Determination of Phosphine and Other Fumigants in Air Samples by Thermal

Journal of Chromatography A, 1217 (2010) 8298–8307

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Chromatography A

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chroma

Determination of phosphine and other fumigants in air samples by thermal desorption and 2D heart-cutting gas chromatography with synchronous SIM/Scan mass spectrometry and ﬂame photometric detection

Svea Fahrenholtz a,∗, Heinrich Hühnerfuss b, Xaver Baur c, Lygia Therese Budnik a a Institute for Occupational Medicine and Maritime Medicine, Division of Occupational Toxicology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hamburg, Marckmannstraße 129b, 20539 Hamburg, Germany b Department of Chemistry, Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King Platz 6, 20146 Hamburg, Germany c Institute for Occupational Medicine and Maritime Medicine, Chair for Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hamburg, Seewartenstraße 10, 20459 Hamburg, Germany article info abstract

Article history: Fumigants and volatile industrial chemicals are particularly hazardous to health when a freight con- Received 6 July 2010 tainer is fumigated or the contaminated material is introduced into its enclosed environment. Phosphine Received in revised form is now increasingly used as a fumigant, after bromomethane – the former fumigant of choice – has been 27 September 2010 banned by the Montreal Protocol. We have enhanced our previously established thermal desorption–gas Accepted 25 October 2010 chromatography–mass spectrometry (TD-GC–MS) method by integrating a second gas chromatographic Available online 31 October 2010 dimension and a flame photometric detector to allow the simultaneous detection of phosphine and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), providing a novel application. A thermal desorption system is cou- Keywords: Fumigant pled to a two dimensional gas chromatograph using both mass spectrometric and flame photometric Phosphine detection (TD-2D–GC–MS/FPD). Additionally, the collection of mass spectrometric SIM and Scan data Thermal desorption has been synchronised, so only a single analysis is now sufficient for qualitative scanning of the whole Simultaneous detection sample and for sensitive quantification. Though detection limits for the herewith described method are Freight container slightly higher than in the previous method, they are in the low ␮Lm−3 range, which is not only below Heart-cutting gas chromatography the respective occupational exposure and intervention limits but also allows the detection of residual contamination after ventilation. The method was developed for the separation and identification of 44 volatile substances. For 12 of these compounds (bromomethane, iodomethane, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichlorethane, benzene, tetrachloromethane, 1,2-dichloropropane, toluene, trichloronitromethane, ethyl benzene, phosphine, carbon disulfide) the method was validated as we chose the target compounds due to their relevance in freight container handling. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction and mills is regulated by the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation (UN FAO), although the implementation, compliance Fumigation is a method of pest control in the course of which and monitoring varies considerably throughout the world [1,2]. buildings or containers are completely ﬁlled with gaseous pesti- Current methods for routine monitoring of residual fumigants cides or fumigants such as phosphine to suffocate or poison the in treated areas are usually too speciﬁc or not sensitive enough pests within. In particular, it is used during processing of goods to detect hazardous substances at and below their recommended to be imported or exported to prevent transfer of exotic organ- exposure levels [1]. Consequently, many incidents of accidental isms. In order to circumvent personal injury, thorough aeration exposure have left persons affected and gravely ill for the rest of has to take place and air samples from the inside of closed fumi- their lives. Another problem is the wide variety of substances that gated rooms or containers have to be analysed prior to allowing may be present [2,3], which include not only fumigation agents personnel access for control or discharge purposes. Fumigation for but also many industrial chemicals that permeate the goods and the quarantine and phytosanitary treatment of cargo, storehouses their packaging [1,2]. The increasing adoption of novel, more effec- tive and cheaper fumigants for application means that a detection strategy must be suitable for sensitive screening as well as for the

∗ detection of speciﬁc target analytes. Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 40428457542. Bromomethane has been the insecticide of choice, but is being E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (S. Fahrenholtz). phased out after the Montreal Protocol recognized its strong ozone

