Pibor UNMISS Adjacent Area Flow Monitoring Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pibor UNMISS Adjacent Area Flow Monitoring Summary Pibor UNMISS Adjacent Area IOM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX SOUTH SUDAN Flow Monitoring Summary (7–18 August 2020) Overview The first half of 2020 was marked by an escalation in sub-national and localized violence throughout Although attacking groups have largely retreated to their communities, the impacts of the conflict the country and Jonglei State and the Greater Pibor Administrative Area (GPAA) have been major in the first half of the year continue to be deeply felt by local populations. According to PLAN hotspots for such violence. Since early 2020, there has been renewed displacement, attacks on International and the NNGO, CIDO a total of 33,668 Individuals (11,443 households) were humanitarian supplies and personnel and civilian abuses in central and southern parts of Jonglei, as registered in early August 2020 at the UNMISS Adjacent Area (AA) and several spontaneous well as lowland Pibor. Following the large-scale attack on Pieri in Uror County on 16 May 2020, displacement sites throughout Pibor Town. Nearly all households are reported to have returned groups of armed youth launched an assault on key areas around Pibor, which was met by a series to Lekuangole and Gumruk by the end of the same month. UNMISS Pibor AA housed 403 of counter attacks throughout June. Violence continued into July and August, with tensions spilling individuals according to a DTM headcount conducted on 7 August 2020. Access constraints over into neighbouring parts of the country. rendered assessments beyond Pibor Town challenging, limiting available data to the town. In June 2020, President Salva Kiir established a high-level committee to address conflict, but The humanitarian response has been disrupted, further eroding people’s ability to meet their basic mistrust between groups remains high, due in part to the persistence of unaddressed grievances needs, which has been compounded by the destruction of civilian property and livelihoods and connected to the long history of violence in the area. loss of livestock during recurrent fighting, as well as flooding. While heavy rain could temper the possibility of further violence, the potential for additional violent incidents in Jonglei State and the GPAA, still exists. Spontaneous Displacement Sites in Pibor* Locations of departure by number of persons R r . A o b t i a la P l r SUDAN . a bo R R . ko Pibor Town ch r-A Akobo A o o g P B w - e r Displacement Sites o i b R i . Uror R K P . ETHIOPIA ± S o Residential Area h n ± w g a - Hai Kandako K Gadiang l !( Rivers L Kondako Primary School Jonglei o n Ajwara i SOUTH SUDAN !( ku g Talo Ngawalem !( Roads a Lekuangole n g o ) Pochalla l u Buildings e a - L A ( i ko n Hai Jalaba East e KENYA b r DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO G . o o UGANDAR Kongor !( alla b Poch i Pibor- P Lukriyang Hai Jalaba West . Kelo !( R Individuals Pibor Town Hai Chok 16,579 County of Interest Bolotinganu !( Boma-Pibor Pibor Boys Primary School 16,580 - 17,089 State of Interest Lawol Jonglei !( Pibor Girls Primary School ! ( !( Rivers Settlements at Gumuruk az Pibor UNMISS AA !( Dorat el Roads County Dorein!( . L Hai MuderiaPibor !( R Bolotifor erru !( R . G . R R G . e K r an Gumuruk ru Thambet ge Hai Mattar n R Bor South . Pibor K a Hai JackorLankachod n bor g r-Pi e r Bo n Walichmar o B t b Werngueny a i o !( P m a z l a - a l r l - i o P t e B B ib o L o o L . r . r R Kavachoch - R R. Lotilla P ib Pengko o Anyidi !( r !( K K a im sa o n to g n R. K g o ange - r n B - Langachot Primary School o B r ia Pariak t !