2020 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL Scorecard

Home , Brian Deese, Carol Browner, Hip Hop Caucus

2020 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL scorecard

SECOND SESSION OF THE 116TH CONGRESS LCV BOARD OF DIRECTORS *

JOHN H. ADAMS, HONORARY STEVE HOLTZMAN SCOTT NATHAN Natural Resources Defense Council Boies Schiller Flexner LLP Center for American Progress BRENT BLACKWELDER, HONORARY RAMPA R. HORMEL, HONORARY BILL ROBERTS Friends of the Earth Enlyst Fund Corridor Partners THE HONORABLE SHERWOOD L. BOEHLERT, JOHN HUNTING, HONORARY LARRY ROCKEFELLER VICE CHAIR John Hunting & Associates American Conservation Association The Accord Group MICHAEL KIESCHNICK THEODORE ROOSEVELT IV, HONORARY THE HONORABLE CAROL BROWNER, CHAIR Green Advocacy Project CHAIR Former EPA Administrator Barclays Capital ROGER KIM CARRIE CLARK Democracy Alliance KERRY SCHUMANN North Carolina League of Conservation Wisconsin Conservation Voters MARK MAGAÑA Voters GreenLatinos LAURA TURNER SEYDEL BRIAN DEESE Turner Foundation WINSOME MCINTOSH, HONORARY BlackRock The McIntosh Foundation TRIP VAN NOPPEN THE HONORABLE DONNA F. EDWARDS Earthjustice MOLLY MCUSIC Former U.S. Representative Wyss Foundation KATHLEEN WELCH MICHAEL FOX Corridor Partners THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. MEADOWS III Eloise Capital The Wilderness Society ANTHA WILLIAMS ELAINE FRENCH Bloomberg Philanthropies GREG MOGA John and Elaine French Family Foundation Moga Investments LLC REVEREND LENNOX YEARWOOD, JR. MARIA HANDLEY Hip Hop Caucus REUBEN MUNGER Conservation Colorado Education Fund Vision Ridge Partners, LLC

LCV ISSUES & ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE *

BRENT BLACKWELDER SUNITA LEEDS REUBEN MUNGER Friends of the Earth Enfranchisement Foundation Vision Ridge Partners, LLC THE HONORABLE CAROL BROWNER MARK MAGAÑA KERRY SCHUMANN Former EPA Administrator GreenLatinos Wisconsin Conservation Voters MICHAEL FOX GREG MOGA TRIP VAN NOPPEN Eloise Capital Moga Investments LLC Earthjustice

LCV SCORECARD ADVISORY COMMITTEE *

CAROL ANDRESS CRAIG LASHER LUKAS ROSS Environmental Defense Fund Population Action International Friends of the Earth ALEXANDRA ADAMS MICHELLE MABSON ERIK SCHNEIDER Natural Resources Defense Council Black Millennials for Flint National Audubon Society BIDISHA BHATTACHARYYA DREW MCCONVILLE KERRY SCHUMANN, CHAIR Center for American Progress The Wilderness Society Wisconsin Conservation Voters KRISTEN BRENGEL KRISTEN MILLER KERENE TAYLOE National Parks Conservation Association Alaska Wilderness League WE ACT for Environmental Justice ROBERT COWIN KATIE MURTHA ABBY TINSLEY Union of Concerned Scientists Environment America National Wildlife Foundation ROBERT DEWEY ÁNGEL PEÑA KATHY TSANTIRIS Defenders of Wildlife GreenLatinos Ocean Conservancy JESSICA ECKDISH MELINDA PIERCE BlueGreen Alliance Sierra Club MARTY HAYDEN MICHELE ROBERTS Earthjustice Environmental Justice Health Alliance

* Organizations are shown for identification purposes only he nonprofit League of Conservation Voters (LCV) has CONTENTS published a National Environmental Scorecard every Congress since 1970, the year it was founded by leaders T of the environmental movement following the first 1. ANALYSIS Earth Day. LCV believes our earth is worth fighting for because everyone has a right to clean air, water, lands and a safe, Overview of the 2nd healthy community. Session of the 116th Congress 2 This edition of the National Environmental Scorecard provides objective, factual information about the most important Voting Summary 5 environmental legislation considered and the corresponding voting records of all members of the second session of the 116th Congress. This Scorecard represents the consensus of experts 2. SENATE SCORES from more than 20 respected environmental and conservation Vote Descriptions 8 organizations who selected the key votes on which members of Congress should be scored. LCV scores votes on the most Senate Votes 14 important issues of the year, including energy, climate change, public health, public lands and wildlife conservation, and spending for environmental programs. The votes included in this 3. HOUSE SCORES Scorecard presented members of Congress with a real choice and help distinguish which legislators are working for environmental Vote Descriptions 20 protection. Except in rare circumstances, the Scorecard excludes House Votes 28 consensus action on the environment and issues on which no recorded votes occurred.

Dedicated environmentalists and national leaders volunteered their time to identify and research crucial votes. We extend special thanks to our Board of Directors, Issues & Accountability Committee, and Scorecard Advisory Committee for their valuable input. 2020 OVERVIEW

2020 was a year like no other as our nation struggled with four interwoven crises: the coronavirus pandemic, economic inequality, racial injustice, and climate change.

These consequential crises shaped Congress’ Fortunately, Chair Kathy Castor (D-FL) and Demo- agenda and votes—relief and national leadership cratic members of the House Select Committee on in a time of vast hardship became overwhelmingly the Climate Crisis consulted experts and communi- urgent. Yet the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate ties all across the nation to devise a roadmap for approached their responses very differently; the climate action: “Solving the Climate Crisis: The Con- House proposed and passed multiple comprehen- gressional Action Plan for a Clean Energy Economy sive policy solutions while the Senate, in response and a Healthy, Resilient, and Just America.” The to these crises, remained largely inert, with only a House acted on some of the Select Committee’s few exceptions. recommendations, passing Supplemental Emer- gency Appropriations (H.R. 5687) for Puerto Rico, The 21 House votes in LCV’s 2020 National Environ- which, after three years of insufficient support, mental Scorecard advanced pro-environmental and is still rebuilding from Hurricane Maria and other pro-democracy bills, provisions, and government devastating hurricanes, and a climate-ambitious in- funding thanks to strong leadership from Speaker frastructure package, the Moving Forward Act, H.R. Pelosi and others. In stark contrast, of the 13 Senate 2, to help clean up our electricity and transporta- votes in the 2020 Scorecard, eight were extreme tion sectors, deliver clean drinking water to com- and partisan nominations both to the federal bench munities like Flint, MI, and make our country more and the Trump administration, and Leader McCon- resilient to the impacts of climate change. Though nell refused to bring to a vote much needed de- the Senate Democrat’s Special Committee on the mocracy reforms, climate, water infrastructure, and Climate Crisis also released their blueprint for cli- clean energy investments, and aid to people that mate action, the Republican-controlled Senate did the House passed. Across 2020, Leader McConnell not take up either bill, leaving communities with jammed through 44 lifetime judicial appointments damaged and failing infrastructure that continues for President Trump, while only holding votes on 25 to harm their health and wellbeing. bills or resolutions. The House’s multifaceted response to the climate The climate crisis continued unabated, harming crisis also included important clean energy legisla- people’s health, homes, farms, and other property, tion. The House passed an energy innovation pack- particularly in communities of color. We experi- age, H.R. 4447, that, as amended (vote #203), would enced the hottest year on record, the worst Atlantic greatly increase available funding levels for clean hurricane season on record, the worst West Coast energy programs to advance the transition to 100% fire season on record, a record 22 climate-fueled clean electricity and decarbonize the transporta- disasters that each caused over $1 billion in dam- tion and industrial sectors. The 116th Congress age, and total U.S. losses of $95 billion from cli- concluded on a high note with a year-end omnibus mate disasters. package (H.R. 133) signed into law that included

2 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV a phase down of climate super pollutants, HFCs; extensions of tax credits for energy efficiency and Scorecard Changes in wind and solar power; and increased clean energy 116th Congress research and innovation funding. Though many more ambitious climate actions are needed to As we announced last year, in order to bet- stave off the worst of the climate crisis, these year- ter align our Scorecard with our organizational focus on equity across gender, race, family and end actions provide momentum for a more com- health status, age, and physical ability and to prehensive suite of actions in 2021 and beyond. more accurately represent a member of Con- gress’s commitment to the environment, we are An extremely positive, and bipartisan, conserva- changing the way we score some missed votes. tion development in 2020 was the enactment Starting in the 2019 Scorecard, votes missed by of the Great American Outdoors Act (H.R. 1957), members of Congress due to family and medical which would provide full and permanent funding leave or disasters are being treated as excused absences and will not count against a member’s of $900 million annually for the Land and Water score. Votes missed for other reasons, including Conservation Fund as well as funding to address running for elected office, would still display as the deferred maintenance backlog in our national a missed vote and be counted the same as cast- parks and other public lands. The pandemic has ing an anti-environmental vote, as they have for underscored the health benefits of local parks and decades. Members may submit explanatory text other public lands and the need to make them to be included as footnotes. more plentiful and accessible for low wealth com- Also, since the 2019 Scorecard, we will display munities and communities of color. Investments in the votes of the five House Delegates represent- our public lands will also pay dividends in the fight ing American Samoa, District of Columbia, Guam, against climate change, as more lands are protect- Northern Mariana Islands, and U.S. Virgin Islands ed and restored to allow natural systems to absorb and the Resident Commissioner representing more climate pollution and improve resilience. Puerto Rico. At the start of the 116th Congress, Democrats, as they have every time they have

2020 was incalculably hard for so many people, been in the majority since 1993, reinstated voting on the floor by these members when the House and that hardship and loss from COVID-19 con- meets in the Committee of the Whole. Although tinues, especially in communities of color, where the more than 4 million residents of the federal longstanding structural and environmental racism district and these territories lack full voting rep- have made the health and economic impacts of resentation in Congress, we made this change as the pandemic worse. Soot from diesel trucks and part of our organizational focus on racial justice polluting industries located disproportionately in and equity and those communities of color bear- communities of color heightens the risk of catch- ing the brunt of climate change’s effects. In the past few years, major category 4+ hurricanes or ing and dying from the virus, and homes in these cyclones have struck all of the island territories, same communities are more likely to lack or be and the District of Columbia is also at risk from disconnected for lack of payment from essential extreme weather events and tidal flooding. We utilities like water and electric. These cumulative, hope that the presence in the Scorecard of these compounding impacts motivated our urgent calls representatives will remind readers of their to block Trump administration rollbacks of envi- need for greater representation and rights in ronmental health protections and enforcement, our democracy. fund environmental justice programs to reduce

