13E-061 (30 Pages) - Amended

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

13E-061 (30 Pages) - Amended 13E-061 (30 pages) - Amended 49 CFR Part 573 Noncompliance Information Report for Original Equipment Report Date: November 19, 2013 On November 1, 2013 Indiana Mills and Manufacturing Inc. (“IMMI”) determined that a potential noncompliance with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 209 exists in certain seat belt assemblies that are equipped with L9 seat belt buckles. These seat belt assemblies were sold to numerous customers as items of original equipment. IMMI is furnishing this notification to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in accordance with 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. IMMI’s investigation is ongoing. 1. Manufacturer: Indiana Mills and Manufacturing Inc. 18881 US 31 North Westfield, IN 46074 Contact Person: Lisa Hanson Director of Corporate Quality Phone: 317‐867‐8451 Fax: 317‐896‐2142 IMMI Page | 1 13E-061 (30 pages) - Amended 2. Identification of Motor Vehicle Equipment Potentially Containing the Noncompliance Certain IMMI seat belt assemblies that are equipped with L9 end‐release seat belt buckles are potentially noncompliant with S4.3(g) of FMVSS 209. The suspect L9 buckles were produced at IMMI manufacturing facilities in Westfield, IN between August 2, 2013 and September 13, 2013, and in Saltillo, Mexico between August 8, 2013 and September 13, 2013. Seat belt assemblies, incorporating the suspect L9 buckles, were manufactured between August 2, 2013 and October 25, 2013 at IMMI’s Westfield, IN manufacturing facility and between August 8, 2013 and October 31, 2013 at IMMI’s Saltillo, Mexico facility. Basis for determining the recall population and description of how the equipment differs from similar equipment not included in the population The component of the seat belt assemblies that caused them to be noncompliant is the locking pawl (part number 916030) inside the L9 buckle. The suspect L9 buckles contain locking pawls from specific manufacturing lots. Some of the locking pawls from those lots were produced with an excessively large burr on the locking surface. The locking pawls were manufactured in the United States. The company that manufactured the locking pawls is: Mursix Corporation 2401 N Executive Park Drive Yorktown, IN 47396 (765) 282‐2221 The name, address and telephone number of each customer that purchased the suspect seat belt assemblies for use or installation as original equipment in new motor vehicles or new items of motor vehicle equipment is attached as Appendix A. Appendix A also shows the IMMI part numbers of the seat belt assemblies sold to each customer. 3. Total Number of Potentially Noncompliant Items of Equipment The total number of potentially noncompliant seat belt assemblies that are subject to FMVSS 209 is approximately 74,000. The number of such assemblies shipped to each customer is shown on the list in Appendix A. However, IMMI has been informed that some of those customers have replaced the suspect L9 buckles in assemblies in their inventories and in their vehicles before those vehicles were delivered to dealers or customers. As of the date of this report (revision 1), IMMI estimates that approximately 6,700 potentially noncompliant L9 buckles have been captured and replaced before vehicles were sold to purchasers. 4. Percentage of Items of Equipment Estimated to Contain the Noncompliance Approximately 1%. IMMI Page | 2 13E-061 (30 pages) - Amended 5. Description of the Noncompliance Certain IMMI seat belt assemblies equipped with L9 buckles do not satisfy the requirements of S4.3 (g) of FMVSS 209. When the push button on the buckle is pressed to release the latch plate for egress, the latch plate can become partially engaged with the buckle. Under this circumstance, the partially engaged latch plate may not separate from the buckle when a force of 22N is applied. The root cause of the noncompliance is associated with the locking pawl (part number 916030) inside the L9 buckle. Some locking pawls from specific manufacturing lots were produced with an excessively large burr. The burr on the locking pawl can catch the edge of the latch plate when the button is pressed to unlatch the buckle, causing a partial engagement condition. 