Epithelial Response of the Rat Gastric Mucosa to Chronic Superficial Injury Eric R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Epithelial Response of the Rat Gastric Mucosa to Chronic Superficial Injury Eric R YALE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 69 (1996), pp. 105-118. Copyright © 1997. All rights reserved. Epithelial Response of the Rat Gastric Mucosa to Chronic Superficial Injury Eric R. Lacya,b, Kathryn S. Cowartb, Jan S. Kingb, John DelVallec, and Adam J. Smolkad Departments ofbCell Biology and Anatomy, and dMedicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina and cDepartment ofInternal Medicine, University ofMichigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Received March 5, 1996; accepted July 15, 1996) Chronic injury to the healthy gastric mucosa with noxious agents such as aspirin or alcohol induces a progressive strengthening of the stomach wall against these insults. The present study examined the histologic response of the rat gastric mucosa to chronic destruction of the superficial mucosa for one month with hypertonic saline. The number, position and morphology of proliferating, pari- etal, G and D cells were followed during mucosal injury and one month of recovery. The results showed that chronic injury reduced parietal cell numbers by about 30 percent, particularly in the middle of the mucosal thickness where a clear zone was formed by hypertrophy of mucous neck-like cells. G cells were also reduced by about 50 percent, but there were no changes in D cells. Chronic injury induced a marked increase in the number of antral (+1 12 percent) and fundic (+250 percent) proliferating cells. Conclusion: The rat gastric mucosa responds to chronic superficial injury by down-regulation of acid secretory cells and gastrin secreting cells and an up-regulation of proliferating cells. The appearance of a prominent layer of mucous neck-like cells may indicate a new secretory function for these cells. INTRODUCTION Circumstantial evidence from patients ingesting noxious agents such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and various mixtures of ethanol indicates that chronic insult to the gastric mucosa may be an important factor in the development of some gastropathies [1]. Nevertheless, most experimental studies of gastric damage and repair utilize a single, large dose of a strong necrotizing agent such as absolute ethanol to produce gross lesions in the stomach. These experimental protocols clearly have advantages for screening poten- tial gastro-protective drugs and to monitor the sequelae of healing events, but they proba- bly have little clinical relevance [2]. Relatively few experimental studies have monitored the progression of gastric mucos- al responses after successive doses of an orally administered damaging agent [3-12]. Surprisingly, repeated exposure to a strong necrotizing agent such as 80 percent ethanol induces a progressive mucosal resistance despite the agent's initial production of hemor- rhagic lesions. The mucosa also becomes progressively protected against the effects of strong necrotizing agents when it is chronically insulted with a mild damaging agent which destroys only the superficial epithelium. Very little is known about the mechanisms by which augmented mucosal protection is acquired under these conditions. A previous study showed that chronic superficial insult resulted in rapid re-establishment of the aTo whom all correspondence should be addressed: Eric R. Lacy, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC 29425. Tel: (803) 792-3549; Fax: (803) 792-0664; E-mail: [email protected]. eAbbreviations: PBS, phosphate buffered saline; BrdU, 5'-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine. 105 106 Lacy et al.: Chronic gastric injury mucosal surface epithelium and changes in the composition of antral mucus, but other his- tological responses to the repeated injury are unknown [12]. With this in mind, the present study utilized a clinically relevant model of chronically insulted gastric mucosa to exam- ine potential responses in the number, position and morphology of selected epithelial cells. Histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques were used to localize parietal cells, proliferating cells, and cells containing gastrin (G cells), and somatostatin (D cells) in the fundic and antral mucosa of rats subjected to chronic superficial mucosal injury for one month followed by one month of recovery. The results showed that chronic injury induced significant changes in the number and position of these cells, which may reflect the development of mucosal protection. MATERIALS AND METHODS Male Sprague-Dawley rats (150-250 g, Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Wilmington, DE) were fed standard laboratory chow and kept on a 12-hr light/dark cycle. Except for a 30-min dosing period, all rats were allowed water ad libitum. The experimental group of rats was placed on a four week regimen of chronic intra- gastric dosing with hypertonic saline followed by four weeks without dosing. Previous studies had shown that 2 M NaCl destroyed the superficial gastric epithelium without inducing hemorrhagic lesions [12]. Each rat received a single bolus (two to