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 3 pollution, and issue moratoria on utility shutoffs. participate equitably in our democracy, includ- In May, the House passed the Heroes Act, H.R. 6800, ing safely protesting, and we must look to 2021 for to provide these and other necessary relief provi- these necessary changes. sions, respond to the pandemic, and start to deliver more racial and environmental justice. After months In 2020, we not only faced crises, but amid these of inaction and refusing to negotiate, Senate Repub- crises, more people participated in our democracy— licans put forward an inadequate and dangerous casting their ballot in the 2020 elections—than ever relief package (inserted in S. 178) that failed on the before. The House passed legislation to help BIPOC floor for lack of support. participate more equitably in our democracy – for the first time advancing statehood for Washington, The House majority's leadership, with an average D.C. (H.R. 51) and supporting the U.S. Postal Service score of 100 percent, stands in stark contrast to the (USPS) (H.R. 8015), which played an outsized role failure of the Senate majority's leadership, with an in the smooth operation of the 2020 elections with average score of 8 percent, to respond to the pan- more than 65 million people voting by mail, or 40 demic and help families reeling from its economic percent of ballots cast, amidst the pandemic and devastation with the urgency and scale needed. And record turnout. Leader McConnell obstructed and the breakneck speed with which Leader McConnell delayed here as well, ignoring the lack of voting rep- rushed to confirm President Trump’s biased Supreme resentation for the more than 700,000 people living Court pick, Amy Coney Barrett, just days before the in the District of Columbia, primarily BIPOC, and de- 2020 election underscores his hypocritical power laying support for the USPS until after November’s grab and misguided focus on nominations to the det- election. There is great anticipation and potential riment of tens of millions of peoples’ health and liveli- during the 117th Congress to build upon 2020’s high hoods. One of the most damaging legacies of Trump’s water mark in the fight for equal representation for a presidency will be reshaping the federal judiciary majority BIPOC city of more than 700,000 residents. with his nomination, and the Senate’s confirmation, of more than 218 extreme and partisan candidates While 2020 was dominated by a global pandemic, for lifetime appointments. In particular, the Supreme the worst hurricane and wildfire seasons on record, Court wields immense power over the interpretation racially-targeted violence and police brutality, and of our bedrock environmental protections. both domestic and foreign government-sponsored voter suppression, it also included the defeat of As the pandemic laid bare the longstanding racial the most anti-environmental president ever. The inequities in our country, our nation witnessed the dichotomy of Speaker Pelosi’s leadership and ac- police killing of George Floyd, and protesters from tion to tackle crises facing our country and Leader across the nation demanded systemic policing McConnell’s complete disregard for the suffering of and criminal justice reforms. The same damaging people left much unfinished business to address the system—racism—is at the root of climate injustice, pandemic, environmental injustice, climate change, environmental injustice, and police brutality; these and racial injustice. With the added momentum of struggles are intertwined and must be addressed policies that have already passed the House, we together. For the first time, LCV is scoring votes on have high hopes for enacting transformative change removing public monuments to racism and polic- in 2021 as we begin a new year, and new Congress, ing and criminal justice reform. There is a dire need and a new administration with a pro-environment, for changes in policing and criminal justice for so pro-climate action trifecta in the White House, the many reasons, including so that Black, Indigenous, House, and the Senate. People of Color (BIPOC) can breathe freely and 4 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV VOTING SUMMARY

2020 STATE AND TERRITORY AVERAGES State/Territory SENATE HOUSE Alabama 35 15 Alaska 12 33 Arkansas 15 12 American Samoa N/A 0 Arizona 38 57 SENATE California 88 85 Colorado 46 59 Connecticut 88 100 Delaware 92 95 District of Columbia N/A 100 Florida 8 55 Georgia 8 39 Guam N/A 100 Hawaii 96 88 Idaho 0 12 Illinois 92 78 Indiana 8 31 Iowa 8 74 Kansas 8 25 Kentucky 15 24 Louisiana 0 21 Maine 62 98 Maryland 92 87 Massachusetts 69 99 Michigan 92 61 Minnesota 77 64 Mississippi 12 31 Missouri 8 31 house Montana 54 19 Nebraska 0 24 Nevada 88 80 New Hampshire 92 100 New Jersey 96 94 New Mexico 88 98 New York 100 86 North Carolina 15 30 North Dakota 15 0 Northern Mariana Islands N/A 100 Ohio 54 38 Oklahoma 0 23 Oregon 92 81 AS MP Pennsylvania 50 59 DC PR

Puerto Rico N/A 0 GU VI Rhode Island 100 100 South Carolina 12 31 South Dakota 4 10 Tennessee 8 30 Texas 4 41 Utah 0 26 Vermont 77 100 Virgin Islands N/A 100 Virginia 92 66 Washington 84 76 West Virginia 35 19 Wisconsin 46 42 Wyoming 0 5

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 5 2020 HIGH AND LOW SCORES

HIGHEST LOWEST SENATE DELEGATIONS DELEGATIONS New York 100% Delaware 92% New Hampshire 92% Idaho 0% Oklahoma 0% South Dakota 4% Rhode Island 100% Illinois 92% Oregon 92% Louisiana 0% Utah 0% Texas 4% Hawaii 96% Maryland 92% Virginia 92% Nebraska 0% Wyoming 0% New Jersey 96% Michigan 92% SENATE SCORES OF 0

SENATE SCORES OF 100 ALABAMA Shelby MISSOURI Hawley TEXAS Cruz

HAWAII Schatz NEW YORK Gillibrand · RHODE ISLAND Reed · FLORIDA Scott NEBRASKA Fischer · UTAH Lee, M · Romney Schumer Whitehouse Sasse NEW JERSEY Booker IDAHO Crapo · Risch WISCONSIN Johnson, R OKLAHOMA Inhofe · INDIANA Braun WYOMING Barrasso Lankford · Enzi KANSAS Moran SOUTH DAKOTA Rounds LOUISIANA Cassidy · TENNESSEE Blackburn Kennedy, J.

HIGHEST LOWEST house DELEGATIONS DELEGATIONS

Connecticut 100% New Hampshire 100% Vermont 100% Maine 98% American South Dakota Samoa 0% 10% District of Columbia Northern Mariana Virgin Islands 100% New Mexico 98% 100% Islands 100% North Dakota Arkansas 12% Massachusetts 99% 0% Guam 100% Rhode Island 100% Idaho 12% Puerto Rico 0% Alabama 15% Wyoming 5% HOUSE SCORES 95 and Over (green indicates 100)

ARIZONA O’Halleran · GEORGIA Bishop, S · MINNESOTA Craig · Phillips PENNSYLVANIA Boyle · Grijalva · Gallego · Stanton Johnson, H · Lewis, J · · McCollum · Omar Evans · Dean · Scanlon HOUSE SCORES OF 0 McBath · Scott, D · Houlahan · Wild · CALIFORNIA Huffman · MISSISSIPPI Thompson, B Cartwright · Lamb · Doyle ALABAMA Byrne · Brooks, M · Palmer Garamendi · Thompson, M GUAM San Nicolas MISSOURI Clay · Matsui · Bera · McNerney · RHODE ISLAND Cicilline · AMERICAN SAMOA Radewagen HAWAII Case NEVADA Titus · Lee, S · Langevin Harder · DeSaulnier · Lee, B ARIZONA Biggs · Lesko · Speier, J · Swalwell · Costa ILLINOIS Rush · Kelly, R · Horsford SOUTH CAROLINA Clyburn García · Quigley · Casten · CALIFORNIA McClintock · Hunter · Khanna · Eshoo · Panetta · NEW HAMPSHIRE Pappas Davis, D · Krishnamoorthi TENNESSEE Cooper · Carbajal · Brownley · Chu · · Kuster COLORADO Buck Schiff · Cárdenas · Sherman · Schakowsky · Schneider Cohen · Foster · Underwood · NEW JERSEY Norcross · FLORIDA Yoho · Steube · Aguilar · Napolitano · Lieu TEXAS Fletcher · Green, Bustos Kim · Gottheimer · Pallone · · Gomez · Torres · Ruiz · A · Gonzalez · Escobar GEORGIA Hice · Loudermilk · Allen Malinowski · Sires · Pascrell Bass · Sánchez · Cisneros INDIANA Visclosky · Carson · Jackson Lee · Castro · · Sherrill · Watson Coleman KANSAS Estes · Roybal-Allard · Takano · Garcia · Johnson, E · Allred · IOWA Finkenauer · Waters · Barragán · Porter · NEW MEXICO Haaland · Veasey · Vela · Doggett KENTUCKY Massie Loebsack · Axne Correa · Lowenthal · Rouda Torres Small · Luján VERMONT Welch LOUISIANA Johnson, M · Levin, M · Vargas · Peters, KENTUCKY Yarmuth NEW YORK Suozzi · Meeks S · Davis, S VIRGIN ISLANDS Plaskett MARYLAND Harris, A LOUISIANA Richmond · Meng · Velázquez · Jeffries COLORADO DeGette · · Clarke, Y · Nadler · Rose VIRGINIA Luria · Scott, R · NORTH CAROLINA Bishop Neguse · Crow · Perlmutter MAINE Pingree · Golden · Maloney, C · Espaillat McEachin · Spanberger · NORTH DAKOTA Armstrong CONNECTICUT Larson, J · MARYLAND Ruppersberger · Ocasio-Cortez · Engel Beyer · Wexton · Connolly · Sarbanes · Brown, A · · Lowey · Maloney, S · OKLAHOMA Hern Courtney · DeLauro · Himes WASHINGTON DelBene · Hoyer · Trone · Mfume · Delgado · Tonko · Brindisi · · Hayes Larsen · Kilmer · Jayapal · PUERTO RICO González-Colón, J. Raskin Higgins DELAWARE Blunt Schrier · Smith · Heck SOUTH CAROLINA Norman MASSACHUSETTS Neal NORTH CAROLINA Rochester WISCONSIN Pocan · Moore · McGovern · Trahan · Butterfield · Price · Adams TEXAS Gooden · Wright · Conaway · DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Kennedy, J · Clark, K · Weber · Arrington · Roy · Marchant · NORTHERN MARIANA Norton Moulton · Pressley · Lynch Cloud · Babin ISLANDS Sablan FLORIDA Lawson · Murphy · Keating VIRGINIA Cline · Soto · Demings · Crist · OHIO Beatty · Ryan MICHIGAN Kildee · Slotkin · WISCONSIN Tiffany Castor · Hastings · Frankel Levin, A · Stevens · Dingell · OREGON Bonamici · · Deutch · Wasserman Tlaib · Lawrence Blumenauer · DeFazio Schultz · Wilson, F · Mucarsel-Powell · Shalala

6 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV RATING THE LEADERSHIP OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEES SENATE COMMITTEE CHAIR SCORE RANKING MEMBER SCORE Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Roberts (KS) 15 Stabenow (MI) 92 Appropriations Shelby (AL) 0 Leahy (VT) 92 Commerce, Science, and Transportation Wicker (MS) 15 Cantwell (WA) 92 Energy and Natural Resources Murkowski (AK) 15 Manchin (WV) 54 Environment and Public Works Barrasso (WY) 0 Carper (DE) 92 SENATE COMMITTEE LEADER AVERAGE CHAIRS 9 RANKING MEMBERS 84 HOUSE COMMITTEE CHAIR SCORE RANKING MEMBER SCORE Agriculture Peterson (MN-07) 76 Conaway (TX-11) 0 Appropriations Lowey (NY-17) 100 Granger (TX-12) 14 Energy and Commerce Pallone (NJ-06) 100 Walden (OR-02) 19 Natural Resources Grijalva (AZ-03) 100 Bishop, R. (UT-01) 10 Science, Space, and Technology Johnson, E.B. (TX-30) 95 Lucas (OK-03) 10 Transportation and Infrastructure DeFazio (OR-04) 100 Graves, S. (MO-06) 14 Select Committee on the Climate Crisis Castor (FL-14) 100 Graves, G. (LA-06) 5 HOUSE COMMITTEE LEADER AVERAGE CHAIRS 96 RANKING MEMBERS 10

party leaders' scores SENATE DEMOCRATS SCORE REPUBLICANS SCORE Schumer (NY), Minority Leader 100 McConnell (KY), Majority Leader 23 Durbin (IL), Minority Whip 92 Cornyn (TX), Assistant Republican Leader 7.7 Murray (WA), Assistant Democratic Leader 77 Thune (SD), Conference Chair 7.7 Stabenow (MI), Chairwoman of Policy and Communications Committee 92 Blunt (MO), Conference Vice Chair 15 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 90 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 13 HOUSE DEMOCRATS SCORE REPUBLICANS SCORE Pelosi (CA-12), Speaker of the House* N/A Hoyer (MD-05), Majority Leader 100 McCarthy, Kevin (CA-23), Minority Leader 14 Clyburn (SC-06), Majority Whip 100 Scalise, Steve (LA-01), Minority Whip 14 Lujan, B.R. (NM-03), 100 Cheney (WY-AL), Conference Chairman 5 Jeffries (NY-08), Caucus Chairman 100 Palmer (AL-06), Policy Committee Chairman 0 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 100 LEADERSHIP AVERAGE 8

*The Speaker of the House votes at her discretion.

