Dublin Ireland: a City Addressing Challenging Water Supply, Management, and Governance Issues

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dublin Ireland: a City Addressing Challenging Water Supply, Management, and Governance Issues Copyright © 2014 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Kelly-Quinn, M., S. Blacklocke, M. Bruen, R. Earle, E. O'Neill, J. O'Sullivan, and P. Purcell. 2014. Dublin Ireland: a city addressing challenging water supply, management, and governance issues. Ecology and Society 19(4): 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ ES-06921-190410 Research, part of a Special Feature on Urban Water Governance Dublin Ireland: a city addressing challenging water supply, management, and governance issues Mary Kelly-Quinn 1, Sean Blacklocke 2, Michael Bruen 2, Ray Earle 3, Eoin O'Neill 4, John O'Sullivan 2 and Patrick Purcell 2 ABSTRACT. The population of Dublin City and its suburbs currently stands at 1.3 million and is projected to reach 2.1 million by 2022. There is pressure on its water supply system (inadequate catchment sources, ageing infrastructure including treatment facilities, and distribution network) with little or no spare capacity despite Ireland’s relatively high rainfall that is well distributed throughout the year; albeit the greatest rainfall occurs in the west and southwest and at some remove from Dublin. The current governance approach to addressing the projected water supply deficit relies heavily on a combination of identifying new supply sources to secure the long-term water supply needs of the city together with an intense drive toward achieving “demand-side” reduced usage and conservation targets in accordance with EU benchmarks for various individual and sectoral users. This potentially emerging crisis of water scarcity in Dublin, with drivers including population growth, greater industrial and institutional demands, migration, and climate change, has generated one of the most significant public water works projects proposed in Irish history, which is to abstract raw water from the Shannon River Basin in the midland region and, following treatment, pump it to a storage reservoir in a cut-away bog before piping to the Greater Dublin Area. The preparations for this scheme have brought to the forefront some longstanding Irish water resources governance issues and challenges. This provides a unique opportunity and imperative at this time to take a more comprehensive look at the decision-making process in this regard, one done in the context of new European and national policies requiring incorporation of integrated planning to sustain ecosystem services, water resources management, water services management, and flood defense principles, and one taking account of the current unprecedented state of flux in which water resources management institutions in Ireland, and in particular Dublin, find themselves following years of unconsolidated legislation and stand-alone institutions. Key Words: demand management; Dublin; full cost recovery; governance; water supply INTRODUCTION accounted for and “internalized” on the externalizing The population of the greater Dublin area (GDA) is projected establishments or sectors, i.e., households, industry, and to grow significantly over the coming decades from its current agriculture, via charges. Resource costs are opportunity costs. 1.3 million. Somewhere in the region of 550 million liters per Therefore, in the case of the Dublin water supply proposal under day of water are currently required (for domestic water supply the WFD, if some volume of water from the Shannon River Basin alone usage is in the range 140 to 150 liters per person per day) is transferred to the Eastern River Basin, and in doing so it can and it is estimated that if demand behavior/culture remains be shown that this volume of water is no longer put to its long- relatively unchanged and factors such as population growth, term highest valued use, there is a resource cost associated with migration/urbanization, climate change, and innovation/ that transfer that should be accounted for, priced, and recovered. technological balance regarding supply/demand are considered, Conversely, if diverting a volume of water makes the use of that this figure will increase to 800 million liters per day by 2031 water more efficient, such as would be the case if a seasonal (Dublin City Council 2010a). There is pressure on the current interbasin transfer could alleviate flood risks in the Shannon water supply infrastructure to meet ever-increasing demand with River Basin while also buffering a chronic potable water supply little or no spare capacity, despite the fact that Ireland has deficit in Dublin, such a transaction would have a negative relatively high rainfall that is well distributed throughout the resource cost and should be added back to the interbasin transfer’s year. Water shortages are not uncommon