( R *Excluding an area near the Pibor MSF compound near the Pibor *Excluding an area . S R u . p i N r i a r n ( B o e a Central Equatoria Disclaimer: This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries h g Disclaimer: This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries 0 15 30 60 0 1,100 2,200 r R. Sitiri n e l Kilometers on this map no not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Meters - a on thJ is mTaep rneo kneotk imaply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. e i Kassangor b K Lafon ir !( e it . l S ) . R Eastern Equatoria R For more information, please contact DTM South Sudan at [email protected] or visit displacement.iom.int/south-sudan SUDAN Pibor UNMISS Adjacent Area ETHIOPIA Jonglei IOM DISPLACEMENT SOUTH SUDAN TRACKING MATRIX CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC SOUTH SUDAN Flow Monitoring Summary (7–18 August 2020) KENYA DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO UGANDA Camp Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) In response to the influxes, and in close coordination with the CCCM Cluster and OCHA, a CCCM also undertook a governance mapping exercise and mobilized IDP Community Leaders CCCM surge team – comprising of Cluster and Partner Coordination, Community Engagement for information sharing meetings. At the same time, the CCCM site planner conducted a flood and a Technical Specialist – were deployed to the four Collective Centres and Pibor AA Site assessment in the AA site and the collective centres to ascertain for the site works needed to in order to coordinate lifesaving services through partner coordination, advocacy, and liaison; upgrade the drainage system and mitigate against flooding. In the interim, following a significant service monitoring; engineering assessment and support; and community governance. number of departures from the site witnessed by the flow monitoring points due to heavy rains that caused flooding within site, a lack of services and advocacy from community leaders During the response, the CCCM team engaged with the OCHA Deep Field Coordinator and and local authorities to leave the site and collective centres providing relative stabilization of local authorities represented by RRC and Chief Administrator of GPAA to identify gaps and the situation in areas of origin, the team is engaging with OCHA and relevant partner for a address humanitarian needs in the area. In addition, the CCCM team supported the OCHA Deep site closure plan to ensure proper decommissioning of latrines, backfilling of waste pits and Field Coordinator in co-chairing GPAA partners’ coordination meetings, drafting and circulating dismantlement of humanitarian facilities. The CCCM team is also following up with protection meeting minutes, mobilizing and identifying partners, service mapping and monitoring, and partner to ensure the needs of a residual caseload is addressed and due diligence associated ensuring well-coordinated, needs-based, and responsive humanitarian intervention. Alongside with a voluntary return is met. IOM DTM, the CCCM team established Flow Monitoring Points to identify in and out flow trends and coordinated in conducting headcount exercise in the AA site. Main villages of destination for permanent Number of individual exits from Pibor UNMISS AA exits from Pibor UNMISS AA by date and destination payam # individual exits % of all tracked Village (Payam) 120 tracked exits Manyibol (Gumuruk) 49 13% 100 Bebuzen (Lekuangole) 48 13% Lawul (Gumuruk) 43 12% 80 Gei (Lekuangole) 41 11% 60 Gogothin (Pibor) 32 9% Kongor (Lekuangole) 30 8% 40 Lopot (Gumuruk) 14 4% Thanyang (Gumuruk) 13 4% 20 Monychak (Lekuangole) 13 4% 0 Lekuangole (Lekuangole) 13 4% 07/08/20 08/08/20 09/08/20 10/08/20 11/08/20 12/08/20 13/08/20 Manyaloden (Gumuruk) 12 3% Laol (Gumuruk) 10 3% Gumruk Lekuangole Pibor Vuvet (Gumuruk) 9 2% Other 37 10% All tracked exits 364 100%.
