DOCSLIB.ORG

Ancient History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ancient History ANCIENT HISTORY The Decline of Sparta The decline of Sparta in 371BC was the conclusion of numerous characteristics of the ancient Spartan civilisation. Though the Spartan people where seen as particularly laconic their history certainly speaks to many, the story of the famous unstoppable Spartan army, particularly Leonidas and his 300 at the battle Thermopylae. Sparta occupied the central most finger in the area of Peloponnesus but was isolated due to the location within a valley of the Taygetus Mountains. Due to this isolation Sparta governed its society as it wished, with no intervention from any outsider, however no power dared to challenge Sparta due to the merciless army produced by Sparta after the first Messenian war in 640BC. This Army, as well as the entirety of Spartan society was based upon a number of systems that all revolved around the Spartans new but eventual first love, battle. Systems; such as the Agogae, Syssitia, Government as well as social values were created to promote Sparta and to maintain and safeguard values at all cost. Change was as abhorrent as military weakness. The birth of Sparta varies between sources however the Spartan role in warfare is definite. Sparta participated in the first Messenian wars and this was what ultimately created the Sparta known throughout the world. During this war the Spartans fought for conquest and enslaved the Messenian people that were then known as Helots. Spartans became dependant on her slaves as they allowed the foot soldiers (hoplites) to train as they performed all the menial tasks and they kept Sparta economically sound. Although slaves helped Sparta prosper as a fighting force, they were also a cloud hanging over the Spartan head that was always watched in case of an uprising. After the remainder of the Messenian wars the Spartans fought for glory and alliance. From 550-600BC Sparta battled with Argos and Tegea but she only asked them for an alliance, which eventuated in the founding of the Peloponnesian league, a fighting force which was ultimately joined by Megara and Corinth. After the Peloponnesian wars the hegemony of Sparta was ill received by the Greeks, particularly Athens and Thebes as they viewed Sparta as ill-equipped and lacking in foresight, motivation and judgement, particularly as their governmental system differed greatly from their own. Between the approximate dates of 431 and 400BC Sparta became a first power city-state with the best fighting force in Greece. She maintained her hold until 371BC at the battle of Leuctra. Sparta’s decline was quick following the Battle of Leuctra, but the weaknesses in her social political and economic sections became evident prior to the date. Sparta’s personality in battle is unequalled by any other ancient nation and their style of government and citizenship were equally eccentric. The Spartan government was extremely unique as it utilised elements of democracy, oligarchy and diarchy, not that those who founded the system designed it so at the time. If you look at the governmental arrangement the system was mainly oligarchic as the system greatly underestimated the masses and relied on an elite few, the five members of the Ephorate and the thirty members of the Georusia, two of which were Kings. The Georusia deliberated all bills sent through the government and acted as a court of justice but all the power lied with the Ephorate as they could summon the Kings to court, declare war on helots and foreign threats and were in charge of the entire training system forming the children of Sparta. The Ephorate checked on every aspect of Spartan society and the Spartan citizens in the Apella judged the Ephorate after their one-year term but they could be held accountable at the end of their term. Here in the government we see the first weakness of Spartan society, the need for numbers. The only citizens (Homoioi) who were recognised were pure born Spartan males who had completed the Agogae but at the height of Spartan rule there were approximately 10,000 Homoioi compared to 50,000-60,000 Perieoki and another 100,000 helot slaves, and the government could only survive with enough citizens to fill the Ephorate, Georusia, Apella and the dual kingship. The Spartan system relied on control, the homoioi controlled the helots and the state controlled the homoioi. Therefore due to the limited of actual citizens Sparta struggled to maintain their hold with such few numbers and had to adjust their lifestyle to do so as they had to fill the roles in the government and maintain control of the helots. Every year the Spartans would declare war on the helots to keep their numbers under control and outside this war any helot who seemed to have some intelligence was secretly put to death, in fear of an uprising. This weakness of lack of numbers transferred onto the battlefield and plays a particularly large role in Sparta’s decline after the Peloponnesian war. As formerly mentioned Sparta was extremely isolated, the closest settlement being a sea