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 7 2020 SENATE VOTE DESCRIPTIONS

1. USMCA TRADE DEAL House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) sponsored H.R. 5430, the United States-Mexico- Canada Agreement Implementation Act (USMCA), which ratified President Trump’s trade deal that failed to even mention, let alone take action on, the climate crisis. The deal threatens our climate and communities by continuing to support fossil fuel development, including dirty tar sands oil and fracked natural gas, and allowing oil and gas companies in Mexico to challenge environmental and climate regulations through the Investor-State Dispute Settlement system, all while failing to recommit the U.S. to the Paris Climate Agreement. Additionally, the deal fell far short on what is necessary to significantly strengthen enforcement mechanisms, protect against illegal flora and fauna trade, or address outsourcing and dumping of toxic pollution into air and water. Ultimately, the final agreement helps corporate polluters and wasted a critical opportunity to address the climate crisis and environmental issues created by international trade. On January 16, the Senate approved H.R. 5430 by a vote of 89-10 (Senate roll call vote 14). NO IS THE PRO- ENVIRONMENT VOTE. President Trump signed the USMCA into law on January 29.

2. BRASHER CONFIRMATION (ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS) The Senate considered President Trump’s nomination of Andrew Brasher to be U.S. Circuit Court judge for the Eleventh Circuit. Circuit courts are often the ultimate arbiters of highly significant cases, including those involving environmental protections, and it is critical that the judges confirmed to serve lifetime appointments on these courts are qualified, non-partisan, and committed to treating parties fairly. As Alabama Solicitor General, Brasher repeatedly attacked fundamental environmental protections and promoted restrictions on voting rights, falsely arguing that the racist voter suppression efforts have “faded away.” On February 11, the Senate confirmed Brasher to the Eleventh Circuit by a vote of 52-43 (Senate roll call vote 36). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

3. KINDRED CONFIRMATION (U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA) The Senate considered President Trump’s nomination of Joshua Kindred to be U.S. District Court judge for the District of Alaska. It is critical that the judges confirmed to serve lifetime appointments on our federal courts are qualified, non-partisan, and committed to treating parties fairly. As counsel to the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, a lobbying institution primarily advocating for international fossil fuel corporations, Kindred spent much of his career fighting for the expansion of drilling projects across Alaska and repeatedly argued against protections for Alaska’s air, water, lands, and wildlife. Kindred’s willingness to disregard scientific evidence to promote fossil fuel production calls into question his ability to fairly consider facts as a federal judge. On February 12, the Senate confirmed Kindred to the District of Alaska by a vote of 54-41 (Senate roll call vote 41). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

4. MACGREGOR CONFIRMATION (INTERIOR DEPUTY SECRETARY) The Senate considered President Trump’s nomination of Katharine MacGregor to serve as deputy secretary of the Interior. MacGregor has a long track record espousing views and taking actions against land and ocean conservation and in favor of extractive industries. Since 2017, she has occupied senior roles at the Department of the Interior and oversaw the implementation of the

8 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV administration’s “energy dominance” agenda that encompassed unprecedented rollbacks of public lands protections, such as eliminating over two million acres of national monument protections; opening tens of millions of acres of Sage Grouse habitat to development; and efforts to lift protections in the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans against new drilling. On February 25, the Senate confirmed MacGregor to be deputy secretary of the Interior by a vote of 58-38 (Senate roll call vote 60). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

5. DANLY CONFIRMATION (FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION) The Senate considered President Trump’s nomination of James P. Danly to serve as a member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which regulates and oversees energy industries in the United States. Not only is Danly underqualified for the position, his nomination also set a dangerous precedent by politicizing the traditionally independent and objective agency. Typically, FERC commissioners are advanced in pairs, but by confirming Danly without a Democratic counterpart, this vote threw out decades of precedent, creating legal uncertainty around FERC decisions and jeopardizing the agency’s ability to work on behalf of what is best for consumers, the climate, and our environment. On March 12, the Senate confirmed Danly to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by a vote of 52-40 (Senate roll call vote 72). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

6. DEFEATING EFFORT TO DERAIL THE GREAT AMERICAN OUTDOORS ACT During consideration of the Great American Outdoors Act (GAOA), Senator Mike Enzi (R-WY) raised a “budget point of order” to this legislation, which was a procedural tactic that, if success- ful, would have killed the bill and denied funding for critical conservation investments contained in the underlying legislation. GAOA provides full and permanent funding of $900 million annually for the Land and Water Conservation Fund and funding to address the deferred maintenance backlog in our national parks and other public lands. By investing in our public lands and waters, GAOA will protect our nation’s natural heritage and invaluable landscapes, enhance access to the outdoors and green spaces for communities nationwide, and provide much-needed repairs to deteriorating infrastructure in our national parks. With guaranteed funding into the future, GAOA honors existing federal commitments to conserve and maintain these irreplaceable public treasures. On June 15, the Senate approved a motion waiving the budget point of order on H.R. 1957, the vehicle for GAOA, by a vote of 68-30 (Senate roll call vote 118). YES IS THE PRO-ENVI- RONMENT VOTE. The Senate approved H.R. 1957 on June 17, the House approved it on July 22, and the president signed this legislation into law on August 4.

7. GREAT AMERICAN OUTDOORS ACT Senator Cory Gardner (R-CO) sponsored the Great American Outdoors Act (GAOA), which provides full and permanent funding of $900 million annually for the Land and Water Conserva- tion Fund and funding to address the deferred maintenance backlog in our national parks and other public lands. By investing in our public lands and waters, GAOA will protect our nation’s natural heritage and invaluable landscapes, enhance access to the outdoors and green spaces for communities nationwide, and provide much-needed repairs to deteriorating infrastructure in our national parks. With guaranteed funding into the future, GAOA honors existing federal commit-

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 9 ments to conserve and maintain these irreplaceable public treasures. On June 17, the Senate approved H.R. 1957, the vehicle for GAOA, by a vote of 73-25 (Senate roll call vote 121). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House approved H.R. 1957 on July 22 and the president signed this legislation into law on August 4.

8. WALKER CONFIRMATION (D.C. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS) The Senate considered President Trump’s nomination of Justin Walker to be U.S. Circuit Court judge for the D.C. Circuit. Circuit courts are often the ultimate arbiters of highly significant cases, including those involving environmental protections, and it is critical that the judges confirmed to serve lifetime appointments on these courts are qualified, non-partisan, and committed to treating parties fairly. Walker, a hyper-partisan who lacks the temperament or experience to serve fairly as a judge, was selected for his connections and willingness to fulfill partisan political goals on the bench. A former intern of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) who appeared on Fox News dozens of times in defense of Justice Kavanaugh and the president, Walker lacked sufficient experience or credibility to serve on one of the most powerful federal courts in our country. On June 18, the Senate confirmed Walker to the D.C. Circuit by a vote of 51-42 (Senate roll call vote 123). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

9. WILSON CONFIRMATION (FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS) The Senate considered President Trump’s nomination of Cory Wilson to be U.S. Circuit Court judge for the Fifth Circuit. Circuit courts are often the ultimate arbiters of highly significant cases, including those involving environmental protections, and it is critical that the judges confirmed to serve lifetime appointments on these courts are qualified, non-partisan, and committed to treating parties fairly. Wilson has made repeated and untrue attacks against voting access, an especially problematic record given his home state of Mississippi’s history of racist voter suppression and intimidation. Additionally, Wilson’s repeated and partisan attacks against President Obama, progressive policies and those who support them reflect a lack of judicial temperament. On June 24, the Senate confirmed Wilson to the Fifth Circuit by a vote of 52-48 (Senate roll call vote 125). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

10. INADEQUATE POLICING REFORM Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) sponsored S. 3985, the JUSTICE Act, which would inadequately address the need for comprehensive policing reform. Black people have endured systemic racism and abusive policing practices for generations, but the mere incremental reforms and increased police funding of S. 3985 fail to address the priorities of racial justice organizations. Despite the outcry from racial justice organizations and activists following the deaths of George Floyd, Bre- onna Taylor, Jacob Blake and many others, S. 3985 fails to address racial profiling, no-knock war- rants, militarization equipment, or restrictions on use of force such as chokeholds. Environmental justice requires racial and social justice, and an effort to pass a legislative half-measure instead of meaningful change is unacceptable. On June 24, the motion to invoke cloture was rejected by a vote of 55-45 (60 votes were needed to pass the motion; Senate roll call vote 126) and the proposal did not move forward. NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

10 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 11. INADEQUATE COVID RELIEF PACKAGE Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) attempted a vote on a bare-bones COVID-19 relief package instead of taking up a bill that met the needs of the country. In the midst of a raging pandemic that was causing disproportionate suffering in communities of color and Trump’s ap- pointee as Postmaster General attempting to sway the upcoming election by delaying the delivery of mail-in ballots, the proposal would provide little funding for testing or public health response and merely provide loan forgiveness for the U.S. Postal Service and only if the agency got into even more dire financial straits. Unfortunately, it also would let companies off the hook for actions that endanger their employees, customers, and broader community. Among other failings, this inadequate bill would not have provided critical relief in the form of additional funding for state and local governments, vote-by-mail and election assistance to ensure smooth operation of our democracy, or a moratorium on utility disconnects at a time when it is even more essential for homes to have clean water for hand washing and heat and cooling, since community warm- ing or cooling centers would defeat social distancing efforts. And it would provide unrelated and unnecessary support to extractive industries and coal companies. Environmental justice requires addressing the gross inequities and disproportionate impacts of the COVID-19 crisis, and liabil- ity-erasing legislative half-measures are unacceptable. On September 10, the motion to invoke cloture was rejected by a vote of 52-47 (60 votes were needed to pass the motion; Senate roll call vote 168) and the proposal did not move forward. NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

12. BARRETT CLOTURE VOTE (SUPREME COURT) The Senate considered President Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court holds immense power to protect our right to breathe clean air, drink clean water, and participate equitably in our democracy. Justices on the court have an impact lasting generations, and it is essential that they respect precedent, interpret the law in a fair and well-reasoned manner, and act as an independent check on the president. Barrett’s record reflects a philosophy that will make it harder for those suffering environmental harms to get their day in court, and for federal agencies to issue critical public protections. As an appeals court judge, Barrett repeatedly applied a narrow view of the public’s right to access the courts, her academic writings suggest a willingness to undermine critical environmental protections, and during her confirmation hearing she was repeatedly unwilling to acknowledge the science of climate change. In addition to her environmental record, the flawed nomination process further delayed CO- VID-19 relief, and was a blatant and hypocritical power grab by the same congressional leaders who refused a hearing for Judge Garland’s nomination to the Court. On October 25, the Senate invoked cloture on Barrett’s nomination by a vote of 51-48 (Senate roll call vote 222). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 11 13. BARRETT CONFIRMATION (SUPREME COURT) The Senate considered President Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court holds immense power to protect our right to breathe clean air, drink clean water, and participate equitably in our democracy. Justices on the court have an impact lasting generations, and it is essential that they respect precedent, interpret the law in a fair and well-reasoned manner, and act as an independent check on the president. Barrett’s record reflects a philosophy that will make it harder for those suffering environmental harms to get their day in court, and for federal agencies to issue critical public protections. As an appeals court judge, Barrett repeatedly applied a narrow view of the public’s right to access the courts, her academic writings suggest a willingness to undermine critical environmental protections, and during her confirmation hearing she was repeatedly unwilling to acknowledge the science of climate change. In addition to her environmental record, the flawed nomination process further delayed CO- VID-19 relief, and was a blatant and hypocritical power grab by the same congressional leaders who refused a hearing for Judge Garland’s nomination to the Court. On October 26, the Senate approved Barrett’s nomination by a vote of 52-48 (Senate roll call vote 224). NO IS THE PRO- ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

