The Changing of the Praetorian Guard?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Changing of the Praetorian Guard? The Political Quarterly The Changing of the Praetorian Guard? The Size, Structure and Composition of the Labour Party’s National Executive Committee and the Enduring Importance of Labour’s Trade Unions CHRISTOPHER MASSEY Abstract This article investigates the history of the Labour Party’s National Executive Committee. It argues that the party’s trade unions, outside a brief period of left-wing NEC control between 1972 and 1981, formed a Praetorian Guard at the Executive around the party leader from Labour’s foundation until 1997, and have continued to serve in an enlarged Praetorian Guard since then. From 1900–97, the unions maintained effective control of over half of the NEC’s seats. Although widespread changes to the Executive in 1997 shifted the unions into a minority on the Committee, they continued to guard the leader. However, following the election of Jeremy Cor- byn in 2015, factional disputes led to a breakdown of the Praetorian Guard during heated battles for control of the NEC. Since this period, it is argued, Labour leaders have built new guards in which the unions continue to serve, but which also include soldiers from across the labour movement. Keywords: Labour Party, National Executive Committee, trade unions, Britain, the left LABOUR’S NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COM- seats thereafter. In 1964, Robert McKenzie MITTEE (NEC) is the governing body of the claimed that the unions acted as a ‘Praetorian party and the highest source of internal power Guard’ to protect the ‘parliamentary party for the leadership, trade unions and activists. from overt attempts by the “activist” element’, Control of the NEC is crucial for Labour but this was challenged in 1978 by Lewis Min- leaders and competition for places on the Exec- kin, at the height of the left’s ascendancy inside utive is fierce. This article argues that until the party.1 However, this article argues that 1997, the trade unions served as the Praetorian the Praetorian Guard reformed by the mid- Guard to the party leadership on the NEC, out- 1980s as the unions returned to their support- side a period of left-wing ascendancy between ive role, shielding the Labour leadership from 1972 and 1981. Owing to changes in the Execu- left-wing constituency opinion until 2015. tive’s structure in 1997, the unions shifted into Following the election of Jeremy Corbyn, a minority on the Committee, but largely con- both he and his successor have had to forge tinued to guard the leader. However, it is alliances from across Labour’s internal spec- argued that Labour’s ideological divides from trum. Between 2015 and 2020, prominent trade 2015 and further alterations to the NEC in union representatives at the NEC shifted to the 2016, 2017 and 2020, have forced Labour left to form a new alliance with left-wing con- leaders to cast their nets more widely in search stituency members at the Committee, as they of a majority at the party’s top table. had in the 1972–81 period, creating a compet- An NEC alliance between the party leader- ing centre of power to the parliamentary party. ship and the unions has afforded Labour leaders incredible stability for much of the 1R. McKenzie, British Political Parties, London, Mer- ’ party s history. The trade unions held a de facto cury Books, 1964, p. 597; L. Minkin, The Labour Party majority at the Executive from Labour’s foun- Conference, Manchester, Manchester University dation until 1997 and held one-third of the Press, 1986, p. 121. © 2021 The Author. The Political Quarterly published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Political Quarterly Publishing Co (PQPC). 1 This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Consequently, upon his election in 2020, Keir seats on the NEC and from this position served Starmer could no longer rely solely on the as the Praetorian Guard of the party’s leader- unions for a majority. Instead, Starmer and ship. This provided stability for party leaders his supporters built a new Praetorian Guard outside a period of left-wing ascendency from by breaking the left’s hold on the constituency 1972 to 1981. Between 1929 and 1997, the section alongside securing the support of unions directly appointed twelve union places some, but by no means all, trade union mem- and indirectly controlled a further six seats fi ’ bers at Labour’s top table. (the ve-seat women s section and the post of treasurer). These six places were elected at party conference where the union bloc vote Structural changes, 1900–2021 was worth 90 per cent of the conference total The NEC oversees the direction of the party, until 1993, and 70 per cent between 1993 and the manifesto, and the policy process, whilst 1995. This gave the unions