May 1984, Vol. 10 No. 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

May 1984, Vol. 10 No. 2 T HE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE LEWIS & CLARK TRAIL HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INC. VOL. 10 NOS. 2 AND 3 MAY 1984 A Special Ornithological Issue Birds Observed and Documented by Members of the Lewis and Clark Expedition Lewis's Woodpecker Clark's Nutcracker In This Issue "A History of Lewis's Woodpecker and Clark's Nutcracker", by Paul Russell Cutright, page 9. " Birds of the Lewis and Clark Jour nals", by Virginia C. Holmgren, page 17. "Summary of Birds Seen by Lewis and Clark" , compiled by Virginia C. Holmgren, page 23. "A Glossary of Bird Names Cited by Lewis and Clark", compiled by Virginia C. Holmgren, page 28. President Large's Message THE LEWIS AND CLARK TRAIL E xtra effort has gone into this Spe­ HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INC. cial Ornithological Issue of We Pro­ Incorporated 1969 under Missouri General Not-For-Profit Corporation Act IRS Exemption ceeded On, and that's no surprise. Certificate No. 501(C)(3) - Identification No. 51-018 7715 Editor Bob Lange is never content to crank out a routine installment of OFFICERS - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE our Foundation's quarterly publica­ President 1st Vice President 2nd Vice President tion. He's always reaching for some­ thing more. Extra effort is the driv­ Arlen J . large William P. Sherman Clifford lmsland 120V2 Rumsey Court, S.E. 3291 S .W. Fairmount Blvd. 519 North 79th St. ing force behind any successful or­ Washington. D .C. 20003 Portland, OR 97201 Seattle, WA 98103 g aniza ti on of unpaid volunteer members. If our Foundation has an Edrie Lee Vinson, Secretary Clarence H. Decker. Treasurer abundance of people ready to strive 258 Hope Road P.O. Box. 128 Helena, MT 59601 East Alton, IL 62024 beyond what's merely adequate, they're just taking inspiration from DIRECTORS that energy-charged corps of discov­ erers which embarked upon the Todd Berens Viola forrest Margaret Norris broad Missouri nearly 180 years Santa Ana, CA Walla Walla, WA Fayetteville, N .Y. ago. Harold Billian Helen Hetrick Charles C . Patton Villlanova, PA Glasgow, MT Springfield. IL From President Jefferson the Lewis and Clark expedition had received a Roy D. Craft H. John Montague James P. Ronda Stevenson. WA Marietta, GA Youngstown, OH checklist of demanding tasks. To J ohn E. Foote Gary E. Moulton Robert L Taylor the co-captains, complying with Billings, MT Lincoln, NE W ashington, D .C. those instructions was only the min­ Hazel Bain, Longview, WA. Immediate Past President, is a Foundation Director. imum objective, and even that was terribly hard. The President wanted PAST PRESIDENTS - DIRECTORS EX OFFICIO celestial observations of latitude and longitude made "with great Edwynne P. Murphy, 1970 Robert E. Lange, 1973-1974 Gail M . Stensland, 1977-78 St. Louis, Missouri Portland, Oregon Fort Benton, Montana pains and accuracy," but there were E.G. Chuinard. M .D., 1971 Gary Leppart, 1974-1975 Mitchell Doumit, 1978-79 places where trees blocked the sky. Tigard. Oregon Lewistown, Montana Cathlamet. Washington The trees had to be chopped down John Greenslit, 1972 Wilbur P. Werner. 1975-1 976 Bob Saindon, 1979-1980 before work with sextant and octant Lansing, Michigan Cut Bank. Montana Helena, Montana could even begin. Just the basic Lynn Burris, Jr.• 1972-1 973 Clarence H. Decker, 1976-77 Irving w. Anderson. 1980-81 logistical measures needed to keep Topeka, Kansas East Alton, Illinois Portland, Oregon the exploring party from starving V. Strode Hinds. D .D .S. 1981-1982 Hazel Bain, 1982-1983 often required that extra little push. Sioux City, Iowa Longview, W ashington Wilderness currency to buy food from the Indians included buttons Ruth E. Lange, Membership Secretary, 5054 S.W. 26th Place, Portland, OR 97201 cut from the captains' coats. Elk ABOUT THE FOUNDATION meat which a hunter attempted to dry and preserved in the woods The purpose of the lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Foundation. Inc .• is to stimulate nationally: public interest came back to camp in danger of in matters relating to the l ewis and Clark Expedition; the contributions to American history made by the expedition m embers: and events of t ime and place concerning a nd following the expedition which are of spoiling, so " . .. we had it cut thin­ historical import to our nation. The Foundation recognizes the value of tourist-oriented programs. and ner and re dryed over a fire." suooorts activities w hich enhance the enjoyment and understandina of the lewis and Clark storv. The scope_ of the activities of the Foundation are broad and diverse. and include involvement in pursuits which. in the judgment of the Directors are. of historical worth or contemporary social values. and commensurate with In his charter of exploration the the heritage ot Lewis and Clark. The actiyities of the National Foundation are Intended to compliment and supplement those of state and local Lewis