12 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 13 SENATE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES % = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote ? = Absence (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#36

#125

Brasher Confirmation (Eleventh Circuit Court Kindred Confirmation (U.S. District Court for MacGregor Confirmation (Interior Deputy Defeating Effort to Derail the Great American Walker Confirmation (D.C. Circuit Court of Wilson Confirmation (Fifth Circuit Court of 2020 116th Congress Lifetime USMCA Trade Deal #14 Danly Confirmation (FERC Member) #72 Great American Outdoors Act #121 Inadequate Policing Reform #126 Inadequate COVID Relief Package #168 Barrett ClotureVote (Supreme Court) #222 Barrett Confirmation (Supreme Court) #224 of Appeals) the District of Alaska) #41 Secretary) #60 Outdoors Act #118 Appeals) #123 Appeals)

ALABAMA

Jones D 69 78 82 ✖ % % ? ✖ % % % % ✖ % % %

Shelby R 0 15 13 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ALASKA

Murkowski R 15 26 18 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖

Sullivan R 8 11 8 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ARIZONA

McSally R 15 15 7 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Sinema D 62 67 77 ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ? % % % % % ARKANSAS

Boozman R 15 19 7 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Cotton R 15 15 3 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ CALIFORNIA

Feinstein D 92 96 90 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Harris, K.* D 85 78 91 % % % % % % % % % % ? ? % COLORADO

Bennet** D 77 81 89 ✖ ? ? % % % % % % % % % %

Gardner R 15 26 11 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ CONNECTICUT

Blumenthal D 92 96 98 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Murphy, C. D 85 93 97 ✖ % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % DELAWARE

Carper D 92 96 84 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Coons D 92 96 94 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

* Senator Harris missed a number of votes while campaigning for U.S. vice-president. ** Senator Bennet missed a number of votes while campaigning for U.S. president.

14 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV SENATE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES % = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote ? = Absence (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#36

#125

Brasher Confirmation (Eleventh Circuit Court Kindred Confirmation (U.S. District Court for MacGregor Confirmation (Interior Deputy Defeating Effort to Derail the Great American Walker Confirmation (D.C. Circuit Court of Wilson Confirmation (Fifth Circuit Court of 2020 116th Congress Lifetime USMCA Trade Deal #14 Danly Confirmation (FERC Member) #7 Great American Outdoors Act #121 Inadequate Policing Reform #126 Inadequate COVID Relief Package #168 Barrett ClotureVote (Supreme Court) #222 Barrett Confirmation (Supreme Court) #224 of Appeals) the District of Alaska) #41 Secretary) #60 Outdoors Act #118 Appeals) #123 Appeals)

FLORIDA

Rubio R 15 11 5 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Scott R 0 4 7 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ GEORGIA

Loeffler R 8 N/A 8 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Perdue R 8 11 3 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ HAWAII

Hirono D 92 96 95 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Schatz D 100 100 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % IDAHO

Crapo R 0 4 6 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Risch R 0 4 7 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ILLINOIS

Duckworth D 92 96 90 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Durbin D 92 96 88 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % INDIANA

Braun R 0 4 7 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Young, T. R 15 22 5 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ IOWA

Ernst R 8 11 3 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Grassley R 8 7 18 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ KANSAS

Moran R 15 7 8 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Roberts R 15 22 9 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 15 SENATE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES % = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote ? = Absence (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#36

#125

KENTUCKY

McConnell R 23 19 7 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖

Paul R 8 4 8 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ LOUISIANA

Cassidy R 0 4 7 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Kennedy, John R 0 4 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ MAINE

Collins R 46 56 61 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % % % ✖ ✖ % %

King, A. I 77 85 91 ✖ % % ✖ % % % % % ✖ % % % MARYLAND

Cardin D 92 96 92 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Van Hollen D 92 96 98 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % MASSACHUSETTS

Markey D 77 89 94 % % % % % ? ? ? % % % % %

Warren* D 62 70 96 ✖ ? ? ? ? % % % % % % % % MICHIGAN

Peters, G. D 92 96 93 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Stabenow D 92 96 89 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % MINNESOTA

Klobuchar** D 62 70 94 ✖ ? ? ? ? % % % % % % % %

Smith D 92 96 100 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % MISSISSIPPI

Hyde✖-Smith R 8 19 19 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Wicker R 15 11 5 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

* Senator Warren missed a number of votes while campaigning for U.S. president. ** Senator Klobuchar missed a number of votes while campaigning for U.S. president.

16 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV SENATE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES % = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote ? = Absence (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#36

#125

Brasher Confirmation (Eleventh Circuit Court Kindred Confirmation (U.S. District Court for MacGregor Confirmation (Interior Deputy Defeating Effort to Derail the Great American Walker Confirmation (D.C. Circuit Court of Wilson Confirmation (Fifth Circuit Court of 2020 116th Congress Lifetime USMCA Trade Deal #14 Danly Confirmation (FERC Member) #7 Great American Outdoors Act #121 Inadequate Policing Reform #126 Inadequate COVID Relief Package #168 Barrett ClotureVote (Supreme Court) #222 Barrett Confirmation (Supreme Court) #224 of Appeals) the District of Alaska) #41 Secretary) #60 Outdoors Act #118 Appeals) #123 Appeals)

MISSOURI

Blunt R 15 19 6 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Hawley R 0 4 7 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ MONTANA

Daines R 15 22 6 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Tester D 92 96 88 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % NEBRASKA

Fischer R 0 4 6 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Sasse R 0 0 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ NEVADA

Cortez Masto D 92 96 96 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Rosen D 85 92 96 ✖ % % % % % % ? % % % % % NEW HAMPSHIRE

Hassan D 92 96 100 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Shaheen D 92 96 96 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % NEW JERSEY

Booker D 100 74 91 % % % % % % % % % % % % %

Menendez D 92 96 95 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % NEW MEXICO

Heinrich D 85 89 94 ✖ % % ✖ % % % % % % % % %

Udall D 92 96 96 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % NEW YORK

Gillibrand D 100 96 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % %

Schumer D 100 100 92 % % % % % % % % % % % % %

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 17 SENATE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES % = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote ? = Absence (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#36

#125

NORTH CAROLINA

Burr R 15 22 9 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Tillis R 15 19 9 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ NORTH DAKOTA

Cramer R 15 15 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Hoeven R 15 15 8 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ OHIO

Brown, S. D 92 96 94 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Portman R 15 22 20 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ OKLAHOMA

Inhofe R 0 0 5 ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Lankford R 0 0 5 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ OREGON

Merkley D 92 96 99 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Wyden D 92 96 91 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % PENNSYLVANIA

Casey D 92 96 93 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Toomey R 8 4 5 % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ RHODE ISLAND

Reed, J. D 100 100 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % %

Whitehouse D 100 93 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % SOUTH CAROLINA

Graham, L. R 15 22 13 ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Scott, T. R 8 11 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ SOUTH DAKOTA

Rounds R 0 11 6 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Thune R 8 11 11 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

18 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV SENATE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES % = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action i = Ineligible to vote ? = Absence (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#36

#125

Brasher Confirmation (Eleventh Circuit Court Kindred Confirmation (U.S. District Court for MacGregor Confirmation (Interior Deputy Defeating Effort to Derail the Great American Walker Confirmation (D.C. Circuit Court of Wilson Confirmation (Fifth Circuit Court of 2020 116th Congress Lifetime USMCA Trade Deal #14 Danly Confirmation (FERC Member) #7 Great American Outdoors Act #121 Inadequate Policing Reform #126 Inadequate COVID Relief Package #168 Barrett ClotureVote (Supreme Court) #222 Barrett Confirmation (Supreme Court) #224 of Appeals) the District of Alaska) #41 Secretary) #60 Outdoors Act #118 Appeals) #123 Appeals)

TENNESSEE

Alexander R 15 26 21 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Blackburn R 0 11 3 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ TEXAS

Cornyn R 8 7 5 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Cruz R 0 0 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ UTAH

Lee, M. R 0 0 7 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Romney R 0 7 14 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ VERMONT

Leahy D 92 96 94 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Sanders* I 62 65 91 % ? ? ? ? % % ? % % % % % VIRGINIA

Kaine D 92 96 95 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Warner D 92 96 88 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % WASHINGTON

Cantwell** D 92 96 93 ✖ % % % E % % % % % % % %

Murray D 77 85 91 ✖ % % % % % ? ? % % % % % WEST VIRGINIA

Capito R 15 22 17 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Manchin D 54 70 49 ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ? % ✖ % % % WISCONSIN

Baldwin D 92 96 97 ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % %

Johnson, R. R 0 0 3 ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ WYOMING

Barrasso R 0 4 8 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

Enzi R 0 4 5 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

* Senator Sanders missed a number of votes while campaigning for U.S. president. ** Senator Cantwell was absent for roll call vote 72 due to adhering to COVID-19 protocol established by the Capitol Physician.

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 19 2020 HOUSE VOTE DESCRIPTIONS

1. CLOSING THE PFAS CLEAN WATER LOOPHOLE Representative Chris Pappas (D-NH) sponsored an amendment to H.R. 535, the PFAS Action Act of 2019, which would close the loophole in the Clean Water Act that currently allows companies to discharge unlimited amounts of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) into waterways. Also called “forever chemicals” in recognition of their persistence in the environment and our bodies, PFAS are used in many consumer products and industrial applications but have been linked to numerous health problems like certain cancers, thyroid disease, neurological development issues, and more. The Pappas amendment would require the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to review ongoing PFAS discharges and establish clear treatment limits in order to protect the health of our families and environment. Additionally, it would create a grant program authorized at $100 million annually to help municipal sewage treatment plants control PFAS discharges. On January 10, the House approved the Pappas amendment by a vote of 242-168 (House roll call vote 11). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 535, with the Pappas amendment, on January 10, but the Senate took no action on this legislation.

2. PROTECTING PEOPLE FROM PFAS POLLUTION Representative Debbie Dingell (D-MI) sponsored H.R. 535, the PFAS Action Act of 2019, which would take important steps in addressing the growing national PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) crisis that is threatening the health of millions of people across the country. Also called “forever chemicals” in recognition of their persistence in the environment and our bodies, PFAS are used in many consumer products and industrial applications but have been linked to numerous health problems like certain cancers, thyroid disease, neurological development issues, and more. H.R. 535 would require the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set a drinking water standard for PFAS within two years, regulate certain PFAS through the Clean Air Act, require drinking water monitoring for PFAS, increase transparency through the Toxics Release Inventory, and provide funding for water treatment. Additionally, it would provide consumers with knowledge of products containing PFAS by adding PFAS to the EPA’s Safer Choice Program. On January 10, the House approved H.R. 535 by a vote of 247-159 (House roll call vote 13). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

3. GREAT LAKES RESTORATION INITIATIVE Representatives David Joyce (R-OH) and Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) sponsored H.R. 4031, the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Act of 2019, which reauthorized the Great Lakes Restoration Initia- tive through fiscal year 2026 and increases funding to $475 million by 2026. Since 2010, the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative has been critical in helping to clean up the Great Lakes by reducing pollution like phosphorus that contributes to harmful algal blooms, keeping out invasive species like Asian carp, restoring the coastline, and preventing future contamination. On February 5, the House approved H.R. 4031 by a vote of 373-45 (House roll call vote 36). YES IS THE PRO- ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate approved H.R. 4031 by unanimous consent on December 20 and President Trump signed it into law on January 5, 2021.

