Guide to the New
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
										Recommended publications
									
								- 
												  Transgender Representation on American Narrative Television from 2004-2014TRANSJACKING TELEVISION: TRANSGENDER REPRESENTATION ON AMERICAN NARRATIVE TELEVISION FROM 2004-2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Kelly K. Ryan May 2021 Examining Committee Members: Jan Fernback, Advisory Chair, Media and Communication Nancy Morris, Media and Communication Fabienne Darling-Wolf, Media and Communication Ron Becker, External Member, Miami University ABSTRACT This study considers the case of representation of transgender people and issues on American fictional television from 2004 to 2014, a period which represents a steady surge in transgender television characters relative to what came before, and prefigures a more recent burgeoning of transgender characters since 2014. The study thus positions the period of analysis as an historical period in the changing representation of transgender characters. A discourse analysis is employed that not only assesses the way that transgender characters have been represented, but contextualizes American fictional television depictions of transgender people within the broader sociopolitical landscape in which those depictions have emerged and which they likely inform. Television representations and the social milieu in which they are situated are considered as parallel, mutually informing discourses, including the ways in which those representations have been engaged discursively through reviews, news coverage and, in some cases, blogs. ii To Desmond, Oonagh and Eamonn For everything. And to my mother, Elaine Keisling, Who would have read the whole thing. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Throughout the research and writing of this dissertation, I have received a great deal of support and assistance, and therefore offer many thanks. To my Dissertation Chair, Jan Fernback, whose feedback on my writing and continued support and encouragement were invaluable to the completion of this project.
- 
												  Survival. Activism. Feminism?: Exploring the Lives of Trans* Individuals in ChicagoSURVIVAL. ACTIVISM. FEMINISM? Survival. Activism. Feminism?: Exploring the Lives of Trans* Individuals in Chicago Some radical lesbian feminists, like Sheila Jeffreys (1997, 2003, 2014) argue that trans individuals are destroying feminism by succumbing to the greater forces of the patriarchy and by opting for surgery, thus conforming to normative ideas of sex and gender. Jeffreys is not alone in her views. Janice Raymond (1994, 2015) also maintains that trans individuals work either as male-to-females (MTFs) to uphold stereotypes of femininity and womanhood, or as female-to-males (FTMs) to join the ranks of the oppressors, support the patriarchy, and embrace hegemonic masculinity. Both Jeffreys and Raymond conclude that sex/gender is fixed by genitals at birth and thus deny trans individuals their right to move beyond the identities that they were assigned at birth. Ironically, a paradox is created by these radical lesbians feminist theorists, who deny trans individuals the right to define their own lives and control their own bodies. Such essentialist discourse, however, fails to recognize the oppression, persecution, and violence to which trans individuals are subjected because they do not conform to the sex that they were assigned at birth. Jeffreys (1997) also claims there is an emergency and that the human rights of those who are now identifying as trans are being violated. These critiques are not only troubling to me, as a self-identified lesbian feminist, but are also illogical and transphobic. My research, with trans identified individuals in Chicago, presents a different story and will show another side of the complex relationship between trans and lesbian feminist communities.
- 
												  “I Used to Be Gifted:” Case Studies of Lost Potential Among Adolescent Females, Conducted by Ms“I USED TO BE GIFTED:” CASE STUDIES OF LOST POTENTIAL AMONG ADOLESCENT FEMALES A Dissertation by VIRGINIA MAURER MCDONNELL Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2005 Major Subject: Educational Psychology “I USED TO BE GIFTED:” CASE STUDIES OF LOST POTENTIAL AMONG ADOLESCENT FEMALES A Dissertation by VIRGINIA MAURER MCDONNELL Submitted to Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved as to style and content by: William R. Nash Michael J. Ash (Chair of Committee) (Member) Joyce E. Juntune G. Patrick Slattery, Jr. (Member) (Member) Michael R. Benz (Head of Department) May 2005 Major Subject: Educational Psychology iii ABSTRACT “I Used To Be Gifted:” Case Studies of Lost Potential Among Adolescent Females. (May 2005) Virginia Maurer McDonnell B.S., Iowa State University; M.S., Iowa State University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. William Nash This case study focuses on the influence of certain sociocultural factors on the ability of adolescent girls to fulfill their potentials. Specifically, the purpose of this research is to advance an alternative perspective on the relationship between the sociocultural influences of friendship, mother/daughter relationship, school experience, and body image and a loss of potential among adolescent girls from a historical, poststructural, postmodern-feminist perspective. The dissertation is presented in the form of narrative from both the author’s and girls’ and women’s perspectives in order to seek a rich and thick description. Throughout the study, the author integrates moments from her own journey during adolescence with the young girls and their mothers or grandmothers encountering the oftentimes overwhelming negative sociocultural challenges existing today.