a huge majority sub-committees of the Executive deal with dis- on the NEC, which featured only twenty-three – fi – cipline, the rulebook, and finances. As the (1918 29), twenty- ve (1929 37), twenty- – – party’s conference usually meets only once seven (1937 53), twenty-eight (1953 72), and – per year, the NEC is the key director of day- twenty-nine (1972 97) members, respectively. to-day operations. However, despite the sig- The non-union seats, before 1997, comprised fi – nificance of Labour’s Executive, examinations ve (1918 37) and then seven (from 1937) in a of the body’s role are mere footnotes in the constituency section, one each for the leader historiography of the party. Four excellent (from 1929) and deputy leader (from 1953), analyses do extend beyond this. Robert one from the socialist societies (from 1929), McKenzie, Martin Harrison, Lewis Minkin, and one from the Labour Party Young Social- and Meg Russell all devote chapters to the com- ists (LPYS) (from 1972). The constituency position, membership and work of the Execu- section was, from 1937, directly elected by tive, but these, in turn, only investigate the local party delegates. The left held a majority NEC between 1900 and 1953, 1935–59, 1956–60, in this section between 1952 and 1963, – 3 and 1979–2004, respectively.2 1967 89 and 2014 to date. ’ The NEC’s structure has changed through- The structure of Labour s Executive was ’ ‘ out its history, but at its core remains a mixture radically altered in 1997 under Blair s Partner- ’ of politicians, activists, and senior trade union ship in Power reforms. In this package, the members. The Committee traces its roots to the NEC was realigned with its membership Labour Representation Committee’s twelve- increasing to thirty-two. The unions lost their member Executive in 1900. In Labour’s 1918 majority on the Committee with the deletion fi ’ constitution, the NEC was enshrined as the of the ve-seat women s section and the addi- party’s ‘administration authority’ and its tion of three seats each for the PLP and membership was set at twenty-three members: Shadow Cabinet, alongside two seats for local thirteen from affiliated organisations, five con- government and a seat for the European Par- stituency representatives, four women, and a liamentary Labour Party (EPLP). A further treasurer. Although numbers on the NEC have seat was assigned in 1997 to the Black Socialist increased since 1918, the broad sections in Society when their membership reached 2,500. which members are elected and, crucially, the This occurred in 2007. ’ working majority of the trade unions, From 2015, Corbyn s leadership saw the remained largely consistent until Tony Blair’s NEC become a battleground between the ’ 1997 changes as shown in Tables 1 and 2. party s left and right. Constituency and trade ’ Between 1900 and 1997 the trade unions union support for Corbyn s leadership controlled the appointment of a majority of allowed him to build a fragile majority. Yet, tweaks to the Executive’s structure were made 2McKenzie, British Political Parties, pp. 516–531; M. Harrison, Trade Unions and the Labour Party since 3P. Seyd, The Rise and Fall of the Labour Left, Basing- 1945, London, George Allen and Unwin, 1960, stoke, Macmillan, 1987, p. 207; P. Seyd, The Labour pp. 307–323; L. Minkin, Labour Party Conference, Left, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Shef- pp. 242–70; M. Russell, Building New Labour, Basing- field, 1986, p. 63; Labour Party, Conference Reports, stoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 172–89. London, Labour Party, 1952–1990. 2CHRISTOPHER M ASSEY The Political Quarterly © 2021 The Author. The Political Quarterly published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Political Quarterly Publishing Co (PQPC). in 2016 and 2017. In 2016, seats for the Scottish 1 and Welsh Labour Parties increased the size of the Executive to thirty-five, with these appointments wrestling control of the NEC away from Corbyn. In 2017, the left reclaimed their grip over the Executive with the addition of one trade union and three constituency places, taking the number of members to thirty-nine. In 2021, as shown in Table 2, the NEC continues to have thirty-nine seats with the EPLP seat replaced by a new disability rep- resentative in November 2020. The NEC before 1970 1122 Despite left-wing dominance of the constitu- ency section in the 1950s and 1960s, a change of attitude in the union section was required to alter the political balance of the NEC and 55777 45555 to break the Pretorian Guard. Before 1956, no major trade union leader supported the left until Frank Cousins was elected as General Secretary of the Transport and General Workers Union (TGWU). However, by the 111111 mid-1960s, the previously loyal unions were beginning to slowly shift away from the lead- ership.
