mew Have* ; for the month of January, 1€ J8 'Increasing cloudineea and warm* er, followed by rain late ton i^ t 5 , 0 8 7 and Tlinradaf; ^ ateMher -of tke Aadlt Baroaa of !t.-« ' CIrcalatlooa State Library •'^- (FOUiSiM«-. -1 AGES) PRICE THREE CENTS MANCHEStER; CONN., WEDNESDAY,- FEBRUARY 22, 1928. VO L. XUl„ NO. 122. Classified Advertising on Page 12. CATFISH GROWS IN REPORT ON S-4 COAST BEAN PATCH. West Palm Beach, Fla., Feb. 22.— Farmer Jake Gray swears STARTS STORM to this fish story from the Everglades. He was plowing his Bean patch, he says, when he turned OF PROTESTS up a live catfish. If true, there is no telling what might have happened if the fish had remained in the Multi-Millionaire Oil M apaU Congressmen, Admirals and soil and become crossed with a snap Bean. The glades might With H. Mason Day and have reproduced a stew that Treasury Officials Indig­ would Be the envy of the now infamous army “ slumgullion.’ Celebrates The Day William J. Bnms Heat nant Over Results of Conrt’s Verdict on Con­ Alexandria, Va FeB, 22— Liter-<s»Alexandria had a Birthday fete for Naval ProBe. ^Washington which he attended per­ ally buried beneath flags and bunt­ SAVES WOMAN sonally. The 'date, however, was tempt Charges— Day Gets ing, .and inordinately proud of Its FeBruary 11, that Being the date Washington, FeB. 22.— Stormr. or distinction, this plaOT -Jittle .^Afir. upon which he actually was Born, Fonr Months and Noted protest ana indignation gathered FROMSHARKS ginla town led the uhtiq^.
    [Show full text]
  • Crown Clades in Vertebrate Nomenclature
    2008 POINTS OF VIEW 173 Wiens, J. J. 2001. Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: Wilkins, A. S. 2002. The evolution of developmental pathways. Sinauer Problems and solutions. Syst. Biol. 50:689–699. Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Wiens, J. J., and R. E. Etheridge. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of Wright, S. 1934a. An analysis of variability in the number of digits in hoplocercid lizards: Coding and combining meristic, morphometric, an inbred strain of guinea pigs. Genetics 19:506–536. and polymorphic data using step matrices. Herpetologica 59:375– Wright, S. 1934b. The results of crosses between inbred strains 398. of guinea pigs differing in number of digits. Genetics 19:537– Wiens, J. J., and M. R. Servedio. 1997. Accuracy of phylogenetic analysis 551. including and excluding polymorphic characters. Syst. Biol. 46:332– 345. Wiens, J. J., and M. R. Servedio. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis and in- First submitted 28 June 2007; reviews returned 10 September 2007; traspecific variation: Performance of parsimony, likelihood, and dis- final acceptance 18 October 2007 tance methods. Syst. Biol. 47:228–253. Associate Editor: Norman MacLeod Syst. Biol. 57(1):173–181, 2008 Copyright c Society of Systematic Biologists ISSN: 1063-5157 print / 1076-836X online DOI: 10.1080/10635150801910469 Crown Clades in Vertebrate Nomenclature: Correcting the Definition of Crocodylia JEREMY E. MARTIN1 AND MICHAEL J. BENTON2 1UniversiteL´ yon 1, UMR 5125 PEPS CNRS, 2, rue Dubois 69622 Villeurbanne, France; E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS9 1RJ, UK; E-mail: [email protected] Downloaded By: [Martin, Jeremy E.] At: 19:32 25 February 2008 Acrown group is defined as the most recent common Dyke, 2002; Forey, 2002; Monsch, 2005; Rieppel, 2006) ancestor of at least two extant groups and all its descen- but rather expresses dissatisfaction with the increasingly dants (Gauthier, 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Demonizing Unions: Religious Rhetoric in the Early 20Th
    DEMONIZING UNIONS: RELIGIOUS RHETORIC IN THE EARLY 20TH CENTURY AMERICAN STRIKE NOVEL A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by David Michael Cosca August 2019 © David Michael Cosca DEMONIZING UNIONS: RELIGIOUS RHETORIC IN THE EARLY 20TH CENTURY AMERICAN STRIKE NOVEL David Michael Cosca, Ph. D. Cornell University 2019 Demonizing Unions uncovers the significance of a Biblical idiom in American novels portraying violent labor conflicts from the 1910s to the 1930s. I reveal the different ways that Upton Sinclair’s King Coal and The Coal War, Mary Heaton Vorse’s Strike!, and Ruth McKenney’s Industrial Valley employ a Biblical motif both to emphasize the God-like power of Capital over society, and to critique an emergent socio-political faith in business power. The texts I examine demonstrate how it was clear to industrialists in the early 20th century that physical violence was losing its efficacy. Therefore, much of the brunt of the physical conflict in labor struggles could be eased by waging a war of ideas to turn public opinion into an additional, ultimately more powerful, weapon against the potential of organized labor. I argue that in these texts, the besmearing of the discontented workers as violent dupes of “outside agitators,” rather than regular folks with economic grievances, takes on Biblical proportions. In turn, these authors utilize Biblical stories oriented around conceptions of power and hierarchy to illuminate the potential of ordinary humans to effect their own liberation. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH David Cosca grew up in Santa Maria, CA.
    [Show full text]