<<

ReVIEW Article ▼

Memory, brain and aging: The good, the bad and the promising

by Beth A. Ober

A large body of evidence converges on the conclusion that episodic mem- ory (the recollection of personally experienced events) is the only long- Caspel van iStockphoto/Wouter term system that shows significant age-related deficits. More- over, the brain regions most likely to show age-related volume loss are those most critically involved in epi- sodic memory. Older adult brains may have much greater plasticity (capacity to change) than once believed; for example, neurogenesis (the birth of new ), increases in cognitive (including memory) performance, and High levels of mental activity, such as playing games like bridge, are predictive of improved cognitive and brain outcomes in older adulthood. increases in regional brain volume have all been shown to occur in older Skills that we have acquired over our Myth: “Alzheimer’s disease is inevita- adulthood, as a result of physical or lifetimes, most of which can be exe- ble in .” In fact, Alzheimer’s dis- cuted in a fairly automatic manner (e.g., ease, which accounts for about 50% of mental activity/training. The next typing, driving, reading, swimming, all cases, occurs in 0.9%, 4.2% wave of research will enhance our knitting, playing a musical instrument) and 14.7%, of those 65, 75 and 85 years understanding of brain plasticity in also depend on memory. of age, respectively (Brookmeyer et al. adulthood and enable specific guide- Adults over 65 years old comprise 2007). Although the risk of Alzheimer’s 11.2% (4.1 million) of Californians. disease and other increases lines for lifestyle or pharmacological Due in part to aging baby boomers, with age, a minority of older adults are treatments that optimize brain and California’s elderly population is ex- affected. memory functioning well into late pected to grow twice as fast as the total Myth: “When memory problems oc- adulthood. population to more than 8 million by cur in normal aging, they involve all 2020 (US Census Bureau 2010). Changes aspects of memory.” Only one type of in memory function, or even the per- long-term memory, known as episodic hen middle-aged or elderly ception and interpretation of such or event memory, undergoes significant Wadults discuss their health and changes by oneself or by others, can decline in normal aging; other types well-being, one of the most commonly affect day-to-day functioning and well- of long-term memory either remain expressed worries is memory problems, being in a variety of contexts, including unaffected or show improvement. including the fear of Alzheimer’s dis- family, community and workplace. Each (“Normal aging” indicates the absence ease. This is not surprising, given that and every one of our actions, interac- of dementia or other brain disease, and memory functions are at the core of our tions, musings, decisions and plans the ability to live independently.) This day-to-day intellectual and social activi- critically depend on memory. misunderstanding reflects the lack of ties. Memory enables us to know who awareness of scientific evidence for Memory myths vs. reality we are, as well as what our goals, values several separable types of long-term and beliefs are. Memory allows us to A number of myths persist about memory function, each with separable think about recent and remote events memory and aging. brain underpinnings. in our lives, and to plan for the future. Myth: “Memory abilities will decline Major types of long-term memory Moreover, memory enables us to accu- in older adulthood to a degree that will mulate and make use of vast reservoirs significantly affect day-to-day function- Cognitive scientists define short-term of information about people, objects, ing.” Rather, about 85% of adults age 65 memory as that which is available in places, social customs, language and and older do not show significant de- consciousness (e.g., the sentence that individual domains of expertise (e.g., clines in memory ability and are able to was just spoken, the phone number just birds, wine, astronomy, neuroscience). live independently. dialed), whereas long-term memory

174 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE • VOLUME 64, NUMBER 4 encompasses any that are still available after a brief period (30 to 60 seconds) of distraction or disen- gagement. Information in short-term memory will only be encoded into long-term memory and be available for retrieval after a delay if one is mo- tivated or interested in remembering it. Otherwise, it will quickly be forgot- ten. When information in short-term memory is manipulated in some way, for example in order to make linkages with information in long-term , or in the service of computations, this type of memory is referred to as work- Fig. 1. Increasingly complete versions of a given object are shown until the object is identified. ing memory. Source: Snodgrass et al. 1987; reproduced by permission from Life Science Associates. There is general agreement among and neuroscience the party exemplify the sensory-motor scholars on the broad outlines of the type of . 1.5 behavioral and brain aspects for the Rey Episodic and recognition 1 Benton following three major types of long- term memory (Schacter and Tulving Laboratory tests of 0.5 Cued recall 1994; Schacter et al. 2000; Squire and generally involve a study phase for a set Knowlton 2000). of to-be-remembered words (or pictures 0