Recommended publications
  • The News-Sentinel 1959
    The News-Sentinel 1959 Friday, January 2, 1959 Oliver H. Heckaman Oliver E. HECKAMAN, 73, R.R. 3, Argos, died at 1:40 p.m. Thursday at Parkview hospital, Plymouth, where he had been a patient since suffering a heart attack six days earlier. Mr. Heckaman, a farmer who had spent his entire life in Marshall county was born near Bremen, Oct. 3, 1885, the son of Samuel and Saraj BROCKER HECKAMAN. He had lived in Bremen, LaPaz and Argos. He was first married in 1904 to Chloe B. JONES, who died in 1944. In 1946 Mr. Heckaman was maried to Lois SWOVERLAND, who survives. Other survivors include three daughers, Mrs. Frank (Inez) THOMAS, LaPaz, and Mrs. Roger (Hope) WINTERS and Mrs. Glenn (Mary) STAFFORD, both of Portland, Ore.; four sons, William [HECKAMAN], Portland, Ore.; Herbert and David [HECKAMAN] of Lakeville and Oliver [HECKAMAN], Jr., Plymouth; fourteen grandchildren; eight great-grandchildren; three step-daughters, Mrs. Betty MAST, Nappanee, Mrs. Meril (Dorothy) OVERMYER, Plymouth, and Miss Margaret SWOVERLAND, at home; a stepson, Donald SWOVERLAND, at home; two step-grandchildren; a sister, Mrs. Ralph HUFF, Bremen, and two brothers, Monroe [HECKAMAN], Etna Green, and Charles [HECKAMAN], Beech, N.D. Services will be conducted at 2 p.m. Sunday by the Rev. Lester CLEVELAND of the Santa Anna Methodist church at the Grossman funeral home, Argos, where friends may call after 7 p.m. today. Burial will be in New Oak Hill cemetery, Plymouth. Martha V. Atkinson Fulton county’s 1959 traffic toll leaped to one killed and at least six injured Thursday, before the New Year was even a day old.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Business Forum Programme
    Join us in March for a series of events with our Frontbench politicians including Keir Starmer, Anneliese Dodds, Ed Miliband, Bridget Phillipson, Rachel Reeves, Emily Thornberry, Chi Onwurah, Lucy Powell, Pat McFadden, Jim McMahon and many others. Monday 8 march 2021 8am – 8.50am Breakfast Anneliese Dodds ‘In Conversation with’ Helia Ebrahimi, Ch4 Economics correspondent, and audience Q and A Supported by The City of London Corporation with introductory video from Catherine McGuinness 9am - 10.30am Breakout roundtables: Three choices of topics lasting 30 minutes each Theme: Economic recovery: Building an economy for the future 1. Lucy Powell – Industrial policy after Covid 2. Bridget Phillipson, James Murray – The future of business economic support 3. Ed Miliband, Matt Pennycook – Green economic recovery 4. Pat McFadden, Abena Oppong-Asare – What kind of recovery? 5. Emily Thornberry, Bill Esterson – Boosting British business overseas 6. Kate Green, Toby Perkins – Building skills for a post Covid economy 10:30 - 11.00am Break 11.00 - 12.00pm Panel discussion An Inclusive Economic Recovery panel, with Anneliese Dodds Chair: Claire Bennison, Head of ACCA UK Anneliese Dodds, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer Mary-Ann Stephenson, Director of the Women’s Budget Group Miatta Fahnbulleh, Chief Executive of the New Economics Foundation Rachel Bleetman, ACCA Policy and Research Manager Rain Newton-Smith, Chief Economist, CBI Supported by ACCA 14245_21 Reproduced from electronic media, promoted by David Evans, General Secretary, the Labour Party,
    [Show full text]
  • National Policy Forum (NPF) Report 2018
    REPORT 2018 @LabPolicyForum #NPFConsultation2018 National Policy Forum Report 2018 XX National Policy Forum Report 2018 Contents NPF Elected Officers ....................................................................................................................4 Foreword ........................................................................................................................................5 About this document ...................................................................................................................6 Policy Commission Annual Reports Early Years, Education and Skills ............................................................................................7 Economy, Business and Trade ............................................................................................. 25 Environment, Energy and Culture ....................................................................................... 