Recommended publications
  • SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 18 June 2018
    SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 18 June 2018 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; Abyei Area: SSNBS, 1 December 2008; Ilemi triangle status and South Sudan/Sudan border status: UN Cartographic Section, October 2011; incident data: ACLED, June 2018; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 18 JUNE 2018 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Battles 604 300 3351 Conflict incidents by category 2 Violence against civilians 404 299 1348 Development of conflict incidents from 2012 to 2017 2 Strategic developments 120 0 0 Riots/protests 46 1 3 Methodology 3 Remote violence 25 3 17 Conflict incidents per province 4 Non-violent activities 1 0 0 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 1200 603 4719 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, June 2018). Disclaimer 5 Development of conflict incidents from 2012 to 2017 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, June 2018). 2 SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 18 JUNE 2018 Methodology an incident occured, or the provincial capital may be used if only the province is known.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH SUDAN - Reference Map
    SOUTH SUDAN - Reference Map Kebkabiya El Fashir Abyad Bara Umm Dam El Kawa Ermil Nahl Doka Umm Bel Sennar Tawila Dirra Umm El Hilla Iyal Es Suki El Hawata Keddada Mahbub El Obeid Rabak Jebel Shangil Tobay Wad Banda Dud Singa Gallabat Wada`ah Umm Rawaba En Nahud El Rahad Higar Galegu El Jebelein Kas Taweisha S U D A N El Abbasiya Nyala Dilling Kortala Dangur El Odaiya Geigar Sharafa Delami Ed Damazin Rashad Renk e l El Barun Ed Da`ein i El Lagowa Abu Jibaiha Edd El Fursan N Babanusa e Heiban t Abu Abu i Bau Guba Ragag h Matariq Kulshabi Bikori Gabra W El Muglad Kadugli Kologi Keili Mumallah Umm Ulu Buram Keilak Talodi Barbit Wadega Belfodiyo Qardud Kaka Paloich Tungaru Junguls Asosa Radom Riangnom Sumeih El Melemm Oriny Kodok Mendi Boing Bambesi Hofrat Naam Fagwir Aboke en Nahas Malakal Nejo Abyei UPPER NILE Daga Bentiu Gimbi Bai War-awar Fangak Malwal Post Kafia Pan Nyal Mayom Kingi Malualkon Abwong Wang Kai Fagwir Kan Sobat Banyjiel Gidami Sadi Aweil Wun Rog Yubdo Gossinga UNITY Gumbiel Nasser NORTHERN Gogrial Nyerol Malek Thul Raga BAHR Akop Leer Mogogh Biel Bure Metu Wun Gambela EL GHAZAL WARRAP Ayod Waat Abay Gore Kwajok Shwai Adok Atiedo Warrap Fathai Faddoi Jonglei Canal Tor Deim Zubeir Madeir E T H I O P I A Bisellia Bir Di Duk Fadiat Akobo WESTERN Wau Gech`a Lol Mbili Duk Kongettit Les Trois BAHR Wakela Atum Faiwil Tepi Riviêres EL GHAZAL Tonj Shambe Peper Pochalla LAKES Kongor C E N T R A L Bo River Post Rafili Giamciar Teferi Rumbek Lau Akelo Palwal Jonglei JONGLEI Pibor A F R I C A N Ubori Akot Pibor Yirol Kantiere R E P U
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Pibor Administrative Area
    35 Real but Fragile: The Greater Pibor Administrative Area By Claudio Todisco Copyright Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva 2015 First published in March 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organi- zation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. Small Arms Survey Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Maison de la Paix, Chemin Eugène-Rigot 2E, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Series editor: Emile LeBrun Copy-edited by Alex Potter ([email protected]) Proofread by Donald Strachan ([email protected]) Cartography by Jillian Luff (www.mapgrafix.com) Typeset in Optima and Palatino by Rick Jones ([email protected]) Printed by nbmedia in Geneva, Switzerland ISBN 978-2-940548-09-5 2 Small Arms Survey HSBA Working Paper 35 Contents List of abbreviations and acronyms .................................................................................................................................... 4 I. Introduction and key findings ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan: Jonglei – “We Have Always Been at War”