Episodic. Episodic memory involves or sentences), followed by a test phase Z scores the conscious recollection of episodes in which participants are asked to either −0.5 or events, along with a personal context. recall or recognize the items that they Recalling a dinner party attended last recently studied. Recall tests can be −1 week, including where the event took either “free” (e.g., “Tell me everything −1.5 place, who was there, what you ate and you remember from the list”) or cued 20–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–69 70–79 80–89 what the conversations were about, ex- (e.g., “Tell me all animals that you can Age groups (years) emplifies episodic memory. remember from the list”). Age-related Semantic. involves declines in episodic recall are well Fig. 2. Adult life span (cross-sectional) “world knowledge” in the broadest documented (fig. 2). Recognition tests performance on four episodic memory tasks. sense: languages, objects, places, spatial typically require a “yes” versus “no” “Benton” and “Rey” data are from clinical, pictorial, word-list tests named after relationships, social norms, facts/trivia, response as to whether an item was in the authors; “cued recall” and “free recall” data and all sorts of concepts from domains the previously studied list. Older adults are from laboratory, word-list learning tasks in which one may or may not be an show little or no deficit in memory per- created by the source author. Plotted Z scores expert. The knowledge brought to the formance for recognition, in contrast are referenced to the entire age range, with an overall mean of zero; younger adults are dinner party about the names, back- to significant deficits for recall (fig. 3). above and older adults are below zero. Source: grounds and interests of the guests is This reduction has been attributed to Park et al. 2002; © 2002 American Psychological part of semantic memory. environmental support, which reduces Association. Procedural. Unlike both episodic the effort needed for retrieval processes. and semantic memory, procedural The dissociation between recall and 25 memory is not easily accessible to con- recognition is why we often fail to recall 20 scious awareness or verbal description the name of a movie we saw or a person Recognition and evaluation. Procedural memory we met several days ago, whereas we 15 Recall includes: (1) sensory-motor skills such can easily recognize the name as correct as typing, bicycle riding and piano when it is presented to us either alone 10 playing; (2) learning and memory for or as one of several options. The older 5 procedures, sequences and rules to we are, the more often we have failures Mean number correct solve tasks and puzzles; and (3) repeti- of recall. However, when recognition 0 tion , an increase in speed and/ is successful for a name that cannot be 20–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–75 or accuracy when identifying a word recalled, this shows that the name is at Age group (years) or picture on repeated presentation as least partially available in memory but compared to its initial presentation, not readily accessible. Fig. 3. Adult life span (cross-sectional) even when the item is degraded and the The differential susceptibility performance for free recall compared to recognition on a word-list learning, episodic presentations are separated by many of recognition versus recall perfor- memory task. Data source: Schonfield and days (fig. 1). Driving skills used to get to mance in normal aging is consistent Robertson 1966.

http://californiaagriculture.ucanr.org • OCTOBER–DECEMBER 2010 175 As we progress through middle and older age we acquire larger vocabularies and more extensive knowledge about the world around us. Shutterstock/camilla$$ with dual-process models of episodic that recollection is more negatively af- memory — recollection and familiarity fected than familiarity, just as recall is (Light et al. 2000). Recollection is a rela- more negatively affected than recogni- tively slow and deliberate process that tion, in aging. These two components of involves memory access for the desired episodic memory may reflect neuroana- item/episode in tandem with informa- tomically distinct memory processes, tion concerning the context in which with recollection being more dependent it was experienced, such as when or on the brain’s , and fa- where the episode occurred, the emo- miliarity being more dependent on the tions experienced at the time, and so on. nearby . Familiarity, in contrast, is a relatively Semantic memory improves with age automatic process that provides a quick indication of the strength of the mem- In contrast to the steady declines in ory for the item/episode, without any episodic memory across all decades link to the context in which it was expe- of adulthood, semantic memory is rienced. For example, when you realize not only preserved, but also shows While episodic memory (the ability to that you know the woman in front of improvement until around the eighth remember things that happened) declines with you in a store’s checkout line but cannot decade of life, after which a gradual age, semantic memory (one’s store of general recall her name or where or when you decline can be observed. Vocabulary knowledge) continually increases until about met her, you are exhibiting successful and general knowledge tests are most the eighth decade of life. familiarity-based memory, along with commonly used to evaluate semantic a frustrating lack of recollection-based memory (fig. 4). There is evidence that the word’s meaning. Sometimes, when memory. For both everyday and labora- as we progress through middle and we are not trying to retrieve the word, it tory memory tasks, recollection plays a older age we acquire larger vocabu- simply “pops” into consciousness. TOTs larger role in recall, whereas familiar- laries and more extensive knowledge have been studied with naturalistic di- ity plays a larger role in recognition. about the world around us, which is ary studies as well as controlled labora- Moreover, numerous studies indicate certainly good news regarding memory tory methods (Burke et al. 1991; Heine and aging. Increased world knowl- et al. 1999). Findings indicate greater edge presumably can compensate to numbers of TOTs and longer resolution 1.5 Vocabulary some extent for decreased facility in times for older compared to younger Shipley episodic memory. For example, linking 1 adulthood; however, without time pres- Synonym to-be-remembered items and events in sure, older adults are as successful as Antonym 0.5 a meaningful way with information younger adults in retrieving desired stored in semantic memory increases words. According to the widely favored

0 the likelihood of successful memory incomplete activation (transmission def- retrieval for these items; this type of icit) hypothesis (Burke et al. 1991), TOTs Z scores −0.5 semantic strategy benefits occur when there is not enough activa- older as well as younger adults (Froger tion from the semantic (meaning-based)