20 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 4. PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF WORKERS TO ORGANIZE Chair Robert Scott (D-VA) sponsored H.R. 2474, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019. This bill would empower employees by strengthening workers’ rights to collectively bargain for higher wages, safer working conditions and better benefits.As we transition to a clean energy economy, protecting workers’ rights to organize would help ensure that the jobs created are good, family-sustaining jobs that address economic inequality. Additionally, unionized workers are better equipped to handle potentially hazardous workplace situations and have more support and protection to blow the whistle in dangerous situations. This can avert industrial ac- cidents and result in safer communities, as well as cleaner air and water. On February 6, the House approved H.R. 2474 by a vote of 224-194 (House roll call vote 50). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

5. EMERGENCY AND CLIMATE DISASTER AID FOR PUERTO RICO Chair Nita Lowey (D-NY) sponsored H.R. 5687, the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Relief and Puerto Rico Disaster Tax Relief Act, 2020. This bill would provide much needed funding to Puerto Rico to recover and rebuild from a series of destructive earthquakes and hurricanes, which were made more damaging by climate change. More than two years later, families in Puerto Rico are still suffering from the severe damage done to their communities by Hurricane Maria, when the massive storm destroyed almost all of the electric utility infrastructure. Adequate funding is also necessary to make infrastructure more resilient to the more fre- quent and damaging climate change-fueled hurricanes. On February 7, the House approved H.R. 5687 by a vote of 237-161 (House roll call vote 54). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

6. PROTECTING WILDERNESS ACROSS THE WEST Representative Diana DeGette (D-CO) sponsored H.R. 2546, the Protecting America’s Wilder- ness (PAW) Act, which would permanently protect 1.37 million acres of public lands and waters across California, Colorado, and Washington. The PAW Act, an ambitious public lands package, combined six bills: H.R. 2546, the Colorado Wilderness Act; H.R. 2250, the Northwest California Wilderness, Recreation and Working Forests Act; H.R. 2199, the Central Coast Heritage Protec- tion Act; H.R. 2215, the San Gabriel Mountains Foothills and Rivers Act; H.R. 1708, the Rim of Valley Corridor Protection Act; and H.R. 2642, the Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. This legislation would preserve majestic landscapes and rivers for future generations, protect tribal lands and cultural sites from oil and gas development, improve access to public lands for underserved communities, address the threats of climate change by increasing wildfire resiliency, and boost our country’s thriving outdoor recreation economy. On February 12, the House approved H.R. 2546 by a vote of 231-183 (House roll call vote 69). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. While the Senate took no action on H.R. 2546, its text was added as an amendment on July 21 to the House version of H.R. 6395, the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act, but the language was stripped in the conference committee and not included in the bill that became law on January 1, 2021.

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 21 7. HEROES ACT COVID-19 RELIEF PACKAGE Chair Nita Lowey (D-NY) sponsored H.R. 6800, the Heroes Act. This bill would provide funding to state and local governments, tribes, and territories to maintain the essential services they provide and additional funding to support transit. Additionally, this bill included a moratorium on all utility disconnects and a mandate that no household lose water service due to inability to pay, $3.6 billion dedicated to election assistance funding, environmental justice grants to understand the links between pollution exposure and the impacts of COVID-19, an Occupational Safety and Health Administration emergency standard, and support for the U.S. Postal Service at a time when President Trump’s Postmaster General was sabotaging mail delivery ahead of a national election in which millions of voters were poised to vote by mail as a safe alternative to in-person voting. On May 15, the House approved H.R. 6800 by a vote of 208-199 (House roll call vote 109). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. On December 27, the president signed into law bare-bones COVID-19 relief as part of the year-end package (H.R. 133), which included support for transit agencies but none of the other important provisions listed above.

8. WASHINGTON D.C. STATEHOOD Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) sponsored H.R. 51, the Washington, D.C. Ad- mission Act, which would provide statehood to D.C. and its more than 700,000 residents. For far too long, residents of Washington, D.C. have been denied a vote in Congress and the ability to govern locally without the threat of targeted interference. D.C. residents face a disproportionate impact of our federal government’s failure to act on climate and other pressing environmental harms. Low-income, Black and Indigenous communities have historically suffered the conse- quences of pollution and public health risks, and D.C. residents, more than half of whom are people of color, have experienced this environmental racism for generations. H.R. 51 seeks to address this injustice by admitting D.C. into the union with full representation in Congress. On June 26, the House approved H.R. 51 by a vote of 232-180 (House roll call vote 122). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

9. HARMING WORKERS BY ROLLING BACK WAGE PROTECTIONS Representative Virginia Foxx (NC-5) offered an amendment to H.R. 2, the Moving Forward Act, which would roll back wage protections that are currently in place to protect workers in federally- aided highway and public transportation projects. Prevailing wage protections, otherwise known as Davis-Bacon laws, prevent contractors from bringing in outside labor and undercutting the local rate, or the prevailing wage for the area, and are essential to protecting good jobs, ensuring all workers earn a fair wage, and can be an important tool in reducing pay gaps for women and people of color. Economic inequality and the climate crisis are inextricably linked, and supporting high-quality jobs is an essential part of shifting from an exploitative economic model to one that values workers and protects our environment. On July 1, the House rejected the Foxx amendment by a vote of 147-274 (House roll call vote 135). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

22 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 10. ELIMINATING LEAD SERVICE LINES TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH Representative Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) offered an amendment to H.R. 2, the Moving Forward Act, which would invest $4.5 billion per year for five years to fully replace lead service lines that provide drinking water to communities across the nation. The funding would prioritize disadvan- taged and environmental justice communities, who disproportionately have lead service lines in their homes. No level of lead is safe, and lead in drinking water can particularly harm the develop- ing brains of children. On July 1, the House approved the Tlaib amendment by a vote of 240-181 (House roll call vote 136). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House approved H.R. 2 on July 1, but the Senate took no action on this legislation.

11. INVESTING IN CLIMATE-AMBITIOUS INFRASTRUCTURE Chair Peter DeFazio (D-OR) sponsored H.R. 2, the Moving Forward Act, which would reautho- rize surface transportation programs, fund water infrastructure improvements, and help tackle climate change and environmental justice through numerous different programs. This bill represents an important down payment on a healthy and safe clean energy economy and would put clean energy workers back to work now, ensure communities have clean drinking water systems, protect public health by reducing air pollution, build transportation and energy infrastructure more resilient to climate change’s impacts, and preserve nature. This wide-ranging infrastructure package would help directly confront environmental racism by, among other policies, replacing lead pipes and reducing the roadway air pollution that exposes Black, Indigenous, and people of color to higher levels of toxic pollution. On July 1, the House approved H.R. 2 by a vote of 233- 188 (House roll call vote 138). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

12. MAINTAINING SUSPENSION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS TESTING Representative Ben McAdams (D-UT) offered an amendment to H.R. 6395, the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2021, which would pro- hibit the use of NDAA fiscal year 2021 funds for explosive nuclear testing and put in place restrictions on any resumption of nuclear test explosions in the future. Earlier this year, senior national security officials in the Trump administration actively discussed the resumption of nuclear weapons testing in Nevada, a move that would cause turmoil with international partners with whom the U.S. has multilateral arms agreements and pose significant risks to human health and the environment. This amendment would honor international arms agreements and safeguard communities and the environment from the devastating effects of nuclear weapons testing. On July 20, the House approved the McAdams amendment by a vote of 227-179 (House roll call vote 142). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. On January 1, 2021, H.R. 6395 became law after the Senate approved it again, over President Trump’s veto. Neither the House-approved funding prohibition nor the Senate’s $10 million for conducting explosive nuclear tests were included in the final bill.

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 23 13. PROTECTING THE GRAND CANYON AND COLORADO’S PUBLIC LANDS Representative Joe Neguse (D-CO) offered an amendment to H.R. 6395, the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, which would add the text of H.R. 823, the Colorado Outdoor Recreation and Economy (CORE) Act, designating 400,000 acres of wilderness areas in Colorado, supporting the growing outdoor recreation economy in the state, and honoring our veterans by designating Camp Hale as the first National Historical Landscape. The amendment would also withdraw one million acres of public lands surrounding Grand Canyon National Park from new mining claims to protect our cultural and natural heritage as well as the tribal communities and sacred sites, local economies, and safe water supplies in and near this iconic landscape. On July 21, the House approved the Neguse amendment by a vote of 234-181 (House roll call vote 147). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Neguse language was not included in any version of H.R. 6395 that passed the Senate, and on January 1, 2021, the bill became law without the Neguse language.

14. GREAT AMERICAN OUTDOORS ACT Representative Joe Cunningham (D-SC) sponsored the Great American Outdoors Act (GAOA), which provides full and permanent funding of $900 million annually for the Land and Water Conservation Fund as well as funding to address the deferred maintenance backlog in our national parks and other public lands. By investing in our public lands and waters, GAOA will protect our nation’s natural heritage and invaluable landscapes, enhance access to the outdoors and green spaces for communities nationwide, and provide much-needed repairs to deteriorating infrastructure in our national parks. On July 22, the House approved H.R. 1957, the vehicle for GAOA, by a vote of 310-107 (House roll call vote 155). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate approved H.R. 1957 on June 17, and the president signed this legislation into law on August 4.

15. REMOVING CONFEDERATE STATUES FROM THE U.S. CAPITOL House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) sponsored H.R. 7573, a bill to remove all statues of individuals who voluntarily served in the Confederacy from the U.S. Capitol building, starting with John C. Calhoun, Charles B. Aycock, and John C. Clarke, who defended slavery, segregation, and white supremacy. This bill would also replace the bust of Roger Brooke Taney--the Chief Jus- tice of the Supreme Court who wrote the majority opinion in the notorius ruling of 1857, which defended both slavery and white supremacy--with a bust of Thurgood Marshall, the Supreme Court’s first Black justice and a champion for justice and equality. This is a small but important step in helping to ameliorate the pain that racism has caused Black, Brown, Indigenous, and other people of color over centuries by removing celebrations of our nation’s history of oppression from public spaces--especially in the U.S. Capitol, a building that belongs to the people. On July 22, the House approved H.R. 7573 by a vote of 305-113 (House roll call vote 156). YES IS THE PRO- ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

24 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 16. BLOCKING TRUMP’S INADEQUATE SOOT STANDARD Representative Paul Tonko (D-NY), as designee of Representative Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), offered an amendment to H.R. 7608, the State, Foreign Operations, Agriculture, Rural Develop- ment, Interior, Environment, Military Construction, and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act, 2021, which would block the Environmental Protection Agency from finalizing the Trump Ad- ministration’s inadequate proposed National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Mat- ter, or soot. This proposed rule ignores the recommendations of scientists and agency experts, and it does not do enough to protect communities, particularly communities of color, from dangerous air pollution. Protecting vulnerable community members from the health impacts of air pollution is required under the Clean Air Act and is particularly pressing since COVID-19 is a respiratory pandemic disproportionately affecting communities of color. On July 24, the House approved the Tonko-Blunt Rochester amendment by a vote of 233-176 (House roll call vote 163). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The House passed H.R. 7608, including the Tonko-Blunt Rochester amendment, on July 24. The Tonko-Blunt Rochester amendment was not included in the FY21 appropriations bill (H.R. 133) that became law.

