Southeastern Biology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Southeastern Biology SOUTHEASTERN BIOLOGY Volume 61 July, 2014 Number 3 ASB 75th Annual Meeting April 2-5, 2014 ASB ASB Converse College Spartanburg Community College ASB Spartanburg Methodist College ASB University of South Carolina Upstate Wofford College ASB Spartanburg, South Carolina ASB Abstracts of Papers and Posters Phifer Science Hall at Converse College ASB Home to the Departments of Biology and Chemistry ASB The Official Publication of The Association ofSoutheastern Biologists, Inc. http : //www. sebiologists.org SOUTHEASTERN BIOLOGY (ISSN 1533-8436) SOUTHEASTERN BIOLOGY (ISSN 1 533-8436) is published online quarterly in January, April, July, and October by the Association of Southeastern Biologists, Inc., P.O. Box 276, Elon, NC 27244-0276. Please send address changes to the SOUTHEASTERN BIOLOGY business manager, Tim Atkinson, Assoc, of SEB, P.O. Box 276, Elon, NC 27244-0276. All contributions, inquiries about missing back numbers and other matters should be addressed to the Journal Editor. News items should be sent to the News Editor. Send books to be reviewed to the Book Review Editor. Journal Editor James D. Caponetti, Division of Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-0830; 974-6841 Fax 974-4057; [email protected]. (865) ; (865) Associate Editor Sarah Noble, P.O. Box 640, Mobile, Alabama, 36601; (251) 295-4267; [email protected] . Web Editor Ashley B, Morris, Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN 494-7621 . 37132; (61 5) ; [email protected] News Editor Riccardo Fiorillo, School of Science and Technology, Georgia Gwinnett College, 1000 University Center Lane, Lawrenceville, GA 30043; (678) 464-9918; [email protected] . Book Review Co-Eds Christopher G. Brown, Dept, of Biology, Shorter College, Rome, GA 30161; (706) 233-7265; [email protected] . Jennifer Mandel, Dept, of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; (901) 678-5130; [email protected] . ASB Officers President Zack Murrell, Dept, of Biology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608; 828-262-2674; [email protected] . President-Elect Joey Shaw, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, TN 37403; (423) 425-4341; Fax (423) 425-2285; [email protected]. Vice President Ashley B. Morris, Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN 494-7621 . 371 32; (615) ; [email protected] Past President Donald H. Roush, Dept, of Biology, University of North Alabama, Florence, AL 35632; (256) 765-4435; Fax (256) 765-4430; [email protected] . Secretary Sarah Noble, P.O. Box 640, Mobile, Alabama, 36601; (251)295-4267; [email protected] . Treasurer Edgar B. Lickey, Department of Biology, Bridgewater College, Bridgewater, VA 22812; (540) 828-5426; [email protected] . Membership Officer Sarah Noble, P.O. Box 640, Mobile, Alabama, 36601; (251) 295-4267; [email protected] . Database Manager Chris Fleming, BDY Environmental, LLC, 2607 Westwood Drive, Nashville, TN 37204; (615) 460-9797; [email protected] . Archivist John Herr, Dept, of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208; (803) 777-8110; Fax (803) 777-4002; [email protected] . Executive Committee Members-at-Large 2015: JudyAwong-Taylor, School of Science and Technology, Georgia Gwinnett College, 1000 University Center Lane, Lawrenceville, GA 30043; (912) 441-4610; [email protected] . William Ensign, Dept, of Biology and Physics, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144; (770)499-3505; [email protected] . 2016: Edgar B. Lickey, Department of Biology, Bridgewater College, Bridgewater, VA 22812; (540) 828-5426; [email protected] . Conley K. McMullen, Dept, of Biology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807; (540) 568-3805; Fax (540) 568-3333; [email protected] . 2017: Riccardo Fiorillo, School of Science and Technology, Georgia Gwinnett College, 1000 University Center Lane, Lawrenceville, GA 30043; (678) 464-9918; [email protected] . Margaret J. Kovach, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, TN 37403; (423) 425-4397; Fax (423) 425-2285; [email protected] . Purpose The purpose of this association shall be to promote the advancement of biology as a science by encouraging research, the imparting of knowledge, the application of knowledge to the solution of biological problems, and the preservation of biological resources. The ASB has representation in Section G Committee of the AAAS. Varying types of membership are available to