−1 et al. 2009). knowledge about a desired word to Although our vocabulary knowledge lexical (word-based) and/or phonologi-

−1.5 is relatively protected from age-related cal (sound-based) knowledge, preclud- 20–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–69 70–79 80–89 loss, the ease with which we retrieve ing the ability to retrieve the complete Age group (years) words is not. We are all familiar with phonology for the desired word. This the “tip-of-the-tongue” (TOT) phenom- incomplete activation from semantics Fig. 4. Adult life span (cross-sectional) enon in our everyday lives. It begins to phonology is more likely to happen performance on three semantic memory when we are attempting to come up for words and names encountered in- tasks. “Shipley” data are from a standardized, with a word, generally a noun and frequently or not encountered recently, clinical vocabulary test, whereas “synonym” and “antonym” data are from laboratory- sometimes a proper name, that we and for older as compared to younger based vocabulary tests. Plotted Z scores are want to use in conversation. We fail to adults. As frustrating as word-finding referenced to the entire age range, with overall retrieve the desired word or name, and difficulties can be, the good news is that mean of zero. Performance improves until about age 70, followed by minimal decline. yet we are sure that we know the word, they are due to the slowing of access Source: Park et al. 2002; © 2002 American and sometimes can think of the first and retrieval, rather than the loss of Psychological Association. letter, the last syllable or some aspect of knowledge.

176 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE • VOLUME 64, NUMBER 4 Alternate methods of assessing se- that are more perceptual, such as pic- regions playing key roles in particu- mantic memory do not require word ture or word identification (e.g., from lar types of memory (figs. 5A and 5B). retrieval and therefore are not affected an incomplete picture; fig. 1), older and The episodic memory system depends by aging-related word-retrieval difficul- younger adults show equivalent in- critically on the medial temporal lobes ties. These are referred to as implicit creases in speed and accuracy in iden- (including the hippocampus and adja- methods because the person being tifying previously experienced pictures cent entorhinal and parahippocampal tested need not be consciously aware of or words as compared to new ones. regions). Evidence for the hippocam- the nature of the semantic knowledge pus’s critical role in episodic memory Brain and memory being evaluated. A research method has come from neuroimaging studies called “semantic priming” capitalizes Multiple regions of the brain are of patients (e.g., post-stroke) on the fact that we are faster to process involved in memory, with particular showing damage to the hippocampus, an item that follows an associated, semantically related item versus an unrelated item. For example, the word “truck” is processed more quickly when (A) it follows “car” than when it follows Prefrontal “lion”; in this case the related words cortex Thalamocingulate share features common to vehicles. The tract Cingulate gyrus task required of the participants is most commonly a “word” versus “nonword” button press for each of a large number Anterior thalamic nucleus of letter strings (e.g., peach, salfay, car, Fornix truck). The timing of word presentation Thalamus and recording of response times are Mammillothalamic tract computer controlled. The participant’s Mamillary body is focused on the required response, rather than possible linkages Amygdala between adjacent words, especially if Parahippocampal Hippocampus cortex the number of semantic linkages within Perirhinal Entorhinal the list is low. A reduction in response cortex cortex time, when associative and semantic linkages are present versus absent, comprises the semantic priming effect. With semantic priming tasks, the pres- ervation of a wide variety of semantic (B) Supplementary knowledge about objects and their re- motor area lationships has been demonstrated, not Basal ganglia only for healthy elderly adults but also (putamen) for patients with Alzheimer’s disease (Ober 2002; Ober et al. 1991). Procedural memory preserved Inferolateral Procedural memory seems to be temporal lobe quite well preserved in normal aging. For sensory-motor tasks such as knit- Primary visual ting or bicycle riding, although memory Memory Cerebellum cortex for sequential components is preserved Semantic these tasks may be performed more Procedural slowly and/or awkwardly due to mo- Working tor performance issues associated with aging (e.g., arthritis, muscle weak- ness). For tasks that involve learning Fig. 5. (A) Areas of the brain significantly involved in episodic memory, shown from a midline and memory for sequences or rules, view of the brain. The medial temporal lobes, including the hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex, are critical for normal episodic memory functioning, as are other brain regions highlighted but little or no motor skill, there is in blue. (B) Areas of the brain significantly involved in semantic, procedural and working strong evidence for age-equivalent memory as shown from a lateral (external) view of the brain. Temporal lobe areas involved in rates of learning and memory reten- semantic memory are different from those involved in episodic memory. Brain regions involved in procedural memory do not overlap with those involved in either episodic or semantic memory. tion. Examples include card games such The prefrontal cortex is involved in and, in turn, encoding information into, and as bridge or solving Sudoko puzzles. retrieving information from, long-term episodic and semantic memory. Source: Budson and Price Finally, for procedural-memory tasks 2005; © 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.