in the city in summers balance sheet as a benefit offsetting other costs. In reality, the when the preceding winter has had lower than average rainfall. proposal for the Shannon transfer obviously has multiple costs and benefits and thus “full cost accounting” of all of the financial, This comes at a time in which Ireland is being required to environmental, and resource costs is both required and necessary comprehensively revise its water pricing policies pursuant to the before an appropriate charging regime for the use of this water European Water Framework Directive (WFD). “Full cost can be developed. recovery” under the WFD requires Member States to develop pricing schemes that take account of and recover not only the In light of this, we attempt in this paper to highlight some of the financial costs of providing water and sewerage services, e.g., key challenges for water resources management and governance capital, engineering, operation and maintenance, administrative, currently confronting Dublin City and Ireland as a nation, and but also environmental and resource costs. In simplest terms, discuss how these challenges might best be addressed within the environmental costs are equivalent to the hypothetical framework of Ireland’s new emerging water governance expenditures to remediate damages to water resources, e.g., fish institutions. Although many of the issues raised are not habitat, brought about by possibly illegal, poorly regulated, or individually novel, the combination of challenges faced by Dublin even perfectly legal abstractions or effluents/runoff to streams, within the newly emerging national governance framework i.e., “externalized costs.” These environmental costs are to be presents a unique opportunity to provide baseline information 1School of Biology & Environmental Science, University College Dublin, 2School of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering, University College Dublin, 3International Water Association, 4School of Geography, Planning & Environmental Policy, University College Dublin Ecology and Society 19(4): 10 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss4/art10/ for future analysis on the evolution of water governance . An historic focus on water management through supply approaches in Ireland. Although the impetus for the paper is the expansion issue of future supply of potable water to the GDA’s water users, . An absence of domestic water charges tangential and broader aspects of water resources management are considered in the context of Ireland’s ongoing efforts to . Emerging climate change uncertainties incorporate fundamental principles of the Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) concept into its myriad of water governance institutions. In Ireland there is a mismatch between the highest availability of It is noteworthy that although the term governance is variably water for abstraction and the highest concentration of potable interpreted (Franks 2004), it is used here as the “range of political, water users. social, economic and administrative systems that are in place” (as The east of the country has on average 150 rainfall days per year defined by Rogers and Hall 2003:7) to manage water resources. yielding between 750 and 1000 mm of rainfall (Met Éireann 2014). There is not one single, ideal governance model, suitable for all The 225 days of rainfall in the west generally average between situations, and there is general agreement that good governance 1000 and 1250 mm per year but exceed 2000 mm per year in many can be achieved with a variety of different paradigms, including mountainous areas. Dublin City sits in the east of the country at elements of top-down, bottom-up, market forces and the foot of the Dublin-Wicklow Mountains. Although there are collaborative networks. several medium to small rivers and two canals within the GDA there are no substantial natural lakes within 50 km of the city. Many advocate that water governance should only deal with the Furthermore, no major aquifers exist within Dublin City processes and institutions that make decisions about water Council’s jurisdictional boundary. resources (e.g., Lautze et al. 2011) although the principles of effective water governance, compiled by the Global Water The historic development of Dublin’s water supply underlies some Partnership (Rogers and Hall 2003) and set out in UN Water of its current problems. documents (UNESCO 2009) also include outcomes as Sourcing of water within its own jurisdiction and from the highlighted by Lautze et al. (2011). The 12 principles are: open, jurisdictions of the other local authorities is a practice that is likely transparent, participative, accountable, effective, coherent, to continue to create problems for the GDA in the future. The city efficient, communicative, equitable, integrative, sustainable, and has a system of water supply that has
Recommended publications