    South Sudan: Jonglei – “We Have Always Been at War” Africa Report N°221 | 22 December 2014 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Jonglei’s Conflicts Before the Civil War ........................................................................... 3 A. Perpetual Armed Rebellion ....................................................................................... 3 B. The Politics of Inter-Communal Conflict .................................................................. 4 1. The communal is political .................................................................................... 4 2. Mixed messages: Government response to intercommunal violence ................. 7 3. Ethnically-targeted civilian disarmament ........................................................... 8 C. Region over Ethnicity? Shifting Alliances between the Bahr el Ghazal Dinka, Greater Bor Dinka and Nuer ...................................................................................... 9 III. South Sudan’s Civil War in Jonglei .................................................................................. 12 A. Armed Factions in Jonglei ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Security Responses in Jonglei State in the Aftermath of Inter-Ethnic Violence
    Security responses in Jonglei State in the aftermath of inter-ethnic violence By Richard B. Rands and Dr. Matthew LeRiche Saferworld February 2012 1 Contents List of acronyms 1. Introduction and key findings 2. The current situation: inter-ethnic conflict in Jonglei 3. Security responses 4. Providing an effective response: the challenges facing the security forces in South Sudan 5. Support from UNMISS and other significant international actors 6. Conclusion List of Acronyms CID Criminal Intelligence Division CPA Comprehensive Peace Agreement CRPB Conflict Reduction and Peace Building GHQ General Headquarters GoRSS Government of the Republic of South Sudan ICG International Crisis Group MSF Medecins Sans Frontières MI Military Intelligence NISS National Intelligence and Security Service NSS National Security Service SPLA Sudan People’s Liberation Army SPLM Sudan People’s Liberation Movement SRSG Special Representative of the Secretary General SSP South Sudanese Pounds SSPS South Sudan Police Service SSR Security Sector Reform UNMISS United Nations Mission in South Sudan UYMPDA Upper Nile Youth Mobilization for Peace and Development Agency Acknowledgements This paper was written by Richard B. Rands and Dr Matthew LeRiche. The authors would like to thank Jessica Hayes for her invaluable contribution as research assistant to this paper. The paper was reviewed and edited by Sara Skinner and Hesta Groenewald (Saferworld). Opinions expressed in the paper are those of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of Saferworld. Saferworld is grateful for the funding provided to its South Sudan programme by the UK Department for International Development (DfID) through its South Sudan Peace Fund and the Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) through its Global Peace and Security Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • 49A65b110.Pdf