http://californiaagriculture.ucanr.org • OCTOBER–DECEMBER 2010 177 as well as dementia patients with prominent episodic memory deficits (Alzheimer’s disease). Even damage to a very small sec- iStockphoto/Sean Warren iStockphoto/Sean tion of the hippocampus (such as can occur after CO2 poisoning or cardiac arrest) can result in significant episodic memory problems (Hopkins et al. 1995; Zola-Morgan et al. 1986). The hippo- campus is part of the limbic system, and when a lesion occurs in particular lim- bic structures (e.g., mammillary body, fornix, anterior thalamic nucleus; fig. 5A) episodic memory dysfunction may occur. The prefrontal cortex (the large, anterior portion of the frontal lobes) is another important brain area for epi- sodic memory; the hippocampal region needs to “work with” the frontal lobes (involving working memory processes). The hippocampal-frontal collaboration Certain parts of the brain show volume reductions with age, especially the prefrontal cortex and enables effective episodic encoding and hippocampus. Both are important to the functioning of episodic memory, which plays a critical retrieval, particularly for source (e.g., role in remembering past events. location, person, place) and time-related Structural brain changes aspects of to-be-remembered events. cortex is in keeping with evidence for The semantic memory system is Based on autopsy data and low- greater dependence of recollection as- not dependent on the hippocampus or resolution (in vivo) CT scans, the gross pects of episodic memory (impaired related structures, and world knowl- structural brain changes associated in aging) on the hippocampus, versus edge acquired prior to brain injury or with normal aging include: overall greater dependence of familiarity as- disease is generally intact in amnesics. shrinkage of the cortex (brain atrophy pects of episodic memory (relatively There is ample evidence that the vi- due to tissue/cell loss), enlargement of preserved in aging) on the entorhinal sual features of objects are stored in the cerebral ventricles (structures in the cortex; however, the entorhinal cortex the visual processing centers of the center of the brain filled with cerebral does show volume loss among 70-plus- brain, auditory features are stored in spinal fluid), and increasing size of year-olds. When the integrity of white the auditory processing centers of the the cortical sulci (convolutions of the matter tracks (bundles of axons, which brain, and so on, such that the complete cerebral cortex that form “hills” [gyri] are parts of nerve cells that transmit knowledge representations of objects and “valleys” [sulci]). High-resolution electrical signals to other neurons) is are distributed throughout the cortical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has specifically evaluated, either via MRI or regions involved in object perception. enabled increasingly precise quantifica- diffusion tensor imaging (a high- Additionally, specific regions of the left tion of not only general brain changes, resolution imaging tool specifically tar- prefrontal cortex and bilateral anterior but also age-related volume changes for geted to white matter), the greatest defi- temporal cortex seem to be involved particular brain regions and structures. ciencies for older compared to younger in retrieving, maintaining and select- Raz et al. (2005) summarized struc- adults are in the frontal lobes rather ing semantic information (Badre and tural brain changes in normal aging. than the more posterior lobes (Head et Wagner 2002; Oliver and Thompson- This cross-sectional study of adults al. 2004; Wen and Sachdev 2004). Schill 2003). ranging from about 20 to 80 years old To summarize, the structural brain Procedural memory, like seman- also had a longitudinal component in changes associated with normal ag- tic memory, is not dependent on the that subjects were measured initially ing consist of declining brain tissue hippocampus or related structures; and after five years. For brain-volume volume, with the prefrontal cortex and indeed, amnesic patients do not show changes both within individuals and hippocampus particularly affected. The impairments in the various types of across individuals of different ages, hippocampus plays an essential role in procedural learning and memory tasks the hippocampus and subregions of episodic memory functioning, and also described earlier. The brain areas in- the prefrontal cortex showed sizable must “work with” the prefrontal cor- volved (e.g., motor cortex, visual cortex, reductions with age, whereas the ento- tex in order for episodic encoding and prefrontal cortex and cerebellum; fig. rhinal cortex and primary visual cortex retrieval to work effectively. Moreover, 5B) are varied, and depend on the par- showed minimal or no such reductions among the three types of long-term ticular type of procedural learning and (fig. 5). The differential loss of volume memory, only episodic memory is nega- memory task. for hippocampal versus entorhinal tively affected in normal aging.