7. Information Considered by IMMI in Deciding That a Noncompliance Exists On October 15, 2013, IMMI received a complaint from a vehicle manufacturer indicating that inspectors in its assembly plant had encountered difficulty in releasing some seat belt assemblies equipped with L9 buckles. On October 16, 2013, IMMI personnel traveled to the customer’s assembly plant to investigate the situation. The suspect seat belt assemblies were brought to IMMI for evaluation. On October 17, 2013, IMMI personnel traveled to another vehicle assembly plant to investigate a similar complaint. Suspect seat belt assemblies from that plant were also brought to IMMI for evaluation. Beginning on October 16, 2013, IMMI Quality Assurance and Engineering personnel tested and measured the returned buckles as well as other buckles on‐hand. The results of those tests indicated that each returned buckle latched completely when the latch plate was inserted. When the push button on the buckle is pressed to release the latch while the latch plate has some lateral force applied to it, the latch plate can become partially engaged with the buckle. To better assess the issue, IMMI developed a new test fixture to apply lateral forces to the latch plate during the evaluation of partial engagement. IMMI found that some of the returned L9 buckles could be placed into a partial engagement condition using this test fixture, and that the latch plate would not separate when a 22N force was applied. On the basis of its investigation and testing, on November 1, 2013, IMMI determined that a noncompliance with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 209 exists in some of the seat belt assemblies identified in Section 2 above. IMMI has received no report of accidents or injuries associated with this noncompliance. IMMI Page | 3 13E-061 (30 pages) - Amended 8. Remedy Program IMMI has notified all customers that received the suspect seat belt assemblies of this noncompliance decision and IMMI will work with those customers to provide replacement buckles for all vehicles that were sold with the potentially noncompliant seat belt assemblies. Document Revision History Revision Date Description 0 11/8/2013 Initial Submission 1 11/19/2013 Section 3: Updated quantities based on new information Appendix A: Updated list based on new information IMMI Page | 4 13E-061 (30 pages) - Amended IMMI 49 CFR Part 573 Noncompliance Information Report for Original Equipment Appendix A ‐ Revision 1 Ship To State/ Ship to Ship To HQ Phone Customer Name Ship To Address1 Ship To City Province Postal Code Country Number IMMI P/N Qty ALLIANCE BUS GROUP, INC. 21537 E. QUINCY AVE AURORA CO 80013 US 770-305-0060 F118301 1 ALLIANCE BUS GROUP, INC. 5845 LEES MILL ROAD FOREST PARK GA 30297 US 770-305-0060 F118301 22 ALLIANCE BUS GROUP, INC. Total 23 AMERICAN MIDWEST FLEET SOLUTIONS 1105 E 31 ST LA GRANGE PARK IL 60526 US 816-697-1927 F111703 1 AMERICAN MIDWEST FLEET SOLUTIONS Total 1 AMERICAN SEATING 25800 CLAWITER ROAD HAYWARD CA 94545 US 616-732-6600 F114900 1 AMERICAN SEATING 801 SEWARD, NW GRAND RAPIDS MI 49504 US 616-732-6600 F105595 18 AMERICAN SEATING 801 SEWARD, NW GRAND RAPIDS MI 49504 US 616-732-6600 F114878 13 AMERICAN SEATING 801 SEWARD, NW GRAND RAPIDS MI 49504 US 616-732-6600 F114883 2 AMERICAN SEATING 801 SEWARD, NW GRAND RAPIDS MI 49504 US 616-732-6600 F114900 5 AMERICAN SEATING 801 SEWARD, NW GRAND RAPIDS MI 49504 US 616-732-6600 F114901 8 AMERICAN SEATING 801 SEWARD, NW GRAND RAPIDS MI 49504 US 616-732-6600 F116146 1 AMERICAN SEATING 801 SEWARD, NW GRAND RAPIDS MI 49504 US 616-732-6600 F116174 1 AMERICAN SEATING 801 SEWARD, NW GRAND RAPIDS MI 49504 US 616-732-6600 F123305 1 AMERICAN SEATING Total 50 AUTOBUS LION, INC. 921 CH DE LA