39 Health and Social Care ........................................................................................................... 55 Housing, Local Government and Transport ..................................................................... 71 International ............................................................................................................................. 83 Justice and Home Affairs ....................................................................................................... 99 Work, Pensions and Equality ..............................................................................................119
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence
    1 Written evidence 1. Emailed complaint sent to the Commissioner, 22 January 2019 [Redacted – text about third party] Please will you investigate the possible breach of the Parliamentary Standards by Ms Kate Osamor MP when she wrote to the presiding judge at Bournemouth Crown Court last autumn in support of her son, [name redacted] facing criminal charges. Did Ms Osamor attempt to influence the Court’s decision by using her parliamentary position? 22 January 2019 2. Letter from Ms Kate Osamor MP to the Commissioner, 22 January 2019 I understand that the current rules for the use of stationery and postage-paid envelopes are that, as an MP, I may use these for ‘modest personal use’ [hyperlink]. My understanding is that this also includes using Commons letterheads in court and tribunal proceedings, which I do frequently in support of my constituents’ cases. I also use Commons’ letterheaded stationery for character references for my staff. I recently used House stationery to write a character reference in a court case involving my son, who is employed in my office, and seek clarification from your office that I have not breached any of the rules for using parliamentary stationery in this instance. I look forward to hearing from you. 22 January 2019 3. Letter from the Commissioner to Ms Kate Osamor MP, 23 January 2019 Thank you for your letter of 22 January 2019. You said you were writing to seek“ clarification from [my] office that[you] have not breached any of the rules for using parliamentary stationery….”. I am not able to give any opinion on that point without first having established all the relevant facts.
    [Show full text]
  • State, Local Crime Rate Down; Violent Crimes up by PHIL ATTINGER STAFF WRITER
    HIGHLANDS NEWS-SUN Monday, June 28, 2021 VOL. 102 | NO. 179 | $1.00 YOUR HOMETOWN NEWSPAPER SINCE 1919 An Edition Of The Sun Scooters popular; some stolen Andrews: Fail safes help find, recover lost Birds By PHIL ATTINGER There have been some, module that runs and charges had taken apart the electric STAFF WRITER however, who haven’t used them. module on the handle bars, them properly. Andrews said So far, two were recovered, Polk Sheriff’s officials said. SEBRING — The popular a handful of the scooters have from Lorida and Avon Park, Deputies there recovered the Bird Scooter has given people “walked off.” Andrews said. Another was scooter and informed the shopping in Sebring’s down- About seven users took recovered by the Polk County Sebring Police Department, COURTESY GRAPHIC/DAN town area a quicker way to visit vehicles out of Community Sheriff’s Office after Dan which had the original theft FEATHERS shops, using the electric-motor Redevelopment Agency District Feathers, who assists Andrews report. two-wheeled vehicles to get and never returned them. in managing the fleet, tracked The remaining three scooters If you want to take a Bird Scooter them around faster than their “They’re no good outside a missing one to an address ended up on the bottom of outside the downtown area, you can feet can take them. downtown,” Andrews said. off State Road 60, west of Lake Lake Jackson, no longer usable. if you hug the shores of Lake Jackson, “They are a really small That hasn’t stopped some Wales. Any permanently disabled as seen from the Bird mobile app compact scooter, think of a people from trying to make the Officials with the Polk County scooter is a $1,200 loss, which also shows some of the nearest little child’s Razor scooter, but public transit option a personal Sheriff said they found the Andrews said.