town, which was inhabited by Spartan perieoki or ‘dwellers around’. Spartans were therefore very wary of any outsiders that dared to enter their city. Barry Strauss of Cornwell University comments that the Spartans felt they were a ‘state constantly under siege’ and that ‘security was paramount’. This xenophobia transpired into many aspects of Spartan life particularly as the Spartan army was founded from the fear of losing to an imposing city-state. The education system for the Spartan army was called the Agogae and started at age seven til thirty, arrival upon this age men became full foot soldiers, hoplites and full citizens, homoioi. In the Agogae the children were trained to never respond to pain and that to die in battle was ultimate glory. The Agogae was based on brutality not only in terms of warfare but also of childhood as older children were employed to inflict punishment on the younger students, however upon reaching full homoioi status the army functioned on the principal of brotherhood and unity, which seems a great contradiction within the system. In terms of an education system the Agogae was a great strength of Sparta as it created equality and unity between all Spartan men, which enabled them to fight as an impenetrable unit. The Spartans favourite battle formation, the phalanx relied on strength and trust, which was developed through the Syssitia and Agogae. This unit utilised perieoki villagers in dire situations to support their ranks filled with hoplites. In many battles this style of unification brought the Spartans to victory even if not it the oppositions terms, even if it was just to die in battle. The untrained soldiers were positioned of the left side of the Spartan phalanx as this paired the most experienced soldiers in the enemy’s ranks, killing the ‘inferiors’ and tiring the experienced men of the opposition. The phalanx relied not only on careful matching of opponents but as a man fell in the front row his spot had to be filled or the phalanx would fall. This worked well when the Spartans were fighting with their own but when they worked in the Peloponnesian league with less trained men from other city-states the holes from men lost were not filled as rapidly, allowing the enemy to penetrate the phalanx. As the Spartans believed they were superior to all who were not Spartan born as they were descendents form Heracles or modern day Hercules they were reluctant to recognise any others. Spartans also had cult followings towards Leonidas, the king who led the 300. The Spartans felt they were superior and right in all ways. The Spartans idea of superiority was a catalyst for their inability to accept change to tactics and to accept other fighting forces was a major liability for the Spartans. After losing 300 at Thermopylae Sparta continued to fight and in 371BC joined forces with the Boeotians to fight the Thebans at the battle of Leuctra. At this battle we witness many of the Spartan weaknesses compiling to create extremely bad odds for the Spartan campaign. The Spartans were so few in numbers and refused to integrate with the inferior soldiers. This resulted in the segregation in the configuration of the phalanx; the Spartans were on the right side of the phalanx (strong side), the Thebans on the left side (weak side) and the perieoki and smaller forces in the centre. The segregation made for three small armies fighting separately instead of one force. Ultimately the Spartan-Boeotian force lost and they suffered heavy casualties but depending on which source is used the number ranges from 400 to over 4000. After the battle of Leuctra the Spartans still had citizens left so it was not the death of all Spartans that ended her reign. After the battle the numbers of hoplites were to few to retain the old social structure and this led to helot revolts and their eventual freedom after 100 years of enslavement. Sparta was therefore reduced to a second-hand power as they had too small a number to retain their governmental system and their armed forces. They also had no slaves to perform everyday tasks for them so they were not free to maintain their elite physical fitness. Here we see the weakness in the Spartan society create its collapse. The Spartan reliance on numbers, slaves and their armed forces left them with no support to fall upon when they lost their first full scale land battle. Despite this Sparta still existed for two centuries until under the rule of King Agis III the Spartans stood against a Macedonian force led by General Antipater in 331BC.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • De Theognide Megarensi. Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara. a Bilingual Edition
    FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE De Theognide Megarensi Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara – A Bilingual Edition – Translated by R. M. Kerr THE NIETZSCHE CHANNEL Friedrich Nietzsche De Theognide Megarensi Nietzsche on Theognis of Megara A bilingual edition Translated by R. M. Kerr ☙ editio electronica ❧ _________________________________________ THE N E T ! " # H E # H A N N E $ % MM&' Copyright © Proprietas interpretatoris Roberti Martini Kerrii anno 2015 Omnia proprietatis iura reservantur et vindicantur. Imitatio prohibita sine auctoris permissione. Non licet pecuniam expetere pro aliquo, quod partem horum verborum continet; liber pro omnibus semper gratuitus erat et manet. Sic rerum summa novatur semper, et inter se mortales mutua vivunt. augescunt aliae gentes, aliae invuntur, inque brevi spatio mutantur saecla animantum et quasi cursores vitai lampada tradiunt. - Lucretius - - de Rerum Natura, II 5-! - PR"#$CE %e &or' presente( here is a trans)ation o* #rie(rich Nietzsche-s aledi!tionsarbeit ./schoo) e0it-thesis12 *or the "andesschule #$orta in 3chu)p*orta .3axony-$nhalt) presente( on 3epte4ber th 15678 It has hitherto )arge)y gone unnotice(, especial)y in anglophone Nietzsche stu(- ies8 $t the ti4e though, the &or' he)pe( to estab)ish the reputation o* the then twenty year o)( Nietzsche and consi(erab)y *aci)itate( his )ater acade4ic career8 9y a)) accounts, it &as a consi(erab)e achie:e4ent, especial)y consi(ering &hen it &as &ri;en: it entai)e( an e0pert 'no&)e(ge, not =ust o* c)assical-phi)o)ogical )iterature, but also o* co(ico)ogy8 %e recent =u(ge4ent by >"+3"+ .2017<!!2< “It is a piece that, ha( Nietzsche ne:er &ri;en another &or(, &ou)( ha:e assure( his p)ace, albeit @uite a s4a)) one, in the history o* Ger4an phi)o)ogyB su4s the 4atter up quite e)o@uently8 +ietzsche )ater continue( his %eognis stu(ies, the sub=ect o* his Crst scho)ar)y artic)e, as a stu(ent at Leip,ig, in 156 D to so4e e0tent a su44ary o* the present &or' D a critical re:ie& in 156!, as &e)) as @uotes in se:eral )e;ers *ro4 1567 on.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ubiquity of the Cretan Archer in Ancient Warfare
    1 ‘You’ll be an archer my son!’ The ubiquity of the Cretan archer in ancient warfare When a contingent of archers is mentioned in the context of Greek and Roman armies, more often than not the culture associated with them is that of Crete. Indeed, when we just have archers mentioned in an army without a specified origin, Cretan archers are commonly assumed to be meant, so ubiquitous with archery and groups of mercenary archers were the Cretans. The Cretans are the most famous, but certainly not the only ‘nation’ associated with a particular fighting style (Rhodian slingers and Thracian peltasts leap to mind but there are others too). The long history of Cretan archers can be seen in the sources – according to some stretching from the First Messenian War right down to the fall of Constantinople in 1453. Even in the reliable historical record we find Cretan archer units from the Peloponnesian War well into the Roman period. Associations with the Bow Crete had had a long association with archery. Several Linear B tablets from Knossos refer to arrow-counts (6,010 on one and 2,630 on another) as well as archers being depicted on seals and mosaics. Diodorus Siculus (5.74.5) recounts the story of Apollo that: ‘as the discoverer of the bow he taught the people of the land all about the use of the bow, this being the reason why the art of archery is especially cultivated by the Cretans and the bow is called “Cretan.” ’ The first reliable references to Cretan archers as a unit, however, which fit with our ideas about developments in ancient warfare, seem to come in the context of the Peloponnesian War (431-404 BCE).
    [Show full text]
  • Why Does Plato's Laws Exist?
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Why Does Plato's Laws Exist? Harold Parker University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Parker, Harold, "Why Does Plato's Laws Exist?" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2515. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2515 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2515 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Why Does Plato's Laws Exist? Abstract If the ideal city described at length in Plato’s Republic is a perfect and philosophically attractive encapsulation of Plato’s political philosophy, why does Plato go on to write the Laws – which also describes an ideal city, albeit one very different from the Republic? The fundamental challenge of scholarship concerning the Laws is to supply a comprehensive account of the dialogue that explains all aspects of it while also distinguishing the Laws from the Republic in a way that does not devalue the Laws as a mere afterthought to the Republic. Past attempts at meeting this challenge, I argue, can be classified under the headings of the democratic, legal, and demiurgic approaches. Although each is prima facie plausible, each also faces its own set of problems. Furthermore, none are truly capable of explaining the Laws in its full specificity; the intricate array of customs, regulations, and practices making up the life of the city described form a complex totality not reducible to the concept of democracy, the rule of law, or demiurgy.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinner in Utopia: Why Did Plato Propose “Amazing and Frightening” Meals in Common?