0021-9673/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.085 S. Fahrenholtz et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 1217 (2010) 8298–8307 8299 depletion properties and increasingly phosphine is chosen as a In the present work, a method to detect phosphine along with replacement [3–5]. VOCs in container air samples using a thermal desorption system Phosphine is a popular insecticide for the fumigation of food, coupled to a two dimensional gas chromatograph with mass spec- tobacco, and natural products during shipment in freight contain- trometric and flame photometric detection (TD-2D–GC–MS/FPD) ers or bulk carriers and during storage in ware houses and mills is presented. By incorporating simultaneous collection of SIM and [3,6,7]. Now, phosphine is also increasingly used as a post-harvest Scan data, a single analysis is sufficient for qualitative screening and application for dried figs, post-harvest and quarantine treatment quantitation of all target compounds. We have applied the method of almonds, and post-harvest disinfection of citrus fruits [8–10], to a set of 53 freight container air samples for the measurement of although insect resistance is expected to limit its efficiency in future phosphine in a complex mixture of various unknown VOCs. [3,7]. The antifungal properties of phosphine have also been inves- tigated and discussed [11,12] making phosphine an even more attractive fumigant for transported commodities. 2. Experimental Only a few techniques for the sampling and analysis of air- borne phosphine have been discussed in the recent literature, 2.1. Reagents, supplies and equipment namely: reactive sorption on silver nitrate impregnated tubes with subsequent elution followed by ICP-AES (inductively cou- A certified test mixture of 39 compounds, each about pled plasma atomic emission spectrometry) analysis [13], cryo 100 ␮Lm−3,1 in the gas phase was purchased from Scott (Scott focussing with subsequent GC–ICP–MS (gas chromatography with Specialty Gasses, PA, USA). Additionally, certified standard gases of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) analysis [14], GC- bromomethane, phosphine and sulfuryl fluoride, 50 mL m−3 each, NPD (gas chromatography with nitrogen phosphorus detector) were obtained from Linde (Linde AG, Gases Division Germany, Pul- analysis [15], SIFT-MS (Single Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry) lach, Germany). determination [16] or GC-TSD (gas chromatography thermionic Analytical grade liquid compounds, benzene, carbon disul- specific detection) analysis [17], direct injection with packed col- fide, 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloropropane, dichloromethane, umn gas chromatography with alkali flame ionisation detection ethyl benzene, iodomethane, toluene, tetrachloromethane and [18] or Real-Time Monitoring with Electrochemical Detectors inter- trichloronitromethane, were purchased from Fluka Analytical faced by Radio Telemetry [19]. The unequivocal disadvantage of (Fluka Analytical/Sigma–Aldrich Switzerland, Buchs, Switzerland). these methods is that they confine the analysis to phosphine only Three different sorbent focusing traps with varying sorbent fill- (or sometimes additional hydrides) and they restrict the appli- ings in appropriate quartz glass tubes (0.012 m length, 2.9 mm cations to situations where the presence of phosphine is already outer diameter, 1 mm internal diameter at the inlet/outlet end and known. Since phosphine is increasingly used as fumigant for freight 2 mm internal diameter at the other end) were evaluated: graphi- containers, but its use is hardly ever declared [1,2], a more compre- tised carbon black, carbon molecular sieve (U-T15ATA); graphitised hensive method is needed that allows the simultaneous analysis carbon black, silica gel (U-T14H2S); porous polymer, graphitised and detection of any potential volatile contaminant. However, carbon black, molecular sieve (U-T5O3F), and were supplied by due to poor sensitivity for phosphine in mass selective detection, Markes International (Markes International, Llantrisant, UK). A which is the best choice for the analysis of VOCs and screening for Vacu-CaseTM vacuum pump was used for taking sample volumes novel fumigants and other volatile contaminants, a need for a new of 1 L in Tedlar® air sampling bags (both Analyt MTC, Müllheim, method, sufficiently sensitive for both, VOCs and phosphine, has Germany). emerged. The two-dimensional, heart-cutting gas chromatography described in this work provides a practical solution. Initial sepa- 2.2. Instrumentation ration of VOCs from each other and from phosphine takes place on the first dimension column. The phosphine peak is then A Markes (Markes International Limited, Llantrisant, UK) ther- transferred to the second dimension column which elutes to a mal desorption system was used. The system consists of a sampling flame photometric detector in phosphorus mode. A wide variety device (Markes MCS06 Air server multichannel sampler) and a ther- of volatile substances can be screened by mass spectrometric mal desorber (Markes UNITY thermal desorber), connected to a detection, while phosphine can be sensitively analysed by specific 6890N gas chromatographic system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) flame photometric detection. via a transfer line (consisting of uncoated fused silica placed in an Thermal desorption coupled to GC–MS is often used for the anal- isolated and heated sheath), connected to the GC column by a glass ysis of air samples [20–22]. The samples are either collected by press fitting. active sampling on sorbent tubes and analysed by dual stage des- A Deans switch, incorporated within the GC System, allows orption (by desorption from the tube and refocusing on a cold trap heart-cutting two dimensional applications. For this purpose, two and final desorption from the cold trap to the GC column) or the different detectors were attached to the GC: a 5975 mass spec- samples are collected in canisters or Tedlar bags and the analytes trometer and a 6850 flame photometric detector (both Agilent, are directly focussed on the cold trap. Cold traps may be cryogeni- Santa Clara, CA, USA). The effluent from the first column, a cally or electronically cooled by a Peltier element. In the current 30 m × 0.25 mm HP-1MS column with 1 ␮m coating (Agilent, Santa study, we employed Tedlar bag sampling, where the analytes were Clara, CA, USA), which is connected to the injecting transfer line, directly focussed on an electronically cooled trap. was either sent to the MS via a restrictor tubing of deactivated fused Conventional GC–MS analytics uses the Scan mode for scanning silica or to a second column, a 25 m × 0.32 mm Varian (Paolo Alto, the sample extracts for expected and unexpected substances as CA, USA) PoraPLOT Q column, which elutes to the FPD. a qualitative analysis while the SIM mode yields good sensitivity for quantitative analysis of the target compounds. Newer instru- ments, like the Agilent 5975 Mass Spectrometer Series, reduce 1 −3 −3 −3 −3 the time-consuming effort by consolidating the collection of SIM Conversion factors from ␮Lm (mL m )to␮gm (mg m ) for the target compounds at 23 ◦C (laboratory temperature): Phosphine: 1.4, dichloromethane: and Scan into a single measurement step. Careful parameter set- 3.50, bromomethane: 3.91, carbon disulfide: 3.13, 1,2-dichloroethane: 4.07, ting ensures an imperceptible loss in chromatographic and spectral 1,2-dichloropropane: 4.65, toluene: 3.79, benzene: 3.21, ethyl benzene: 4.37, quality [23,24]. trichloronitromethane: 6.76, tetrachloromethane: 6.33, iodomethane: 5.84. Download English Version: https://daneshyari.com/en/article/1203458

Download Persian Version:

https://daneshyari.com/article/1203458

Daneshyari.com