individuals and institutions. See inside back cover. Time and Place of Future Meetings 2015 April 1-4: Hosted by the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Meeting site is the Convention Center at the Marriott. Executive Committee Meeting 233 ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEASTERN BIOLOGISTS INTERIM EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING 14-15 SEPTEMBER 2013 CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE ATTENDANCE: 12 persons attended the meeting. NAME CAPACITY Zack Murrell President Joey Shaw Vice President Tim Atkinson Treasurer John Herr Archivist Bill Ensign EC Member-at-Large Conley K. McMullen EC Member-at-Large Ashley Morris Web Editor James Caponetti Journal Editor Patricia Cox Past-President's Council Representative Wayne Van Devender Chair, Meritorious Teaching Award Committee Terry Richardson Chair, Publications Committee Kirk Stowe Chair, Education Committee I. Call to Order and Welcome President Zack Murrell called the Executive Committee (EC) Meeting to order at 9:05 A.M. Zack welcomed everyone in attendance, and asked each individual to share one goal that he/she hoped to address at this meeting. II. Approval of the Executive Committee Meeting Minutes President Zack Murrell pointed out one correction to the minutes of the 13 April 2013 EC Meeting. A brief discussion on quorum followed, as only five voting members were present at the meeting. Presidential action was suggested so that the meeting could move forward. Zack determined that we would go forward with five voting members. Motion 1 . Terry Richardson made a motion that the minutes of the 13 April 2013 EC Meeting, as corrected, be approved. Bill Ensign seconded, and the motion carried. III. Reports from Officers, EC Members, and Appointed Position Chairs A) President - Zack Murrell gave a presentation on the current state of ASB that spanned a variety of topics. B) Vice-President - Joey Shaw reported that he has arranged for Henry Wilbur (UVA) to be the plenary speaker at the upcoming meeting in 2014 in Spartanburg, SC. Rebecca Cook and Howie Neufeld are looking into potential speakers for the 2015 meeting. 234 SE Biology, Vol. 61, No. 3, July, 2014 C) Secretary - Sarah Noble (no report). D) Treasurer, Business Manager - Tim Atkinson presented an overview of our organization’s current tax status (501 C3 status was revoked by IRS). Options for going forward were presented: 1) pursue reinstatement, 2) go forward as a for-profit organization (we would then owe taxes), 3) cease operations. Discussion followed. In May 2013, Tim discussed our options with Tax Resolutions Services. If we decide to pursue reinstatement, we would need to contract with TRS. Our current situation began when we failed to file Form 990. More discussion followed. If pursuing reinstatement, we would need to prove that we have maintained compliance. The IRS would want a list of all current officers/spouses and all former officers/spouses, as well as all financial information of officers. If we choose to go forward as for-profit, we would owe at least $104,311 (worst case scenario). We would need to increase our registration fees to pay taxes if we go forward as for-profit. Perhaps we will need to hire an attorney. Archivist John Herr suggested contacting the regional IRS officer face to face before hiring an attorney. Tim Atkinson agreed. Tim thanked President Zack Murrell for his support during this process. Tim reviewed the fiscal year 2012 finances with the EC via spreadsheet. Discussion followed regarding specifics of the report. The figures showed an ending balance of $65,567, and a net increase of $9,012 from 2012. E) Archivist - John Herr (archivist), Ken Shull (associate archivist), and Virginia Davis (assistant archivist) visited the ASB archives in Athens, GA on 6 September 2013. Included among the items left with the archives was the ASB Book of Fellows with the signature of our most recent Fellow, Peter Raven. John mentioned that the trip had been a good experience for all involved. F) Print Editor - Jim Caponetti mentioned that he will need to remove the statement of tax exempt status from Southeastern Biologist (SEB). Jim notified the EC that Cengage, one of our sponsors, has entered Chapter 11 status. Discussion followed. Patricia Cox complimented Jim on the October 2013 issue of SEB. Discussion followed regarding the status of an invited research paper. Jim requested specific information on the dates and host(s) of the 2016 meeting for posting. Zack Murrell affirmed that this info would be available for the January issue of SEB. G) Web Editor - Ashley Morris reported that she had updated the website information on officers and committees, and that the October 2013 issue of SEB had been posted. Ashley also informed the EC that information on the 2014 meeting was now available online. Discussion followed regarding what additional information should be posted regularly. This discussion will continue at the strategic planning meeting on Saturday. H) Book Editors - Jennifer Mandel and Chris Brown (no report). I)