- 
												  Delayed Critique: on Being Feminist, Time and Time AgainDelayed Critique: On Being Feminist, Time and Time Again In “On Being in Time with Feminism,” Robyn Emma McKenna is a Ph.D. candidate in English and Wiegman (2004) supports my contention that history, Cultural Studies at McMaster University. She is the au- theory, and pedagogy are central to thinking through thor of “‘Freedom to Choose”: Neoliberalism, Femi- the problems internal to feminism when she asks: “… nism, and Childcare in Canada.” what learning will ever be final?” (165) Positioning fem- inism as neither “an antidote to [n]or an ethical stance Abstract toward otherness,” Wiegman argues that “feminism it- In this article, I argue for a systematic critique of trans- self is our most challenging other” (164). I want to take phobia in feminism, advocating for a reconciling of seriously this claim in order to consider how feminism trans and feminist politics in community, pedagogy, is a kind of political intimacy that binds a subject to the and criticism. I claim that this critique is both delayed desire for an “Other-wise” (Thobani 2007). The content and productive. Using the Michigan Womyn’s Music of this “otherwise” is as varied as the projects that femi- Festival as a cultural archive of gender essentialism, I nism is called on to justify. In this paper, I consider the consider how rereading and revising politics might be marginalization of trans-feminism across mainstream, what is “essential” to feminism. lesbian feminist, and academic feminisms. Part of my interest in this analysis is the influence of the temporal Résumé on the way in which certain kinds of feminism are given Dans cet article, je défends l’idée d’une critique systéma- primacy in the representation of feminism.
- 
												  Transgender History / by Susan Strykeru.s. $12.95 gay/Lesbian studies Craving a smart and Comprehensive approaCh to transgender history historiCaL and Current topiCs in feminism? SEAL Studies Seal Studies helps you hone your analytical skills, susan stryker get informed, and have fun while you’re at it! transgender history HERE’S WHAT YOU’LL GET: • COVERAGE OF THE TOPIC IN ENGAGING AND AccESSIBLE LANGUAGE • PhOTOS, ILLUSTRATIONS, AND SIDEBARS • READERS’ gUIDES THAT PROMOTE CRITICAL ANALYSIS • EXTENSIVE BIBLIOGRAPHIES TO POINT YOU TO ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Transgender History covers American transgender history from the mid-twentieth century to today. From the transsexual and transvestite communities in the years following World War II to trans radicalism and social change in the ’60s and ’70s to the gender issues witnessed throughout the ’90s and ’00s, this introductory text will give you a foundation for understanding the developments, changes, strides, and setbacks of trans studies and the trans community in the United States. “A lively introduction to transgender history and activism in the U.S. Highly readable and highly recommended.” SUSAN —joanne meyerowitz, professor of history and american studies, yale University, and author of How Sex Changed: A History of Transsexuality In The United States “A powerful combination of lucid prose and theoretical sophistication . Readers STRYKER who have no or little knowledge of transgender issues will come away with the foundation they need, while those already in the field will find much to think about.” —paisley cUrrah, political
- 
												  Rethinking Responding to Raymond: Re-Replying to Reproaches of Transsexualism Evan Isaiah Spencer University of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeUniversity of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations August 2015 Rethinking Responding to Raymond: Re-replying to Reproaches of Transsexualism Evan Isaiah Spencer University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Spencer, Evan Isaiah, "Rethinking Responding to Raymond: Re-replying to Reproaches of Transsexualism" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 962. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/962 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RETHINKING RESPONDING TO RAYMOND: RE-REPLYING TO REPROACHES OF TRANSSEXUALISM by Evan Spencer A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee August 2015 ABSTRACT RETHINKING RESPONDING TO RAYMOND: RE-REPLYING TO REPROACHES OF TRANSSEXUALISM by Evan Spencer The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2015 Under the Supervision of Professor Andrea Westlund The topic of transsexualism was most prominently brought into the feminist movement's consciousness through the critical work of cultural radical feminist Janice Raymond. In this paper I will argue that the original response given by trans theorists to Raymond's critiques has allowed for the propagation of certain mistaken notions about trans people. In order to correct these misconceptions a different tack must be taken in responding to Raymond. I will begin by overviewing how two schools of feminist thought have lent themselves to theories of transsexualism, then focusing on radical feminist critique by Janice Raymond and a post-structural feminist response by theorist Sandy Stone.