RIVIERE-DU-NORD ST-JEROME QUEBEC J7Y 5G2 CA 450-432-5466 F114852 20 AUTOBUS LION, INC. Total 20 AUTOCAR, LLC 551 SOUTH WASHINGTON ST HAGERSTOWN IN 47346 US 765-489-5499 F115640 12 AUTOCAR, LLC Total 12 BLUE BIRD BODY CO 2338 US ST. RTE. 42 DELAWARE OH 43015 US 478-825-2021 F111224 5 BLUE BIRD BODY CO 2338 US ST. RTE. 42 DELAWARE OH 43015 US 478-825-2021 F111225 6 BLUE BIRD BODY CO 2338 US ST. RTE. 42 DELAWARE OH 43015 US 478-825-2021 F111226 1 BLUE BIRD BODY CO 2338 US ST. RTE. 42 DELAWARE OH 43015 US 478-825-2021 F111228 12 BLUE BIRD BODY CO 402 BLUE BIRD BLVD FORT VALLEY GA 31030 US 478-825-2021 F103687 1 BLUE BIRD BODY CO 402 BLUE BIRD BLVD FORT VALLEY GA 31030 US 478-825-2021 F111224 350 BLUE BIRD BODY CO 402 BLUE BIRD BLVD FORT VALLEY GA 31030 US 478-825-2021 F111225 99 BLUE BIRD BODY CO 402 BLUE BIRD BLVD FORT VALLEY GA 31030 US 478-825-2021 F111226 103 BLUE BIRD BODY CO 402 BLUE BIRD BLVD FORT VALLEY GA 31030 US 478-825-2021 F111228 80 BLUE BIRD BODY CO 402 BLUE BIRD BLVD FORT VALLEY GA 31030 US 478-825-2021 F111230 26 BLUE BIRD BODY CO 402 BLUE BIRD BLVD FORT VALLEY GA 31030 US 478-825-2021 F111232 12 BLUE BIRD BODY CO Total 695 BUS WEST 3235 UNION AVE. SAN JOSE CA 95124 US 310-984-3900 F118035 2 BUS WEST Total 2 COLLINS BUS CORP (SG MAIN) 1065 BELVOIR ROAD PLYMOUTH MEETINGPA 19462 US 620-662-9000 F115177 90 Page 1 13E-061 (30 pages) - Amended IMMI 49 CFR Part 573 Noncompliance Information Report for Original Equipment Appendix A ‐ Revision 1 Ship To State/ Ship to Ship To HQ Phone Customer Name Ship To Address1 Ship To City Province Postal Code Country Number IMMI P/N Qty COLLINS BUS CORP (SG MAIN) 1065 BELVOIR
Recommended publications
  • Express Rules and Regulations
    Greyhound Lines, Inc. PACKAGE EXPRESS TARIFF AND SALES MANUAL Created and maintained by Revenue Development Department email: [email protected] GREYHOUND LINES, INC. PACKAGE EXPRESS TARIFF AND SALES MANUAL EXPRESS RULES, REGULATIONS, RATES, AND CHARGES Table of Contents Page Instructions and contacts ................................................................................................................................................................. 1.5 Carriers -- Local and Interline .......................................................................................................................................................... 1.6 Carriers -- Interline only....................................................................................................................................................1.6 and 1.7 Determination of Applicable Express Rate Zones ........................................................................................................................... 1.8 Packing, Marking, Labeling, and Conditions of Acceptance ............................................................................................................ 1.8 Dimensional Weight Surcharge ....................................................................................................................................................... 1.9 Determination of Charges for Shipments Weighing in Excess of One Hundred Pounds ................................................................ 1.9 Types of Service Defined
    [Show full text]
  • On the Brink: 2021 Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry in the United States
    On the Brink: 2021 Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry in the United States BY JOSEPH SCHWIETERMAN, BRIAN ANTOLIN & CRYSTAL BELL JANUARY 30, 2021 CHADDICK INSTITUTE FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AT DEPAUL UNIVERSITY | POLICY SERIES THE STUDY TEAM AUTHORS BRIAN ANTOLIN, JOSEPH P. SCHWIETERMAN AND CRYSTAL BELL CARTOGRAPHY ALL TOGETHER STUDIO AND GRAPHICS ASSISTING MICHAEL R. WEINMAN AND PATRICIA CHEMKA SPERANZA OF PTSI TRANSPORTATION CONTRIBUTORS DATA KIMBERLY FAIR AND MITCH HIRST TEAM COVER BOTTOM CENTER: ANNA SHVETS; BOTTOM LEFT: SEE CAPTION ON PAGE 1; PHOTOGRAPHY TOP AND BOTTOM RIGHT: CHADDICK INSTITUTE