Reconnaissance Geology Geophysics, and Geochemistry of the Southeastern Part of the Lewis and Clark Range, Montana
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Dearborn River High Bridge other name/site number: 24LC130 2. Location street & number: Fifteen Miles Southwest of Augusta on Bean Lake Road not for publication: n/a vicinity: X city/town: Augusta state: Montana code: MT county: Lewis & Clark code: 049 zip code: 59410 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X_ nomination _ request for detenj ination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the proc urf I and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X_ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criterfi commend thatthis oroperty be considered significant _ nationally X statewide X locafly. Signa jre of oertifying officialn itle Date Montana State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency or bureau (_ See continuation sheet for additional comments. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification , he/eby certify that this property is: 'entered in the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined not eligible for the National Register_ _ see continuation sheet _ removed from the National Register _see continuation sheet _ other (explain): _________________ Dearborn River High Bridge Lewis & Clark County. -
Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air
Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air Canada (Alberta – VE6/VA6) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S87.1 Issue number 2.2 Date of issue 1st August 2016 Participation start date 1st October 2012 Authorised Association Manager Walker McBryde VA6MCB Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged Page 1 of 63 Document S87.1 v2.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) 1 Change Control ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Association Reference Data ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Programme derivation ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 General information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Rights of way and access issues ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Maps and navigation .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Safety considerations .................................................................................................................. -
(Ca. 1.45 Ga), WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: PSEUDOFOSSILS, FACIES, TIDES and SYNDEPOSITIONAL TECTONIC ACTIVITY in a MESOPROTEROZOIC INTRACRATONIC BASIN
SEDIMENTARY, MICROBIAL AND DEFORMATION FEATURES IN THE LOWER BELT SUPERGROUP (ca. 1.45 Ga), WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: PSEUDOFOSSILS, FACIES, TIDES AND SYNDEPOSITIONAL TECTONIC ACTIVITY IN A MESOPROTEROZOIC INTRACRATONIC BASIN A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Geological Sciences University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Roy Gregory Rule © Copyright Roy Gregory Rule, July, 2020. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other uses of materials in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Geological Sciences Geology Building University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2, Canada Or Dean College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5C9, Canada i ABSTRACT Sedimentary, microbial and deformation features in the lower Belt Supergroup (ca. -
Evolution of the Cordilleran Foreland Basin System in Northwestern Montana, U.S.A
Evolution of the Cordilleran foreland basin system in northwestern Montana, U.S.A. Facundo Fuentes†, Peter G. DeCelles, Kurt N. Constenius, and George E. Gehrels Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA ABSTRACT episode of marine inundation and black shale 1989; Fermor and Moffat, 1992; Stockmal et al., deposition (Marias River Shale) occurred be- 1992; Beaumont et al., 1993; Plint et al., 1993; New lithostratigraphic and chronostrati- tween the Cenomanian and mid-Santonian, Ross et al., 2005; Miall et al., 2008; Yang and graphic, geochronologic, and sedimentary and was followed by a regressive succession Miall, 2009). This bimodal focus was mainly petrologic data illuminate the history of represented by the Upper Santonian–mid- driven by either the presence of anomalously development of the North American Cor- Campanian Telegraph Creek, Virgelle, and good surface exposures, as in the case of the dilleran foreland basin system and adjacent Two Medicine Formations. Provenance data western interior United States, or by hydro- thrust belt from Middle Jurassic through do not resolve the timing of individual thrust carbon exploration and a large subsurface data- Eocene time in northwestern Montana. The displacements during Cenomanian–early base, as in Canada (Miall et al., 2008). The oldest deposits in the foreland basin system Campanian time. The Upper Campanian ~300-km-long segment of the foreland basin consist of relatively thin, regionally tabu- Bearpaw Formation represents the last major lying within and east of the Cordilleran belt in lar deposits of the marine Ellis Group and marine inundation in the foreland basin . By northwestern Montana remains comparatively fl uvial-estuarine Morrison Formation, which latest Campanian time, a major epi sode of poorly understood in terms of its stratigraphy, accumulated during Bajocian to Kimmerid- slip on the Lewis thrust system had com- basin evolution, and relationship with the kine- gian time. -
The Future of Stream Access in Montana