- 
												  Defending Intimacy Against What? Limits of Antisurrogacy FeminismsThe University of Manchester Research Defending Intimacy against What? Limits of Antisurrogacy Feminisms DOI: 10.1086/692518 Document Version Final published version Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Lewis, S. (2017). Defending Intimacy against What? Limits of Antisurrogacy Feminisms. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 43(1), 97-125. [1]. https://doi.org/10.1086/692518 Published in: Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:27. Sep. 2021 Sophie Lewis Defending Intimacy against What? Limits of Antisurrogacy Feminisms t is now a simple fact that surrogacy is a booming, global business,” reads a memorandum posted under the heading “The Parentage/Surrogacy I 1 Project” at the Hague Conference on Private International Law. But the ambivalent term “parentage/surrogacy” implies a philosophical open- mindedness about the difference between the two terms that is reflected al- most nowhere else in public discourse.
- 
												  Prostitution and Public Policy. the Nordic ModelDignity: A Journal on Sexual Exploitation and Violence Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 3 January 2018 Prostitution and Public Policy. The orN dic Model Versus the Pimping of Prostitution Christopher A. Bagley Liverpool John Moores University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity Part of the Law Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Bagley, Christopher A. (2018) "Prostitution and Public Policy. The orN dic Model Versus the Pimping of Prostitution," Dignity: A Journal on Sexual Exploitation and Violence: Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 3. DOI: 10.23860/dignity.2018.03.01.03 Available at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity/vol3/iss1/3http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity/vol3/iss1/3 This Book Review Essay is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dignity: A Journal on Sexual Exploitation and Violence by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Prostitution and Public Policy. The orN dic Model Versus the Pimping of Prostitution Abstract In this review of recent books on public policy and prostitution, Julie Bindel’s The Pimping of Prostitution is sympathetically reviewed. Her thesis, that the libertarian movement seeking to remove prostitution from legal and public policy spheres has done grave harm to the lives of boys, girls and women, is elaborated by quotations from her chapters. This book is an important resource for those who campaign for the rights of women and children to be free of commercial sexual exploitation.
- 
												  Split at the Root: Prostitution and Feminist Discourses of Law ReformSplit at the Root: Prostitution and Feminist Discourses of Law Reform Margaret A. Baldwin My case is not unique. Violette Leduc' Today, adjustment to what is possible no longer means adjustment, it means making the possible real. Theodor Adorno2 This article originated in some years of feminist activism, and a sustained effort to understand two sentences spoken by Evelina Giobbe, an anti- prostitution activist and educator, at a radical feminist conference in 1987. She said: "Prostitution isn't like anything else. Rather, everything else is like prostitution because it is the model for women's condition."' Since that time, t Assistant Professor of Law, Florida State University College of Law. For my family: Mother Marge, Bob, Tim, John, Scharl, Marilynne, Jim, Robert, and in memory of my father, James. This article was supported by summer research grants from Florida State University College of Law. Otherwise, it is a woman-made product. Thanks to Rhoda Kibler, Mary LaFrance, Sheryl Walter, Annie McCombs, Dorothy Teer, Susan Mooney, Marybeth Carter, Susan Hunter, K.C. Reed, Margy Gast, and Christine Jones for the encouragement, confidence, and love. Evelina Giobbe, Kathleen Barry, K.C. Reed, Susan Hunter, and Toby Summer, whose contributions to work on prostitution have made mine possible, let me know I had something to say. The NCASA Basement Drafting Committee was a turning point. Catharine MacKinnon gave me the first opportunity to get something down on paper; she and Andrea Dworkin let me know the effort counted. Mimi Wilkinson and Stacey Dougan ably assisted in the research and in commenting on drafts.