178 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE • VOLUME 64, NUMBER 4 Brain function and plasticity neurogenesis has been reliably demon- index by Thomson Reuters). As the strated are the hippocampus, olfactory older adult population continues grow- Although there is ample evidence for bulb (where primary odor processing ing at the state, national and global decreases in tissue volume during the occurs) and caudate nucleus (near the levels, there is increasing interest in course of normal aging, three important center of the brain and involved in feed- interventions to minimize brain atro- facts greatly mitigate this bad news. back-related aspects of learning and phy, maximize brain functioning, and Atrophy. First, older adults are quite memory). Hippocampal neurogenesis is maintain adequate memory and other heterogeneous and some will have especially good news, given the critical cognitive functions throughout later minimal brain-tissue loss over time. role of the hippocampus in laying down adulthood. The extent that memory The degree of brain atrophy in normal new episodic memories, and given that and other cognitive functions can be aging may have been overestimated the hippocampus is one of the most vul- maintained, or at least minimally im- in previous research, because sub- nerable brain areas in terms of cell loss paired, will have positive effects on jects with preclinical dementia were associated with normal aging (and to a day-to-day functioning and life satisfac- not excluded due to lack of long-term much greater extent, with Alzheimer’s tion for older adults, as well as reduce follow-up evaluation. Burgmans et al. disease). caregiving costs and extend the years of (2009) began a longitudinal study with Bilaterality. Third, brain function independent living (i.e., fewer years in a cognitively healthy adults (52 to 82 and the cognitive functions dependent nursing home). years old), and after three years an MRI upon it may not be in “lock-step” with Physical activity. There is increasing brain scan accompanied cognitive test- decreases in brain tissue volume, due support for the hypothesis that ing. The subgroup of participants who to age-related changes in the patterns as well as general physical fitness can had shown cognitive decline over the of brain activation that are associated improve cognitive (including memory) past three years exhibited a significant with particular types of cognitive and brain function across the adult age-related decrease in brain tissue vol- tasks. One such age-related change is life span. Initial evidence was based ume (for parahippocampal, cingulate the increased bilaterality (activation in mainly on observational studies. One gyrus and prefrontal cortex), but the both hemispheres) of prefrontal activa- particularly impressive correlational subgroup who remained cognitively tions in older as compared to younger study (Erickson et al. 2009) showed that stable showed no age-related decreases. adults (Park and Reuter-Lorenz 2009). higher cardiovascular fitness signifi- This promising finding will hopefully In younger adults, tasks cantly predicted greater MRI-measured be replicated and extended. result in focal activations in the left pre- hippocampal volume, as well as perfor- Plasticity. Second, brain plasticity, frontal cortex, whereas visual/spatial mance on an episodic memory task, in a which enables changes in brain struc- memory tasks result in right prefrontal large sample of 59- to 81-year-olds, even ture and function due to experience and activations. This strong laterality is not after controlling for age, sex and years learning, occurs even in older adults. seen in older adults; instead, activation of education. The brains of older as well as younger in the “appropriate” side of the brain is In recent years, a number of exer- animals (rats and nonhuman primates) reduced, while activation in the “inap- cise intervention studies have enabled show increases in the number of neural propriate” side is increased. Increased the evaluation of causal links between synapses (by which neurons commu- bilaterality has been widely observed exercise and cognition. These studies nicate with one another), neurotrans- and it seems to be compensatory, en- mitter activity, number of glial cells abling improved performance: older 0.8 (which support neuronal functions) adults who engage both the left and 0.7 Control and capillary vascularization (blood right prefrontal cortex on memory tasks Exercise 0.6 supply for neurons and glial cells) as a have higher performance than those 0.5 function of “enriched environments” or who don’t show bilateral activation (the 0.4 specific learning experiences (Kramer improved performance is closer, but not et al. 2004; Markham and Greenough equal to, that seen for younger adults). 0.3 Effect size (g) Effect 2004). Using methodologies appropri- 0.2 Maintaining brain function ate to human subjects (functional MRI), 0.1 The question of how to maintain 0 researchers have demonstrated long- Executive Controlled Spatial Speed lasting changes in regional brain activa- brain function into older age has cap- Task type tion patterns as a result of “targeted” tured the attention of many thousands behavioral training. of biological and behavioral scientists Fig. 6. Effect sizes of mean differences in The most exciting research on brain nationally and internationally, who are cognitive-task performance between older plasticity, however, provides evidence obtaining large amounts of research adults in an aerobic fitness program and those who were not (control). Executive = planning for neurogenesis (the “birth” of new funding from government sources, in- and scheduling of mental processes; controlled neurons), not only in adult nonhu- dustry and private foundations. In fact, = inhibiting one response in order to “deliver” man animals, but in older, as well as UC scientists authored 1,885 articles on the desired response; spatial = remembering younger, adult human brains, as a func- human brain aging and/or cognitive visuospatial information; and speed = low-level reaction time. Source: Colcombe and Kramer tion of new learning (Kempermann aging from 2000 to 2009, per the Web 2003; © 2003 Assoc. Psychological Science. 2006). The brain areas where of Science (an online academic citation Reproduced by permission of SAGE Pubs.