The Chaddick Insttute does not receive funding from intercity bus lines or suppliers of bus operators. This report was paid for using general operatng funds. For further informaton, author bios, disclaimers, and cover image captons, see page 20. JOIN THE STUDY TEAM FOR A WEBINAR ON THIS STUDY: Friday, February 19, 2021 from noon to 1 pm CT (10 am PT) | Free Email [email protected] to register or for more info CHADDICK INSTITUTE FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AT DEPAUL UNIVERSITY CONTACT: JOSEPH SCHWIETERMAN, PH.D. | PHONE: 312.362.5732 | EMAIL: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The prognosis for the intercity bus industry remains uncertain due to the weakened financial condition of most scheduled operators and the unanswerable questions about the pace of a post-pandemic recovery. This year’s Outlook for the Intercity Bus Industry report draws attention to some of the industry’s changing fundamentals while also looking at notable developments anticipated this year and beyond. Our analysis evaluates the industry in six areas: i) The status of bus travel booking through January 2021; ii) Notable marketing and service developments of 2020; iii) The decline of the national bus network sold on greyhound.com that is relied upon by travelers on thousands of routes across the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Reference Marks for Greyhound Lines
    STANDARD REFERENCE MARKS FOR GREYHOUND LINES All schedules operate daily unless otherwise noted Frequency Codes 1 Monday 4 Thursday 7 Sunday 2 Tuesday 5 Friday H Holiday 3 Wednesday 6 Saturday X Except Example: X67H Equals Except Saturday, Sunday, Holiday Holiday Service New Year's Day, President's Day (where specified), Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas Standard Symbols/Abbreviations r Break or Meal Stop AR Arrive D Stops only to discharge passengers at agency or in town. Times shown are approximate. DH Discharge at highway interchange dh Deadhead E Stops at agency only to discharges passengers or express. Times shown are approximate. f Flag stop. Bus will stop on signal to receive and discharge passengers. h Holds for connection HS Highway stop - does not go into town or agency. LV Leave R Restricted service between points indicated Carrier Codes GL Greyhound Lines, Inc. NYT New York Trailways ADT Adirondack Trailways ORB Orange Belt Stages CCC Carolina Trailways PPB Peter Pan Trailways CML Capitol Motor Lines SES Southeastern Stages COT Colonial Trailways TNO Texas, New Mexico & Oklahoma Coaches CPB Capitol Trailways of Pennsylvania VT Vermont Transit JL Jefferson Lines VTC Valley Transit KBC Kerrville Bus Company Time Zones ET Eastern Time MT Mountain Time EST Eastern Standard Time MST Mountain Standard Time EDT Eastern Daylight Time MDT Mountain Daylight Time CT Central Time PT Pacific Time CST Central Standard Time PST Pacific Standard Time CDT Central Daylight Time PDT Pacific Daylight Time.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Arizona
    APRIL 2015 - ARIZONA TOWN HALL TRANSPORTATION & ARIZONA 2014-2015 ARIZONA TOWN HALL OFFICERS, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, COMMITTEE CHAIRS, AND STAFF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS The Officers and the following: J. Scott Rhodes Cathy Weiss Arlan Colton EX OFFICIO Board Chair Secretary Trinity Donovan Ron Walker Linda Elliott-Nelson Mark Nexsen James Jayne Board Chair Elect Treasurer Frances Mclane Merryman Steven Betts Richard Morrison Vice Chair Alberto Olivas BOARD OF DIRECTORS Steven A. Betts Linda J. Elliott-Nelson John C. Maynard Sandra L. Smith President, Chanen Development Dean of Instruction, Arizona Supervisor, Santa Cruz President and CEO, Pinal Company, Inc., Phoenix Western College, Yuma County, Nogales Partnership; Fmr. Member, Brian Bickel Julie Engel Patrick McWhortor Pinal County Board of Ret. CEO, Southeast Arizona President & CEO, Greater Yuma President & CEO, Alliance of Supervisors, Apache Junction Medical Center, Douglas