    [Show full text]
  • View Call Lists: Westminster Hall PDF File 0.05 MB
    Issued on: 6 July at 4.20pm Call lists for Westminster Hall Wednesday 7 July 2021 A list of Members, both virtually and physically present, selected to participate in Westminster Hall debates. All Members wishing to speak in the debate must be present from the beginning of the debate. For 30-minute debates, debates are led by the Member in charge and responded to by the Minister. Members may attend to intervene or make a short speech. Members wishing to make a speech should follow existing conventions about contacting the Member in charge of the debate, the Speaker’s Office ([email protected]) and the Minister. If sittings are suspended for divisions in the House, additional time is added. Call lists are compiled and published incrementally as information becomes available. For the most up-to-date information see the parliament website: https://commonsbusiness.parliament.uk/ CONTENTS 1. Future of regional airports 1 2. Immigration Rules and highly skilled migrants 2 3. Delays in the asylum system 2 4. UK casino industry 3 5. Eligibility for Government support during the covid-19 outbreak 3 FUTURE OF REGIONAL AIRPORTS 9.25am to 10.55am Order Member Party Virtual/ Physical 1 Steve Double (St Austell and Conservative Physical Member in Charge Newquay) 2 Conor McGinn (St Helens North) Labour Physical 3 Cherilyn Mackrory (Truro and Conservative Virtual Falmouth) 4 Jamie Stone (Caithness, Sutherland Lib Dem Virtual and Easter Ross) 5 Alun Cairns (Vale of Glamorgan) Conservative Physical 2 Call lists for Westminster Hall Wednesday
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Staff Register
    REGISTER OF INTERESTS OF MEMBERS’ SECRETARIES AND RESEARCH ASSISTANTS (As at 15 October 2020) INTRODUCTION Purpose and Form of the Register In accordance with Resolutions made by the House of Commons on 17 December 1985 and 28 June 1993, holders of photo-identity passes as Members’ secretaries or research assistants are in essence required to register: ‘Any occupation or employment for which you receive over £410 from the same source in the course of a calendar year, if that occupation or employment is in any way advantaged by the privileged access to Parliament afforded by your pass. Any gift (eg jewellery) or benefit (eg hospitality, services) that you receive, if the gift or benefit in any way relates to or arises from your work in Parliament and its value exceeds £410 in the course of a calendar year.’ In Section 1 of the Register entries are listed alphabetically according to the staff member’s surname. Section 2 contains exactly the same information but entries are instead listed according to the sponsoring Member’s name. Administration and Inspection of the Register The Register is compiled and maintained by the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Anyone whose details are entered on the Register is required to notify that office of any change in their registrable interests within 28 days of such a change arising. An updated edition of the Register is published approximately every 6 weeks when the House is sitting. Changes to the rules governing the Register are determined by the Committee on Standards in the House of Commons, although where such changes are substantial they are put by the Committee to the House for approval before being implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On Parliamentary Representation)
    House of Commons Speaker's Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) Session 2008–09 Volume II Written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 April 2009 HC 167 -II Published on 27 May 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Speaker’s Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) The Conference secretariat will be able to make individual submissions available in large print or Braille on request. The Conference secretariat can be contacted on 020 7219 0654 or [email protected] On 12 November 2008 the House of Commons agreed to establish a new committee, to be chaired by the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Michael Martin MP and known as the Speaker's Conference. The Conference has been asked to: "Consider, and make recommendations for rectifying, the disparity between the representation of women, ethnic minorities and disabled people in the House of Commons and their representation in the UK population at large". It may also agree to consider other associated matters. The Speaker's Conference has until the end