three ml) of 2 M NaCl orogastrically every 48 hours between 1:00 and 2:30 p.m. During this part of the animals' diurnal cycle they were somnolent and their stomachs nearly void of food, which allowed direct access of saline to the gastric mucosal surface. After dosing, the rats were returned to their cages and deprived of food and water for 30 min followed by free access to both. During the four-week recovery period when rats were not dosed, they were given free access to both food and water and were handled in the same manner as the untreated control group. The two control groups of rats received either physiological saline (0.9 percent) in the same manner as the experimental rats or were left untreated. Rats were sacrificed at two and four weeks after the initiation of the dosing regimen and four weeks after its termination. At the termination of each segment of the experiment, rats were anesthetized with ether, the stomachs were exposed by laparotomy, and the gas- troesophageal and gastroduodenal junctions were ligated taking care not to occlude blood vessels and nerves. The nonglandular stomach was pierced with a 26-gauge needle, and three to four ml of either Carnoy's or Bouin's fixative was injected to gently inflate the gastric wall. Optimal immunohistochemistry for light microscopic identification of pro- liferating cells and parietal cells was achieved using Carnoy's fixative. Bouin's fixative was optimal for immunohistochemical localization of G and D cells. The same fixative as used for intragastric inflation also was poured over the external stomach surface and the preparation left in situ. After 20 min, the animals were killed and the ligated stomach was excised and submersed in fixative for an additional one to three hr at room temperature. The stomach was hemisected along the greater and lesser curvatures and full thickness pieces of the gastric wall were excised with a razor blade. Two strips of fundus (1.5-2.0 x 0.5 cm), each from the greater to lesser curvature adjacent to the limiting ridge, and one piece (0.5 x 0.5 cm) of antrum were excised. These tissues were processed for light microscopy as previously described [12] or for routine histochemistry and immunochem- istry as described below. All tissue samples were embedded in paraffin, sections cut five micrometers thick, placed on glass slides, deparaffinized and rehydrated using standard techniques. Some sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Masson's Trichrome for his- tochemistry. Other sections were prepared for immunohistochemistry by pretreatment for five min in three percent H202 to eliminate endogenous peroxidase activity, then rinsed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS)e. Exposure of tissue sections to the four different antisera Lacy et al.: Chronic gastric injury 107 listed below was perforned at room temperature (except where specified) in a sealed, mois- turized chamber. Proliferating cells were labeled with antisera to 5'-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU), which had been injected into rats for one hr according to previously published techniques [13]. Parietal cells were localized using a monoclonal antibody directed against H+/K+- ATPase [14]. This antibody was made by standard hybridoma techniques using as antigen pig gastric microsomal vesicles highly enriched in H+/K+-ATPase. Immunoblot analysis shows antibody specificity for the a subunit of H+/K+-ATPase, with an apparent molecu- lar mass by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of 94 kDa (not shown). The antibody stains only parietal cells in pig, rabbit, rat, human, dog, guinea pig, and gerbil gastric mucosa. In these cells, tubulovesicular and secretory canalicular mem- branes are the site of antibody reactivity. Sections were preincubated in one percent bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 min at room temperature then incubated in H,K- ATPase monoclonal antibody at a 1:100 dilution in PBS overnight at 40C. The slides were rinsed in PBS then incubated in peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG at a 1:100 dilu- tion in PBS for 20 minutes. Gastrin (G) cells were localized using specific antisera according to previously pub- lished techniques [15]. D cells were localized using a previously described sheep anti-somatostatin antiserum (8093) generated against somatostatin-14 [16]. The antiserum cross-reacts with both somatostatin-14 and somatostatin-28 and does not cross-react with gastrin, glucagon bombesin, pancreatic polypeptide, O-endorphin or neurotensin. Sections were preincubat- ed in a 1:100 dilution of blocking serum (normal rabbit serum) in PBS for 30 min then incubated overnight at 40C in a 1:1000 antiserum dilution in PBS. The sections were rinsed in PBS then incubated in a 1:50 dilution in PBS of rabbit anti-sheep IgG (secondary antibody) for 20 min, rinsed in PBS, then incubated in a 1:100 dilution of sheep peroxi- dase-antiperoxidase in PBS for 20 min. The final step for each of the four antiserum procedures described above was incuba- tion of the tissue sections in a 0.04 percent solution of 3.3 diaminobenzidine tetrahy- drochloride in Tris buffer, pH 7.3, to which 33 ml of 3.0 percent H202 was addedjust prior to use.