http://californiaagriculture.ucanr.org • OCTOBER–DECEMBER 2010 179 activity at baseline with overall cogni- tive function, including a reduced risk of Alzheimer’s disease, at follow-up evaluations spanning five or more years. For example, Wilson et al. (2007) iStockphoto/Tomaz Levstek iStockphoto/Tomaz found that a low mental activity group was 2.5 times more likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease than a high mental activity group over 5 years. Another example is a report by Valenzuela et al. (2008) that older adults’ scores on a life- time mental activity questionnaire were significantly predictive of MRI-assessed hippocampal atrophy over the follow- ing 3 years; that is, there is less atrophy with higher mental activity scores. Although encouraging, the correlational nature of these findings does not per- mit us to conclude that mental activity A recent study showed that higher cardiovascular fitness among 59- to 81-year-olds was causes improved cognitive or brain out- correlated with greater volume in the brain’s hippocampus and better performance in an episodic come. It could be that more mentally ac- memory task. tive adults have healthier brains and/or have been more mentally active in the involve the random assignment of par- control participants; episodic memory years prior to the start of the study than ticipants to an exercise or control (no ex- tasks were part of the “visuospatial” the less mentally active adults. ercise) group. Both before the start and task domain. Additional findings in- Increasing numbers of studies di- at the end of treatment, various aspects cluded: a larger effect of exercise train- rectly manipulate cognitive activity via of cognitive functioning are assessed. ing when the program duration was training sessions designed to improve Most, but not all, individual studies greater than 6 months, as opposed to 1 episodic memory and other cognitive have shown that exercise benefits cogni- to 3 or 4 to 6 months; a much larger ef- functions (Hertzog et al. 2009). There is tion. Fortunately, several meta-analyses fect for training sessions that were more ample evidence for the ability of older have been carried out, which involve than 30 minutes, as opposed to 15 to 30 adults to show improvement on epi- the calculation of exercise (vs. control) minutes long; a somewhat larger effect sodic memory tasks (as well as many effects for many individual studies for training that combined cardiovas- other cognitive tasks) with practice (meeting predetermined criteria) and cular and strength training, as opposed or training, especially when training then obtaining overall effect sizes for to cardiovascular training alone; and in the use of strategies is involved. cognitive measures shared across stud- finally, much larger training effects for Evidence is limited and at times con- the older age groups (66 to 70, or 71 to flicting regarding how long-lasting 80 years) as compared to the younger the effects of training are, the degree The “use it or lose it” age group (55 to 65 years). to which it can be generalized to non- hypothesis is that increasing “Use it or lose it.” The “use it or trained but similar tasks, and whether amounts of mental activity lose it” hypothesis is that increasing the training is actually resulting in a amounts of mental activity enable reduction of age-related deficits on the enable higher levels of higher levels of cognitive functioning trained task (as opposed to benefitting cognitive functioning in middle in middle and late adulthood; in other older and younger adults equally, thus words, mental activity can counter- maintaining the same degree of age- and late adulthood. act the effects of normal aging. Early related deficits). research on mental activity was dom- Among the “gold standard” type ies. The upshot is that exercise posi- inated by correlational, observation- of cognitive intervention, the most tively affects cognitive functioning in based studies. These studies involve ambitious is the ACTIVE (Advanced adults 55 and older, even those with the collection of self-report data from Cognitive Training for Independent and early dementia (Kramer and Erickson large numbers of older adults regard- Vital Elderly) project, a multisite study 2007). ing their engagement in activities pre- in which 2,802 adults over 65 years of Overall effect sizes in these meta- sumed to be mentally stimulating (e.g., age were randomly assigned to a no- analyses tend to be around 0.5, which is reading books, playing bridge, solving training (control) group or one of three moderately robust, as in Colcombe and crossword puzzles), with follow-up cognitive training groups, with training Kramer (2003) (fig. 6). For each of four over varying periods of time to assess taking place over 10 twice-per-week ses- cognitive tasks, the effect was statisti- cognitive status. The findings strongly sions. Each training group focused on cally significant for the exercise but not support a positive correlation of mental one of the following: memory (episodic

180 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE • VOLUME 64, NUMBER 4 list-learning), reasoning or speed of the Odyssey program) compared to pre- Further work is needed to determine processing. All participants were tested test (prior to the start of the program) whether memory skills, especially in all three cognitive domains at the assessments of the speed of informa- episodic memory (not assessed in the end of the training period, and yearly tion processing, inductive reasoning Stine-Morrow [2008] et al. study) could thereafter. Each of the three types of and divergent thinking (e.g., generating also be improved by the type of group- cognitive training yielded improved word associations or coming up with based, intensive, cognitive training ex- performance in the cognitive domain alternate/unusual uses of objects). The emplifi ed by the Odyssey program. being trained (e.g., memory training im- authors acknowledge that these im- Understanding memory, brain and aging proved memory performance); however, proved cognitive abilities may not be there was no transfer of these training maintained over a longer period of time During the past 10 to 15 years, major effects to cognitive domains that were in the absence of further engagement in advances have been made in our un- not trained (Ball et al. 2002). The larg- the Odyssey or some similar program. derstanding of the nature of memory est training effects occurred for speed Nonetheless, these fi ndings demon- changes that occur in normal aging, of processing, and the smallest were strate the transfer of cognitive training/ as well as the brain underpinnings for for memory. Five-year follow up data engagement to thinking and reasoning these changes. There have also been showed that the initial training benefi ts skills that were not specifi cally trained. major advances in our understanding were still present, albeit much reduced (Willis et al. 2006). Salthouse’s (2006) review of the mental activity literature concluded tips for maintaining and, perhaps, improving brain and that although cognitive interventions memory functions in middle-to-older adulthood can improve performance, there is a dearth of evidence for the transfer of • Get regular medical checkups and training to untrained tasks (even within make it a lifelong goal to maintain the same cognitive domain, such as healthy blood pressure, weight and episodic memory), or for long-lasting cholesterol levels. benefi ts. Based on a meta-analysis of • Remind yourself, regularly, that randomized control trials of cognitive “What is good for my heart is also iStockphoto/Steve Debenport intervention, many of which included good for my brain.” memory training, Papp et al. (2009) also concluded that there was no evidence • Engage in challenging and interesting for the generalizability or long-term cognitive activities (e.g., start learning, or benefi ts of training, with the important re-learning, a second language). caveat that few studies have incorpo-