- 
												  Notes De Lecture Numéro 45Cahiers du Genre, n° 45/2008 Notes de lecture Notes de lecture Jean Bobby Noble – Masculinities gence de la masculinité trans Without Men? Female Masculinity comme catégorie spécifique, plus in Twentieth-Century Fictions précisément de la manière dont (2004). Vancouver, University of British celle-ci devient intelligible et Columbia Press, 180 p. dicible. En se situant au croisement Si le corps n’est pas le fonde- des cultural studies, des gender ment ni l’élément stabilisateur de studies et des théories queer, dans l’identité de genre, comme le mon- la lignée de Judith Butler, Teresa de trent les théories queer, alors la Lauretis, Eve Kosovsky Sedgwick masculinité n’est pas l’apanage des mais aussi de Richard Dyer et corps mâles – voire, elle pourrait Michel Foucault, Noble mobilise bien en être parfois totalement dis- trois romans et un film mettant en sociée. Judith Halberstam avait scène des personnages en quête déjà investi cette réflexion avec d’identité et de reconnaissance : The Female Masculinity en 1998 Well of Loneliness de Radcliffe (Durham, Duke University Press), Hall (1928), Sacred Country de à travers l’analyse notamment de Rose Tremain (1992), Stone Butch The Well of Loneliness de Blues de Leslie Feinberg (1993), Radcliffe Hall. Jean Bobby Noble, et Boys Don’t Cry de Kimberly avec Masculinities Without Men?, Peirce (1999). Bien que tous ces réengage un examen critique de personnages entretiennent des rela- l’émergence et de la production tions amoureuses/sexuelles avec de female masculinities depuis le des femmes, leurs identités se dis- XIXe et tout au long du XXe tinguent d’une identité lesbienne, siècle, de manière plus radicale et constituant ‘autre chose’, un es- approfondie.
- 
												  TransfeminismsCáel M. Keegan—Sample syllabus (proposed) This is a proposed syllabus for an advanced WGSS seminar. Transfeminisms Course Overview:_________________________________________________ Description: Recent gains in visibility and recognition for transgender people have reactivated long- standing arguments over whether feminism can or should support trans rights, and whether transgender people should be considered feminist subjects. Rather than re- staging this decades-long debate as a zero-sum game, this course traces how—far from eradicating each other—“trans” and “feminist” share a co-constitutive history, each requiring and evolving the other. To quote Jack Halberstam from his talk "Why We Need a Transfeminism" at UC Santa Cruz in 2002, “Transgender is the gender trouble that feminism has been talking about all along.” We will explore the unfolding of the transfeminist imaginary from its roots in gay liberation and woman of color feminisms, through the sex wars of the 1970s and 80s, and into the 21st century. Throughout, we will examine a number of key points in feminist discourse and politics at which the paradoxical formation “transfeminism” becomes legible as a framework, necessity, legacy, or impending future. We will uncover transfeminist histories and grapple with the complexity of transfeminist communities, activisms, and relations. We will explore transfeminist world-building and practice our own transfeminist visions for the world. Required Text: Transgender Studies Quarterly, “Trans/Feminisms.” Eds. Susan Stryker and Talia Mae Bettcher. 3.1-2 (May 2016). The required text is available at the bookstore. All other readings are available via electronic reserve on Blackboard. Required Films: Films are on course reserve for viewing at the library.
- 
												  Transfeminine Disruptions of Feminist ProgressGeorgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Anthropology Theses Department of Anthropology 5-10-2019 Necrotic Machines/Zombie Genders: Transfeminine Disruptions of Feminist Progress Alexandra Chace Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/anthro_theses Recommended Citation Chace, Alexandra, "Necrotic Machines/Zombie Genders: Transfeminine Disruptions of Feminist Progress." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/anthro_theses/141 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Anthropology at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NECROTIC MACHINES/ZOMBIE GENDERS: TRANSFEMININE DISRUPTIONS OF FEMINIST PROGRESS by ALEXANDRA CHACE Under the Direction of Cassandra White, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Predominant narratives of trans womanhood—from biomedical sources, Feminist depictions, and film representations—typically present trans women as monstrous and antagonistic to normative cisgender society. Accordingly, this thesis traces this opposi- tional frame to the roots of ’trans’ as a cultural category, through 20th century biomedi- cal discourses, Feminist conceptions of trans woman identity, and horror films in order to better understand the contemporary proliferation of antipathy and violence towards transgender women. In so doing, this thesis revisits trans exclusionary theorists such as Mary Daly and Janice Raymond, developing Daly’s concept of ’robotitude’ into a notion of transitory ’necrosis’, positing the zombie as a moving post-human model for map- ping anti-trans violence and transphobia in regard to becoming-trans. This thesis further argues for trans identity not as a stable ontology, but as a hauntological trajectory of be- coming in which trans lives are rendered illegible and occluded.