Recommended publications
  • Organization of the Gastrointestinal Tract
    Organization of the gastrointestinal tract Development of the Foregut, Midgut, and Hindgut Development of the alimentary canal It constitutes during the 4th week from 3 separate embryonic anlages (organs): - The stomodeum (primitive mouth) – develops on the cephalic end of the embryo, is limited by 5 frominences (frontonasal, 2 maxillary, 2 mandibular) ectoderm oropharyngeal membrane. - The primitive gut arises by incorporation of the dorsal part of the yolk sac into embryo during cephalocaudal and lateral folding of the embryo gut is connected to the yolk sac by means of the vitelline (omphalomesenteric) duct endoderm cloacal membrane - The proctodeum (anal pit) - develops on the caudal end of the embryo between future bases of lower limbs - ectoderm - while the ectoderm of the stomodeum and proctodeum as well as the endoderm of the gut differentiate into the epithelium of the alimentary canal, - The muscular and fibrous elements + visceral peritoneum derive from the splanchnic mesenchyma that surrounds the lining of the primitive gut. Development of associated glands: - (salivary glands, liver and pancreas) develop from the endoderm (ectoderm) that gives rise to specific cells (hepatocytes, exo- and endocrine cells of the pancreas (the parenchyma) DERIVATIVES OF THE PRIMITIVE GUT The foregut: . the pharynx and branchiogenic organs . the lower respiratory tract . the esophagus . the stomach . the duodenum proximal to the opening of the bile duct . the liver and pancreas + the biliary apparatus The midgut: . the small intestines, including the part of the duodenum distal to the opening of the bile duct . the caecum and appendix . the ascending colon . the transverse colon The hindgut: . the descending colon . the sigmoid colon .
    [Show full text]
  • The Oesophagus Lined with Gastric Mucous Membrane by P
    Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.8.2.87 on 1 June 1953. Downloaded from Thorax (1953), 8, 87. THE OESOPHAGUS LINED WITH GASTRIC MUCOUS MEMBRANE BY P. R. ALLISON AND A. S. JOHNSTONE Leeds (RECEIVED FOR PUBLICATION FEBRUARY 26, 1953) Peptic oesophagitis and peptic ulceration of the likely to find its way into the museum. The result squamous epithelium of the oesophagus are second- has been that pathologists have been describing ary to regurgitation of digestive juices, are most one thing and clinicians another, and they have commonly found in those patients where the com- had the same name. The clarification of this point petence ofthecardia has been lost through herniation has been so important, and the description of a of the stomach into the mediastinum, and have gastric ulcer in the oesophagus so confusing, that been aptly named by Barrett (1950) " reflux oeso- it would seem to be justifiable to refer to the latter phagitis." In the past there has been some dis- as Barrett's ulcer. The use of the eponym does not cussion about gastric heterotopia as a cause of imply agreement with Barrett's description of an peptic ulcer of the oesophagus, but this point was oesophagus lined with gastric mucous membrane as very largely settled when the term reflux oesophagitis " stomach." Such a usage merely replaces one was coined. It describes accurately in two words confusion by another. All would agree that the the pathology and aetiology of a condition which muscular tube extending from the pharynx down- is a common cause of digestive disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Vestibule Lingual Frenulum Tongue Hyoid Bone Trachea (A) Soft Palate
    Mouth (oral cavity) Parotid gland Tongue Sublingual gland Salivary Submandibular glands gland Esophagus Pharynx Stomach Pancreas (Spleen) Liver Gallbladder Transverse colon Duodenum Descending colon Small Jejunum Ascending colon intestine Ileum Large Cecum intestine Sigmoid colon Rectum Appendix Anus Anal canal © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Nasopharynx Hard palate Soft palate Oral cavity Uvula Lips (labia) Palatine tonsil Vestibule Lingual tonsil Oropharynx Lingual frenulum Epiglottis Tongue Laryngopharynx Hyoid bone Esophagus Trachea (a) © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 2 Upper lip Gingivae Hard palate (gums) Soft palate Uvula Palatine tonsil Oropharynx Tongue (b) © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 3 Nasopharynx Hard palate Soft palate Oral cavity Uvula Lips (labia) Palatine tonsil Vestibule Lingual tonsil Oropharynx Lingual frenulum