• Exercise regularly (e.g., 30 minutes of iStockphoto/Chris Rogers rated long-term follow-up. However, the brisk walking daily). vast majority of cognitive intervention studies have entailed fewer than 10 • Participate in social activities, training sessions; it is possible that with via community organizations, a larger number of training sessions, special-interest clubs, etc. signifi cant, long-term benefi ts could be • Take up dancing (this activity obtained. has physical, mental and social iStockphoto/Brian Senic On a more positive note, an intrigu- components) or some other ing experimental fi eld study on cogni- “multicomponent” activity. tive training by Stine-Morrow et al. (2008) provided evidence that older • Eat a well-balanced diet with adults who are immersed in a 6-month plenty of fruits and vegetables program of group-based, creative (supplying vitamins and minerals that are problem-solving (“Senior Odyssey,” important for brain function). modeled after the international • Eat fi sh that is high in omega-3 fatty ac-

“Odyssey of the Mind” program for ids (e.g., salmon and trout) several times National Institutes of Health children and young adults) show posi- per week, or take a daily supplement for tive changes in fl uid cognitive abilities omega-3 fatty acids. (i.e., the processing and manipulation of information) that were not explicitly • Keep levels as low as possible (medi- trained via the Odyssey program. More tation, yoga and exercise can all help with specifi cally, the Odyssey participants stress reduction). showed signifi cant increases in perfor- • Get 7 to 8 hours of sleep per night. mance in comparison to controls for post-test (7 to 8 months after the start of

http://californiaagriculture.ucanr.org • OCTOBER–DECEMBER 2010 181 of the variability in neurocognitive ag- aspects of cognition (e.g., episodic mem- of these treatments leading to satis- ing, including, on the positive end of ory). Indeed, the Scaffolding Theory of factory memory performance and the continuum, documentation of older Aging and Cognition is based on com- relatively independent living well into adults who show no brain or cognitive pensatory scaffolding, that is, the re- the ninth and tenth decades of life. changes over several years (Burgmans cruitment of additional neural networks Successful treatments would presum- et al. 2009). Evidence for brain plastic- to support declining networks whose ably be those that result in increased ity in late adulthood continues to grow; functions have become inefficient and/ brain scaffolding, made possible by the this includes findings of neurogen- or noisy (Park and Reuter-Lorenz 2009). multiple mechanisms of neural plastic- esis as well as age-related changes in The challenge going forward is to fur- ity that continue to function in older patterns of brain activation that are ther advance our understanding of the adulthood. associated with improved cognitive biological as well as psychological as- performance. pects of memory functioning in normal Generally, age-related increases in aging, such that specific lifestyle (such B.A. Ober is Professor, Department of Human and brain activations (e.g., frontal lobes) are as exercise regimen and dietary supple- Community Development, UC Davis. The Guest interpreted as compensating for shrink- ments) and pharmacological treatments Associate Editor for this article was Lisa M. Soed- age in numerous brain structures (e.g., can be recommended to middle-aged erberg Miller, Associate Professor, Department of hippocampus) and declines in some and older adults, with a high likelihood Human and Community Development, UC Davis.