  • A Vision of South Dublin's Future Final.Indd
    A VISION FOR SOUTH DUBLIN’S FUTURE 2 Chief Executive’s Invitation The review of the County Development Plan and the preparation of a new Plan is one of the most important functions of South Dublin County Council. The South Dublin County Council Development Plan 2016-2022 will set out a vision for South Dublin’s future to 2022 and beyond. The review has come at a time of change. Following a period of economic contraction the outlook for the period of the next Plan is more positive. This time of transition and renewed growth presents new challenges in the way we plan for our future and offers opportunities to examine innovative ways and means of achieving a brighter future for the citizens of South Dublin County. The publication of this booklet “A Vision for South Dublin’s Future” is the fi rst step in the plan making process. The booklet presents an overview of the main development issues currently impacting on South Dublin County and identifi es the kind of planning matters that the next County Development Plan could address. We have attempted to highlight the issues that we think are important but this list is by no means exhaustive. Now we want to hear from you. Have we overlooked issues, which are of importance to you? If so we need to know what these are. Public input at the start of the plan making process is important so that the fi nal Plan can refl ect and respond to public concerns and aspirations. Daniel McLoughlin, Chief Executive, South Dublin County Council September 2014 3 Table of Contents Introduction 6 Population & Housing
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Dublin Area: Ireland's Potential City-State of the Early 21St
    Technological University Dublin ARROW@TU Dublin Doctoral Built Environment 2010-01-01 The Greater Dublin Area: Ireland's Potential City-State of the Early 21st. Century Brian Hughes Technological University Dublin Follow this and additional works at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/builtdoc Recommended Citation Hughes, B. (2010) The Greater Dublin Area: Ireland's Potential City-State of the Early 21st Century. Doctoral Thesis. Dublin, Technological University Dublin. doi:10.21427/D7JS4M This Theses, Ph.D is brought to you for free and open access by the Built Environment at ARROW@TU Dublin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral by an authorized administrator of ARROW@TU Dublin. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License THE GREATER DUBLIN AREA – IRELAND’S POTENTIAL CITY-STATE OF THE EARLY 21ST CENTURY Brian P. Hughes, Dip. Env. Econ., MeRSA, FSCS, FRICS Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD Dublin Institute of Technology Bolton Street Campus Supervisors: Professor John Ratcliffe PhD., Dean of Faculty of the Built Environment, DIT Emeritus Professor Dr Seamus Caulfield (UCD). Advisory Supervisor: Dr Brendan Williams (UCD) Frank McCann, Technical Quantitative Advice. Lecturing Schools: Construction, Real Estate and Construction Economics Spatial Planning and Environmental Management, Submitted on 29th June, 2009 Viva: January 14th, 2010 Post-Viva restructuring instructions received from Graduate Office on 9th March 2010 Final Submission: 8th September 2010 Internal Reader and Post-Viva Supervisor: Dr Lorcan Sirr Asst. Supervisor: Dr Brendan Williams i ABSTRACT THE GREATER DUBLIN AREA – IRELAND’S EMERGING CITY-STATE OF THE EARLY 21ST CENTURY Dublin’s superior population and employment growth, its scale size and unique urban agglomerative momentum will result in it emerging as Ireland’s ‘city state’ by mid-to- late 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro North Belinstown to St. Stephen's Green
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT – METRO NORTH BELINSTOWN TO ST. STEPHEN’S GREEN VOLUME 1 – BOOK 1 OF 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Volume 2 For ease of local identification this Environmental Environmental Impact – Area MN101 Impact Statement (EIS) has been divided into seven Environmental Impact – Area MN102 areas. These areas are numbered Area MN101 to Area MN107 inclusive going from Belinstown in Environmental Impact – Area MN103 north County Dublin to St. Stephen’s Green in the Environmental Impact – Area MN104 city centre. Environmental Impact – Area MN105 The environmental impact of the proposed scheme in each of these areas is set out in individual books Environmental Impact – Area MN106 numbered MN101 to MN107 and which collectively Environmental Impact – Area MN107 make up Volume 2 of this EIS. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is being Volume 2 of the EIS published in three separate Volumes as follows: is set out in 18 Chapters as follows: Chapter 1 Introduction to Areas MN101 -107 Volume 1 Chapter 2 Human Beings: Landuse Introduction to the scheme and a description of the receiving environment Chapter 3 Human Beings: Socio-economics Chapter 4 Human Beings: Noise Volume 1 of the EIS Chapter 5 Human Beings: Vibration is set out in 25 Chapters as follows: Chapter 6 Human Beings: Chapter 1 Introduction Radiation and Stray Current Chapter 2 Need and Objectives Chapter 7 Human Beings: Traffic Chapter 3 Legislation Chapter 8 Flora and Fauna Chapter 4 Planning and Policy Context Chapter 9 Soil and Geology Chapter 5 Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • VA10.5.072 – Nethercross Ltd. T.A Roganstown Golf & Country Club