    30°0'0"E 31°0'0"E 32°0'0"E 33°0'0"E 34°0'0"E 35°0'0"E Buheyrat No ") Popuoch Maya Sinyora Wath Wang Kech Malakal Dugang New Fangak Juaibor " Fatwuk " Pul Luthni Doleib Hill Fakur Ful Nyak " Settlements Rub-koni Ngwer Gar Keuern Fachop " Mudi Kwenek Konna Jonglei State Map Yoynyang Kau Keew Tidfolk " Fatach Fagh Atar Nyiyar Wunalong Wunakir Type Jwol Dajo ") Tiltil Torniok Atar 2 Machar Shol Ajok Fangak Kir Nyin Yar Kuo " Nur Yom Chotbora AbwongTarom ") State Capitals Bentiu Chuth Akol Fachod Thantok Kuleny Abon Abwong Jat Paguir Abuong Ayiot Ariath OLD FANGAK Fangak " ") Kot Fwor Lam Baar Shwai Larger Towns Fulfam Fajur Malualakon Tor Lil Riep ") Madhol ATAR N Rier Mulgak N " " " Mayen Pajok Foan Wuriyang Kan 0 0 ' " ' Kaljak Dier Wunlam Upper Nile Towns 0 Gon Toych Wargar 0 ° Akuem Toch Wunrok Kuey ° 9 Long Wundong Ayien Gwung Tur Dhiak Kuei 9 Fulkwoz Weibuini Dornor Tam Kolatong Wadpir Wunapith Nyinabot Big Villages Fankir Yarkwaich Chuai Twengdeng Mawyek Muk Tidbil Fawal Wunador Manyang Gadul Nyadin Wunarual Tel Luwangni Small Villages Rublik List Wunanomdamir Piath Nyongchar Yafgar Paguil Kunmir Toriak Akai Uleng Fanawak Pagil Fawagik Kor Nyerol Nyirol Main Road Network Nyakang Liet Tundi Wuncum Tok Rial Kurnyith Gweir Lung Nasser Koch Nyod Falagh Kandak Pulturuk Maiwut " Famyr Tar Turuk ") County Boundaries Jumbel Menime Kandag Dor " Dur NYIROL Ad Fakwan Haat Agaigai Rum Kwei Ket Thol Wor Man Lankien State Boundaries Dengdur Maya Tawil Raad Turu Garjok Mojogh Obel Pa Ing Wang Gai Rufniel Mogok Maadin Nyakoi Futh Dengain Mandeng Kull
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan 2021 Humanitarian Response Plan
    HUMANITARIAN HUMANITARIAN PROGRAMME CYCLE 2021 RESPONSE PLAN ISSUED MARCH 2021 SOUTH SUDAN 01 About This document is consolidated by OCHA on behalf of the Humanitarian Country Team and partners. The Humanitarian Response Plan is a presentation of the coordinated, strategic response devised by humanitarian agencies in order to meet the acute needs of people affected by the crisis. It is based on, and responds to, evidence of needs described in the Humanitarian Needs Overview. Manyo Renk Renk SUDAN Kaka Melut Melut Maban Fashoda Riangnhom Bunj Oriny UPPER NILE Abyei region Pariang Panyikang Malakal Abiemnhom Tonga Malakal Baliet Aweil East Abiemnom Rubkona Aweil North Guit Baliet Dajo Gok-Machar War-Awar Twic Mayom Atar 2 Longochuk Bentiu Guit Mayom Old Fangak Aweil West Turalei Canal/Pigi Gogrial East Fangak Aweil Gogrial Luakpiny/Nasir Maiwut Aweil West UNITY Yomding Raja NORTHERN South Gogrial Koch Nyirol Nasir Maiwut Raja BAHR EL Bar Mayen Koch Ulang Kuajok WARRAP Leer Lunyaker Ayod GHAAL Tonj North Mayendit Ayod Aweil Centre Waat Mayendit Leer Uror Warrap Romic ETHIOPIA Yuai Tonj East WESTERN BAHR Nyal Duk Fadiat Akobo Wau Maper JONGLEI CENTRAL EL GHAAL Panyijiar Duk Akobo Kuajiena Rumbek North AFRICAN Wau Tonj Pochalla Jur River Cueibet REPUBLIC Tonj Rumbek Kongor Pochala South Cueibet Centre Yirol East Twic East Rumbek Adior Pibor Rumbek East Nagero Wullu Akot Yirol Bor South Tambura Yirol West Nagero LAKES Awerial Pibor Bor Boma Wulu Mvolo Awerial Mvolo Tambura Terekeka Kapoeta International boundary WESTERN Terekeka North Mundri
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 7 Background of the Landmine Impact Survey .......................................................................................... 16 Survey Results and Findings Scope of the Landmine Problem............................................................................................................. 21 Analysis of Economic Blockage Impacts................................................................................................. 41 Retrofit Results ....................................................................................................................................... 43 Past Mine Action .................................................................................................................................... 45 Profiles by State Blue Nile ................................................................................................................................................ 51 Central Equatoria................................................................................................................................... 57 Eastern Equatoria................................................................................................................................... 65 Gadaref.................................................................................................................................................. 71 Jonglei