Epiglottis Tongue Laryngopharynx Hyoid bone Esophagus Trachea (a) © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 4 Visceral peritoneum Intrinsic nerve plexuses • Myenteric nerve plexus • Submucosal nerve plexus Submucosal glands Mucosa • Surface epithelium • Lamina propria • Muscle layer Submucosa Muscularis externa • Longitudinal muscle layer • Circular muscle layer Serosa (visceral peritoneum) Nerve Gland in Lumen Artery mucosa Mesentery Vein Duct oF gland Lymphoid tissue outside alimentary canal © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 5 Diaphragm Falciform ligament Lesser Liver omentum Spleen Pancreas Gallbladder Stomach Duodenum Visceral peritoneum Transverse colon Greater omentum Mesenteries Parietal peritoneum Small intestine Peritoneal cavity Uterus Large intestine Cecum Rectum Anus Urinary bladder (a) (b) © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 6 Cardia Fundus Esophagus Muscularis Serosa externa • Longitudinal layer • Circular layer • Oblique layer Body Lesser Rugae curvature of Pylorus mucosa Greater curvature Duodenum Pyloric Pyloric sphincter antrum (a) (valve) © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. 7 Fundus Body Rugae of mucosa Pyloric Pyloric (b) sphincter antrum © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Digestive System Overview of the Digestive System • Organs Are Divided Into Two Groups the Alimentary Canal and Accessory
    C H A P T E R 23 The Digestive System 1 Overview of the Digestive System • Organs are divided into two groups • The alimentary canal • Mouth, pharynx, and esophagus • Stomach, small intestine, and large intestine (colon) • Accessory digestive organs • Teeth and tongue • Gallbladder, salivary glands, liver, and pancreas 2 The Alimentary Canal and Accessory Digestive Organs Mouth (oral cavity) Parotid gland Tongue Sublingual gland Salivary glands Submandibular gland Esophagus Pharynx Stomach Pancreas (Spleen) Liver Gallbladder Transverse colon Duodenum Descending colon Small intestine Jejunum Ascending colon Ileum Cecum Large intestine Sigmoid colon Rectum Anus Vermiform appendix Anal canal Figure 23.1 3 1 Digestive Processes • Ingestion • Propulsion • Mechanical digestion • Chemical digestion • Absorption • Defecation 4 Peristalsis • Major means of propulsion • Adjacent segments of the alimentary canal relax and contract Figure 23.3a 5 Segmentation • Rhythmic local contractions of the intestine • Mixes food with digestive juices Figure 23.3b 6 2 The Peritoneal Cavity and Peritoneum • Peritoneum – a serous membrane • Visceral peritoneum – surrounds digestive organs • Parietal peritoneum – lines the body wall • Peritoneal cavity – a slit-like potential space Falciform Anterior Visceral ligament peritoneum Liver Peritoneal cavity (with serous fluid) Stomach Parietal peritoneum Kidney (retroperitoneal) Wall of Posterior body trunk Figure 23.5 7 Mesenteries • Lesser omentum attaches to lesser curvature of stomach Liver Gallbladder Lesser omentum
    [Show full text]
  • Normal Gross and Histologic Features of the Gastrointestinal Tract
    NORMAL GROSS AND HISTOLOGIC 1 FEATURES OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT THE NORMAL ESOPHAGUS left gastric, left phrenic, and left hepatic accessory arteries. Veins in the proximal and mid esopha- Anatomy gus drain into the systemic circulation, whereas Gross Anatomy. The adult esophagus is a the short gastric and left gastric veins of the muscular tube measuring approximately 25 cm portal system drain the distal esophagus. Linear and extending from the lower border of the cri- arrays of large caliber veins are unique to the distal coid cartilage to the gastroesophageal junction. esophagus and can be a helpful clue to the site of It lies posterior to the trachea and left atrium a biopsy when extensive cardiac-type mucosa is in the mediastinum but deviates slightly to the present near the gastroesophageal junction (4). left before descending to the diaphragm, where Lymphatic vessels are present in all layers of the it traverses the hiatus and enters the abdomen. esophagus. They drain to paratracheal and deep The subdiaphragmatic esophagus lies against cervical lymph nodes in the cervical esophagus, the posterior surface of the left hepatic lobe (1). bronchial and posterior mediastinal lymph nodes The International Classification of Diseases in the thoracic esophagus, and left gastric lymph and the American Joint Commission on Cancer nodes in the abdominal esophagus. divide the esophagus into upper, middle, and lower thirds, whereas endoscopists measure distance to points in the esophagus relative to the incisors (2). The esophagus begins 15 cm from the incisors and extends 40 cm from the incisors in the average adult (3). The upper and lower esophageal sphincters represent areas of increased resting tone but lack anatomic landmarks; they are located 15 to 18 cm from the incisors and slightly proximal to the gastroesophageal junction, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the Digestive System