    Appeal No. VA10/5/072 AN BINSE LUACHÁLA VALUATION TRIBUNAL AN tACHT LUACHÁLA, 2001 VALUATION ACT, 2001 Nethercross Ltd. t/a Roganstown Golf & County Club APPELLANT and Commissioner of Valuation RESPONDENT RE: Property No. 359211, Hotel at Naul Road, Swords, County Dublin B E F O R E John Kerr - Chartered Surveyor Deputy Chairperson Michael Connellan Jr - Solicitor Member Patricia O'Connor - Solicitor Member JUDGMENT OF THE VALUATION TRIBUNAL ISSUED ON THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011 By Notice of Appeal dated the 25th day of August, 2010 the appellant appealed against the determination of the Commissioner of Valuation in fixing a valuation of €638,000 on the above described relevant property. The Grounds of Appeal as set out in the Notice of Appeal which are attached at the Appendix to this judgment 2 The appeal proceeded by way of an oral hearing, which took place in the offices of the Valuation Tribunal, located on the first floor of Ormond House, Ormond Quay, Dublin, on the 11th February, 2011. The appellant was represented by Mr Owen Hickey, SC, instructed by John Walsh Solicitors, Ranelagh, Dublin y. Mr. Alan McMillan, MSCS. MRICS, FIAVI, ACIArb, of GVA Donal O’Buachalla gave expert evidence on behalf of the appellant. Mr. Ian McGuiness, Director of the subject hotel, also attended the hearing. The respondent was represented by Mr David Dodd, BL, instructed by the Chief State Solicitor. Mr. Liam Cahill, B.A., ASCS., MIAVI, Valuer at the Valuation Office gave expert evidence on behalf of the respondent. Mr. Alan Sweeney, Valuer, and Ms Yvonne Kiernan, Valuer, both with the Valuation Office, attended as observers.
    [Show full text]
  • Dublin City (Dublin County Borough) Development Board, Jan, 2002 Dublin City Profile (Dublin County Borough)
    National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis NIRSA Working Paper Series No. 15 January 2002 Dublin City Profile (Dublin County Borough) Prepared for DUBLIN CITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD By Jim Walsh, Joe Brady and Chris Mannion NIRSA National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Maynooth, Co. Kildare Ireland i Report for the Dublin City (Dublin County Borough) Development Board, Jan, 2002 Dublin City Profile (Dublin County Borough) Prepared for DUBLIN CITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD By Prof. Jim Walsh, Dr. Joe Brady & Chris Mannion THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REGIONAL AND SPATIAL ANALYSIS (NIRSA) NUI MAYNOOTH i Report for the Dublin City (Dublin County Borough) Development Board, Jan, 2002 Foreword This Report is divided into two parts the main or first part is the written text divided into eight chapters. Part two is an accompanying Book of Maps, which have been bound separately for easy reference. Part One Chapter 1 introduces the aims of the report and outlines the role Dublin City has on both a regional and national level. Chapter 2 has a brief description of the physical landscape together with some pertinent facts required by the Shared Vision Project. The distribution and location of the physical heritage of Dublin City with regard to Archaeological Sites & National Monuments, National Heritage Areas and Special Areas of Conversation are also detailed in this chapter. Chapter 3 is a Classification of socio-economic areas in Dublin City and County or Greater Dublin Area using primarily data from the 1996 Census of Population. In addition ‘a typology’of Dublin City and County or Greater Dublin Area is given using the census of population statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Planning Guidelines for the Greater Dublin Area 2010-2022 (Volume II – Appendices and Background Papers)