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Rinderpest Control in Southern Sudan 1989-2000
    Review of Rinderpest Control in Southern Sudan 1989-2000 Prepared for the Community-based Animal Health and Epidemiology (CAPE) Unit of the Pan African Programme for the Control of Epizootics (PACE) Bryony Jones March 2001 Acknowledgements The information contained in this document has been collected over the years by southern Sudanese animal health workers, UNICEF/OLS Livestock Project staff, Tufts University consultants, and the staff of NGOs that have supported community-based animal health projects in southern Sudan (ACROSS, ACORD, ADRA, DOT, GAA, NPA, Oxfam-GB, Oxfam-Quebec, SC-UK, VETAID, VSF-B, VSF-CH, VSF-G, Vetwork Services Trust, World Relief). The individuals involved are too numerous to name, but their hard work and contribution of information is gratefully acknowledged. The data from the early years of the OLS Livestock Programme (1993 to 1996) was collated by Tim Leyland, formerly UNICEF/OLS Livestock Project Officer. Disease outbreak information from 1998 to date has been collated by Dr Gachengo Matindi, FAO/OLS Livestock Officer (formerly UNICEF/OLS Livestock Officer). Rinderpest serology and virus testing has mainly been carried out by National Veterinary Research Centre, Muguga, Nairobi. Any errors or omissions in this review are the fault of the author. If any reader has additional information to correct an error or omission the author would be grateful to receive this information. For further information contact: CAPE Unit PACE Programme OAU/IBAR PO Box 30786 Nairobi Tel: Nairobi 226447 Fax: Nairobi 226565 E mail: [email protected] Or the author: Bryony Jones PO Box 13434 Nairobi Kenya Tel: Nairobi 580799 E mail: [email protected] 2 CONTENTS Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan: Response Scale-Up for Highly Food Insecure Areas Situation Report No
    South Sudan: Response scale-up for highly food insecure areas Situation Report No. 8 As of 30 June 2021 This report is produced by OCHA South Sudan on behalf of the Inter-Cluster Coordination Group (ICCG). It covers the period from 1 to 30 June 2021. This will be the final situation report on the response scale-up. HIGHLIGHTS • In June, the Food Security and Livelihoods (FSL) Cluster partners reached more than 96,000 people with food assistance in the Greater Pibor Administrative Area (GPAA). This represents 94 per cent of the people targeted. To date, the FSL Cluster reached 1,000 households in the six priority 1 counties with main-season response support. • Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) Cluster partners reached 131,000 people with WASH/NFI kits and basic hygiene messaging in communities with children who have high global acute malnutrition (GAM) and/or high incidence of diarrheal diseases. This represents 75 per cent of the people targeted. Eight water points were rehabilitated in nutrition facilities and 11 were rehabilitated in the six priority counties. • The Health Cluster provided consultations for 32,847 people in the six priority 1 counties in June. Trainings in comprehensive management of rape cases, integrated disease surveillance and response system were provided. • Nutrition partners treated 3,360 children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM), 8,942 children with moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) and 8,749 acute malnourished pregnant and lactating women (AM-PLW) in the six priority 1 counties during the reporting period. Prepositioning of nutrition supplies is ongoing. Funding shortages limit the ability to provide sufficient nutrition programme coverage to reach people in remote areas.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH SUDAN Jonglei Reference Map