    The Digestive System Anatomy of the Digestive System We need food for cellular utilization: organs of digestive system form essentially a long !nutrients as building blocks for synthesis continuous tube open at both ends !sugars, etc to break down for energy ! alimentary canal (gastrointestinal tract) most food that we eat cannot be directly used by the mouth!pharynx!esophagus!stomach! body small intestine!large intestine !too large and complex to be absorbed attached to this tube are assorted accessory organs and structures that aid in the digestive processes !chemical composition must be modified to be useable by cells salivary glands teeth digestive system functions to altered the chemical and liver physical composition of food so that it can be gall bladder absorbed and used by the body; ie pancreas mesenteries Functions of Digestive System: The GI tract (digestive system) is located mainly in 1. physical and chemical digestion abdominopelvic cavity 2. absorption surrounded by serous membrane = visceral peritoneum 3. collect & eliminate nonuseable components of food this serous membrane is continuous with parietal peritoneum and extends between digestive organs as mesenteries ! hold organs in place, prevent tangling Human Anatomy & Physiology: Digestive System; Ziser Lecture Notes, 2014.4 1 Human Anatomy & Physiology: Digestive System; Ziser Lecture Notes, 2014.4 2 is suspended from rear of soft palate The wall of the alimentary canal consists of 4 layers: blocks nasal passages when swallowing outer serosa: tongue visceral peritoneum,
    [Show full text]
  • Gastric and Duodenal Mucosa in 'Healthy' Individuals an Endoscopic and Histopathological Study of 50 Volunteers
    J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.31.1.69 on 1 January 1978. Downloaded from Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1978, 31, 69-77 Gastric and duodenal mucosa in 'healthy' individuals An endoscopic and histopathological study of 50 volunteers J. KREUNING1, F. T. BOSMAN2, G. KUIPER', A. M. v.d. WAL2, AND J. LINDEMAN2 From the Department of Gastroenterology' and the Department ofPathology2, University Medical Centre, Wassenaarseweg 62, Leiden, The Netherlands SUMMARY The results of histological and immunohistochemical examination of gastric and duo- denal biopsy specimens from 50 volunteers without a clinical history of gastrointestinal disease are reported. Multiple specimens of tissue from standard sites in the stomach and duodenum were carefully orientated, and serially sectioned for examination by light microscopy and for immuno- histochemical characterisation of plasma cells within the lamina propria. The antrum and fundus were normal in 32 of the 50 subjects but the other 18 showed histo- pathological evidence of gastritis in either the antrum or fundus. The latter appeared to be age- related. There was considerable variation in the appearance of the surface epithelium of the duodenum within as well as among individual subjects. Superficial gastric metaplasia in one or more biopsy copyright. specimens from the duodenal bulb was found in 64% of individuals. Histopathological examina- tion of the duodenum revealed signs of chronic inflammation in 12 % ofthe subjects. In two individ- uals there was active inflammation but in only one of these was the diagnosis made on endoscopic appearances. Histological criteria important for the diagnosis of duodenitis are discussed. The number of plasma cells in different biopsy specimens from subjects not showing histological signs of inflammation was variable.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastric Mixing and Emptying Physiology > Digestive > Digestive