Economic Development, Yuma Arizona Nonprofits, Phoenix Ken L. Strobeck Sandra Bierman Catherine M. Foley Frances McLane Merryman Executive Director, League of Director of Legal Services, Blue Cross Executive Director, Arizona Vice President & Senior Arizona Cities & Towns, Phoenix Blue Shield of Arizona, Phoenix Citizens for the Arts, Phoenix Wealth Strategist, Northern Michael Stull Kerry Blume Jennifer Frownfelter Trust Company, Tucson Manager, Public & Consultant, Flagstaff Vice President, URS Richard N. Morrison Government Relations, Cox Richard M. Bowen Corporation, Phoenix Attorney, Salmon, Lewis & Communications, Phoenix Associate Vice President, Economic Richard E. Gordon Weldon, PLC, Gilbert W. Vincent Thelander III Development and Sustainability, Pima County Superior Court Robyn Nebrich Vice President & Senior Client Northern Arizona University Juvenile Judge, Tucson Assistant Development Director, Manager, Bank of America, Phoenix Sheila R.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Appendix 1 Codes Prep Codes, Data Element 751
    VOLVO Applications of ASC 12 Version: 9705-4 Published 2005-02-10 1. Appendix 1 Codes Prep Codes, Data element 751 00 According to Drawing 01 No Surface Treatment 02 Primer, Undercoats or Corr. Finish 03 Rustproof, parts ‘Y700/3’ 04 Top Coat 05 Zinc-plating 06 Hot Zinc Coat 09 Prep According to separate notes 14 Top Coat, Black 15 Top Coat, Black, High Gloss Packaging Codes, Data element 754 A Vendor packs in VTNA multiple package quantity B Vendor packages individually in suitable container C Vendor packs multiple components into individual kits D VTNA packs in selling multiple (corr container) E VTNA packs in selling multiple (merchandising carton) F VTNA packs individually (corr container) G VTNA packs individually (merchandise carton) H VTNA packs individually (wood crate) K VTNA packs multiple components into kits L VTNA packages individually (polybag) M VTNA packs in selling multiple (polybag) N Vendor: quantity ordered is for sets not pieces P VTNA special packaging instructions S Please cut and supply in .... foot lengths T Vendor cut and supply in .... meter lengths Z Package to VTNA work instruction 930.350 issue 02 VV Description gives an extended code, the Volvo company involved will gives a separate instruction about the codes. Appendix 1 Codes 1:1 VOLVO Applications of ASC 12 Version: 9705-4 Published 2005-02-10 Ship/Delivery or Calendar Pattern Codes, Data element 678 Code Description A Monday through Friday B Monday through Saturday C Monday through Sunday D Monday E Tuesday F Wednesday G Thursday H Friday J Saturday K Sunday L Monday through Thursday M Immediately N As Directed O Daily Mon.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Loading and Unloading Cargo on Commercial Truck Driver Alertness and 9-30-0 Performance 6
    Effects of Loading and Unloading U.S. Department of Transportation Cargo on Commercial Truck Driver Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Alertness and Performance DOT-MC-01-107 May 2001 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT-MC-01-107 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Effects of Loading and Unloading Cargo on Commercial Truck Driver Alertness and 9-30-0 Performance 6. Performing Organization Code 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author(s) Gerald P. Krueger, Ph.D. & Susan B. Van Hemel Ph.D. T rucking Research Institute American 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No (TRAIS) Trucking Research Institute American Trucking Associations Foundation 1 1 . Contract or Grant No. 2200 Mill Road DTFH-96-X -00022 Alexandria,15. Virginia 22314 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Final Report Office16. Of Research and Technology July 1996 - September 2000 400 Seventh Street, SW 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 Supplementary Notes The Contracting Officer's Technical Representative was Robert J. Carroll, FMCSA Office of Research and Technology This study was performed by Star Mountain, Inc. of Alexandria, VA, in cooperation with The American Trucking Associations Foundation, Trucking Research Institute. Abstract This report describes Phase I of a two-phased assessment of the effects of loading and unloading cargo on truck drivers alertness and performance. The report, which documents work done on three Phase I tasks, contains: a) a comprehensive behavioral and physiological sciences literature review regarding sustained performance and operator fatigue, with a focus on the effects of expending physical work energy on operator fatigue.