and Clark interest groups. The Foundation m ay appropriately President hadn't mentioned the Yel­ recognize and honor individuals or groups for: art works of distinction; achievement in the broad field of lowstone River, and nobody would Lewis and Clark historical research; writing; or deeds which promote th e general purpose and scope of activities of the Foundation. Membership in the organization comprises a broad spectrum of Lewis and have blamed Capt. Clark for dash­ Clark enthusiasts including Federal, State. and local government officials, historians. scholars, and others of wide ranging Lewis and Clark interests. Officers of the Foundation are elected from the membership. The ing straight home by the same route Annual Meeting of the Foundation is traditionally held during August, the birth month of both Meriwether he followed to the Pacific. His re­ Lewis and William Clark. The meeting place is rotated among the States, and tours generally are arranged to vi sit sites in the are a of the Annual Meeting which have historic association with the Lewis and Clark turn trip down the Yellowstone on Expedition. the lookout for future trading sites WE PROCEEDED ON ISSN 0275-6706 E.G. CHU/NARD. M .D .• FOUNDER was an uninstructed bonus. Capt. Lewis similarly volunteered a risky We Proceeded On is the official publication of the Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Foundation, side trip far up the Marias River to Inc. The publication's name is derived from the phrase which appears repeatedly in the scout the further reaches of British collective journals of the famous Expedition. for country. The minimum, the ex­ PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE pected, wasn't enough. (continued on facing page) Robert E. Lange, Editor and Committee Chairman, 5054 S .W. 26th Place. Portland. OR 97201 Irving W . Anderson Donald Jackson Cover Illustrations: Box LC-196 Lewis & Clark College 3920 Old Stage Road Portland, OR 97219 Colorado Springs, CO 80906 The illustrations are by Marie E.G . Chuinard Gary E. Moulton Nonnast Bohlen and are repro­ 15537 S. W. Summerfield Lane Love Library - Univ. Nebraska duced from North American Tigard, OR 97223 Lincoln, NE 68588 Birds, by Lorus and Margery Paul R . Cutright Wilbur P. W arner Milne, through the courtesy of 312 Summit Avenue P.O. Box 438 Jenkintown, PA 19046 Cut Bank, MT 59427 the publisher Prentice-Hall, Inc., © 1963, 1969. -2- We Proceeded On, May 1984 Today's Foundation members don't Relates to article, WPO, Vol. 10, No. 1, p . 7 give up the buttons on their coats. Rather, many offer the gift of their time, lots of it. Over the years doz­ ens of people have spent long hours planning each intricate detail of the Foundation's annual meetings. Next August's meeting in Great Falls will be the third such program for which Montana's Bob Saindon has taken major responsibility. Rounding up new members, one by one, can be hard, slogging work. In North Dakota Sheila Robinson, a former Foundation director, has since last August recruited 12 new members by taking the time to write letters. Sheila has earned strong praise from Membership Secretary Ruth Lange: "Her efforts continue to show results and serve as a fine example of individual accomplish­ ment." So you don't have to be a buckskin­ clad explorer of the 19th century to set an example of how to press be­ yond the minimum. You see it in John A. Caylor, Boise, Idaho, shortly before his death (see page 8, this issue this splendid issue of We Proceeded of We Proceeded On), joined Idaho Governor John V. Evans for the signing On, and in the dedication of so of "Executive Order No. 83-21", which created the Idaho Lewis and Clark many of our members to make the Trail Committee. The ten appointed members of the governor's committee Foundation a more satisfying ve­ had elected Caylor chairman of the committee. John Caylor, a former direc­ hicle for roaming the trails of Amer­ tor of the Foundation (1973-1975) was a professor of history at Boise State ica n history. That goal is indeed University. The signing of the order took place in December 1983, the com­ worth our extra effort. mittee's first meeting was held in Boise, January 21, 1984. A September 1984 Arlen J . Large, President meeting is scheduled at Lewiston, Idaho. Color Comes to We Proceeded On - About This Special Ornithological Issue Birdwatching is a popular avocation for a great many individuals. We might wonder, however, just how many modern-day bird enthusiasts know that members of the Lewis and Clark Expedition, especially Meriwether Lewis, were acute observers and documentors of the many birds encountered during their journey across a substantial portion of the North American Continent. To tell of Meriwether Lewis and William Clark's and their exploring party's interest and activities related to the many birds encountered during their two year, four month, and nine day travel from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean and return, is the purpose for this "Special Ornithological Issue" of We Proceeded On.