    SOUTH SUDAN Jonglei reference map Pariang Mountain Nile Popuoch Berboi Wath Wang Tambuong Duoldong Waskedi Hotkech Kuerdop SUDAN Kwin Chok Manyajak Kanyang Kota Dugang Tharyier Kwirthar Kuerthok Bi Area B Dor Thworo Kuerlual Kuerkier Thukak Baliet Bei Deng Gak Fatugu Wuobo Fatwuk Patit Ful Nyak Nahr Sobat Gar Bulriah Diel Fakur Mandeng Nyinakoon Wut Akot Wilnyang Wulaokot Fakwam Yaradew Adidiang Kuir Kwol Keuern Kolanyang Deng Luat Againg Kotyaka Ayoolyool Badodi Malwal Khorfulus Tharliel Chielbiluang Ngautoch Mudi Fekang Kuernyiene Mundeing Wang Yag Wutkot Kwan Bwing Shebalueng Agak Gobjak Kuerdew Adiang Toi Keew Theke Ful Lual Ngenyakol Wunalong Mareng Fatach Kuernyang Wuthol Pulita Buol Nurlonga Koldhuor Amanyang Wunkuach Fagh Atar Wunbiar Wunakir Kontet Panyang 2 Kuerkuon Bwon Ngera Korwai Abendel Panyikang Torniok Majoknyang Machar Patai Nyokkuach Shol Ajok Katjur Patuel (1) Longochuk ETHIOPIA Guit Dortwoi Yom Retchol Dhuony Abwong Dulareng Pagune Wangthiel Patuel (2) Nur Koleng Jungyang Thanilak Gamtang Wang Kiel Angnor Fachod Tike Gmatong Wunapith Kuolachuor Maling Paguer Neinjang Chweg But Chotkol Kuolakou Awoulgok Abon Wunanyak Jat Metal Kuer Kulang Choatbora CENTRAL Kachnhial Pieth Wunalam Chuei Puyai Mulekich Wutdeng AFRICAN Kot Kayoh Fwor Bieu Canal/pigi Fangak Riep Fangak Lam Shwai REPUBLIC Lil Fuyach Doregh Kieriel Fajur Dhoareak Fulfam Payat Putuni Wan Kaljak Reng Agayng Kwendil Mayen Pajok Pulieth Paguen Dier Kan Fayat Ngong Wunlam Wunlam Longtam Wunadong Ruv-dub Toch Wundong Loungteam Manadwai Wunakei Fasay Diera Buk
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Sudan
    CF Item Barcode Sign Page 2 Date 04-Oct-2004 Time 11:24:30 AM Login Name Upasana Youn CF/RAI/USAA/DB01/HS/2004-00248 Expanded Number CF/RAI/USAA/DB01/HS/2004-00248 External ID Title UNICEF and Sudan Relief & Rehab Ass. A Critical Review of OLS Operation Lifeline Sudan Southern Sector. A critical review of the Management and Impact of Seeds and Tools Programmes in Southern Sudan. Oct 90. Date Created Date Registered Date Closed 04-Oct-2004at11:OOAM 04-Oct-2004at11:OOAM Primary Contact Owner Location Record & Archive Manage Related Functions=80669443 Home Location History Related Records =60909132 Current Location/Assignee Record & Archive Manage Related Functions=80669443 since 04-Oc FI2: Status Certain? No F/3: Record Copy? No 101: In, Out, Internal Rec or Rec Copy Contained Records Container Date Published Fd3: Doc Type - Format Da1:Date First Published Priority Record Type A02 HIST CORR ITEM Document Details Record has no document attached. Print Name of Person Submit Image Signature of Person Submit Number of images — --.? -_ without cover J lJ2 J L /?K OPERATION LIFELINE SUDAN Southern Sector A Critical Review of the Management and Impact of Seeds and Tools Programmes in Southern Sudan CONTENTS SECTION 1. SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS 2 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1.1 INTRODUCTION 4 1.2 PROGRAMME IMPACT 5 1.3 BENEFICIARIES AND RECEIPTS 6 1.4 CONCLUSIONS 7 2. OVERALL FINDINGS 9 2.1 METHODOLOGY 9 2.2 LOGISTICS 9 2.3 DISTRIBUTION 10 2.4 RECORD KEEPING 10 2.5 TIMING 11 2.6 QUALITY AND CONDITION OF INPUTS 12 2.7 SUITABILITY OF TYPES PROVIDED 12 -W- 2.8 SUITABILITY OF VARIETIES PROVIDED 13 2.9 LOCAL SEED AND TOOL SUPPLIES 13 2.10 SUFFICIENCY OF RELIEF INPUTS 14 2.11 LOSSES 14 2.12 STATE OF THE CROPS 14 SECTION 2.
    [Show full text]