2017 The Best in the West: Stream Access in Montana Public Land/Water Access Association High Water by Mary J. Maxam By Brent Zundel For the Public Land/Water Access Association April 2017 Keeping the public on public lands and waters Overview Montana’s Stream Access Law is widely considered “the best in the west,” arguably the strongest law in the nation in terms of ensuring public access. In short, the public can access any river or stream capable of being used for recreation between the high-water marks, regardless of the navigability of the river or the ownership of the streambed and adjacent property, as long as the user avoids trespass in order to reach the stream. This document provides a history of stream access in Montana, beginning with the original conflicts on the Dearborn and Beaverhead Rivers and continuing to the recently decided battles over access at bridges and the most recent challenge to the Stream Access Law. Early conflicts in the late 1970s and early 1980s led to the groundbreaking Curran The Yellowstone River flows through Paradise Valley, south of Livingston, and Hildreth cases in the Montana. Photo courtesy Brent Zundel Montana Supreme Court. These cases laid the foundation for the groundbreaking 1985 Stream Access Law, which codifies the strong public access rights enjoyed by all Montanans today. Immediately upon passage of the law, it was challenged in district courts, the state supreme court, and even appealed to the federal level. It has withstood all challenges. In the past decade, those fighting against public access have shifted to focus on stream access at bridges, with much of the controversy centering on the iconic Ruby River. -
Glaciers of the Canadian Rockies
Glaciers of North America— GLACIERS OF CANADA GLACIERS OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES By C. SIMON L. OMMANNEY SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD Edited by RICHARD S. WILLIAMS, Jr., and JANE G. FERRIGNO U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1386–J–1 The Rocky Mountains of Canada include four distinct ranges from the U.S. border to northern British Columbia: Border, Continental, Hart, and Muskwa Ranges. They cover about 170,000 km2, are about 150 km wide, and have an estimated glacierized area of 38,613 km2. Mount Robson, at 3,954 m, is the highest peak. Glaciers range in size from ice fields, with major outlet glaciers, to glacierets. Small mountain-type glaciers in cirques, niches, and ice aprons are scattered throughout the ranges. Ice-cored moraines and rock glaciers are also common CONTENTS Page Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J199 Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------- 199 FIGURE 1. Mountain ranges of the southern Rocky Mountains------------ 201 2. Mountain ranges of the northern Rocky Mountains ------------ 202 3. Oblique aerial photograph of Mount Assiniboine, Banff National Park, Rocky Mountains----------------------------- 203 4. Sketch map showing glaciers of the Canadian Rocky Mountains -------------------------------------------- 204 5. Photograph of the Victoria Glacier, Rocky Mountains, Alberta, in August 1973 -------------------------------------- 209 TABLE 1. Named glaciers of the Rocky Mountains cited in the chapter -
Upper Sun River Drainage Basin Origin Determined by Topographic Map Interpretation Techniques: Lewis and Clark and Teton Counties, Montana, USA
Open Journal of Geology, 2019, 9, 257-277 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojg ISSN Online: 2161-7589 ISSN Print: 2161-7570 Upper Sun River Drainage Basin Origin Determined by Topographic Map Interpretation Techniques: Lewis and Clark and Teton Counties, Montana, USA Eric Clausen Independent Researcher, Jenkintown, PA How to cite this paper: Clausen, E. (2019) Abstract Upper Sun River Drainage Basin Origin Determined by Topographic Map Inter- A new and fundamentally different regional geomorphology paradigm in pretation Techniques: Lewis and Clark and which massive south- and southeast-oriented meltwater floods flowed across Teton Counties, Montana, USA. Open the entire Missouri River drainage basin is tested by interpreting detailed to- Journal of Geology, 9, 257-277. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2019.95018 pographic maps of the Montana upper Sun River drainage basin region by trying to explain origins of previously unexplained or poorly explained ero- Received: April 8, 2019 sional landforms located upstream from Sun River Canyon (which cuts across Accepted: May 11, 2019 Montana’s north-to-south oriented Sawtooth Range). Mountain passes, Published: May 14, 2019 through valleys, and other drainage divide low points along what are today Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and high mountain ridges, including the North American east-west continental Scientific Research Publishing Inc. divide, are interpreted to be evidence of drainage routes that once crossed the This work is licensed under the Creative region. These drainage divide crossings suggest -
Helena and Lewis & Clark National Forests Forest Plan Assessment
Helena and Lewis & Clark National Forests Forest Plan Assessment Appendix C, Scenery 2015 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Scenic Character ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Scenic Integrity .............................................................................................................................. 1 Big Belts Geographic Area .............................................................................................................................. 2 Location ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Scenic Character ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Scenic Integrity ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Castles Geographic Area ................................................................................................................................. 9 Location ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Scenic Character ........................................................................................................................................ -
Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Lewis and Clark National Forest-Administered Land
Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Lewis and Clark National Forest-Administered Land Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Abandoned-Inactive Mines Program Open-File Report MBMG 413 Phyllis A. Hargrave Michael D. Kerschen Geno W. Liva Jeffrey D. Lonn Catherine McDonald John J. Metesh Robert Wintergerst Prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Region 1 Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Lewis and Clark National Forest-Administered Land Open-File Report MBMG 413 Reformatted for .pdf April 2000 Phyllis A. Hargrave Michael D. Kerschen Geno W. Liva Jeffrey D. Lonn Catherine McDonald John J. Metesh Robert Wintergerst Prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Region 1 Contents Page List of Figures ............................................................. iv List of Tables .............................................................. vi Introduction ...............................................................1 1.1 Project Objectives ..................................................1 1.2 Abandoned and Inactive Mines Defined ..................................2 1.3 Health and Environmental Problems at Mines ..............................2 1.3.1 Acid-Mine Drainage .........................................3 1.3.2 Solubilities of Selected Metals ..................................4 1.3.3 The Use of pH and SC to Identify Problems ........................5 1.4 Methodology ......................................................6 1.4.1 Data Sources ...............................................6 1.4.2 Pre-Field Screening -
State of the Crown of the Continent Ecosystem: Transboundary Bioregion
State of the Crown of The Continent Ecosystem: Transboundary Bioregion STATE OF THE CROWN OF THE CONTINENT ECOSYSTEM: Flathead/Castle Transboundary Bioregion - DRAFT - Flathead Transboundary Network January 1999 For additional copies of this report, comments or review, please contact: Miistakis Institute for the Rockies c/o Biological Sciences University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada Phone: 403/220-8968 Email: [email protected] Also available online at: http://www.rockies.ca Copyright (c) 1998 Flathead Transboundary Network. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, photocopying, electronic, mechanical, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of a copyright holder. State of the Crown of the Continent Ecosystem: Transboundary Bioregion I This work is a collaborative effort of members of the Flathead Transboundary Network. Founded in January 1998, the FTN is a network of government agencies, scientists and NGOs seeking innovative ecosystem-based solutions to transboundary issues in the Rocky Mountain region of Montana, B.C. and Alberta Authors: Erica Konrad, Brian Peck, Andrea Stewart, Craig Stewart General Editor: Craig Stewart Maps: Andrew Harries This work has been generously funded by the Kendall Foundation, the Fanwood Foundation and the Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network CITATION: Flathead Transboundary Network. 1999. State of the Crown of the Continent Ecosystem: Flathead/ Castle Transboundary Region (Draft). Calgary: Miistakis Institute for the Rockies. State of the Crown of the Continent Ecosystem: Transboundary Bioregion II Table of Contents Chapter 1: A transboundary ecosystem...............1 a) Introduction .................................................................................................................1 The political context: ............................................................................................................................. -
The Lewis Thrust Fault and Related Structures in the Disturbed Belt, Northwestern Montana
The Lewis Thrust Fault and Related Structures in the Disturbed Belt, Northwestern Montana G E 0 L 0 G I CAL SURVEY P R 0 FE S S I 0 N A L PAPER ll74 The Lewis Thrust Fault and Related Structures in the Disturbed Belt, Northwestern Montana By MELVILLE R. MUDGE and ROBERT L. EARHART GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1174 M ajar structures reflect large-scale easterly displacement of early Tertiary age UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON:l980 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Mudge, Melville Rhodes, 1921- The Lewis thrust fault and related structures in the disturbed belt, northwestern Montana. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 11 74) Bibliography: p. 17 Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:1174 1. Faults (Geology)-Montana. 2. Geology-Montana. I. Earhart, Robert L., joint author. II. Title. III. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1174. QE606.5.U6M82 551.8'7'09786 80-607023 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washinton, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Geology ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Lewis thrust fault ..................................................................................................................................... -
Mountain Views Vol. 9, No. 2
Mountain Views Chronicles of the Consortium for Integrated Climate Research in Western Mountains CIRMOUNT Informing the Mountain Research Community Volume 9, Number 2 • December 2015 Ice calving from the terminus cliffs of Canada Glacier, McMurdo Dry Valley, Antarctica. Photo: Hassan Basagic. Front Cover: Snow on Canisp and Suilven, Lochinver [Scotland]. © Amy Holden (Woolvin) Editor: Connie Millar, USDA Forest Service, Pacifi c Southwest Research Station, Albany, California Layout and Graphic Design: Diane Delany, USDA Forest Service, Pacifi c Southwest Research Station, Albany, California Back Cover: Old Man of Storr from Applecross Peninsula [Scotland]. © Amy Holden (Woolvin) Read about the contributing artists on page 97. Mountain Views Chronicles of the Consortium for Integrated Climate Research in Western Mountains CIRMOUNT Volume 9, No 2, December 2015 www.fs.fed.us/psw/cirmount/ Table of Contents Editor's Introduction Connie Millar and Erin Gleeson 1 Guest Editorial Harald Bugmann 2 Brevia Quantifying Snow Duration under Diverse Susan Dickerson-Lange 4 Forest Canopies On Underestimation of Global Vulnerability to Tree Mortality and Craig Allen, David Breshears, and Nate McDowell 9 Forest Die-Off from Hotter Drought in the Anthropocene Placing the 2012–2015 California-Nevada Drought Ben Hatchett 13 into a Paleoclimatic Context Articles Glacial Research Investigations of Cirque Glaciation, Sierra Nevada, California Doug Clark 17 Vanishing Ice, Vanishing History Greg Stock 22 Rock Glaciers of the American West Andrew Fountain and Gunnar Johnson 27 Glacier Views through Time: An Update from the Glacier Hassan Basagic and Andrew Fountain 30 RePhoto Project Th e Perth III Conference: Mountains of our Future Earth Perth III Overview Martin Price 33 Session Syntheses: African Mountains and their Challenges V.