Recommended publications
  • 04. Ecological Relationships Lesson #3: CLARK THE
    Ecological Relationships Lesson #3: CLARK THE NUTCRACKER SOverviewTORY: This introduces the art of creating a species account. The account identifies the important qualities of a species through a scientific drawing. This then leads to exploration of the interrelationship of the Clark’s Nutcracker (a type of woodpecker) and the whitebark pine. Learner Outcomes Getting Ready Youth will: Materials: Youth need journals and writing utensils; staff need 1. Know how to complete a species account colored pencils, poker chips, and handouts. identifying the important species Preparation: For the “Made for Each Other” activity, set up the characteristics through a scientific whitebark pine food sources in 4 piles of poker chips and spread drawing. them out in the center of the area. The three cache sites should 2. Know the life history of the Clark’s not be more than seven feet apart and should be on the outside Nutcracker. circle of the food source. Assign cache sites to each group. Use 3. Understand mutualism in the ecological different objects to mark the cache sites. context of Yellowstone National Park. Location: A large area (25 x 25 yards) would be preferable for 4. Know how to define whitebark pine the “Made for Each Other” activity. An ideal location would ecosystem functions. have whitebark pines and/or Clark’s Nutcracker activity. Background The following material is not required to instruct this lesson. Adapted from Yellowstone Resources and Issues Handbook: 2013. Forest Insect Pest The conifer trees of Yellowstone face many threats, however the most damaging one is the native pine bark beetle. It is indicated that this species has been around for centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • There's No Place Like Home
    United States Department of Agriculture There’s No Place Like Home: D E E Forest Service P R A R U TM U LT ENT OF AGRIC Pacific Northwest Region Clark’s Nutcracker Home Ranges and 2011 Whitebark Pine Regeneration FOR CLARK’S nutcrackers, “home” is a year-round hub. What do we mean by “space use” and “home range”? Although nutcrackers show tenacious fidelity to home ranges in winter, spring, and summer, they spend every “Space use” describes how animals use a landscape. The term autumn traveling around to harvest seeds. Nearly all seeds is most commonly used to discuss home range characteristics are transported back home for storage, a process that has and the selection of resources (habitats, food items, roost sites) vast implications for forest regeneration. within home ranges. In our study, we used the term “home range” to describe the BACKGROUND area used by a resident nutcracker for all year-round activities We investigated habitat use, caching behavior, and except seed harvest. This is because areas used for seed harvest migratory patterns in Clark’s nutcrackers in the Pacific in autumn were ever-changing and temporary—birds showed Northwest using radio telemetry. Over 4 years (2006– no fidelity to forests used for seed harvest, but rather used these 2009), we captured 54 adult nutcrackers at 10 sites in the forests only as long as seeds were present on trees. Cascade and Olympic Mountains in Washington State. What do we know about nutcracker space use? We fitted nutcrackers with a back-pack style harness. The battery life on the radio tags was 450 days, and Vander Wall and Balda (1977) and Tomback (1978) were the we tracked nutcrackers year-round, on foot (to obtain first to report that nutcrackers harvest large-seeded pines in behavior observations) and via aircraft (to obtain point autumn and often range over large areas and multiple elevation locations).