of the Parliament to conduct its inquiries. Current membership Miss Anne Begg MP (Labour, Aberdeen South) (Vice-Chairman) Ms Diane Abbott MP (Labour, Hackney North & Stoke Newington) John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Mr David Blunkett MP (Labour, Sheffield, Brightside) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton & Honiton) Mr Ronnie Campbell MP (Labour, Blyth Valley) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) Mr Parmjit Dhanda MP (Labour, Gloucester) Andrew George MP (Liberal Democrat, St Ives) Miss Julie Kirkbride MP (Conservative, Bromsgrove) Dr William McCrea MP (Democratic Unionist, South Antrim) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith & The Border) Fiona Mactaggart MP (Labour, Slough) Mr Khalid Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham Perry Barr) Anne Main MP (Conservative, St Albans) Jo Swinson MP (Liberal Democrat, East Dunbartonshire) Mrs Betty Williams MP (Labour, Conwy) Publications The Reports and evidence of the Conference are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadow Cabinet Meetings with Proprietors, Editors and Senior Media Executives
    Shadow Cabinet Meetings 1 June 2015 – 31 May 2016 Shadow cabinet meetings with proprietors, editors and senior media executives. Andy Burnham MP Shadow Secretary of State’s meetings with proprietors, editors and senior media executives Date Name Location Purpose Nature of relationship* 26/06/2015 Alison Phillips, Editor, Roast, The General Professional Sunday People Floral Hall, discussion London, SE1 Peter Willis, Editor, 1TL Daily Mirror 15/07/2015 Lloyd Embley, Editor in J Sheekey General Professional Chief, Trinity Mirror Restaurant, discussion 28-32 Saint Peter Willis, Editor, Martin's Daily Mirror Court, London WC2N 4AL 16/07/2015 Kath Viner, Editor in King’s Place Guardian daily Professional Chief, Guardian conference 90 York Way meeting London N1 2AP 22/07/2015 Evgeny Lebedev, Private General Professional proprieter, address discussion Independent/Evening Standard 04/08/2015 Lloyd Embley, Editor in Grosvenor General Professional Chief, Trinity Mirror Hotel, 101 discussion Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 0SJ 16/05/2016 Eamonn O’Neal, Manchester General Professional Managing Editor, Evening Manchester Evening News, discussion News Mitchell Henry House, Hollinwood Avenue, Chadderton, Oldham OL9 8EF Other interaction between Shadow Secretary of State and proprietors, editors and senior media executives Date Name Location Purpose Nature of relationship* No such meetings Angela Eagle MP Shadow Secretary of State’s meetings with proprietors, editors and senior media executives Date Name Location Purpose Nature of relationship* No
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways to Politics
    Equality and Human Rights Commission Research report 65 Pathways to politics Catherine Durose, Francesca Gains, Liz Richardson, Ryan Combs, Karl Broome and Christina Eason De Montfort University and University of Manchester Pathways to politics Catherine Durose, Francesca Gains, Liz Richardson, Ryan Combs, Karl Broome and Christina Eason De Montfort University and University of Manchester © Equality and Human Rights Commission 2011 First published Spring 2011 ISBN 978 1 84206 326 2 EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT SERIES The Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series publishes research carried out for the Commission by commissioned researchers. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission. The Commission is publishing the report as a contribution to discussion and debate. Please contact the Research team for further information about other Commission research reports, or visit our website: Research Team Equality and Human Rights Commission Arndale House The Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0161 829 8500 Website: www.equalityhumanrights.com You can download a copy of this report as a PDF from our website: www.equalityhumanrights.com If you require this publication in an alternative format, please contact the Communications Team to discuss your needs at: [email protected] Contents Page Tables and figures i Acknowledgements ii Executive summary v 1. Background 1 1.1 Why is diversity in representation important? 2 1.2 Scope of the research 3 1.3 Researching diversity and inter-sectionality 4 1.4 Self-identification and representation 5 1.5 Understanding barriers and pathways 6 1.6 Chronically excluded groups 7 1.7 Structure of the report 8 2.
    [Show full text]