    Dinner in Utopia: Why did Plato Propose “Amazing and Frightening” Meals in Common? Michael Jackson & Damian Grace UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY Citation: Jackson & Grace, “Dinner in Utopia: Why did Plato Propose ‘Amazing and Frightening’ Meals in Common?”, Spaces of Utopia: An Electronic Journal, 2nd series, no. 3, 2014, pp. 9-26 <http://ler.letras.up.pt > ISSN 1646-4729. “Let one open any book of history, from Herodotus to our own day, and he will see that, without even excepting conspiracies, not a single great event has occurred which has not been conceived, prepared, and carried out at a feast,” so said Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin in the Philosopher in the Kitchen (1981[1825]: 54). Scholars of course know the faculty club and the conference dinner, where many events have been planned. While Plato consistently recommended common meals, syssitia (literally “eating together”), and Aristotle accepted this one feature of Plato’s political program, their recommendations of these public meals as political practices have been treated in a perfunctory manner, limited to military purposes (e.g., Finer 1997: 338 and de Mesquita et al., 2004: 174). In later utopian theory and practice, Thomas More, Tomasso Campanella and William Morris, among other utopian theorists, incorporated such meals, as have utopian communities from Oenida to the Kibbutzim, all to little comment. Insofar as the seed for the practice is found in Plato, a close study of his recommendation of common meals enhances our understanding of what such meals can offer. Why in The Laws (780a-d) did Plato recommend meals in common and why did he say that they were “amazing” and “frightening,” and perhaps not to be mentioned?1 To better understand Plato’s approach to syssitia this essay summarizes common meals in the context of classical Greece, examines Plato’s discussion of political dining, emphasizes the role of women in common meals in Plato’s political theory, considers the role of these meals in the second-best ideal commonwealth of the Laws, and draws several conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • First Printing: January 2009 Copyright © 2009 By
    First printing: January 2009 Copyright © 2009 by Larry and Marion Pierce. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or re- produced in any manner whatsoever without written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations in articles and reviews. For information write: Master Books®, P.O. Box 726, Green Forest, AR 72638. ISBN-13: 978-0-89051-556-3 ISBN-10: 0-89051-556-5 Library of Congress Number: 2008940813 Cover by Diana Bogardus Printed in the United States of America Please visit our website for other great titles: www.masterbooks.net For information regarding author interviews, please contact the publicity department at (870) 438-5288. The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended. Prefixed by A Short Chronicle from the Earliest History of Europe, to the Conquest of Persia by Alexander the Great. By Sir Isaac Newton. London: Printed for J. Tonson in the Strand, and J. Osborn and T. Longman in Pater-noster Row. MDCCXXVIII. Revised Edition by Larry and Marion Pierce, 2008. ® Table of Contents Preface to the Queen .....................................................................................................................................5 Notice to the Reader .....................................................................................................................................7 Introduction to the Short Chronology ........................................................................................................11 A Short Chronology from Earliest European History to Alexander the
    [Show full text]
  • Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 107 (1995) 60–68 © Dr