Recommended publications
  • Especies Vegetales En Peligro, Su Distribución Y Estatus De Conservación De Los Ecosistemas Donde Se Presentan
    ESPECIES VEGETALES EN PELIGRO, SU DISTRIBUCIÓN Y ESTATUS DE CONSERVACIÓN DE LOS ECOSISTEMAS DONDE SE PRESENTAN ENDANGERED VEGETAL SPECIES, THEIR DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE ECOSYSTEMS IN WHICH THEY OCCUR Mario Humberto Royo-Márquez1, Alicia Melgoza-Castillo2 y Gustavo Quintana-Martínez2 RESUMEN En México, la norma oficial mexicana (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) integra especies de flora y fauna silvestres en riesgo, pero no especifica su distribución geográfica. Como base para la realización de planes de conservación en el estado de Chihuahua es importante identificar las plantas incluidas en dicha norma, otras que deberían integrarse por su distribución restringida y rareza, así como el estado de conservación de los ecosistemas donde se presentan. En este contexto, se revisó una base de datos de alrededor de 4 000 especies de la flora de la entidad; se consultó la literatura disponible; y se realizaron visitas a diversos herbarios. En total se documentaron 195 taxa, 59 con estatus según la NOM-059, pertenecientes a 40 géneros y 21 familias, de los cuales, 19 especies son endémicas para México. Además, se proponen 31 taxa de 23 géneros y nueve familias, para ser estudiadas y evaluar su posible incorporación en la Norma, ya que son endemismos locales o registros únicos para México. Se sugieren 105 especies consideradas como raras, incluidas en 76 géneros y 37 familias. Los bosques y pastizales presentan el mayor número de especies con estatus y la más grande superficie con vegetación secundaria, lo que indica que esos ecosistemas presentan diversos grados de deterioro. Se requieren estudios poblacionales de las especies propuestas para plantear estrategias de conservación y manejo sustentable de los ecosistemas donde se desarrollan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Short-Legged Andean Cosmetids Revisited: the Genus Libitia Simon
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: European Journal of Taxonomy Jahr/Year: 2020 Band/Volume: 0634 Autor(en)/Author(s): Medrano Miguel, Azara Ludson Neves de, Kury Adriano Brilhante Artikel/Article: The short-legged Andean cosmetids revisited: the genus Libitia Simon, 1879 with description of two new species (Opiliones, Cosmetidae) 1-25 European Journal of Taxonomy 634: 1–25 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.634 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2020 · Medrano M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:66AEE1D7-51BF-4583-9A19-947F61ECC7DE The short-legged Andean cosmetids revisited: the genus Libitia Simon, 1879 with description of two new species (Opiliones, Cosmetidae) Miguel MEDRANO 1,*, Ludson Neves de ÁZARA 2 & Adriano Brilhante KURY 3 1,2,3 Laboratório de Aracnologia, Departamento de Invertebrados, Museu Nacional/UFRJ, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20.940-040, Rio de Janeiro – RJ, Brazil. 1 Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 [email protected] 3 [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C7F7D4CF-F9B2-44AF-9F03-86278ADBD4F2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:4ECF193A-694C-43CE-8EE6-F197EDDA4414 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:60FAE1F8-87F7-4A5F-BE78-BEB25BC4F898 Abstract. The old genus Libitia Simon, 1879 of small Andean harvestmen is revisited. The monotypic genus Libitiella Roewer, 1947 is herein considered a junior subjective synonym of Libitia. Accordingly, Libitiella bipunctata (Sørensen, 1932) is restored to the combination Libitia bipunctata. The species Libitia cordata and Libitia bipunctata comb.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida
    Comparative functional morphology of attachment devices in Arachnida Vergleichende Funktionsmorphologie der Haftstrukturen bei Spinnentieren (Arthropoda: Arachnida) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Jonas Otto Wolff geboren am 20. September 1986 in Bergen auf Rügen Kiel, den 2. Juni 2015 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Stanislav N. Gorb _ Zweiter Gutachter: Dr. Dirk Brandis _ Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. Juli 2015 _ Zum Druck genehmigt: 17. Juli 2015 _ gez. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang J. Duschl, Dekan Acknowledgements I owe Prof. Stanislav Gorb a great debt of gratitude. He taught me all skills to get a researcher and gave me all freedom to follow my ideas. I am very thankful for the opportunity to work in an active, fruitful and friendly research environment, with an interdisciplinary team and excellent laboratory equipment. I like to express my gratitude to Esther Appel, Joachim Oesert and Dr. Jan Michels for their kind and enthusiastic support on microscopy techniques. I thank Dr. Thomas Kleinteich and Dr. Jana Willkommen for their guidance on the µCt. For the fruitful discussions and numerous information on physical questions I like to thank Dr. Lars Heepe. I thank Dr. Clemens Schaber for his collaboration and great ideas on how to measure the adhesive forces of the tiny glue droplets of harvestmen. I thank Angela Veenendaal and Bettina Sattler for their kind help on administration issues. Especially I thank my students Ingo Grawe, Fabienne Frost, Marina Wirth and André Karstedt for their commitment and input of ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxon Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Non-Native No. of Individuals/Abundance Notes Bees Hymenoptera Andrenidae Calliop
    Taxon Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Non-native No. of individuals/abundance Notes Bees Hymenoptera Andrenidae Calliopsis andreniformis Mining bee 5 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Apis millifera European honey bee X 20 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus griseocollis Brown belted bumble bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Bombus impatiens Common eastern bumble bee 12 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina calcarata Small carpenter bee 9 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina mikmaqi Small carpenter bee 4 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Ceratina strenua Small carpenter bee 10 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Melissodes druriella Small carpenter bee 6 Bees Hymenoptera Apidae Xylocopa virginica Eastern carpenter bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus affinis masked face bee 6 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus mesillae masked face bee 3 Bees Hymenoptera Colletidae Hylaeus modestus masked face bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Agapostemon virescens Sweat bee 7 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Augochlora pura Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Augochloropsis metallica metallica Sweat bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Halictus confusus Sweat bee 7 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Halictus ligatus Sweat bee 2 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum anomalum Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum ellissiae Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum laevissimum Sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum platyparium Cuckoo sweat bee 1 Bees Hymenoptera Halictidae Lasioglossum versatum Sweat bee 6 Beetles Coleoptera Carabidae Agonum sp. A ground beetle
    [Show full text]
  • New River Crayfish Range Wide Status Assessment
    New River Crayfish Range Wide Status Assessment William T. Russ, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, Division of Inland Fisheries, 645 Fish Hatchery Road, Marion, NC 28752 Zach J. Loughman, West Liberty University, Department of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Campus Service Center Box 139, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV 26074 Roger F. Thoma, Midwest Biodiversity Institute, Inc., 4673 Northwest Parkway, Hilliard, OH 43026 Brian T. Watson, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, 1132 Thomas Jefferson Road, Forest, VA 24551 Todd D. Ewing, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, Division of Inland Fisheries, 1721 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 