Pibor UNMISS Adjacent Area IOM DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX SOUTH SUDAN Flow Monitoring Summary (7–18 August 2020) Overview The first half of 2020 was marked by an escalation in sub-national and localized violence throughout Although attacking groups have largely retreated to their communities, the impacts of the conflict the country and Jonglei State and the Greater Pibor Administrative Area (GPAA) have been major in the first half of the year continue to be deeply felt by local populations. According to PLAN hotspots for such violence. Since early 2020, there has been renewed displacement, attacks on International and the NNGO, CIDO a total of 33,668 Individuals (11,443 households) were humanitarian supplies and personnel and civilian abuses in central and southern parts of Jonglei, as registered in early August 2020 at the UNMISS Adjacent Area (AA) and several spontaneous well as lowland Pibor. Following the large-scale attack on Pieri in Uror County on 16 May 2020, displacement sites throughout Pibor Town. Nearly all households are reported to have returned groups of armed youth launched an assault on key areas around Pibor, which was met by a series to Lekuangole and Gumruk by the end of the same month. UNMISS Pibor AA housed 403 of counter attacks throughout June. Violence continued into July and August, with tensions spilling individuals according to a DTM headcount conducted on 7 August 2020. Access constraints over into neighbouring parts of the country. rendered assessments beyond Pibor Town challenging, limiting available data to the town. In June 2020, President Salva Kiir established a high-level committee to address conflict, but The humanitarian response has been disrupted, further eroding people’s ability to meet their basic mistrust between groups remains high, due in part to the persistence of unaddressed grievances needs, which has been compounded by the destruction of civilian property and livelihoods and connected to the long history of violence in the area. loss of livestock during recurrent fighting, as well as flooding. While heavy rain could temper the possibility of further violence, the potential for additional violent incidents in Jonglei State and the GPAA, still exists. Spontaneous Displacement Sites in Pibor* Locations of departure by number of persons R r . A o b t i a la P l r SUDAN . a bo R R . ko Pibor Town ch r-A Akobo A o o g P B w - e r Displacement Sites o i b R i . Uror R K P . ETHIOPIA ± S o Residential Area h n ± w g a - Hai Kandako K Gadiang l !( Rivers L Kondako Primary School Jonglei o n Ajwara i SOUTH SUDAN !( ku g Talo Ngawalem !( Roads a Lekuangole n g o ) Pochalla l u Buildings e a - L A ( i ko n Hai Jalaba East e KENYA b r DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO G . o o UGANDAR Kongor !( alla b Poch i Pibor- P Lukriyang Hai Jalaba West . Kelo !( R Individuals Pibor Town Hai Chok 16,579 County of Interest Bolotinganu !( Boma-Pibor Pibor Boys Primary School 16,580 - 17,089 State of Interest Lawol Jonglei !( Pibor Girls Primary School ! ( !( Rivers Settlements at Gumuruk az Pibor UNMISS AA !( Dorat el Roads County Dorein!( . L Hai MuderiaPibor !( R Bolotifor erru !( R . G . R R G . e K r an Gumuruk ru Thambet ge Hai Mattar n R Bor South . Pibor K a Hai JackorLankachod n bor g r-Pi e r Bo n Walichmar o B t b Werngueny a i o !( P m a z l a - a l r l - i o P t e B B ib o L o o L . r . r R Kavachoch - R R. Lotilla P ib Pengko o Anyidi !( r !( K K a im sa o n to g n R. K g o ange - r n B - Langachot Primary School o B r ia Pariak t !( R *Excluding an area near the Pibor MSF compound near the Pibor *Excluding an area . S R u . p i N r i a r n ( B o e a Central Equatoria Disclaimer: This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries h g Disclaimer: This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries 0 15 30 60 0 1,100 2,200 r R. Sitiri n e l Kilometers on this map no not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Meters - a on thJ is mTaep rneo kneotk imaply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. e i Kassangor b K Lafon ir !( e it . l S ) . R Eastern Equatoria R For more information, please contact DTM South Sudan at [email protected] or visit displacement.iom.int/south-sudan SUDAN Pibor UNMISS Adjacent Area ETHIOPIA Jonglei IOM DISPLACEMENT SOUTH SUDAN TRACKING MATRIX CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC SOUTH SUDAN Flow Monitoring Summary (7–18 August 2020) KENYA DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO UGANDA Camp Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) In response to the influxes, and in close coordination with the CCCM Cluster and OCHA, a CCCM also undertook a governance mapping exercise and mobilized IDP Community Leaders CCCM surge team – comprising of Cluster and Partner Coordination, Community Engagement for information sharing meetings. At the same time, the CCCM site planner conducted a flood and a Technical Specialist – were deployed to the four Collective Centres and Pibor AA Site assessment in the AA site and the collective centres to ascertain for the site works needed to in order to coordinate lifesaving services through partner coordination, advocacy, and liaison; upgrade the drainage system and mitigate against flooding. In the interim, following a significant service monitoring; engineering assessment and support; and community governance. number of departures from the site witnessed by the flow monitoring points due to heavy rains that caused flooding within site, a lack of services and advocacy from community leaders During the response, the CCCM team engaged with the OCHA Deep Field Coordinator and and local authorities to leave the site and collective centres providing relative stabilization of local authorities represented by RRC and Chief Administrator of GPAA to identify gaps and the situation in areas of origin, the team is engaging with OCHA and relevant partner for a address humanitarian needs in the area. In addition, the CCCM team supported the OCHA Deep site closure plan to ensure proper decommissioning of latrines, backfilling of waste pits and Field Coordinator in co-chairing GPAA partners’ coordination meetings, drafting and circulating dismantlement of humanitarian facilities. The CCCM team is also following up with protection meeting minutes, mobilizing and identifying partners, service mapping and monitoring, and partner to ensure the needs of a residual caseload is addressed and due diligence associated ensuring well-coordinated, needs-based, and responsive humanitarian intervention. Alongside with a voluntary return is met. IOM DTM, the CCCM team established Flow Monitoring Points to identify in and out flow trends and coordinated in conducting headcount exercise in the AA site. Main villages of destination for permanent Number of individual exits from Pibor UNMISS AA exits from Pibor UNMISS AA by date and destination payam # individual exits % of all tracked Village (Payam) 120 tracked exits Manyibol (Gumuruk) 49 13% 100 Bebuzen (Lekuangole) 48 13% Lawul (Gumuruk) 43 12% 80 Gei (Lekuangole) 41 11% 60 Gogothin (Pibor) 32 9% Kongor (Lekuangole) 30 8% 40 Lopot (Gumuruk) 14 4% Thanyang (Gumuruk) 13 4% 20 Monychak (Lekuangole) 13 4% 0 Lekuangole (Lekuangole) 13 4% 07/08/20 08/08/20 09/08/20 10/08/20 11/08/20 12/08/20 13/08/20 Manyaloden (Gumuruk) 12 3% Laol (Gumuruk) 10 3% Gumruk Lekuangole Pibor Vuvet (Gumuruk) 9 2% Other 37 10% All tracked exits 364 100%.