    Gastric Mixing and Emptying Physiology > Digestive > Digestive GASTRIC MIXING AND EMPTYING: FINAL STAGES OF DIGESTION SUMMARY Key Functions of the Stomach (Review) • Temporary storage to slow food transit to the small intestine and maximize nutrient absorption. • Physical Breakdown (like in the mouth) • Chemical Breakdown of proteins into their amino acids (at the same time that salivary amylase from the mouth continues to breakdown carbohydrates in the stomach). Three Gastric Phases (Review) 1. Filling, in which food enters the stomach through the gastroesophageal sphincter. 2. Mixing, in which peristaltic contractions churn the food while the gastric lining secretes juices to produce chyme. 3. Emptying, in which peristaltic contractions propel chyme into the small intestine. Mixing Phase – In Depth • Peristalsis – contractions of circular smooth muscle, move from fundus to antrum – Pushes the stomach's contents towards the pyloric sphincter. – Facilitates physical breakdown of food • Pyloric sphincter almost closed – Forces the chyme to spill backwards into the antrum (stomach's body) and continues mixing. Exocrine Cells of Stomach • Located in tubular gastric glands that comprise gastric pits – Epithelial cells at entrance of gastric pits: secrete thick mucus – Mucous layer – Submucosa layer • Secrete products into stomach lumen • Secretions convert food to chyme Exocrine Cell Types • Mucous cells (mucous neck cells): secrete alkaline, bicarbonate mucus, which protects our stomach wall from erosion 1 / 7 in an acidic luminal environment. • Chief cells: secrete pepsinogen, an inactive enzyme that, once activated, breaks down proteins. • Pepsinogen is a zymogen – An inactive enzyme that, once activated, breaks down proteins. – A substance must convert to its active form, pepsin • Pepsin – Breaks down peptide bonds to promote chemical breakdown.
    [Show full text]
  • Aandp2ch25lecture.Pdf
    Chapter 25 Lecture Outline See separate PowerPoint slides for all figures and tables pre- inserted into PowerPoint without notes. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Introduction • Most nutrients we eat cannot be used in existing form – Must be broken down into smaller components before body can make use of them • Digestive system—acts as a disassembly line – To break down nutrients into forms that can be used by the body – To absorb them so they can be distributed to the tissues • Gastroenterology—the study of the digestive tract and the diagnosis and treatment of its disorders 25-2 General Anatomy and Digestive Processes • Expected Learning Outcomes – List the functions and major physiological processes of the digestive system. – Distinguish between mechanical and chemical digestion. – Describe the basic chemical process underlying all chemical digestion, and name the major substrates and products of this process. 25-3 General Anatomy and Digestive Processes (Continued) – List the regions of the digestive tract and the accessory organs of the digestive system. – Identify the layers of the digestive tract and describe its relationship to the peritoneum. – Describe the general neural and chemical controls over digestive function. 25-4 Digestive Function • Digestive system—organ system that processes food, extracts nutrients, and eliminates residue • Five stages of digestion – Ingestion: selective intake of food – Digestion: mechanical and chemical breakdown of food into a form usable by
    [Show full text]
  • Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa of the Ileum
    Cases and Techniques Library (CTL) E423 because of various inflammatory or peptic processes [1]. Heterotopic gastric mucosa of the ileum HGM is usually clinically silent and does not require treatment; however, surgical intervention can be considered in patients with complications such as bleeding or intestinal obstruction [1]. Therefore, al- though HGM of the ileum is extremely rare, it should be considered in the differ- ential diagnosis of ileal polypoid lesions. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CCL_1AC_2AF Competing interests: None Chi-Ming Tai1, I-Wei Chang2, Hsiu-Po Wang3 1 Department of Internal Medicine Pathology, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou Fig. 1 Colonoscopic views of the terminal ileum showing several polypoid lesions, measuring 0.3– 0.8cm, with surface ulceration. University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 2 Department of Pathology, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 3 Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan References 1 Boybeyi O, Karnak I, Güçer S et al. Common characteristics of jejunal heterotopic gastric tissue in children: a case report with review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: e19– e22 2 Yu L, Yang Y, Cui L et al. Heterotopic gastric Fig. 2 Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained images of the biopsy specimens taken from the polypoid mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract: preval- lesions showing: a mucinous glands in the lamina propria (arrow), which resemble the pyloric glands of ence, histological features, and clinical char- the stomach (original magnification ×100); b higher power view of the mucinous glands (original acteristics. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: magnification×400). 138–144 3 Hammers YA, Kelly DR, Muensterer OJ et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Histology and Histochemistry of the Gastric Glands of Cats and Dogs
    Okajimas Folia Anat. Jpn., 67 (4): 249-256, October 1990 Comparative Histology and Histochemistry of the Gastric Glands of Cats and Dogs By Taizo SHIBATA, Masatake IMAI, Keiichi MORIGUCHI and Yoshihiko TAKADA Department of Anatomy, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada-machi, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa, 920-02 Japan -Received for Publication, March 23, 1990- Key words: Gastric glands, Comparative studies, Cat, Dog Summary: We performed histological and histochemical investigations on the gastric glands of cats and dogs. So-called cardiac glands in the cat and dog have a small number of the parietal cells and the PAS-positive glandular cells in the base of these glands contain fine pepsinogen granules. Consequently, we consider them as undifferentiated gastric glands, and can find no differences between these glands in both animals. The immature chief cells in the cat gastric glands are distributed not only in the glandular body but also in the base of the glands and contain sialomucin, and weak and strong acid mucopolysaccharides. The mature chief cells in cat and dog gastric glands contain weak and strong acid mucopolysaccharides. The gastric gland region of the dog is divided into clear and dark zones, and structural differences between the two zones are recognizable. Namely, the chief cells in the glandular base in the clear zone are somewhat undifferentiated, while the chief cells in the middle and lower parts of the glandular body and those in the glandular base in the dark zone are perfectly differentiated. The structure of the gastric glands in the fundic and greater and lesser curvature regions in the cat is very similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Stomach, Small Intestine (Duodenum, Jejunum and Ileum), and Large Intestine (Cecum, Colon, Rectum, Anal Canal, and Appendix)
    Alimentary Canal: Is subdivided into: esophagus, stomach, small intestine (duodenum, jejunum and ileum), and large intestine (cecum, colon, rectum, anal canal, and appendix). General Architecture Of the alimentary canal 1- Mucosa: Mucosa a- Epithelium b-Lamina propria (contains lymph follicles) c-Muscularis mucosa some times called muscularis interna. 2- Submucosa: it contains submucosal plexus also called Meissner's plexus 3- Muscularis externa. a- inner circular. b-outer longitudinal. Auerbach’s (myenteric) plexus in between the 2 layers Muscularis externa 4- Adventitia (C.T ) or serosa ; C.T covered by Peritoneum ( a double layers of simple squamous epithelium or simply mesothelium ) ESOPHAGUS 1 - mucosa: 5 - epithelium of the mucosa. 6 - lamina propria of the mucosa. 8 - glands in the lamina propria. 7 - muscularis mucosae. 2 - submucosa 3 - muscularis Externa 4 - adventitia Mucosa Submucosa Muscularis Serosa or Externa adventitia Epithelial Lining: 1-Connective tissue Usually 2 smooth muscle Serosa is C.T. covered by Non-Keratinized containing blood vessels, layers: mesothelium (simple Stratified Squamous nerves, glands. Inner circular layer. squamous epithelium) in the Epithelium. Outer longitudinal layer. abdominal part of the Auerbach’s(myenteric) esophagus. or adventitia if Lamina propria: C.T. 2-Meissner’s plexus of plexus in between the 2 there is no mesothelium. nerve fibers and nerve layers. Q: the esophagus mainly Muscularis mucosae: cells. covered by which layer? Few layers of smooth Adventitia. muscle fibers. STOMACH It has 4 regions: cardia, fundus, body and pylorus. Mucosa has folds, known as rugae that disappear in the distended cardiac stomach. Fundus of Stomach the body of the stomach has the same histological structures of the fundus Mucosa The surface of the stomach is lined by a simple columnar epithelium(mucus-secreting cells) whose cells are called 1- surface mucous cells.
    [Show full text]