Abstract: The New River crayfish, (Cambarus chasmodactylus), was described in 1966 from the East Fork of the Greenbrier River, West Virginia, and historically occurred throughout the New River Basin from the Greenbrier River sub-basin in West Virginia, upstream through Virginia, and into the headwaters of the South Fork New River in North Carolina. The New River crayfish was part of a federal listing species petition in 2010 and it is cur- rently being evaluated for listing as either threatened or endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act. In order to understand the current distribution and status of this species, a range-wide assessment was undertaken by various organizations and agencies in West Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. Biological information was summarized, including species description, habitat use, life history, and current distribution. All historical and recent collections were compared and spatially displayed using GIS software. The New River crayfish was collected in three 8-digit hydrologic unit codes (HUCs) and 14 counties in three states, with the majority of occurrences in the Upper New and Greenbrier River sub-basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnida, Opiliones) at Juruti River Plateau, State of Pará, Brazil Ricardo Pinto-Da-Rocha & Alexandre B
    ARTÍCULO: A structured inventory of harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones) at Juruti River plateau, State of Pará, Brazil Ricardo Pinto-da-Rocha & Alexandre B. Bonaldo Abstract: The first structured inventory of harvestmen in the Brazilian Amazon Rain Forest was carried out at Juruti municipality, Pará State. The sampling protocol was done in three plots of (1 ha each) non-flooded upland forest, on the Juruti River plateau, nearly 60 km from the right margin of the Amazon river, and one plot in a floodplain forest area, at the Amazon river margin. To ensure assessment of the majority of potential habitats, seven collecting techniques were used, resulting in 466 individuals from 28 species. Each ARTÍCULO: upland site provided 16-18 species. Flooded forest habitat was A structured inventory of undersampled, and only five species were recorded. From the seven harvestmen (Arachnida: Opiliones) collecting methods employed, litter manual sorting resulted in the highest at Juruti River plateau, State of Pará, number of species per sample, and beating tray the highest ratio of Brazil individuals per sample. These two collection techniques, along with nocturnal ground search, were the most effective sampling techniques for a protocol for Ricardo Pinto da Rocha collecting harvestmen in this site. Departamento de Zoologia, Key words: Amazonian Rain Forest, Diversity, Inventory, Opiliones, Sampling protocol Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, 321, Un inventario estructurado de los Opiliones (Arachnida) del altiplano 05508-900 São Paulo SP, Brazil; [email protected] del Río Juruti, Estado de Pará, Brasil Alexandre B. Bonaldo Resumen: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, El primer inventario estructurado de Opiliones en la Selva Amazónica fue Coordenação de Zoologia, realizado en Juruti, Estado de Pará, Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R
    Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R. and Zeuss, D. 2016. Colour lightness of dragonfly assemblages across North America and Europe. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.02578 Supplementary material Appendix 1 Figures A1–A12, Table A1 and A2 1 Figure A1. Scatterplots between female and male colour lightness of 44 North American (Needham et al. 2000) and 19 European (Askew 1988) dragonfly species. Note that colour lightness of females and males is highly correlated. 2 Figure A2. Correlation of the average colour lightness of European dragonfly species illustrated in both Askew (1988) and Dijkstra and Lewington (2006). Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Note that the extracted colour values of dorsal dragonfly drawings from both sources are highly correlated. 3 Figure A3. Frequency distribution of the average colour lightness of 152 North American and 74 European dragonfly species. Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Rugs at the abscissa indicate the value of each species. Note that colour values are from different sources (North America: Needham et al. 2000, Europe: Askew 1988), and hence absolute values are not directly comparable. 4 Figure A4. Scatterplots of single ordinary least-squares regressions between average colour lightness of 8,127 North American dragonfly assemblages and mean temperature of the warmest quarter. Red dots represent assemblages that were excluded from the analysis because they contained less than five species. Note that those assemblages that were excluded scatter more than those with more than five species (c.f. the coefficients of determination) due to the inherent effect of very low sampling sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata
    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009. Copyright © 2009 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 edition published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Tramea carolina (Carolina Saddlebags), Cabin Lake, Aiken Co., South Carolina, 13 May 2008, Dennis Paulson. 1 1724 NE 98 Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 457 species of North American Odonata considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approxi- mate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION Before the first edition of this checklist there was no re- Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, cent checklist of North American Odonata. Muttkows- with number of species. ki (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Zygoptera and Anisoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Westfall and May (2006) and Needham, West- fall, and May (2000), respectively, but some changes Calopterygidae 2 8 in nomenclature have been made subsequently. Davies Lestidae 2 19 and Tobin (1984, 1985) listed the world odonate fauna Coenagrionidae 15 103 but did not include type localities or details of distri- Platystictidae 1 1 bution.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ESPECIES VEGETALES EN PELIGRO, SU DISTRIBUCIÓN Y
    Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales ISSN: 2007-1132 [email protected] Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias México Royo-Márquez, Mario Humberto; Melgoza-Castillo, Alicia; Quintana-Martínez, Gustavo ESPECIES VEGETALES EN PELIGRO, SU DISTRIBUCIÓN Y ESTATUS DE CONSERVACIÓN DE LOS ECOSISTEMAS DONDE SE PRESENTAN Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, vol. 5, núm. 22, marzo-abril, 2014, pp. 86-103 Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=63439004007 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto ESPECIES VEGETALES EN PELIGRO, SU DISTRIBUCIÓN Y ESTATUS DE CONSERVACIÓN DE LOS ECOSISTEMAS DONDE SE PRESENTAN ENDANGERED VEGETAL SPECIES, THEIR DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF THE ECOSYSTEMS IN WHICH THEY OCCUR Mario Humberto Royo-Márquez1, Alicia Melgoza-Castillo2 y Gustavo Quintana-Martínez2 RESUMEN En México, la norma oficial mexicana (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) integra especies de flora y fauna silvestres en riesgo, pero no especifica su distribución geográfica. Como base para la realización de planes de conservación en el estado de Chihuahua es importante identificar las plantas incluidas en dicha norma, otras que deberían integrarse por su distribución restringida y rareza, así como el estado de conservación de los ecosistemas donde se presentan. En este contexto, se revisó una base de datos de alrededor de 4 000 especies de la flora de la entidad; se consultó la literatura disponible; y se realizaron visitas a diversos herbarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Bee Communities Within Vacant Lots and Urban Farms Result from Variation in Surrounding Urbanization Intensity
    sustainability Article Unique Bee Communities within Vacant Lots and Urban Farms Result from Variation in Surrounding Urbanization Intensity Frances S. Sivakoff ID , Scott P. Prajzner and Mary M. Gardiner * ID Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; [email protected] (F.S.S.); [email protected] (S.P.