    [Show full text]
  • IS-MND Blue Jay Well Site Project-Final
    INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LAKE ARROWHEAD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BLUE JAY WELL SITE PROJECT N0. 187 Lake Arrowhead, California (San Bernardino County) Prepared for: LAKE ARROWHEAD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 27307 CA-189 Blue Jay, California 92317 Prepared by: CHAMBERS GROUP, INC. 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 750 Santa Ana, California 92707 (949) 261-5414 November 2020 Blue Jay Well Site Project, Lake Arrowhead, San Bernardino County, California TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1.0 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................... 5 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ....................................................................................... 5 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................ 5 1.3 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................. 5 1.3.1 Project Schedule .............................................................................................................. 8 1.4 REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS........................................................................................ 10 1.4.1 Responsible Agencies ..................................................................................................... 10 SECTION 2.0 – ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ........................................................................... 11 2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Cover
    VOLUME V /ISSUE 1 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2007 On the Enjoying A Presque Isle Winter ........ 4 Cover... Presque Isle Bay’s ice is Learning to Love Sailing ........................... 6 another way to love Erie winters like member Stan Zlotkowski “test flying” a Big Girls ..................................................... 8 new locally designed kite called a “YFO” just west of the Club in 2004. What’s An Entson? ................................. 10 Officers Commodore John Murosky........... 456-7797 Recapping the EYCRF Season ............... 18 [email protected] Vice Commodore Dave Arthurs.... 455-3935 [email protected] Basin On The Rise ................................... 22 R/C Dave Amatangelo .................. 452-0010 [email protected] Fleet Captain Tom Trost ............... 490-3363 Personal Watercraft Regulations ...................... 12 [email protected] When I Was A Kid ............................................... 16 Directors P/C James Means ............................... 833-4358 “131 Days To Summer” Party ........................... 20 [email protected] Bob McGee .................................. 838-6551 Yachtswomen of the Year ................................... 26 [email protected] Gerry Urbaniak ............................ 454-4456 Gail Garren Award ............................................. 28 [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS CONTENTS CONTENTS CONTENTS Bradley Enterline....................... 453-5004 [email protected] Sam “Rusty” Miller .................... 725-5331 [email protected] Greg Gorny
    [Show full text]
  • State and Federal Actions Will Affect and Be Affected by Implementation Ofthe Village Ofsag Harbor Local Waterftont Revitalization Program (L WRP)
    State and federal actions will affect and be affected by implementation ofthe Village ofSag Harbor Local WaterfTont Revitalization Program (L WRP). Under State law and the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act, certain State and federal actions \\~thin or affecting the local waterfront area must be "consistent" or "consistent to the maximum extent practicable" \"lith the enforceable policics and purposes ofthe LWRP. This consistency requirement makes the LWRP a unique. intergovernmental mechanism for sening policy and making decisions and helps to prevent detrimental actions from occurring and future options from being needlessly foreclosed. \Vhile consistency requirements primarily help prevent detrimental actions from occurring and help ensure that future options are not needlessly foreclosed, active participation of the part ofState and federal agencies is also likely to be necessary to implement specific provisions of the LViRP. The first pan ofthis section identifies the actions and programs ofState and federal agencies which should be undertaken in a manner consistent with the LWRP. This is a generic list of actions and programs, as identified by the New York State Department ofState; therefore, some of the actions and programs listed may not be relevant to this LWRP. Pursuant to the State Waterfront Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways Act (Executive Law, Article 42). the Secretary ofState individually and separately notifies affected State agencies ofthose agency actions and programs which are to be undertaken in a manner consistent with approved LWRPs. Similarly, federal agenc), actions and programs subject to consistency requirements are identified in the manner prescribed by the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act and its implementing regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perplexing Pinyon Jay