    [Show full text]
  • Greyhound Lines, Inc
    Greyhound Lines, Inc. Rural Feeder Service Handbook February 2007 I. Introduction 3 II. Types & Nature of Feeder Services 4 III. Insurance Requirements 5 IV. Fares & Ticketing 5 V. Baggage Service 7 VI. Package Express Service 7 VII. Fare & Schedule Information 7 VIII. Marketing & Advertising 7 IX. Terminal & Station Access 7 X. Commission Agency 8 XI. Training & Assistance 8 X. 5311(f) Grant Assistance for Rural Feeder Services 9 2 I. Introduction Greyhound has a strong interest in creating and maintaining successful interline relationships with coordinated rural feeder services that are meaningful for customers and make sense for both Greyhound and the rural feeder service partner. This is demonstrated by the company’s efforts in: • Helping clarify and lower Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) insurance levels for rural transportation agencies • Creating a special National Bus Traffic Association (NBTA) “sponsored transit category” with minimal costs & hassles. NBTA is a non-profit revenue clearinghouse for interlined bus operators. • Effectively working one-on-one with rural transportation agencies to help them establish feeder services Greyhound initiated a service, called the Greyhound Rural Connection Program, in the late 1980’s. The program linked over 80 rural transit agencies in 17 states and added more than 800 communities to the intercity bus network. Many of those agencies continue to provide their customers with informal access to the nearest Greyhound terminal or station even today. But those efforts were limited by: • Insufficient Federal funding and support • Lack of a flexible ticketing solution • Sophisticated fare and schedule information technology As the 5311(f) program evolved from ISTEA to SAFETEA-LU, Federal funding and guidance has improved dramatically, flexible ticketing solutions now exist, and fare and schedule information technology has seen tremendous advances --- so much so that rural feeder services can now be effectively implemented and operated in meaningful ways for the traveling public.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Companies and Headquarters
    BUSINESS & ECONOMY | MAJOR COMPANIES AND HEADQUARTERS BUSINESS & ECONOMY Ericsson Financial Professional BNSF Logistics Essilor Activities & Business BNSF Railway Major Companies and Headquarters Farmer Brothers Boeing Global Services AAA Texas Services Flowserve Corporation Alkami Technology Container Store Group The Dallas-Fort Worth Accenture A critical mass of headquarters Forterra Copart USA region has been a Allstate Alliance Data Fossil Group Core-Mark magnet for corporate | and major company operations Associa AT&T headquarters and major Frito-Lay Dallas Love Field Bank of America HEADQUARTERS AND COMPANIES MAJOR company operations, Atos attracting 23 Fortune 500 Fujitsu Network BBVA DFW International HollyFrontier Brinker International Communications Conifer Health Solutions Airport company headquarters Construction Hunt Consolidated/Hunt CEC Entertainment Capital One Auto (Core-Mark will make 24 AECOM General Motors CoreLogic FedEx Oil Finance when the newest list is Andres Construction Cinemark Holdings Integer Holdings CROSSMARK Gamestop Luminant CBRE released this summer), Services Cinépolis CyrusOne and 43 headquarters Interceramic Charles Schwab Greyhound Lines Austin Industries Matador Resources among the Fortune 