    MATTHEW P. J. DILLON THE LAKEDAIMONIAN DEDICATION TO OLYMPIAN ZEUS: THE DATE OF MEIGGS & LEWIS 22 (SEG 11, 1203A) aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 107 (1995) 60–68 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 60 THE LAKEDAIMONIAN DEDICATION TO OLYMPIAN ZEUS: THE DATE OF MEIGGS & LEWIS 22 (SEG 11, 1203A)1 [d°j]o Wãn[a]j Kron¤da{i} DeË ÉOlÊnpie kalÚn êgalma hil°Wo[i yu]mØi to›(l) Lakedaimon¤o[iw] “Accept Lord, Son of Kronos, Olympian Zeus, this fine statue From the Lakedaimonians with propitious spirit.” This inscription, an elegiac couplet, inscribed on a cylindrical statue-base discovered at Olympia,2 was made in thanksgiving by the Spartans to Zeus. The couplet is also recorded by Pausanias (5.24.3), who has removed the peculiarities of the dialect: d°jo ênaj Kron¤da ZeË ÉOlÊmpie kalÚn êgalma fllムyum“ to›w Lakedaimon¤oiw. The date of this inscription has long been a matter of dispute. Pausanias dates the inscription to the Second Messenian War,3 which would seem to be appropriate. The Spartans had subjugated the Messenians, or at least some of them, in the First Messenian War. The last Messenian victory in the Olympic festival took place in 736, which means that the Messenians stopped sending competitors from the date of that celebration, or very soon after, for after their defeat by the Spartans in the First Messenian War, they could no longer send competitors. Parker rejects this argument on analogy with modern nations in sporting competitions, that a lack of a victory from a certain date does not mean that the nation involved has ceased to exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Pausanias' Periegesis Akujärvi, Johanna
    Researcher, Traveller, Narrator : Studies in Pausanias' Periegesis Akujärvi, Johanna 2005 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Akujärvi, J. (2005). Researcher, Traveller, Narrator : Studies in Pausanias' Periegesis. Almqvist & Wiksell International. Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Studia Graeca et Latina Lundensia 12 Researcher, Traveller, Narrator Studies in Pausanias’ Periegesis Johanna Akujärvi Lund 2005 Almqvist & Wiksell International Stockholm/Sweden © 2005 Johanna Akujärvi Distributed by Almqvist & Wiksell International P.O. Box 7634 S-103 94 Stockholm Sweden Phone: + 46 8 790 38 00 Fax: + 46 8 790 38 05 E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 1100-7931 ISBN 91-22-02134-5 Printed in Sweden Media-Tryck, Lund University Lund 2005 To Daniel Acknowledgements There are a number of people to whom I wish to express my gratitude.
    [Show full text]
  • VALOUR, DUTY, SACRIFICE: SPARTA ‘In Sparta Are to Be Found Those Who Are Most Enslaved and Those Who Are the Most Free.’
    CHAPTER 2 VALOUR, DUTY, SACRIFICE: SPARTA ‘In Sparta are to be found those who are most enslaved and those who are the most free.’ CRITIAS OF ATHENS sample pages Spartan infantry in a formation called a phalanx. 38 39 CHAPTER 2 VALOUR, DUTY, SACRIFICE: SPARTA KEY POINTS KEY CONCEPTS OVERVIEW • At the end of the Dark Age, the Spartan polis emerged DEMOCRACY OLIGARCHY TYRANNY MONARCHY from the union of a few small villages in the Eurotas valley. Power vested in the hands Power vested in the hands A system under the control A system under the control • Owing to a shortage of land for its citizens, Sparta waged of all citizens of the polis of a few individuals of a non-hereditary ruler of a king war on its neighbour Messenia to expand its territory. unrestricted by any laws • The suppression of the Messenians led to a volatile slave or constitution population that threatened Sparta’s way of life, making the DEFINITION need for reform urgent. KEY EVENTS • A new constitution was put in place to ensure Sparta could protect itself from this new threat, as well as from tyranny. Citizens of the polis all A small, powerful and One individual exercises Hereditary rule passing 800 BCE • Sweeping reforms were made that transformed Sparta share equal rights in the wealthy aristocratic class complete authority over from father to son political sphere all aspects of everyday life Sparta emerges from the into a powerful military state that soon came to dominate Most citizens barred from Family dynasties claim without constraint Greek Dark Age the Peloponnese.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece Timeline