17. SLASHING EPA FUNDING Representative Jason Smith (R-MO) offered an amendment to H.R. 7608, the State, Foreign Op- erations, Agriculture, Rural Development, Interior, Environment, Military Construction, and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act, 2021, which would have slashed the Environmental Protec- tion Agency’s (EPA) program funding to align with the draconian cuts proposed by the Trump administration. Adequate funding of the EPA is critical to ensuring that the federal government can implement and enforce the various statutes that protect public health and the environment in order to fulfill the promise of clean air, water, and healthy lands for all people. On July 24, the House rejected the Smith amendment by a vote of 155-256 (House roll call vote 164). NO IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE.

18. PRO-ENVIRONMENT FUNDING PACKAGE Chair Nita Lowey (D-NY) sponsored H.R. 7608, the State, Foreign Operations, Agriculture, Rural Development, Interior, Environment, Military Construction, and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act, 2021, which would boost funding for critical environmental, public health, and public lands programs for Fiscal Year 2021, including Environmental Justice, Superfund, Brownfields, and Diesel Emissions Reduction Act programs at the Environmental Protection Agency. In addition, the bill would block extractive activities in or near the Arctic Refuge, Chaco Canyon, the Bound- ary Waters, the Tongass National Forest, and off our coasts. Importantly, the bill also adds $10.2 billion to the Drinking Water and Clean Water State Revolving Funds as much needed emergency supplemental funding. The bill would block attempts by the Trump administration to take away states’ rights to protect their waterways, weaken the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for power plants, and suppress science used in rulemaking. On July 24, the House approved H.R. 7608 by a vote of 224-189 (House roll call vote 166). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. A different bill, the year-end Appropriations and COVID-19 relief package (H.R. 133) approved by Congress and signed into law by the President on December 27, provided funding in line with FY20 amounts for environmental programs for the rest of FY21, but included a few anti-environment riders and did not include pro-environment policy provisions from H.R. 7608.

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 25 19. PROTECTING THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE Chair Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) sponsored H.R. 8015, the Delivering for America Act, which would provide $25 billion in emergency appropriations, block operational changes at the U.S. Postal Service that threaten to politicize mail delivery, and treat election ballots as first class mail. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many voters were unable to safely cast their ballots in person, and instead relied on voting by mail. However, Postmaster DeJoy took partisan actions that ham- pered timely mail delivery. Efforts to undermine or delay mail-in voting threaten participation in our democracy. On August 22, the House approved H.R. 8015 by a vote of 257-150 (House roll call vote 182). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. The Senate took no action on this legislation.

20. INCREASING FUNDING FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT Representative Deb Haaland (D-NM) offered an amendment to H.R. 4447, the Clean Economy Jobs and Innovation Act, which would increase authorizations by 50 percent for renewable energy research and development programs at the Department of Energy, including significant funding authorization boosts for research, development, demonstration, and commercialization activities in the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. This amendment would represent an important down payment on getting our country to 100 percent clean energy production and would help advance technologies to reduce the price of renewable energy and energy efficiency, and develop new solutions to generate, transmit, and use clean energy. The larger wide-ranging research and development package would help reduce carbon emissions in a variety of industries and sectors and boost job growth, particularly in communities where Black, Indigenous, and people of color are exposed to higher levels of toxic pollution. On September 24, the House approved the Haaland amendment by a vote of 235-173 (House roll call vote 203). YES IS THE PRO- ENVIRONMENT VOTE. A smaller increase in authorizations for clean energy research & development programs was included in the year-end appropriations and bare-bones COVID-19 relief package (H.R. 133) signed into law by the president on December 27.

21. PHASING OUT HARMFUL FISHING GEAR Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) sponsored S. 906, the Driftnet Modernization and Bycatch Re- duction Act, which would transition the last U.S. fishery that uses large-scale driftnets away from this harmful fishing practice. This gear partly accounts for more dolphins and porpoises being killed in this fishery than all other observed fisheries combined along the West Coast and Alaska. The bill’s assistance program will help fishers convert to alternative gear that catches swordfish profitably with less waste. On December 10, the House approved a motion to suspend the rules and pass S. 906 by a vote of 283-105 (House roll call vote 242). YES IS THE PRO-ENVIRONMENT VOTE. With the Senate having passed S. 906 by voice vote on July 22, the bill was sent to the president’s desk following House passage, but the president vetoed the bill on January 1, 2021, and prevented it from becoming law.

26 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 27 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

Closing the PFAS CleanWater Protecting People from PFAS Protecting the Rights ofWorkers to Emergency and Climate DisasterAid for Protecting Wilderness Across the 2020 116th Congress Lifetime Great Lakes Restoration Initiative #36 Heroes Act COVID Relief Package #109 Loophole #11 Pollution Organize #50 Puerto Rico #54 West #69

ALABAMA

1 Byrne R 0 2 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ? ?

2 Roby* R 5 4 4 ✖ ✖ % ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ? 3 Rogers, M. R 5 4 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 4 Aderholt R 5 4 3 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ?

5 Brooks, M. R 0 2 8 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

6 Palmer R 0 0 1 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

7 Sewell D 90 94 81 % % % ? ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ALASKA

1 Young, Don R 33 20 9 ✖ % % % % ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? AMERICAN SAMOA

1 Radewagen R 0 14 14 ? i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

ARIZONA

1 O’Halleran D 100 98 92 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Kirkpatrick** D 93 94 73 E E E E E E ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Grijalva D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 Gosar R 5 4 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

5 Biggs R 0 0 5 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

6 Schweikert R 14 14 6 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 7 Gallego D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

8 Lesko R 0 2 1 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

9 Stanton D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ARKANSAS

1 Crawford R 10 8 5 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? % 2 Hill R 19 14 7 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 3 Womack R 10 8 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 4 Westerman R 10 6 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? * Representative Roby entered statements into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call vote 156, which would have been scored as pro-environment, and roll call votes 50, 54, 135, 136, 138, 142, 147, 155, 163, 164, and 166, which would have been scored as anti-environment. ** Representativ Kirkpatrick was absent for roll call votes 11, 13, 36, 50, 54, and 69 due to a family emergency. 28 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

Maintaining Suspension of Nuclear HarmingWorkers by Rolling BackWage Weapons Testing #142 Protecting the Grand Canyon and Eliminating Lead Service Lines to Protect Investing in Climate-Ambitious Removing Confederate Statues Increasing Funding for Renewable Washington D.C. Statehood #122 Protections #135 Great American Outdoors Act Blocking Trump’s Inadequate Soot Public Health #136 Colorado's Public Lands #147 Slashing EPA Funding #164 Pro-Environment Funding Package #166 Protecting the US Postal Service #182 Phasing Out Harmful Fishing Gear #242 Infrastructure #138 from the U.S. Capitol #156 Standard #163 Energy Research & Development #203

ALABAMA

1 Byrne R 0 2 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ? ?

5 Brooks, M. R 0 2 8 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

6 Palmer R 0 0 1 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

7 Sewell D 90 94 81 % % % ? ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ALASKA

1 Young, Don R 33 20 9 ✖ % % % % ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? AMERICAN SAMOA

1 Radewagen R 0 14 14 ? i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

ARIZONA

5 Biggs R 0 0 5 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

6 Schweikert R 14 14 6 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 7 Gallego D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

8 Lesko R 0 2 1 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

9 Stanton D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ARKANSAS

1 Crawford R 10 8 5 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? % 2 Hill R 19 14 7 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 3 Womack R 10 8 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 4 Westerman R 10 6 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ?

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 29 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

CALIFORNIA

1 LaMalfa R 5 6 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ 2 Huffman D 100 100 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Garamendi D 100 98 91 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

4 McClintock R 0 2 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

5 Thompson, M. D 100 94 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 6 Matsui D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Bera D 100 98 94 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Cook* R 15 14 5 ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ i 9 McNerney D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 10 Harder D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 11 DeSaulnier** D 95 100 99 % % % % % % E % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

12 Pelosi D N/A N/A 94 THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE VOTES AT HER DISCRETION THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE VOTES AT HER DISCRETION

13 Lee, B. D 100 100 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 14 Speier, J. D 100 96 91 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 15 Swalwell D 100 78 92 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 16 Costa D 100 88 54 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 17 Khanna D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 18 Eshoo D 100 96 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 19 Lofgren D 90 92 91 % % % % ? % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 20 Panetta D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 21 Cox D 90 94 94 % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % 22 Nunes R 10 4 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 23 McCarthy R 14 8 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 24 Carbajal D 100 98 94 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 25 Garcia† R 21 N/A 21 i i i i i i i ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ %

* Representative Cook resigned on December 7, 2020, in order to take his seat on the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors. ** Representative DeSaulnier entered statements into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 109, which would have been scored as pro-environment. He was absent for that vote due to a medical leave in which he was hospitalized. † Representative Garcia was sworn in on May 19, 2020, after winning a special election.

30 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

CALIFORNIA

4 McClintock R 0 2 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

12 Pelosi D N/A N/A 94 THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE VOTES AT HER DISCRETION THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE VOTES AT HER DISCRETION

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 31 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

26 Brownley D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 27 Chu D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 28 Schiff D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 29 Cárdenas D 100 100 88 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 30 Sherman D 100 96 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 31 Aguilar D 100 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 32 Napolitano D 95 96 91 % % % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 33 Lieu D 95 94 91 % % % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 34 Gomez D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 35 Torres D 95 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % 36 Ruiz D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 37 Bass D 100 96 88 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 38 Sánchez D 95 96 94 % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 39 Cisneros D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 40 Roybal-Allard* D 95 98 96 % % % % % % E % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 41 Takano D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 42 Calvert R 14 14 7 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? 43 Waters, Maxine D 100 98 92 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 44 Barragán D 100 100 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 45 Porter D 100 94 94 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 46 Correa D 100 96 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 47 Lowenthal D 100 100 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 48 Rouda D 100 92 92 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 49 Levin, M. D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

50 Hunter** R 0 6 2 ? ? i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

51 Vargas D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

* Representative Roybal-Allard issued a statement expressing support for the legislation related to roll call vote 109, which was the pro-environment position. She was absent for this vote due to the public health emergency caused by the coronavirus pandemic. ** Representative Hunter was recorded as not voting on roll call votes 11 and 13 because Congressional rules prevent those convicted of a serious crime from voting. He pleaded guilty on December 3, 2019 to charges he used campaign funds for personal expenses and resigned on January 13, 2020.

32 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

50 Hunter** R 0 6 2 ? ? i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

51 Vargas D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 33 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

52 Peters, S. D 100 98 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 53 Davis, S.* D 95 94 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ? COLORADO

1 DeGette D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Neguse D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Tipton R 10 8 7 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

4 Buck R 0 0 3 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

5 Lamborn R 5 6 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 6 Crow D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Perlmutter D 100 98 87 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % CONNECTICUT

1 Larson, J. D 100 98 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Courtney D 100 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 DeLauro D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 Himes D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 5 Hayes D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % DELAWARE

1 Blunt Rochester D 95 96 96 % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

1 Norton D 100 100 100 % i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i FLORIDA

1 Gaetz R 10 18 12 ✖ ✖ % ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? % 2 Dunn R 5 8 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ? ?

3 Yoho R 0 4 2 ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ? ✖

4 Rutherford R 14 16 9 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? % 5 Lawson D 100 98 87 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 6 Waltz R 14 26 26 ✖ ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? %

* Representative S. Davis entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call vote 242, which would have been scored as pro-environment.

34 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

52 Peters, S. D 100 98 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 53 Davis, S.* D 95 94 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ? COLORADO

4 Buck R 0 0 3 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

1 Blunt Rochester D 95 96 96 % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

1 Norton D 100 100 100 % i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i FLORIDA

1 Gaetz R 10 18 12 ✖ ✖ % ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? % 2 Dunn R 5 8 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ? ?