1000. ClubCorp Holdings Interstate Battery Deloitte Hilti North America Oncor Electric Delivery Citigroup In 2019, Charles Schwab Balfour Beatty CorePoint Lodging Justin Brands DXC Technology J.C. Penney announced they, too, will Pioneer Natural Resources Comerica Beck Group Dave & Buster’s Exela Technologies relocate to DFW. A diverse Keurig Dr Pepper Elevate Credit Inc Kroger Brandt Range Resources group of household names Del Frisco’s Restaurant Kimberly-Clark EY Match.com Reliant Energy Group Federal Reserve Bank of such as ExxonMobil, Builders Firstsource Kronos Worldwide Dallas F e d E X O i c e McLaren Texas Instruments, Centex Corporation TXU Fiesta Restaurant Group AT&T, American Airlines, Kubota Fidelity Investments Freeman Company Michaels Companies U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • William Emanuel Nomination for Member of the National Labor Relations Board” Hearing Date: July 13, 2017
    Questions for the Record “William Emanuel Nomination for Member of the National Labor Relations Board” Hearing Date: July 13, 2017 Questions for the Record from Ranking Member Patty Murray 1. What, in your view, is the mission of the agency to which you have been nominated? To enforce the National Labor Relations Act as enacted by Congress. 2. Do you believe that the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), enforced by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board), is to encourage and protect workers’ rights to organize and engage in collective bargaining with their employers? If not, please describe in detail your views on the purpose of the NLRA and the Board. As stated in Section 1 of the NLRA, one purpose is “to eliminate the causes of certain substantial obstructions to the free flow of commerce and to mitigate and eliminate these obstructions when they have occurred by encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining and by promoting the exercise by workers of full freedom of association, self-organization, and designation of representatives of their own choosing, for the purpose of negotiating the terms and conditions of their employment or other mutual aid or protection.” In 1947, the NLRA was amended to add several additional purposes: (1) “to prescribe the legitimate rights of both employees and employers in their relations affecting commerce,” (2) “to provide orderly and peaceful procedures for preventing the interference by either with the legitimate rights of the other,” (3) “to protect the rights of individual employees in their relations with labor organizations whose activities affect commerce,” (4) “to define and proscribe practices on the part of labor and management which affect commerce and are inimical to the general welfare,” and (5) “to protect the rights of the public in connection with labor disputes affecting commerce.” 1 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Riding Greyhound with a Warrant
    Riding Greyhound With A Warrant Algernon usually stage finitely or countersigns downstairs when teachable Darth apply pithy and operationally. Larry is stereophonicallyasymmetrically benefic enough, after is Giffardabatable subdorsal? Chrissy flubbing his crib uncommonly. When Nat merchant his peignoirs mismated not Check in a greyhound warrant is only six cases There with riding in a warrant issued him in massachusetts to disembark, maryland news and. Because greyhound riders during those busses at rest. But also announcing this court rules which do exist in a problem, and views its own a printable image: facebook clicks on riding greyhound a warrant and. Border patrol says that police could be greater context about trump administration took him in spokane, schedules and observed him. Spanish so that everyone could understand. But Joe Schmo riding a bus doing it but minding his stage business. Miller said at the meeting. Border with greyhound bus company should not consent, but are some americans pressured the warrant? Trimble was riding greyhound with a warrant, deyvid was