    Greece Timeline http://ancient-greece.org/resources/timeline.html Resources Greece Timeline Timeline Pictures Posters Teachers & Students 8000 BCE Mesolithic Period Desktop Wallpaper (8300-7000) Related Pages Earliest evidence of burials found in 7250 BCE Franchthi Cave in the Argolid, Greece Map of Ancient Grece Evidence of food producing economy, 7000 BCE Neolithic Period simple hut construction, and seafaring in (7000-3000 BCE) mainland Greece and the Aegean Explore More First "Megaron House" at Sesclo, in 5700 BCE central Greece Links: Alexander the Great Evidence of earliest fortifications at 3400 BCE Chronology Dimini, Greece The timeline of Greek 3000 BCE Mathematecians Houses of Vasiliki and Myrtos Aegean Bronze Age Messara Tholoi or Early Bronze Age Mathematecians born in House of Tiles at Lerna (3000-2000) Greece Minoan Prepalatial or: EMIA, EMIB Timeline of Greek (3000-2600 BCE) Drama Early Cycladic Culture Greek and Roman (3200-2000) Theater and Theatrical Early Helladic Period Masks Timeline (3000-2000) Full Chronology of Mathematics (including Greek mathematicians) 2600 BCE Minoan Prepalatial Period A Detailed Chronology of or: EMIIA, EMIIB, MMIII Greek History (2600-2000 BCE) A New Bronze Age Chronology (more) Destruction of Minoan settlements 2000 BCE Minoan Protopalatial The Thera (Santorini) Period Volcanic Eruption and or: MMIA, MMIB, MMI IA, the Absolute Chronology MMI IB, MMI IIA, MMI of the Aegean Bronze IIB, LMIA Early Age (1900-1700 BCE) Assiros Phases (Revised Early Middle Cycladic (2000-1600 BCE) chronology of
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Inscription, Its Political and Social Institutions and the Common Institutions of the Cretans
    Originalveroffentlichung in: E. Greco - M. Lombardo (eds.), La Grande Iscrizione di Gortyna. Centoventi anni dopo la scoperta. Atti del I Convegno Internazionale di Studi sulla Messara, Athen 2005, S. 175-194 THE GREAT INSCRIPTION, ITS POLITICAL AND SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND THE COMMON INSTITUTIONS OF THE CRETANS IS THERE SUCH AS THING AS CRETAN NOMIMA? METHODOLOGICAL CON­ SIDERATIONS In the eighth and seventh centuries Crete had been one of the most advanced regions in Greece. The Cretans adopted the alphabet very early; Cretan artists played a leading part in the development of Greek art, espe­ cially in the fields of metallurgy and stone sculpture; in the early seventh century they participated in colonisation, founding Gela together with the Rhodians; the Homeric hymn to Apollo associates the Cretans with the foundation of the sanctuary at Delphi. It is in this period of cosmopoli­ tanism and close contacts to the Orient, a period of a visible advance of trade, arts, and culture, that Crete seems to petrify. From the late seventh century onwards trade and arts do not disappear, but they certainly lost the innovative power they had had; the Cretan institutions do not keep pace with the developments in the rest of Greece; and although Crete was never isolated from the rest of Greece, its contacts with other Greek areas in the sixth and fifth centuries were not impressive. The decline of Crete as a cul­ tural pioneer in the Greek world goes hand in hand with the rise of its fame as a model of law and order. The Cretans did not any longer produce impressive works of art, but they produced more legal inscriptions than the 1 rest of Greece taken together.
    [Show full text]
  • Pindar and the Poetics of Autonomy: Authorial Agency in Pindar’S Fourth Pythian Ode
    I PINDAR AND THE POETICS OF AUTONOMY: AUTHORIAL AGENCY IN PINDAR’S FOURTH PYTHIAN ODE A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dennis Robert Alley May 2019 II ©2019 Dennis Robert Alley III PINDAR AND THE POETICS OF AUTONOMY: AUTHORIAL AGENCY IN PINDAR’S FOURTH PYTHIAN ODE Dennis Robert Alley Cornell University 2019 Over the last decade a growing number of scholars have questioned the veracity of the longstanding commission-fee model which placed the Greek lyric poet Pindar in the thrall of various aristocratic patrons to secure his pay. This seismic shift in our view on Pindar’s composition reveals manifold new questions to explore in its wake. What happens to our understanding of the 45 extant odes and extensive fragments, when, for example, angling for commission no longer mandates procrustean generic strictures? How do we understand praise poetry if not as exclusively solicited and sold? Where do we even begin examining the odes under this new model? Pindar and the Poetics of Autonomy suggests one ode in particular has suffered from the rigidity of scholarly expectations on commission and genre. In the corpus of Pindaric epinicia, Pythian Four, written around 462 for Arcesilaus the fourth of Cyrene, is conspicuously anomalous. At 299 exceptionally long lines, the poem is over twice as long as the next longest ode. While most epinicia devote considerable space in their opening and closing sections to celebrating the present victory, Pythian Four makes only one clear mention of it.
    [Show full text]