3 Yoho R 0 4 2 ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ? ✖

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 35 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

7 Murphy D 95 96 91 % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Posey R 19 16 6 % % % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 9 Soto D 100 98 99 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 10 Demings D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 11 Webster R 10 12 6 ✖ ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 12 Bilirakis R 19 20 10 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 13 Crist D 100 98 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 14 Castor D 100 98 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 15 Spano R 5 8 8 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ 16 Buchanan R 33 32 23 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ %

17 Steube R 0 4 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ?

18 Mast R 29 34 29 % % % ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 19 Rooney, F.* R 19 42 23 % % % ✖ ✖ % ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ? ? 20 Hastings D 100 97 85 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 21 Frankel D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 22 Deutch D 100 98 92 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 23 Wasserman Schultz D 100 96 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 24 Wilson, F. D 95 94 91 % % % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 25 Diaz-Balart R 29 28 13 ✖ ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % 26 Mucarsel-Powell D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 27 Shalala D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % GEORGIA

1 Carter, E.L. R 14 16 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 2 Bishop, S. D 100 96 55 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Ferguson R 10 8 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? % 4 Johnson, H. D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

* Representative Francis Rooney missed roll call votes 109, 122, 135, 136, 138, 142, 147, 155, 156, 163, 164, and 166, rather than vote in person during the pandemic or cast a proxy vote while House Republican’s lawsuit challenging the legality of proxy voting was being considered.

36 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

17 Steube R 0 4 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ?

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 37 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

5 Lewis, John* D 100 92 100 E E % E E E E % % % % i i i i i i i i i i 5 Hall** D 100 N/A 100 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i % 6 McBath D 95 96 96 % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Woodall R 5 8 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 8 Scott, A. R 10 8 3 ? ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? 9 Collins, D. R 10 8 4 % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ?

10 Hice R 0 0 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

11 Loudermilk R 0 4 1 ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ?

12 Allen R 0 4 1 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ?

13 Scott, D. D 100 98 84 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 14 Graves, T.† R 5 6 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ? ? ✖ ✖ ? i GUAM

1 San Nicolas D 100 93 93 % i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i HAWAII

1 Case D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Gabbard‡ D 76 74 92 % % ? ? ? ? % % % % % % % % % % % % ? % % IDAHO

1 Fulcher R 5 4 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 2 Simpson R 19 20 9 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ILLINOIS

1 Rush D 100 98 81 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Kelly, R. D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Lipinski D 90 94 91 % % % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % 4 García D 100 100 100 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 5 Quigley D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

* Representative Lewis entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 11 and 13, which would have been scored as pro-environment. Representative Lewis was absent for roll call votes 11, 13, 50, 54, 69, and 109 due to medical treatment and died of cancer on July 17, 2020. ** Representative Hall was sworn in on December 3, 2020, after winning a special election. † Representative T. Graves resigned on October 4, 2020. ‡ Representative Gabbard missed a number of votes while campaigning for U.S. president. She entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call vote 182, which would have been scored as pro-environment.

38 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

10 Hice R 0 0 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

11 Loudermilk R 0 4 1 ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ?

12 Allen R 0 4 1 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ?

13 Scott, D. D 100 98 84 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 14 Graves, T.† R 5 6 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ? ? ✖ ✖ ? i GUAM

1 San Nicolas D 100 93 93 % i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i HAWAII

1 Case D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Gabbard‡ D 76 74 92 % % ? ? ? ? % % % % % % % % % % % % ? % % IDAHO

1 Fulcher R 5 4 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 2 Simpson R 19 20 9 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ILLINOIS

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 39 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

6 Casten D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Davis, D. D 100 98 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Krishnamoorthi D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 9 Schakowsky D 95 96 98 % % % % % % % % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % 10 Schneider D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 11 Foster* D 100 98 94 % % E % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 12 Bost R 24 16 7 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ % 13 Davis, R. R 38 26 10 ✖ ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ % 14 Underwood D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 15 Shimkus R 14 12 6 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ? 16 Kinzinger R 29 20 8 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % 17 Bustos D 100 98 90 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 18 LaHood R 14 10 3 ✖ ✖ % ? ✖ ? ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % INDIANA

1 Visclosky D 95 98 83 % % % % % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % 2 Walorski R 14 12 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 3 Banks R 5 4 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 4 Baird R 5 4 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 5 Brooks, S.** R 24 24 8 ✖ ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % 6 Pence R 10 10 10 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? 7 Carson D 100 96 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Bucshon R 14 12 6 ✖ ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 9 Hollingsworth R 10 24 15 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ IOWA

1 Finkenauer D 95 94 94 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Loebsack D 100 98 91 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

* Representative Foster was absent for roll call vote 36 due to a family emergency. ** Representative Brooks entered statements into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call votes 122 and 182, which would have been scored as anti-environment.

40 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

1 Finkenauer D 95 94 94 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Loebsack D 100 98 91 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 41 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

3 Axne D 95 94 94 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 King, S.* R 5 4 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ KANSAS

1 Marshall R 5 10 6 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 2 Watkins** R 5 8 8 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ 3 Davids D 90 94 94 % % ? % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

4 Estes R 0 8 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

KENTUCKY

1 Comer R 10 8 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 2 Guthrie R 14 12 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 3 Yarmuth D 100 96 94 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

4 Massie R 0 2 10 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

5 Rogers, H. R 10 8 8 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 6 Barr R 10 10 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ LOUISIANA

1 Scalise R 14 6 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 2 Richmond D 95 94 77 % % % % % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % 3 Higgins, C. R 10 6 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ %

4 Johnson, M. R 0 2 3 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ?

5 Abraham† R 5 2 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ? ? 6 Graves, G. R 5 12 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? MAINE

1 Pingree D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Golden D 95 96 96 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

* Representative King entered statements into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 122, 135, 136, 138, 142, and 182, which would have been scored as anti-environment. ** Representative Watkins entered statements into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 163, 164, and 166, which would have been scored as anti- environment. † Representative Abraham entered statements into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 122 and 166, which would have been scored as anti-environment.

42 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

3 Axne D 95 94 94 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 King, S.* R 5 4 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ KANSAS

4 Estes R 0 8 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

KENTUCKY

4 Massie R 0 2 10 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

4 Johnson, M. R 0 2 3 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ?

5 Abraham† R 5 2 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ? ? 6 Graves, G. R 5 12 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? MAINE

1 Pingree D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Golden D 95 96 96 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 43 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

MARYLAND

1 Harris, A. R 0 0 3 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖

2 Ruppersberger D 100 98 89 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Sarbanes D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 Brown, A. D 95 96 93 % % % % % % % % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % 5 Hoyer D 100 98 82 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 6 Trone D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Mfume* D 100 N/A 100 i i i i i i % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Raskin D 100 100 99 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % MASSACHUSETTS

1 Neal D 100 98 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 McGovern D 100 100 99 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Trahan D 95 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % % 4 Kennedy, Joseph P. D 100 100 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 5 Clark, K. D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 6 Moulton D 100 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Pressley D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Lynch D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 9 Keating D 95 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ? MICHIGAN

1 Bergman R 14 16 11 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 2 Huizenga R 29 12 5 ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 3 Amash I 14 16 18 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 4 Moolenaar R 19 16 7 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 5 Kildee D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 6 Upton R 62 52 28 % % % ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ % % % ✖ % ✖ % % % 7 Walberg R 5 8 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

* Representative Mfume was sworn in on May 5, 2020, after winning a special election following the death of Representative Cummings on October 17, 2019.

44 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

MARYLAND

1 Harris, A. R 0 0 3 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 45 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

8 Slotkin D 95 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % 9 Levin, A. D 100 100 100 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 10 Mitchell* R 14 10 6 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ? ? 11 Stevens D 100 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 12 Dingell D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 13 Tlaib D 95 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % 14 Lawrence D 100 94 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % MINNESOTA

1 Hagedorn R 5 6 6 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 2 Craig D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Phillips D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 McCollum D 100 98 94 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 5 Omar D 95 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % 6 Emmer R 10 8 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 7 Peterson D 76 72 34 % % % % % % % ✖ % % ✖ ? % % % ✖ % ✖ % % % 8 Stauber R 29 16 16 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ MISSISSIPPI

1 Kelly, T. R 5 6 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 2 Thompson, B. D 100 92 83 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Guest R 10 10 10 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 4 Palazzo R 10 8 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % MISSOURI

1 Clay D 95 96 90 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ? 2 Wagner R 24 14 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? 3 Luetkemeyer R 5 6 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 4 Hartzler R 10 8 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ %

* Representative Mitchell entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 109, which would have been scored as anti-environment. He quit the Republican party and became an Independent on December 14, 2020, but because that was after the roll call votes scored here, he is labeled as a Republican for the purposes of thisScorecard.

46 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 47 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

5 Cleaver D 86 92 89 % % ? ? ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 6 Graves, S. R 14 8 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ 7 Long R 10 8 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 8 Smith, J. R 5 2 1 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ MONTANA

1 Gianforte R 19 10 7 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % NEBRASKA

1 Fortenberry R 43 38 21 ✖ % % ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ % 2 Bacon R 24 30 16 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ 3 Smith, Adrian R 5 4 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ NEVADA

1 Titus D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Amodei R 24 16 7 ✖ ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ 3 Lee, S.* D 95 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % 4 Horsford D 100 98 84 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % NEW HAMPSHIRE

1 Pappas D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Kuster D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % NEW JERSEY

1 Norcross D 100 98 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Van Drew R 67 82 82 % % % % % % ✖ ✖ % % % ✖ % % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ? 3 Kim D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 Smith, C. R 81 76 62 % % % % % % ✖ ✖ % % % ✖ % % % % % ✖ % % % 5 Gottheimer D 100 98 88 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 6 Pallone D 100 100 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Malinowski D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Sires D 100 96 91 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

* Representative Lee entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call vote 138, which would have been scored as pro-environment.

48 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

1 Gianforte R 19 10 7 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % NEBRASKA

1 Pappas D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Kuster D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % NEW JERSEY

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 49 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

9 Pascrell D 100 100 94 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 10 Payne D 86 88 91 ? ? % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 11 Sherrill D 100 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 12 Watson Coleman D 100 100 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % NEW MEXICO

1 Haaland D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Torres Small D 95 96 96 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Luján, B.R. D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % NEW YORK

1 Zeldin R 24 26 14 ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 2 King, P. R 52 46 19 % % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % % % ✖ % ✖ ✖ 3 Suozzi D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 Rice, K. D 90 92 94 % % ? % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 5 Meeks D 100 96 90 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 6 Meng D 100 100 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Velázquez D 100 100 94 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Jeffries D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 9 Clarke, Y. D 100 100 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 10 Nadler* D 100 100 97 E E % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 11 Rose D 100 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 12 Maloney, C. D 100 100 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 13 Espaillat D 100 100 99 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 14 Ocasio-Cortez D 95 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % 15 Serrano D 86 93 93 ? ? % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 16 Engel D 100 100 94 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 17 Lowey D 100 96 94 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

* Representative Nadler entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 11 and 13, which would have been scored as pro-environment. He was absent for the votes due to his wife’s pancreatic cancer.