    Regional Planning Guidelines for the Greater Dublin Area 2010-2022 (Volume II – Appendices and Background Papers) REGIONAL PLANNING GUIDELINES FOR THE GREATER DUBLIN AREA 2010-2022 Prepared by Dublin & Mid-East Regional Authorities. Volume II Appendices & Background Papers Table of Contents Volume II A1 Effective Integration of Spatial, Land Use and Transport Planning. A2 Indicators for future Monitoring and Reports on RPGs Implementation. A3 Occupancy Rates for Target Year by Council. A4 River Basin Management Plans – Note on Monitoring. A5 Strategic Environmental Assessment. A6 Habitats Directive Assessment. A7 Background Papers for Regional Economic Strategy • Forfás Regional Competitiveness Agenda: Volume II -Realising Potential: East • Economic Development Action Plan for the Dublin City Region • Mid East Regional Authority Economic Development Strategy. A8 Definition of Metropolitan and Hinterland Area. Appendix A1 Effective Integration of Spatial, Land Use and Transport Planning Appendix A1 Effective Integration of Spatial, Land Use and Transport Planning As part of the review process for the Regional Planning Guidelines, the policies, objectives and recommendations of this document seek to ensure consistency between all strands of the regional planning strategy and relevant transport strategies, including T21, ‘Smarter Travel’, National Transport Authority strategies and the objectives of the Dublin Transport Authority Act. While no NTA strategy has yet been published, the RPGs are committed to ensuring the effective integration of regional planning policies and national and regional transport policy. As part of the initial review process, submissions were invited and received from key transport agencies with responsibilities in the GDA including the Department of Transport, Dublin Transport Office, National Roads Authority, Dublin Airport Authority and Iarnrod Éireann1 and these comments contributed to the formulation of RPGs.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE INDEX the Title Index Alphabetically Lists the Exact Titles As Given on the Maps Cataloged in Parts One and Two
    TITLE INDEX The title index alphabetically lists the exact titles as given on the maps cataloged in Parts One and Two. Therefore, “A New Map of Ireland...” and “The New Map of Ireland...” are located in the title index under “A” and “T” respectively; a sixteenth-century map of “Vltonia” or “Vdrone” is found under “V”; and foreign titles such as “L’Irlanda” and “De Custen...” appear alphabetically under “L” and “D”. The title “Ireland,” as a single word, is found on over 220 maps in Parts One and Two. In the title index, therefore, “Ireland” has been further identified by both the name of the author in alphabetical order and publication date. A A Chart Of The Bay Of Galloway And River Shannon.....1457, 1458, 1459, 1460, 1461, 1462, 1463 A Chart of the Coasts of Ireland and Part of England.....208, 237, 239, 283, 287, 310, 327, 381, 384 A Chart of the East side of Ireland.....1604, 1606, 1610 A Chart Of The North-West Coast Of Ireland.....1725, 1726, 1727, 1728, 1729, 1730, 1731 A Chart Of The Sea-Coasts Of Ireland From Dublin To London-Derry.....1595, 1596, 1597, 1598, 1599, 1600, 1601 A Chart of the Southwest side of Ireland.....1662, 1663, 1664 A Chart Of The West and South-West Coast Of Ireland.....1702, 1703, 1704, 1714 A Chart of the West Coast of Ireland.....1681, 1684, 1695 A Compleat Chart Of The Coasts Of Ireland.....249 A Correct Chart of St. George's Channel and the Irish Sea... 271, 272 A Correct Chart of the Irish Sea.....1621 A Correct Map Of Ireland Divided into its Provinces, Counties, and Baronies.....231 A Discription
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Wicklow County Development Plan 2016-2022
    DRAFT Wicklow County Development Plan 2016-2022 CHAPTER 2 - VISION AND CORE STRATEGY 2.1 Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to set out the vision for the future of the County and to provide a ‘Core Strategy’ for its spatial organisation over the plan period. 2.2 Strategic Policy Context The Wicklow County Development Plan 2016-2022 (CDP) is consistent with higher order strategic policy documents including the ‘National Spatial Strategy 2002-2020’, the ‘Regional Planning Guidelines for the Greater Dublin Area 2010-2022’ and the National Transport Authority’s ‘Draft Transportation Strategy for the Greater Dublin Area 2011-2030’. While strictly speaking not a ‘higher order strategy’ document, in the crafting of the ‘Core Strategy’ for Wicklow, particular regard has also been taken of the Ministerial guidance ‘Rural Planning Guidelines for Planning Authorities’ (DoEHLG 2005), having regard to the mainly rural nature of the County. The strategic policies included in these documents are key to informing the ‘Core Strategy’ of the development plan. Other national plans, policies or strategies that influence the objectives of the development plan are considered within the main chapters of the development plan where they relate to a particular topic or land use. In addition, there are a number of environmental considerations that have a significant bearing on the overall development objectives of the plan. Under the Habitats and Birds Directive and the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive, both an Appropriate Assessment and a Strategic Environmental Assessment were carried out for the entire development plan including the written statement, maps, objectives and appendices. The plan had regard to both assessments with resultant changes being made to the Plan throughout the plan process.