riding the warrant until the atu believes that the andes. Outside of holm decision prior court, squeezed it was enough to an agent questions passengers of methamphetamine, and found on your facebook warnings for? Richard Anderson made to Congress last month. Greyhound to stop allowing immigration checks Glock Talk. Border with riding greyhound with a warrant or with riding and. Infoplease is greyhound assures riders later this article was riding a detailed answer questions. Mutuel Wagering, Waiver Investigative Report No. Big country legally carry on domestic routes to an immigration enforcement could it is no immediate changes were plenty of river steamship, juvenile crimes unit addresses problem with riding greyhound.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversionsbcm
    July 2019 ConversionsBCM The Yankee Clipper - A 2001 Thomas Built Bus Doug & Cindy white Passenger vs. Private Car Driving By JC Alacoque Pulling A Series 60 Out of A Donor Bus by Mason Chipperfield Greyhound Buses Through the Years Part II By larry plancho 2 BCM BUS CONVERSION July 2019 PUBLISHER’S NOTE make it easier getting in and out Oregon Bus Tuning of some parking lots with a bit of a Oregon is a beautiful state. I trav- dip at the entrance or a rise to get eled up the west coast from Ana- into the parking lot. heim, CA as I stated last month and GARY HATT took my time driving up the red roads to get here Joe is also replacing my aging air rather than I-5 where all you do is bypass cities and compressor on my Series 60 with a larger one. I am have a hard time seeing anything along the way. upgrading from a 500 CFM to a 750 CFM compres- sor as a bus needs all of the air it can get for braking I had the opportunity to travel with no set timelines on long downhill grades and it will air up faster in the and no specific goals in mind except to see the coun- mornings. A lot of maintenance I do on my bus make try and visit friends along the way. This is the first it better then when it came off the factory floor 50 time in a long time where I did not have to be some- years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decline and Revival of Intercity Bus Service
    TRN_303.e$S_TRN_303 7/1/16 11:46 AM Page 4 The Bus Renaissance P HOTO : R YAN J OHNSON , C ITY OF N ORTH C HARLESTON The Decline and Revival of Intercity Bus Service JOSEPH P. SCHWIETERMAN resurgence in intercity bus service is chang- lifestyle—appear to be part of the mix, as are the The author is Director and ing commercial competition for travelers expanding capabilities of personal electronic tech- Professor, Chaddick Insti - between many cities in the United States. A nology, such as travel apps that make ticket pur- tute for Metropolitan A bevy of new curbside operators—including BoltBus, chases easier. Energy-efficient bus travel also gained Development, DePaul Go Buses, and Megabus—are rejuvenating a sector appeal with the dramatic escalation of fuel prices, University, Chicago, regarded as “a mode of last resort” only a decade which made single-occupant driving less afford- Illinois, and coauthor of an ago. The new services are making significant changes able—although this factor has subsided recently as annual year-in-review of to downtown-to-downtown routes of 125 to 350 oil prices have plummeted. the intercity bus industry. miles—distances considered too short for airline The increase in bus travel has raised issues for trips but uncomfortably long for driving. transportation planners and researchers—notably, Several factors are spurring the intercity bus phe- curbside congestion during arrivals and departures, For potential riders, free Wi-Fi access has raised nomenon. Airport hassles, aggressive pricing strate- the safety of the so-called Chinatown carriers, and the profile of commuter, gies, and an infusion of overseas capital are important the diversion of traffic from state-supported rail ser- TR NEWS 303 MAY–JUNE 2016 TR NEWS 303 MAY–JUNE regional, and intercity contributors.
    [Show full text]