References Hopkins RO, Kesner RP, Goldstein M. 1995. Item and Salthouse TA. 2006. Mental exercise and mental ag- order recognition memory in subjects with hypoxic ing: Evaluating the validity of the “use it or lose it” Badre D, Wagner AD. 2002. Semantic retrieval, mne- brain injury. Brain Cognition 27(2):180–201. hypothesis. Perspect Psychol Sci 1(1):68–87. monic control and prefrontal cortex. Behav Cogn Neu- rosci Rev 1(3):206–18.­ Kempermann G. 2006. Adult Neurogenesis: Stem Cells Schacter DL, Tulving E. 1994. What are the memory and Neuronal Development in the Adult Brain. New systems of 1994? In: Schacter DL, Tulving E (eds.). Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, et al. 2002. Effects of York, NY: Oxford Univ Pr. 448 p. Memory Systems 1994. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pr. p cognitive training interventions with older adults: A 1–38. randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(18):2271–81. Kramer AF, Bherer L, Colcombe SJ, et al. 2004. Envi- ronmental influences on cognitive and brain plasticity Schacter DL, Wagner AD, Buckner RL. 2000. Memory Brookmeyer R, Johnson E, Ziegler-Graham K, Arrighi during aging. J Gerontol: A-Biol Sci 59(9):940–57. systems of 1999. In: Tulving E, Craik IM (eds.). The Ox- HM. 2007. Forecasting the global burden of Alzheim- ford Handbook of Memory. Oxford Univ Pr. p 627–43. er’s disease. Alzheimer Dementia 3:186–91. Kramer AF, Erickson KI. 2007. Capitalizing on cortical plasticity: Influence of physical activity on cognition Schonfield D, Robertson B. 1966. Memory storage and Budson AE, Price BH. 2005. Current concepts — mem- and brain function. Trend Cogn Sci 11(8):342–8. aging. Can J Psychol 20:228–36. ory dysfunction. New Engl J Med 352(7):692–9. Light LL, Prull MW, La Voie DJ, Healy MR. 2000. Dual- Snodgrass JG, Smith B, Feenan K, Corwin J. 1987. Burgmans S, van Boxtel MPJ, Vuurman EFPM, et al. process theories of memory in old age. In: Perfect TJ, Fragmenting pictures on the Apple Macintosh com- 2009. The prevalence of cortical gray matter atrophy Maylor EA (eds.). Models of Cognitive Aging: Debates puter for experimental and clinical applications. Beh may be overestimated in the healthy . Neu- in Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Pr. Res Method Instrument Computer 19:270–4. ropsychology 23(5):541–50. Markham JA, Greenough WT. 2004. Experience-driven Squire LR, Knowlton BJ. 2000. The medial temporal Burke DM, MacKay DG, Worthley JS, Wade E. 1991. brain plasticity: Beyond the synapse. Glia Biol lobe, the hippocampus and the memory systems of On the —­ what causes word-finding 1(4):351–63. the brain. New Cognitive Neurosci:765–79. failures in young and older adults? J Mem Lang 30(5):542–79. Ober BA. 2002. RT and non-RT methodology for Stine-Morrow EAL, Parisi JM, Morrow DG, Park DC. semantic priming research with Alzheimer’s disease 2008. The effects of an engaged lifestyle on cognitive Colcombe S, Kramer AF. 2003. Fitness effects on the patients: A critical review. J Clin Exp Neuropsyc vitality: A field experiment. Psychol Aging 23(4):778– cognitive function of older adults: A meta-analytic 24(7):883–911. 86. study. Psychol Sci 14(2):125–30. Ober BA, Shenaut GK, Jagust WJ, Stillman RC. 1991. US Census Bureau. 2010. State and County Quick Erickson KI, Prakash RS, Voss MW, et al. 2009. Aerobic Automatic semantic priming with various category Facts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000. fitness is associated with hippocampal volume in el- relations in Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging. Psy- html. derly humans. Hippocampus 19(10):1030–9. chol Aging 6(4):647–60. Valenzuela MJ, Sachdev P, Wen W, et al. 2008. Life Froger C, Taconnat L, Landre L, et al. 2009. Effects of Oliver RT, Thompson-Schill SL. 2003. Dorsal stream ac- span mental activity predicts diminished rate of hippo- level of processing at encoding and types of retrieval tivation during retrieval of object size and shape. Cogn campal atrophy. PLoS One 3(7):e2598. task in mild cognitive impairment and normal aging. Affect Behav Neurosci 3(4):309–22. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31(3):312–21. Wen W, Sachdev P. 2004. The topography of white Papp KV, Walsh SJ, Snyder PJ. 2009. Immediate and matter hyperintensities on brain MRI in healthy 60-to- Head D, Buckner RL, Shimony JS, et al. 2004. Differ- delayed effects of cognitive interventions in healthy 64-year-old individuals. Neuroimage 22(1):144–54. ential vulnerability of anterior white matter in nonde- elderly: A review of current literature and future direc- mented aging with minimal acceleration in dementia tions. Alzheimer Dementia 5:50–60. Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, et al. 2006. of the Alzheimer type: Evidence from diffusion tensor Long-term effects of cognitive training on every- imaging. Cereb Cortex 14(4):410–23. Park DC, Lautenschlager G, Hedden T, et al. 2002. day functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the 296(23):2805–14. Heine MK, Ober BA, Shenaut GK. 1999. Naturally oc- adult life span. Psychol Aging 17:299–320. curring and experimentally induced tip-of-the-tongue Wilson RS, Scherr PA, Schneider JA, et al. 2007. Rela- experiences in three adult age groups. Psychol Aging Park DC, Reuter-Lorenz P. 2009. The adaptive brain: tion of cognitive activity to risk of developing Alzheim- 14(3):445–57. Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Ann Rev Psy- er’s disease. Neurology 69:1911–20. chol 60:173–96. Hertzog C, Kramer AF, Wilson RS, Lindenberger U. Zola-Morgan S, Squire LR, Amaral DG. 1986. Human 2009. Enrichment effects on adult cognitive develop- Raz N, Lindenberger U, Rodrigue KM, et al. 2005. Re- amnesia and the medial temporal region — endur- ment. Can the functional capacity of older adults be gional brain changes in aging healthy adults: General ing memory impairment following a bilateral lesion preserved and enhanced? Psychol Sci Public Interest trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cereb limited to field CA1 of the hippocampus. J Neurosci 9:1–65. Cortex 15(11):1676–89. 6(10):2950–67.

182 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE • VOLUME 64, NUMBER 4