    [Show full text]
  • Living in Dublin
    Living in Dublin in Ireland Contents Getting Started ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Applying for a PPS Number ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Opening a Bank Account .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Choosing a Local Mobile Phone Provider ................................................................................................................................. 3 Accommodation ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Utilities ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Dublin’s Postal Districts .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Rights and Obligations as a tenant in private rented accommodation .............................................................................. 6 Travel ..........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Roebuck Road, Clonskeagh, Dublin 14 GUIDE PRICE €775,000
    100 Roebuck Road, Clonskeagh, Dublin 14 GUIDE PRICE €775,000 W W W. B E S P O K E . I E FOR SALE BY PRIVATE TREATY DESCRIPTION Bespoke Estate Agents are delighted to present 100 UCD and it’s many sports facilities are adjacent to the Roebuck Road, a well proportioned 4 bedroom semi- property with a pedestrian entrance directly opposite 100 detached residence giving the new owners plenty of Roebuck Road. Deerpark Tennis Club and Elm Park Golf Club opportunity to further develop. The family home comes are also nearby. The area benefits from a host of amenities with the benefit of planning permission (planning ref: nearby including cafes and restaurants in Stillorgan and D18A/0946 granted November 2018). Clonskeagh. Dundrum Town Centre is only a 7 minute drive away while Blackrock and Donnybrook village are also local. The proposed works by Extend Architects lend an extra 124 SQ M of space and bring the total gross floor space to 239 The area is well serviced with transport. The QBC and SQ M. It includes the construction of a two storey extension Aircoach are nearby on the N11 and Windy Arbour Luas to the front, rear and side as well as an attic conversion. stop is a 5 minute drive and Booterstown DART station is The property after the proposed construction comprises 4 less than 10 minutes’ drive. double bedrooms with master ensuite as well as 2 further bathrooms. A spacious 20 metre lawn stretches out the The property briefly comprises: Porch to entrance, Light back. filled hallway leading to kitchen.
    [Show full text]
  • CAEE the Case for Agglomeration Economies in Europe
    CAEE The case for agglomeration economies in Europe Targeted Analysis 2013/2/1 Appendix C3: Dublin Case Study | 30 June 2010 1 This report presents case study results from the CAEE Targeted Analysis conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. © ESPON & University of Manchester, 2010. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. 2 List of authors Declan Curran Cian O Callaghan Delphine Ancien Chris van Egeraat, Justin Gleeson Brendan Bartley National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis (NIRSA) National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland Des McCafferty NIRSA Associate, Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick 3 Table of contents Introduction: page 5 Section 1: The Evolution of Metropolitan/City Regional Governance Arrangements In Dublin page 8 Section 2: The Economic Geography of Dublin page 13 Section 3: Review, Assessment and Conclusions page 35 4 1. GENERAL CONTEXT Introduction The Dublin case study report is one of the four city studies in the CAEE project.
    [Show full text]
  • Wicklow Local Economic and Community Plan (LECP) 2016-2022
    Wicklow Local Economic and Community Plan (LECP) 2016-2022 DRAFT Draft Version 00 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND PLAN FORMATION ....................................................................... 3 Introduction and background .............................................................................................................. 3 Purpose and Scope of Plan .................................................................................................................. 4 1. Policy Context .............................................................................................................................. 5 2 SUMMARY OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF COUNTY WICKLOW ......................................... 8 3 VISION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................... 16 Vision ................................................................................................................................................. 16 High Level Goals ................................................................................................................................. 17 4 SUPPORTING ACTIONS ................................................................................................................... 20 5 IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND REVIEW ........................................................................... 42 Implementation and Delivery Responsibilities .................................................................................
    [Show full text]