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences Papers in the Biological Sciences 1998 The Ecology and Evolution of Spatial Memory in Corvids of the Southwestern USA: The Perplexing Pinyon Jay Russell P. Balda Northern Arizona University,, [email protected] Alan Kamil University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscibehavior Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons Balda, Russell P. and Kamil, Alan, "The Ecology and Evolution of Spatial Memory in Corvids of the Southwestern USA: The Perplexing Pinyon Jay" (1998). Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences. 17. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscibehavior/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published (as Chapter 2) in Animal Cognition in Nature: The Convergence of Psychology and Biology in Laboratory and Field, edited by Russell P. Balda, Irene M. Pepperberg, and Alan C. Kamil, San Diego (Academic Press, 1998), pp. 29–64. Copyright © 1998 by Academic Press. Used by permission. The Ecology and Evolution of Spatial Memory in Corvids of the Southwestern USA: The Perplexing Pinyon Jay Russell P. Balda 1 and Alan C. Kamil 2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Walker Marzluff 2017 Recreation Changes Lanscape Use of Corvids
    Recreation changes the use of a wild landscape by corvids Author(s): Lauren E. Walker and John M. Marzluff Source: The Condor, 117(2):262-283. Published By: Cooper Ornithological Society https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-14-169.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1650/CONDOR-14-169.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Volume 117, 2015, pp. 262–283 DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-14-169.1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Recreation changes the use of a wild landscape by corvids Lauren E. Walker* and John M. Marzluff College of the Environment, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA * Corresponding author: [email protected] Submitted October 24, 2014; Accepted February 13, 2015; Published May 6, 2015 ABSTRACT As urban areas have grown in population, use of nearby natural areas for outdoor recreation has also increased, potentially influencing bird distribution in landscapes managed for conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Seed Dispersal Mutualisms Amplify Restoration of American Chesnut (Castanea Dentata)? [Year 2]
    A Title: Reseeding restored forests: Can seed dispersal mutualisms amplify restoration of American Chesnut (Castanea dentata)? [Year 2] James R. Wright Collaborator: Leila Pinchot Faculty supervisors: Christopher M. Tonra and Stephen N. Matthews B SUMMARY (100 words) Seed dispersal is a fundamental mutualism between wildlife and trees. Wildlife, such as birds, often cache abundant seed from trees to enable them to survive the winter, and unrecovered seed ensures dispersal and persistence of tree species. Rapid environmental change can disrupt this critical process, potentially threatening the persistence of the ecosystem. Both the loss of American chestnut and the declines in Oak- Hickory forest represent historic and contemporary perturbations to plant-animal interactions. Understanding the capacity of Blue Jays, a prolific seed disperser, to facilitate chestnut and oak dispersal, and their seed preferences, is an important piece to sustaining these forests. C Principal Investigators and Institutional Affiliations James Wright: PhD student, School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University Cornelia (Leila) Pinchot: Research Ecologist, USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Christopher Tonra: Assistant Professor, School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University Stephen Matthews: Assistant Professor, School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State D Duration of Project Three years of research (2018-2020). This proposal resubmission is a funding request for Year 2. E Total amount requested We are requesting $8,080 to support a research technician and supplies to tag Blue Jays and Chestnuts. We recently received additional funding of $49,000 to support a graduate student and field supplies to focus on relationships between Jays and Oaks, and the proposed research here will allow us to continue the novel Chestnut component.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Repeatability, Species Differences, and The
    Supplementary Materials: Individual repeatability, species differences, and the influence of socio-ecological factors on neophobia in 10 corvid species SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 2 Figure S1 . Latency to touch familiar food in each round, across all conditions and species. Round 3 differs from round 1 and 2, while round 1 and 2 do not differ from each other. Points represent individuals, lines represent median. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 3 Figure S2 . Site effect on latency to touch familiar food in azure-winged magpie, carrion crow and pinyon jay. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 4 Table S1 Pairwise comparisons of latency data between species Estimate Standard error z p-value Blue jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.491 0.209 2.351 0.019 Carrion crow - Azure-winged magpie -0.496 0.177 -2.811 0.005 Clark’s nutcracker - Azure-winged magpie 0.518 0.203 2.558 0.011 Common raven - Azure-winged magpie -0.437 0.183 -2.392 0.017 Eurasian jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.284 0.166 1.710 0.087 ’Alal¯a- Azure-winged magpie 0.416 0.144 2.891 0.004 Large-billed crow - Azure-winged magpie 0.668 0.189 3.540 0.000 New Caledonian crow - Azure-winged magpie -0.316 0.209 -1.513 0.130 Pinyon jay - Azure-winged magpie 0.118 0.170 0.693 0.488 Carrion crow - Blue jay -0.988 0.199 -4.959 0.000 Clark’s nutcracker - Blue jay 0.027 0.223 0.122 0.903 Common raven - Blue jay -0.929 0.205 -4.537 0.000 Eurasian jay - Blue jay -0.207 0.190 -1.091 0.275 ’Alal¯a- Blue jay -0.076 0.171 -0.443 0.658 Large-billed crow - Blue jay 0.177 0.210 0.843 0.399 New Caledonian crow - Blue jay -0.808 0.228 -3.536