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-330-601-6628 Received: 1 May 2018; Accepted: 5 June 2018; Published: 8 June 2018 Abstract: We investigated the relative importance of vacant lot and urban farm habitat features and their surrounding landscape context on bee community richness, abundance, composition, and resource use patterns. Three years of pan trap collections from 16 sites yielded a rich assemblage of bees from vacant lots and urban farms, with 98 species documented. We collected a greater bee abundance from vacant lots, and the two forms of greenspace supported significantly different bee communities. Plant–pollinator networks constructed from floral visitation observations revealed that, while the average number of bees utilizing available resources, niche breadth, and niche overlap were similar, the composition of floral resources and common foragers varied by habitat type. Finally, we found that the proportion of impervious surface and number of greenspace patches in the surrounding landscape strongly influenced bee assemblages. At a local scale (100 m radius), patch isolation appeared to limit colonization of vacant lots and urban farms. However, at a larger landscape scale (1000 m radius), increasing urbanization resulted in a greater concentration of bees utilizing vacant lots and urban farms, illustrating that maintaining greenspaces provides important habitat, even within highly developed landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • © 2016 David Paul Moskowitz ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
    © 2016 David Paul Moskowitz ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE LIFE HISTORY, BEHAVIOR AND CONSERVATION OF THE TIGER SPIKETAIL DRAGONFLY (CORDULEGASTER ERRONEA HAGEN) IN NEW JERSEY By DAVID P. MOSKOWITZ A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Entomology Written under the direction of Dr. Michael L. May And approved by _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey January, 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION THE LIFE HISTORY, BEHAVIOR AND CONSERVATION OF THE TIGER SPIKETAIL DRAGONFLY (CORDULEGASTER ERRONEA HAGEN) IN NEW JERSEY by DAVID PAUL MOSKOWITZ Dissertation Director: Dr. Michael L. May This dissertation explores the life history and behavior of the Tiger Spiketail dragonfly (Cordulegaster erronea Hagen) and provides recommendations for the conservation of the species. Like most species in the genus Cordulegaster and the family Cordulegastridae, the Tiger Spiketail is geographically restricted, patchily distributed with its range, and a habitat specialist in habitats susceptible to disturbance. Most Cordulegastridae species are also of conservation concern and the Tiger Spiketail is no exception. However, many aspects of the life history of the Tiger Spiketail and many other Cordulegastridae are poorly understood, complicating conservation strategies. In this dissertation, I report the results of my research on the Tiger Spiketail in New Jersey. The research to investigate life history and behavior included: larval and exuvial sampling; radio- telemetry studies; marking-resighting studies; habitat analyses; observations of ovipositing females and patrolling males, and the presentation of models and insects to patrolling males.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Index of ARGIA and Bulletin of American Odonatology
    Cumulative Index of ARGIA and Bulletin of American Odonatology Compiled by Jim Johnson PDF available at http://odonata.bogfoot.net/docs/Argia-BAO_Cumulative_Index.pdf Last updated: 14 February 2021 Below are titles from all issues of ARGIA and Bulletin of American Odonatology (BAO) published to date by the Dragonfly Society of the Americas. The purpose of this listing is to facilitate the searching of authors and title keywords across all issues in both journals, and to make browsing of the titles more convenient. PDFs of ARGIA and BAO can be downloaded from https://www.dragonflysocietyamericas.org/en/publications. The most recent three years of issues for both publications are only available to current members of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas. Contact Jim Johnson at [email protected] if you find any errors. ARGIA 1 (1–4), 1989 Welcome to the Dragonfly Society of America Cook, C. 1 Society's Name Revised Cook, C. 2 DSA Receives Grant from SIO Cook, C. 2 North and Central American Catalogue of Odonata—A Proposal Donnelly, T.W. 3 US Endangered Species—A Request for Information Donnelly, T.W. 4 Odonate Collecting in the Peruvian Amazon Dunkle, S.W. 5 Collecting in Costa Rica Dunkle, S.W. 6 Research in Progress Garrison, R.W. 8 Season Summary Project Cook, C. 9 Membership List 10 Survey of Ohio Odonata Planned Glotzhober, R.C. 11 Book Review: The Dragonflies of Europe Cook, C. 12 Book Review: Dragonflies of the Florida Peninsula, Bermuda and the Bahamas Cook, C. 12 Constitution of the Dragonfly Society of America 13 Exchanges and Notices 15 General Information About the Dragonfly Society of America (DSA) Cook, C.
    [Show full text]