50 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 51 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

18 Maloney, S.P. D 100 98 90 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 19 Delgado D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 20 Tonko D 100 100 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 21 Stefanik R 48 52 38 ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % % % ✖ % ✖ % 22 Brindisi D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 23 Reed, T. R 48 38 13 % % % ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ % 24 Katko R 62 54 34 ✖ % % % % ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ % % % % ✖ % % % 25 Morelle D 90 94 94 % % % ? ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 26 Higgins, B. D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 27 Jacobs* R 33 N/A 33 i i i i i i i i i i i i ✖ ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % NORTH CAROLINA

1 Butterfield D 100 96 90 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Holding** R 10 6 2 ✖ % % ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ? ? 3 Murphy R 10 11 11 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ 4 Price D 100 98 92 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 5 Foxx R 10 10 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ 6 Walker R 5 4 1 ? ? ✖ ✖ ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 7 Rouzer R 14 10 4 % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 8 Hudson R 5 8 2 ✖ % ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

9 Bishop R 0 0 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ?

10 McHenry R 14 20 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 11 Meadows† R 17 3 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? ✖ i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i 12 Adams D 95 96 97 % % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 13 Budd R 10 8 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ %

* Representative Jacobs was sworn in on July 21, 2020, after winning a special election following the resignation of Representative Chris Collins on September 30, 2019. ** Representative Holding entered statements into the Congressional Record noting how she would have voted on roll call votes 155 and 156, which would have been scored as pro-environment, and roll call votes 50, 147, 163, and 164, which would have been scored as anti-environment. † Representative Meadows resigned on March 30, 2020 to become White House Chief of Staff.

52 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

9 Bishop R 0 0 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ?

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 53 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

NORTH DAKOTA

1 Armstrong R 0 6 6 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS

1 Sablan I 100 100 100 % i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i OHIO

1 Chabot R 14 12 12 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 2 Wenstrup R 5 4 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 3 Beatty D 95 96 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ? 4 Jordan R 5 2 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 5 Latta R 10 8 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 6 Johnson, B. R 14 10 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 7 Gibbs R 19 12 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ? ? ? ? ✖ % 8 Davidson R 10 8 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 9 Kaptur D 90 96 84 % % % % % % % % % % % ? % % % ? % % % % % 10 Turner R 33 22 10 % % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ 11 Fudge D 90 92 93 % % % % % % % % % % % % ? % % % % % % % ? 12 Balderson R 24 12 11 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ 13 Ryan, T. D 100 80 91 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 14 Joyce R 33 26 12 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ % 15 Stivers R 33 20 8 ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ 16 Gonzalez, A. R 29 24 24 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % OKLAHOMA

1 Hern R 0 2 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

2 Mullin R 5 2 1 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ? ✖ 3 Lucas R 10 8 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? 4 Cole R 10 14 7 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 5 Horn D 90 92 92 % % % ✖ % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

54 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

NORTH DAKOTA

1 Armstrong R 0 6 6 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS

1 Sablan I 100 100 100 % i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i OHIO

1 Hern R 0 2 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 55 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

OREGON

1 Bonamici D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Walden* R 19 20 10 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ 3 Blumenauer D 100 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 DeFazio D 100 98 92 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 5 Schrader D 86 90 73 % % % ✖ % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % PENNSYLVANIA

1 Fitzpatrick** R 84 85 81 E E % % % % ✖ ✖ % % % % % % % % % ✖ % % % 2 Boyle D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Evans† D 100 98 96 E E % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 Dean D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 5 Scanlon D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 6 Houlahan D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Wild D 95 96 96 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Cartwright D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 9 Meuser R 10 8 8 ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ 10 Perry R 5 4 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 11 Smucker R 14 10 6 ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 12 Keller R 5 5 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 13 Joyce R 10 6 6 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 14 Reschenthaler R 14 10 10 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? 15 Thompson, G. R 10 8 5 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 16 Kelly, M. R 19 12 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ 17 Lamb D 95 92 88 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 18 Doyle D 95 96 80 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ?

* Representative Brian Fitzpatrick entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call votes 11 and 13, which would have been scored as pro-environment. He was absent for roll call votes 11 and 13 to attend funeral services for his brother, former Congressman Michael G. Fitzpatrick. ** Representative Walden entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 182, which would have been scored as anti-environment. † Representative Evans was absent for roll call votes 11 and 13 due to attending a funeral.

56 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

OREGON

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 57 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

PUERTO RICO

1 González-Colón, J. R 0 14 14 ? i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

RHODE ISLAND

1 Cicilline D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Langevin D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % SOUTH CAROLINA

1 Cunningham D 90 92 92 % % % ✖ % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Wilson, J. R 10 8 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ 3 Duncan, Jeff R 5 6 3 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? 4 Timmons* R 8 10 10 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ E E E E E E E E ✖ ?

5 Norman R 0 4 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

6 Clyburn D 100 96 85 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Rice, T. R 5 8 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % SOUTH DAKOTA

1 Johnson R 10 8 8 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ TENNESSEE

1 Roe R 14 12 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 2 Burchett R 10 10 10 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 3 Fleischmann R 10 8 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 4 DesJarlais R 10 6 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? 5 Cooper D 100 96 83 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 6 Rose R 10 6 6 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 7 Green R 5 2 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ 8 Kustoff R 10 10 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 9 Cohen D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

* Representative Timmons was absent for roll call votes 142, 147, 155, 156, 163, 164, 166, and 182 because he was fulfilling his duty as a member of the South Carolina Air National Guard.

58 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

PUERTO RICO

1 González-Colón, J. R 0 14 14 ? i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

RHODE ISLAND

1 Cicilline D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Langevin D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % SOUTH CAROLINA

5 Norman R 0 4 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

6 Clyburn D 100 96 85 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Rice, T. R 5 8 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % SOUTH DAKOTA

1 Johnson R 10 8 8 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ TENNESSEE

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 59 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

TEXAS

1 Gohmert R 5 4 4 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 2 Crenshaw R 19 14 14 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 3 Taylor R 14 10 10 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 4 Ratcliffe* R 14 8 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? i i i i i i i i i i i i i i

5 Gooden R 0 4 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

6 Wright** R 0 4 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ E ?

7 Fletcher D 100 88 88 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Brady, K. R 5 6 3 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 9 Green, A. D 100 98 87 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 10 McCaul R 33 26 8 ✖ ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % % ✖ ✖ % ✖ %

11 Conaway R 0 4 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

12 Granger R 14 12 6 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % 13 Thornberry R 5 4 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖

14 Weber R 0 2 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

15 Gonzalez D 95 90 80 % % % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 16 Escobar D 95 96 96 % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 17 Flores R 5 6 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ 18 Jackson Lee D 100 96 83 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

19 Arrington R 0 4 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

20 Castro D 100 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

21 Roy R 0 0 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖

22 Olson† R 10 8 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ 23 Hurd R 43 34 13 % % % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ %

24 Marchant R 0 2 3 ? ? ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ?

25 Williams R 10 4 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ %

* Representative Ratcliffe resigned on May 21, 2020 to become Director of National Intelligence. ** Representative Wright was absent for roll call vote 203 due to treatment for pneumonia associated with lung cancer. † Representative Olson entered a statement into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 182, which would have been scored as anti-environment.

60 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

TEXAS

5 Gooden R 0 4 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

6 Wright** R 0 4 4 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ E ?

11 Conaway R 0 4 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

12 Granger R 14 12 6 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % 13 Thornberry R 5 4 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖

14 Weber R 0 2 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

19 Arrington R 0 4 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

20 Castro D 100 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

21 Roy R 0 0 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖

22 Olson† R 10 8 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ 23 Hurd R 43 34 13 % % % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ %

24 Marchant R 0 2 3 ? ? ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ?

25 Williams R 10 4 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ %

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 61 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

26 Burgess R 10 10 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖

27 Cloud R 0 0 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

28 Cuellar D 90 84 47 % % % ✖ % % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % 29 Garcia D 100 94 94 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 30 Johnson, E.B. D 95 96 87 % % % % % % ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 31 Carter, J. R 10 6 4 ? ? % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? % ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? 32 Allred D 100 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 33 Veasey D 100 98 90 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 34 Vela D 100 92 77 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 35 Doggett D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

36 Babin R 0 4 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖

UTAH

1 Bishop, R. R 10 6 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? 2 Stewart R 14 8 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % 3 Curtis R 5 4 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 4 McAdams D 76 82 82 % ✖ % ✖ % % ✖ % % % ✖ % % % % % % ✖ % % % VERMONT

1 Welch* D 100 98 95 % % % % % E % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % VIRGIN ISLANDS

1 Plaskett D 100 79 79 % i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i VIRGINIA

1 Wittman R 19 10 10 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % 2 Luria D 95 96 96 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Scott, R. D 100 98 92 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 McEachin D 100 100 92 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 5 Riggleman R 5 12 12 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ? ✖ ? ✖

6 Cline R 0 0 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

* Representative Welch was absent for roll call vote 69 due to attending a funeral.

62 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

26 Burgess R 10 10 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖

27 Cloud R 0 0 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

36 Babin R 0 4 2 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖

UTAH

1 Welch* D 100 98 95 % % % % % E % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % VIRGIN ISLANDS

1 Plaskett D 100 79 79 % i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i VIRGINIA

6 Cline R 0 0 0 ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 63 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

7 Spanberger D 95 96 96 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Beyer D 100 98 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 9 Griffith R 14 10 6 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ % 10 Wexton D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 11 Connolly D 100 98 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % WASHINGTON

1 DelBene D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2 Larsen, R. D 100 96 92 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Herrera Beutler R 33 28 12 % % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ 4 Newhouse R 14 14 5 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? 5 McMorris Rodgers R 14 12 4 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 6 Kilmer D 100 98 95 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 7 Jayapal D 95 98 97 % % % % % % ✖ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 8 Schrier D 100 98 98 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 9 Smith, Adam D 100 98 91 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 10 Heck D 100 96 96 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % WEST VIRGINIA

1 McKinley R 29 16 8 % % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ % 2 Mooney R 10 10 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % 3 Miller R 19 12 12 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % WISCONSIN

1 Steil R 19 20 20 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ % ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ 2 Pocan D 100 100 97 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 3 Kind D 90 94 90 ? ? % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 4 Moore D 100 98 94 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 5 Sensenbrenner* R 5 2 24 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ?

* Representative Sensenbrenner entered statements into the Congressional Record noting how he would have voted on roll call vote 156, which would have been scored as pro-environment, and roll call vote 155, which would have been scored as anti-environment.

64 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 65 HOUSE VOTES

KEY LCV SCORES

% = Pro-environment action ✖ = Anti-environment action

i = Ineligible to vote ? = Not Voting (counts as negative) = Excused (does not count)

#13

6 Grothman R 5 8 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

7 Tiffany* R 0 N/A 0 i i i i i i i ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖

8 Gallagher R 19 16 8 ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ WYOMING

1 Cheney R 5 4 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖

* Representative Tiffany was sworn in on May 19, 2020, after winning a special election following the resignation of Representative Duffy on September 23, 2019.

66 scorecard.lcv.org | 2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV HOUSE VOTES

#155

6 Grothman R 5 8 3 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖

7 Tiffany* R 0 N/A 0 i i i i i i i ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖

8 Gallagher R 19 16 8 ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ? ? ? ✖ ✖ % % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ WYOMING

1 Cheney R 5 4 2 ✖ ✖ % ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ ? ✖

2020 National Environmental Scorecard · LCV | scorecard.lcv.org 67

BUILD POLITICAL POWER FOR PEOPLE AND THE PLANET

Visit scorecard.lcv.org to explore our interactive National Environmental Scorecard.

Support LCV with a donation at lcv.org/donate.

Become a member and get email updates at lcv.org/get-involved.

Get your senators’ scores straight to your phone by texting “Scorecard” to 877-877.

Take action on a wide array of pressing environmental issues at lcv.org/act.

our earth is worth fighting for. join us. LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS 740 15TH STREET NW, SUITE 700 | WASHINGTON, DC 20005 PHONE: 202.785.8683 | LCV.ORG

instagram.com/LCVoters

facebook.com/LCVoters

twitter.com/LCVoters

youtube.com/LCVorg

This publication was designed and printed using 100% wind power and was printed on an alcohol-free press with soy-based inks on 100% recycled stock.

scorecard.lcv.org