    [Show full text]
  • January 2019 Newsletter
    Calliope Crier The Yakima Valley Audubon Society is people dedicated to the enjoyment and preservation of the natural world. Through birding, education and conservation activities in our community, we raise awareness and promote the cause of global environmental protection. Volume 48, Number 01 A Chapter of the National Audubon Society January 2019 Demystifying Pacific Lamprey: History, JANUARY PROGRAM Ecology, Biology, Threats, and Restoration PHIL FISCHER with Dave’y Lumley Dave’y Lumley has been working as a Fisheries Technician III for the Yakama Nation Fisheries since 2013. She recently finished a degree in Biology with a specialization in Ecology at Central Washington Uni- versity and is now a fish biologist with the Yakama Nation Fisheries Resource Management Program (FRMP), Pacific Lamprey Project. Pacific Lamprey, commonly call “eels” by tribal members and others, is an incredibly important spe- cies for the Columbia River tribes in terms of food, medicine and culture. They also serve many roles in the stream ecology, benefiting many, many native Dave’y Lumley and friend. species. Dave’y Lumley sharing information and her interest in Pacific Lampreys or “eels” with student groups. Mark your calendar for Thursday, January 25, at 7:00 to see this presentation at the Yakima Area Arboretum Visit the Yakima Valley Audubon Society’s website at: http://www.yakimaaudubon.org Page 2 January 2019 Calliope Crier PRESIDENT’S COLUMN BILL DRENGUIS Reflections on New Year’s: Well I had fun last year, hope Our education arm was also very active. Audubon was a you did too. Some of my highlights were--- real presence at the Arboretum's Arbor Fest, and at The speakers for the monthly meetings were superb.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota State Parks and Trails Bird Checklist Scenic State Park
    Birding at Scenic State Park STATE PARK BIRDS Sp S F W DATE STATE PARK BIRDS Sp S F W DATE STATE PARK BIRDS Sp S F W DATE The Fire Tower Trail, leading through this magnificent forest, GEESE, SWANS, DUCKS CORMORANTS FLYCATCHERS has always been a sought-after area for birders. This is one Canada Goose U U U Double-crested Cormorant R Great Crested Flycatcher U U U of the few places in the state where one can see Spruce Grouse with relative ease. Ruffed Grouse, Canada Jay, Boreal Trumpeter Swan U U U BITTERNS, HERONS, EGRETS, NIGHT-HERONS Eastern Kingbird O O O Chickadee, and the occasional Black-backed Woodpecker Wood Duck U U U American Bittern O O O Olive-sided Flycatcher U U U are other treats along the trail. Red Crossbills can be heard Blue-winged Teal U U Great Blue Heron U U U Eastern Wood-pewee U U U during any season. Winter Wren and Hermit Thrush greet the birder with their beautiful songs. Mallard U U NEW WORLD VULTURES Yellow-bellied Flycatcher U U U Ring-necked Duck U U U Turkey Vulture U C U Alder Flycatcher U U U Scenic is a great place for warblers; 24 species are regularly Lesser Scaup O O OSPREY Least Flycatcher C C C recorded in the park during migration and during the Osprey U U U Eastern Phoebe C C C breeding season. The rare Connecticut warbler is found Common Goldeneye U U in the park. Merlins nest near the cabin along Coon Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-B 17 January 2018
    AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2018-B 17 January 2018 No. Page Title 01 02 Split Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus into four species 02 05 Restore Canada Jay as the English name of Perisoreus canadensis 03 13 Recognize two genera in Stercorariidae 04 15 Split Red-eyed Vireo (Vireo olivaceus) into two species 05 19 Split Pseudobulweria from Pterodroma 06 25 Add Tadorna tadorna (Common Shelduck) to the Checklist 07 27 Add three species to the U.S. list 08 29 Change the English names of the two species of Gallinula that occur in our area 09 32 Change the English name of Leistes militaris to Red-breasted Meadowlark 10 35 Revise generic assignments of woodpeckers of the genus Picoides 11 39 Split the storm-petrels (Hydrobatidae) into two families 1 2018-B-1 N&MA Classification Committee p. 280 Split Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus into four species Effect on NACC: This proposal would change the species circumscription of Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus by splitting it into four species. The form that occurs in the NACC area is nominate pacificus, so the current species account would remain unchanged except for the distributional statement and notes. Background: The Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus was until recently (e.g., Chantler 1999, 2000) considered to consist of four subspecies: pacificus, kanoi, cooki, and leuconyx. Nominate pacificus is highly migratory, breeding from Siberia south to northern China and Japan, and wintering in Australia, Indonesia, and Malaysia. The other subspecies are either residents or short distance migrants: kanoi, which breeds from Taiwan west to SE Tibet and appears to winter as far south as southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]